Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 50, Issue 2, pp 119–127 | Cite as

First results of all-sky imaging from India

  • G. K. Mukherjee
  • L. Carlo
  • S. H. Mahajan
  • P. T. Patil
Open Access


A CCD based all-sky (180° field view) airglow imaging system was operated from a low latitude station, Kolhapur (16.8° N, 74.2° E; 10.6° N dip lat.) in India to map the thermospheric motion and to study the low latitude ionospheric irregularities by measuring the nightglow signatures at 630 nm. In general, all-sky imaging techniques offer broad, instantaneous coverage (2.5 million sq km area at 150° field of view at 300 km height) of the spatial and temporal characteristics of the airglow features from the selected layers of the thermosphere and ionosphere system. In addition to the all-sky camera, photometer and radio scintillation observations together with ionospheric soundings were carried out from Kolhapur to verify the signature of small scale as well as large scale size F-region irregularities. Initial results from these measurements display good examples of north-south motion of the thermosphere with apparent drift speeds of 143–200 m/s during geomagnetically quiet nights. The north-south aligned (>1000 km) bands of plasma depletions or bubbles with east-west dimension of 50–250 km moving with drift speed of 140 m/s towards east have been observed. The zonal component of plasma drift speed matches well with the eastward component of the neutral speed computed using Hedin’s recent model. However, the meridional components of plasma drift speed are generally higher than the components of the neutral wind speed computed using the model. The results confirm the earlier quantitative investigations of equatorial depletion characteristics from Brazil and elsewhere.


Neutral Wind Plasma Bubble Indian Standard Time Plasma Depletion Airglow Intensity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abdu, M. A., J. H. A. Sobral, Y. Nakamura, and C. J. Zamlutti, Equatorial plasma bubble zonal velocity height gradient from spaced VHF polarimeter and scanning 630 nm measurements, Geophys. Res. Lett., 14, 965–967, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abreu, V. J. and W. R. Skinner, Inversion of Fabry-Perot CCD images: Application to doppler shift measurements, Appl. Opt., 28, 3382–3388, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, D. N. and M. Mendillo, Ionospheric conditions affecting the evolution of equatorial plasma depletions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 10, 541–544, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumgardner, J. and S. Karandanis, CCD system using video graphics controller, Electronic Imaging, 3, 28–31, 1984.Google Scholar
  5. Bittencourt, J. A., Y. Sahai, P. R. Fugundes, and H. Takahashi, Simultaneous observations of equatorial F-region plasma depletions and the thermospheric winds, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 59(9), 1049–1059, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Carman, E. H., Equatorial depletions in the 630.0 nm airglow at Vanimo, Planet. Space Sci., 31, 355–362, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyson, P. L. and R. F. Benson, Topside sounder observations of equatorial bubbles, Geophys. Res. Lett., 5, 795–798, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fejer, B. G., D. T. Farley, C. A. Gonzales, R. F. Woodman, and C. Calderon, F region east-west drifts at Jicamarca, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 215–218, 1981.Google Scholar
  9. Fukunishi, H., Report on ionosphere-thermosphere coupling and response to energy and momentum inputs, in Solar Terrestrial Environmental Research in Japan, Committee on Solar-Terrestrial Environment Research, Nagoya University, Japan, 18, 21–23, 1996.Google Scholar
  10. Hake, Jr., Studies of the motion of equatorial 630.0 nm airglow depletions, Planet. Space Sci., 29, 1267–1272, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hedin, A. E., M. A. Biondi, R. G. Burnside, G. Hernandez, R. M. Johnson, T. L. Killeen, C. Mazaudier, J. W. Meriwether, J. E. Salah, R. J. Sica, R. W. Smith, N. W. Spencer, V. B. Wickwar, and T. S. Virdi, Revised global model of thermosphere winds using satellite and ground based observations, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 7657–7688, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hedin, A. E., E. L. Fleming, A. H. Manson, F. J. Schmidin, S. K. Avery, R. R. Clark, S. J. Franke, G. J. Fraser, T. Tsuda, F. Vial, and R. A. Vincent, Emperical wind model for the upper, middle and lower atmosphere, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 58(13), 1421–1427, 1996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heelis, R. A., P. C. Kendall, R. J. Moffett, D. W. Windle, and H. Rishbeth, Electric Coupling of the E- and F-regions and it’s effect of F region drifts and winds, Planet. Space Sci., 22, 743–756, 1974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Herrero, F. A., N. W. Spencer, and H. G. Mayr, Thermosphere and F-region plasma dynamics in the equatorial region, Adv. Space Res., 13(1), 201–220, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Janesick, J. and M. Blouke, Sky on a chip: The fabulous CCD, Sky and Telescope, 9, 238–242, 1987.Google Scholar
  16. Malcolm, R., C. Miles, and B. A. Tinsley, Field aligned observations of trans-equatorial bubbles from Rarotonga in 1969–1970, Geophys. Res. Lett., 11, 665–668, 1984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClure, J. P., W. B. Hanson, and J. H. Hoffman, Plasma bubbles and irregularities in the equatorial ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 82, 2650–2656, 1977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mendillo, M. and J. Baumgardner, Airglow characteristics of equatorial plasma depletions, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 7641–7652, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mendillo, M. and A. Tyler, Geometry of depleted plasma regions in the equatorial ionosphere, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 5778–5782, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mendillo, M., J. Baumgardner, and P. J. Sultan, Optical and radar techniques applied to chemical release in active experiments in the ionosphere/thermosphere system, Adv. Space Res., 10, 8–15, 1989.Google Scholar
  21. Mendillo, M., J. Baumgardner, X.-Q. Pi, P. J. Sultan, and R. T. Tsunoda, Onset conditions for equatorial spread-F, J. Geophys. Res., 97, 13865–13876, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moore, J. G. and E. J. Weber, OI 6300 and 7774 Å airglow measurements of equatorial plasma depletions, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 43, 851–858, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mukherjee, G. K. and P. L. Dyson, A filter tilting photometer for nightglow measurement of 630.0 nm emission line, Ind. J. Radio Space Phys., 21, 212–217, 1992.Google Scholar
  24. Mukherjee, G. K., L. Carlo, and P. T. Patil, First all-sky imaging observations from India, South Pacific STEP workshop, New Castle, Australia, July 3–9, 1993.Google Scholar
  25. Mukherjee, G. K., L. Carlo, and P. T. Patil, All-sky imaging observations from low latitudes, in Proc. Saha Memorial Symposium on Science and Technology (Plasma93), edited by I. M. L. Das, pp. 219–222, Allied Publishers, New Delhi (India), 1994.Google Scholar
  26. Muldrew, D. B., Characteristics of ionospheric bubbles determined from aspect sensitive scatter spread-F observed with Alouette 1., J. Geophys. Res., 85, 2115–2123, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Rishbeth, H., The F-layer dynamo, Planet. Space Sci., 19, 263–267, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rohrbaugh, R. P., W. B. Hansen, B. A. Tinsley, B. L. Cragin, J. P. McClure, and A. L. Broadfoot, Images of transequatorial bubbles based on field-aligned airglow observations from Haleakala in 1984–1986, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 6763–6770, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sahai, Y., J. A. Bittencourt, N. R. Teixeira, and H. Takahashi, Plasma irregularities in the tropical F-region detected by OI 7774 Å and 6300 Å nightglow measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 86, 3496–3500, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Sahai, Y., J. Aarons, M. Mendillo, J. Baumgardner, J. A. Bittencourt, and H. Takahashi, OI 630 nm imaging observations of equatorial plasma depletions at 16° S dip latitude, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 56, 1461–1475, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sahai, Y., J. A. Bittencourt, J. H. A. Sobral, P. R. Fagundes, and H. Takahashi, Observations of ionospheric plasma depletions using OI 630.0 nm nightglow imaging, Revista Bras de Geophys, 14(1), 15–28, 1996.Google Scholar
  32. Sinha, H. S. S., R. N. Misra, H. Chandra, Multiple-wavelength optical imaging of ionospheric plasma depletions, Ind. J. Radio Space Phys., 25, 44–52, 1996.Google Scholar
  33. Sobral, J. H. A., M. A. Abdu, and Y. Sahai, Equatorial plasma bubble eastward velocity characteristics from scanning airglow photometer measurements over Cachoeira Paulista, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 47, 895–900, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sobral, J. H. A., M. A. Abdu, and Y. Sahai, Latitudinal gradient in the plasma zonal velocities as observed by scanning 630-nm airglow measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 8253–8257, 1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tinsley, B. A., Field aligned airglow observations of trans-equatorial bubbles in the tropical F-region, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 44, 547–557, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tsunoda, R. T., On the spatial relationship of 1-m equatorial spread F irregularities and plasma bubbles, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 185–190, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weber, E. J., J. Buchau, R. H. Eather, and S. B. Mende, North-south aligned equatorial airglow depletions, J. Geophys. Res., 83, 712–716, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Weber, E. J., J. Buchau, and J. G. Moore, Airborne studies of equatorial F-layer ionospheric irregularities, J. Geophys. Res., 85, 4631–4641, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber, E. J., H. C. Brinton, J. Buchau, and J. G. Moore, Coordinated airborne and satellite measurements of equatorial plasma depletions, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 10503–10513, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Weber, E. J., J. Aarons, and A. L. Johnson, Conjugate studies of an isolated equatorial irregularity region, J. Geophys. Res., 88, 3175–3180, 1983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Woodman, R. F. and C. La Hoz, Radar observations of F region equatorial irregularities, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 5447–5466, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Yeh, K. C., H. Soicher, C. H. Liu, and E. Bonelli, Ionospheric bubbles observed by the Faraday rotation method at Natal, Brazil, Geophys. Res. Lett., 6, 473–475, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zalesak, S. T. and S. L. Ossakow, Mem. Repl. 4899, Naval Res. Lab., Washington, D.C., 1982.Google Scholar
  44. Zalesak, S. T., S. L. Ossakow, and P. K. Chaturvedi, Nonlinear equatorial spread F: The effect of neutral winds and background Pederson conductivity, J. Geophys. Res., 87, 151–155, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • G. K. Mukherjee
    • 1
  • L. Carlo
    • 1
  • S. H. Mahajan
    • 1
  • P. T. Patil
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of GeomagnetismColaba, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations