Blood transfusion requirements and filter longevity with regional citrate anticoagulation compared with heparin

  • E Burford
  • E Walter
  • A Beverly
Open Access
Poster presentation


Citrate Heparin Renal Replacement Therapy Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy Local Practice 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Citrate is the recommended anticoagulant for continuous renal replacement therapy (RRT) [1], and is thought to confer numerous benefits, including more continuous hours of filtration, fewer total circuits used, less overall cost and maybe improved patient and kidney survival when compared with heparin anticoagulation [2]. Our ICU changed from heparin to citrate anticoagulation in June 2014. Our unit uses a transfusion trigger of 7g/dl [3] unless the clinical situation dictates otherwise.


This observational study is to investigate blood transfusion requirements and haemofilter set life before and after the change from systemic heparin to citrate regional anticoagulation, to add to growing international evidence, and to inform local practice.


Data were collected on set life and the number of blood transfusions patients received during the period of filtration, and in the 24 hours afterwards. Data on patients anticoagulated with heparin were collected retrospectively up until the day of changing to citrate. Data during citrate anticoagulation were collected prospectively, from the day of changing, onwards.


6 months of filtration with heparin and 3 months of citrate were observed. 97 patients required RRT (65 with heparin, 28 with citrate, 4 with both), for a total of 556 days. Table one shows the comparison between heparin and citrate. There was no difference in the average duration of filtration required between the 2 systems. Filter life increased from 0.86 days with heparin, to 1.55 days with citrate (p = 0.007 by Student t-test). The number of transfusions required fell from 0.33 units per day with heparin, to 0.25 units per day with citrate (p > 0.05).


Regional citrate anticoagulation increases filter life when compared with systemic heparinisation, with significant cost and other savings. There is a non-significant trend towards a reduction in blood transfusion requirements.
Table 1

Comparison of citrate with heparin anticoagulation.




Renal days



Median renal days per patient episode



Number of filters used



Total filter cost (•)



Renal days per filter



Filter cost per renal day (•)



Blood transfusions per day




  1. 1.
    Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. Kidney inter., Suppl. 2012, 2: 1-138. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney InjuryGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Kellum JA, Bellomo R: Clinical review: Anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement therapy - heparin or citrate?. Crit Care. 2010, 15 (1): 202-10.1186/cc9358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hébert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, Marshall J, Martin C, Pagliarello G, et al: A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial of Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care. N Engl J Med. 1999, 340 (6): 409-417. 10.1056/NEJM199902113400601.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Burford et al.; 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • E Burford
    • 1
  • E Walter
    • 1
  • A Beverly
    • 1
  1. 1.Royal Surrey County HospitalIntensive Care UnitGuildfordUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations