Earth, Planets and Space

, Volume 55, Issue 3, pp 131–137 | Cite as

Westward drift in secular variation of the main geomagnetic field inferred from IGRF

Open Access


Westward drift is apparent not only in the Main Geomagnetic field (MG-field) but also in its Secular Variation (SV-field). The eighth generation of International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) is used in this paper to study westward drift in the SV-field. The magnetic potential of the SV-field shows a simple spatial distribution and steady variation tendency. An average westward drift rate (0.43 degree/year) is obtained from the SV potential for 1900–2005, which is much greater than the slow westward drift of the MG-field itself (about 0.15 degree/year) for the same period. Magnetic components Y and Z of the SV-field show complicated patterns, from which the average rates of westward drift are roughly estimated as 0.39 degree/year and 0.43 degree/year, respectively. The spatial distribution of component X shows much more complicated pattern with many small-scale vertices, especially for the period 1940–1960, giving a larger drift rate (0.51 degree/year). The unusual behaviors of the high-degree Gauss coefficients in IGRF 1945, 1950 and 1955 slightly affect the spatial pattern of the potential, although they greatly distort the distribution of components X, Y and Z.


Drift Rate Secular Variation Magnetic Component Earth Planet Space Magnetic Potential 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Barton, C. E., International Geomagnetic Reference Field: The Seventh Generation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 49, 123–148, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Briggs, B. H., On the analysis of moving pattern in geophysics—I. Correlation analysis, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 30, 1777–1788, 1968a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Briggs, B. H., On the analysis of moving pattern in geophysics—II. Dispersion analysis, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 30, 1789–1794, 1968b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bullard, E. C., C. Freedman, H. Gellman, and J. Nixon, The westward drift of the Earth’s magnetic field, Thil. Trans. Roy. Soc, A243, 67–92, 1950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Halley, E., An account of the cause of the change of the variation of the magnetical needle; with an hypothesis of the structure of the internal parts of the Earth, Thil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond, 17, 563–578, 1692.Google Scholar
  6. IAGA Division 5, Working Group 8, International Geomagnetic Reference Field 2000, Geophys. J. Int., 141, 259, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jault, D., C. Gire, and J. L. Le Mouel, Westward drift, core motions and exchanges of angular momentum between core and mantle, Nature, 333, 353–356, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Langel, R. A., The Main Field, in Geomagnetism, Vol. 1, edited by J. A. Jacobs, pp. 249–512, Academic Press, London, 1987.Google Scholar
  9. Malin, S. R. C., Geomagnetic secular variation and its changes, 1942.5 to 1962.5, Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc., 17, 415–441, 1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Malin, S. R. C. and I. Saunder, Rotation of the Earth’s magnetic field, Nature, 248, 403–405, 1973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mandea, M. and S. Macmillan, International Geomagnetic Reference Field—the eighth generation, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1119–1124, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Matsushima, M. and Y. Honkura, Fluctuation of the standing and drifting parts of the Earth’s magnetic field, Geophys. J., 94, 35–50, 1988.Google Scholar
  13. Tank, S. B., Rotation of the geomagnetic field about an optimum pole, Geophys. J. Int., 140, 461–464, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wei, Z.-G. and W.-Y. Xu, Westward drift of the geomagnetic anomaly in east Asia, Chinese J. Geophys., 43(1), 49–56, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Wei, Z.-G. and W.-Y. Xu, Drift and intensity variations of the geomagnetic field, Chinese J. Geophys., 44(4), 496–505, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wei, Z.-G. and W.-Y. Xu, Latitude-dependence and dispersion of the westward drift in the geomagnetic field, Chinese Sci. Bull., 47(4), 330–333, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu, W.-Y., Unusual behaviour of The IGRF during the 1945–1955 period, Earth Planets Space, 52, 1227–1233, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Xu, W.-Y., Revision of the high-degree Gauss coefficients in the IGRF 1945–1955 models by using natural orthogonal component analysis, Earth Planets Space, 54, 753–761, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yukutake, T., The westward drift of the magnetic field of the earth, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 40, 1–65, 1962. Yukutake, T., The drift velocity of the geomagnetic secular variation, J. Geomag. Geoelectr., 20, 403–414, 1968.Google Scholar
  20. Yukutake, T., A stratified core motion inferred from geomagnetic secular variations, Phys. Earth Plan. Int., 24, 253–258, 1981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yukutake, T. and H. Tachinaka, The westward drift of the geomagnetic secular variation, Bull. Earthquake Res. Inst., 46, 1075–1102, 1968.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society of Geomagnetism and Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences (SGEPSS); The Seismological Society of Japan; The Volcanological Society of Japan; The Geodetic Society of Japan; The Japanese Society for Planetary Sciences. 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Geology and GeophysicsChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations