Advertisement

CMR techniques and findings in children with myocarditis: a multicenter retrospective study

  • Puja Banka
  • Santosh Uppu
  • Matthew A Harris
  • Keren Hasbani
  • Wyman W Lai
  • Marc Richmond
  • Sohrab Fratz
  • Supriya Jain
  • Tiffanie Johnson
  • Shiraz A Maskatia
  • Jimmy C Lu
  • Margaret M Samyn
  • David J Patton
  • Andrew J Powell
Open Access
Poster presentation

Keywords

Ejection Fraction Congenital Heart Disease Myocarditis Late Gadolinium Enhancement Regional Wall Motion Abnormality 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Background

CMR is increasingly used to diagnose myocarditis in adults but its use in pediatric-age pts is not well established. We sought to describe the clinical presentation, CMR imaging protocols, CMR findings, and outcomes in a multicenter cohort of children with myocarditis.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted among 12 institutions from 3 countries. All pts meeting the following criteria were included: 1) age < 21 years, 2) ultimate clinical diagnosis of myocarditis by the referring physicians, 3) CMR examination within 30 days of presentation, and 4) no congenital heart disease. Clinical data and test results, including CMR findings, were abstracted from the medical record.

Results

A total of 112 pts (median age 16 yrs (0-20)) met inclusion criteria. On echo at presentation, 22 pts (20%) had moderate or severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, and 20 (24%) had regional wall motion abnormalities. Endomyocardial biopsy was performed in 24 pts (21%), of which 12 were positive based on histology and 5 borderline. Percent of pts undergoing biopsy was similar across institutions (p = 0.32). Median time from presentation to CMR was 2 days (0-30), and 107 (96%) were inpatients. Sedation was used in 15 CMR studies (14%), and inotropic support in 16 (14%). Median LV ejection fraction (EF) was 56% (10-74) with 22% having EF < 45%. Median right ventricular EF was 55% (16-72) with 9% having EF < 40%. T2-weighted imaging (T2W) was performed in 71 studies (66%) and was abnormal in 49 (69%). First pass contrast perfusion (FPP) imaging was performed in 42 studies (45%) and was abnormal in 4 (10%). T1-weighted imaging for early gadolinium enhancement (EGE) was performed in 35 studies (37%) and was abnormal in 19 (51%). Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging was performed in all studies, and was abnormal in 93 (83%) with the following reported distributions: 89% subepicardial or midwall, 6% patchy, 3% sub-endocardial, 1% transmural, and 1% diffuse. The CMR study was interpreted as positive for myocarditis in 96 pts (87%), negative in 11 (10%), and equivocal in 4 (4%), yielding a sensitivity of 86% for an ultimate clinical diagnosis of myocarditis. There was significant practice variation in the use of T2W, FPP, and EGE imaging among the participating institutions (Figure 1). At a median follow-up time from CMR of 6 mo (0.2-217), all patients were alive and 3 had undergone cardiac transplantation, all of whom had CMR studies positive for myocarditis.
Figure 1

Percent of CMR studies at each participating center (A-L) in which T2W (A), FPP (B), and EGE imaging (C) was performed. Number of pts enrolled from each institution is given at the bottom of panel (C).

Conclusions

This is the largest study to date describing the CMR findings in children with myocarditis. The CMR techniques used, from most to least common, were LGE, T2W, FPP, and EGE. Abnormalities were most often seen with LGE followed by T2W, EGE, and FPP. There was significant practice variation in the CMR protocol between institutions. The information from this study should be useful in planning a prospective study to evaluate the diagnostic and predictive performance of CMR in children with suspected myocarditis.

Funding

None.

Copyright information

© Banka et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Puja Banka
    • 1
  • Santosh Uppu
    • 2
  • Matthew A Harris
    • 3
  • Keren Hasbani
    • 4
  • Wyman W Lai
    • 5
  • Marc Richmond
    • 5
  • Sohrab Fratz
    • 6
  • Supriya Jain
    • 7
  • Tiffanie Johnson
    • 8
  • Shiraz A Maskatia
    • 9
  • Jimmy C Lu
    • 10
  • Margaret M Samyn
    • 11
  • David J Patton
    • 12
  • Andrew J Powell
    • 1
  1. 1.Boston Children's HospitalBostonUSA
  2. 2.Mount Sinai HospitalNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Children's Hospital of PhiladelphiaPhiladelphiaUSA
  4. 4.Advocate Children's HospitalPark RidgeUSA
  5. 5.Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital of New York-PresbyterianNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Deutsches Herzzentrum MünchenMunichGermany
  7. 7.Maria Fareri Children's Hospital at Westchester Medical CenterValhallaUSA
  8. 8.Riley Hospital For ChildrenIndianopolisUSA
  9. 9.Texas Children's HospitalHoustonUSA
  10. 10.C.S. Mott Children's HospitalAnn ArborUSA
  11. 11.Medical College of WisconsinMilwaukeeUSA
  12. 12.Alberta Children's HospitalCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations