Smac mimetic-derived augmentation of chemotherapeutic response in experimental pancreatic cancer
- 4.1k Downloads
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy, in part due to the overexpression of inhibitors of apoptosis proteins (IAPs). Smac is an endogenous IAP-antagonist, which renders synthetic Smac mimetics attractive anticancer agents. We evaluated the benefits of combining a Smac mimetic, JP1201 (JP), with conventional chemotherapy agents used for PDAC management.
Cell viability assays and protein expression analysis were performed using WST-1 reagent and Western blotting, respectively. Apoptosis was detected by annexin V/propidium iodide staining. In vivo tumor growth and survival studies were performed in murine PDAC xenografts.
JP and gemcitabine (Gem) inhibited PDAC cell proliferation with additive effects in combination. The percentage of early apoptotic cells in controls, JP, Gem and JP + Gem was 17%, 26%, 26% and 38%, respectively. JP-induced apoptosis was accompanied by PARP-1 cleavage. Similar additive anti-proliferative effects were seen for combinations of JP with doxorubicin (Dox) and docetaxel (DT). The JP + Gem combination caused a 30% decrease in tumor size in vivo compared to controls. Median animal survival was improved significantly in mice treated with JP + Gem (38 d) compared to controls (22 d), JP (28 d) or Gem (32 d) (p = 0.01). Animal survival was also improved with JP + DT treatment (32 d) compared to controls (16 d), JP (21 d) or DT alone (27 d).
These results warrant further exploration of strategies that promote chemotherapy-induced apoptosis of tumors and highlight the potential of Smac mimetics in clinical PDAC therapy.
KeywordsDocetaxel Gemcitabine Early Apoptotic Cell Animal Survival PDAC Cell
pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
- Gem or G
poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the fourth leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Prognosis of PDAC patients is very poor mostly due to the late diagnosis, aggressive nature of disease and an unusually high resistance to chemotherapy and radiation [1, 2, 3]. Despite advancements in diagnostic and surgical procedures and treatments, the overall 5-year survival remains less than 5% . Surgical resection remains the only option for long-term survival of patients. However, locally extended and metastatic disease limits the use of this procedure to only about 10% of patients . Therefore, the majority of pancreatic cancer patients are treated with systemic therapies. Gemcitabine (Gem), a fluorinated pyrimidine antagonist, is currently the most active single agent for locally advanced, non-operable and metastatic PDAC. However, Gem is only effective in a subset of patients, and improvements in overall survival remain considerably modest . Several other cytotoxic and chemotherapy agents such as cisplatin, fluorouracil, erlotinib, oxaliplatin, docetaxel and irinotecan have been tested as second-line chemotherapy or in combination with Gem for PDAC. However, most of these studies have failed to show any significant improvement in overall patient survival compared to single agent Gem [6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12]. Therefore, there is an urgent need for the development of therapeutic strategies that target novel mechanisms, and are either effective alone or enhance the activity of standard agents.
Many cancer cells possess apoptotic dysfunction that correlates with tumor aggressiveness and resistance to conventional chemotherapy . Various antiapoptotic proteins including inhibitors of apoptosis (IAPs) have been linked to cancer cell escape from apoptosis [14, 15]. A high percentage of pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumors express IAPs, including X-linked IAP (XIAP) [16, 17, 18] at elevated levels compared to normal tissue. Manipulating IAPs has been identified as a promising approach for cancer treatment. Second-mitochondria derived activator of caspase (Smac) is a mitochondrial protein released into the cytosol upon apoptosis induction or mitochondrial dysfunction. Smac inhibits IAPs and promotes caspase activation and apoptosis [19, 20]. Recently, small-molecule mimetics of Smac have been developed that can promote cancer cell apoptosis either alone or in combination with other proapoptotic agents [16, 21, 22]. In fact the Smac mimetic JP1201 (JP) has recently been shown to augment the Gem response in PDAC MIA PaCa-2 cells .
In the present study we evaluated the effect of JP on the in vitro and in vivo therapeutic efficacy of various cytotoxic chemotherapy agents in an effort to provide a more effective antitumor strategy for PDAC.
Cell culture and reagents
Human PDAC cell lines, AsPC-1, Panc-1, BxPC-3 and MIA PaCa-2 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD). Cell lines were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin solution (Sigma) at 37°C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. JP was obtained from Joyant Pharmaceuticals (Dallas, TX), Gem was purchased from Eli Lilly Corporations (Indianapolis, IN), doxorubicin (Dox) was purchased from Ben Venue Laboratories (Bedford, OH) and docetaxel (DT) was purchased from Sanofi-aventis (Bridgewater, NJ).
Cell viability assay
In vitro cell viability of PDAC cell lines was evaluated by using the colorimetric WST-1 reagent (Roche Diagnostics, Indianapolis, IN) as described earlier . The assay is based on the ability of viable cells to cleave the sulfonated tetrazolium salt WST-1 (4-[3-(4-iodophenyl)-2-(4-nitrophenyl)-2H-5-tetrazolio]-1,3-benzene disulfonate) by mitochondrial dehydrogenases. Briefly, PDAC cells (4,000 cells per well) were plated in a 96-well plate in regular growth medium and after 16 hours the medium was replaced with 2% FBS containing medium. After 5 hours incubation the cells were treated with JP, Gem, Dox or DT, either alone or in combination. After additional incubation of 72 hours, 10 μl WST-1 reagent was added in each well followed by incubation for 2 hours. The absorbance at 450 nm was measured using a microplate reader.
Western blot analysis
A monolayer of cells at 75 to 80% confluence was placed in 2% FBS containing medium for at least 5 hour before treatment with JP (10 μM), gemcitabine (10 μM) for 24 hours. Cells were lysed and equal amounts of total protein were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). The membranes were blocked for 1 hour at room temperature with gentle shaking in TBS-T (10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.6), 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween 20). The membranes were incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies: phospho-JNK, (Santa Cruz Biotechnologies, Santa Cruz, CA), poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) (Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA), α-tubulin or GAPDH (Sigma). The membranes were then incubated with corresponding HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce Biotechnologies, Rockford, IL) for 1 hour at room temperature. Specific bands were detected using the enhanced chemiluminescence reagent (ECL, Perkin Elmer Life Sciences, Boston, MA) on autoradiographic film and quantitated by densitometry.
Apoptosis assay by Annexin V-FITC and propidium iodide (PI) staining
Effect of JP and Gem on AsPC-1 cell apoptosis was detected by using the Annexin V-FITC apoptosis detection kit (BioVision, CA) as per manufacturer's protocol. Briefly, AsPC-1 cells were grown in 10% serum containing medium up to 80% confluence, medium was changed to 2% serum containing medium and incubated for 5 hours and then treated with JP (10 μM) and Gem (10 μM) for 12 hours. After incubation, cells were trypsinized and suspended in 1 ml of low serum medium. From each cell suspension 2 × 105 cell were centrifuged and re-suspended in 500 μl 1X binding buffer. In each sample 5 μl of Annexin V-FITC and 5 μl of PI was added, incubated for 5 minutes in dark and immediately analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur System, BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). The annexin V - FITC positive and PI-negative cells were considered to be early apoptotic cells.
All animal studies were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (Dallas, TX). In vivo animal studies were performed using 4-6 weeks old SCID mice purchased from an on campus facility. Tumor growth experiments were performed by orthotopically injecting 1 × 106 Panc-1 cells. Animals were examined by ultrasound and randomized into treatment groups when tumor size averaged 500 mm3 at approximately 8 weeks after tumor cell injection. Animals were injected intraperitoneally with PBS (control), JP (6 mg/kg in 100 μl PBS, three times weekly) and Gem (25 mg/kg in 100 μl PBS, three times weekly), either alone or in combination. Three mice from each treatment group were sacrificed at 24 hours of therapy while the remaining animals in each group received 2 weeks of therapy prior to sacrifice.
Animal survival studies were conducted in an intraperitoneal PDAC tumor model as previously described . Female SCID mice received 0.75 × 106 human AsPC-1 cells intraperitoneally. The animals were randomly grouped (n = 6 to 8 per group) and treated intraperitoneally with PBS (control), JP (6 mg/kg in 100 μl PBS, twice weekly), Gem (100 mg/kg in 100 μl PBS, twice weekly) and DT (3 mg/kg in 100 μl PBS, twice weekly), either alone or in combination for 14 days or as maintenance therapy. Animal weight was measured twice weekly and all animals were examined daily for signs of distress or development of jaundice. Moribund mice at risk for distress were euthanized in accordance with the local animal care committee protocol. Subsequently, animals were examined for presence and extent of intra-abdominal tumor.
In vitro cell proliferation assay results are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was analyzed by the two-tailed Student's t-test using GraphPad Prism 4 Software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). For in vivo studies, statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA for multiple group comparison and Student's t-test for the individual group comparison. In survival studies, statistical differences were analyzed by nonparametric survival statistics and logrank test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered to represent statistically significant group difference.
Effect of JP and Gem on PDAC cell proliferation
Effect of JP and Gem on PDAC apoptosis
We also measured cleavage of PARP-1 protein, a caspase-dependent apoptosis-marker protein, after JP and Gem treatment. A significant increase in the expression of cleaved PARP-1 protein was observed after treatment with JP, but not after exposure to Gem (Figure 2B).
Combination effects of JP and doxorubicin or docetaxel on PDAC cell proliferation
In vivoeffects of JP addition to gemcitabine and docetaxel
Resistance to conventional chemotherapy continues to be a challenge in PDAC. Acquired resistance to apoptosis, which is prevalent in PDAC, is a critical pathway that promotes resistance to conventional chemotherapy [17, 18]. Therefore, targeting apoptosis resistance has emerged as an attractive novel cancer therapeutic strategy [26, 27]. Small molecules with proapoptotic activity are particularly advantageous, as they are membrane permeable, inhibit antiapoptotic molecules, augment efficacy of current therapeutics and minimize side effects of single agent therapy. Smac mimetics represent a novel class of anticancer drugs that are currently undergoing clinical evaluation . We studied the combination treatment effects of a novel Smac mimetic, JP1201, in combination with the deoxycytidine analogue gemcitabine and the cell-mitosis inhibitor docetaxel in experimental pancreatic cancer.
Human PDAC cells lines have been shown to display marked heterogeneity towards Gem . A similar heterogeneity regarding Gem sensitivity was seen in our four lines tested. Nevertheless, we observed that JP inhibited the proliferation of all four PDAC cell lines, and that the combination of JP + Gem had additive effects. Antitumor activity of Smac mimetics is mediated through induction of apoptosis. We therefore explored if proliferation inhibition of PDAC cells after combination therapy is in part due to induction in apoptosis. Detection of early apoptotic cells by annexin V/PI staining demonstrated that JP and Gem moderately induced apoptosis, and JP + Gem had an additive effect. Smac mimetic-induced apoptosis involves caspase activation that cleaves PARP-1, a DNA repair enzyme, to produce 89 kDa or 24 kDa cleavage product. We observed a dramatic increase in the 89 kDa C-terminus cleavage product of PARP-1 after JP treatment indicating the involvement of caspases in JP-induced apoptosis. While Gem treatment for 12 hours caused an increase in annexin V positive cells, no PARP-1 cleavage was detected after 24 hours of Gem treatment; this finding is likely related to the fact that 24 hours incubation may not be enough to cause detectable levels of PARP-1 cleavage. Based on in vitro additive anti-proliferative and proapoptotic effects of JP and Gem together, we examined effects of these agents on in vivo animal survival and observed that the JP + Gem combination significantly increases the animal survival compared with controls or monotherapy. Our findings corroborate a recently published report  that the Smac mimetic JP1201 enhances chemotherapy response of Gem in PDAC cell lines; accordingly, the JP-mediated increase in antiproliferative response after Gem was greatest in Panc-1 cells followed by MIA PaCa-2, BxPC-3 and AsPC-1 cells. Correspondingly, a 30% reduction in tumor weight was observed in our orthotopic Panc-1 tumor experiment compared to a 50% reduction in orthotopic MIA PaCa-2 tumors in the previous study . In addition, a significant improvement in animal survival was observed with JP + Gem treatment in AsPC-1 xenografts compared with JP or Gem alone similar to the previous study . Of note, the lack of a significant reduction in tumor growth (Figure 5) by Gem alone in the present study is likely merely a result of the small number of animals in that tumor growth experiment, and does not pose a conflict with the significant improvement in animal survival seen after the same treatment (Figure 6A). Altogether, our results can thus support a more generalizable phenomenon in this context, as JP combination benefits have been obtained in four PDAC cell lines, and with other cytotoxic agents beyond gemcitabine.
Smac mimetics have been shown to enhance antitumor effects of several agents including cisplatin  and TRAIL [23, 31] in different cancer types. Docetaxel is a clinically well established anti-mitotic chemotherapy treatment for several cancers including breast, ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer . We explored the combination treatment effects of JP with other chemotherapy agents such as doxorubicin and docetaxel in experimental pancreatic cancer. In vitro studies showed that JP significantly enhanced antiproliferative effects of Dox and DT in all four PDAC cell lines tested. In addition JP and DT combination had significant enhanced effect on tumor regression and animal survival in pancreatic cancer xenografts. These results indicate that a potential clinical benefit to Smac-mimetic combination therapies does not appear to be chemotherapeutic agent specific, and that such approach may carry a wide range of indications.
Small molecule Smac mimetics have been shown to be particularly advantageous in overcoming chemotherapy resistance when resistance occurs through modulation of the NFkB-IAP pathway. Since several pancreatic cancer cell lines and tumors have been shown to overexpress IAPs (16-18), treatment of PDAC with JP in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents shows specific promise for becoming effective for this disease. Our present study supports this notion through preliminary, preclinical evidence. The potential to render traditionally non-effective agents more effective for clinical PDAC therapy is particularly intriguing in this context.
Chemotherapy-induced apoptosis of PDAC can be enhanced through JP1201, a Smac mimetic. The resulting combination improves apoptotic response, antiproliferative effects, local tumor control, and animal survival. This strategy shows promise for future clinical evaluation.
The authors thank Dr. Lai Wang for provision of JP1201, advice and technical support, and members of the Brekken and Schwarz labs for support and thoughtful discussion. This work was supported in part by the Effie Marie Cain Scholarship in Angiogenesis Research (to R. Brekken).
- 5.Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, et al: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 1997, 15 (6): 2403-2413.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Correale P, Messinese S, Marsili S, Ceciarini F, Pozzessere D, Petrioli R, Sabatino M, Cerretani D, Pellegrini M, Di Palma T, et al: A novel biweekly pancreatic cancer treatment schedule with gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid. Br J Cancer. 2003, 89 (2): 239-242. 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601045.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Duffy A, Kortmansky J, Schwartz GK, Capanu M, Puleio S, Minsky B, Saltz L, Kelsen DP, O'Reilly EM: A phase I study of erlotinib in combination with gemcitabine and radiation in locally advanced, non-operable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol. 2008, 19 (1): 86-91. 10.1093/annonc/mdm441.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Heinemann V, Quietzsch D, Gieseler F, Gonnermann M, Schonekas H, Rost A, Neuhaus H, Haag C, Clemens M, Heinrich B, et al: Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006, 24 (24): 3946-3952. 10.1200/JCO.2005.05.1490.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Louvet C, Labianca R, Hammel P, Lledo G, Zampino MG, Andre T, Zaniboni A, Ducreux M, Aitini E, Taieb J, et al: Gemcitabine in combination with oxaliplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: results of a GERCOR and GISCAD phase III trial. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (15): 3509-3516. 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Lutz MP, Van Cutsem E, Wagener T, Van Laethem JL, Vanhoefer U, Wils JA, Gamelin E, Koehne CH, Arnaud JP, Mitry E, et al: Docetaxel plus gemcitabine or docetaxel plus cisplatin in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: randomized phase II study 40984 of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Group. J Clin Oncol. 2005, 23 (36): 9250-9256. 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.1980.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Rocha Lima CM, Green MR, Rotche R, Miller WH, Jeffrey GM, Cisar LA, Morganti A, Orlando N, Gruia G, Miller LL: Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (18): 3776-3783. 10.1200/JCO.2004.12.082.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Van Cutsem E, van de Velde H, Karasek P, Oettle H, Vervenne WL, Szawlowski A, Schoffski P, Post S, Verslype C, Neumann H, et al: Phase III trial of gemcitabine plus tipifarnib compared with gemcitabine plus placebo in advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004, 22 (8): 1430-1438. 10.1200/JCO.2004.10.112.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Karikari CA, Roy I, Tryggestad E, Feldmann G, Pinilla C, Welsh K, Reed JC, Armour EP, Wong J, Herman J, et al: Targeting the apoptotic machinery in pancreatic cancers using small-molecule antagonists of the X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis protein. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007, 6 (3): 957-966. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-06-0634.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 22.Vogler M, Walczak H, Stadel D, Haas TL, Genze F, Jovanovic M, Bhanot U, Hasel C, Moller P, Gschwend JE, et al: Small molecule XIAP inhibitors enhance TRAIL-induced apoptosis and antitumor activity in preclinical models of pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer Res. 2009, 69 (6): 2425-2434. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2436.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 23.Dineen SP, Roland CL, Greer R, Carbon JG, Toombs JE, Gupta P, Bardeesy N, Sun H, Williams N, Minna JD, et al: Smac mimetic increases chemotherapy response and improves survival in mice with pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res. 70 (7): 2852-2861. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3892.Google Scholar
- 29.Akada M, Crnogorac-Jurcevic T, Lattimore S, Mahon P, Lopes R, Sunamura M, Matsuno S, Lemoine NR: Intrinsic chemoresistance to gemcitabine is associated with decreased expression of BNIP3 in pancreatic cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005, 11 (8): 3094-3101. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1785.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 30.Checinska A, Hoogeland BS, Rodriguez JA, Giaccone G, Kruyt FA: Role of XIAP in inhibiting cisplatin-induced caspase activation in non-small cell lung cancer cells: a small molecule Smac mimic sensitizes for chemotherapy-induced apoptosis by enhancing caspase-3 activation. Exp Cell Res. 2007, 313 (6): 1215-1224. 10.1016/j.yexcr.2006.12.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Petrucci E, Pasquini L, Petronelli A, Saulle E, Mariani G, Riccioni R, Biffoni M, Ferretti G, Benedetti-Panici P, Cognetti F, et al: A small molecule Smac mimic potentiates TRAIL-mediated cell death of ovarian cancer cells. Gynecol Oncol. 2007, 105 (2): 481-492. 10.1016/j.ygyno.2007.01.011.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2407/11/15/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.