Ventriculo-atrial gradient due to first degree atrio-ventricular block: a case report
Isolated, asymptomatic first degree AV block with narrow QRS has not prognostic significance and is not usually treated with pacemaker implantation. In some cases, yet, loss of AV synchrony because of a marked prolongation of the PR interval may cause important hemodynamic alterations, with subsequent symptoms of heart failure. Indeed, AV synchrony is crucial when atrial systole, the "atrial kick", contributes in a major way to left ventricular filling, as in case of reduced left ventricular compliance because of aging or concomitant structural heart disease.
We performed a trans-septal left atrium catheterization aimed at evaluating the entity of a mitral valve stenosis in a 72-year-old woman with a marked first-degree AV block, a known moderate aortic stenosis and NYHA class III symptoms of functional deterioration. We occurred in a deep alteration in cardiac hemodynamics consisting in an end-diastolic ventriculo-atrial gradient without any evidence of mitral stenosis. The patient had a substantial improvement in echocardiographic parameters and in her symptoms of heart failure after permanent pacemaker implantation with physiological AV delay.
We conclude that if a marked first degree AV block is associated to instrumental signs or symptoms of heart failure, the restoration of an optimal AV synchrony, achieved with dual-chamber pacing, may represent a reasonable therapeutic option leading to a consequent clinical improvement.
KeywordsAortic Valve Replacement Mitral Stenosis Pacemaker Implantation Aortic Valve Disease Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
New York Heart Association
Loss of atrio-ventricular (AV) synchrony due to first-degree AV block may cause important hemodynamic alterations, with subsequent decrease in cardiac output and symptoms of heart failure. Indeed, AV synchrony is crucial when atrial systole contributes in a major way to left ventricular (LV) filling, as in case of reduced LV compliance because of aging or concomitant structural heart disease. We present the case of a patient with first degree AV block, associated with aortic valve disease, who received an evident clinical benefit by sequential pacing despite having refused aortic valve replacement as a first-line therapeutic option.
We discussed with the patient the therapeutic options : she preferred to defer aortic valve replacement, whereas accepted to undergo permanent pacing. We performed an echocardiographic evaluation of systolic and diastolic function before pacemaker implantation (Table 1). Of note, the functional deterioration could be explained by the evidence of a grade II diastolic dysfunction: transmitral flow was showing a high-velocity (150 cm/s) single filling wave with a deceleration time of 155 ms. Dual-chamber pacemaker implantation with optimal restoration of AV synchrony (programmed AV delay 150 ms) resulted in clinical improvement up to NYHA class II on the same medications. Since both sinus node function and atrial sensing were satisfying, ventricular pacing was triggered by P wave with a QRS duration of 120 ms [3, 4, 5]. The echocardiographic evaluation 2 days after pacemaker implantation showed a reduction of both diastolic dysfunction to grade I (pattern of abnormal relaxation with an E/A ratio of 0.6) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure to 28 mmHg, whereas cardiac output appeared to be slightly improved (Table 1) despite the depletive effect of furosemide could have kept the systolic performance lower than expected in such a hypertrophied, non-enlarged left ventricle with aortic stenosis. The patient is now under close echocardiographic monitoring for the optimal timing of aortic valve replacement.
Echocardiographic parameters in basal conditions and 2 days after pacemaker implantation.
2 days after implantation
LV ED diameter (mm)
LV ES diameter (mm)
LV ED volume (ml)
LV ES volume (ml)
LV Ejection Fraction (%)
LV mass (g)
LVOT VTI (cm)
Stroke volume (ml)
Cardiac output (L/min)
Cardiac index (L/min/m2)
Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (mmHg)
Isolated, asymptomatic first degree AV block with narrow QRS has not prognostic significance and is not usually treated with pacemaker implantation in clinical practice. Yet, a hemodynamic condition similar to that of pacemaker syndrome [7, 8, 9, 10] may occur when a marked first-degree AV block compromises the physiological sequence of events in the cardiac cycle. Indeed, either, with longer PR intervals atrial, contraction takes place during the preceding ventricular systole against closed AV valves[7, 10] or, with less long PR intervals, it falls during the early or the mid ventricular diastole, shortening the diastolic period itself and creating an abnormal ventriculo-atrial gradient, as in the present case, possibly leading to reversal diastolic AV flow, provided that LV pressure is higher than atrial one during atrial relaxation[9, 12, 13]. Anyway, the hemodynamic consequences are an increase in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and a related decrease in cardiac output. Such changes, indeed, are especially harmful both in case of LV systolic[9, 14, 15, 16] and diastolic (as in the present case) dysfunction and may be, at least in part, antagonized with permanent pacemaker implantation[17, 18]. Thus, a properly timed atrial contraction, the "atrial kick", is necessary for optimal LV systolic function by increasing LV end-diastolic pressure while maintaining a low mean left atrial pressure.
We conclude that if a marked first degree AV block is associated to instrumental signs or symptoms of heart failure, the restoration of an optimal AV synchrony, achieved by dual-chamber pacing and despite permanent right ventricular stimulation[4, 5], may represent a reasonable therapeutic option leading to a consequent clinical improvement.
GA has been admitted to the PhD course in "Cardiovascular Imaging" at the University of Messina, Italy and has received a Grant by the Italian Society of Cardiology for a Fellowship in Interventional Cardiology at the Department of Cardiac Surgery of the Tor Vergata University of Rome, Italy.
Written consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.
- 5.Maurer DE, Naegeli B, Straumann E, Bertel O, Frielingsdorf J: Quality of life and exercise capacity in patients with prolonged PQ interval and dual chamber pacemakers: a randomized comparison of permanent ventricular stimulation vs intrinsic AV conduction. Europace. 2003, 5 (4): 411-417. 10.1016/S1099-5129(03)00087-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Prech M, Grygier M, Mitkowski P, Stanek K, Skorupski W, Moszynska B, Zerbe F, Cieslinski A: Effect of restoration of AV synchrony on stroke volume, exercise capacity, and quality-of-life: can we predict the beneficial effect of a pacemaker upgrade?. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2001, 24 (3): 302-307. 10.1046/j.1460-9592.2001.t01-1-00302.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Nishimura RA, Hayes DL, Holmes DRJ, Tajik AJ: Mechanism of hemodynamic improvement by dual-chamber pacing for severe left ventricular dysfunction: an acute Doppler and catheterization hemodynamic study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995, 25 (2): 281-288. 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00419-Q.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2261/5/23/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.