Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 61, Issue 5, pp 565–568 | Cite as

Coronal loops, flare ribbons and aurora during slip-running

  • Brigitte Schmieder
  • Guillaume Aulanier
  • Pascal Démoulin
  • Etienne Pariat
Open Access


Solar two ribbon flares are commonly explained by magnetic field reconnections in the low corona. During the reconnection energetic particles (electrons and protons) are accelerated from the reconnection site. These particles are following the magnetic field lines down to the chromosphere. As the plasma density is higher in these lower layers, there are collisions and emission of radiation. Thus bright ribbons are observed at both ends of flare loops. These ribbons are typically observed in Hα and in EUV with SoHO and TRACE. As the time is going, these ribbons are expanding away of each other. In most studied models, the reconnection site is a separator line, where two magnetic separatrices intersect. They define four distinct connectivity domains, across which the magnetic connectivity changes discontinuously. In this paper, we present a generalization of this model to 3D complex magnetic topologies where there are no null points, but quasi-separatrices layers instead. In that case, while the ribbons spread away during reconnection, we show that magnetic field lines can quickly slip along them. We propose that this new phenomenon could explain fast extension of Hα and TRACE 1600 Å ribbons, fast moving HXR footpoints along the ribbons as observed by RHESSI, and that it is observed in soft X rays with Hinode/XRT.

Key words

Sun: flares magnetosphere: aurora 


  1. Antiochos, S. K., C. R. DeVore, and J. A. Klimchuk, A model for solar coronal mass ejections, Astrophys. J., 510, 485–493, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aulanier, G., E. E. Deluca, S. K. Antiochos, A. McMullen, and L. Golub, The topology and evolution of the Bastille day flare, Astrophys. J., 540, 1126–1142, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aulanier, G., E. Pariat, and P. Démoulin, Current sheet formation in quasiseparatrix layers and hyperbolic flux tubes, Astron. Astrophys., 444, 961–976, 2005.Google Scholar
  4. Aulanier, G., E. Pariat, P. Démoulin, and DeVore, Slip-running reconnection in quasi-separatrix layers, Sol. Phys., 238, 347–376, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aulanier, G., L. Golub, E. W. DeLuca, J. W. Cirtain, R. Kano, L. L. Lundquist, N. Nakurage, T. Sakao, and M. Weber, Science, 2007 (submitted).Google Scholar
  6. Berlicki, A., B. Schmieder, N. Vilmer, G. Aulanier, and G. DeZanna, Evolution and magnetic topology of the M1.0 flare of October 22, 2002, Astron. Astrophys., 423, 1119–1131, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, P. F. and K. Shibata, An emerging flux trigger mechanism for coronal mass ejections, Astrophys. J., 545, 524–531, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DelZanna, G., B. Schmieder, H. Mason, A. Berlicki, and S. Bradshaw, The gradual phase of the X17 flare on October 28, 2003, Sol. Phys., 239, 173–191, 2006a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. DelZanna, G., A. Berlicki, B. Schmieder, and H. Mason, A multiwavelength study of the compact M1 flare on October 22, 2002, Sol. Phys., 234, 95–113, 2006b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Démoulin, P., Magnetic topologies: where will reconnection occur?, in ESA SP, edited by Innes, D., Lagg, A., and Solanki, S. A., 596, 2005.Google Scholar
  11. Démoulin, P., Extending the concept of separatrices to QSLs for magnetic reconnection, Adv. Space Res., 37, 1269–1282, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Démoulin, P., J. C. Hénoux, E. R. Priest, and C. Mandrini, Quasi-Separatrix layers in solar flares. I. Method, Astron. Astrophys., 308, 643–655, 1996a.Google Scholar
  13. Démoulin, P., E. Priest, and D. Lonie, Three-dimensional magnetic reconnection without null points, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 7631–7646, 1996b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Démoulin, P., L. G. Bagala, C. Mandrini, J. C. Hénoux, and M. G. Rovira, Quasi-separatrix layers in solar flares. II. Observed magnetic configurations, Astron. Astrophys., 325, 305–317 1997.Google Scholar
  15. Forbes, T. G. and P. A. Isenberg, A catastrophe mechanism for coronal mass ejections, ApJ, 373, 294–307, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Klimchuk, J., Models of CMEs, Geographical Monograph, 125, 143, 2001.Google Scholar
  17. Li, H., B. Schmieder, G. Aulanier, and A. Berlicki, Is pre-eruptive null point reconnection required for triggering eruptions?, Sol. Phys., 237, 85–100, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Lin, J., T. G. Forbes, P. Isenberg, and P. Démoulin, The effect of curvature on flux-rope models of coronal mass ejections, Astrophys. J., 504, 1006–1009, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, J., Motions of flare ribbons and loops in various magnetic configurations, Sol. Phys., 222, 115–136, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Longcope, D. W., Topological methods for the analysis of solar magnetic fields, Living Rev. Sol. Phys., 2, 1–25, 2005.Google Scholar
  21. Mandrini, C. H., P. Démoulin, B. Schmieder, E. E. DeLuca, E. Pariat, and W. Uddin, Companion event and precursor of the X17 flare on 28 October 2003, Sol. Phys., 238, 293–312, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Régnier, S. and R. C. Canfield, Evolution of magnetic fields and energetics of flares in active region 8210, Astron. Astrophys., 451, 319–330, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schmieder, B., Magnetic source regions of coronal mass ejections, J. Astrophys. Astron., 27, 139–149, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schmieder, B., P. Heinzel, L. van Driel, and J. R. Lemen, Post-flare loops of 26 June 1992, II, Sol. Phys., 165, 303–328, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schmieder, B., G. Aulanier, P. Démoulin, L. van Driel, T. Roudier, N. Nitta, and G. Cauzzi, Magnetic reconnection driven by emergence of sheared magnetic field, Astron. Astrophys., 325, 1213–1225, 1997.Google Scholar
  26. Schmieder, B., C. H. Mandrini, P. Démoulin, E. Pariat, A. Berlicki, and E. DeLuca, Magnetic reconfiguration before the X 17 Solar flare of October 28 2003, Adv. Space Res., 37, 1313–1316, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Schmieder, B., C. Mandrini, G. Aulanier, H. Li, and A. Berlicki, What is the role of magnetic null points in large flares?, Adv. Space Res., 39, 1840–1846, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Su, Y. N., L. Golub, A. A. van Ballegooijen, and M. Gros, Analysis of magnetic shear in an X17 solar flare on October 28, 2003, Sol. Phys., 236, 325–349, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences; TERRAPUB. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brigitte Schmieder
    • 1
  • Guillaume Aulanier
    • 1
  • Pascal Démoulin
    • 1
  • Etienne Pariat
    • 2
  1. 1.Observatoire de ParisLESIAMeudonFrance
  2. 2.NRLWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations