Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 60, Issue 10, pp 1017–1022 | Cite as

Characterization of the 2007 Noto Hanto, Japan, earthquake

  • Haruo Horikawa
Open Access


Characterization of the 2007 Noto Hanto, Japan, earthquake (MS 6.9), a moderate-size crustal event, was performed. The rupture process was firstly inferred from strong motion data. Inversion analysis revealed that the overall rupture finished within 6 s, and the seismic moment of this earthquake was estimated to be 1.1×1019 N m (Mw 6.6). Two areas of large slip and stress drop (asperities) were inferred on the fault plane. The maximum static stress drop calculated from the derived slip distribution exceeded 16 MPa for the major asperity, and the minor asperity has a similar maximum value. An area of negative stress drop corresponding to the distribution of small slip exists between the two asperities. This strongly suggests that the fault is segmented. A boundary between surface faults was located above the major asperity, but an area of negative stress drop appeared between the asperity and fault boundary. This suggests that the configuration of the surface faults reflects only a shallow part of the causative fault. The ratio of radiated energy to seismic moment was also estimated for the purpose of estimation of fault activity. Comparison of the derived value with those of other Japanese earthquakes suggests that the causative fault of the Noto Hanto earthquake is not very active.

Key words

2007 Noto Hanto earthquake rupture process fault model strong motion data static stress change 


  1. Aoi, S., K. Obara, S. Hori, K. Kasahara, and Y. Okada, New strong-motion observation network: KiK-net, Eos, 81, F863, 2000.Google Scholar
  2. Awata, Y. and Y. Suzuki, Paleoseismology and activeity study of the No-jima fault system, which generated the Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake of Jannuary 17, 1995, Open-File Rep. Geol. Surv. Jap., 259, 1–5, 1996 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  3. Horikawa, H., Earthquake doublet in Kagoshima, Japan: Rupture of asperities in a stress shadow, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 91, 112–127, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Horikawa, H., Rupture process of the 2005 West Off Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan, earthquake, Earth Planets Space, 58, 87–92, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ide, S., Estimation of radiated energy of finite-source earthquake models, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 92, 2994–3005, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Inoue, D., K. Miyakoshi, K. Ueta, A. Miyawaki, and K. Matsuura, Active fault study in the 2000 Tottori-ken Seibu earthquake area, Zisin Ser. 2, 54, 557–573, 2002 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  7. Jin, A. and E. Fukuyama, Seismic energy for shallow earthquakes in southwest Japan, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 1314–1333, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kanamori, H., Mechanics of earthquakes, Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 22, 207–237, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaseno, Y., S. Miura, and S. Fujii, Hills and plains in the Hokuriku District, Japan, Urban Kubota, 31, 64 pp., 1992 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  10. Katagawa, H., M. Hamada, S. Yoshida, H. Kadosawa, A. Mitsuhashi, Y. Kono, and Y. Kinugasa, Geological development of the west sea area of the Noto peninsula district in the Neogene Tertiary to Quatrernary, central Japan, J. Geogr., 114, 791–810, 2005 (in Japanese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kikuchi, M. and Y. Fukao, Seismic wave energy inferred from long-period body wave inversion, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 78, 1707–1724, 1988.Google Scholar
  12. Kinoshita, S., Kyoshin net (K-NET), Seismol. Res. Lett., 69, 309–332, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Matsu’ura, M. and Y. Hasegawa, A maximum likelihood approach to nonlinear inversion under constraints, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter., 47, 179–187, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Miyatake, T., Dynamic rupture processes of inland earthquakes in Japan weak and strong asperities, Geophys. Res. Lett., 19, 1041–1044, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Okada, Y., Internal deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a halfspace, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 82, 1018–1040, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. Ota, Y., T. Matsuda, and K. Hirakawa, Active faults in Noto peninsula, Central Japan, Quat. Res., 15, 109–128, 1976 (in Japanese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sutou, H., Y. Kitaguchi, K. Yamamoto, and Y. Kono, Gravity anomaly and basement structures in southern part of the Noto peninsula, Japan—Relationship among gravity anomaly, active faults and seismicity—, Zisin Ser. 2, 56, 363–377, 2004 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  18. Suzuki, H., M. Morino, K. Iwamoto, Y. Liu, H. Fujiwara, and Y. Hayakawa, 3D subsurface structural model for strong motion simulation around Lake Biwa, Southwest Japan, Zisin Ser. 2, 58, 91–106, 2005 (in Japanese with English abstract).Google Scholar
  19. Takeo, M., Near-field synthetic seismograms taking into account of the effects of anelasticity—The effects of anelastic attenuation on seismo-grams caused by a sedimentary layer—, Meteorol. Geophys., 36, 245–257, 1985 (in Japanese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Usami, T., Materials for comprehensive list of destructive earthquakes in Japan, [416]-2001, 605 pp., University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, 2003 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  21. Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith, New, improved version of Generic Mapping Tools released, Eos, 79, 579, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Active Fault Research CenterNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST)Tsukuba, IbarakiJapan

Personalised recommendations