Advertisement

Women's Midlife Health

, 4:11 | Cite as

Women’s heart health at mid-life: what is the role of psychosocial stress?

  • Andrea L. Stewart
  • Ummul-Kiram Kathawalla
  • Alexandra G. Wolfe
  • Susan A. Everson-Rose
Open Access
Review
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Stress and Midlife

Abstract

Background

Women in mid-life experience unique stressors, including transitions within their family roles, informal caregiving, job stress, and perceived discrimination. The impact of these stressors on cardiovascular health in women during mid-life is of growing interest in both the popular and scientific literature. The objective of this review is to summarize the recent literature on stress and cardiovascular health in mid-life women. We focus on stressors that are relevant to mid-life women, including social stress and discrimination, and long-term risk of CVD events and subclinical CVD measures.

Methods

We systematically reviewed the literature published between January 2012 and April 2018 for studies examining stress in mid-life and either CVD endpoints or subclinical CVD outcomes. Eligible studies included at least one psychosocial stress exposure, a CVD or subclinical CVD outcome, and either included only female participants, reported sex-stratified analyses or tested for a sex*stress interaction.

Results

We identified 37 studies published since 2012 that met our criteria and included women between the ages of 40 and 65, including 3 case-control studies, 15 cross-sectional studies, and 19 prospective cohort studies. Because clinical CVD events typically occur after age 65 in women, only 22 studies were available that evaluated stress and hard CVD events in samples with mid-life women. Results from these studies suggested an increased and significant risk of CVD due to stress. Of the 15 studies that included subclinical CVD outcomes, the majority showed that mid-life women experiencing greater levels of stress had more subclinical CVD, as indicated by carotid intima-media thickness, flow-mediated dilation and arterial stiffness; however, several studies reported null associations.

Conclusions

General life stress, including perceived stress and life events, in mid-life was significantly related to later-life CVD risk and mid-life subclinical CVD in the majority of studies published in the past six years. Job stress was inconsistently related to CVD risk in women, and fewer studies examined characteristics of other social roles, such as marriage, motherhood or caregiving. Perceived discrimination also was associated with CVD events and subclinical CVD in some samples of mid-life women. Further investigation into specific stressors relevant to women in mid-life, including caregiving and marital stress, are needed to understand the full extent to which life stress impacts CVD risk in mid-life women.

Keywords

Cardiovascular disease Discrimination Psychosocial factors Risk factors Stress Subclinical atherosclerosis Women 

Abbreviations

AF

atrial fibrillation

CAC

coronary artery calcification

CHD

coronary heart disease

CVD

cardiovascular disease

FMD

flow-mediated dilation

IMT

intima -media thickness

MASALA

Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America

MESA

Multi-Ethnic Study of Adults

MetS

Metabolic Syndrome

MI

myocardial infarction

REGARDS

Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke

SES

Socio-economic status

SWAN

Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation

WSI

Weekly Stress Inventory

Background

Cardiovascular diseases (CVD), including coronary heart disease (CHD) and cerebrovascular disease, are the leading cause of death in women in the United States and many developing countries [1]. The United States population has experienced declines in heart disease mortality rates [2], but these declines have been observed mostly in older ages, with middle-aged and younger women seeing the least decline since 1990 [3]. Some projections even indicate that the trend for CHD mortality may reverse, with increases projected in middle-aged men and women by 2030 [4]. Additionally, racial disparities persist in CVD mortality and event rates among women, with black women experiencing higher mortality due to CVD, especially at younger ages [5]. Some common risk factors for CVD appear to impact men and women equally (e.g., elevated blood pressure and cholesterol), while others appear to be related to greater CVD risk in women than in men (such as diabetes and smoking) [6]. Studying CVD risk factors separately in men and women is important for understanding whether certain under-studied risk factors are more important in women.

Mid-life, the period of life between ages 40 and 65, may be a crucial time to study CVD and CVD risk in women, as this is a time when women are experiencing both physical and social changes associated with the transition from adulthood to older age and menopause. Recent studies of the menopausal transition show that the changes in lipids and vasomotor symptoms that occur during this period are related to subclinical CVD, a marker for later-life CVD risk [7, 8]. In addition to the physiologic changes that occur during mid-life, psychosocial factors in mid-life may play a role in women’s cardiovascular health, directly through biopsychosocial mechanisms, and by influencing their health behaviors.

Several reviews of the literature have examined psychosocial factors, including stress and life stressors, as predictors of heart disease specifically in women, finding evidence of potential effects of stress and stressful life events on increasing risk [9, 10]. Low and colleagues reviewed research from 1995 to 2009 regarding psychosocial risk and CHD in women and found that stress from relationships and family responsibilities may be more important than job stress alone for women’s cardiovascular health [10]. To our knowledge, no recent review of stress and CVD has focused specifically on women in mid-life. Furthermore, these prior reviews focused on studies of stress and heart disease diagnoses, events or mortality, which mostly occur in women in older age groups. In a review of prospective studies of chronic stressors and development of CHD published through 2011 [11], Steptoe and Kivimaki concluded that long-term stress relates to an approximately 50% excess risk of developing CHD. They also noted the feasibility of using non-invasive measures of subclinical CVD, such as carotid artery intima media thickness, in population studies to better understand the influence of stress on the atherosclerotic process, while acknowledging mixed results in that literature to-date. Their review did not address sex differences in effects of stress on the development of CVD over time.

Understanding the effect of psychosocial stress on subclinical CVD and clinical conditions known to increase the risk of CVD in mid-life can provide insight into pathways by which mid-life stressors impact later-life risk of heart disease and stroke. Identifying which stress exposures are most relevant to women’s health in mid-life also is important. Work-related stress has been extensively studied as a possible risk factor for CVD. High levels of job strain/work stress are related to poor cardiovascular health in women and men, but results of studies are mixed, and sex-specific effects of job stress on CVD health are unclear [12, 13, 14, 15]. Notably, however, prior reviews of stress and CVD in women emphasized the need to examine the effects of stress from the other social roles that women occupy, such as relationships, parenting and caregiving for adult relatives, as well as the combinations of multiple roles [10]. There also has been recent interest in perceived discrimination as a unique stressor that may contribute to the excess CVD risk observed in ethnic minorities [16]. Women in mid-life can experience multiple forms of discrimination, including racism, sexism, and the beginning effects of ageism. In the Health and Retirement Study of adults over age 50, respondents aged 50–59 who completed the Everyday Discrimination Scale reported more experiences of unfair treatment than older age groups, and over 20% of respondents in this age group attributed their discrimination to age, or age and another attribution [17]. A 2014 review by Lewis and colleagues identified 34 studies of discrimination and CVD risk and risk factors between 2011 and 2013 but did not focus on women specifically. They concluded that there is a possible link between perceived discrimination and CVD risk, but that large, prospective, epidemiological studies with clinical endpoints are needed [16].

The main objectives of this review are: (1) to summarize the recent scientific literature since 2012 on the influence of stress in areas relevant to women in the transitional period of mid-life on cardiovascular health of women between the ages of 40 and 65; and (2) identify critical areas for future research that will promote greater understanding about heart health in women in their transitional middle years.

Methods

We searched PubMed and PsychINFO databases for studies that were published between January 2012 and April 2018 that contained one of the terms “cardiovascular disease,” “heart disease,” “subclinical cardiovascular disease,” “heart failure,” “heart attack,” “myocardial infarction,” “stroke,” “atherosclerosis,” “intima media thickness” (and alternate spellings, i.e., “intimal medial thickness,” “intima media thickening,” “intimal medial thickening,”), “coronary artery calcification” (also “coronary artery calcium”), “aortic calcification,” “pulse wave velocity,” “endothelial function,” “plaque,” or “arrhythmia” and one of the terms “perceived stress,” “chronic stress”, “psychosocial stress,” “job stress,” “occupational stress,” “caregiver stress,” “marital stress,” “relationship stress,” “perceived discrimination,” “life events,” “psychosocial function,” or “psychosocial strain.” We used MeSH terms or Headings tools in PubMed and PsychINFO to restrict to peer-reviewed studies that were conducted in humans, written in English, and had female and middle-aged participants.

CVD events in mid-life women are rare, and few studies of exclusively mid-life women have enough statistical power to detect a significant difference in event risk. Furthermore, there is interest in understanding the physiologic pathways through which stress and psychosocial factors impact cardiovascular health in mid-life women prior to the development of clinical disease. Thus, we included studies of subclinical CVD outcomes, including carotid intima media thickness (cIMT), plaques, coronary artery calcification (CAC), endothelial function and arterial stiffness which are established indicators of CVD risk that can be studied in mid-life populations who experience few events.

Our database searches returned 739 results, of which 59 were duplicates; 9 additional studies were identified by searching the references of these articles, for a total of 689 unique articles. The titles and abstracts were reviewed to determine if the studies met our review criteria: 1) the study sample included women in mid-life (i.e., between ages 40 and 65); 2) the study included a measure of at least one of our psychosocial stress factors of interest as an exposure; 3) the study outcomes included a measure of CVD or CVD risk. Title and abstract review eliminated 487 articles; we then reviewed the full text of the remaining 202 articles to determine if: 1) the psychosocial stress exposure or stressors occurred in mid-life, 2) the main outcome of the study was a CVD event or subclinical CVD, 3) the study sample included participants within the 40 to 65-year-old age range, and 4) one of the following was true: a) the population was exclusively female; b) analyses were stratified by sex; or c) an interaction of the stress exposure with sex was tested (using a cross product term in models). If a significant interaction between stress and sex was found in a study, we reported the results for the subsequent stratified analyses for women. The results reported were the main results from fully-adjusted models in each study. Because few studies were done in exclusively mid-life populations, we included studies whose population included women in mid-life (40–65) and for which the reported mean or median age was in that range, or that conducted age-stratified analyses with a mid-life age range as one of the stratum. This resulted in a total of 37 studies for inclusion in the review (see Fig. 1 for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) diagram) [18]). A summary of the articles included in our review can be found in Tables 1 and 2.
Fig. 1

PRISMA flow diagram for studies included in review of stress and cardiovascular disease in mid-life women from January 2012 to April 2018

Table 1

Results of Studies of Stress and Cardiovascular Disease Events in Mid-life Women

Author, Year, Study Name/Brief Description

N (% women)

Age Range

Mean Age (SD or SE)

Stratified by Sex or tested Stress X Sex Interactiona

Study design

Outcome

Stress measure

Results

QAT Rating

Bohley et al., 2016, Population based study of East German adults [40]

3901 (49%)

20–83

Women: 48.8 (12.1)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

CHD (MI, CABG, PCI), and CVD (CHD or stroke) (Self-report)

Stressors related to German Reunification (financial, occupational, personal)

Reunification stress related to greater prevalence of CHD in women only.

Fair

Buyck et al., Whitehall II, 2013 [48]

7925 (31%)

39–63

49.5 (6.1)

Stratified

Prospective

CHD (fatal CHD, MI, angina) (Hospital record/self-report/verified with ECG)

Caregiving status, burden (> 5 vs < 5 h/week), duration

CHD risk did not differ between caregivers and non-caregivers. Caregiving burden and duration also not associated with greater CHD risk.

Fair

Dunlay et al., 2017, Jackson Heart Study [50]

5085 (64%)

21–94

55.3 (12.8)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Incident CHD, stroke or heart failure (Adjudicated)

Everyday Discrimination, Lifetime Discrimination

No association between discrimination and CVD outcomes.

Good

Egido et al., 2012, A case-control study of stress and stroke [41]

450 (50%)

18–65

53.8 (9.3)

Interaction (n.s)

Case-control

Stroke (Hospital record)

Holmes & Rahe Questionnaire of Life Events

Stroke patients had higher odds of stressful life events than neighborhood controls.

Good

Everson-Rose et al., 2014, MESA [34]

6749 (53%)

45–84

62.1 (10.2)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Incident stroke, TIA (Adjudicated)

Chronic Burden Scale

Higher levels of chronic stress burden associated with increased risk of stroke or TIA.

Good

Everson-Rose et al., 2015, MESA [51]

6508 (53%)

45–84

62 (10.2)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Incident CVD events (adjudicated)

Everyday Discrimination, Lifetime discrimination

Lifetime discrimination in ≥2 domains related to greater risk of CVD events. Everyday discrimination not related to CVD events in women.

Good

Gallo et al., 2014, HCHS/SOL SCAS [39]

5313 (62%)

18–74

Not reported, 62% of sample age 45–74

Interaction (n.s.)

Cross-sectional

Prevalent CVD (Self-report)

Chronic Burden Scale, Perceived Stress Scale, Traumatic Stress Screener

Chronic stress, but not PSS or traumatic stress, significantly related to prevalent CHD.

Good

Graff et al., 2017, Danish National Health Survey [38]

114,337 (54%)

25+

Not reported, majority 45–65

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Atrial Fibrillation (Patient register)

Perceived Stress Scale

No significant association between PSS and 4-year AF incidence after adjustment for comorbidities, SES and lifestyle factors.

Good

Guiraud et al., 2013, A case-crossover study of ischemic stroke and stress [42]

247 (42%)

18+

61.3 (15.9)

Interaction (n.s.)

Case-crossover

Stroke (Hospital record)

Interview for Recent Life Events

Stroke patients experienced ≥1 life event more often during first month and week preceding stroke than during control periods.

Fair

Jood et al., 2017, A case-control study of stress and stroke [45]

594 (32%)

30–65

54.4 (7.9)

Stratified

Case-control

Stroke (Hospital record)

Past 12-month job strain, Effort-reward imbalance (ERI), Work conflicts

Job strain, conflict at work, and ERI all higher in stroke cases than community controls.

Fair

Kershaw et al., 2014, Women’s Health Initiative Study [32]

82,000 (100%)

52–72

Women: 62.1 (0.05)

N/A

Prospective

CHD and stroke (Adjudicated)

Life events, Social strain

Life events and social strain related to increased CVD, but not after adjusting for behavioral and biological risk factors.

Good

Kershaw et al., 2015, MESA [33]

6678 (50%)

45–84

62.4 (0.2)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Incident CHD (Adjudicated)

Chronic Burden Scale (Individual stress), Neighborhood-level stress

High tertile individual chronic stress and medium tertile neighborhood chronic stress associated with greater incident CHD.

Good

Kriegbaum et al., 2013, Danish Population Study [47]

42 million (50%)

30–65

Not reported, age range 30–65

Stratified

Prospective

MI (Registry)

Broken partnership

Broken partnerships were associated with increased risk of incident MI in the year of the break-up and in subsequent years. The association varied by age, with MI risk of same-year break-up significant among older women (50–65) but not younger women (30–49).

Good

Lazzarino et al., 2013, Health Survey for England [35]

66,518 (54%)

35+

55.1 (13.8)

Stratified

Prospective

CVD mortality (Vital registration)

Psychological distress

Greater psychological distress associated with risk of CVD death.

Good

Morton et al., 2014, MIDUS [49]

3032 (52%)

25–74

Not reported

Stratified

Prospective

MI (Self-report)

Family strain (demands, criticism, let down, get on nerves)

Family strain in mid-life not related to MI.

Fair

Ogilvie et al., 2016, MESA [36]

6809 (53%)

45–84

62.2 (10.2)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Heart failure (Adjudicated)

Chronic Burden Scale

High baseline chronic stress not related to increased risk of heart failure

Good

O’Neal et al., 2015, REGARDS [37]

25,530 (54%)

Not reported

65 (9.4)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

Atrial Fibrillation (ECG)

Perceived Stress Scale

PSS significantly related to AF, even after adjustment for covariates.

Fair

Padyab et al., 2014, Swedish Intervention Program [43]

74,988 (51%)

40–60

49 (8)

Stratified

Prospective

CVD mortality (Registry)

Karasek job strain model (demand, control)

Job demand, control, and job strain not associated with CVD risk.

Good

Redmond et al., 2013, REGARDS [31]

24,439 (55%)

Not reported

64.1 (9.3)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Incident CHD, Incident fatal CHD (Adjudicated)

Perceived Stress Scale

Participants with a stress score in the highest tertile had a greater risk of incident CHD, in low income group only (<$35,000).

Good

Slopen et al., 2012, Women’s Health Study [46]

22,086 (100%)

Not reported

Women: 57.2 (5.2)

N/A

Prospective

Incident CVD (MI, stroke, CABG, PCI or CVD death) (Adjudicated)

Job strain, Job insecurity

Job strain, but not insecurity, related to incident CVD. Women with “active” jobs (high demand, high control) also had an increased CVD risk.

Good

Svensson et al., 2017, Malmö Diet and Cancer Study [44]

18,559 (62%)

45–73

58.3 (8.0)

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

CAD (MI, CABG, PCI); fatal MI; non-fatal MI; CVD death (Government Registries)

Job strain, non-work stress

Combined work and non-work stress index unrelated to CAD, MI or CVD death.

Good

Udo et al., 2016, NESARC [52]

21,357 (53%)

18+

46.2 (16.4)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

self-reported MI, stroke, arteriosclerosis

Perceived weight discrimination, Stressful life events

Perceived weight discrimination associated with arteriosclerosis and MI in women only.

Poor

aIn this column “n.s.” indicates that an interaction was tested in an analysis and found to be non-significant and results reported are for pooled estimates between men and women. An “s” indicates a significant interaction was found, and results reported are specific to women. For studies that reported sex-stratified analyses, only results for women are reported

Table 2

Results of Studies of Stress and Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in Mid-life Women

Author, Year, Study Name/Brief Description

N (% women)

Age Range

Mean Age

Stratified by Sex or tested Stress X Sex Interaction a

Study design

Outcomes

Stress measure

Results

QAT Rating

Bomhof-Roordink et al., 2015, Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety [58]

650 (65%)

20–66

46.5 (12.1)

Interaction (n.s.)

Cross-sectional

Carotid bifurcation IMT, Plaque presence, Arterial stiffness (Ultrasound/ Radial applanation tonometry)

Job strain, Negative life events

Recent life stress significantly associated with arterial stiffness but not IMT or plaque, even after adjusting for lifestyle factors.

Good

Camelo et al., 2015, ELSA-Brasil [64]

8806 (54%)

35–74

Not reported, 47.4% of sample between ages 45–54

Stratified

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT (Ultrasound)

Job strain

High strain jobs associated with higher IMT, but not independent of life course SES. Passive work (low control, low demand) also associated with IMT in women.

Good

Charles et al., 2014, MESA [62]

1499 (45%)

45–84

56.1 (0.21)

Interaction (n.s.)

Cross-sectional

Flow-mediated dilation (Ultrasound)

Job strain

Job strain, demands, and control not associated with FMD. Occupational category related to FMD in women only.

Good

Flores-Torres et al., 2017, Mexican Teacher’s Cohort [56]

634 (100%)

40+

Women: 48.9 (4.3)

N/A

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT, Plaques (Ultrasound)

Life Stressors Checklist (Physical or Sexual violence)

Exposure to physical violence associated with increased IMT and odds of subclinical carotid atherosclerosis. Longer duration of sexual violence associated with IMT. Violence in adulthood, but not childhood, associated with subclinical CVD.

Fair

Fujishiro et al., 2015, MESA [63]

3109 (52%)

45–84

Women:59.8 (9.4)

Stratified

Prospective

Carotid plaque, IMT progression (Ultrasound)

Job demands, Control, Interpersonal stress

Job strain, interpersonal stress not related to subclinical CVD progression in women.

Good

Gebreab et al., 2012, Jackson Heart Study [53]

3980 (63%)

21–94

Women:55.1 (12.5)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

Carotid plaque (Ultrasound)

Global Perceived Stress Scale, Holmes & Rahe Life Changes, Jones & Brantley Weekly Stress Inventory

Stress unrelated to presence of plaque in carotid arteries.

Fair

Janssen et al., 2012, SWAN [65]

336 (100%)

48–58

Women: 50.8 (2.7)

N/A

Prospective

CAC progression (Electron Beam Computed Tomography)

Multiple Role Questionnaire

Stress not related to CAC. Rewarding roles associated with CAC progression in Black women.

Good

Joseph et al. 2014, AHAB-2 [66]

281 (48%)

30–55

42.0 (7.3)

Interaction (n.s.)

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT (Ultrasound)

Marital interaction quality

More negatively-rated interactions with spouses associated with greater IMT.

Good

Kamarck et al., 2012, Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Study [54]

270 (54%)

50–70

Not available

Interaction (n.s.)

Prospective

Plaque, IMT progression (Ultrasound)

Daily psychological demands

Increased demands in non-hypertensive patients associated with increased plaque, IMT.

Good

Kershaw et al., 2017, MESA [60]

2963 (53%)

45–84

61.8 (13.6)

Interaction (n.s.)

Cross-sectional

Flow-mediated dilation (Ultrasound)

Chronic Burden Scale

Chronic stress significantly related to %FMD, but not after adjusting for risk factors.

Good

Ortega-Montiel et al., 2015, GEA Study [57]

1243 (67%)

30–75

54.2 (9.0)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT (Ultrasound)

Chronic self-perceived stress

Higher stress associated with greater IMT in women only.

Fair

Peterson et al., 2016, SWAN [67]

1056 (100%)

Not reported

Women: 59.48 (2.7)

N/A

Prospective

Carotid IMT, AD (Ultrasound)

Everyday Discrimination Scale

Cumulative unfair treatment associated with IMT in Caucasian but not minority women.

Good

Shah et al., 2016, MASALA] [59]

894 (47%)

40–84

Women: 54.4 (8.7)

Stratified

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT (Ultrasound)

Chronic Burden scale, Everyday Discrimination

Current life stress and life stress over the past six months significantly related to CCA IMT in women only. Everyday discrimination unrelated to IMT in South Asian women.

Good

Thurston et al., 2014, SWAN [55]

1402 (100%)

Not reported

Women: 59.6 (2.7)

N/A

Cross-sectional

Carotid IMT, Plaque (Ultrasound)

Childhood physical/Sexual abuse; Adulthood physical/Sexual abuse

Adulthood abuse was related to greater odds of plaque; no associations with IMT.

Good

Thurston et al., 2018, peri- and post-menopausal women [61]

272 (100%)

40–60

Women: 54 (3.9)

N/A

Cross-sectional

Flow-mediated dilation (Ultrasound)

Brief Trauma Questionnaire, Childhood Trauma Questionnaire

Women with ≥3 trauma exposures in adulthood had worse (lower) FMD; association unchanged after controlling for childhood trauma.

Good

Acronyms: AF atrial fibrillation, AHAB-2 Adult Health and Behavior Project- Phase 2, CABG Coronary artery bypass graft, CAC coronary artery calcification, CHD coronary heart disease, CVD cardiovascular disease, ECG Electrocardiogram, ELSA-Brasil Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health, ERI effort-reward imbalance, FMD flow-mediated dilation, GEA Genetics of Atherosclerosis Disease [Genetica de la Enfermedad Aterosclerosa], HCHS/SOL SCAS Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos Sociocultural Ancillary Study, IMT intimal-media thickness, MASALA Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in America, MESA Multi-Ethnic Study of Adults, MI myocardial infarction, n.s. not significant, PCI percutaneous coronary intervention, QAT Quality Assessment Tool, REGARDS Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke, SES Socio-economic status, SWAN Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation, TIA transient ischemic attack

aIn this column “n.s.” indicates that an interaction was tested in an analysis and found to be non-significant and results reported are for pooled estimates between men and women. An “s” indicates a significant interaction was found, and results reported are specific to women. For studies that reported sex-stratified analyses, only results for women are reported

The 4 co-authors of this review evaluated the 37 studies for quality using the Quality Assessment Tool (QAT) for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies or the QAT for case-control studies, both developed by the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [19, 20]. The QAT utilizes a rating scale of ‘good’, ‘fair’, or ‘poor’ depending on 14 criteria to examine the key concepts of internal validity for each study. An overall rating reflects the potential of bias underlying the methods and presentation of data. Two authors reviewed each study independently. After the initial review, there was full agreement on QAT ratings for 2/3 of the articles; disagreements on the quality of the remaining articles were resolved through discussion of the articles among reviewers until consensus on quality was achieved.

Measures of stress in mid-life

The studies identified using our search strategy and criteria included diverse measures of psychosocial stress in mid-life, with a focus on stressors that were relevant to women during this period. These measures included, but were not limited to, validated questionnaires and scales such as the Chronic Burden Scale [21], Perceived Stress Scale [22], Holmes & Rahe Life Events Scale [23, 24], Everyday and Lifetime Discrimination Scales [25, 26]. We targeted our search for studies of the effects of perceived stress, stressful life events, stress related to work, marriage and relationships, caregiving and family responsibilities, and perceived discrimination on cardiovascular health and disease risk in mid-life women. We recognize that early life stressors are important in examining cardiovascular health due to the chronic nature of CVD; however, the goal was to focus on stressful life events in midlife to specifically examine the unique physical and social changes occurring for women during their transitional middle years and associations of these stress exposures with CVD risk. We acknowledge the importance of considering stressors earlier in life, as they may moderate the mid-life stress-CVD relationship, however, studies primarily examining early life stress were outside the scope of our review.

General stress measures

Significant heterogeneity in measures of stress was observed in our final sample of studies. Studies that used at least one general stress measure included Cohen’s Perceived Stress Scale [22], inventories of stressful life events [23, 24] and the Chronic Burden Scale [21] which assesses the presence and severity of ongoing stress in 5 domains: one’s own health problems, health problems of close others, job or ability to work, relationships, and finances, and various other single- and multiple-item surveys asking about recent and chronic perceived psychological stress. Similarly, there was substantial variability in the studies of job-related stress, with some using the job strain model proposed by Karasek [27], some using the effort-reward imbalance model [28], and others using other scales or questions to assess job-related stress or stressors. Stress due to other social roles (family, marriage and relationships, and caregiving) was also conceptualized using a diverse set of scales and also by using objective stressors (i.e. relationship breakup from administrative records).

Finally, perceived discrimination was predominantly measured using the Everyday Discrimination Scale and the Lifetime Discrimination Scale in the studies found. These scales do not attribute discriminatory experiences to a specific characteristic but ask participants to report the main factors perceived as being the reason for the discrimination they reported [25, 26]. Thus, studies that used these scales either used the overall summary without attribution or restricted to sub-populations who indicated the discrimination was due to a specific trait (for example, in a study of weight discrimination limited to overweight or obese participants). Studies also measured perceived discrimination by the Schedule of Racist Events (SRE) [29] and Jackson Heart Discrimination Instrument [30], which measured everyday and lifetime discrimination, as well as the burden of lifetime discrimination and the effect of skin color. These were used exclusively in African-American populations.

Because various measures of stress were used, for ease of presentation, we have organized our review by outcomes. The first section includes studies of stress and CVD events, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, revascularization, mortality. The second section looks at the effects of stress on subclinical CVD. Within each outcome section, we further organize the presentation of findings by three categories based on the stress exposures: 1) general stress measures, 2) social role-related stressors, and 3) discrimination.

After reviewing all 37 articles using the QAT, 27 articles were rated ‘good’, 9 were rated ‘fair’, and one was rated ‘poor’ (see Tables 1 and 2). Overall, about 2/3 of all articles showed positive associations between stress/stressor and CVD or subclinical CVD.

Cardiovascular disease outcomes: Clinical events

CVD events and general stress measures

Twelve studies with CVD events or diagnoses as outcomes were included in our final sample of papers utilizing general measures of psychosocial stress. Seven studies were longitudinal follow-up studies, three were cross-sectional studies, one was a case-control study and one was a case-crossover study. The majority of these studies (83%) showed a positive relation between general stress exposures and increased CVD risk; of these seven were ‘good’ quality and three were ‘fair’ according to the QAT ratings. Among the studies with null findings, both were rated ‘good’.

Among the longitudinal studies, perceived stress [31], stressful life events [32], social strain [32], chronic neighborhood and individual stressors [33], chronic stress burden [34], and psychological distress [35] were associated with increased risk of CVD onset, events or mortality in cohorts ranging in size from 6105 to 82,107. The only null finding among these studies was by Ogilvie and colleagues, who found no relationship between chronic stress burden and heart failure onset in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [36]. All but one of the longitudinal studies was conducted in cohorts that included men and women. The study focused on women [32] used data from the Women’s Health Initiative, a study of over 82,000 women ages 50 to 79, and demonstrated that social strain and stressful life events were associated with a significantly greater risk of CVD in minimally-adjusted models. These relationships became non-significant after adjusting for traditional CVD risk factors (including alcohol use, smoking, physical activity, diet, waist circumference, diabetes, hypertension and high cholesterol) [32]. None of the studies that included both women and men identified any sex differences in the relation of the stress exposure and CVD events [31, 33, 34, 35, 36]. All but one study assessed stress at a single point in time only; Everson-Rose and colleagues found that using time-varying measures of chronic stress at two time points during follow-up resulted in a slightly larger increased hazard of incident stroke and transient ischemic attack than if baseline stress was used alone [34]. We identified two studies that examined the relationship between perceived stress and the presence or development of atrial fibrillation (AF). Perceived stress (according to the Perceived Stress Scale) was associated with electrocardiogram-confirmed AF in a cross-sectional study in the US [37], but in a Danish longitudinal survey, baseline PSS was not related to long-term risk of AF [38].

In two cross-sectional studies of diverse populations, past stressful life events and chronic stress burden were associated with self-reported diagnoses of heart disease and stroke prevalence. Gallo and colleagues found that chronic stress burden in a major life domain for six months, was associated with prevalent CHD and stroke in a Hispanic population in the United States [39]. In a cohort study of Germans, a greater perceived change in stressors as a result of German reunification (worse financial, occupational and personal situation) was related to greater odds of having a self-reported CVD diagnosis in women [40]. In addition to the two cross-sectional studies, the case-control and case-crossover studies demonstrated greater odds of stressful life events prior to stroke in middle aged populations that included women [41, 42].

Of the 12 papers reviewed that studied CVD events and general stress measures, all 5 of the cross-sectional, case-control, and case-crossover studies showed associations between stress and heart disease, stroke, or CVD, whereas five of seven (71%) longitudinal studies reported positive associations with increased CVD risk or presence/development of AF.

CVD events and social role-related stress and stressors

Stress from jobs, partnership, caregiving, family strain or social relations were examined as predictors of incident CVD events in seven studies, with mixed findings depending on exposure measurement and population. Three of these studies showed a positive relation between social role-related stress/stressors and increased CVD risk, of these two were ‘good’ and one was ‘fair’ according to the QAT ratings. Among the four studies with null findings, two were rated ‘good’ and two ‘fair’. Job strain was unrelated to cardiovascular mortality among employed middle-aged women in two Swedish cohorts [43, 44]. In a Swedish case-control study, stroke cases had higher job strain, effort-reward imbalance and interpersonal conflicts at work than controls [45]. In the American Women’s Health Study, high strain and “active” jobs (high demand and high control), but not job insecurity, were associated with increased 10-year risk of CVD in female health professionals with an average age of 57 at baseline [46].

With regards to family and relationship stress, Kriegbaum and colleagues used population records in Denmark and showed that there was an increased risk of myocardial infarction in the years after a breakup of a partnership (defined as marriage or cohabitation) in middle aged adults, with the risk being highest for women under 40 in the year after the breakup, but for women over 50 the risk was highest in the same year as the breakup [47]. One study found that caregiving status and burden was unrelated to CHD development among middle-aged British civil servants [48]. In MIDUS, a study of mid-life in US adults, family strain, defined by perceived demands, criticism, disappointment, or bother from family members, was unrelated to MI incidence [49]. Overall, both partnership breakups and some type of job strain/stress showed positive associations with CVD [46, 47], however, caregiving and family strain were unrelated.

CVD events and discrimination

The three studies of discrimination and CVD events yielded mixed findings; of these, two were ‘good’ and one was ‘poor’ according to the QAT rating scale. Two studies looked at the effects of both everyday discrimination (unfair treatment in day-to-day life), and lifetime discrimination (unfair treatment in a major domain of life such as a job, school or housing) on risk of CVD events and mortality. Everyday discrimination did not predict incident CHD, stroke or heart failure hospitalizations after adjusting for demographic, clinical, behavioral and socioeconomic variables in 11 years of follow-up in the Jackson Heart Study [50], or in sex-stratified analyses in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) [51]. Lifetime discrimination in the Jackson Heart Study did not predict incident CHD, stroke or heart failure [50], but was related to incident CVD in MESA, and controlling for chronic stress and depressive symptoms reduced, but did not eliminate this association [51]. Similarly, in a cross-sectional study, Udo et al. reported that experiencing lifetime discrimination due to weight was associated with a higher prevalence of self-reported MI, although controlling for stressful life events reduced the magnitude and significance of these relationships [52]. Although CVD events were not related to everyday discrimination [50, 51], they had a higher association with lifetime discrimination [51, 52].

Summary: CVD events and stress

A wide range of studies have been published in the past 6 years examining the effects of perceived stress and stressful life events on CVD events in populations that include mid-life women. Over 3/4 of studies reviewed showed a positive relation between general stress exposures and increased CVD risk.

Stress, distress and stressful life events were related to CVD events in cross-sectional and prospective studies of women in mid-life populations or cohorts that included mid-life women. Two of four studies examining job stress, and one study examining breakup of partnership, an indicator of relationship stress, were predictive of increased risk of myocardial infarction in mid-life women [47]. Only one study examined job stress concurrent with stress from other social roles, using a single question to assess “stress or mental pressure because of problems or demands not related to your work” and found no significant effect of work or non-work stress on CVD [44]. Lifetime experiences of discrimination also predicted CVD in a national multi-ethnic cohort study of racial or ethnic minorities, but not in a study limited to African Americans in Jackson, Mississippi. Null findings in large longitudinal studies of heart failure and atrial fibrillation indicate that these are not likely pathways by which stress impacts health, although more studies are needed in other populations. These studies reflect a diverse set of stress exposures, which makes standardization of effect sizes difficult. Few studies compared the magnitude of the association between stress and CVD to known risk factors such as smoking and physical activity, but the ones that did found the effect size to be comparable.

Subclinical cardiovascular disease

Subclinical CVD and general stress measures

Subclinical CVD outcomes can be used in studies of mid-life populations to assess risk of CVD events and elucidate potential mechanisms by which stress in mid-life leads to clinically-relevant symptoms and events in later life. We identified nine studies of general stress exposures that included various indicators of subclinical CVD as outcomes, including carotid plaque [53, 54, 55, 56], cIMT [54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59], endothelial function [60, 61], and central arterial stiffness [58]. Eight studies were cross-sectional and one study examined the effects of psychosocial demands on progression of subclinical CVD over a period of 6 years. A majority (78%) of these studies showed a positive relation between general stress exposures and increased subclinical CVD risk; among the studies reporting positive associations, five were ‘good’ and two were ‘fair’ according to the QAT ratings. Of the two studies with null findings, one was rated ‘good’ and one was rated ‘fair’.

In the studies reviewed, the most frequently studied subclinical CVD measure was cIMT, which was used in six studies, followed by carotid plaque presence, used in five studies. Most, though not all, of these studies reported positive findings. Negative life events and daily hassles were related to arterial stiffness, assessed by the augmentation index, but were unrelated to cIMT or plaque in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety [58]. In the Jackson Heart Study, a cross-sectional analysis of weekly stressors, past-year global perceived stress and negative life events found no significant associations with carotid plaque presence in women [53]. However, in a Mexican mestizo population, women who reported experiencing chronic stress for more than five years had thicker cIMT than non-chronically stressed women [57]. Chronic stress also was related to cIMT in women in the Mediators of Atherosclerosis in South Asians Living in American (MASALA) [59].

Physical and/or sexual violence were assessed as predictors of carotid IMT and plaques in two studies of middle-aged women [55, 56]. Mexican women who said they had experienced physical violence in adulthood had a greater cIMT and higher odds of carotid plaque [56]. Experiencing sexual violence was not related to subclinical CVD, but among women who reported physical violence, a longer duration of violence exposure was associated with greater cIMT in this sample. Thurston and colleagues reported similar findings in the Study of Women’s Health Across the Nation (SWAN), a longitudinal cohort study of mid-life women in the United States. Experiencing any sexual or physical abuse in adulthood was related to greater odds of carotid plaques but not greater cIMT [55]. Additionally, in the Pittsburgh Healthy Heart Study, participants who reported more psychologically demanding daily tasks had a marginally significantly greater change in carotid IMT and plaques over a period of six years, although this effect was only seen in participants who were not exposed to antihypertensive therapy [54].

Two studies used flow-mediated dilation (FMD), a measure of endothelial dysfunction. In the MESA study, chronic stress was related to lower FMD, indicating worse function [60]. Similarly, in a population of non-smoking, mid-life women, experiencing three or more traumatic events in adulthood (such as a serious accidents, disasters, illness, or injury) was related to lower FMD [61].

In sum, most commonly in the nine studies that examined subclinical CVD, general stress, including stressful life events and chronic stress burden, was positively related to subclinical outcomes, especially cIMT [54, 56, 57, 59] and FMD [60, 61].

Subclinical CVD and social role-related stress and stressors

We found six studies that examined associations of social role-related stress or stressors with subclinical CVD in mid-life women. All were cross-sectional analyses, with assessment of role stress or stressors measured at a single time point, but two used progression of subclinical CVD as outcomes. As with the studies of general stress measures and subclinical CVD, results were mixed, especially for job stress. All six studies were rated ‘good’ on the QAT; three showed a positive relation between social role-related stress and stressors and increased subclinical CVD risk, and three studies reported null findings.

Four studies looked at measures of job stress and subclinical CVD and found limited evidence for an association. Charles et al. found that job strain was unrelated to FMD in employed participants in the MESA cohort [62]. Another analysis of data from the MESA study found no significant relationships between any occupational characteristics (based on participants’ occupation at Exam 1), including control, demand and interpersonal stress and progression of cIMT or plaques over a mean follow-up of 9.4 years after adjusting for CVD risk factors and indicators of socioeconomic position [63], with the exception of physically demanding jobs associated with a 15% increased plaque score among women. In the Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health, higher job control was cross-sectionally associated with lower cIMT in female civil servants, but women in passive jobs (low demand and low control) had significant greater cIMT than women with low strain jobs [64]. Job strain was also associated with higher central arterial stiffness (as measured by the Augmentation Index) but not carotid plaques or IMT in the Netherlands Study of Depression and Anxiety [58].

Regarding role-related stress other than job stress, two studies used ratings of social role quality to predict subclinical CVD. In SWAN the average level of role-related stress from up to four social roles (caregiver, employee, mother and relationship) was not associated with progression of CAC over two years. However, Black (but not white) women who rated their social roles as more rewarding had a reduced risk of having CAC progression greater than 10 Agatston units over two years [65]. In a cohort of 281 middle aged adults, participants with more negative interactions with spouses had greater cIMT than those who had fewer negative interactions, but an overall measure of global marriage quality (the Dyadic Adjustment Scale), measured at a single time point, was not related to cIMT [66].

There was limited evidence that job stress/strain was associated with subclinical CVD [58, 64] in working women, but negative spousal interaction was significantly associated with greater cIMT [66].

Subclinical CVD and discrimination

Two recent studies, which we rated ‘good’ according to the QAT, examined the relation between discrimination and cIMT. In SWAN, a cumulative measure of unfair treatment over time was calculated by averaging scores on the Everyday Discrimination Scale that was administered to participants up to six times over 10 years of follow-up during mid-life. Higher scores on this measure were associated with greater cIMT but among Caucasian women only – not among African American, Chinese, Japanese or Hispanic women [67]. In the MASALA study, discrimination, also measured by the Everyday Discrimination Scale, was not related to cIMT in South Asian women [59].

Summary: Stress and subclinical CVD measures

We identified a sample of mostly cross-sectional studies (13/15) that reported an association between stress or stressors and existing CVD diagnoses or concurrent subclinical CVD measures representing multiple pathologic features, including arterial stiffness, endothelial dysfunction and subclinical atherosclerosis. Overall about 2/3 of studies showed a positive relation between stress and subclinical CVD measures. The results for studies of subclinical CVD and general stress (including traumatic events, chronic burden and daily hassles and demands) were mixed, with most reporting significant associations for at least one stress/subclinical CVD combination [54, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61], and others finding no relationship between general stress and subclinical CVD [53, 55]. General stress was most consistently associated with cIMT and FMD, indicating a potential mechanism through endothelial function and remodeling. Although role-related stress was studied less than general stress, a study of marital interaction quality demonstrated a significant relationship between positive and negative interactions and cIMT. Four studies looked at job stress and found limited evidence that there was a relationship with subclinical CVD. Only two studies looked at discrimination and subclinical CVD, with perceived discrimination predictive of subclinical CVD in a prospective study of middle-aged women, but only among the white women in the study [67]. Only one study included a measure of arterial stiffness,and found that recent life stress was related to stiffer vessels, but not cIMT or plaques [58]. Arterial stiffness is believed to be a consequence of increased blood pressure exerting greater force on vessel walls. Additional longitudinal studies using measures of arterial stiffness as outcomes, such as pulse wave velocity, may shed light on the impact of stress-induced chronically elevated blood pressure on vasculature. Future studies of chronic stressors that use diverse, well-validated measures of subclinical cardiovascular disease will significantly contribute to the understanding of the pathophysiologic effects of stress on vascular disease and atherosclerosis.

Future directions and discussion

Summary of findings

In this review, we summarized the English language epidemiologic literature published since 2012 examining the relationship between stress and CVD in women, with a focus on the mid-life period. About 2/3 of studies showed a positive relationship between general stress exposures and increased CVD risk, of these 18 were ‘good’ and 6 were ‘fair’, and 1 was ‘poor’ according to the QAT ratings. Among the studies with null findings, 9 were rated ‘good’ and all 3 were rated ‘fair’. We targeted stressors that are relevant to the life experiences of mid-life women, including job stress, caregiving, marital quality and discrimination. The articles we reviewed supported the hypothesis that life stress and stressful events that occur in mid-life can impact women’s later-life risk for CVD events. Furthermore, there is evidence that this relationship can be observed during mid-life through measures of subclinical CVD, such as FMD, cIMT and CAC. In particular, physical and sexual violence, marital quality, and discrimination, three measures that are not common exposures in the overall stress-CV literature, showed potential for an impact on CV health for women. Job stress, on the other hand, is a commonly studied stress exposure, and findings related to this exposure were decidedly mixed. Caregiving stress has been discussed as an increasingly important exposure as the population ages, but we found few studies of this exposure in mid-life women have been published since 2012. Few studies identified significant sex differences in the effect of stress on CVD. The ability to find significant differences between men and women is related to the size of the sample population, which may be a limitation in the studies of CVD events which had small numbers of events. Our findings are consistent with prior reviews of the literature that supported the stress-CVD relationship in women [9, 10], and found that this relationship can be observed in populations that include mid-life women, and that subclinical measures of CVD have been observed to be related to stress in mid-life.

Mechanisms of stress and CVD in mid-life

Studies of stress in mid-life women have the potential to provide a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying the relationship between stress and CVD due to the physical and social changes associated with this transition. The hypothesized physiologic pathways by which chronic stress may lead to excess CVD risk include activation of the autonomic nervous system and hypothalamic-pituitary-axis, which leads to elevated inflammation and pre-clinical metabolic dysfunction [68]. These chronic low-level states of inflammation and metabolic dysfunction are proposed to contribute to the development and progression of atherosclerotic plaques and eventual CVD events. This process begins early in the life course, and progress occurs over decades. Cross-sectional studies, or studies that assess stress at a single time point, are limited in their ability to examine the relationship between stress and CVD risk at different stages of the life course. Longitudinal studies with measures of stress, inflammatory biomarkers, metabolic markers and subclinical CVD measures at multiple time points may provide insight into the underlying physiologic pathways through which stress contributes to elevated risk of CVD. The mid-life is an ideal time to study the mechanisms by which stress impacts CVD; although there are fewer events in women in this age group, it is when metabolic abnormalities and blood pressure dysregulation may start to develop. Noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness, two major pathways leading to CVD events, can also be done in this age group to estimate subclinical CVD risk.

Studies of stress and CVD risk conditions, such as the metabolic syndrome, diabetes and high blood pressure, are potential ways to study the stress-CV relationship in mid-life women. These conditions often develop during the mid-life, prior to clinical CVD events and are potential outcomes for epidemiologic studies in mid-life women, who rarely experience clinical events. Longitudinal studies with objective diagnoses and measures of these conditions can help shed light on potential mechanisms by which mid-life stress influences later-life CVD.

Finally, stress can influence participation in healthy or unhealthy behaviors such as smoking and physical activity in mid-life, which can lead to later-life CVD. There are many ways of measuring and quantifying health behaviors in epidemiologic studies, which makes it difficult to compare results across studies. Researchers interested in the relationship between stress and behaviors should consider using established guidelines such as the American Heart Association Life’s Simple 7 [69] as outcomes to facilitate comparison and utilization of results.

Stress is likely related to CVD through multiple pathways, including through CV risk conditions and unhealthy behaviors like smoking, both of which can occur in mid-life. Many of the studies of stress and CVD included in this review accounted for some of these mediators through adjustment as covariates, but not all studies could examine all mediators. Future research should consider whether covariates are confounders or mediators, and carefully interpret their results in this context.

Other psychosocial factors

The primary aim of this review was to examine the effects of stress/stressors experienced by women in mid-life on their cardiovascular health. Other important stress exposures, including in different developmental periods, likely impact CVD risk in women but it was beyond the scope of this review to evaluate the impact of these other stressors. For example, it is recognized that stress experienced during childhood may influence later life CVD risk; moreover, stress experienced in adulthood may be a mediator of the relationship between early stress exposures and later life health outcomes. Two of our reviewed studies are relevant to this latter issue. One tested whether family strain in mid-life mediated the relationship between childhood mistreatment and myocardial infarction but found no support for this hypothesis [49]. Another reviewed study reported that trauma in adulthood was related to endothelial function, after controlling for childhood trauma [61]. In addition, we recognize that stress (including physiologic or behavioral reactions to stress/stressors) can mediate or moderate well-recognized relationships between other psychosocial factors such as negative emotions (depression, anxiety) or socioeconomic position and CVD risk. Indeed, stress and negative emotions may be a critical pathway by which socioeconomic status (SES) impacts health, although the evidence supporting this hypothesis is inconsistent [70]. A systematic evaluation of that literature is outside the purview of our review, but several studies that met our study criteria looked at the effect of socioeconomic status on the role of stress and CVD. In the REGARDS study, greater stress was associated with higher risk of acute CHD in low-income persons only [31]. Stress was hypothesized to be a mediator of the SES-CVD risk relationship in two studies, but there was little evidence of mediation in those studies [53, 64]. Finally, there is ample evidence that positive psychosocial factors, such as optimism, life engagement and psychological well-being, may be protective against the development of CVD [71, 72].

Limitations

We attempted to comprehensively review all of the literature on stress and cardiovascular health and mid-life women over the past six years. Although psychosocial factors as predictors of CVD in women have been reviewed up until 2009 [9, 10], the transitional period in women ages 40–65 has never been exclusively reviewed to our knowledge. Examining stress in mid-life can shed light on the unique mechanisms of this transitional time and its impact on cardiovascular health in women. We used MeSH terms and multiple expressions to capture measures of stress relevant to mid-life women that are commonly used in epidemiologic studies; however, it is possible that we may have missed a group of studies that did not use our specific terms in their papers, including papers that focused on other types of stress exposures.

We included any study that included women in mid-life, which we defined as ages 40 to 65, even if it also included women outside of that age range, or men. There are significantly fewer studies focusing exclusively on mid-life populations of women, although there are several major cohort studies of mid-life women, including SWAN, the Nurses’ Health Studies and the Women’s Health Study which have contributed significantly to the understanding of women’s health in mid-life. Further studies of populations isolated to the specific period of mid-life are needed to better understand the unique exposures and health outcomes that women in mid-life experience. One challenge for these studies is the fact that statistical power often is limited to evaluate hard clinical endpoints since such events are much more common at older ages. Studying subclinical CVD in these populations could help solve this issue, where both stressors and subclinical CVD are measured multiple times throughout follow-up.

We identified few studies of non-job social role-specific stressors in mid-life women, an area that was identified in prior reviews as some potentially important sources of stress for women. The Chronic Burden Scale [21], used in several studies included in this review, contains individual items that ask about ongoing stress in three social roles (job, caregiver and relationship), as well as ongoing financial and personal health stress, but these separate items were rarely examined as separate predictors of CVD risk in mid-life women. Future studies of stress and women in mid-life should consider including validated role-specific assessments of stress, such as the Caregiver Self-Assessment Questionnaire [73]. This can aid in the development of potential interventions to address specific stressors for women in mid-life, such as workplace-based stress reduction programs, caregiver burden reduction interventions or improved support and resources for mothers or women in stressful relationships.

Conclusion

The mid-life is a time of transition for women, which may result in increases in perceived stress and greater stress exposures. Stress related to life events, social relationships, work and discrimination can all contribute to increases in CVD risk in mid-life women, which can be measured objectively using subclinical measures, rather than waiting potentially decades to observe CVD events. A total of 37 studies from the past six years met our review criteria, the majority of which were evaluated to be of good quality; these studies looked at the impact of various stress exposures in mid-life on cardiovascular health in mid-life women. Most studies reported a positive relationship between greater stress in mid-life and cardiovascular health events in later-life. The findings for subclinical CVD outcomes were somewhat mixed, although carotid intima-media thickness, the most commonly-studied subclinical disease indicator, was related to stress in the majority of the studies in which it was assessed. Less consistent findings with other subclinical outcomes could be due to differences in the protocols used to measure subclinical CVD in these populations, the cross-sectional nature of most of the studies, as well as heterogeneity in the measures of stress. Furthermore, we found few studies of exclusively mid-life or female populations, and, while most studies that included men and women did not identify significant sex*stress interactions, some may have lacked power to detect sex differences especially if CVD events were rare. This review highlights the need for well-designed studies that utilize validated tools measuring specific stressors important to women in their transitional middle years, to more fully characterize and understand how stressful experiences in mid-life affect cardiovascular risk in women.

Notes

Funding

Ms. Stewart was supported by a training grant from the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, number 5T32HL083825–10, PI: T. Orchard. Ms. Kathawalla was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program under Grant No. (00039202). Ms. Wolfe and Dr. Everson-Rose were supported by the Program in Health Disparities Research and the Applied Clinical Research Program at the University of Minnesota.

Contents of this manuscript are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, or the National Science Foundation. None of the funders had any input or role in the design of this study, the review, analysis, and interpretation of data or in writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable; data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed to the content of the manuscript, including topic and focus of the review paper, analysis and interpretation of findings; ALS, U-KK, and AW reviewed and synthesized the literature and were major contributors in writing the manuscript; SAE-R supervised the review and manuscript preparation, revised the manuscript for important intellectual content and guarantees the integrity and accuracy of the work. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable; as this is a review of extant literature and no new data were collected, IRB approval was not needed.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamin EJ, Blaha MJ, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, Das SR, Deo R, de Ferranti SD, Floyd J, Fornage M, Gillespie C, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2017 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017;135:e146–603.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mensah GA, Wei GS, Sorlie PD, Fine LJ, Rosenberg Y, Kaufmann PG, Mussolino ME, Hsu LL, Addou E, Engelgau MM, et al. Decline in cardiovascular mortality: possible causes and implications. Circ Res. 2017;120:366–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Wilmot KA, O'Flaherty M, Capewell S, Ford ES, Vaccarino V. Coronary heart disease mortality declines in the United States from 1979 through 2011: evidence for stagnation in young adults, especially women. Circulation. 2015;132:997–1002.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pearson-Stuttard J, Guzman-Castillo M, Penalvo JL, Rehm CD, Afshin A, Danaei G, Kypridemos C, Gaziano T, Mozaffarian D, Capewell S, et al. Modeling future cardiovascular disease mortality in the United States: national trends and racial and ethnic disparities. Circulation. 2016;133:967–78.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smilowitz NR, Maduro GA Jr, Lobach IV, Chen Y, Reynolds HR. Adverse trends in ischemic heart disease mortality among young new Yorkers, particularly young black women. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149015.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149015.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Appelman Y, van Rijn BB, Ten Haaf ME, Boersma E, Peters SA. Sex differences in cardiovascular risk factors and disease prevention. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241:211–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Thurston RC, El Khoudary SR, Tepper PG, Jackson EA, Joffe H, Chen HY, Matthews KA. Trajectories of vasomotor symptoms and carotid intima media thickness in the study of Women's health across the nation. Stroke. 2016;47:12–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Matthews KA, El Khoudary SR, Brooks MM, Derby CA, Harlow SD, Barinas-Mitchell EJ, Thurston RC. Lipid changes around the final menstrual period predict carotid subclinical disease in postmenopausal women. Stroke. 2017;48:70–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brezinka V, Kittel F. Psychosocial factors of coronary heart disease in women: a review. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:1351–65.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Low CA, Thurston RC, Matthews KA. Psychosocial factors in the development of heart disease in women: current research and future directions. Psychosom Med. 2010;72:842–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steptoe A, Kivimaki M. Stress and cardiovascular disease: an update on current knowledge. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:337–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kivimaki M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, Fransson EI, Heikkila K, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, Burr H, Casini A, et al. Job strain as a risk factor for coronary heart disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet (London, England). 2012;380:1491–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Virtanen M, Nyberg ST, Batty GD, Jokela M, Heikkila K, Fransson EI, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, Burr H, et al. Perceived job insecurity as a risk factor for incident coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ (Clinical research ed). 2013;347  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f4746.
  14. 14.
    Fransson EI, Nyberg ST, Heikkila K, Alfredsson L, Bjorner JB, Borritz M, Burr H, Dragano N, Geuskens GA, Goldberg M, et al. Job strain and the risk of stroke: an individual-participant data meta-analysis. Stroke. 2015;46:557–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eaker ED, Sullivan LM, Kelly-Hayes M, D'Agostino RB Sr, Benjamin EJ. Does job strain increase the risk for coronary heart disease or death in men and women? The Framingham offspring study. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159:950–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lewis TT, Williams DR, Tamene M, Clark CR. Self-reported experiences of discrimination and cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2014;8:365.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12170-013-0365-2.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Giasson HL, Queen TL, Larkina M, Smith J. Age group differences in perceived age discrimination: associations with self-perceptions of aging. The Gerontologist. 2017;57(suppl_2):S160–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG for the PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ. 2009;339  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535.
  19. 19.
    National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute. Assessing cardiovascular risk: Systematic evidence review from the Risk Assessment Working Group. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/assessing-cardiovascular-risk. Bethesda, MD; November 2013. Accessed: 4 June 2018.
  20. 20.
    National Heart Lung, and Blood Institute. Study quality assessment tools. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. National Institutes of Health, 2013. Accessed: 14 April 2018.
  21. 21.
    Bromberger JT, Matthews KA. A longitudinal study of the effects of pessimism, trait anxiety, and life stress on depressive symptoms in middle-aged women. Psychol Aging. 1996;11:207–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983;24:385–96.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Brugha TS, Cragg D. The list of threatening experiences: the reliability and validity of a brief life events questionnaire. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1990;82:77–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Holmes TH, Rahe RH. The social readjustment rating scale. J Psychosom Res. 1967;11:213–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Williams DR, Yan Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB. Racial differences in physical and mental health: socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J Health Psychol. 1997;2:335–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Taylor TR, Kamarck TW, Shiffman S. Validation of the Detroit area study discrimination scale in a community sample of older African American adults: the Pittsburgh healthy heart project. Intl J Behav Med. 2004;11:88–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Karasek RA. Job demands, job decision latitude and mental strain: implications for job redesign. Admin Sci Quart. 1979;24:285–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Siegrist J. Adverse health effects of high-effort/low-reward conditions. J Occup Health Psychol. 1996;1:27–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Landrine H, Klonoff EA. The schedule of racist events: a measure of racial discrimination and a study of its negative physical and mental health consequences. J Black Psychol. 1996;22:144–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Sims M, Wyatt SB, Gutierrez ML, Taylor HA, Williams DR. Development and psychometric testing of a multidimensional instrument of perceived discrimination among African Americans in the Jackson heart study. Ethn Dis. 2009;19:56–64.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Redmond N, Richman J, Gamboa CM, Albert MA, Sims M, Durant RW, Glasser SP, Safford MM. Perceived stress is associated with incident coronary heart disease and all-cause mortality in low- but not high-income participants in the Reasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2013;2:e000447.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000447.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kershaw KN, Brenes GA, Charles LE, Coday M, Daviglus ML, Denburg NL, Kroenke CH, Safford MM, Savla T, Tindle HA, et al. Associations of stressful life events and social strain with incident cardiovascular disease in the Women's Health Initiative. J Am Heart Assoc. 2014;3:e000687.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.113.000687.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kershaw KN, Roux AD, Bertoni A, Carnethon MR, Everson-Rose SA, Liu K. Associations of chronic individual-level and neighbourhood-level stressors with incident coronary heart disease: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2015;69(2):136–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Everson-Rose SA, Roetker NS, Lutsey PL, Kershaw KN, Longstreth WT Jr, Sacco RL, Diez Roux AV, Alonso A. Chronic stress, depressive symptoms, anger, hostility, and risk of stroke and transient ischemic attack in the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Stroke. 2014;45:2318–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lazzarino AI, Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Low socioeconomic status and psychological distress as synergistic predictors of mortality from stroke and coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2013;75:311–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ogilvie RP, Everson-Rose SA, Longstreth WT Jr, Rodriguez CJ, Diez-Roux AV, Lutsey PL. Psychosocial factors and risk of incident heart failure: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Heart Fail. 2016;9:e002243.  https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.115.002243.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    O'Neal WT, Qureshi W, Judd SE, Glasser SP, Ghazi L, Pulley L, Howard VJ, Howard G, Soliman EZ. Perceived stress and atrial fibrillation: the REasons for geographic and racial differences in stroke study. Ann Behav Med. 2015;49:802–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Graff S, Prior A, Fenger-Gron M, Christensen B, Glumer C, Larsen FB, Vestergaard M. Does perceived stress increase the risk of atrial fibrillation? A population-based cohort study in Denmark. Am Heart J. 2017;188:26–34.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gallo LC, Roesch SC, Fortmann AL, Carnethon MR, Penedo FJ, Perreira K, Birnbaum-Weitzman O, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Castaneda SF, Talavera GA, et al. Associations of chronic stress burden, perceived stress, and traumatic stress with cardiovascular disease prevalence and risk factors in the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos sociocultural ancillary study. Psychosom Med. 2014;76:468–75.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bohley S, Kluttig A, Werdan K, Nuding S, Greiser KH, Kuss O, Markus MR, Schmidt CO, Volzke H, Krabbe C, et al. Changes of individual perception in psychosocial stressors related to German reunification in 1989/1990 and cardiovascular risk factors and cardiovascular diseases in a population-based study in East Germany. BMJ Open. 2016;6:e008703.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008703.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Egido JA, Castillo O, Roig B, Sanz I, Herrero MR, Garay MT, Garcia AM, Fuentes M, Fernandez C. Is psycho-physical stress a risk factor for stroke? A case-control study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2012;83:1104–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Guiraud V, Touze E, Rouillon F, Godefroy O, Mas JL. Stressful life events as triggers of ischemic stroke: a case-crossover study. Intl J Stroke. 2013;8:300–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Padyab M, Blomstedt Y, Norberg M. No association found between cardiovascular mortality, and job demands and decision latitude: experience from the Vasterbotten intervention Programme in Sweden. Soc Sci Med. 2014;117:58–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Svensson T, Kitlinski M, Engstrom G, Melander O. A genetic risk score for CAD, psychological stress, and their interaction as predictors of CAD, fatal MI, non-fatal MI and cardiovascular death. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176029.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176029.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Jood K, Karlsson N, Medin J, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Wester P, Ekberg K. The psychosocial work environment is associated with risk of stroke at working age. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43:367–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Slopen N, Glynn RJ, Buring JE, Lewis TT, Williams DR, Albert MA. Job strain, job insecurity, and incident cardiovascular disease in the Women's health study: results from a 10-year prospective study. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40512.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0040512.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Kriegbaum M, Christensen U, Andersen PK, Osler M, Lund R. Does the association between broken partnership and first time myocardial infarction vary with time after break-up? Intl J Epidemiol. 2013;42:1811–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Buyck J-F, Ankri J, Dugravot A, Bonnaud S, Nabi H, Kivimaki M, Singh-Manoux A. Informal caregiving and the risk for coronary heart disease: the Whitehall II study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2013;68:1316–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Morton PM, Mustillo SA, Ferraro KF. Does childhood misfortune raise the risk of acute myocardial infarction in adulthood? Soc Sci Med. 2014;104:133–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Dunlay SM, Lippmann SJ, Greiner MA, O'Brien EC, Chamberlain AM, Mentz RJ, Sims M. Perceived discrimination and cardiovascular outcomes in older African Americans: insights from the Jackson Heart Study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2017;92:699–709.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Everson-Rose SA, Lutsey PL, Roetker NS, Lewis TT, Kershaw KN, Alonso A, Diez Roux AV. Perceived discrimination and incident cardiovascular events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Am J Epidemiol. 2015;182:225–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Udo T, Purcell K, Grilo CM. Perceived weight discrimination and chronic medical conditions in adults with overweight and obesity. Intl J Clin Prac. 2016;70:1003–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gebreab SY, Diez-Roux AV, Hickson DA, Boykin S, Sims M, Sarpong DF, Taylor HA, Wyatt SB. The contribution of stress to the social patterning of clinical and subclinical CVD risk factors in African Americans: the Jackson heart study. Soc Sci Med. 2012;75:1697–707.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kamarck TW, Shiffman S, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Muldoon MF, Tepper P. Daily psychological demands are associated with 6-year progression of carotid artery atherosclerosis: the Pittsburgh healthy heart project. Psychosom Med. 2012;74:432–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Thurston RC, Chang Y, Derby CA, Bromberger JT, Harlow SD, Janssen I, Matthews KA. Abuse and subclinical cardiovascular disease among midlife women: the study of Women's health across the nation. Stroke. 2014;45:2246–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Flores-Torres MH, Lynch R, Lopez-Ridaura R, Yunes E, Monge A, Ortiz-Panozo E, Cantu-Brito C, Hauksdottir A, Valdimarsdottir U, Lajous M. Exposure to violence and carotid artery intima-media thickness in Mexican women. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.117.006249.
  57. 57.
    Ortega-Montiel J, Posadas-Romero C, Ocampo-Arcos W, Medina-Urrutia A, Cardoso-Saldana G, Jorge-Galarza E, Posadas-Sanchez R. Self-perceived stress is associated with adiposity and atherosclerosis. The GEA study. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:780.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2112-8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Bomhof-Roordink H, Seldenrijk A, van Hout HP, van Marwijk HW, Diamant M, Penninx BW. Associations between life stress and subclinical cardiovascular disease are partly mediated by depressive and anxiety symptoms. J Psychosom Res. 2015;78:332–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Shah BM, Shah S, Kandula NR, Gadgil MD, Kanaya AM. Psychosocial factors associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in south Asians: the MASALA study. J Immigr Minor Health. 2016;18:1317–27.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kershaw KN, Lane-Cordova AD, Carnethon MR, Tindle HA, Liu K. Chronic stress and endothelial dysfunction: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Am J Hypertens. 2017;30:75–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Thurston RC, Barinas-Mitchell E, von Kanel R, Chang Y, Koenen KC, Matthews KA. Trauma exposure and endothelial function among midlife women. Menopause. 2018;25:368–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Charles LE, Fekedulegn D, Landsbergis P, Burchfiel CM, Baron S, Kaufman JD, Stukovsky KH, Fujishiro K, Foy CG, Andrew ME, et al. Associations of work hours, job strain, and occupation with endothelial function: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56:1153–60.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Fujishiro K, Diez Roux AV, Landsbergis P, Kaufman JD, Korcarz CE, Stein JH. Occupational characteristics and the progression of carotid artery intima-media thickness and plaque over 9 years: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis (MESA). Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:690–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Camelo LV, Giatti L, Chor D, Griep RH, Bensenor IM, Santos IS, Kawachi I, Barreto SM. Associations of life course socioeconomic position and job stress with carotid intima-media thickness. The Brazilian longitudinal study of adult health (ELSA-Brasil). Soc Sci Med. 2015;141:91–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Janssen I, Powell LH, Jasielec MS, Matthews KA, Hollenberg SM, Sutton-Tyrrell K, Everson-Rose SA. Progression of coronary artery calcification in black and white women: do the stresses and rewards of multiple roles matter? Ann Behav Med. 2012;43:39–49.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Joseph NT, Kamarck TW, Muldoon MF, Manuck SB. Daily marital interaction quality and carotid artery intima-medial thickness in healthy middle-aged adults. Psychosom Med. 2014;76:347–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Peterson LM, Matthews KA, Derby CA, Bromberger JT, Thurston RC. The relationship between cumulative unfair treatment and intima media thickness and adventitial diameter: the moderating role of race in the study of Women’s health across the nation. Health Psychol. 2016;35:313–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    McEwen BS. Stress, adaptation, and disease. Allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1998;840:33–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D, Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ, Van Horn L, Greenlund K, Daniels S, Nichol G, Tomaselli GF, et al. Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association's strategic impact goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation. 2010;121:586–613.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Matthews KA, Gallo LC, Taylor SE. Are psychosocial factors mediators of socioeconomic status and health connections? A progress report and blueprint for the future. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2010;1186:146–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Boehm JK, Kubzansky LD. The heart's content: the association between positive psychological well-being and cardiovascular health. Psychol Bull. 2012;138:655–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kubzansky LD, Thurston RC. Emotional vitality and incident coronary heart disease: benefits of healthy psychological functioning. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64:1393–401.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Epstein-Lubow G, Gaudiano B, Hinckley M, Salloway S, Miller IW. Evidence for the validity of the American Medical Association’s caregiver self-assessment questionnaire as a screening measure for depression. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010;58:387–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EpidemiologyUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  3. 3.Department of MedicineUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations