Advertisement

BMC Neuroscience

, 15:P89 | Cite as

Bursting neurons in the hippocampal formation convey information about LFP features

  • Maria Constantinou
  • Daniel H Elijah
  • Daniel Squirrell
  • Inés Samengo
  • John Gigg
  • Marcelo A Montemurro
Open Access
Poster presentation

Keywords

Pyramidal Neuron Pyramidal Cell Hippocampal Formation Local Field Potential Postsynaptic Neuron 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Local field potentials (LFPs) are thought to reflect the combined activity of neuronal populations projecting onto a local area. Accumulating evidence suggests that LFPs can contribute to neural information encoding by providing a reference signal that can boost the information conveyed by spikes [1, 2]. Although some mechanisms have been proposed to explain how this extra information might be made available to downstream neurons [3, 4], they are yet to be tested against experimental data. In this study, we used both modelling of hippocampal pyramidal neurons and in-vivo data to investigate how neurons in the hippocampal formation can use bursting to convey information about features of LFPs. Intrinsic bursts produced by pyramidal neurons provide a graded signal determined by the burst spike count. Fitting a dual-compartment model of a pyramidal cell to realistic burst firing [3, 5, 6] shows that bursts with spike counts of 1 (tonic firing), 2 and 3 or more are triggered with a differential locking with respect to features of the reference LFPs. This locking provides an explicit mechanism for bursts of different spike count to transmit information contained in LFPs to downstream neurons. We tested the model predictions by analysing recordings of spontaneous LFPs and spiking activity from areas CA1 and subiculum of urethane-anaesthetised rats. Statistical analyses and information theory were used to quantify the encoding capacity of bursts to discriminate basic features of LFPs, such as phase, slope, instantaneous voltage and energy. In agreement with model predictions, features such as phase and slope were found to be the most reliable single features correlated to burst size. We also applied multiple discriminant analysis to characterise the set of optimal LFP features that were maximally discriminated by different bursts. We found that burst spike count conveyed significantly more information about these optimal LFP features compared to simple LFP parameters. Our results provide the first in-vivo evidence that neurons can use bursts to convert information about LFP features into a spike-count code that is suitable to be decoded by postsynaptic neurons in distant neural networks.

References

  1. 1.
    Montemurro MA, Rasch MJ, Murayama Y, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S: Phase-of-firing coding of natural visual stimuli in primary visual cortex. Curr Biol. 2008, 18 (5): 375-380. 10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.023.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kayser C, Montemurro MA, Logothetis NK, Panzeri S: Spike-phase coding boosts and stabilizes information carried by spatial and temporal spike patterns. Neuron. 2009, 61 (4): 597-608. 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.01.008.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samengo I, Montemurro MA: Conversion of phase information into a spike-count code by bursting neurons. PLoS ONE. 2010, 5 (3): e9669-10.1371/journal.pone.0009669.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Masquelier T, Hugues E, Deco G, Thorpe SJ: Oscillations, phase-of-firing coding, and spike timing-dependent plasticity: an efficient learning scheme. J Neurosci. 2009, 29 (43): 13484-13493. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2207-09.2009.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kepecs A, Lisman J: Information encoding and computation with spikes and bursts. Network: Comput Neural Syst. 2003, 14 (1): 103-118. 10.1080/net.14.1.103.118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinsky PF, Rinzel J: Intrinsic and network rhythmogenesis in a reduced Traub model for CA3 neurons. J Comput Neurosci. 1994, 1 (1-2): 39-60. 10.1007/BF00962717.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Constantinou et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Constantinou
    • 1
  • Daniel H Elijah
    • 1
  • Daniel Squirrell
    • 1
  • Inés Samengo
    • 2
  • John Gigg
    • 1
  • Marcelo A Montemurro
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Life SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
  2. 2.Centro Atómico Bariloche and Instituto BalseiroSan Carlos de BarilocheArgentina

Personalised recommendations