Advertisement

Effects of pressure-support ventilation with different levels of positive end-expiratory in a mild model of acute respiratory distress syndrome

  • PAF Magalhães
  • GDA Padilha
  • L Moraes
  • CL Santos
  • LB de Andrade
  • MGPdA Magalhães
  • MDCMB Duarte
  • PRM Rocco
  • PL Silva
Open Access
Poster presentation
  • 198 Downloads

Keywords

Mean Arterial Pressure Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Ventilator Strategy Lung Mechanic Baseline Data Collection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Introduction

Pressure-support ventilation improves lung mechanics, blood gas exchange, hemodynamics, and work of breathing (WOB) in mild acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [1, 2]. Nevertheless, those beneficial effects could be dependent of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied during mechanical ventilation. So far, no study has compared pressure-support ventilation (PSV) with pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) in different PEEP levels.

Objective

To compare PSV and PCV target to protective tidal volume (VT=6ml/kg) using two PEEP levels (2 and 5 cmH2O) in a mild ARDS model.

Methods

Thirty-two male Wistar rats (310 ± 19 g) were submitted to intratracheal Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (200µg in 200µl of saline) instillation. After 24 hours, animals were anesthetized, tracheotomized, and their lungs were mechanically ventilated in PSV to achieve VT = 6 ml/kg. After baseline data collection, animals were randomly divided to four groups (n=8/group):
  1. 1)

    PCV + PEEP = 2 cmH2O (PCV-P2);

     
  2. 2)

    PCV + PEEP = 5 cmH2O (PCV-P5);

     
  3. 3)

    PSV + PEEP = 2 cmH2O (PSV-P2);

     
  4. 4)

    PSV + PEEP = 5 cmH2O (PSV-P5).

     

Animals were ventilated for 2 hours. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial blood gases, peak airway (Ppeak,RS) and peak transpulmonary (Ppeak,L) pressures, and pressure-time product (PTP), as a surrogate of WOB, were evaluated.

Results

All animals showed better oxygenation along time, regardless of ventilator strategy. Animals submitted to PCV, regardless of PEEP, received more colloids to keep MAP>70 mmHg. Ppeak,RS, and Ppeak,L were higher in animals submitted to PEEP = 5 cmH2O than PEEP = 2 cmH2O, independently of pressure-controlled, and pressure-support ventilator strategies. Nevertheless, at PEEP = 5 cmH2O, but not at PEEP = 2 cmH2O, animals submitted to PSV showed lower Ppeak,RS, and Ppeak,L compared to PCV animals (PSV-P5:11.2 ± 1.9 cmH2O vs PCV-P5:15.3 ± 1.4 cmH2O, p < 0.05). In accordance, PTP was lower in animals submitted to PEEP = 5 cmH2O compared to PEEP = 2 cmH2O during PSV (PSV-P5:0.08 ± 0.03 cmH2O.s vs PSV-P2:0.22 ± 0.09 cmH2O.s, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

In a mild ARDS model, pressure-support ventilation is associated to better hemodynamics, lung mechanics, and it seems to have a dependent effect of the adjusted PEEP level, as depicted by work of breathing.

Grant Acknowledgment

CNPq, FAPERJ, CAPES, PRONEX, MS-DECIT

References

  1. 1.
    Guldner A, Pelosi P, Gama de Abreu M: Spontaneous breathing in mild and moderate versus severe acute respiratory distress syndrome. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2014, 20 (1): 69-76. 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000055.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Grinnan DC, Truwit JD: Clinical review: Respiratory mechanics in spontaneous and assisted ventilation. Crit Care. 2005, 9 (5): 472-484. 10.1186/cc3516.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Magalhães et al.; 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • PAF Magalhães
    • 1
    • 2
  • GDA Padilha
    • 1
  • L Moraes
    • 1
  • CL Santos
    • 1
  • LB de Andrade
    • 2
  • MGPdA Magalhães
    • 2
  • MDCMB Duarte
    • 2
  • PRM Rocco
    • 1
  • PL Silva
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal University of Rio de JaneiroRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Professor Fernando Figueira Mother and Child InstituteRecifeBrazil

Personalised recommendations