Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 58, Issue 4, pp 439–449 | Cite as

Using global magnetospheric models for simulation and interpretation of Swarm external field measurements

  • T. Moretto
  • S. Vennerstrøm
  • N. Olsen
  • L. Rastätter
  • J. Raeder
Open Access
Article

Abstract

We have used a global model of the solar wind magnetosphere interaction to model the high latitude part of the external contributions to the geomagnetic field near the Earth. The model also provides corresponding values for the electric field. Geomagnetic quiet conditions were modeled to provide simulated external contributions relevant for internal field modeling. These have proven very valuable for the design and planning of the upcoming multi-satellite Swarm mission. In addition, a real event simulation was carried out for a moderately active time interval when observations from the Ørsted and CHAMP sattelites were available. Comparisons between the simulation results and the satellite observations for this event demonstrate the current level of validity of the global model. We find that the model reproduces quite well the region 1 current system and nightside region 2 currents whereas it consistently underestimates the dayside region 2 currents and overestimates the horizontal ionospheric closure currents in the dayside polar cap. Furthermore, with this example we illustrate the great benefit of utilizing the global model for the interpretation of Swarm external field observations and, likewise, the potential of using Swarm measuremnets to test and improve the global model.

Key words

Ionospheric currents field-aligned currents global magnetospheric simulation low-altitude satellites 

References

  1. Backus, G., Poloidal and toroidal fields in geomagnetic field modeling, Rev. Geophys., 24, 75, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Zeeuw, D. L., S. Sazykin, R. A. Wolf, T. I. Gombosi, A. J. Ridley, and G. Toth, Coupling of global MHD code and an inner mag-netospheric model: Initial results, J. Geophys. Res., 109, A12219, doi:10.1029/2003JA010366, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Engels, U. and N. Olsen, Computation of magnetic fields within source regions of ionospheric and magnetospheric currents, J. Atm. Sol.-Terr. Physics, 60, 1585, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Friis-Christensen, E., H. Lühr, and G. Hulot, Swarm: A constellation to study the Earth’s magnetic field, Earth Planets Space, 58, this issue, 351–358, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Friis-Christensen, E., Y. Kamide, A. D. Richmond, and S. Matshusita, Interplanetary magnetic field control of high-latitude electric fields and currents determined from Greenland magnetometer data, J. Geophys. Res., 90, 1325, 1985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Iijima, T. and T. A. Potemra, The amplitude distribution of field-aligned currents at northern high latitudes observed by Triad, J. Geophys. Res., 81, 2165, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Keller, K. A., M. Hesse, M. Kuznetsova, L. Rastätter, T. Moretto, T. I. Gombosi, and D. L. DeZeeuw, Global MHD modeling of the impact of a solar wind pressure change, J. Geophys. Res., 107, 1126, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kelley, M. C., The Earth’s Ionosphere, Academic Press, New York, 1989.Google Scholar
  9. Knight, S., Parallel electric fields, Planet. Space Sci., 21, 741, 1972.Google Scholar
  10. Korth, H., B. J. Anderson, M. J. Wiltberger, J. G. Lyon, and P. C. Anderson, Intercomparison of ionospheric electrodynamics from the Iridium constellation with global MHD simulations J. Geophys. Res., 109, doi:10.1029/2004JA010428, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. Lotko, W., Inductive magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, J. Atm. Sol.-Terr. Physics, 66, 1443, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Moen, J. and A. Brekke, The solar flux influence on quiet time conductances in the auroral ionosphere, Geophys. Res. Lett., 20, 971, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Neubert, T., M. Mandea, G. Hulot, R. von Frese, F Primdahl, J. L. Jørgensen, E. Friis-Christensen, P. Stauning, N. Olsen, and T. Risbo, Ørsted satellite captures high-precision geomagnetic field data, EOS, 82, 81, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ohtani, S.-I. and J. Raeder, Tail current surge: New insights from a global MHD simulation and comparison with satellite observations, J. Geo-phys. Res., 109, doi:10.1029/2002JA009750, 2004.Google Scholar
  15. Papitashvili, V. O., F. Christiansen, and T. Neubert, A new model of field-aligned currents derived from high-precision satellite magnetic field data, Geophys. Res. Lett., 29, No. 14, doi:10.1029/2001GL014207, 2002.Google Scholar
  16. Raeder, J., Global Geospace Modeling: Tutorial and review, in Space Plasma Simulations, edited by J. Buchner, C. T. Dunn, and M. Scholer, 615 of Lecture notes in physics, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.Google Scholar
  17. Raeder, J., R. J. Walker, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, The structure of the distant geomagnetic tail during long periods of northward IMF, Geophys. Res. Lett., 22, 349, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Raeder, J., J. Berchem, M. Ashour-Abdalla, L. A. Frank, W. R. Paterson, K. L. Ackerson, S. Kokubun, and J. A. Slavin, Boundary layer formation in the magnetotail: Geotail observations and comparisons with a global MHD simulation, Geophys. Res. Lett., 24, 951, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Raeder, J., J. Berchem, and M. Ashour-Abdalla, The geospace environment modeling grand challenge: Results from a global geospace circulation model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 14787, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Raeder, J., Y. Wang, and T. Fuller-Rowell, Geomagnetic storm simulation with a coupled magnetosphere-ionosphere-thermosphere model, in Space Weather, AGU Geophys. Monogr. Ser, edited by P. Song, G. Sis-coe, and H. J. Singer, Vol. 125, pp. 377, American Geophysical Union, 2001.Google Scholar
  21. Reigber, C., H. Lühr, and P. Schwintzer, CHAMP Mission Status, Advances in Space Research, 30(2), 129, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ridley, A. J., A. D. Richmond, T. I. Gombosi, D. L. De Zeeuw, and C. R. Clauer, Ionospheric control of the magnetospheric configuration: Thermospheric neutral winds, J. Geophys. Res., 108(A8), 1328, doi:10.1029/2002JA009464, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ritter, P. and H. Lühr, Curl-B technique applied to Swarm constellation for determining field-aligned currents, Earth Planets Space, 58, this issue, 463–476, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robinson, R. M., R. R. Vondrak, K. Miller, T. Dabbs, and D. Hardy, On calculating ionospheric conductances from the flux and energy of precipitating electrons, J. Geophys. Res., 92, 2565, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ruohoniemi, J. M., S. G. Shepherd, and R. A. Greenwald, The response of the high-latitude ionosphere to IMF variations, J. Atm. Sol.-Terr. Physics, 64, 159, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sabaka, T. J., N. Olsen, and R. A. Langel, A comprehensive model of the quiet-time near-Earth magnetic field: Phase 3, Geophys. J. Int., 151, 32, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stern, D. P., Representation of magnetic fields in space, Rev. Geophys., 14, 199, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vennerstrøm, S., T. Moretto, N. Olsen, E. Friis-Christensen, A. M. Stampe, and J. F. Watermann, Field-aligned currents in the dayside cusp and polar cap region during northward IMF, J. Geophys. Res., 107, doi:10.1029/2001JA009162, 2002.Google Scholar
  29. Vennerstrøm, S., T. Moretto, L. Rastätter, and J. Raeder, Field-aligned currents during northward interplanetary magnetic field: Morphology and causes, J. Geophys. Res., 110(A6), doi:10.1029/2004JA010802, 2005.Google Scholar
  30. Vennerstrom, S., T. Moretto, L. Rastätter, and J. Raeder, Modeling and analysis of solar wind generated contributions to the near-Earth magnetic field, Earth Planets Space, 58, this issue, 451–461, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Weimer, D. R., Models of high-latitude electric potentials derived with a least error fit of spherical harmonic coefficients, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 19, 595, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weimer, D. R., An improved model of ionospheric electric potentials including substorm perturbations and application to the GEM November 24, 1996 event, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 407, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Moretto
    • 1
  • S. Vennerstrøm
    • 2
  • N. Olsen
    • 2
  • L. Rastätter
    • 1
  • J. Raeder
    • 3
  1. 1.NASA Goddard Space Flight CenterGreenbeltUSA
  2. 2.Danish National Space CenterCopenhagenDenmark
  3. 3.Space Science CenterUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations