Prevention of atelectasis secondary to propofol-based general anesthesia by application of continuous positive airway pressure to children with neuroblastoma undergoing computerized tomography: a quality improvement project
- 62 Downloads
Continuous positive airway pressure
Laryngeal mask airway
Positron emission tomography
Single-photon emission computed tomography
Atelectasis is a well-known complication of general anesthesia (GA) and intravenous propofol sedation [1, 2, 3, 4]. Incidence of anesthesia-induced atelectasis is higher in younger age [4, 5]. In children with neuroblastoma, false uptake of metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) in the lung due to atelectasis has been reported , which can obscure images of pulmonary metastases . However, the incidence and severity of atelectasis in children receiving SPECT/PET/CT has not been delineated. Due to concerns of atelectasis confounding imaging quality in younger children, we implemented a new protocol to reduce atelectasis risk with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP).
A single, blinded pediatric radiologist graded the severity of atelectasis according to previously described scale  and determined whether there was significant atelectasis to confound image quality or not.
Statistics were calculated using Mcnemar’s test due to paired observations from children receiving imaging both pre- and post-protocol implementation.
Nine children underwent both pre- and post-protocol, but demographics of those at different time points of SPECT/PET/CT were very similar. The incidence of significant atelectasis in the “pre-protocol” sedation was 3/9 (33.3%) vs 0/9 patients (0.0%) in the “post-protocol” (p value = 0.04).
Our observations among the nine children who underwent intravenous propofol infusion with and without CPAP at different time points showed a significant reduction in the incidence and severity of atelectasis with CPAP. Our new protocol is unique because we were able to achieve CPAP without the use of an anesthesia ventilator. The results of our study need to be considered in light of its limitations. Due to a small sample size and the retrospective nature of the study, we could not pin-point the role of patient factors. The grading scale was developed by a single radiologist and has not been validated. We encourage larger, randomized studies to elucidate the effect of propofol anesthesia on the imaging quality in the abovementioned patient population, as well as other cost-effective, reproducible methods to reduce the severity of atelectasis in this patient population.
In conclusions, adding CPAP to an intravenous propofol infusion using a Jackson-Rees bag and an air blender can decrease the incidence and severity of atelectasis in children and can be accomplished without an anesthesia machine.
The author gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Drs. Marla Matar MD, Anthony Romo MD, Samuel Yanofsky MD, Sam Saied MD, Andrew Costandi, Emily Chen MD, Karen Flotildes DO, Abhishek Karnwal MD, Neha Patel MD, Carl Lo MD, Jennifer Lau MD, Sang Le MD, Tiffany Frazee MD, Lydia Andras MD, and Elizabeth Bragg MD, Attending Anesthesiologists at Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, CA, USA, for collecting clinical data. The authors also gratefully acknowledge the contribution of Dr Hollie Lai, Pediatric Radiologist at Children’s Hospital of Orange County, CA, USA, for evaluating imaging of CT, Colleen Azen, biostatistician for biostatistics analysis.
SJG and JJH collected the data, performed statistical analysis with biostatistician’s support, and drafted the manuscript. RDM and MN revised the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
This work was supported in part by grants UL1TR001855 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Science (NCATS) of the US National Institutes of Health.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The study was approved by the Children’s Hospital Los Angeles institutional review board (IRB; CHLA-16-00451) and was granted a waiver(s) of informed consent/assent/permission and a waiver of HIPAA authorization.
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.