Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 60, Issue 3, pp 169–177 | Cite as

A tectonic interpretation of the Marmara Sea, NW Turkey from geophysical data

  • Abdullah Ates
  • Funda Bilim
  • Aydin Buyuksarac
  • Özcan Bektas
Open Access
Article

Abstract

Recent scientific investigations have revealed the deep structure and fault mechanisms in the Marmara Sea and surroundings. However, magnetic and gravity anomalies display interesting features which were not resolved in detail. In this paper, simple two-dimensional magnetic and gravity models are constructed utilizing parameters such as the density contrast and susceptibilities obtained from a borehole, seismic sections and field susceptibility measurements, respectively. The gravity model shows the existence of horst-like structures, as suggested previously. The top of the magnetic bodies in the Marmara Sea is close to the sea bottom. In general, these magnetic bodies are fault-related. The gravity model complies with the seismic base map, which was constructed previously. The magnetic anomalies of anomalous regions of the Cinarcik andWestern Basins demonstrate slight anticlockwise block rotations, while large anticlockwise block rotation is observed in the eastern extremity of the Marmara Sea. Geophysical data and modeling results suggest that the origin and evaluation of the Marmara Sea began with the possibility of emplacement of horst-like structures in the Central Ridge during the Palaeozoic or earlier followed by block rotations and intrusion of the magnetic material into the upper crust with sediment deposition and faulting. It can also be suggested that the horst-like structures in the central Marmara act to diffuse the propagation of the Northern Boundary Fault (NBF). This aspect is correlated with the focal mechanisms of the major earthquakes.

Key-words

Marmara Sea geophysical data tectonic interpretation block rotations 

References

  1. Aktar, M., S. Ozalaybey, H. Karabulut, M.-P. Bouin, C. Tapirdamaz, F. Biçmen, A. Yörük, and M. Bouchon, Spatial variation of aftershock activity across the rupture zone of the 17 August 1999 Izmit earthquake, Turkey, Tectonophysics, 391, 325–334, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambraseys, N. N. and J. A. Jackson, Seismicity of the sea of Marmara (Turkey) since 1500, Geophys. J. Int. (Fast-Track paper), 141, F1–F6, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ates, A. and P. Kearey, Structure of the Blackdown Pericline, Mendip Hills from gravity and seismic data, J. Geol. Soc. (Lond.), 150, 729–736, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ates, A., P. Kearey, and S. Tufan, New gravity and magnetic maps of Turkey, Geophys. J. Int. (Research Note), 136, 499–502, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ates, A., T. Kayiran, and I. Sincer, Structural Interpretation of the Marmara Region, NW Turkey from aeromagnetic, seismic and gravity data, Tectonophysics, 367, 41–99, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bariş, S., J. Nakajima, A. Hasegawa, Y. Honkura, A. Ito, and B. Üçer, Three-dimensional structure of Vp, Vs and Vp/Vs in the upper crust of the Marmara region, NW Turkey, Earth Planets Space, 57, 1019–1038, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barka, A. and K. Kadinsky-Cade, Strike-Slip fault geometry in Turkey and its influence on earthquake activity, Tectonics, 7, 663–684, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bilim, F and A. Ates, A computer program to estimate the source body magnetization direction from magnetic and gravity anomalies, Computers Geosci., 25, 231–240, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bilim, F and A. Ates, An enhanced method for estimation of body magnetization direction from pseudo-gravity and gravity data, Computers Geosci., 30, 161–171, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bilim, F and A. Ates, Identifying block rotations from remanent magnetization effect: Example from northern Central Turkey, Earth Planets Space, 59, 33–38, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demirbag, E., C. Rangin, X. Le Pichon, and A. M. C. Sengor, Investigation of the tectonics of the Main Marmara Fault by means of deep towed seismic data, Tectonophysics, 361, 1–19, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fedi, M., G. Florio, and A. Rapolla, The role of remanent magnetization in the Southern Italian crust from aeromagnetic anomalies, Terra Nova, 2, 629–637, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fedi, M., G. Florio, and A. Rapolla, The pattern of crustal block rotations in the Italian region deduced from aeromagnetic anomalies, in Palaeo-magnetism and tectonics of the Mediterranean region, edited by A. Morris and D. H. Tarling, pp. 147–152, J. Geol. Soc. (Lond.) Spec. Publ., 105, 1996.Google Scholar
  14. Imren, C, X. Le Pichon, C. Rangin, E. Demirbag, B. Ecevitoglu, and N. Gorur, The North Anatolian Fault within the Sea of Marmara: a new evaluation based on multichannel seismic and multibeam data, Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 186, 143–158, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ludwig, J. W., J. E. Nafe, and C. L. Drake, Seismic Refraction, in The Sea 4, edited by A. E. Maxwell, pp. 53–84, John Wiley, New York, 1970.Google Scholar
  16. McClusky, S., S. Balassanian, A. Barka, C. Demir, S. Ergintav, I. Georgiev, O. Gurkan, M. Hamburger, K. Hurst, H. Kahle, K. Kastens, G. Kekelidze, R. King, V. Kotzev, O. Lenk, S. Mahmoud, A. Mishin, M. Nadariya, A. Ouzounis, D. Paradissis, Y. Peter, M. Prilepin, R. Reilinger, I. Sanli, H. Seeger, A. Tealeb, M. N. Toksoz, and G. Veis, Global positioning system constraints on plate kinematics and dynamics in the eastern Mediterranean and Caucasus, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 5695–5719, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Meijer, P. T. and M. J. R. Wortel, Present-day dynamics of the Aegean region: a model analysis of the horizontal pattern of stress and deformation, Tectonics, 16, 879–895, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Meyer, P. L., Introductory probability and statistical applications, Wesley Publishing Co., Massachusetts, Addison, 1965.Google Scholar
  19. Michel, G. W, M. Waldhör, J. Neugebauer, and E. Appel, Sequential rotation of stretching axes, and block rotations: a structural and paleo-magnetic study along the North Anatolian Fault, Tectonophysics, 243, 97–118, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muller, J. R. and A. Aydin, Rupture progression along discontinuous oblique fault sets: implications for the Karadere rupture segment of the 1999 Izmit earthquake, and future rupture in the Sea of Marmara, Tectonophysics, 391, 283–302, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Oncel, A. O. and T. Wilson, Evaluation of earthquake potential along the North Anatolian Fault Zone in the Marmara Sea using comparisons of GPS strain and seismotectonic parameters, Tectonophysics, 418, 205–218, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Saribudak, M., M. Sanver, A. M. C. Sengor, and N. Gorur, Paleomagnetic evidence for substantial rotation of the Almacik flake within the North Anatolian Fault Zone, NW Turkey, Geophys. J. Int., 102, 563–568, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sato, T., J. Kasahara, T. Taymaz, M. Ito, A. Kamimura, T. Hayakawa, and O. Tan, A study of microearthquake seismicity and focal mechanisms within the Sea of Marmara (NW Turkey) using ocean bottom seismometers (OBSs), Tectonophysics, 391, 303–314, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sengor, A. M. C, The North Anatolian Transform Fault: Its age, offset and tectonic significance, J. Geol. Soc. (Lond.), 136, 269–282, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Storetvedt, K. M., Global wrench tectonics, Fagbokforlaget, Norway, 2003.Google Scholar
  26. Roest, W. R. and M. Pilkington, Identifying remanent magnetization effects in magnetic data, Geophysics, 58, 653–659, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Tuncer, M. K., N. Oshiman, S. Baris, Z. Kamaci, M. A. Kaya, A. M. Isikara, and Y Honkura, Further evidence for anomalous magnetic structure along the active fault in western Turkey, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 937–950, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdullah Ates
    • 1
  • Funda Bilim
    • 2
  • Aydin Buyuksarac
    • 2
  • Özcan Bektas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geophysical EngineeringAnkara University, Faculty of EngineeringAnkaraTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Geophysical EngineeringCumhuriyet University, Faculty of EngineeringSivasTurkey

Personalised recommendations