Journal of Eating Disorders

, 1:O41 | Cite as

Defining recovery from anorexia nervosa: a Delphi study to explore practitioners' views

Open Access
Oral presentation


Health Promotion Disease Prevention Social Functioning Anorexia Nervosa Clinical Implication 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

There is no consensus as how best to define and measure recovery from anorexia nervosa (AN). Definitions of recovery vary vastly between studies, making them difficult to compare. This has been identified as a major barrier in the field. The aim of the current study was to explore how best to define and measure recovery according to expert researchers and clinicians. This research used the Delphi technique, a method used to gain consensus on an issue. Twenty leading international experts in the field completed three rounds of online questionnaires. This was a multi-stage process with each round building on the previous round until consensus was achieved amongst the panel. Preliminary findings have revealed that experts in the field define recovery from AN as more than the restoration of weight and absence of eating disordered behaviours. Participants suggested that recovery also includes experiencing normal levels of body dissatisfaction and improved quality of life and social functioning. Full findings are reported and the research and clinical implications for establishing a consensus definition in the field are discussed.

This abstract was presented in the Anorexia Nervosa – Characteristics and Treatment stream of the 2013 ANZAED Conference.

Copyright information

© Dawson et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The University of SydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations