Advertisement

Papillary muscles in borderline left ventricules: morphological differences compared to normal

  • María N Velasco Forte
  • Martin Grips
  • Mohamed S Nassar
  • Gerald F Greil
  • Tarique Hussain
Open Access
Poster presentation
  • 356 Downloads

Keywords

Left Ventricle Morphological Difference Papillary Muscle Clinical Reason Insertion Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Background

In healthy subjects the papillary muscles (PM's) are usually organized as two equal-sized muscles holding an anterolateral and posteromedial position in the left ventricle (LV). However, as described in observational autopsy studies, their morphology may vary. There may be two clear PM's or one or both muscles may be split into several groups. In this study, morphological differences in the PM's in borderline and normal-sized LV's were assessed using CMR.

Methods

Children undergoing CMR for clinical reasons were included in the study. This comprised of thirty-three consecutive borderline LV cases and twenty-nine consecutive subjects with a normal-sized LV. The morphology of the PM's, their location and the angle created between them was assessed using a steady-state-free-precession short-axis (SAx) cine and 3D-whole-heart sequences. IRB approval was obtained for retrospective analysis.

Results

The median age was 4.3 years (range: 4months to 20 years; 35 male patients).The combination of SAx cine imaging and 3D-whole-heart imaging demonstrated PM anatomy in all cases.

All patients with normal-sized LV had two major muscle groups whereas 33% of children with borderline LV only had a single PM (Pearson X2:p=0.001). When a single PM was observed, it held a posteromedial position in 82% of the cases. However, there was no significant difference between the location of the PM support between both groups.

Splitting of PM into groups was found regularly in both LV types. In borderline LV, groups were often split widely at their insertion to the LV giving a broad-based pedicle (33% of cases, Figure 1). However, a narrow or fused pedicle was always observed in normal size LV.

The mean angle between PM insertion points was similar between groups (1120 (SD 150) in normal LV and 1260 (SD 310) for borderline ones when two narrow pedicles (n=14) were observed).

Eight children underwent successful biventricular repair in this series of borderline LV. Seven of these had two narrow/fused pedicles (X2:p=0.006 versus group undergoing univentricular repair).

Conclusions

In normal-sized LV, the PM's are dual with narrow/fused pedicles. In the hypoplastic/borderline LV, there is often only a single PM and the pedicle of the PM's is often split with a broad base. Having two PM's with narrow/fused origins appears to be an additional indicator of favourable anatomy for biventricular repair. A combination of 3D whole-heart and short-axis cine is required to assess papillary morphology accurately.

Copyright information

© Velasco Forte et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • María N Velasco Forte
    • 1
    • 2
  • Martin Grips
    • 1
  • Mohamed S Nassar
    • 1
  • Gerald F Greil
    • 1
    • 3
  • Tarique Hussain
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Division of Imaging Sciencies and Biomedical EngineeringGuy's and Saint Thomas HospitalSan José de La RinconadaSpain
  2. 2.Paediatric Cardiology UnitVirgen del Rocio HospitalSevilleSpain
  3. 3.King's College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations