Background

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death for both men and women. Therefore, the search for new anti-tumor agents has been increasing in recent years. As cell cycle deregulation and tumor growth are intimately linked[1, 2], the discovery of new substances targeting events in this biochemical pathway would be of great value. In this light, the search for natural compounds of plant origin combined to pharmacological investigations could reveal new substances with potential anti-cancer properties.

Eukaryotic cell cycle progression is tightly regulated by the sequential activation and inactivation of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), being positively and negatively regulated by cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors, respectively[2, 3]. Cyclins D and E are fundamental G1-phase cyclins, while cyclins A and B allow cells to traverse the S and G2M phases of the cell cycle, respectively. Inappropriate expression, regulation and/or mutations of CDKs, cyclins and their regulatory proteins have been described in various cancer types[1].

An important aspect of the cell cycle is that it is controlled by intricate intracellular signaling mechanisms. One of them is the MAPK pathway, which is formed by a cascade of kinases, generally referred to as Raf/MEK/ERK. In this pathway, activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERKs) translocate into the nucleus and regulate the activity of transcription factors such as c-myc and others[4, 5], resulting in the expression of genes required for cell cycle progression like cyclins D1 and E and p27[6, 7]. In addition, the expression of these cyclins and of other cell cycle related genes is also stimulated by the NF-κB transcription factor[8, 9] which also influences the epigenetic regulation of gene transcription by increasing, for example, the expression of O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase, an important DNA damage repair enzyme[10].

The anti-tumor effects of terpene derivatives have been demonstrated in medicinal plants[11]. Pterodon pubescens (Pp) Benth. (Leguminosae), popularly known as “Sucupira branca”, is a native tree widely distributed over the central region of Brazil, whose seeds are used in folk medicine to treat rheumatic and inflammatory diseases[12]. These properties have been scientifically confirmed and, recently, additional anti-tumor effects have also been demonstrated for Pterodon pubescens seeds[1315]. Phytochemical studies with the hexanic fraction of the ethanolic extract of Pterodon pubescens seeds (EEPp) have shown the presence of linear terpenes such as farnesol and geranylgeraniol, and of diterpenes with a vouacapan skeleton[1619]. The SF5 hexanic subfraction of EEPp is rich in farnesol and vouacapan and geranylgeraniol diterpene derivatives and recent work reported that SF5 shows anti-tumor properties by inducing apoptosis in leukemia cells[19]. As it is still unclear whether SF5 affects the cell cycle, this work was undertaken to investigate the effects of this terpenic subfraction on the proliferation of leukemia cells and its mechanism of action.

Methods

Materials and reagents

RPMI 1640 medium, streptomycin sulfate, propidium iodide, triton X-100, RNAse, sodium dodecyl sulfate, PPO, POPOP, Phytohemagglutinin A (PHA), protease inhibitors and serum bovine albumin were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co., USA. Penicillin was purchased from Fontoura-Wyerth, Brazil. Fetal calf serum (FCS) was purchased from Cultilab, Brazil. 3H-metil-thymidine was purchased from Amersham Life Science, USA. For PCR, dNTP mix, Trizol, first-strand buffer, ribonuclease inhibitor, DTT, SuperScriptTM II RNAse H Reverse Transcriptase, random primers, MgCl2 and Taq polymerase platinum were purchased from Invitrogen, USA. Primers for cyclins D1 and E2, c-myc, p21 and beta actin were purchased from Imprint, Brazil. Anti-human antibodies: p65, Histone, ERK 1/2 and p-ERK 1/2 were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA. ECL kit and film for western blotting were purchased from Amersham Biosciences, USA.

Plant material collection and extraction

Pterodon pubescens seeds were collected by Luciana Pontes Coelho in Goiás, Brazil and flowering branches of this tree were used for taxonomic identification by Haroldo Cavalcante de Lima at the Departamento de Botânica Sistemática, Jardim Botânico do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil, where a voucher of the collected specimen has been deposited (RB 350279). Pterodon pubescens seeds were powdered in liquid nitrogen and submitted to 100% ethanol extraction (15 g/100 mL) at room temperature for 15 days as described by Silva and collaborators[12]. The ethanolic extract of Pterodon pubescens seeds (EEPp) was obtained (50% yield, w/w) after ethanol evaporation. Afterwards, the EEPp was fractionated by liquid-liquid partition chromatography using hexane. The obtained hexanic fraction (HEX, 55% yield) was submitted to a column chromatography (42 × 2.5 cm) on silica gel (Art. 7733 – Kieselgel 60, 35–70 mesh, 0.2-0.5 mm, Merck) and eluted successively with hexane (500 mL), hexane/dichloromethane (1:1) (500 mL), hexane/ethyl acetate (1:1) (500 mL), ethyl acetate (500 mL), ethanol (500 mL) and 2% acetic acid in ethanol (500 mL), as previously described by Pereira and collaborators[19]. After gas chromatography analysis of eluted samples, they were joined in eight subfractions according to their chromatographic profile similarity. The HEX GC profile shows two regions of important peaks, the first one in the retention time range of 2.0 and 5.0 seconds and the second one between 6.0 and 10.0 seconds. The GC analysis of the most cytotoxic subfraction to leukemia cells, subfraction 5 (SF5, 32.9% of HEX fraction), indicates that it corresponds to the second region of the HEX fraction, containing the furane diterpenes methyl-6α-acetoxy-7β-hydroxy-vouacapan-17β-oate and 6α,7β-diacetoxy-vouacapan- besides epoxyfarnesol and geranylgeraniol derivatives[20] HEX and SF5 were previously diluted at different concentrations with RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FCS.

Cell proliferation assays

The human chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562 (CCL-243) was purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and cultured in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. The effects of the plant derived samples on cell growth were evaluated by treatment of cells (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) with HEX or SF5 at different concentrations for up to 72 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. Viable cells were counted in a 12 h interval using the trypan blue dye exclusion method. To assess DNA synthesis, 25 μL/well of 10 μCi/mL [3H]-methyl-thymidine (3H-Tdr; Amersham Biosciences, Brazil) were added for the last 24 h of culture. Then, the cells were harvested on filter paper and processed for the determination of of 3H-Tdr incorporation by liquid scintillation.

Cell cycle analysis

To determine the distribution of DNA content, K562 cells were treated with DNA staining solution as previously described[19]. Cells (2.5 × 105/mL) were incubated either in the absence (control) or in the presence of HEX or SF5 at 30 μg/mL for 36 h at 37°C and 5% CO2. After centrifugation (400 x g) for 5 min, 1 × 106 viable cells were suspended in DNA staining solution (0.3% Triton X-100 and 50 μg/mL propidium iodide [PI] in 43 mM citrate buffer) and maintained for 15 min at room temperature in the dark. Later, the samples were treated with 50 μg/mL ribonuclease A (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) in 43 mM citrate buffer pH 8.2 for 15 min at room temperature. PI fluorescence was measured (100,000 events per sample) using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (Becton Dickson, USA). The excitation wavelength for PI was 488 nm and the emission detected at 585 ± 15 nm. Analysis was done with the WinMDI 2.8 software.

Imunoblotting

Cells (2.5 × 105 cells/mL) were incubated with 50 μg/mL SF5 for different times. The whole cell lysate was prepared for the evaluation of phosphorylated (p-ERK 1/2) and total ERK 1/2 protein expression. Cells were washed twice in PBS, suspended in lysis buffer (50 mM HEPES pH 6.4, 1 mM MgCl2, 10 mM EDTA, and 1% Triton X-100), left 30 min on ice and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was stored in a freezer. Nuclear extracts were prepared as previously described[20] for the evaluation of NF-κB activation. Protein concentration was measured by the Lowry assay[21] using bovine serum albumin as standard. Proteins were denatured for 5 min in sample buffer (glycerol, β-mercaptoethanol, 10% SDS, 10 N NaOH and bromophenol blue) and 30 μg of protein per sample were resolved in a 12% or 15% sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS)-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) and transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane (Bio-Rad). Blots of nuclear (for NF-κB and histone) or whole cell extracts (for p-ERK 1/2 and total ERK 1/2) were blocked for 2 h at room temperature with 2% BSA and 0.1% Tween in PBS and then incubated overnight with the specific primary antibodies anti-p65 or anti-pERK 1/2 in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and 0.1% Tween. The membranes were washed three times, soaked for 1 h with the secondary antibody (horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-mouse IgG), and washed again with PBS-Tween 0.1%. Finally, blots were developed using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECL; Amersham). Blots were reincubated with anti-histone or anti-ERK 1/2 as loading control of nuclear or whole cell extracts, respectively.

RT-PCR for mRNA expression analysis

Total RNA of samples was extracted with the Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). RNA samples were treated with DNAse I and RNA integrity was confirmed by denaturing agarose gel electrophoresis. Reverse transcription reactions were performed as previously described[15]. cDNAs were used in 25 μL mixtures of PCR buffer, 0.2 mM of each dNTP, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 25 pmoles of each primer, and 1.0 U of Taq DNA polymerase platinum (Invitrogen). Primers, annealing temperature and cycles used were: β-actin forward primer: 5-TCCTGTGGCATCCACGAAACT-3, reverse primer: 5-GAAGCATTTGCGGTGGACGAT-3 (59°C, 30 cycles, 314 pb); Cyclin D1 forward primer: 5-TTGCTGCCCTTCTCCATGAT-3, reverse primer: 5-TCCCAACTGAAACCCAATGC-3 (55°C, 30 cycles, 334 pb); Cyclin E2 forward primer: 5-GATTTGTCCTTGGAGAACGG-3, reverse primer: 5-TTGGGTGTTGGTTCTTTGGTT-3 (57°C, 30 cycles, 499 pb), p21CIP/KIP forward primer: 5-TTGCTGCCCTTCTCCATGAT-3, reverse primer: (55°C, 30 cycles, 334 pb); Cyclin E2 forward primer: 5-TCCCAACTGAAACCCAATGC-3 (55°C, 30 cycles, 334 pb), c-myc forward primer: 5-GTCCTCGGATTCTCTGCTC-3, reverse primer: 5-GACTCTGACACTGTCCAACT-3, (60°C, 30 cycles, 342 pb). All genes examined were normalized to the housekeeping gene β-actin. PCR was performed in a Perkin Elmer GeneAmp PCR System 9600. Each PCR cycle consisted of an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 5 min followed by the appropriate number of cycles consisting of 94°C for 30 s, annealing at specific temperature for 30 s, and extension at 72°C for 1 min. Semi-quantitative analysis of the products was performed by 2% agarose gel electrophoresis and band intensities were determined by Lab Image software (Germany).

Statistical analysis

Significant differences between pairs of groups were accessed using Student’s t test, with a significance level set at p < 0.05.

Results

Effects of SF5 on leukemic cell growth

HEX subfractionation of EEPp resulted in a subfraction (SF5) with greater inhibitory effect on cell growth. SF5 treatment reduced K562 cell growth in a time and concentration  dependent  manner.  As  shown  in  Figure1,     signi-ficant reductions of 51.9 ± 12.7%, 66.2 ± 7.8% and 57.7 ± 19.6% in cell growth were observed after treating cells with 30 μg/mL SF5 for 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively, compared to control cultures. This inhibition increased to 83.6 ± 4.1%, 91.9 ± 1.5% and 85.4 ± 3.9%, respectively, with SF5 at 50 μg/mL. The significant inhibition indexes of SF5 at 24 h and 48 h were similar (p > 0.05) to those of the traditional antineoplasic agent MTX (84.8 ± 7.0%, 95.2 ± 1.8% and 97.7 ± 24.5% at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h, respectively).

Figure 1
figure 1

Effects of hexanic fraction (HEX) and SF5 hexanic subfraction on K562 leukemia cell growth. (A) 30 μg/mL, (B) 50 μg/mL. Cells (2.5 × 105/mL) were cultured for 24, 48 and 72 h either in the absence (control) or presence of HEX, SF5 or methotrexate (MTX, 50 μg/mL). Viable cells were counted by Trypan blue dye exclusion. Results represent the mean ± SD of three independent experiments. ap < 0.05, bp < 0.01 and cp < 0.001, versus control by Student’s t test.

Effects of SF5 on DNA synthesis and on the cell cycle

Since SF5 treatment inhibited the growth of K562 leukemic cells, its effect on DNA synthesis (Figure2A) and on the cell cycle (Figure2B) was analyzed. Both HEX and SF5 significantly inhibited DNA incorporation of 3H-methyl-thymidine in K562 cells when compared to control cultures with SF5 showing higher inhibitory indexes on cell proliferation than the original HEX fraction (Figure2A). The cell cycle profile of K562 leukemic cells was modified by treatment with SF5 (30 μg/mL). Cells accumulated in the G1 phase with concomitant reduction in the S and G2/M phases (Figure2B). Again, SF5 induced a more intensive anti-leukemic effect than the original HEX fraction. However, the mechanisms underlying this effect remain unknown.

Figure 2
figure 2

Effects of hexanic fraction (HEX) and SF5 hexanic subfraction on K562 cell proliferation. (A) 3H-methyl-thymidine incorporation into DNA. (B) Cell cycle analysis. Cells (2.5 × 105/mL) were cultured for 72 h in the absence (control) or presence of different HEX or SF5 concentrations. To each well, 0.25 μCi of 3H-methyl-thymidine was added 24 h before the end of cultures. For cell cycle analysis cells were treated with HEX or SF5, both at 30 μg/mL, for 36 h. Hypodiploid nuclei and debris were discarded from the analysis. Results express means ± SD of three independent experiments. All inhibition indexes were significantly different from control cultures. ap < 0.05 and cp < 0.001 versus HEX fraction by Student’s t test.

Effects of SF5 on gene expression

Cyclins play a key role in controlling cell cycle progression by positively regulating CDKs activities at appropriate time points of the cell cycle. Since D1 and E2 cyclins regulate the transition from G1 to the S phase and SF5 induced G1 arrest in K562 cells (Figure2B), these expression of these cyclins was analyzed after treating these cells with SF5 (50 μg/mL). Treatment with this subfraction increased cyclin D1 mRNA levels at all times studied while it reduced the expression of cyclin E2 after 12 and 24 h (Figure3) in K562 cells. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CKIs) control cell cycle progression by negatively regulating CDKs activities. In this work, SF5 treatment markedly increased p21 mRNA levels in K562 cells (Figure3). Concomitantly, this treatment also led to a reduction in the expression of the cell survival and proliferation up-regulator transcription factor c-myc (Figure3).

Figure 3
figure 3

Effects of SF5 on the expression of cyclins, p21 and c-myc in K562 cells. Cells (2.5 × 105/mL) were cultured in the absence (control) or presence of SF5 (50 μg/mL) for 36 h. RNA was extracted and the RT-PCR products were visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis as described in “Methods”. β-Actin mRNA was used as loading control.

Effects of SF5 on ERK 1/2 and NF-κB activation

The effects of SF5 treatment on cell proliferation related intracellular signaling were evaluated by determining the levels of phosphorylated-ERK 1/2 and the nuclear translocation of the transcription factor NF-κB. Control cultures showed a lower level of nuclear NF-κB expression at 1 h, which was progressively increased at 2 and 4 h while K562 cells treated with SF5 at 50 μg/mL showed reduced nuclear NF-κB expression at 2 h and 4 h (Figure4A). The level of total ERK 1/2 protein expression is higher than the phosphorylated form in all culture conditions (Figure4B) and treatment with SF5 inhibited led to an inhibition of ERK 1/2 phosphorylation (Figure4B).

Figure 4
figure 4

Effects of SF5 on the activation of NF-κB and ERK 1/2. (A) NF-κB protein nuclear translocation. (B) Phosphorylated ERK expression. Nuclear extracts (NF-κB) and whole cell lysates (pERK) were prepared as described in “Material and Methods”, from K562 cells (2.5 × 105/mL) treated with SF5 (50 μg/mL) for the indicated times. Proteins (50 μg) were resolved by SDS-PAGE, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes, probed with anti-p65 or anti-p-ERK and developed by chemiluminescence. Histone was used as a loading control for nuclear extracts and total ERK 1/2 for whole cell lysates.

Discussion

Previous studies with the EEPp reported an anti-leukemic effect by arresting K562 cell cycle in the G1 phase[15]. Similar results were also demonstrated for melanoma cells[18]. SF5, a terpenic subfraction obtained after extracting EEPp with hexane, contains epoxyfarnesol (32%), geranylgeraniol (4.6%) and the 7β-acetoxy-vouacapan (1.9%) derivatives, methyl 6α-acetoxy-7β-hydroxy-vouacapan-17β-oate (6%) and 6α-7β-diacetoxy-vouacapan-14β-oate (20.6%)[19]. Previous studies reported cytotoxic effects and apoptosis induction in leukemia cells by treatment with SF5[19]. Now this work demonstrates that SF5 treatment inhibits leukemia cell proliferation by down-regulating cell growth stimulating transcription factors and ERK 1/2 activation and by altering the expression of cell cycle regulators. Comparative analysis of the anti-proliferative effects of SF5 with the hexanic fraction of EEPp (HEX) from which it was obtained showed that SF5 treatment led to a higher inhibition in leukemic cell growth, DNA synthesis and in the cell cycle. This pronounced effect compared to HEX must be related to their different chemical composition. HEX contains other compounds that are not present in SF5, which may be contributing to its reduced inhibitory effect by either neutralizing the inhibitory action of SF5 compounds or inducing activation effects.

The inhibition of tumor cell proliferation has been demonstrated for traditional chemotherapeutic agents and potential anti-cancer drugs[22], as observed with MTX in this work. SF5 cytotoxic effects were also demonstrated on other tumor cell lines although they were lower than those on leukemia cells (data not shown). The finding of a terpenic subfraction with higher anti-tumor effect than the hexanic fraction of the original extract is of great value since it could represent a potential anti-tumor agent with fewer side effects. The anti-proliferative effects of SF5 treatment here observed were not due to the presence of ethanol in this subfraction since control cultures treated with ethanol in the same concentration did not exhibit these effects (data not shown).

Cyclin D is the first cyclin expressed by cells in response to favorable growth conditions[1]. In conjunction with CDK4/6, cyclin D mediates the initial phosphorylation of the Retinoblastoma protein (pRb). The kinase activity of the cyclin E/CDK2 complex then acts to maintain pRb in the hyper-phosphorylated state[2]. Any factor affecting these kinase activities could abrogate the normal inactivation of pRb and cause accumulation of cells in the G1 phase. The mechanisms involved in the in vitro anti-cancer activity of SF5 seem to be similar to those of EEPp[15], leading to the inhibition of cyclin E2 gene expression and resulting in cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase. SF5 treatment also increased cyclin D1 gene expression as did cell exposure to EEPp[15]. Other cell lines have also shown an increase in D1 cyclin expression associated with the inhibition of cell proliferation[23].

SF5 treatment also increased p21gene expression which may be collaborating to cell cycle inhibition. Several reports describe the up-regulation of p21[24] by anti-cancer drugs. According to the literature, p21 plays a direct role in mediating p53-induced G1 arrest[25]. On the other hand, as K562 cells have a mutation on the TP53 tumor suppressor gene[26], the effects of increased p21 gene expression on cell cycle arrest in this work must be related to a p53- independent mechanism, as seen during cellular senescence[27] and differentiation[26, 28]. The increased mRNA expression of both cyclin D1 and p21, observed with SF5 treatment could result in higher levels of these proteins and formation of p21-CDK4-cyclin D1 and/or p21-CDK6-Cyclin D1 complexes, decreasing CDK4 and CDK6-associated kinase activities in K562 cells[29]. Sequestration of cell cycle inhibitors (p21 and p27) is well established for D-cyclins[3]. Furthermore, SF5 exposure inhibited cyclin E mRNA expression that can lead to reduced formation of CDK2-cyclin E protein complex and, consequently, to a reduced CDK2 kinase activity. Cyclin E2 down-regulation has also been reported as an important effect of anti-cancer drugs[30].

The expression of cyclins and cell cycle inhibitors depends on different transcription factors and MAP kinases activities[3133]. Since ERKs signaling pathway stimulates c-myc expression[5], cyclin E2 gene transcription is activated by c-myc[7], and SF5 treatment inhibited both ERK 1/2 activation and c-myc and cyclin E2 gene expression, the cell cycle arrest observed in this work may be related to the inhibition of MAP kinase phosphorylation and to a reduced level of c-myc.

The up-regulation of cyclin D1 and p21 expression induced by SF5 treatment, despite the reduced activation of ERK 1/2, suggests that the expression of these proteins can be submitted to other regulatory mechanisms. Indeed, p21 and p27 gene expression can be regulated by the transcription factor AP-1[34] or by promoter methylation[35]. Otherwise, cyclin D1 gene expression is under the regulation of other transcription factors such as AP1 and STATs[36].

In addition, the transcription factor NF-κB, activated in certain cancers[37], is linked to the expression of different genes associated with cell proliferation such as c-myc[38] and E2[39]. NF-κB has also been an important target for anti-cancer treatment and this study demonstrated that SF5 exposure inhibited NF-κB translocation to the nucleus, probably inhibiting the expression of specific NF-κB targets, as here demonstrated for cyclin E2 and c-myc.

Conclusions

Concluding, SF5 treatment showed a minor chemical complexity and higher in vitro anti-leukemic action than HEX, which could represent a reduction of side effects for a potential anti-tumoral agent. SF5’s anti-leukemic action is linked to the inhibition of intracellular signaling, such as the lower activation of ERK 1/2 and NF-κB and the altered expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins, as demonstrated by increased p21 mRNA levels and down-regulation of c-myc and cyclin E2 expression.