Nanoscale Research Letters

, 7:11 | Cite as

Ga-doped ZnO transparent electrodes with TiO2 blocking layer/nanoparticles for dye-sensitized solar cells

  • Ji-Hong Kim
  • Kyung-Ju Lee
  • Ji-Hyung Roh
  • Sang-Woo Song
  • Jae-Ho Park
  • In-Hyung Yer
  • Byung-Moo Moon
Open Access
Nano Express
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. IFFM&AFM2011


Ga-doped ZnO [GZO] thin films were employed for the transparent electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells [DSSCs]. The electrical property of the deposited GZO films was as good as that of commercially used fluorine-doped tin oxide [FTO]. In order to protect the GZO and enhance the photovoltaic properties, a TiO2 blocking layer was deposited on the GZO surface. Then, TiO2 nanoparticles were coated on the blocking layer, and dye was attached for the fabrication of DSSCs. The fabricated DSSCs with the GZO/TiO2 glasses showed an enhanced conversion efficiency of 4.02% compared to the devices with the normal GZO glasses (3.36%). Furthermore, they showed better characteristics even than those using the FTO glasses, which can be attributed to the reduced charge recombination and series resistance.


TiO2 TiO2 Nanoparticles Transparent Electrode DSSC Application Reduce Charge Recombination 


Dye-sensitized solar cells [DSSCs] have been recognized as an alternative to the conventional p-n junction solar cells because of their simple fabrication process, low production cost, and transparency. A typical DSSC consists of a transparent conductive oxide [TCO] electrode, a dye-sensitized oxide semiconductor nanoparticle layer, a liquid redox electrolyte, and a Pt counter electrode [1, 2]. Generally, fluorine-doped tin oxide [FTO] is commonly used for DSSCs as TCO due to its good thermal stability. However, FTO films have some drawbacks including high cost, insufficient conductivity, and low optical transmittance. Therefore, new TCO materials are required to replace FTO glasses [3].

ZnO-based materials have emerged as a promising material for transparent electrodes in solar cell applications. Since undoped ZnO shows high resistivity owing to low carrier concentration, group-III elements are doped into ZnO. Among them, Ga-doped ZnO [GZO] has several advantages such as higher resistance to oxidation and less lattice deformation compared to the other materials [4, 5]. Nevertheless, little effort has been spent on attempts to use GZO as TCO for DSSCs since the surface structure of the ZnO-based materials may be destroyed when they are immersed in the acidic dye solution containing a Ru complex for a long time. Besides, the electrical conductivity of GZO films can deteriorate after thermal annealing at high temperature which is required to form the TiO2 semiconductor nanoparticle layer [6].

In this paper, we suggest the use of GZO transparent electrodes with a TiO2 blocking layer for DSSCs. The TiO2 blocking layer can protect the GZO electrodes from the acidic dye solution and the oxidation at high temperature. The use of a thin TiO2 blocking layer can also reduce the recombination of electrons at the electrode/electrolyte interface.

Experimental details

GZO thin films were deposited on glass substrates by using a pulsed laser deposition [PLD] system for transparent electrodes. A ZnO ceramic target containing 2 wt.% Ga2O3 was ablated using a Q-switched Nd:YAG laser with a wavelength of 355 nm (Surelite III; Continuum, Santa Clara, CA, USA). During the deposition, oxygen partial pressure and substrate temperature were kept at the optimal conditions, which were 20 mTorr and 400°C, respectively. The electrical properties of the deposited GZO thin films were investigated by the van der Pauw Hall measurement system. After the deposition of the GZO films, a thin TiO2 layer was also deposited on the GZO surface for the blocking layer by a PLD method. A metal Ti target was ablated in oxygen atmosphere at a substrate temperature of 400°C. The structural and optical properties were examined by X-ray diffraction [XRD] and UV-Vis spectroscopy.

Using the fabricated GZO glasses, DSSCs were manufactured. Anatase TiO2 slurry (colloid) was prepared with a conventional method [7] and coated for a TiO2 nanoparticle layer. The coating was carried out on the TiO2 blocking layer with an active area of 0.36 cm2 by doctor blading. For comparison, the GZO without the blocking layer and commercially used FTO glasses were also employed to fabricate the DSSCs. After being sintered at 510°C, they were immersed into the solution of N719 ruthenium-based dye. Pt-coated counter electrodes were prepared by screen printing on the GZO-deposited glasses and heated at 400°C. The surface morphologies of the TiO2 nanoparticles on the GZO and GZO/TiO2 glasses were observed by scanning electron microscopy [SEM]. Then, the DSSC cells were assembled by sealing the TiO2 electrode and Pt electrode together using a hot melt film (Bynel; DuPont, Wilmington, DE, USA), and an electrolyte was injected into the space between the electrodes through a predrilled hole in the counter electrode. Finally, the hole was sealed with Bynel and a cover glass. The photovoltaic performance of the DSSCs was evaluated using a solar simulator at one sun (AM1.5, 100 mWcm-2) condition. In order to investigate the electron transport properties of the DSSCs, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy analysis was performed.

Results and discussion

Figure 1 shows the XRD θ-2θ spectra of the GZO thin films on glass substrates. The diffraction peak of GZO (0002) appears at 2θ = 33.64°, which means that the c-axis oriented GZO films were grown on glass substrates. GZO thin films are well known to have a hexagonal wurtzite structure with a preferred growth orientation along the c-axis due to their lowest surface free energy. The GZO films on glass showed a very low resistivity of 5.95 × 10-4 Ω cm (sheet resistance of 6.53 Ω/sq), which is comparable to that of the commercially used FTO glasses. The carrier concentration and Hall mobility of the GZO films were 6.82 × 1020/cm3 and 15.37 cm2/Vs, respectively. The high carrier concentration of the GZO films can be attributed to the substitution of Ga3+ for Zn2+ caused by the supply of sufficient thermal energy [8]. Furthermore, the deposition at the optimal substrate temperature leads to high mobility with the improvement in crystallinity. From these results, it is concluded that the deposited GZO films can be used for transparent electrodes. However, as mentioned above, a blocking layer should be needed in DSSC applications because of susceptibility to acid and oxidation at high temperature.
Figure 1

XRD θ -2 θ pattern of the GZO thin films deposited on glass substrates.

Figure 2 shows the optical transmittance spectra for the GZO glasses with the TiO2 blocking layer. The average transmittance is approximately 80% in the visible region, which implies that the fabricated GZO glasses are highly transparent enough to be applied to the DSSCs even after the deposition of the TiO2 blocking layer.
Figure 2

Optical transmittance spectra for the GZO glasses with the TiO 2 blocking layer.

Figures 3a and 3b show the SEM images of the TiO2 nanoparticles coated on the GZO glasses with the TiO2 blocking layer and normal GZO glasses, respectively. It can be seen that the porous TiO2 nanoparticles adhere uniformly on both glasses. There is no large difference between them, but the morphology of the TiO2 nanoparticles on the TiO2 blocking layer is more ordered and spherical.
Figure 3

SEM images of the TiO 2 nanoparticles. The TiO2 nanoparticles were coated on the (a) GZO glasses with the TiO2 blocking layer and (b) normal GZO glasses.

Figure 4 shows the photocurrent density-voltage [J-V] characteristics of the fabricated DSSCs using the GZO/TiO2, GZO, and FTO glasses measured under one sun condition. The estimated photovoltaic parameters are summarized in Table 1. It should be noted that the performance of the DSSCs with the normal GZO glasses is relatively poor (3.36%) compared to that with the FTO though the GZO and FTO have similar electrical resistivity. However, when the TiO2 blocking layer is employed, the fabricated DSSCs show an improvement in the short-circuit current [Isc] and fill factor [FF], and as a result, a conversion efficiency of 4.02% is obtained, which is 19.6% higher than that of the DSSCs with the normal GZO glasses. These results prove that the TiO2 blocking layer plays a role in protecting the GZO films as was expected. Furthermore, the DSSCs with the GZO/TiO2 glasses show slightly better characteristics than those with the commercially used FTO glasses, which is ascribed to the fact that the TiO2 blocking layer can prohibit the recombination of injected electrons in the GZO with the electrolyte effectively. In particular, the improvement in FF is clearly found, which is due to the improved electrical contact between the GZO and TiO2 nanoparticles [9].
Figure 4

J-V characteristics of the fabricated DSSCs using the GZO/TiO 2 , GZO, and FTO glasses.

Table 1

Photovoltaic parameters of the fabricated DSSCs


Voc (V)

Jsc (mA/cm2)


















Figure 5 presents the Nyquist plots of the electrochemical impedance spectra of the fabricated DSSCs with and without the TiO2 blocking layer. It is known that the semicircles in the frequency regions of 103 to 105, 1 to 103, and 0.1 to 1 Hz are associated with the charge transport at the TiO2/TCO or Pt/electrolyte interface, TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface, and Nernstian diffusion in the electrolyte, respectively [10]. The first circle of the DSSCs with the GZO/TiO2 glasses is smaller than that with the GZO glasses, which indicates that the charge transport at the TiO2 nanoparticles/GZO is easier with the TiO2 blocking layer. The larger shunt resistance of the DSSCs with the GZO/TiO2 glasses corresponding to the second circle is also seen. Therefore, the improvement in the efficiency with the TiO2 blocking layer can be explained by the small series resistance and large shunt resistance [11].
Figure 5

Electrochemical impedance spectra of the fabricated DSSCs with and without the TiO 2 blocking layer.


GZO thin films were deposited on glass substrates for DSSC applications. The GZO films showed a low resistivity of 5.95 × 10-4 Ω cm. A TiO2 blocking layer was inserted between the GZO and TiO2 nanoparticles to protect the GZO and enhance the photovoltaic properties. The fabricated DSSCs with the GZO/TiO2 glasses showed a conversion efficiency of 4.02%, which was 19.6% higher compared to 3.36% of the DSSCs using the GZO glasses. Furthermore, they showed slightly better characteristics than those using the commercially used FTO glasses. These results can be ascribed to the reduced charge recombination and series resistance caused by the influence of the TiO2 blocking layer. Therefore, it can be concluded that the GZO films have the ability to be employed to the high-efficiency DSSCs as transparent electrodes.



This work was supported by Korea University Grant and the New & Renewable Energy of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Knowledge Economy (No. 20103030010040-11-1000).

Supplementary material

11671_2011_653_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg (113 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 1
11671_2011_653_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg (147 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 2
11671_2011_653_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg (1.2 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 3
11671_2011_653_MOESM4_ESM.jpeg (240 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 4
11671_2011_653_MOESM5_ESM.jpeg (180 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 5


  1. 1.
    Roh S-J, Mane RS, Min S-K, Lee W-J, Lokhande CD, Han S-H: Achievement of 4.51% conversion efficiency using ZnO recombination barrier layer in TiO2 based dye-sensitized solar cells. Appl Phys Lett 2006, 89: 253512–253512–3. 10.1063/1.2410240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang W, Wan F, Chen S, Jiang C: Hydrothermal growth and application of ZnO nanowire films with ZnO and TiO2buffer layers in dye-sensitized solar cells. Nanoscale Res Lett 2009, 4: 1486–1492. 10.1007/s11671-009-9425-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wang X, Zhi LJ, Müllen K: Transparent, conductive graphene electrodes for dye-sensitized solar cells. Nano Lett 2008, 8: 323–327. 10.1021/nl072838rCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shin HH, Joung YH, Kang SJ: Influence of the substrate temperature on the optical and electrical properties of Ga-doped ZnO thin films fabricated by pulsed laser deposition. Mater Sci 2009, 20: 704–708.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bie X, Lu JG, Gong L, Lin L, Zhao BH, Ye ZZ: Transparent conductive ZnO: Ga films prepared by DC reactive magnetron sputtering at low temperature. Appl Surf Sci 2009, 256: 289–293. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.08.018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zhang QF, Dandeneau CS, Zhou XY, Cao GZ: ZnO nanostructures for dye-sensitized solar cells. Adv Mater 2009, 21: 4087–4108. 10.1002/adma.200803827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wu S, Han H, Tai Q, Zhang J, Chen BL, Xu S, Zhou C, Yang Y, Hu H, Zhao X-Z: Improvement in dye-sensitized solar cells with a ZnO-coated TiO2 electrode by rf magnetron sputtering. Appl Phys Lett 2008, 92: 122106–3. 10.1063/1.2903105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Park S-M, Ikegami T, Ebihara K: Effects of substrate temperature on the properties of Ga-doped ZnO by pulsed laser deposition. Thin Solid Films 2006, 513: 90–94. 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.01.051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Xia J, Masaki N, Jiang K, Yanagida S: Deposition of a thin film of TiOxfrom a titanium metal target as novel blocking layers at conducting glass/TiO2interfaces in ionic liquid mesoscopic TiO2dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem B 2006, 110: 25222–25228. 10.1021/jp064327jCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lee S, Noh JH, Han HS, Yim DK, Kim DH, Lee J-K, Kim JY, Jung HS, Hong KS: Nb-doped TiO2: a new compact layer material for TiO2 dye-sensitized solar cells. J Phys Chem C 2009, 113: 6878–6882. 10.1021/jp9002017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xia JB, Masaki N, Jiang KJ, Yanagida S: Fabrication and characterization of thin Nb2O5 blocking layers for ionic liquid-based dye-sensitized solar cells. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem 2007, 188: 120–127. 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2006.11.028CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kim et al; licensee Springer. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ji-Hong Kim
    • 1
  • Kyung-Ju Lee
    • 1
  • Ji-Hyung Roh
    • 1
  • Sang-Woo Song
    • 1
  • Jae-Ho Park
    • 1
  • In-Hyung Yer
    • 1
  • Byung-Moo Moon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical EngineeringKorea UniversitySeoulSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations