BMC Neurology

, 11:69 | Cite as

Cerebral vein thrombosis: clinical manifestation and diagnosis

  • Christian Tanislav
  • Ralf Siekmann
  • Nicole Sieweke
  • Jens Allendörfer
  • Wolfgang Pabst
  • Manfred Kaps
  • Erwin Stolz
Open Access
Research article

Abstract

Background

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is a disease with a wide spectrum of symptoms and severity. In this study we analysed the predictive value of clinical signs and symptoms and the contribution of D-dimer measurements for diagnosis.

Methods

We evaluated consecutive patients admitted with suspected CVT receiving non-invasive imaging. Symptoms and symptom combination as well as D-dimer levels were evaluated regarding their diagnostic value.

Results

239 patients were included in this study, 170 (71%) were females. In 39 patients (16%) a CVT was found. For identifying a CVT patients underwent either a venous CT-angiography or MR-angiography or both. No combination of symptoms either alone or together with the D-dimer measurements had a sensitivity and positive predictive value as well as negative predictive value and specificity high enough to serve as red flag. D-dimer testing produced rates of 9% false positive and of 24% false negative results. For D-dimer values a Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (ROC) and the area under the curve (AUC = 0.921; CI: 0.864 - 0.977) were calculated. An increase of sensitivity above 0.9 results in a relevant decrease in specificity; a sensitivity of 0.9 matches a specificity value of 0.9. This corresponds to a D-dimer cut-off level of 0.16 μg/ml.

Conclusion

Imaging as performed by venous CT-angiography or MR-angiography has a 1 to 2 in 10 chance to detect CVT when typical symptoms are present. D-dimer measurements are of limited clinical value because of false positive and negative results.

Keywords

Positive Predictive Value Magnet Resonance Angiography Receiver Operating Characteristic Papilledema Cerebral Venous Thrombosis 

Abbreviations list

CVT

cerebral venous thrombosis

MRI

magnet resonance imaging

MRA

magnet resonance angiography

CTA

computed tomography angiography

PPV

positive predictive value

NPV

negative predictive value

PE

pulmonary embolism

DVT

deep vein thrombosis

ROC

Receiver Operating Characteristic curve

AUC

area under the curve

Background

Patients with cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) present with a remarkably wide spectrum of signs and symptoms. Most common are headaches (> 80%), seizures (approximately 40%), hemiparesis (approximately 40%), altered consciousness (15-20%), and papilledema (20-30%) [1, 2, 3]. The relative frequency in cohort of patients with increasing headache without previous headaches history or headaches in combination with neurological deficits or seizures has been reported at approximately 10%, but has not yet been confirmed by other studies [4].

The non-specificity of most of the presenting symptoms of CVT poses major problems in an emergency room setting, because i.e. it might be difficult to screen every patient with headaches for CVT by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Current data on the symptomatology of CVT give no information on the predictive value of specific modes of presentation or their combination. Elevated D-dimers have been reported to have a high diagnostic sensitivity and specificity [4]. Yet, other investigations found considerable rates of false positive and negative results [5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10].

In this study we aimed therefore to investigate the relative frequency of CVT in a cohort of patients with clinical symptoms suggestive of this disease. Further the predictive value of different clinical signs and symptoms in patients suspected to suffer of CVT should be determined.

Methods

Patients

In a retrospective study we analyzed all consecutive patients admitted to our neurological department between August 2002 and November 2007 who were initially suspected of suffering of CVT and underwent either magnetic resonance imaging and venous magnet resonance angiography (MRA) or venous computed tomography angiography (CTA). Routinely T1-, T2-weighted images, FLAIR, DWI, and T2* sequences were carried out. Diagnostic criteria followed usual guidelines [11]. Readers were not blinded to the patient's clinical situation. Patients were initially identified based on an imaging data base. Symptoms which lead to the suspicion of an underlying CVT were identified retrospectively by reviewing case files. The medical history and neurological examination were analyzed regarding the findings which led to the suspicion of CVT. Papilledema was assessed clinically by ophthalmoscopy. All patients with suspected papilledema were examined by an ophthalmologist. Headaches were recorded as acute when onset was ≤ 24 hours, or as subacute when they lasted > 1 day. Further, thrombus localization and the presence of venous infarcts were registered. D-dimers in serum were measured using a turbidimetric method with a normal reference range below 0.19 μg/ml and were recorded when performed on the day of admission. The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the local ethical committee of the Justus Liebig University of Giessen.

Statistical Evaluation

For defined parameters the positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity and specificity were calculated based on cross-tables. To compare nonparametric data the Mann-Whitney U-test was applied. For frequency data a χ2-test or when appropriate Fisher's exact test were used.

For the determination of different cut-off points for D-dimer levels indicating a CVT the true positive rate (sensitivity) in function of the false positive rate (1-specificity) was plotted to a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. For the estimation of the discriminatory accuracy of D-dimer measurement in indicating a CVT the area under the ROC curve (AUC) was calculated.

For identifying specific combinations of symptoms indicating a CVT, clusters were built applying the Schwarz's Bayesian criterion with logarithmic-likelihood distance measure.

Results

In total, we identified 239 patients (170 [71%] females, 69 [29%] males) who received MRI and venous MRA (188 patients, 78.7%) or venous CTA (61 patients, 25.5%) to rule out CVT; in 10 patients both procedures were performed. None had conventional angiography. Important demographic data are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic data

 

CVT

n = 39 (16.3%)

No CVT

n = 200 (83.7%)

p

Age (y)

43.9

42.5

0.73

Sex

  

0.93

   Males

12 (31%)

57 (29%)

 

   Females

27 (69%)

143 (71%)

 

Imaging

   

   MRI/MRA

30 (77%)

158 (79%)

0.94

   CTA

12 (31%)

49 (24%)

0.62

Symptoms/History

   

   Headaches

27 (69%)

145 (73%)

0.83

- acute (≤ 1day)

2 (5%)

34 (17%)

0.09

- subacte (> 1 day)

25 (64%)

111 (56%)

0.41

- unilateral

7 (18%)

30 (15%)

0.63

   Seizure (focal or generalized)

11 (28%)

19 (10%)

0.003

   Focal neurological deficit

17 (44%)

68 (34%)

0.33

   Papilledema

4 (10%)

4 (4%)

0.15

   Disturbed consciousness

0 (0%)

10 (5%)

0.32

   Pregnancy*

3 (11%)

12 (8%)

0.43

   Previous venous thrombosis

5 (13%)

24 (12%)

0.90

   Oral contraceptives*

6 (22%)

29 (20%)

0.49

D-Dimer measurement

29 (74%)

69 (35%)

0.001

   Increased§

22 (76%)

6 (9%)

0.001

   Absolute values (μg/ml), median (range)

0.21 (0.09 - 2.51)

0.07 (0.01 - 3.1)

0.001

Thrombus location

 

Not applicable

 

   Superior sagittal sinus

14 (36%)

  

   Transverse sinus

24 (83%)

  

   Sigmoid sinus

6 (21%)

  

   Internal jugular vein

3 (10%)

  

   Straight sinus

10 (34%)

  

   Cortical veins

1 (3%)

  

* limited to females.

§ limited to patients with D-dimer measurements, reference range below 0.19 μg/ml.

We found CVT in 16.3% of patients. Presenting symptoms and thrombus location are listed in Table 1. Highest PPV was observed for the combinations of headaches plus seizures (0.57), headaches plus papilledema (0.57) and focal neurological deficit plus papilledema (1.0) (Table 2, Figures 1 and 2).
Table 2

Positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity (Sens), specificity (Spec), and effectivity (Effect) of symptoms and symptom combinations in diagnosis of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT)

Parameter

CVT vs. no CVT

PPV

NPV

Sens

Spec

Effect

Headaches (any form)

27/39 vs. 145/200

0.17

0.82

0.69

0.28

0.34

   - plus seizure (focal or generalized)

4/39 vs. 3/200

0.57

0.85

0.10

0.99

0.84

   - plus focal neurological deficit

12/39 vs. 39/200

0.23

0.86

0.31

0.81

0.72

   - plus previous history of DVT or PE

5/39 vs. 24/200

0.33

0.84

0.07

0.97

0.82

   - plus papilledema

4/39 vs. 3/200

0.57

0.85

0.10

0.99

0.84

   - plus altered consciousness

0/39 vs. 1/200

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.99

0.83

   - plus oral contraceptives*

6/27 vs. 26/143

0.19

0.85

0.22

0.82

0.72

   - plus increased D-dimers§

14/29 vs. 7/69

0.67

0.81

0.48

0.89

0.78

Seizures (focal or generalized)

11/39 vs. 19/200

0.37

0.86

0.28

0.91

0.80

   - plus focal neurological deficit

2/39 vs. 3/200

0.40

0.84

0.05

0.99

0.83

   - plus previous history of DVT or PE

1/39 vs. 1/200

0.50

0.84

0.03

0.99

0.84

   - plus papilledema

0/39 vs. 0/200

-

-

-

-

-

   - plus altered consciousness

0/39 vs. 1/200

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.99

0.83

   - plus oral contraceptives*

1/27 vs. 1/143

0.03

0.96

0.17

0.80

0.78

   - plus increased D-dimers§

8/29 vs. 1/69

0.89

0.76

0.28

0.98

0.78

Focal neurological deficit

17/39 vs. 68/200

0.20

0.86

0.44

0.66

0.62

   - plus previous history of DVT or PE

1/39 vs. 6/200

0.14

0.83

0.02

0.97

0.81

   - plus papilledema

2/39 vs. 0/200

1.00

0.84

0.05

1.00

0.85

   - plus altered consciousness

0/39 vs. 2/200

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.99

0.83

   - plus oral contraceptives*

3/27 vs. 5/143

0.38

0.85

0.11

0.97

0.83

   - plus increased D-dimers§

11/29 vs. 1/69

0.92

0.79

0.38

0.98

0.81

Altered consciousness

0/39 vs. 10/200

0.00

0.83

0.00

0.95

0.79

   - plus previous history of DVT or PE

0/39 vs. 1/200

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.99

0.83

   - plus papilledema

0/39 vs. 0/200

-

-

-

-

-

   - plus oral contraceptives*

0/39 vs. 1/200

0.00

0.84

0.00

0.99

0.83

   - plus increased D-dimers§

0/29 vs. 1/69

0.00

0.70

0.00

0.99

0.69

Papilledema

4/39 vs. 7/200

0.36

0.85

0.10

0.97

0.82

   - plus previous history of DVT or PE

1/39 vs. 1/200

0.50

0.84

0.03

0.99

0.84

   - plus oral contraceptives*

1/39 vs. 1/200

0.50

0.84

0.03

0.99

0.84

   - plus increased D-dimers§

3/29 vs. 1/69

0.75

0.72

0.10

0.99

0.72

Increased D-dimers§

22/29 vs. 6/69

0.79

0.90

0.76

0.91

0.87

DVT: deep vein thrombosis of the legs

PE: pulmonary embolism

*limited to females

§limited to patients with D-dimer measurements

Figure 1

Positive and negative predictive values for main symptoms with and without D-dimer measurements.

Figure 2

Sensitivity and specificity for main symptoms with and without D-dimer measurements.

In 98 patients D-dimer levels were determined within 6 hours after admission. An increased D-dimer value was significantly more frequent in patients with CVT (p < 0.01); comparing absolute ranges higher values for D-dimers were detected in patients with CVT (median 0.21 μg/ml versus 0.07 μg/ml). D-dimer measurements primarily increased PPV and specificity (Figures 1 and 2). We found rates of 9% false positive and of 24% false negative results. For D-dimer values a ROC curve and the area under the curve (AUC = 0.921; CI: 0.864 - 0.977) were calculated (Figure 3). An increase of sensitivity above 0.9 results in a relevant decrease in specificity; a sensitivity of 0.9 matches a specificity value of 0.9 (Figure 3). The 90% percentile D-dimer value therefore corresponds to a cut-off level (0.16 μg/ml) for the identification of patients with CVT with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90%.
Figure 3

ROC curve for diagnosing a cerebral vein thrombosis by D-dimer measurement.

For identifying specific combinations of symptoms potentially indicating a CVT, 2 clusters were calculated. Considering redundancies the following parameters were selected: gender, seizure, focal neurological deficit, headache, papilledema, altered consciousness and previous DVT or PE. The quality of the clusters was slightly above average as indicated by the silhouette- cohesion- and separation coefficient (k = 0.4). The distribution of parameters among the 2 clusters is summarized in Table 3. Cluster 1 includes the majority of the patients with CVT (32/133 versus 7/106; p < 0.001); a sensitivity of 0.82 and a specificity of 0.50 respectively was calculated, respectively.
Table 3

Distribution of parameters among clusters

 

Cluster 1

n = 133 (55.6%)

Cluster 2

n = 106 (44.4%)

p

Sex

  

0.06

   Males

45 (34%)

24 (23%)

 

   Females

88 (66%)

82 (77%)

 

Symptoms

   

   Headaches

66 (50%)

106 (100%)

< 0.001

   Seizure (focal or generalized)

30 (23%)

0 (0%)

< 0.001

   Focal neurological deficit

85 (64%)

0 (0%)

< 0.001

   Papilledema

11 (8%)

0 (0%)

0.001

   Disturbed consciousness

10 (8%)

0 (0%)

0.003

Previous history of DVT or PE

17 (13%)

0 (0%)

< 0.001

CVT

32 (24%)

7 (7%)

< 0.001

DVT: deep vein thrombosis of the legs

PE: pulmonary embolism

CVT: cerebral vein thrombosis.

Discussion

The symptomatology of this patient cohort complies well with prospective CVT patients collectives [1, 4]. We found an astonishingly high rate of CVT of approximately 16% in our patients which also corroborates results of a prospective study aimed at investigating the diagnostic value of D-dimers [4] which found a rate of approximately 10%.

No symptom combination reached a high enough PPV and sensitivity as well as NPV and specificity to serve as a red flag although headaches plus seizures, headaches plus papilledema, and focal neurological deficit plus papilledema (Table 2, Figures 1 and 2) are suggestive of CVT. When typical symptoms are present there is a 1 to 2 in 10 chance to detect CVT by appropriate non-invasive imaging. Even a cluster analysis did not identify a combination of symptoms with acceptable sensitivity and specificity in indicating a CVT.

In our cohort D-dimer testing produced rates of 9% false positive and of 24% false negative results which sheds serious doubts on their usefulness in a clinical setting. In cohorts with typical symptomatology they may primarily increase specificity. In contrast, the ROC analysis revealed a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90% when considering a D-dimer cut-off value of 0.16 μg/ml; the AUC indicates a favorable discriminatory accuracy for D-dimer in indicating a CVT in general. However, considering normal ranges established in our laboratory (< 0.19 μg/ml) a value of 0.16 μg/ml might be regarded as normal. On the other hand, normal ranges for D-dimer values are derived considering venous embolic events such as pulmonary embolism or venous thrombosis of the pelvic and leg veins. Therefore a D-dimer measurement might have a beneficial impact, nonetheless the determined cut-of value of 0.16 μg/ml has to be regarded a pivotal finding, which requires verification.

A limitation of this investigation is its retrospective design. Missing patients are unlikely because the data base used is also the basis for hospital payment. In all cases the treating neurologist already considered CVT as potential differential diagnosis which may introduce a selection bias. Presumably this explains the relatively high percentage of CVT patients in our cohort. The higher rate of D-dimer measurements in CVT patients compared with non-CVT patients is most likely due to the fact, that treating neurologists were not blinded to the imaging results and diagnosis.

Conclusions

Even considering limitations the results of this investigation clearly emphasizes that when typical symptoms are present a rate of 10 to 20% of CVT can be suspected. CVT is not a rare condition. There is no typical red flag symptomatology. The usefulness of D-dimer measurements is limited because measurements produce false positive and negative results.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Ethical approval: The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the local ethical committee of the Justus Liebig University of Giessen.

Study sponsorship: None

Supplementary material

12883_2010_475_MOESM1_ESM.jpeg (42 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12883_2010_475_MOESM2_ESM.jpeg (37 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12883_2010_475_MOESM3_ESM.jpeg (27 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 3

References

  1. 1.
    Ferro JM, Canhao P, Stam J, Bousser MG, Barinagarrementeria F: Prognosis of cerebral vein and dural sinus thrombosis: results of the International Study on Cerebral Vein and Dural Sinus Thrombosis (ISCVT). Stroke. 2004, 35: 664-670. 10.1161/01.STR.0000117571.76197.26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stam J: Cerebral venous and sinus thrombosis: incidence and causes. Adv Neurol. 2003, 92: 225-232.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bousser MG: Cerebral venous thrombosis: diagnosis and management. J Neurol. 2000, 247: 252-258. 10.1007/s004150050579.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kosinski CM, Mull M, Schwarz M, Koch B, Biniek R, Schlafer J, Milkereit E, Willmes K, Schiefer J: Do normal D-dimer levels reliably exclude cerebral sinus thrombosis?. Stroke. 2004, 35: 2820-2825. 10.1161/01.STR.0000147045.71923.18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crassard I, Soria C, Tzourio C, Woimant F, Drouet L, Ducros A, Bousser MG: A negative D-dimer assay does not rule out cerebral venous thrombosis: a series of seventy-three patients. Stroke. 2005, 36: 1716-1719. 10.1161/01.STR.0000173401.76085.98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cucchiara B, Messe S, Taylor R, Clarke J, Pollak E: Utility of D-dimer in the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. J Thromb Haemost. 2005, 3: 387-389. 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2004.01078.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Misra UK, Kalita J, Bansal V: D-dimer is useful in the diagnosis of cortical venous sinus thrombosis. Neurol India. 2009, 57: 50-54. 10.4103/0028-3886.48822.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Talbot K, Wright M, Keeling D: Normal d-dimer levels do not exclude the diagnosis of cerebral venous sinus thrombosis. J Neurol. 2002, 249: 1603-1604. 10.1007/s00415-002-0893-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tardy B, Tardy-Poncet B, Viallon A, Piot M, Garnier P, Mohamedi R, Guyomarc'h S, Venet C: D-dimer levels in patients with suspected acute cerebral venous thrombosis. Am J Med. 2002, 113: 238-241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vatankhah B, Furst A, Schlachetzki F: Do normal d-dimer levels reliably exclude cerebral sinus thrombosis? A solution of problems?. Stroke. 2005, 36: 2528-2529.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Linn J, Bruckmann H: Cerebral Venous and Dural Sinus Thrombosis: State-of-the-Art Imaging. Klin Neuroradiol. 2010Google Scholar

Pre-publication history

  1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2377/11/69/prepub

Copyright information

© Tanislav et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christian Tanislav
    • 1
  • Ralf Siekmann
    • 2
  • Nicole Sieweke
    • 1
  • Jens Allendörfer
    • 3
  • Wolfgang Pabst
    • 4
  • Manfred Kaps
    • 1
  • Erwin Stolz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of NeurologyJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Department of NeuroradiologyJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany
  3. 3.Department of NeurologyNeurologische Klinik Bad SalzhausenGermany
  4. 4.Institute for Biomedicine and EpidemiologyJustus Liebig UniversityGiessenGermany

Personalised recommendations