Molecular mechanisms in uterine epithelium during trophoblast binding: the role of small GTPase RhoA in human uterine Ishikawa cells
Embryo implantation requires that uterine epithelium develops competence to bind trophoblast to its apical (free) poles. This essential element of uterine receptivity seems to depend on a destabilisation of the apico-basal polarity of endometrial epithelium. Accordingly, a reorganisation of the actin cytoskeleton regulated by the small GTPase RhoA plays an important role in human uterine epithelial RL95-2 cells for binding of human trophoblastoid JAR cells. We now obtained new insight into trophoblast binding using human uterine epithelial Ishikawa cells.
Polarity of Ishikawa cells was investigated by electron microscopy, apical adhesiveness was tested by adhesion assay. Analyses of subcellular distribution of filamentous actin (F-actin) and RhoA in apical and basal cell poles were performed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) with and without binding of JAR spheroids as well as with and without inhibition of small Rho GTPases by Clostridium difficile toxin A (toxin A). In the latter case, subcellular distribution of RhoA was additionally investigated by Western blotting.
Ishikawa cells express apical adhesiveness for JAR spheroids and moderate apico-basal polarity. Without contact to JAR spheroids, significantly higher signalling intensities of F-actin and RhoA were found at the basal as compared to the apical poles in Ishikawa cells. RhoA was equally distributed between the membrane fraction and the cytosol fraction. Levels of F-actin and RhoA signals became equalised in the apical and basal regions upon contact to JAR spheroids. After inhibition of Rho GTPases, Ishikawa cells remained adhesive for JAR spheroids, the gradient of fluorescence signals of F-actin and RhoA was maintained while the amount of RhoA was reduced in the cytosolic fraction with a comparable increase in the membrane fraction.
Ishikawa cells respond to JAR contact as well as to treatment with toxin A with rearrangement of F-actin and small GTPase RhoA but seem to be able to modify signalling pathways in a way not elucidated so far in endometrial cells. This ability may be linked to the degree of polar organisation observed in Ishikawa cells indicating an essential role of cell phenotype modification in apical adhesiveness of uterine epithelium for trophoblast in vivo.
We thank K.-D. Schulz (Marburg, Germany) for providing the Ishikawa cell line, as well as H. G. Adelmann (Loughborough, UK) for constructive criticisms in advanced digital image processing and for kind provision of his Gauss bandpass and homomorphic filter plugins, and J. Huesing (Essen, Germany) for help with statistical analysis. The skilful technical assistance of K. Baden, B. Gobs, B. Maranca and D. Schuenke is gratefully acknowledged.
- 7.Kim JJ, Fazleabas AT: Uterine receptivity and implantation: the regulation and action of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1), HOXA10 and forkhead transcription factor-1 (FOXO-1) in the baboon endometrium. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2004, 2: 34-10.1186/1477-7827-2-34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 9.Thie M, Denker HW: Endometrial receptivity for trophoblast attachment: Model studies using cell lines. Microscopy of Reproduction and Development. A Dynamic Approach. Edited by: Motta PM. 1997, Rome: Antonio Delfino Editore S.r.l., 241-249.Google Scholar
- 17.Denker HW: Epithel-Epithel-Interaktionen bei der Embryo-Implantation: Ansaetze zur Loesung eines zellbiologischen Paradoxons. Anat Anz. 1986, 160 (Suppl Verh Anat Ges 80): 93-114.Google Scholar
- 18.Denker HW: Trophoblast – endometrial interactions at embryo implantation: A cell biological paradox. Trophoblast Invasion and Endometrial Receptivity. Novel Aspects of the Cell Biology of Embryo Implantation. Trophoblast Research. Edited by: Denker HW, Aplin JD. 1990, New York: Plenum Medical Book, 4: 3-29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Emons G, Schroder B, Ortmann O, Westphalen S, Schulz KD, Schally AV: High affinity binding and direct antiproliferative effects of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs in human endometrial cancer cell lines. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993, 77: 1458-1464. 10.1210/jc.77.6.1458.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 33.Pattillo RA, Ruckert A, Hussa R, Bernstein R, Delfs E: The JAR cell line – continuous human multihormone production and controls [abstract]. In Vitro. 1971, 6: 398-399.Google Scholar
- 34.Chaves-Olarte E, Low P, Freer E, Norlin T, Weidmann M, von Eichel-Streiber C, Thelestam M: A novel cytotoxin from Clostridium difficile serogroup F is a functional hybrid between two other large clostridial cytotoxins. J Biol Chem. 1999, 274: 11046-11052. 10.1074/jbc.274.16.11046.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 35.Adelmann HG: A frequency-domain Gaussian filter module for quantitative and reproducible high-pass, low-pass and band-pass filtering of images. Am Lab. 1997, 29: 27-33.Google Scholar
- 47.Hay ED: Epithelial-mesenchymal transitions. Semin Dev Biol. 1990, 1: 347-356.Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.