Membranous nephropathy in a patient with hereditary angioedema: a case report
Hereditary angioedema is the commonest inherited disorder of the complement system and has been associated with several immune glomerular diseases. A case of nephrotic syndrome and renal impairment due to idiopathic membranous glomerulonephritis in a patient with hereditary angioedema has not been described before.
We present the first reported case of the association of membranous nephropathy and hereditary angioedema in a 43-year-old male Caucasian patient who presented with acute intestinal angioedema, hypertension, acute pancreatitis, renal impairment and generalised body swelling due to severe nephrotic syndrome. We present the challenges involved in the clinical management of the patient.
This patient's presentation with severe nephrotic syndrome, renal impairment and hypertension required aggressive treatment of the membranous nephropathy given the high risk for progression to end stage renal failure. The contraindication to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers in this patient, the lack of published evidence on the use of alkylating agents and other immunosuppressive agents in patients with hereditary angioedema and the lack of published data on the management of similar cases presented a clinical challenge in this patient's management.
KeywordsAcute Pancreatitis Nephrotic Syndrome Losartan Angioedema Danazol
angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor
angiotensin receptor blockers
- C1 INH
CC1 esterase inhibitor
erythrocyte sedimentation rate
normal reference range
systemic lupus erythematosus
Types of HAE and some associated immunoregulatory disorders
Some immunological conditions associated with all types of HAE
Low or absent C1 esterase inhibitor activity
Autosomal dominant. Constitutes 80–85% of cases
Systemic lupus erythematosus, mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis, autoimmune thyroiditis, rheumatoid arthritis, urticaria, other glomerulonephritides, Sjögren's syndrome, coagulopathies
Normal or raised activity of a dysfunctional C1 esterase inhibitor
Autosomal dominant. Constitutes 15–20% of the cases
Normal C1 esterase inhibitor level and function
X linked dominant newly described in women
The association of HAE with membranous glomerulonephritis has not been reported before, as we far as we know. The management of membranous glomerulonephritis in a patient with HAE would be challenging as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin 2 receptor blockers (ARBs) which effectively reduce proteinuria and slow the progression of the renal disease  cause angioedema which precludes their use in patients with HAE . Although alkylating agents such as chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide and the immunosuppressant cyclosporin are effective in the treatment of membranous nephropathy , their safety in a patient with HAE is unknown. The effect of renal failure on HAE and vice versa is also unknown. We report a case of nephrotic syndrome and renal failure due to membranous glomerulonephritis in a patient with HAE.
A 43-year-old Caucasian man was first diagnosed with hereditary angioedema in 1982 after admission to the intensive care unit with acute airway obstruction. Investigations were consistent with type 1 HAE, showing low C1 esterase inhibitor activity of 0.06 g/litre (normal range [NR] 0.2 to 0.65 g/litre), low complement C4 and normal complement C3. He was discharged on 17alpha-ethinyl testosterone (Danazol). He had had recurrent tonsillitis and abdominal pain from the age of 4 years leading to tonsillectomy and appendicectomy. He did not know his biological family. He had three further admissions with abdominal pain in the 1990s followed by full recovery after treatment with subcutaneous adrenaline and fresh frozen plasma.
He presented to our hospital in 2001 with acute abdominal pain and generalised body swelling. Clinical examination showed pallor, generalised oedema and abdominal tenderness. His blood pressure was 146/90 mmHg. He had bilateral pleural effusions which were confirmed by chest radiography. The rest of the examination was unremarkable. Urine dipstick was positive for protein, nitrates, leucocytes and a trace of blood. Urine culture was negative. Serum creatinine and serum albumin were 148 μmol/litre and 13 g/litre, respectively. 24 hour urine protein excretion was 6.3 g. Serum amylase was elevated (340 IU/litre [NR 35 to 110 U/l]). Serum lipids were also raised. Haemoglobin and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were 10 g/dl and 80 mm in the first hour (NR < 20 mm), respectively. The following autoimmune serological tests were negative: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, antinuclear antibodies, extractable nuclear antigen antibodies, other lupus serology, antiglomerular basement membrane antibodies and rheumatoid factor. Hepatitis screen (hepatitis B and C), liver function tests, serum protein electrophoresis, C-reactive protein (CRP) and all his other blood results were normal.
In conclusion, the patient thus had mild pancreatitis, acute intestinal angioedema and nephrotic syndrome and moderate renal impairment due to membranous glomerulonephritis.
He was treated with infusion of C1 INH concentrate, reducing course of prednisolone, starting at 60 mg daily slowly tapering to 10 mg daily over 2 weeks, bisoprolol 5 mg once daily as well as furosemide 80 mg daily reducing to 40 mg daily. His abdominal pain resolved within 24 hours and serum amylase normalised after 3 days. He was discharged 7 days later with serum creatinine of 168 μmol/litre and on losartan potassium which he tolerated. Proteinuria improved to 2 g per day within 2 weeks of discharge. He had no further attacks of angioedema for 4 weeks.
He was readmitted 4 weeks later with worsening nephrotic syndrome and abdominal pain and a rise of serum creatinine to 415 μmol/litre. Serum albumin was 10 g/litre while proteinuria was 10 g/day. The losartan was stopped. He was given an infusion of C1 INH concentrate and increased doses of prednisolone and furosemide. Cyclosporine was added. He was discharged 10 days later with serum creatinine and proteinuria of 293 μmol/litre and 2 g/day, respectively.
He remained stable on daily prednisolone 5 mg, furosemide 40 mg, bisoprolol 10 mg and cyclosporine 100 mg twice daily. At follow-up in the low clearance clinic 4 weeks later, proteinuria had improved to less than 1 g per day. Serum creatinine was 250 μmol/litre. He remained off the danazol because of the renal impairment.
The association of HAE with immunoregulatory disorders is well documented (Table 1). The commonest reported glomerular diseases associated with HAE are lupus nephritis and mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Brickman et al.  evaluated 157 patients manifesting features of autoimmunity. Nineteen patients had clinical immunoregulatory disorders of which five had glomerulonephritis, the majority of which were mesangiocapillary glomerulonephritis. Pan et al.  reported long-term follow-up of four cases of non-SLE glomerulonephritis, none of whom developed renal failure after 8 to 25 years of follow-up. Three members of the same family with HAE associated with IgA nephropathy have also been reported . To our knowledge, the association of HAE and membranous nephropathy has not been previously reported.
Our patient had had HAE for about 20 years before he presented with nephrotic syndrome. The HAE classically manifested in childhood and led to tonsillectomy and appendicectomy before the diagnosis, which is typical since with no suggestive family history, the condition can be misdiagnosed leading to patients having unnecessary surgery . His presentation with recurrent abdominal pain and respiratory problems, due to intestinal and upper airway angioedema, respectively, is typical. Acute pancreatitis is a recognised complication of the condition .
This case illustrates some of the challenges which may be involved in managing renal impairment and nephrotic syndrome due to membranous nephropathy in a patient with HAE. There are not much data on the effect of renal failure on HAE and, since angioedema causes fluid retention, this may complicate the management of fluid overload states in these patients. It may be difficult to distinguish between fluid overload and attacks of angioedema in patients with HAE and renal failure or nephrotic syndrome . Ohsawa et al. described a case with end stage renal disease due to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) who had difficult worsening fluid retention. This case illustrates the difficulties in controlling fluid overload as the attacks of angioedema worsened the fluid retention due to the end stage renal disease and nephrotic syndrome as in our patient .
Our patient had no evidence of SLE or any other immunological condition. His presentation with membranous nephropathy causing severe nephrotic syndrome, hypertension and renal impairment indicated a high risk for progression to end stage renal disease . He would, therefore, require aggressive treatment. There is clear evidence that ACEIs and/or ARBs effectively reduce proteinuria and delay the progression to end stage renal disease in membranous nephropathy . However, by interfering with the contact (kallikrein-kinin) system, ACEIs cause angioedema and are thus contraindicated in patients with any history of angioedema .
When ARBs were first used in clinical practice, they were thought to provide an alternative for use in people with ACEI induced cough and angioedema since they do not directly interfere with the contact (kallikrein-kinin) system. At the time this patient presented, there had been sporadic case reports of suspected ARB induced angioedema leading to advice for their use with caution in patients with a previous history of angioedema. Our assumption at that time was that losartan would be worth trying in this patient. Though the patient may have responded to the losartan given the initial improvement in proteinuria and renal function, he developed acute intestinal angioedema which improved on stopping the losartan and giving him C1 INH concentrate infusion. There have since been many more reported cases of angioedema associated with ARBs , hence their contraindication in people with HAE.
Given the high risk for progression to end stage renal failure in this patient, the treatment of the membranous nephropathy would require aggressive control of his blood pressure using antihypertensive drugs other than the contraindicated ACEIs and ARBs. He would also require alkylating agents such as chlorambucil and cyclophosphamide or the immunosuppressant cyclosporine  for the management of the membranous nephropathy.
The emergency treatment of HAE includes purified C1 INH concentrate infusion or fresh frozen plasma (contains C1 esterase inhibitor) and/or subcutaneous adrenaline. Corticosteroids and antihistamines are ineffective. For long-term prophylaxis, attenuated androgens such as 17alpha-ethinyl testosterone (Danazol) and stanozolol potent androgens such as oxandrolone and antifibrinolytic agents such as tranexamic acid and epsilon aminocaproic acid are effective  but their safety in patients with advanced renal disease is unclear.
Our patient required an increasing dosage of 17alpha-ethinyl testosterone (Danazol) as the frequency of the attacks of angioedema increased. However, with the development of advanced renal disease; he required more careful monitoring of the prophylactic treatment. He tolerated the cyclosporine , which we believe, has led to the improvement in the proteinuria and renal function. The prognosis of HAE is generally good with treatment . However, the membranous nephropathy causing renal impairment has worsened the overall prognosis of this patient who will most likely require renal replacement therapy in the future. The effect of dialysis and or renal transplantation on HAE will need to be carefully assessed. Currently, there are few data in the literature to inform the best management of this patient.
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images. A copy of the written consent is available for review by the Editor-in-Chief of this journal.
The authors acknowledge the Dudley Group of Hospital NHS Trust's Russells Hall Hospital Pathology department for providing the renal biopsy image and Dr Christina Reith from the Clinical Trial Service Unit at the University of Oxford for revising the manuscript critically.
- 11.Cattran DC, Alexopoulos E, Heering P, Hoyer PF, Johnston A, Meyrier A, Ponticelli C, Saito T, Choukroun G, Nachman P, Praga M, Yoshikawa N: Cyclosporin in idiopathic glomerular disease associated with the nephrotic syndrome: Workshop recommendations. Kidney Int. 2007, 72 (12): 1429-1447. 10.1038/sj.ki.5002553.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.