Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 58, Issue 8, pp 993–1005 | Cite as

Continuous observation of seismic wave velocity and apparent velocity using a precise seismic array and ACROSS seismic source

  • Atsushi Saiga
  • Koshun Yamaoka
  • Takahiro Kunitomo
  • Toshiki Watanabe
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We report the results of continuous monitoring—using a seismometer array—of the travel time of seismic waves generated by an ACROSS artificial seismic source. The seismometer array, which was deployed in a surface vault located 2.4 km from the source, recorded both direct P- and S-waves and refracted P- and S-waves that traveled along a velocity boundary between the granite basement and overlying sedimentary rocks. We analyzed temporal variation in differential travel time and apparent velocity for these phases for a period of 1 month and found significant temporal variation in the differential travel time. Most of the variation can be attributed to changes in environmental conditions, such as atmospheric temperature and rainfall. Variation is even observed in the seismogram that is located 50 m from the vibration source, although much smaller variation is observed in the vibration of the foundation to which the source is attached. The spectral study revealed that the effects of temperature and rainfall depend strongly on the frequency range used by ACROSS and that a large variation occurs in the 15- to 20-Hz range, especially between 17 and 20 Hz. The environmental effect on the temporal variation is comparable to the record of refracted S waves and that of a distance of 50 m, whereas a larger variation was observed in the direct S wave. This result shows that the signal is affected by the environmental change near the vibration source. The environmental effect can be drastically reduced when the signal from the 15- to 20-Hz range is eliminated in the analysis.

Key words

Active monitoring seismometer array ACROSS temporal varia tion spectral analysis 

References

  1. Alekseev, A. S., Chichinin, I. S. and Korneev, V. A., Powerful low-frequency vibrators for active seismology, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 95, 10–17, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Birch, F., The velocity of compressional waves in rocks to 10 kilobars, Part 1, J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1083–1102, 1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bokelmann, G. H. R. and H.-P. Harjes, Evidence for temporal variation of seismic velocities within the upper continental crust, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 23,789–23,894, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. Crampin, S., Geological and industrial implications of extensive dilatancy anisotropy, Nature, 328, 491–496, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Crampin, S., D. C. Booth, R. Evans, S. Peacock, and J. B. Fletcher, Changes in shear-wave splitting at Anza near the time of the North Palm Springs Earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 11,197–11,212, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Furumoto, M., Y. Ichimori, N. Hayashi, Y. Hiramatsu and T. Satoh, Seismic wave velocity changes and stress build-up in the crust of the Kanto-Tokai region, Geophys. Res. Lett., 28, 3737–3740, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hiramatsu, Y., N. Hayashi, M. Furumoto, and H. Katao, Temporal changes in coda Q-1 and b-value due to the static stress change associated with the 1995 Hyogo-ken Nanbu earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 105, 6141–6151, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ikuta, R. and K. Yamaoka, Temporal variation of shear wave anisotropy detected with ACROSS, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B09305, doi:10.1029/2003JB002901, 2004.Google Scholar
  9. Ikuta, R., K. Yamaoka, K. Miyakawa, T. Kunitomo, and M. Kumazawa, Continuous monitoring of propagation velocity of seismic wave using ACROSS, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, 13, 10.1029/2001GL013974, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kumazawa, M. and Y. Takei, Active method of monitoring underground structures by means of ACROSS. 1. Purpose and principle, Abstr. Seismol. Soc. Jpn., 2, 158, 1994.Google Scholar
  11. Kunitomo, T. and M. Kumazawa, Active monitoring of the Earth’s structure by the seismic ACROSS—Transmitting and receiving technologies of the seismic ACROSS, Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Active Monitoring Solid Earth Geophysics, 181–184, 2004.Google Scholar
  12. Li, Y.-G., J. E. Vidale, K. Aki, F. Xu, and T. Burdette, Evidence of shallow fault zone strengthening after the 1992 M7.7 Landers, California, earthquake, Science, 279, 217–219, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McEvilly, T. V. and L. R. Johnson, Stability of P and S velocities from central California quarry blasts, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 64, 343–353, 1974.Google Scholar
  14. Neidell, N. S. and M. T. Taner, Semblance and other coherency measures for multichannel data, Geophysics, 36, 486–497, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Niu, F., P. G. Silver, R. M. Nadeau, and T. V. McEvilly, Migration of seismic scatterers associated with the 1993 Parkfield aseismic transient event, Nature, 426, 544–548, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Nur, A., Dilatancy, pore fluids and premonitory variations of ts/tp travel times, Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am., 62, 1217–1222, 1972.Google Scholar
  17. Reasenberg, P. and K. Aki, A precise, continuous measurement of seismic velocity for monitoring in situ stress, J. Geophys. Res., 79, 5412–5426, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Saeki, M., Theoretical study of the ability of the ACROSS source to generate seismic wave field, MSc., University of Tokyo, Tokyo 2000.Google Scholar
  19. Saiga, A., Y. Hiramatsu, T. Ooida, and K. Yamaoka, Spatial variation in the crustal anisotropy and its temporal variation associated with the moderate size earthquake in the Tokai region, central Japan, Geophys. J. Int., 154, 695–705, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sato, H., Temporal change in scattering and attenuation associated with the earthquake occurrence—A review of recent studies on coda waves, Pure Appl. Geophys., 126, 465–497, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Scholz, C. H., M. Wyss, and Y. P. Aggarwal, The physical basis for earthquake prediction, Science, 181, 803–810, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Semenov, A. N., Variation in the travel-time of transverse and longitudinal waves before violent earthquakes, Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Phys. Solid Earth, 3, 245–248, 1969.Google Scholar
  23. TRIES, Geophysical log of TGR350; Tono Research Institute of Earthquake Science, 2001.Google Scholar
  24. Yamamura, K., O. Sano, H. Utada, Y. Takei, S. Nakao, and Y. Fukao, Longterm observation of in situ seismic velocity and attenuation, J. Geophys. Res., 108, B6, 2317, 10.1029/2002JB002005, 2003.Google Scholar
  25. Yamaoka, K. and R. Ikuta, Feasibility of reflection monitoring for plate coupling using ACROSS System, Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Active Monitoring in the Solid Earth Geophysics, 126–129, 2004.Google Scholar
  26. Yamaoka, K., T. Kunitomo, K. Miyakawa, K. Kobayashi, and M. Kumazawa, A trial for monitoring temporal variation of seismic velocity with ACROSS system, Island Arc, 10, 336–347, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yoshida, Y., H. Ueno, and Y. Ishikawa, The observation and analysis of ACROSS signals by seismic networks—Determination of the transfer function. Proc. 1st Int. Workshop Active Monitoring Solid Earth Geophysics, 258–261, 2004.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Atsushi Saiga
    • 1
  • Koshun Yamaoka
    • 2
  • Takahiro Kunitomo
    • 3
  • Toshiki Watanabe
    • 4
  1. 1.Graduate School of ScienceNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan
  2. 2.Earthquake Prediction Research Center, Earthquake Research InstituteUniversity of TokyoTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Tono Geoscience CenterJapan Nuclear Cycle Development InstituteGifuJapan
  4. 4.Research Center for Seismology, Volcanology and Disaster MitigationNagoya UniversityNagoyaJapan

Personalised recommendations