Accuracy of a subcutaneous continuous glucose management system in critically ill patients
- 202 Downloads
KeywordsGlucose Variability Grant Acknowledgment Interstitial Glucose Absolute Relative Difference Blood Glucose Variability
Continuous glucose management (CGM) has not yet been implemented to daily routine in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting. CGM systems aim to improve glycemic control, and consequently patient outcome.
The main purpose of this study was to evaluate accuracy of the subcutaneous Medtronic Sentrino® CGM system in critically ill patients.
Inclusion criteria were an expected length of stay in the ICU of at least 72h, age ≥ 18 years, and availability of informed consent given by patient or legal proxy. Sensors were inserted into subcutaneous tissue of the patient's thigh, quantifying interstitial glucose concentration based on glucose oxidase reaction. Measurements were collected for up to 72h, while calibrations took place every eight hours, as recommended by the manufacturer. Arterial blood glucose (BG) values determined by blood gas analyzer Radiometer ABL800 were used as reference. Accuracy was illustrated in Clarke-error-grid and Bland-Altman-Plot. Non-parametric tests were performed (Mann-Whitney U Test and Spearman´s Correlation). Ethic vote Charité EA2/095/14.
In our patients, subcutaneous CGM accuracy does not fulfill criteria specified in the consensus recommendations of the expert meeting published in 2013 (). Accuracy deteriorated in patients with high blood glucose variability, as well as in the hypo- and hyperglycemic range. Following our data, we cannot recommend a clinical use of the investigated device.
Preliminary study within ECCRN research award for clinical nutrion 2013.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.