BMC Genomics

, 15:1011 | Cite as

Illumina identification of RsrA, a conserved C2H2 transcription factor coordinating the NapA mediated oxidative stress signaling pathway in Aspergillus

  • Jin Woo Bok
  • Philipp Wiemann
  • Graeme S Garvey
  • Fang Yun Lim
  • Brian Haas
  • Jennifer Wortman
  • Nancy P KellerEmail author
Open Access
Research article
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Eukaryote microbial genomics



Chemical mutagenesis screens are useful to identify mutants involved in biological processes of interest. Identifying the mutation from such screens, however, often fails when using methodologies involving transformation of the mutant to wild type phenotype with DNA libraries.


Here we analyzed Illumina sequence of a chemically derived mutant of Aspergillus nidulans and identified a gene encoding a C2H2 transcription factor termed RsrA for regulator of stress response. RsrA is conserved in filamentous fungal genomes, and upon deleting the gene in three Aspergillus species (A. nidulans, A. flavus and A. fumigatus), we found two conserved phenotypes: enhanced resistance to oxidative stress and reduction in sporulation processes. For all species, rsrA deletion mutants were more resistant to hydrogen peroxide treatment. In depth examination of this latter characteristic in A. nidulans showed that upon exposure to hydrogen peroxide, RsrA loss resulted in global up-regulation of several components of the oxidative stress metabolome including the expression of napA and atfA, the two bZIP transcription factors mediating resistance to reactive oxygen species (ROS) as well as NapA targets in thioredoxin and glutathione systems. Coupling transcriptional data with examination of ΔrsrAΔatfA and ΔrsrAΔnapA double mutants indicate that RsrA primarily operates through NapA-mediated stress response pathways. A model of RsrA regulation of ROS response in Aspergillus is presented.


RsrA, found in a highly syntenic region in Aspergillus genomes, coordinates a NapA mediated oxidative response in Aspergillus fungi.


Aspergillus Next generation sequencing Mutagenesis Stress response AP-1 CCAAT 


Living organisms including fungi sense and respond to various environmental stresses. Responses to these stresses can be associated with morphological and chemical differentiation, including sporulation and secondary metabolite production in filamentous fungi [1]. Several studies have correlated the synthesis of specific metabolites and spore development with oxidative stress [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7]. One system known to coordinate sporulation and development and, more recently oxidative stress, is the heterotrimeric transcriptional regulator known as the Velvet Complex [8, 9].

The best-described members of the Velvet Complex are the methyltransferase LaeA (reviewed in [10]) and the scaffold protein VeA (reviewed in [11]). As both proteins regulate a substantial proportion of the fungal genome [12, 13, 14], efforts have been focused on characterizing LaeA and VeA signaling pathways with the goal of thoroughly understanding regulation of either secondary metabolism or differentiation processes in fungi. Consistent with the broad regulation of the transcriptome by the Velvet Complex, LaeA and VeA regulate other aspects of fungal development including the oxidative stress response [5, 15, 16, 17, 18]. Efforts in understanding how LaeA and VeA regulate so many processes in fungal development have centered on identifying mutations that are able to restore a phenotype of interest in these deletion mutants (ΔlaeA and ΔveA). Restoration of sterigmatocystin, a highly produced secondary metabolite in A. nidulans regulated by both LaeA and VeA, is often used for screening purposes [19, 20].

Mutations arising from chemical mutagenesis screens, in particular, are both costly and time-consuming to identify through standard DNA library complementation. Recently next generation sequencing methods have been successfully applied to identify mutant genes in a number of major model organisms [21, 22] and advances in these technologies have significantly reduced cost, while making this approach accessible for other genetically tractable systems, including fungal organisms such as Sordaria macrospora [23, 24]. Here we describe our identification of a C2H2 transcription factor, termed RsrA, using Illumina technology to interrogate a mutant arising from a 4-nitroquinoline-1-oxide (4-NQO) screen of a ΔlaeA mutant.

Although loss of rsrA corroborated the original mutation (e.g. restoration of sterigmatocystin synthesis in the ΔlaeA background), the primary impact of rsrA loss was on resistance to oxidative stress and reduced reproductive development. The rsrA allele is located in a syntenic region in the genomes of Aspergillus spp. and its function is conserved in A. nidulans, A. flavus and A. fumigatus. In depth exploration of the oxidative stress metabolome in A. nidulans supports a model where RsrA governs fungal response to reactive oxygen species (ROS) through the conserved bZIP transcription factor NapA and its downstream targets.


Ilumina sequence analysis leads to identification of A. nidulans rsrA

Mutagenesis of a ΔlaeAΔstcEveA1 strain, RJW160.15, led to identification of one mutant, MGG1.124, in which norsolorinic acid was restored to greater than wild-type levels (Additional file 1: Figure S1). Norsolorinic acid (NOR), which accumulates when stcE is deleted, is a visible precursor to sterigmatocystin and used as a convenient screen for identifying mutations affecting sterigmatocystin biosynthesis [25]. Five backcrosses to MGG1.124 were made in efforts to minimize SNPs. Two progenies (RJW207.1 and RJW207.3) carrying the same secondary metabolite phenotype as the original mutant (e.g. restored NOR production in a ΔlaeAΔstcEveA1 background) were sequenced using Illumina technology. Based on SNP analysis, we identified 11 genes with coding region polymorphisms associated with the MGG1.124 mutant. Further culling through two more sexual crosses generating RJW207A, RJW207B, and RJW207C coupled with PCR-based SNP detection enabled us to identify one gene, AN0273, encoding a putative C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor as the primary MGG1.124 lesion. Sequence analysis of AN0273 in MGG1.124 showed it harbored a C -> T transition at codon 163 leading to an early stop codon in the predicted ORF.

The wild type AN0273 ORF was deleted as determined by Southern analysis and examined in both veA and veA1 backgrounds (wild type stcE) with and without an intact laeA gene (Additional file 2: Figure S2A). As shown in Figure 1A, extracts from these near isogenic strains revealed that loss of AN0273 in the ΔlaeA background restored sterigmatocystin synthesis, thus supporting the original mutant phenotype. The ΔAN0273 strain produced considerably more sterigmatocystin than wild type. We also found that AN0273 loss could partially restore sterigmatocystin in ΔveA (Figure 1A) and that, dependent on the time point examined, AN0273 was mis-regulated in both ΔveA and ΔlaeA backgrounds (Figure 1B).
Figure 1

Sterigmatocystin production and expression analysis of A. nidulans ΔrsrA . (A) Thin Layer Chromatography analysis of chloroform extracts for metabolite production by the wild type (WT), ΔlaeA, ΔrsrA, ΔrsrAΔlaeA, ΔveA, and ΔveAΔrsrA, (RDIT9.32, RJW41A, RJW263.2 and RJW273.17, RJW112.2, and RJW113.4, respectively) strains grown on solid glucose minimal media (GMM) under light and dark at 37°C for 5 days in triplicate. ST, sterigmatocystin standard. *: 2.5 μL loading out of 100 μL sample. Others were loaded with 5 μL. (B) Gene expression analysis of A. nidulans strains, wild type (WT), ΔlaeA, ΔrsrA, ΔrsrAΔlaeA, ΔveA, and ΔveAΔrsrA grown on liquid GMM at 37°C, 225 rpm for 48 and 60 h in duplicate. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNA is indicated for loading.

Despite the impact on sterigmatocystin and its precursors, other secondary metabolites were not greatly impacted in these growth conditions nor did deletion of this gene have a significant effect on secondary metabolism in A. fumigatus and A. flavus (data not shown). Hence, AN0273 was named rsrA (regulator of stress response with mutated allele named rsrA163) for its association with the stress response in Aspergilli as detailed below.

RsrA is required for both meiotic and mitotic spore development

Sterigmatocystin production is coupled with both asexual and sexual sporulation in A. nidulans and therefore we examined both mitotic and meiotic spore production as well as general growth in the ΔrsrA mutant. The ΔrsrA strain exhibited a sick growth phenotype, with reduced radial growth; this reduction in radial growth was apparent in all double mutants as well (Additional file 3: Figure S3 and Additional file 4: Figure S4). An examination of conidia and ascospore production showed that rsrA loss nearly eliminated production of both spores, regardless of genetic background (Figure 2). Complementation of ΔrsrA with its wild-type allele largely restored phenotypes to that of wild type levels for growth and sporulation patterns; however sterigmatocystin production was only partially restored (Additional file 3: Figure S3).
Figure 2

Average radial growth, and sexual and asexual spore production of A. nidulans strains, WT, ΔlaeA , ΔrsrA , ΔrsrAΔlaeA , ΔveA , and ΔveAΔrsrA (RDIT9.32, RJW41A, RJW263.2 and RJW273.17, RJW112.2, and RJW113.4 respectively). Average radial growth on solid GMM under light (A) and dark (B) at 37°C for 5 days in triplicate, respectively. Asexual spore production of each strain grown at 37°C for 5 days in the light (C) and dark (D), respectively. Sexual spore production after 5 days in the dark (E). Error bars indicate standard deviations for triplicates of each strain calculated by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Different letters indicate statistically differences (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test.

RsrA is a conserved protein affecting development in Aspergilli including spore (A. fumigatus, A. flavus) and sclerotia (A. flavus) production

Putative RsrA orthologs are located in a highly syntenic region of multiple Aspergilli genomes (Additional file 5: Figure S5). We thus wondered if the protein might play any similar role in other Aspergilli and therefore deleted the putative ortholog in two A. fumigatus strains and one A. flavus strain (Southern blots shown in Additional file 2: Figure S2B, C, and D). A visual examination of the mutants showed a distinct phenotype in the A. flavus mutant and in the CEA17 KU80Δ but not the Af293 A. fumigatus background (Additional file 6: Figure S6).

As one major impact of rsrA loss on A. nidulans was on reproduction development, we assessed asexual sporulation in the A. fumigatus and A. flavus mutants and sclerotia production in the latter species. All three rsrA deletion strains were examined for spore production. Figure 3A and B illustrate that similar to A. nidulans, both A. fumigatus and A. flavus ΔrsrA strains displayed reduced conidia production. Additionally, rsrA loss greatly reduced sclerotia production in A. flavus (Figure 3C). Sclerotia are analogous developmental structures to cleistothecia and can house ascospores when opposite mating types of A. flavus are paired [26]. Sexual development was not examined in the A. fumigatus strain due to the length of time needed to assess this process in this species [27].
Figure 3

Reproductive development in A. flavus and A. fumigatus. (A) Asexual spore production of the respective A. fumigatus strain. Error bars indicate standard deviations for triplicates of each strain. Asterisks indicate significance as calculated by unpaired t test: ** = p-value <0.01; *** = p-value <0.0001. (B) Asexual spore production of the indicated A. flavus strains. Error bars indicate standard deviations for triplicates of each strain. Asterisk indicates significance as calculated by unpaired t test: * = p-value <0.05. (C) Sclerotia production in A. flavus. Solid GMM with 2% sorbitol medium for sclerotia production was inoculated with 104 spores and incubated for 7 days in the dark. Error bars indicate standard deviations for triplicates of each strain calculated by ANOVA. Asterisk indicates significance as calculated by unpaired t test: *** = p-value <0.0001.

A conserved role for RsrA in sensitivity to hydrogen peroxide

As the rsrA gene was induced by camptothecin in a study assessing DNA damage in A. nidulans [28], we thought RsrA might be involved in a stress response in A. nidulans and possibly other Aspergilli. Therefore, ΔrsrA mutants and their wild type controls were assessed for response to a variety of challenges including exposure to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), tert-butyl hydroperoxide (tBOOH), camptothecin, alkaline pH, sodium chloride, sorbitol and congo red (Figure 4, Additional file 7: Figure S7).
Figure 4

Growth phenotypes in response to H 2 O 2 of A. nidulans , A. fumigatus and A. flavus wild-type strains, respective rsrA deletants and the A. nidulans mutant RJW207.B ( rsrA163 ). Serial dilutions of the indicated strains were point-inoculated on GMM with or without 4 mM H2O2 and incubated in the dark at 29°C and 37°C, respectively.

A conserved response was observed to hydrogen peroxide challenge where all four ΔrsrA mutants – although not the 6th backcross progeny mutant RJW207B (rsr163) possibly due to containing veA1 and ΔlaeA alleles - grew better than wild type (Figure 4). Supporting the results from the growth assay on hydrogen peroxide, a hydrogen peroxide diffusion assay showed a reduced zone of growth inhibition in the ΔrsrA mutants compared to the respective wild type strains of A. nidulans, A. fumigatus and A. flavus (Figure 5A). Additionally, in the zones of growth inhibition an increased formation of air bubbles was observed in the ΔrsrA mutants compared to the respective wild types of all the Aspergilli (Figure 5B). Fungi produce catalases in order to detoxify hydrogen peroxide into molecular oxygen and water [29], thereby forming oxygen air bubbles in the solidified agar as shown in Figure 5B. Addition of increasing concentrations of the reducing agent glutathione (GSH) decreased air bubble formation in all strains, but the formation was still more apparent in the ΔrsrA strains compared to their respective wild types.
Figure 5

Hydrogen peroxide diffusion assay and catalase activity assay. (A) Diameter of growth inhibition of the indicated strains after 24 h at 37°C (A. nidulans and A. fumigatus Af293) and 29°C (A. flavus). Asterisks indicate significance as calculated by unpaired t test: * = p-value <0.05; ** = p-value <0.01. (B) Air bubble formation indicative of catalase activity in the growth inhibition zone after 48 h of the indicated strains.

RsrA regulates critical stress transcriptional pathways in A. nidulans

Considering that the conserved phenotypes of the rsrA mutants in the three Aspergillus spp. examined center around hydrogen peroxide resistance and development (which is known to involve ROS species as signaling molecules [7, 30]), we set out to examine a possible role for RsrA in ROS biology. Therefore, we assessed expression of genes associated with resistance to ROS in A. nidulans. This included transcriptional regulators napA and atfA (conserved bZIP oxidative response elements in eukaryotes, [24, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35]) and members of the CCAAT-binding factor AnCF (hapB, hapE and hapC, [32]) as well as components of the thioredoxin system (trxA, trxR and prxA, [36]), the glutathione system (glrA, gstA and gpxA, [37, 38]), and two representative detoxification enzymes catB (mycelial catalase, [39]) and sodA (superoxide dismutase, [40]).

As shown in Figure 6, many of these genes were highly up-regulated when ΔrsrA was exposed to hydrogen peroxide. napA was several fold up-regulated as were several NapA target genes in thioredoxin and gluthathione metabolism (with the exception of gstA which was downregulated) but not NapA targets catB and sodA. atfA was also up-regulated although transcripts of sakA encoding the AtfA MAPK interacting partner appeared not to be affected by RsrA loss [33]. Of the AnCF subunits, only hapC was upregulated in ΔrsrA.
Figure 6

Gene expression analysis of A. nidulans strains, WT (RDIT9.32) and ΔrsrA (RJW263.2) grown on 20 mL liquid GMM at 37°C , 225 rpm for 18 h and additional 30 min culture after adding 5 mM H 2 O 2 in duplicate. Ethidium bromide-stained rRNA and gpdA expression are indicated for loading.

RsrA coordinates ROS response through NapA

The transcriptional data suggested a possible role for NapA or AtfA in mediation of the RsrA ROS affects. To elucidate such a possibility, we next made double mutants of ΔnapA and ΔatfA with ΔrsrA and assessed the double mutants to their respective controls for growth on hydrogen peroxide and tBOOH (Figure 7). The double mutant ΔatfAΔrsrA but not ΔnapAΔrsrA demonstrated an enhanced resistance to both oxidative stressors, thus indicative of NapA as the primary conduit of RsrA integration to ROS regulation.
Figure 7

Growth phenotypes in response to H 2 O 2 of A. nidulans wild-type strain and indicated mutants. Strains were point-inoculated on GMM with or without indicated concentrations of H2O2 and tBOOH and incubated in the dark at 37°C for 48 h.


Whole-genome sequencing is now a feasible method to identify mutations associated with a desired phenotype [21, 22, 24, 41, 42]. In Aspergillus spp. and other fungi, single gene mutations have been typically identified through meiotic mapping and/or complementation with DNA libraries [43]. This is an arduous procedure requiring a significant amount of time and effort that does not always meet with success. Given the relatively small genome size of model fungi coupled with the decreasing costs of DNA sequencing, we thought it feasible to utilize Illumina whole genome sequence to identify an A. nidulans mutation, obviating the need for prior characterization of informative markers. We utilized the sequenced strain of this species, employing a chemical mutagen to generate the mutation of interest, which we then backcrossed to reduce the number of SNPs to investigate. This approach was successful, identifying a small and tractable number of candidate mutations to test, revealing RsrA as a conserved protein regulating the oxidative stress response and reproductive development in Aspergilli.

RsrA encodes a putative C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor. C2H2 proteins are conserved in eukaryotes, falling into an estimated 37 gene families [44]. A. nidulans contains 60 such proteins in its genome [45]. The two primary phenotypes of rsrA loss, decrease in sporulation and enhanced resistance to oxidative stress, were conserved in the three species examined. Deletions in all species resulted in significant decrease in asexual spores as well as sexual structures/spores in A. nidulans and A. flavus (Figures 3 and 4). Considering the many studies linking sporulation and ROS [4, 7, 46, 47], these aberrancies in development may be genetically linked with the altered oxidative stress response in the ΔrsrA background.

The oxidative stress response in fungi has been the topic of many studies due to the importance of this pathway in several aspects of fungal biology. Maintaining a mechanism to detoxify ROS is critical for all forms of aerobic life and ROS are mediators of cell signaling processes governing differentiation processes. Hence studies have been directed at understanding the processes regulating this response in fungi including Aspergillus. Here we sought to place RsrA in the context of known ROS pathways. Transcriptional regulation of the oxidative response pathway is mediated by two well-known bZIP proteins, NapA (called Yap1 in other filamentous fungi) and AtfA, and the CCAAT binding complex AnCF. RsrA acts as a repressor of both bZIP genes and one subunit of the AnCF complex during hydrogen peroxide treatment (Figure 6). However, considering that hapB and hapE transcripts were not affected in ΔrsrA and that HapC would be oxidized by H2O2 and thus inactive, AnCF is unlikely a mediator of RsrA regulation of the oxidative stress response.

Of the two bZIP proteins, our accumulative data suggests NapA and not AtfA to be the prime conduit of RsrA signaling (illustrated as a model in Figure 8). NapA is directly activated by oxidation through ROS, allowing it to enter the nucleus and exert its role as a positive transcription factor. Previous studies in Aspergillus spp. have supported a role for NapA in positively regulating both non-enzymatic (e.g. glutathione and thioredoxin) and enzymatic pathways (e.g. catalases and superoxide dismutases) important in protection against ROS [30, 31, 32]. Although catB and sodA were not greatly – if at all – affected by rsrA loss, all members of the thioredoxin and gluthathione metabolism, excluding gstA, were highly upregulated during H2O2 treatment of ΔrsrA. GlrA (glutathione reductase) and GpxA (glutathione peroxidase) are key components of the glutathione/glutathione disulfide (GSS/GSSH) cycle in fungi [38, 48] whereas GstA (glutathione transferase) transfers GSH to xenobiotic substrates for detoxification [37, 49]. Thus the differential response of these three genes may implicate RsrA in balancing the GSS/GSSH ratios, at least during ROS stress. Assessment of ROS sensitivity of the double mutants support a major role for NapA in regulating ROS detoxification mechanism (Figure 7) and clearly place RsrA in epistatic relationship with NapA. By induction of genes involved in ROS detoxification, NapA is the activator of an intrinsic negative feedback loop counteracting oxidative stress and hence its own deactivation by reduction [32].
Figure 8

Model integrating RsrA into the global ROS-responsive network in A. nidulans. Upon hydrogen peroxide exposure, the bZIP transcription factor NapA gets directly oxidized and thereby activates gene expression of enzymes and components (TrxA, CatB) involved in balancing the redox status of the cells. RsrA acts as a repressor of certain NapA-activated target genes, perhaps in balance with the AnCF complex. How RsrA is activated itself remains unclear.

Our collective data suggest that deletion of rsrA results in increased tolerance towards hydrogen peroxide stress, possibly due to increased expression levels of genes involved in GSH and thioredoxin production (Figure 6) as well as increased catalase activity (Figure 5). This increased activation is most likely through NapA (Figures 7 and 8). As an increased arsenal of reducing agents (GSH, thioredoxin and catalases) would result in inactivation of NapA in the wild type [32], RsrA loss somehow leads to an active form of NapA that results in increased target gene expression even when ROS stress is counteracted. Therefore we suggest that RsrA could be a negative transcriptional element in the global regulatory network of oxidative stress response, perhaps in balance with the AnCF complex (Figure 8).


In summary, we have successfully identified the putative C2H2 protein RsrA using state of the art whole genome sequencing methodologies. RsrA is negative regulator of the oxidative response cascade acting primarily through inhibition of NapA and NapA target activities.


Fungal culture

Strains used or created in this study are listed in Table 1. All strains unless otherwise noted were grown on glucose minimal media (GMM) [50], with additional supplements for auxotrophic strains (pyrodoxin, riboflavin, tryptophan, uridine or uracil as needed). All strains are maintained as glycerol stocks at -80°C.
Table 1

Genotypes and sources of strains used or created in this study




A. nidulans


ΔlaeA::metG, ΔstcE::argB, trpC801, wA3, rsrA163, veA1

this study








ΔstcE::argB; argB2; trpC801; biA1; wA3; veA1

this study


pyrG89, ΔstcE::argB, wA3, veA1

this study





ΔlaeA::metG, veA1




this study


ΔveA::argB, pyrG89



trpC801, ΔstcE:;argB, ΔlaeA::metG, wA3, veA1,

this study

RJW207.1, 3

ΔstcE::argB, ΔstcE::argB, wA3, veA1, rsr163 (5th cross progeny)

this study


ΔstcE::argB, ΔstcE::argB, wA3, veA1, rsr163 (6th cross progeny)

this study


ΔlaeA::metG, veA1, rsrA163 (6th cross progeny)

this study


ΔstcE::argB, ΔstcE::argB, wA3, rsr163 (6th cross progeny)

this study


ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG

this study


ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG, ΔlaeA::metG

this study


ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG, pyroA4

this study


ΔveA::argB, ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG

this study





nku70::argB, riboB2, pyrG89, pyroA4, veA1



nku70::argB, ΔrsrA::A. parasiticus pyrG, riboB2, pyrG89, pyroA4, veA1

this study


ΔrsrA::pyrG, rsrA::pyroA

this study


ΔatfA::riboB, pabaA1, riboB2, veA1



ΔnapA::pyroA, ∆nkuA::argB, pyrG89, pyroA4




this study



this study


ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG, ΔatfA::riboB

this study


ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG, ΔnapA::pyroA

this study

A. flavus








ΔrsrA:: A. parasiticus pyrG

this study

A. fumigatus

CEA17 KU80

ΔpyrG, pyrG1, ΔakuB::pyrG, pyrG1


CEA17 KU80 pyrG+

ΔpyrG1, ΔakuB:pyrG



pyrG1, ΔakuB::pyrG, ΔrsrA::pyrG

this study








pyrG1, ΔrsrA::pyrG

this study


pyrG1, A. parasiticus pyrG


4-NQO mutagenesis and backcrossing

500 μL of a conidial suspension (4 × 106 spores/mL) of RJW160.17 was treated with the chemical mutagen, 4-NQO at 20 μM for 30 min at 37°C following described protocols [60]. The spore suspension was centrifuged at 5000 g for 3 min and resuspended in 5% Sodium thiosulfate and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The spores were then centrifuged down as above and resuspended in 1 mL 0.01% Tween-80, this was repeated two more times. This treatment resulted in 70% conidial killing. The mutagenized conidia were resuspended in Tween water to 1×103 spores /mL. 100 μL of this suspension was then spread plated to 1% Oatmeal + tryptophan agar plates [25]. Oatmeal agar was used to allow for the visualization of NOR, the orange precursor to sterigmatocystin.

Approximately 100,000 conidia were screened on Oatmeal + tryptophan agar for restoration of norsolorinic acid production. NOR producers were grid plated onto fresh Oatmeal + tryptophan plates along with a positive control of RJH0126 (NOR +) and negative control of RJW160.15 (NOR -). The development of norsolorinic acid coloring was then monitored for several days. Those mutants that showed NOR coloring over the time course were then re-plated to GMM and incubated in the dark for 5 days. A center core of each mutant was then extracted with chloroform and the presence of NOR examined by TLC. Those that conclusively showed the recovery of NOR on GMM were single spore isolated. We chose one of those mutants, MGG1.124, to cross with RJW2. One trp- progeny producing NOR on oatmeal media was backcrossed again to RJW2 and this procedure continued for 4 more backcrosses. The final progenies, called RJW207.1 and 207.3, were sequenced using Illumina technology.

Illumina sequencing and SNP detection

We aligned Illumina WGS reads to the A. nidulans genome sequence using Burroughs Wheeler Aligner. SNPs were called using two methods: mpileup of Sam tools [61] and UnifiedGenotyper of GATK [62]. The identified candidate SNPs were manually reviewed in the context of the genome-aligned reads, as visualized using GenomeView [63]. The impact of the SNPs on coding gene sequences, such as missense or nonsense mutations, was assessed using a custom PERL script (publically available at To narrow down alleles of candidate SNPs, sixth progenies (RJW207A, RJW207.B and RJW207C) were created by crossing RJW207.1 to RDIT2.1 and the candidate genes’ PCR products were sequenced to obtain AN0273 (rsrA) as the mutated gene.

Creation of rsrA mutants

All of primers used to create the strains below are listed in Additional file 8: Table S1.

Aspergillus nidulans

The rsrA deletion strain (TJW131) was created in strain TNO2A7 by replacing the AN0273 (rsrA) open reading frame with A. parasiticus pyrG using modified double joint PCR [64] consisting of the following: 1 kb DNA fragment upstream of the rsrA start codon (primers 8797F5 and 8797PR5), a 2 kb DNA fragment of A. parasiticus pyrG (primers parapyrGF and parapyrGR) via pJW24 [65], and a 1 kb DNA fragment downstream of the rsrA stop codon (primers 8797PF3 and 8797R3). 30 μL of Sephadex® G-50 purified third round PCR product was used for fungal transformation. Polyethylene glycol based fungal transformation was done essentially as described by [43]. rsrA deletants were confirmed by PCR and Southern blot and one correct transformant, TJW131.1, was used for sexual crosses. TJW131.1 was sexually crossed with RTMH207.13 to obtain the prototroph RJW263.2. The recombinants were confirmed by PCR. Subsequent northern analysis was done using radiolabeled probes for the corresponding transcript (1 kb DNA fragment, primers 0273IF and 0273IR).

A rsrA complementation cassette, pJW159.1 was created by inserting a 4.7 kb PCR product using the primer pair HindrsrAcompF/KpnrsrAcompR and cloning the subsequent product into HindIII/KpnI sites of pJW53. pJW159.1 was used to transform RJW277.13 to complement a deletion of rsrA allele in the pyroA locus. The resulting strain was called TJW150 and confirmed by PCR and Southern blotting (Additional file 3: Figure S3B).

The ΔlaeAΔrsrA double mutant strain was created by crossing TJW131.1 with RJW135.1 to obtain RJW273 and confirmed by PCR. ΔveAΔrsrA double mutant was created by crossing RJW277.13 with RJW113.4 to obtain RJW270.2. HZS189 and TWY7.3 were crossed to generate both the ΔnapA::pyroA (RFYL9.1) and ΔatfA::riboB (RFYL10.1) mutants. ΔrsrAΔnapA (RJW297.2) and ΔrsrAΔatfA (RJW298.10) double mutants were obtained by crossing RJW277.13 to HZS189 and TWY7.3, respectively. RJW Progenies were screened for the WT veA allele by growth on GMM for 3 days at 37°C in complete darkness as described in Mooney and Yager [66]. Primers used to determine the genotype of the progenies are listed in Additional file 8: Table S1.

Aspergillus flavus

The putative A. flavus rsrA ortholog was determined by blasting the A. flavus genome with RsrA. One hit, AFL2G_00759 (BLASTP: 33% identity; e-value =2-18), was identified. AFL2G_00759 was deleted by replacing it with A. parasiticus pyrG in the A. flavus strain 3357.6 using modified double joint PCR. Construction of the AflrsrA deletion consisted of the following: a 1 kb DNA fragment upstream of the AflrsrA start codon (primers frsrA5F and frsrA5R), a 2 kb DNA fragment of A. parasiticus pyrG (primers parapyrGF and parapyrGR) from pJW24 and a 1 kb DNA fragment downstream of the AflrsrA stop codon (primers frsrA3F and frsrA3R). 30 μL of Sephadex® G-50 purified purified third round PCR product was used for fungal transformation. Polyethylene glycol based fungal transformation was performed as for A. nidulans [43]. The deletion mutants (TJW146 series) were confirmed by PCR and Southern blot.

Aspergillus fumigatus

Similar to A. flavus, the putative A. fumigatus rsrA ortholog was determined by blasting the A. fumigatus genome with A. nidulans RsrA. One hit, Afu1g02870 (BLASTP: 43.2% identity; e-value =3-79), was identified. This gene was deleted in two A. fumigatus strains, A. fumigatus CEA17 KU80Δ pyrG- strain [67] and in A. fumigatus Af293.1 [58]. The A. fumigatus deletion cassettes were constructed using a double-joint fusion PCR approach as described above. Briefly, approximately 1 kb fragments flanking the targeted deletion region were amplified by PCR from A. fumigatus strain CEA17 KU80Δ genomic DNA using primer pairs Afu1g02870_KO_5F/_5R and Afu1g02870_KO_3F/_3R. The A. parasiticus pyrG marker gene was amplified from the plasmid pJW24 using the primer pair PWpyrGpromF/PWpyrGtermR. The three fragments were subjected to fusion PCR to generate deletion cassettes. Transformation of A. fumigatus was performed as previously described [68]. Single integration of the transformation construct was confirmed by Southern analysis using P32-labelled probes created by amplification of the respective deletion construct using primer pair Afu1g02870-KO_5F/-3R.

Nucleic acid analysis

DNA extraction, restriction enzyme digestion, gel electrophoresis, blotting, hybridization, and probe preparation were performed by standard methods [69]. RNA extractions were made from mycelia of cultures where 106 spores/mL were grown in 50 mL liquid GMM at 37°C with shaking at 250 rpm for 48 and 60 h. Total RNA was extracted using Isol-RNA Lysis Reagent (5 Prime) according to the manufacturer's instructions with approximately 30 μg of total RNA for RNA blot analysis. DNA and RNA blots were hybridized with rsrA, aflrsrA, fumrsrA, veA, laeA, hapC, atfA, napA, prxA, gpxA, trxA, trxR, catB, glrA, sodA, gstA, and gpdA DNA fragments which were generated by PCR using gene-specific primers as shown in Additional file 8: Table S1.

Sterigmatocystin and norsolorinic acid analysis

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) was used to assess sterigmatocystin and norsolorinic acid production. Those metabolites were extracted from GMM solid medium culture, which was point-inoculated with 103 spores/plate and grown for 5 days at 37°C. One cm cores were punched from the center of point-inoculated plates and homogenized with 3 mL double distilled H2O. Three mL of chloroform were added and samples were centrifuged for 10 min. The organic layer was removed and put into a 3 mL glass vial and left to sit and dry in a fume hood overnight. Dried extracts were resuspended with 100 μL chloroform and 5 or 10 μL were loaded onto a non-UV coated TLC plate. Sterigmatocystin or norsolorinic acid was spotted as a standard. The plates were run in chloroform:acetone (8:2) solvent and stained with 15% aluminum chloride in 95% ethanol. TLC plates were viewed under 254 nm UV light.

Physiological analysis

One thousand conidia from strains were point-inoculated onto solid GMM in four replicates and incubated in continuous dark at 29°C for 7 days and at 37°C for 5 days. Radial growth was assayed by measuring the diameter of point-inoculated colonies after 5 days and 7 days of incubation at 37°C and 29°C, respectively. Per strain, center cores (1 cm diameter) from three independent plates were excised and each core was homogenized in 3 mL H2O containing 0.01% Tween-80 before asexual spores were quantified using a hemocytometer. For assessment of sexual development in A. nidulans, 106 spores/5 mL in GMM containing 7.5 g/L agar were plated on solidified GMM and incubated at 37°C for 5 days in the dark. Per A. nidulans strain, a core (1 cm diameter) from four independent plates were excised and each core was homogenized in 3 mL H2O containing 0.01% Tween-80 before sexual spores were quantified using a hemocytometer. For assessment of asexual spore formation in A. fumigatus and A. flavus, 107 spores/5 mL GMM containing 3.5 g/L agar were plated on solidified GMM and grown for 5 days at 37°C in the dark. Counting of spores was performed in accordance to the method for A. nidulans as described above.

Sclerotia formation was measured for fungal strains following previously described methods [70]. Briefly, 10 mL of 2% sorbitol GMM media with 1.6% agar was overlaid with 3 mL of 2% sorbitol GMM media with 0.75% agar containing 103 spores/plate of each A. flavus strain. Cultures were grown at 29°C under complete darkness for 7 days. To visualize sclerotium formation, plates were sprayed with 70% ethanol. The exposed sclerotia were then collected, lyophilized, and weighed (dry weight per plate). Sclerotial weight was determined by using four replicates.

Stress tests

For stress tests, indicated number of spores of each strain were spotted on solidified GMM containing either indicated concentrations of H2O2, tBOOH, 1 M NaCl, 2 mg/mL Congo red, 50 μM camptothecin, phosphate buffer pH8, or no stressor. The plates were incubated at 29°C and 37°C for 48h or 72 h in the dark, respectively. The hydrogen peroxide diffusion assay was carried out as initially described in Thön et al., 2007 [36]. For gene expression analysis under H2O2 stress, total RNA was extracted from biologically duplicated freeze-dried mycelia of A. nidulans strains grown on 20 mL liquid GMM at 37°C, 225 rpm for 18hr and additional 30min culture after adding 5 mM H2O2 in the GMM liquid media.

Statistical analysis

Statistical differences were analyzed using the GraphPad Prism 5 software package (GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA).

Ethics statement

We did not use human subjects at all.



This work was supported in part by NIH grant PO1GM084077 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences to N.P.K. and in part by National Science Foundation Grant Emerging Frontiers in Research and Innovation 1136903 to N.P.K.

Supplementary material

12864_2014_6708_MOESM1_ESM.pptx (153 kb)
Additional file 1: Figure S1: Thin Layer Chromatography analysis of chloroform extracts for metabolite production by the wild type (WT), ΔlaeA and the 4-NQO generated mutant MGG1.124. Metabolites were extracted from point-inoculated solid cultures grown for 5 days at 37°C in the dark. NOR, Norsolorinic acid. Extracts of MGG1.124 were diluted 1:5 before loading. Extracts from other strains were loaded undiluted. (PPTX 153 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM2_ESM.pptx (467 kb)
Additional file 2: Figure S2: Southern confirmation of rsrA deletion mutant in A. nidulans, A. flavus and A. fumigatus. (A) A. nidulans AN0273: Genomic DNA was digested by NcoI (all correct). #1 for subsequent experiment. WT: 9.3kb, ΔrsrA: 3 and 7kb. (B) A. flavus AFL2G_00759 : Genomic DNA was digested by BglII (#1, 5, 6 correct). #1 for subsequent experiment. WT: 6kb and 3.2kb. ΔrsrA: 9kb (C) A. fumigatus CEA17 AFUB_003250: Genomic DNA was digested with EcoRI (#1, 4, 6 correct). #4 chosen for subsequent experiments. WT: 3.5 kb; ΔrsrA: 2.1, 3.7 and 3.9 kb. (D) A. fumigatus Af293 Afu1g02870: Genomic DNA was digested with HindIII (#2 correct). #2 was chosen for subsequent experiments. WT: 5.5 kb.; ΔrsrA: 1.8, 4.5 and 5 kb. (PPTX 467 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM3_ESM.pptx (1.6 mb)
Additional file 3: Figure S3: Complementation of ΔrsrA mutant with WT rsrA in A. nidulans. (A) Growth phenotype. (B) Southern confirmation ΔrsrA complementation by restriction enzyme digestion with KpnI and HindIII expected to have 4.7 kb WT rsrA band in ΔrsrA background (3.2 and 2.6 kb bands). (C) TLC analysis of WT, ΔrsrA and complemented strain grown on solid GMM under dark at 37°C for 5 days in triplicate. ST, sterigmatocystin standard. Compl = complemented. (D) Radial growth, (E) Asexual spore production; (F) Sexual spore production. Radial growth and spore counts were measured after 5 days of incubation. Means ± standard deviations are indicated for triplicates of each strain. Levels not connected by same letter are significantly different (P < 0.05) according to Tukey’s multiple comparison test. (PPTX 2 MB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM4_ESM.pptx (1.1 mb)
Additional file 4: Figure S4: Growth phenotypes of WT, ΔlaeA, ΔrsrA, ΔrsrΔlaeA, ΔveA, and ΔveAΔrsrA (RDIT9.32, RJW41A, RJW263.2 and RJW273.17, RJW112.2, and RJW113.4, respectively) strains grown on solid GMM under light and dark at 37°C for 5 days. (PPTX 1 MB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM5_ESM.pptx (158 kb)
Additional file 5: Figure S5: Synteny of rsrA in Aspergillus spp. Syntenic analysis of the A. nidulans AN0273 locus region from AspGD ( [71]. (PPTX 158 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM6_ESM.pptx (696 kb)
Additional file 6: Figure S6: Growth phenotypes of WT and ΔrsrA of A. flavus and A. fumigatus. (A) A. flavus grown on GMM at 29°C for 7 days. (B) Sclerotia formation in A. flavus on GMM with 2% sorbitol for 7 days. (C) A. fumigatus grown on GMM at 37°C for 5 days. (PPTX 696 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM7_ESM.pptx (162 kb)
Additional file 7: Figure S7: Growth phenotypes of WT and ΔrsrA of A. nidulans, A. fumigatus and A. flavus grown on GMM supplemented with indicated stressors at 37 and 29°C for 2 and 3 days, respectively. (PPTX 162 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM8_ESM.docx (41 kb)
Additional file 8: Table S1: Oligonucleotides used in this study. (DOCX 41 KB)
12864_2014_6708_MOESM9_ESM.pdf (68 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 1
12864_2014_6708_MOESM10_ESM.pdf (108 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 2
12864_2014_6708_MOESM11_ESM.pdf (51 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 3
12864_2014_6708_MOESM12_ESM.pdf (98 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 4
12864_2014_6708_MOESM13_ESM.pdf (77 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 5
12864_2014_6708_MOESM14_ESM.pdf (65 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 6
12864_2014_6708_MOESM15_ESM.pdf (122 kb)
Authors’ original file for figure 7
12864_2014_6708_MOESM16_ESM.tif (2.5 mb)
Authors’ original file for figure 8


  1. 1.
    Calvo AM, Wilson RA, Bok JW, Keller NP: Relationship between secondary metabolism and fungal development. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002, 66: 447-459. 10.1128/MMBR.66.3.447-459.2002.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hong SY, Roze LV, Wee J, Linz JE: Evidence that a transcription factor regulatory network coordinates oxidative stress response and secondary metabolism in aspergilli. Microbiologyopen. 2013, 2: 144-160. 10.1002/mbo3.63.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Montibus M, Pinson-Gadais L, Richard-Forget F, Barreau C, Ponts N: Coupling of transcriptional response to oxidative stress and secondary metabolism regulation in filamentous fungi. Crit Rev Microbiol. 2013, doi:10.3109/1040841X.2013.829416Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Grintzalis K, Vernardis SI, Klapa MI, Georgiou CD: Role of oxidative stress in Sclerotial differentiation and aflatoxin B1 biosynthesis in Aspergillus flavus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014, 80: 5561-5571. 10.1128/AEM.01282-14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu D, Oide S, Zhang N, Choi MY, Turgeon BG: ChLae1 and ChVel1 regulate T-toxin production, virulence, oxidative stress response, and development of the maize pathogen Cochliobolus heterostrophus. PLoS Pathog. 2012, 8: e1002542-10.1371/journal.ppat.1002542.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hong SY, Roze LV, Linz JE: Oxidative stress-related transcription factors in the regulation of secondary metabolism. Toxins (Basel). 2013, 5: 683-702. 10.3390/toxins5040683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim HJ: Exploitation of reactive oxygen species by fungi: roles in host-fungus interaction and fungal development. J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014, 24: 1455-1463.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bayram O, Krappmann S, Ni M, Bok JW, Helmstaedt K, Valerius O, Braus-Stromeyer S, Kwon NJ, Keller NP, Yu JH, Braus GH: VelB/VeA/LaeA complex coordinates light signal with fungal development and secondary metabolism. Science. 2008, 320: 1504-1506. 10.1126/science.1155888.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Baidya S, Duran RM, Lohmar JM, Harris-Coward PY, Cary JW, Hong S-Y, Roze LV, Linz JE, Calvo AM: VeA is associated with the response to oxidative stress in the aflatoxin producer aspergillus flavus. Eukaryot Cell. 2014, 13: 1095-1103. 10.1128/EC.00099-14.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jain S, Keller NP: Insights to fungal biology through LaeA sleuthing. Fungal Biol Rev. 2013, 27: 51-59. 10.1016/j.fbr.2013.05.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Calvo AM: The VeA regulatory system and its role in morphological and chemical development in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol. 2008, 45: 1053-1061. 10.1016/j.fgb.2008.03.014.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cary JW, Obrian GR, Nielsen DM, Nierman WC, Harris-Coward P, Yu JH, Bhatnagar D, Cleveland TE, Payne GA, Calvo AM: Elucidation of veA-dependent genes associated with aflatoxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus flavus by functional genomics. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007, 76: 1107-1118.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Georgianna DR, Fedorova ND, Burroughs JL, Dolezal AL, Bok JW, Horowitz-Brown S, Woloshuk CP, Yu J, Keller NP, Payne GA: Beyond aflatoxin: four distinct expression patterns and functional roles associated with Aspergillus flavus secondary metabolism gene clusters. Mol Plant Pathol. 2010, 11: 213-226. 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2009.00594.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Perrin RM, Fedorova ND, Bok JW, Cramer RA, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Nierman WC, Keller NP: Transcriptional regulation of chemical diversity in Aspergillus fumigatus by LaeA. PLoS Pathog. 2007, 3: e50-10.1371/journal.ppat.0030050.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kamerewerd J, Zadra I, Kurnsteiner H, Kuck U: PcchiB1, encoding a class V chitinase, is affected by PcVelA and PcLaeA, and is responsible for cell wall integrity in Penicillium chrysogenum. Microbiology. 2011, 157: 3036-3048. 10.1099/mic.0.051896-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karimi Aghcheh R, Druzhinina IS, Kubicek CP: The putative protein methyltransferase LAE1 of Trichoderma atroviride is a key regulator of asexual development and mycoparasitism. PLoS One. 2013, 8: e67144-10.1371/journal.pone.0067144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Seiboth B, Karimi RA, Phatale PA, Linke R, Hartl L, Sauer DG, Smith KM, Baker SE, Freitag M, Kubicek CP: The putative protein methyltransferase LAE1 controls cellulase gene expression in Trichoderma reesei. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 84: 1150-1164. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08083.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yang Q, Chen Y, Ma Z: Involvement of BcVeA and BcVelB in regulating conidiation, pigmentation and virulence in Botrytis cinerea. Fungal Genet Biol. 2012, 50: 63-71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shaaban MI, Bok JW, Lauer C, Keller NP: Suppressor mutagenesis identifies a velvet complex remediator of Aspergillus nidulans secondary metabolism. Eukaryot Cell. 2010, 9: 1816-1824. 10.1128/EC.00189-10.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Soukup AA, Chiang YM, Bok JW, Reyes-Dominguez Y, Oakley BR, Wang CC, Strauss J, Keller NP: Overexpression of the Aspergillus nidulans histone 4 acetyltransferase EsaA increases activation of secondary metabolite production. Mol Microbiol. 2012, 86: 314-330. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2012.08195.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Blumenstiel JP, Noll AC, Griffiths JA, Perera AG, Walton KN, Gilliland WD, Hawley RS, Staehling-Hampton K: Identification of EMS-induced mutations in Drosophila melanogaster by whole-genome sequencing. Genetics. 2009, 182: 25-32. 10.1534/genetics.109.101998.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Doitsidou M, Poole RJ, Sarin S, Bigelow H, Hobert O: C. elegans mutant identification with a one-step whole-genome-sequencing and SNP mapping strategy. PLoS One. 2010, 5: e15435-10.1371/journal.pone.0015435.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nowrousian M, Teichert I, Masloff S, Kuck U: Whole-genome sequencing of Sordaria macrospora mutants identifies developmental genes. G3 (Bbethesda). 2012, 2: 261-270. 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Uchida N, Sakamoto T, Kurata T, Tasaka M: Identification of EMS-induced causal mutations in a non-reference Arabidopsis thaliana accession by whole genome sequencing. Plant Cell Physiol. 2011, 52: 716-722. 10.1093/pcp/pcr029.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Butchko RA, Adams TH, Keller NP: Aspergillus nidulans mutants defective in stc gene cluster regulation. Genetics. 1999, 153: 715-720.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Horn BW, Moore GG, Carbone I: Sexual reproduction in Aspergillus flavus. Mycologia. 2009, 101: 423-429. 10.3852/09-011.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    O’Gorman CM, Fuller HT, Dyer PS: Discovery of a sexual cycle in the opportunistic fungal pathogen Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2009, 457: 471-474. 10.1038/nature07528.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Malavazi I, Savoldi M, Di Mauro SM, Menck CF, Harris SD, Goldman MH, Goldman GH: Transcriptome analysis of Aspergillus nidulans exposed to camptothecin-induced DNA damage. Eukaryot Cell. 2006, 5: 1688-1704. 10.1128/EC.00167-06.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hansberg W, Salas-Lizana R, Dominguez L: Fungal catalases: function, phylogenetic origin and structure. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2012, 525: 170-180. 10.1016/ Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yin W-B, Reinke AW, Szilágyi M, Emri T, Chiang Y-M, Keating AE, Pócsi I, Wang CCC, Keller NP: bZIP transcription factors affecting secondary metabolism, sexual development and stress responses in Aspergillus nidulans. Microbiology. 2013, 159: 77-88. 10.1099/mic.0.063370-0.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Asano Y, Hagiwara D, Yamashino T, Mizuno T: Characterization of the bZip-type transcription factor NapA with reference to oxidative stress response in Aspergillus nidulans. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2007, 71: 1800-1803. 10.1271/bbb.70133.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Thon M, Al Abdallah Q, Hortschansky P, Scharf DH, Eisendle M, Haas H, Brakhage AA: The CCAAT-binding complex coordinates the oxidative stress response in eukaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010, 38: 1098-1113. 10.1093/nar/gkp1091.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lara-Rojas F, Sanchez O, Kawasaki L, Aguirre J: Aspergillus nidulans transcription factor AtfA interacts with the MAPK SakA to regulate general stress responses, development and spore functions. Mol Microbiol. 2011, 80: 436-454. 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2011.07581.x.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kato M: An overview of the CCAAT-box binding factor in filamentous fungi: assembly, nuclear translocation, and transcriptional enhancement. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005, 69: 663-672. 10.1271/bbb.69.663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lessing F, Kniemeyer O, Wozniok I, Loeffler J, Kurzai O, Haertl A, Brakhage AA: The Aspergillus fumigatus transcriptional regulator AfYap1 represents the major regulator for defense against reactive oxygen intermediates but is dispensable for pathogenicity in an intranasal mouse infection model. Eukaryot Cell. 2007, 6: 2290-2302. 10.1128/EC.00267-07.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thön M, Al-Abdallah Q, Hortschansky P, Brakhage AA: The thioredoxin system of the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans: impact on development and oxidative stress response. J Biol Chem. 2007, 282: 27259-27269. 10.1074/jbc.M704298200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Burns C, Geraghty R, Neville C, Murphy A, Kavanagh K, Doyle S: Identification, cloning, and functional expression of three glutathione transferase genes from Aspergillus fumigatus. Fungal Genet Biol. 2005, 42: 319-327. 10.1016/j.fgb.2005.01.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sato I, Shimizu M, Hoshino T, Takaya N: The glutathione system of Aspergillus nidulans involves a fungus-specific glutathione S-transferase. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 8042-8053. 10.1074/jbc.M807771200.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kawasaki L, Wysong D, Diamond R, Aguirre J: Two divergent catalase genes are differentially regulated during Aspergillus nidulans development and oxidative stress. J Bacteriol. 1997, 179: 3284-3292.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Oberegger H, Zadra I, Schoeser M, Haas H: Iron starvation leads to increased expression of Cu/Zn-superoxide dismutase in Aspergillus. FEBS Lett. 2000, 485: 113-116. 10.1016/S0014-5793(00)02206-7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, McKenna A, Fennell TJ, Kernytsky AM, Sivachenko AY, Cibulskis K, Gabriel SB, Altshuler D, Daly MJ: A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using next-generation DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 2011, 43: 491-498. 10.1038/ng.806.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zuryn S, Le Gras S, Jamet K, Jarriault S: A strategy for direct mapping and identification of mutations by whole-genome sequencing. Genetics. 2010, 186: 427-430. 10.1534/genetics.110.119230.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Bok JW, Keller NP: LaeA, a regulator of secondary metabolism in Aspergillus spp. Eukaryot Cell. 2004, 3: 527-535. 10.1128/EC.3.2.527-535.2004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Seetharam A, Stuart GW: A study on the distribution of 37 well conserved families of C2H2 zinc finger genes in eukaryotes. BMC Genomics. 2013, 14: 420-10.1186/1471-2164-14-420.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Nierman WC, Pain A, Anderson MJ, Wortman JR, Kim HS, Arroyo J, Berriman M, Abe K, Archer DB, Bermejo C, Bennett J, Bowyer P, Chen D, Collins M, Coulsen R, Davies R, Dyer PS, Farman M, Fedorova N, Fedorova N, Feldblyum TV, Fischer R, Fosker N, Fraser A, García JL, García MJ, Goble A, Goldman GH, Gomi K, Griffith-Jones S, et al: Genomic sequence of the pathogenic and allergenic filamentous fungus Aspergillus fumigatus. Nature. 2005, 438: 1151-1156. 10.1038/nature04332.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lara-Ortiz T, Riveros-Rosas H, Aguirre J: Reactive oxygen species generated by microbial NADPH oxidase NoxA regulate sexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Microbiol. 2003, 50: 1241-1255. 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03800.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hernandez-Onate MA, Esquivel-Naranjo EU, Mendoza-Mendoza A, Stewart A, Herrera-Estrella AH: An injury-response mechanism conserved across kingdoms determines entry of the fungus Trichoderma atroviride into development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012, 109: 14918-14923. 10.1073/pnas.1209396109.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Sato I, Shimatani K, Fujita K, Abe T, Shimizu M, Fujii T, Hoshino T, Takaya N: Glutathione reductase/glutathione is responsible for cytotoxic elemental sulfur tolerance via polysulfide shuttle in fungi. J Biol Chem. 2011, 286: 20283-20291. 10.1074/jbc.M111.225979.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Atkinson HJ, Babbitt PC: Glutathione transferases are structural and functional outliers in the thioredoxin fold. Biochemistry. 2009, 48: 11108-11116. 10.1021/bi901180v.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Shimizu K, Keller NP: Genetic involvement of a cAMP-dependent protein kinase in a G protein signaling pathway regulating morphological and chemical transitions in Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics. 2001, 157: 591-600.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Tsitsigiannis DI, Kowieski TM, Zarnowski R, Keller NP: Endogenous lipogenic regulators of spore balance in Aspergillus nidulans. Eukaryot Cell. 2004, 3: 1398-1411. 10.1128/EC.3.6.1398-1411.2004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Shaaban M, Palmer JM, El-Naggar WA, El-Sokkary MA, el SE H, Keller NP: Involvement of transposon-like elements in penicillin gene cluster regulation. Fungal Genet Biol. 2010, 47: 423-432. 10.1016/j.fgb.2010.02.006.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hammond TM, Andrewski MD, Roossinck MJ, Keller NP: Aspergillus mycoviruses are targets and suppressors of RNA silencing. Eukaryot Cell. 2008, 7: 350-357. 10.1128/EC.00356-07.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nayak T, Szewczyk E, Oakley CE, Osmani A, Ukil L, Murray SL, Hynes MJ, Osmani SA, Oakley BR: A versatile and efficient gene-targeting system for Aspergillus nidulans. Genetics. 2006, 172: 1557-1566.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Balazs A, Pocsi I, Hamari Z, Leiter E, Emri T, Miskei M, Olah J, Toth V, Hegedus N, Prade RA, Molnár M, Pócsi I: AtfA bZIP-type transcription factor regulates oxidative and osmotic stress responses in Aspergillus nidulans. Mol Genet Genomics. 2010, 283: 289-303. 10.1007/s00438-010-0513-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    He ZM, Price MS, Obrian GR, Georgianna DR, Payne GA: Improved protocols for functional analysis in the pathogenic fungus Aspergillus flavus. BMC Microbiol. 2007, 7: 104-10.1186/1471-2180-7-104.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    da Silva Ferreira ME, Kress MR, Savoldi M, Goldman MH, Hartl A, Heinekamp T, Brakhage AA, Goldman GH: The akuB(KU80) mutant deficient for nonhomologous end joining is a powerful tool for analyzing pathogenicity in Aspergillus fumigatus. Eukaryot Cell. 2006, 5: 207-211. 10.1128/EC.5.1.207-211.2006.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Xue T, Nguyen CK, Romans A, Kontoyiannis DP, May GS: Isogenic auxotrophic mutant strains in the Aspergillus fumigatus genome reference strain AF293. Arch Microbiol. 2004, 182: 346-353. 10.1007/s00203-004-0707-z.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Bok JW, Balajee SA, Marr KA, Andes D, Nielsen KF, Frisvad JC, Keller NP: LaeA, a regulator of morphogenetic fungal virulence factors. Eukaryot Cell. 2005, 4: 1574-1582. 10.1128/EC.4.9.1574-1582.2005.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wieser J, Lee BN, Fondon J, Adams TH: Genetic requirements for initiating asexual development in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Genet. 1994, 27: 62-69. 10.1007/BF00326580.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Li H: A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27: 2987-2993. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr509.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA: The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010, 20: 1297-1303. 10.1101/gr.107524.110.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Abeel T, Van Parys T, Saeys Y, Galagan J, Van de Peer Y: GenomeView: a next-generation genome browser. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40: e12-10.1093/nar/gkr995.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bok JW, Soukup AA, Chadwick E, Chiang YM, Wang CC, Keller NP: VeA and MvlA repression of the cryptic orsellinic acid gene cluster in Aspergillus nidulans involves histone 3 acetylation. Mol Microbiol. 2013, 89: 963-974. 10.1111/mmi.12326.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Calvo AM, Bok J, Brooks W, Keller NP: veA is required for toxin and sclerotial production in Aspergillus parasiticus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004, 70: 4733-4739. 10.1128/AEM.70.8.4733-4739.2004.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Mooney JL, Yager LN: Light is required for conidiation in Aspergillus nidulans. Genes Dev. 1990, 4: 1473-1482. 10.1101/gad.4.9.1473.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    da Silva Ferreira ME, Heinekamp T, Härtl A, Brakhage AA, Semighini CP, Harris SD, Savoldi M, de Gouvêa PF, de Souza Goldman MH, Goldman GH: Functional characterization of the Aspergillus fumigatus calcineurin. Fungal Genet Biol. 2007, 44: 219-230. 10.1016/j.fgb.2006.08.004.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Szewczyk E, Nayak T, Oakley CE, Edgerton H, Xiong Y, Taheri-Talesh N, Osmani SA, Oakley BR: Fusion PCR and gene targeting in Aspergillus nidulans. Nat Protoc. 2006, 1: 3111-3120.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Sambrook J, Russell DW: Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 2001, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory PressGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Amaike S, Keller NP: Distinct roles for VeA and LaeA in development and pathogenesis of Aspergillus flavus. Eukaryot Cell. 2009, 8: 1051-1060. 10.1128/EC.00088-09.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cerqueira GC, Arnaud MB, Inglis DO, Skrzypek MS, Binkley G, Simison M, Miyasato SR, Binkley J, Orvis J, Shah P, Wymore F, Sherlock G, Wortman JR: The Aspergillus Genome Database: multispecies curation and incorporation of RNA-Seq data to improve structural gene annotations. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42 (Database issue): D705-D710.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Bok et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jin Woo Bok
    • 1
  • Philipp Wiemann
    • 1
  • Graeme S Garvey
    • 1
    • 2
  • Fang Yun Lim
    • 1
  • Brian Haas
    • 3
  • Jennifer Wortman
    • 3
  • Nancy P Keller
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Medical Microbiology and ImmunologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadisonUSA
  2. 2.Monsanto Vegetable SeedsWoodlandUSA
  3. 3.Genome Sequencing and Analysis ProgramBroad Institute of MIT and HarvardCambridge MAUSA

Personalised recommendations