Continued cardiopulmonary resuscitation during transport in a physician-based Emergency Medical System

  • Elín E Sigurðardóttir
  • Søren L Nielsen
  • Freddy K Lippert
Open Access
Oral presentation


Emergency Medicine Cardiac Arrest Retrospective Analysis Medical System Ventricular Tachycardia 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


In the Capital Region of Denmark the physician-staffed Mobile Emergency Care Unit (MECU) is dispatched to all of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). OHCA is treated at the scene and patients are either successfully resuscitated at scene or resuscitation is not successful and the patient declared dead [1]. In a limited number of cases initial resuscitation is not successful and the patient is transferred to hospital with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).


The aim of this study is to characterize the patients with OHCA, who receive CPR during transport to hospital. A retrospective analysis is made of prospectively collected data from the database of the Copenhagen MECU for the period 1.1.2007–31.12.2008.


Over 24 months the MECU was dispatched to 1400 patients with OHCA. Of those, 49 (4%) met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. In 13 cases (27%) ROSC was achieved at hospital. Five patients (10%) survived to discharge from hospital. First ECG rhythm was ventricular fibrillation (VF)/pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT) in 45%, asystole in 27% and pulseless electrical activity (PEA) in 27%. Bystander CPR was reported in 22%. In 71% the arrest was witnessed, half of those (49%) were witnessed by the EMS. Presumed etiology was most commonly cardiac (65%). Reasons for transport with ongoing CPR were generally not reported. In 18% of the cases the patient had cardiac arrest during transport. In 31% it was documented that spontaneous circulation had been achieved intermittently or insufficiently or that the pupillary light reflex was intact.


Among patients with OHCA, treated by a physician-staffed MECU, relatively few are transported to hospital with ongoing CPR. Resuscitation in this selected group of patients is not futile and survival does not differ from reported survival after OHCA. Reasons for transporting patients with ongoing CPR are not known.


  1. 1.
    Horsted TI: Outcome of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest – why do physicians withhold resuscitation attempts?. Resuscitation. 2004, 63: 287-293. 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2004.05.005.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Sigurðardóttir et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2009

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elín E Sigurðardóttir
    • 1
  • Søren L Nielsen
    • 1
  • Freddy K Lippert
    • 1
  1. 1.Mobile Emergency Care Unit, RigshospitaletCopenhagen University HospitalDenmark

Personalised recommendations