Advertisement

Comparison of electroanatomic voltage mapping with late gadolinium enhancement CMR

  • Dana C Peters
  • Warren J Manning
  • Mark E Josephson
  • James S Duncan
  • Sudhakar Chelikani
Open Access
Poster presentation
  • 381 Downloads

Keywords

Late Gadolinium Enhancement Pulmonary Vein Isolation Late Gadolinium Enhancement Image Voltage Mapping Pulmonary Vein Ostium 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with atrial remodeling, including atrial cellular pathology [1, 2], left atrial enlargement [3], and low voltage on electroanatomic mapping (EAM)[4]. Recent studies have identified late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in AF subjects pre-PVI as novel evidence of LA remodeling [5]. One study compared voltage by EAM obtained prior to a pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) procedure with the extent of atrial fibrosis using LGE [6]. Our goal was to further correlate EAM voltages with LGE.

Methods

Sixteen AF patients were imaged on a 1.5T scanner (Achieva, Philips Healthcare, NL) using high resolution LGE [7], prior to their first PVI. Left atrial LGE was obtained using an ECG-triggered, navigator-gated 3D GRE inversion recovery (IR) sequence obtained 10-20 minutes after the administration of 0.2 mmol/kg of Gd-DTPA, with spatial resolution of 1.3 × 1.3 × 4 mm 3. The left atrial cavity and enhanced tissue were segmented on the LGE images, using a threshold corresponding to the signal of enhanced mitral valves. EAM was performed by CARTO (Biosense, Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA). The LGE enhancement and EAM data were registered using pulmonary vein ostia as landmarks, and fused. The mean bipolar voltage in regions with LA LGE enhancement vs. no LGE enhancement was calculated. Regions with no voltage mapping data (within 5 mm radius) were excluded. The areas of the LA cavity with low voltage (<0.38 mV) or with LGE were measured.

Results

Among all subjects, the mean bipolar voltage recorded in regions with LGE enhancement was 0.29 ± 0.17 mV vs. 0.51 ± 0.25 mV in regions without (p < 0.001). Figure 1A shows a representative map of LGE enhancement located in a region of low voltage. Figure 1B plots extent of low voltage vs. extent of LGE. Patients with more or less extensive LGE (using a cutoff of 6% by area) had similar BMI, LA volumes, hypertension, but older age correlated with greater LGE (Table 1).
Figure 1

A) Reconstructed bipolar voltage map merged with LGE enhancement (purple mesh). See voltage scale bar. B) Linear relationship between low voltage extent and LGE enhancement extent (p = 0.20).

Table 1

 

All (N = 16)

More extensive LGE by area (%)

Less extensive LGE by area (%)

Age (years)*

58 ± 11

63 ± 7

51 ± 12

Male (%)

83%

62%

100%

Low voltage area (%)

33 ± 9%

35 ± 9%

29 ± 9%

BMI (kg/m^2)

26 ± 4

26 ± 4

28 ± 3

LA volume index

64 ± 20

62 ± 17

69 ± 23

Recurrence

63%

25%

50%

HTN

37%

37%

37%

*p = 0.03.

Conclusions

Comparison of EAM and LGE enhancement/scar shows a relationship by which the voltage measured in enhanced regions of the atrial wall have lower average voltage, and a potential correspondence between LGE and EAM.

Funding

Funding: NIH (NHLBI R21 HL 098573 & R21 HL103463).

References

  1. 1.
    Thiedemann KU, Ferrans VJ: Am J Pathol. 1977, 89: 575-604.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Oliveira IM: Cardiovasc Pathol. 2012Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaziri SM: Hypertension. 1995, 25 (6): 1155-60. 10.1161/01.HYP.25.6.1155.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Verma A: JACC. 2005, 45: 285-292. 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.10.035.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oakes RS: Circ. 2009, 119: 1758-1767. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.811877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Malcome-Lawes LC: Heart Rhythm. 2013, 10: 1184-91. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.04.030.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peters DC: Radiology. 2007, 243: 690-695. 10.1148/radiol.2433060417.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Peters et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dana C Peters
    • 1
  • Warren J Manning
    • 2
    • 3
  • Mark E Josephson
    • 2
  • James S Duncan
    • 1
    • 4
  • Sudhakar Chelikani
    • 1
  1. 1.Diagnostic RadiologyYale School of MedicineNew HavenUSA
  2. 2.Cardiovascular MedicineBeth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  3. 3.Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterBostonUSA
  4. 4.Biomedical EngineeringYale UniversityNew HavenUSA

Personalised recommendations