Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 52, Issue 12, pp 1227–1233 | Cite as

Unusual behaviour of the IGRF during the 1945–1955 period

  • Wen-yao Xu
Open Access


The International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) for 1900–2000 is testedin this paper. A peculiar behaviour is found in the time variations of higher-degree coefficients of the IGRF models. During the 1945–1955 period the spherical harmonic coefficients g n m and h n m with n > 7 show unusual jumps, while their variations before and after this period are quite smooth. These irregular variations have little effect on the main features of the surface magnetic pattern. However, when we extrapolate the field pattern downward through the insulating mantle to the core-mantle boundary (CMB), the contributions of the higher-degree coefficients become more important and are likely to affect the shape of the geomagnetic energy spectrum, distribution of magnetic flux, and magnetic determination of the conducting core radius. It seems necessary to re-examine and revise these coefficients in the IGRF models.


Secular Variation Core Radius Unusual Behaviour Truncation Level International Geomagnetic Reference Field 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Baldwin, R. T. and R. A. Langel, Tables and maps of the DGRF 1985 and IGRF 1990, in IAGA Bulletin, 54, 183 pp., 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Barraclough, D. R., International Geomagnetic Reference Field revision, Nature, 318, 316, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barraclough, D. R., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the fourth generation, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 279–292, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, C. E., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: the seventh gen eration, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 123–148, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benton, E. R., R. H. Estes, R. A. Langel, and L. A. Muth, Sensitivity of selected geomagnetic properties to truncation level of spherical harmonic expansions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 254–257, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bloxham, J. and D. Gubbins, The secular variation of Earth’s magnetic field, Nature, 317, 777–781, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bloxham, J. and A. Jackson, Fluid flow near the surface of Earth’s outer core, Rev. Geophys., 29, 97–120, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bloxham, J. and A. Jackson, Time-dependent mapping of the magnetic field at the core-mantle boundary, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 19537–19563, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cain, J. C., Z. Wang, D. R. Schmitz, and J. Meyer, The geomagnetic spectrum for 1980 and core-crustal separation, Geophys. J., 97, 443–447, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, S. and J. Bartels, Geomagnetism, 1049 pp., Oxford University Press, London, 1940.Google Scholar
  11. Ducruix, J., V. Courtillot, and J.L. LeMouel, The late 1960s secular impulse, the eleven year magnetic variation and the electrical conductivity of the deep mantle, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 61, 73–94, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hide, R., How to locate the electrically conducting fluid core of a planet from external magnetic observations, Nature, 271, 640–641, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hide, R. and S. R. C. Malin, On the determination of the size of the earth’s core from observations of the geomagnetic secular variation, Proc. R. Soc. Lond., A347, 15–33, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hulot, G., J. L. Le Mouel, and J. Wahr, Taking into account truncation problems and geomagnetic model accuracy in assessing computed flows at the core-mantle boundary, Geophys. J. Int., 108, 224–246, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. IAGA Commission 2 Working Group 4, International Geomagnetic Refer ence Field 1965.0, J. Geophys. Res., 74, 4407–4408, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. IAGA Division 1 Study Group on Geomagnetic Reference Field, Interna tional Magnetic Reference Field 1975, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 27, 437–439, 1975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IAGA Division 1, Working Group 1, International geomagnetic reference field: DGRF1965, DGRF1970, DGRF 1975 and IGRF 1980, EOS Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, 62, 1169–1170, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IAGA Division 1, Working Group 1, International geomagnetic reference field revision 1985, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 37, 1157–1163, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. IAGA Division 1, Working Group 1, International geomagnetic reference field revision 1987, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 39, 773–779, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. IAGA Division 5, Working Group 8, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1991 revision, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 43, 1007–1012, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. IAGA Division 5, Working Group 8, International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1995 revision, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 318–321, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. IAGA Division 5, Working Group 8, International Geomagnetic Reference Field 2000, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 259–262, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Langel, R. A., The main field, in Geomagnetism, edited by J. A. Jacobs, Vol. 1, pp. 249–512, Academic Press, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  24. Langel, R. A., International geomagnetic reference field: the sixth genera tion, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 44, 679–707, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, A geomagnetic field spectrum, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 250–253, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Langel, R. A. and R. H. Estes, Derivation of proposed International Geomagnetic Reference Field models for 1945, 1950, 1955, and 1960, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 48, 293–305, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Langel, R. A., D. R. Barraclough, D. J. Kerridge, V. P. Golovkov, T. J. Sabaka, and R. H. Estes, Definitive IGRF models for 1945, 1950, 1955, and 1960, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 40, 645–702, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lowes, F. J., Mean square values on sphere of spherical harmonic vector field, J. Geophys. Res., 71, 2179, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lowes, F. J., Spatial power spectrum of the main geomagnetic field and extrapolation to the core, Geophys. J. R. Astr. Soc., 36, 717–730, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macmillan, S. and C. E. Barton, Magnetic field maps for IGRF 1995, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 149–156, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malin, S. R. C., B. M. Hodder, and D. R. Barraclough, Geomagnetic secular variation: A jerk in 1970. Publicado en volumen commemorativo 75 aniversario del observatorio del Ebro, (75th anniversary volume of Ebro observatory), edited by J. O. Cardus, pp. 239–256, Tarragona, 1983.Google Scholar
  32. Olson, P. and J. Aurnou, A polar vortex in the Earth’s core, Nature, 402, 170–173, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pais, A. and G. Hulot, Lengthof day decade variations, torsional oscillations and inner core superrotation: evidence from recovered core surface zonal flows, Phys. Earth Planet. Int., 118, 291–316, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sabaka, T. J., R. A. Langel, R. T. Baldwin, and J. A. Conrad, The geo magnetic field 1900–1995, including the large-scale field from magnetospheric sources, and the NASA candidate models for the 1995 revision, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 157–206, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Verosub, K. L. and A. Cox, Changes in the total magnetic energy external to the earth’s core, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 23, 235–242, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Voorhies, C. V. and E. R. Benton, Pole-strength of the Earth from MAGSAT and magnetic determination of the core radius, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 258–261, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zmuda, A. J., The International Geomagnetic Reference Field, 1965.0, in IAGA Bulletin, 28, World Magnetic Survey, IUGG, Paris, 1971.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations