BMC Neuroscience

, 16:P247 | Cite as

Brief mindfulness training alters causal brain connections in mTBI

Poster presentation
  • 339 Downloads

Keywords

Traumatic Brain Injury Default Mode Network Mindfulness Training Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Posterior Cingulate Cortex 

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a significant cause of disability in the United States and the mild TBI (mTBI) is the most prevalent. Previous research indicates the positive effect of mindfulness training on symptoms of chronic mTBI such as cognitive functioning and emotion [1]. However it remains unclear which brain regions play a crucial role in mTBI recovery and the causal relationship among these regions. Here we apply a dynamic causal modeling (DCM) in resting state fMRI [2] to demonstrate the causal relationships among the core regions involved in mTBI.

Fourteen veteran students with mTBI were recruited through campus advertisements. We used 2 weeks of integrative body-mind training as mindfulness intervention, previously reported in our series of randomized studies [3, 4]. All data were collected using a 3-Telsa Siemens Skyra scanner. Functional data were processed using the Data Processing Assistant for Resting-State fMRI, which is based on SPM and Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit. Based on literature, we specified four regions of interest within default mode network (DMN) - medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), and bilateral inferior parietal lobule (Left IPL and Right IPL), same regions and coordinates as in previous sDCM studies [2, 5]. Based on SPM12, we estimated and specified the DCM for each subject and later compared the differences of effective connectivity before and after mindfulness. Our results suggest the different causal relationships following mindfulness training. Specifically, after training there was a significant decrease in the strength of excitatory input from mPFC to PCC, and a significant increase in the strength of inhibitory input from mPFC to LIPL (all p<0.05).

Conclusions

Resting DCM can differentiate the causal brain connections before and after mindfulness training, and provide insight into the brain mechanisms of altered DMN dynamics underlying mTBI recovery, suggesting the changes in information flow in these distributed systems involved in mTBI intervention.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research.

References

  1. 1.
    Azulay J, Smart CM, Mott T, Cicerone KD: A pilot study examining the effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on symptoms of chronic mild traumatic brain injury/postconcussive syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013, 28: 323-31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Razi A, Kahan J, Rees G, Friston KJ: Construct validation of a DCM for resting state fMRI. Neuroimage. 2015, 106: 1-14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tang YY, et al: Short-term meditation training improves attention and self-regulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2007, 104: 17152-17156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tang YY, et al: Central and autonomic nervous system interaction is altered by short term meditation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2009, 106: 8865-70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Di X, Biswal BB: Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage. 2014, 86: 53-9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Tang and Tang 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychological SciencesTexas Tech UniversityLubbockUSA

Personalised recommendations