Binding of ATP to vascular endothelial growth factor isoform VEGF-A165 is essential for inducing proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells
- 5.2k Downloads
ATP binding is essential for the bioactivity of several growth factors including nerve growth factor, fibroblast growth factor-2 and brain-derived neurotrophic factor. Vascular endothelial growth factor isoform 165 (VEGF-A165) induces the proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells, however a dependence on ATP-binding is currently unknown. The aim of the present study was to determine if ATP binding is essential for the bioactivity of VEGF-A165.
We found evidence that ATP binding toVEGF-A165 induced a conformational change in the secondary structure of the growth factor. This binding appears to be significant at the biological level, as we found evidence that nanomolar levels of ATP (4-8 nm) are required for the VEGF-A165-induced proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. At these levels, purinergic signaling by ATP via P2 receptors can be excluded. Addition of alkaline phosphate to cell culture lowered the ATP concentration in the cell culture medium to 1.8 nM and inhibited cell proliferation.
We propose that proliferation of endothelial cells is induced by a VEGF-A165-ATP complex, rather than VEGF-A165 alone.
KeywordsNerve Growth Factor Human Umbilical Vein Endothelial Cell Heparin Binding Domain HUVEC Proliferation Include Nerve Growth Factor
List of abbreviations
- The abbreviations used are: AP
endothelial cell basal medium
endothelial cell growth medium
heparan sulfate proteoglycan
human umbilical vein endothelial cell
relative light units/second
sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis.
Vascular endothelial growth factor isoform VEGF-A165 is a primarily endothelial cell-specific mitogen that plays a pivotal role in both vasculogenesis and angiogenesis [1, 2]. As a key regulator of neovascularization it promotes embryonic development, wound healing and female reproductive functions [3, 4, 5]. The function of VEGF-A165 is associated with various medical disorders, including tumor growth and metastasis, proliferative retinopathies and inflammatory conditions such as rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis [6, 7, 8, 9].
There are at least eight different splice forms of the VEGF-A gene with VEGF-A121, VEGF-A165 and VEGF-A189 being the most abundantly expressed in humans [10, 11, 12, 13, 14]. All VEGF-A isoforms encode homodimeric proteins that are glycosylated and secreted. Signaling occurs through binding to the VEGF receptor 1 (Flt-1) and 2 (KDR), two structurally related receptor tyrosine kinases [15, 16]. The splice forms of VEGF-A have varying affinity for heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs), depending on the different heparin-binding domains encoded by exons 6 and 7 [17, 18, 19]. The splice variant VEGF-A165 is thought to be most effective mitogen due to moderate heparin affinity encoded by the heparin binding domain of exon-7. This domain also facilitates the binding of VEGF-A165 to neuropilin 1, a co-receptor which itself enhances binding of VEGF-A165 to VEGFR2 [20, 21].
Binding to ATP has been shown to be important for a number of growth factors, including nerve growth factor (NGF), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2) and brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) [22, 23]. For BDNF, at least, this appears to be mediated by covalent binding, based on the results from mass spectrometry of BDNF-ATP complex with electrospray ionization (ESI) techniques. Other growth factor-ATP complexes were not stable under these ionization conditions, however have been detected using a more gentle ionization method, matrix assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALDI).
There is also evidence that the interaction of these factors with ATP is important for their bioactivity. For example, an interaction with ATP was proven to be a prerequisite for the neuroprotective activity of NGF and FGF2 [24, 25]. Additionally, binding to ATP stabilized FGF-2 against proteolytic cleavage and thermal denaturation . Although in many cases the ATP binding site and effect on protein structure is unkown, for NGF and FGF-2 at least, the nucleotide binding is thought to occur at the site of the heparin binding domain [25, 27].
ATP levels are important for the nervous and vascular systems and are known to act synergistically with VEGF-A165 on endothelial cells [28, 29, 30, 31]. In this study, we investigated the hypothesis that the bioactivity of VEGF-A165 is dependent on ATP-binding, using radiolabeling and mass spectrometry techniques. To define its biological relevance, we investigated the influence of the extracellular ATP concentration on VEGF-A165-induced proliferation of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs).
Adenosine-5'-triphosphate (ATP) disodium salt, alkaline phosphatase (AP; from bovine intestinal mucosa), benzamidine hydrochloride, dithiothreitol (DTT), heparin sodium salt (from bovine intestinal mucosa), imadazole, lysozyme (from chicken egg white), PMSF, plasmin (from human plasma) and Triton®-X 100 were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Taufkirchen, Germany). Sodium chloride and urea were from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany), Tween®20 and ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) disodium salt from SERVA (Heidelberg, Germany), Tris-HCl from USB (Cleveland, OH, USA) and guanidine hydrochloride from GERBU (Gaiberg, Germany).
Production and purification of recombinant human VEGF-A165
Heterologous expression of the plasmid pET16b-VEGFA165 in E. coli BL21(DE3) yielded recombinant human VEGF-A165 (186 aa) comprising the N-terminal His-tag sequence, GlyHis10, followed by a Factor Xa cleavage site. Here, the translational product is referred to as VEGF-A165. The expression of the plasmid was performed as described previously . It resulted in the formation of inclusion bodies which represented the primary source of the target protein. They were isolated and solubilized. To that end, frozen cell pellets of E. coli BL21(DE3) pET16b-VEGFA165 were resuspended (Ultraturrax T 25; Jahnke & Kunkel, Staufen, Germany) in lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 5 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl) containing lysozyme (0.1% (w/v)), phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride and benzamidine (1 mM each). Following sonication on ice Triton®-X 100 (2% (w/v)), MgCl2 (1 mM) and DNase I (1 μL/mL) were added for 30 min of incubation at 25°C. Subsequently, inclusion bodies were collected by centrifugation (47.800 × g, 15 min, 4°C) and washed twice with buffer (0.1% (v/v) Tween® 20, 150 mM NaCl) and double-destilled water (ddH2O) prior to solubilisation in 8 M urea, 50 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8) and 20 mM 2-mercapotethanol. VEGF-A165 was purified from this solution by immobilized metal ion chromatography. For that purpose, solubilized inclusion bodies were applied to an Econo-column (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) filled with Ni2+-nitrilotriacetic acid agarose (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), washed and eluted using 250 mM imadazole according to the manufacturer's instructions. For renaturation, pooled fractions of VEGF-A165 were reduced with DTT (20 mM) and dialysed against renaturation buffer (500 mM guanidine hydrochloride, 100 mM Tris-HCl pH 9.0, 2 mM EDTA, cysteine/cystine redox system (5:1 ratio; 5 mM cysteine, 1 mM cystine)). Finally, refolded, dimeric VEGF-A165 was dialyzed against 100 mM sodium acetate buffer (pH 5) and concentrated using Amicon Ultra centrifugal filter devices (10 kDa molecular weight cut-off; Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA).
Labeling of VEGF-A165 with [γ-32P]ATP and [α-32P]ATP
For labeling, 3 μg VEGF-A165 (unless otherwise noted) was incubated with 5 μCi each of [γ-32P]ATP or [α-32P]ATP (Hartmann Analytic, Braunschweig, Germany) and combined with 0.01 mM non-radioactive ATP (optionally containing 0.1 mM MgCl2). Incubation was performed in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5, total volume 15 μL, 37°C, 15 min). For treatment of labeled VEGF-A165 with heparin (1, 10 or 100 μg/mL), sodium chloride (100 mM) or AP (300 ng/15 μL) incubation was continued for additional 15 min upon addition of each compound. Proteins were separated by reducing sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE; 17.5%). Minigels were vacuum-dried. Radiolabeling was detected using a BAS-1800 II reader and BAS-MS 2325 imaging plates (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan) and analyzed with AIDA Image Analyzer software (version 3.21.001, Raytest GmbH, Straubenhardt, Germany).
Plasmin digestion of VEGF-A165 labeled with ATP
2 μg (6 μM) VEGF-A165 was incubated in the presence or absence of 20 μM ATP in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5) at 37°C for 15 min. Subsequently, 300 ng plasmin was added for proteolytic cleavage and incubation was continued for additional 120 min. For comparison with non-digested growth factor, 2 μg VEGF-A165 were treated in the same way except that ATP and plasmin were omitted. Protein fragments were separated by reducing SDS-PAGE (17.5%) and visualized by silver staining .
Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy
Far-UV CD spectra (195-250 nm) were recorded at 100 nm/min using a Jasco-J600 spectropolarimeter and a 0.1 cm sample cell (25°C, 4 accumulations each). Data point resolution and bandwidth were set to 1 nm, sensitivity to 50 mdeg. Samples containing 40 μM VEGF-A165 were pre-incubated with or without a twofold excess of ATP (80 μM) in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5, 37°C, 15 min). Final protein CD spectra were background-corrected with regard to absorption caused by ATP and buffer components. Data were evaluated using J-700 for Windows Standard Analysis software.
For detection of the VEGF-A165-ATP complex, MALDI-TOF MS was performed according to König et al. with slight modifications. VEGF-A165 and its complexes were purified by reversed phase chromatography using C18-ZipTip pipet tips (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). Pipet tips were washed with elution solvent (80% methanol, 0.1% acetic acid) and equilibrated with aqueous solvent (5% methanol, 0.1% acetic acid) before use. For purification, samples containing 27.5 μM VEGF-A165, optionally combined with ATP (30 μM) and MgCl2 (60 μM), were applied, rinsed with aqueous solvent and eluted into 5 μL of elution solvent. Purified samples (0.5 μL) were spotted onto a MALDI-target coated with 0.5 μL of 1% sinapinic acid in acetone. Subsequently, 0.5 μL of 1% sinapinic acid in 40% acetonitrile was added. Spectra were obtained with MALDImicroMX (Waters Corp., Manchester, UK).
Cell proliferation assay
HUVECs (Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) were seeded in 96-well plates at 8 × 104 cells/well containing 100 μL of Endothelial Cell Growth Medium with supplements (EGM; Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany). Seeded HUVECs were cultured under standard conditions (humidified atmosphere, 5% (v/v) CO2, 37°C) for 24 h before EGM was replaced by 100 μL Endothelial Cell Basal Medium (EBM; Promocell, Heidelberg, Germany) containing 0.1% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA). After 1 h of incubation, media were replaced once more by 100 μL EBM containing VEGF-A165 (20 ng/mL) instead of BSA. In addition, AP (Sigma-Aldrich, Taufkirchen, Germany) was applied to selected samples at 40, 80 or 160 ng/mL along with thegrowth factorand incubation was continued for 48 h. Subsequently, cell culture media were taken from separate samples treated in the same manner for measurement of extracellular ATP.
Finally, proliferation of HUVECs was determined using the CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay kit (Promega, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer's instructions. To that end, 20 μL of CellTiter 96® Aqueous One Solution was added to each well to be incubated for additional 3 h. The number of viable cells was directly proportional to the absorbance of a colored formazan product determined colorimetrically (Lambda Scan, MWG Biotech, Ebersberg, Germany) at 490 nm. Values are presented as means ± standard deviation (SD; n = 9).
Luminometric measurement of extracellular ATP
The assay was performed in triplicate.
Data are expressed as means ± SD based on one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Scheffé's test. A probability value (P) of less than 0.01 was considered statistically significant. Figure legends specify statistically significant differences between experimental groups at probability values of p < 0.01 and p < 0.001. Analysis was performed using WinSTAT.
Binding of ATP to VEGF-A165
MALDI-TOF MS of the VEGF-A165-ATP complex
MALDI-TOF MS was performed employing soft conditions as described previously . This approach was suitable for the detection of labile nucleotide-protein complexes. Sample preparations using low-acidic reversed phase chromatography and acid-free matrix assisted in retaining the non-covalent interaction. The measurements were performed using the high-mass detector in order to observe the VEGF-A165 dimer as the bioactive species present in vivo.
ATP induces a conformational change of VEGF-A165
Binding of ATP does not protect VEGF-A165 from plasmin cleavage
Mitogenic activity of VEGF-A165 on HUVECs requires ATP
In previous work it has been demonstrated that growth factors such as NGF, BDNF and FGF-2 bind ATP and form non-covalent nucleotide-protein complexes [22, 23] which are essential for neuroprotective activity in vitro[24, 25]. In the case of FGF-2, binding of ATP also imparts enhanced proteolytic and thermal resistance . In the present study, we detected binding of ATP to VEGF-A165, the predominant growth factor involved in neovascularization. Both radiolabeling (Figure 1) and mass spectrometry (Figure 4) analyses suggested that ATP bound to VEGF-A165 is independent of Mg2+-ions. The VEGF-A165-ATP complex appears to be extremely stable, remaining intact after denaturing SDS-PAGE, solid phase extraction and mass spectrometry techniques. In addition, an increase in ionic strength caused only a minor dissociation of the complex (Figure 2).
The most physiologically important form of ATP is thought to be the ATP/Mg2+-complex, which is the predominant form of the nucleotide in tissue. Although our mass spectrometry analyses provide strong evidence that ATP bound to VEGF-A165 independently of Mg2+-ions, labeling of VEGF-A165 with [γ-32P]ATP could also be observed with 0.1 mM MgCl2 in the reaction buffer (data not shown). This is also true for labeling of the growth factor NGF . Such ATP/Mg2+/growth factor complexes were identified by MALDI-TOF analysis of the growth factors FGF2 and NGF recently . Radiolabeling of NGF with ATP is also possible in buffers containing Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+ or Ni2+, respectively . Taken together, this indicates that VEGF-A165 also forms a complex with ATP at physiological Mg2+-concentrations.
Additionally, the recently discovered stabilization of FGF2 by ATP is also present when using Mg2+-ions . This observed stabilizing effect of ATP on the growth factor is present at Mg2+ concentrations of 0.1 mM. This indicates that under these conditions ATP/Mg2+ binds to FGF2 and that this physiological ATP/cation complex protects FGF2 against degradation, too. The effect of ectonucleases on the VEGF-A165-ATP complex also remains unknown. Our results suggest that the ATP bound to VEGF-A165 was not only completely susceptible to cleavage by alkaline phosphatase (Figure 7), but also moderately susceptible to apyrase (data not shown).
Our results are consistent with the theory that growth factors bind ATP despite the absence of classic ATP binding site. Nevertheless, NGF, FGF-2 and VEGF-A165 contain heparin binding domains, characterized by clusters of basic residues [37, 38, 39], which may interact with the negatively charged phosphate residues of ATP. The removal of these basic residues by site-directed mutagenesis of NGF and FGF-2 has been shown to drastically reduced both ATP binding and neuroprotective activity [25, 27, 40]. Heparin has been shown to suppress the binding of ATP to VEGF-A165 (Figure 3), however does not cause the existing VEGF-A165-ATP complex to dissociate. Nevertheless, the competition between ATP and heparin for binding to VEGF-A165 is likely to effect the interaction with the VEGF receptor or storage in the extracellular matrix.
Our results strongly suggest that ATP binding induces a conformational change in the secondary structure of VEGF-A165. We propose that this conformational change is responsible for the increased bioactivity of the VEGF-165-ATP complex, resulting in improved ligand-receptor interaction (Figure 5). The location at which ATP binds VEGF-A165, as well as the exact nature of the conformational change remains unknown.
Brandner et al. demonstrated that heparan sulfate induced a conformational change in glycosylated VEGF-A165 but not in the non-glycosylated form. In addition, they showed that heparin stabilized both glycosylated and non-glycosylated VEGF-A165 against chaotropic or thermal denaturation without inducing any conformational change. This implies that the competition of ATP and heparin (HSPGs) for binding to the mitogen is of biological relevance. Further studies have to be undertaken in order to define exactly where ATP is bound providing a basis for elucidating putative complex-receptor interactions.
We found no evidence that ATP binding protects VEGF-A165 against plasmin cleavage (Figure 6), as previously suggested for FGF-2 . We therefore propose that the biological activity of the VEGF-A165-ATP complex is due to improved receptor binding, and not due to increased stability of the growth factor. Supporting this theory, VEGF-A165 failed to induce HUVEC proliferation when the ATP concentration in the cell culture media was too low (Figure 8). This result corresponded to the minimal concentration of eATP required for the neuroprotective activity of NGF and FGF-2, which was determined to be approximately 1 nM [24, 25].
In our cell culture experiments, alkaline phosphatase was required to lower the concentration of ATP to levels that affected cell proliferation. It is feasible that high concentrations of alkaline phosphatase had independent effects, and we cannot discount the possibility of minor contamination with proteases. Alkaline phosphatase added without exogeneous VEGF-A165 did not influence HUVEC viability (despite reducing eATP levels to 0.26 nM; Figure 8). Therefore, we believe side effects of alkaline phosphates at these concentrations are unlikely. This is in line with investigations with other growth factors like FGF2  and NGF  that demonstrated similar results when using alkaline phosphatase to lower eATP-concentrations.
A completely different observation was made when using another growth factor, granulocyte colony stimulating factor (GCSF). This factor does not bind ATP and the neuroprotective activity of GCSF is not influenced by degradation of extracellular ATP by alkaline phosphatase (data not shown). This is in contrast to the situation with the ATP-binding growth factors FGF2 and NGF, where an extracellular ATP-concentration above about 1 nM is essential for the neuroprotective activity of these growth factors [24, 25]. However, this is plausible in the context of our hypothesis that ATP-growth factor interaction is essential for the activity of ATP-binding growth factors but not important for non-ATP-binding growth factors like GCSF. It is therefore reasonable to assume that the observed inhibition of HUVEC proliferation by VEGF-A165 was due to the low ATP levels caused by alkaline phosphatase, which prevented the formation of the presumed biologically active VEGF-A165-ATP complex.
It is known that eATP can act synergistically with angiogenic growth factors including VEGF-A165via P2Y receptor signaling . Even in the absence of VEGF-A165, the nucleotide itself is capable of P2Y1/2-VEGFR2 transactivation, inducing endothelial cell proliferation [31, 41]. Given that activation of P2X and P2Y receptors requires eATP in the micromolar range , isolated effects of eATP mediated by purinergic receptor signaling are unlikely to contribute to the experimental results obtained from our model (Figure 8). We have clearly shown that ATP is tightly bound to VEGF-A165 and a critical concentration of ATP above 1.8 nM is required for bioactivity. Based on these results, the VEGF-A165-ATP complex and not VEGF-A165 by itself appears to be the active ligand causing the proliferative effects under cell culture conditions. Both VEGF-A165-ATP complex formation and the putative interaction with its receptor remain to be elucidated in vivo.
For the first time we provided ample evidence that ATP binds to VEGF-A165. Binding of ATP most likely involves basic residues within the heparin binding domain and constitutes a prerequisite for the proliferative activity of VEGF-A165.
We would like to thank Prof. Dr. Hans-Ulrich Humpf (Institut für Lebensmittelchemie, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität, Corrensstrasse 45, 48149 Münster, Germany) for providing the technical equipment used in CD spectroscopy.
We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Open Access Publication Fund of University of Muenster.
- 3.Brown LF, Yeo KT, Berse B, Yeo TK, Senger DR, Dvorak HF, van de Water L: Expression of vascular permeability factor (vascular endothelial growth factor) by epidermal keratinocytes during wound healing. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1992, 176: 1375-1379. 10.1084/jem.176.5.1375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Detmar M, Brown LF, Claffey KP, Yeo KT, Kocher O, Jackman RW, Berse B, Dvorak HF: Overexpression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors in psoriasis. The Journal of experimental medicine. 1994, 180: 1141-1146. 10.1084/jem.180.3.1141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Jingjing L, Xue Y, Agarwal N, Roque RS: Human Muller cells express VEGF183, a novel spliced variant of vascular endothelial growth factor. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science. 1999, 40: 752-759.Google Scholar
- 13.Whittle C, Gillespie K, Harrison R, Mathieson PW, Harper SJ: Heterogeneous vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) isoform mRNA and receptor mRNA expression in human glomeruli, and the identification of VEGF148 mRNA, a novel truncated splice variant. Clin Sci (Lond). 1999, 97: 303-312. 10.1042/CS19990016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Terman BI, Dougher-Vermazen M, Carrion ME, Dimitrov D, Armellino DC, Gospodarowicz D, Bohlen P: Identification of the KDR tyrosine kinase as a receptor for vascular endothelial cell growth factor. Biochemical and biophysical research communications. 1992, 187: 1579-1586. 10.1016/0006-291X(92)90483-2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Cheng SY, Nagane M, Huang HS, Cavenee WK: Intracerebral tumor-associated hemorrhage caused by overexpression of the vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms VEGF121 and VEGF165 but not VEGF189. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1997, 94: 12081-12087. 10.1073/pnas.94.22.12081.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Carmeliet P, Ng YS, Nuyens D, Theilmeier G, Brusselmans K, Cornelissen I, Ehler E, Kakkar VV, Stalmans I, Mattot V: Impaired myocardial angiogenesis and ischemic cardiomyopathy in mice lacking the vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms VEGF164 and VEGF188. Nature medicine. 1999, 5: 495-502. 10.1038/8379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Keyt BA, Berleau LT, Nguyen HV, Chen H, Heinsohn H, Vandlen R, Ferrara N: The carboxyl-terminal domain (111-165) of vascular endothelial growth factor is critical for its mitogenic potency. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1996, 271: 7788-7795. 10.1074/jbc.271.13.7788.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 38.Keck RG, Berleau L, Harris R, Keyt BA: Disulfide structure of the heparin binding domain in vascular endothelial growth factor: characterization of posttranslational modifications in VEGF. Archives of biochemistry and biophysics. 1997, 344: 103-113. 10.1006/abbi.1997.0145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.