, 14:O113 | Cite as

Recruitment and retention in internet based randomised trials

  • Gillian W Shorter
  • Finola Ferry
Open Access
Oral presentation


Public Health Alcohol Data Collection Systematic Review Randomise Control Trial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


The use of the internet to recruit participants, deliver interventions or collect data in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is increasing and offers many potential advantages. However, there are limitations in identifying and recruiting participants, and higher loss to follow up than conventional trials.


A systematic review of internet based RCTs was conducted including those conducted either fully or primarily on the internet in the area of alcohol brief interventions. The review (on-going) aimed to identify the challenges, compare the rates and methods of recruitment and retention, and note any methods particularly successful in meeting the challenges of recruitment and retention in online RCTs.


Commonly recruitment was through non-personal communication such as search engines, media or websites, but there was a role for personal interaction such as in person or email recruitment. Particular advantages were reaching non-clinical or hard-to-reach populations. However, online recruitment can be unrepresentative, with multiple or unverified identities common, and those recruited may not fully participate in the intervention. Regarding retention, few studies had a high follow up rate, with rates as low as 10% in some studies. This was often explained by time constraints, changes in circumstances or problems with the study itself. Few solutions were offered, but offline consent and data collection was proposed to improve retention rates.


Internet based RCTs are advantageous in reducing costs and improving equity of access to research. Strategies to improve include better support and connection with participants, and increased consultation with participants about their views.

Copyright information

© Shorter and Ferry; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gillian W Shorter
    • 1
    • 2
  • Finola Ferry
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.MRC All Ireland Hub for Trials Methodology ResearchUniversity of UlsterLondonderryUK
  2. 2.Bamford Centre for Mental Health and WellbeingUniversity of UlsterLondonderryUK

Personalised recommendations