Tissue engineering rib with the incorporation of biodegradable polymer cage and BMSCs/decalcified bone: an experimental study in a canine model
- 3.1k Downloads
The reconstruction of large bone defects, including rib defects, remains a challenge for surgeons. In this study, we used biodegradable polydioxanone (PDO) cages to tissue engineer ribs for the reconstruction of 4cm-long costal defects.
PDO sutures were used to weave 6cm long and 1cm diameter cages. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) which is a xenograft was molded into cuboids and seeded with second passage bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) that had been osteogenically induced. Two DBM cuboids seeded with BMSCs were put into the PDO cage and used to reconstruct the costal defects. Radiographic examination including 3D reconstruction, histologic examination and mechanical test was performed after 24 postoperative weeks.
All the experimental subjects survived. In all groups, the PDO cage had completely degraded after 24 weeks and been replaced by fibrous tissue. Better shape and radian were achieved in PDO cages filled with DBM and BMSCs than in the other two groups (cages alone, or cages filled with acellular DBM cuboids). When the repaired ribs were subjected to an outer force, the ribs in the PDO cage/DBMs/BMSCs group kept their original shape while ribs in the other two groups deformed. In the PDO cage/DBMs/BMSCs groups, we also observed bony union at all the construct interfaces while there was no bony union observed in the other two groups. This result was also confirmed by radiographic and histologic examination.
This study demonstrates that biodegradable PDO cage in combination with two short BMSCs/DBM cuboids can repair large rib defects. The satisfactory repair rate suggests that this might be a feasible approach for large bone repair.
KeywordsTissue engineering Rib reconstruction PDO Long defect of bone
Demineralized bone matrix
Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells
Scanning Electron Microscope.
Rib defects are seen in many medical situations such as post excision of chest wall tumours [1, 2], infection, necrosis , trauma and when part of a rib is used as the donor material to reconstruct other bone defects [4, 5]. In the past, little attention was paid to rib defect reconstruction as it was always thought that to have little impact on respiratory function. With the development of improved surgical techniques and the increase of patient aesthetic concerns, rib reconstruction has gradually gained more attention. As rib defects are always large, to now there are few experimental reports on rib reconstruction.
Tissue engineering has been demonstrated to be a viable technique for regenerating large segments of bone [6, 7]; however, few attempts have been made to tissue engineer ribs where a complete segmental defect exists.
When tissue engineering bone, two important factors must be considered chiefly among many others—seed cell and scaffold. Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) have repeatedly been demonstrated to be a suitable seed cell for bone tissue engineering [8, 9, 10]. As for the scaffold, significant research has been performed to identify the best material for bone tissue engineering. Autogenous bone is often considered to be the best scaffold for bone tissue engineering [8, 11, 12], but concerns over the limited ability and donor site morbidity limit its use in the treatment of large defects, so allograft and xenograft bone often become the first choice in clinical applications.
Polydioxanone (PDO), a synthetic resorbable polymer is now widely used as a suture material due to its strength and rate of degradation, but there are few reports about its use for other applications. Our previous work has included successful reconstruction of a chest wall defect spanning multiple ribs using a single PDO mesh .
For this study, we hypothesized that two 2-cm long DBM cuboids seeded with autogenous BMSCs could be placed with a 6-cm long PDO cage woven from PDO sutures and used to repair a 4-cm long single rib defect in the canine, proving the potential of reconstructing a single rib defect using multiple scaffolds seeded with BMSCs. We hypothesized that the PDO cage alone, or a PDO cage filled with two acellular cuboids would not equal the regenerative capability of the cell-seeded scaffolds.
The grouping of the experimental dogs
Number of the animals
The reconstruction of 4th rib defect
The reconstruction of 7th rib defect
PDO cage/ DBM
Preparation of DBMs/BMSCs
The demineralization process: The swine cancellous bone of the tibial plateau was prepared and washed with 50°C water repeatedly until it was clean. Then it would be dried up and degreased with Chloroform methanol under the 50°C temperature for 24 hours. The scaffold would be soaked in the H2O2 (volume fraction 300 ml/L) for another 24 hours. The degreasing process and soaking process would be repeated twice. Then the scafoolds would be dialyzed with double-distilled water for 12 hours. The last step is to deminerlized with 0.3 mol/L hydrochloric acid for 5 minutes and washed with clean water. The residual calcium was ranged from 12% to 20%. The pore size ranged from 150 um to 400 um.
Preparation of biodegradable polymer cage
Three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the thoracic cage were accomplished using the Advantage Workstation 4.2 24 weeks after surgery to observe the regeneration of rib.
Sample preparation and histological examination
The dogs were euthanized by means of an overdose of sodium pentobarbital at 24 weeks. The fourth and seventh ribs including defects were dissected. All dissected samples were photographed and then decalcified in 15% formic acid in formalin for 2–6 weeks. Tissue sections of samples were obtained for H&E staining. The costal tissue was also stained by H&E. The contralateral ribs were removed as normal controls.
The length of the samples was uniformly processed as 6 cm, including the reconstructed part. Each sample was tested using a three bending point test. The parameters of the test were as follows: L (test span) = 60 mm, load rate = 0.5N/mm, primary load = 1N. The bending stress was calculated using the equation: σ = 3PL/2bh2, where σ, P, L, b, and h represent the bending stress, the bending strength load, test span, the width and thickness of the specimen, respectively.
Mechanical test data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. The differences between the PDO cage/DBMs/BMSCs group (n = 12), PDO cage/DBMs group (n = 6), PDO cage group (n = 6) and normal rib group (n = 12) were assessed by Student–Newman–Keuls-q. The level of statistical significance was defined as p = 0.05.
Additional file 1: The normal rib. (MPEG 3 MB)
Additional file 2: The rib defect was reconstructed with PDO cage/DBM. (MPEG 4 MB)
To evaluate the mechanical properties of the reconstructed rib, three point bending tests were performed at 24 weeks after surgery. As there was no bone-union in the PDO cage group and the PDO cage/DBMs group, the three point bending test was not applied. In PDO cage/DBMs/BMSCs group (n = 12), the bending stress was 44.27 ± 2.31 Mpa, equivalent to 94.8% of the contralateral normal rib (46.67 ± 4.62 Mpa, n = 12). As there were only two groups, the assessment of the data was performed using a paired samples t-test. No significant difference were found between the two groups (P > 0.05).
The 4cm-long rib defect in this study meets the standard criteria of a critical size defect which is defined as a defect with length at least 2.5 times the diameter of the bone . Also, when the defect was not repaired during surgery, after 24 postoperative weeks there was no evidence of bone regeneration in the defect. However, when this defect was reconstructed with the experimental construct, a biodegradable PDO cage and two BMSCs/decalcified bones, there was bone regeneration into the defect.
In this study, we tried to address two problems— fixation of scaffolds and repair of large bone defects. As for the first problem, two aspects including material and form have to be considered. As for the material for fixation, typically nondegradable materials, such as stainless steel or titanium [15, 16], are deemed to be ideal as they have good mechanical properties which can maintain the stability of scaffolds. Such materials are now widely used in orthopedics for the fixation of various fractures. However, several problems still remain such as high cost, infection, difficulty molding the materials and the lack of degradation, which may result in many complications. Often, such materials have to be removed in an additional operation, adding to the patient’s pain and the cost associated with the initial operation. Furthermore, nondegradable materials are almost completely radiopaque, which obscures observation of the tissue around the material. Some imaging modalities, such as MRI, cannot be used when needed, which may delay the diagnosis of other diseases. Thus there is an increasing trend towards using degradable materials. In this study, we used PDO as the material of fixation. PDO has now been widely used for suture as it has excellent mechanical strength and degradability. It is reported that PDO sutures (PDS) can maintain their strength for about twenty weeks and will be completely resorbed after 180 days, which matches well to the speed of tissue regeneration [17, 18]. In our study, we also found that the PDO cage was completely replaced by fibrous tissue which accords well with the result of other researchers’ experiments. As for degradation, hydrolysis into H2O and CO2 is the main method of degradation and should have little effect on the growth of BMSCs .
For the form of fixation, different methods such as chambers, cages and threads were used . Porous cages are ideal for the fixation of scaffolds. First, the cage allows contact between the scaffold and primary rib, which can form an osseous connection in those junctions, adding to the stability of the rib. Second, the porous cage wall also allows for nutrient exchange with the material within the cage. The form of cage was first reported by Cobos et al. . They repaired segmental long bone defects with cylindrical titanium cages. Over the next several years, this model was widely used. It is suitable for the reconstruction of load bearing bone as it has appropriate mechanical properties. The titanium cage, however, is nondegradable and radiopaque, which affects the observation of new bone and the tissue behind it. In this study, we utilized a PDO cage instead of a metal cage as the container for the scaffold. The PDO cage had appropriate degradability and is radiolucent, and thus did not affect the observation of organs in the thoracic cage. The PDO cage, however, had poor mechanical properties and can only be used in non-load bearing bones such as the rib, upper limb, etc. SEM characterization showed that the PDO cage also had a pores whose size is about 250 um × 250 um, sufficient to allow the penetration and exchange of nutrients and waste. Additionally, this cage is flexible and can match the radian of the chest wall.
The second problem is the repair of large bone defects, which was the critical part of our study. In the past several years, significant research directed towards addressing this problem, but little progress has been made. Tissue engineering is now an acknowledged technique for the reconstruction of bone defects, but, to date large bone defect repair remains a challenging problem. In the past, a single scaffold was widely used as a prosthetic for bone reconstruction or regeneration [21, 22, 23]. Some special considerations must be made when designing a scaffold to repair a rib defect. First, the rib has a variable radian and thus a single scaffold may not be suitable for rib reconstruction as the scaffold must be easily molded. In this study, we used multiple pieces of scaffold to reconstruct one bone defect. This method was first reported by Masatoshi et al. . They successfully reconstructed a long rib defect with sixteen small, porous TCP scaffolds connected with titanum wire and covered with periosteum.
There still, however, remain several problems such as the mechanical integrity of the scaffolds. Although rib is a bone that suffers very little outer force, because of the effect of the chest muscle, the scaffold still is exposed to deforming forces, especially when the animal vocalizes. In the present study, we used DBM as the scaffold due to the suitable mechanical properties and porosity, which seemed to make it a more ideal scaffold than tricalcium phosphate. First, DBM has good osteoconductivity, osteoinductivity and osteogenic potential and has been widely used in orthopedic applications. Second, the rib is not a load bearing bone but may move with respiration. Thus we need a firm fixation of the scaffold. Third, the cortex of bone is the main component of the rib and yields very few seed cells for native tissue regeneration. Thus, a tissue engineering approach which can supply seed cells is the most suitable method for rib reconstruction.
Although we have achieved a good result with respect to the fixation of the scaffold and rib reconstruction, some problems should be studied further. First, the PDO cage as the material for fixation can only be used in non load bearing bone. Other materials or a method to augment the mechanical strength of the PDO should be investigated. Second, attempts should be made to optimize the bone regeneration. Nutrients are important to the seed cells, but the scaffolds used do not allow enough nutrients to reach cells seeded at the center of the scaffold. Thus it will be necessary to optimize the scaffold size and configuration with regard to the resultant mechanical properties so that a stable scaffold that allows maximal nutrient transfer is used. Third, xenograft may have rejection reaction if it is not properly managed and thus it may have worse effect of bone regeneration compared to autograft. Fourth, much research is needed into the seed cell source and any necessary manipulations that may be performed prior to implantation such as cell expansion or transformation. A number of options are currently being investigated, and the ideal seed cell for bone tissue engineering has not been identified.
In our study, we successfully reconstructed large rib defects with biodegradable PDO cages in combination with two short DBM/BMSCs constructs. New bone regeneration was verified not only between the two scaffolds but also in the junction of scaffold and primary rib. We think that such a technique might be a feasible approach for large bone repair but further research should be done.
This study was funded by NSFC (30901467) and Shanghai Science and Technology Development Foundation (08ZR1404900).
We thank Dr Yaochang Sun,jianqiu Li, ,Lei Zhong,Lei Xue,Hao Pen,Guangyuan Sun for their techinal assistance to this study.We also appreciate Lili, Wangsu, Weilinyun, Dingxinyu, Zhanglu, Xuliang, Guangpeng Liu,Guangdong Zhou, JunZhou, Chenkai Gao, Jinchun Zhuo for their help .
- 17.Mäkelä P, Pohjonen T, Törmälä P, Waris T, Ashammakhi N: Strength retention properties of self-reinforced poly L-lactide (SR-PLLA) sutures compared with polyglyconate (Maxon) and polydioxanone (PDS) sutures: an in vitro study. Biomaterials. 2002, 23 (12): 2587-2592. 10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00396-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Dallari D, Fini M, Stagni C, Torricelli P, Nicoli Aldini N, Giavaresi G: In vivo study on the healing of bone defects treated with bone marrow stromal cells, platelet-rich plasma, and freeze-dried bone allografts, alone and in combination. J Orthop Res. 2006, 24 (5): 877-888. 10.1002/jor.20112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Hoshino M, Egi T, Terai H, Namikawa T, Takaoka K: Regenerative repair of long intercalated rib defects using porous cylinders of β-Tricalcium phosphate: an experimental study in a canine model. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007, 119 (5): 1431-1439. 10.1097/01.prs.0000256319.89619.c8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.