Advertisement

Nano Convergence

, 6:2 | Cite as

Morphological transformation of gold nanoparticles on graphene oxide: effects of capping ligands and surface interactions

  • Hanqing Pan
  • Serena Low
  • Nisala Weerasuriya
  • Bingli Wang
  • Young-Seok ShonEmail author
Open Access
Research
  • 107 Downloads

Abstract

This article presents the influence of capping ligand and surface interaction types on the coarsening or reshaping behavior of surface-immobilized gold nanoparticles with different core size and shape. The morphological transformation of gold nanoparticles and nanorods on graphene oxide upon heating at temperatures ranging from 50 to 200 °C was investigated. The aggregation and coarsening behaviors of spherical nanoparticles on graphene oxide were slightly affected by the core size of nanoparticles (~ 1, 3, and 10 nm). The comparison of two different surface ligands revealed that glutathione ligands provide much better protection than cetyltrimethylammonium bromide ligands against the morphological transformation of nanoparticles. In addition, the evaluation of surface binding interactions indicated that the attachment of nanoparticles and nanorods onto graphene oxide with additional thiol functional groups could improve the immobilization of particles and therefore decelerate coarsening and reshaping of nanoparticle and nanorods.

Keywords

Nanoparticles Nanorods Graphene oxide Stability Morphology Gold 

Abbreviations

AuNP

gold nanoparticles

AuNR

gold nanorods

GO

graphene oxide

CTAB

cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

tGO

thiol-functionalized graphene oxide

TGA

thermogravimetric analysis

gAuNP

glutathione-capped gold nanoparticles

cAuNP

cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-capped gold nanoparticles

cAuNR

cetyltrimethylammonium bromide-capped gold nanorods

EDC

(1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide)

SP

surface plasmon

GS

glutathione

TEM

transmission electron microscopy

SR

alkanethiolate

THF

tetrahydrofuran

1 Introduction

Metal nanoparticles are a class of functional materials with unique physical and chemical properties, which are closely related to their size, shape, composition, and structure [1, 2]. Especially, gold nanoparticles (AuNP) and gold nanorods (AuNR) have gained a lot of attention because of their applications in catalysis, electronics, and sensors [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. They have also exhibited many attractive features such as strong plasmonic activity, facile ligand functionalization, water solubility, and excellent biocompatibility, which have made them good candidates for biomedical applications [6, 7, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17]. Deposition of AuNPs on solid supports has often been necessary for various reasons including enhanced stability and synergistic activity [2, 5, 10, 11, 14]. Therefore, the preparation of nanoparticle hybrids with the appropriate support materials and understanding the influence of supports to nanoparticles are critical to the expansion of practical applications of AuNPs [18, 19].

Since AuNPs anchored on graphene families could exhibit interesting catalytic, electrical and optical activities [2, 5, 8, 10, 11, 20], understanding the nature and extent of morphological transformation of gold nanoparticle-graphene oxide (AuNP-GO) hybrids could maximize their potentials for many practical applications [18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23]. Previous studies from our research group have shown that the presence of GO supports negatively affects the stability of AuNPs and AuNRs causing their core to undergo size and/or shape evolutions more easily [24]. The disruption and stripping of the protecting organic ligands by GO through strong electrostatic interactions were proposed as a main mechanism of nanoparticle destabilization on GO.

The gradual changes in size and shape of nanoparticles, when they are exposed to heat or light irradiation [21, 22, 25, 26, 27], could seriously impede their long-term technological advancements for device and catalysis applications. Therefore, further understanding of various factors determining morphological transformations of nanoparticles is required for developing new strategies for improving their overall stability and performance. In this study, AuNPs with different core sizes are assembled on the surface of GO to study their heat-induced coarsening behavior. AuNPs with different surface capping ligands (glutathione and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)) on GO was also prepared to understand the relationship between the stability of AuNPs and the type of surface ligand-nanoparticle interactions. The chemical interaction or bond formation between GO supports and ligand-capped AuNPs was also controlled by using thiol-functionalized GO (tGO) to see the influence of additional metal-sulfur bond against the morphological transformation of AuNP and AuNR. Various AuNP-GO and AuNR-GO hybrid materials are annealed from 50 to 200 °C to examine the influence of various structural components.

2 Experimentals

Detailed information regarding materials, synthetic procedures, and characterizations (1H NMR, FT-IR, and TGA) for glutathione-capped gold nanoparticles (gAuNP) [28, 29, 30, 31], cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)-capped gold nanoparticles (cAuNP) [9], and CTAB-capped gold nanorods (cAuNR) [9], and instrumental methods used to conduct the research presented in this article are provided in the previous publications and Additional file 1 [15, 24, 29].

2.1 Preparation of thiol-functionalized graphene oxide (tGO)

Thiol-functionalized graphene oxide was made by following the published procedure [22, 30, 32]. First, 5 mL of 0.4 M EDC (1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide), 5 mL of 0.1 M NHS (N-hydroxysuccinimide), and 5 mL 0.1 M l-cysteine were prepared. A 0.5 mL solution of concentrated hydrochloric acid was added to the l-cysteine solution to dissolve the l-cysteine crystals. Solutions of EDC, NHS, and l-cysteine were added to 8 mL of 4 mg/mL graphene oxide suspension in the order mentioned. As soon as the EDC/NHS/l-cysteine solutions were added, graphene oxide begins to separate from solution due to the decrease in polarity of GO with the incorporation of thiol functional groups from l-cysteine. The mixture is left sitting for 10 min, then centrifuged. The supernatant is discarded, and the precipitate was washed with nanopure water and centrifuged to precipitate the tGO. This process was repeated twice. The final product was left to dry in a vacuum overnight. IR spectra of isolated tGO showed the presence of S–H stretching bands at ~ 2565 cm−1.

2.2 Preparation of gold nanoparticle-graphene oxide (AuNP-GO) and nanorod-graphene oxide (AuNR-GO) hybrids

Graphene oxide solution was made by dispersing GO flakes in nanopure water. GO flakes were not readily dispersed in water, hence the mixture was sonicated for 30 min until the GO formed a homogeneous dispersion. The concentration of GO solution was 1 mg/mL. The GO dispersion in water exhibited long-term stability. The gAuNP of size ~ 1, 3, and 10 nm, cAuNP, and cAuNR were bonded to GO as follows: Gold nanorods/nanoparticles were dissolved in water (~ 1 mg/mL) forming homogeneous solutions. The solutions of GO and gold nanorods/nanoparticles were mixed at a 1:1 ratio (v/v: 1 mL GO solution to 1 mL gold nanorod/nanoparticle solution) for 24 h.

To prepare the hybrids of tGO with AuNP and AuNR, the dried tGO was re-dispersed in nanopure water and the aqueous solutions of AuNP and AuNR were added to this solution. The mixture was then stirred at room temperature for 24 h to allow the formation of metal-sulfur bonds, so that the nanoparticles and nanorods can be covalently anchored to graphene oxide. The final hybrid product is then centrifuged, and the supernatant was discarded. The resulting precipitate was stored in a vacuum desiccator for at least 72 h to remove all solvents.

2.3 Heat-treatment of AuNP-GO and AuNR-GO hybrids

The hybrids were heated from 50 to 200 °C, at 50 °C increments using a Barnstead Thermolyne 1300 Furnace. Each sample was heated for 1 h in a glass vial in air. Solvents were removed to dryness before the particle samples were heated in powder form.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Gold nanoparticles with different sizes and stabilizing ligands

UV–vis spectra of gAuNP with different core sizes are shown in Fig. 1a, which confirmed the optical properties of gold nanoparticles corresponding to their expected sizes. The UV–vis spectrum of gAuNP10nm exhibits strong surface plasmon (SP) bands at ~ 520 nm, while that of gAuNP3nm show less prominent SP bands at the similar wavelength [29]. The UV–vis spectrum of small and monodispersed gAuNP1nm does not possess plasmon bands, but have three absorption bands at 680, 450, and 410 nm, which are in a good agreement with previous reports published on the characteristics of Au25(GS)18 [30, 31]. Both cAuNP3nm and cAuNR were prepared following a published method by Castellana et al. [9]. The UV–vis spectrum of cAuNP3nm showing small SP bands at ~ 520 nm is quite similar to that of gAuNP3nm (Fig. 1b). The characteristic plasmon bands at 520 nm (transverse) and 780 nm (longitudinal) shown in the UV–vis spectrum of cAuNR confirmed the successful preparation of monodisperse gold nanorods.
Fig. 1

UV-vis spectra of a gAuNP with core sizes of ~ 1, 3, and 10 nm and b cAuNP and cAuNR

TEM images and their respective histograms showing size distribution of gAuNP are shown in Fig. 2. TEM images of both gAuNP10nm and gAuNP3nm (Fig. 2a, b), respectively) show that the nanoparticles are monodispersed and not aggregated. Histograms show that the majority of gAuNP3nm are indeed populated around ~ 3 nm and the gAuNP10nm have an average size of ~ 11.5 nm. TEM image (Fig. 2c) of the small and monodispersed gAuNP1nm corresponds well with UV–vis results, being that they are too small to possess plasmon bands. The histogram of gAuNP1nm shows that the core size of the nanoparticles is highly populated at ~ 1.2 nm.
Fig. 2

TEM images and histograms of a gAuNP10nm, b gAuNP3nm, and c gAuNP1nm

TEM images of cAuNP3nm and cAuNR (Fig. 3) show that the cAuNP3nm have spherical shape with average core size of ~ 2.7 nm and the cAuNR are highly ordered, uniform in size and shape, and show no evidence of coarsening. Histograms for cAuNR show size distributions for both length and width with the majority of nanorods being ~ 55 nm in length and ~ 15 nm in width (an aspect ratio of 3.5:1). The first column of Table 1 summarizes the average core size and their respective standard deviations of the gAuNP, cAuNP, and cAuNR.
Fig. 3

TEM images and histograms of a cAuNP3nm and b cAuNR

Table 1

Core size evolution of gold nanoparticles and nanorods (nanometers)

 

Free standing

Supported on GO (or tGO)

Heated at 50 °C

Heated at 100 °C

Heated at 150 °C

Heated at 200 °C

gAuNP10nm

11.1 ± 1.2

10.1 ± 6.9

10.9 ± 4.8

11.5 ± 6.6

20.2 ± 8.6

22.1 ± 6.2

gAuNP3nm

3.0 ± 1.4

3.0 ± 0.9a

2.9 ± 1.1

(on tGO)

3.1 ± 1.8a

3.1 ± 1.1

(on tGO)

3.3 ± 1.6a

3.3 ± 1.6

(on tGO)

7.0 ± 3.6a

5.1 ± 2.0

(on tGO)

10.1 ± 5.4a

7.6 ± 3.8

(on tGO)

gAuNP1nm

1.2 ± 0.3

1.3 ± 0.4

1.4 ± 0.5

1.4 ± 0.7

4.7 ± 0.8

5.3 ± 1.6

cAuNP3nm

2.7 ± 1.1

3.6 ± 1.6

10.0 ± 6.0

13.7 ± 10.5

68.5 ± 20.1

cAuNR

53.6 ± 8.2

15.1 ± 3.6

53.8 ± 13.2a

17.3 ± 6.3a

54.4 ± 7.1

14.8 ± 2.3

(on tGO)

89.4 ± 52.3a

n.aa

52.4 ± 6.7

12.9 ± 2.2

(on tGO)

a The data are from the previous publication [24]

3.2 Gold nanoparticles and nanorods on graphene oxide

The gAuNP with different sizes were attached to the surface of GO via non-covalent interactions such as hydrogen bonding and electrostatic interactions between COOH/OH groups of GO and COO/NH2 groups of glutathione ligands on gAuNP. The cAuNP and cAuNR were self-assembled onto the surface of GO mostly via electrostatic interactions of R4N+ groups of bilayer CTAB ligands with the COO groups of GO. UV–vis spectra of gAuNP-GO with different core sizes, cAuNP3nm-GO, and cAuNR-GO are shown in Fig. 4. When gAuNP10nm are assembled onto GO, the SP bands of gold broadens and red-shifts, which are consistent with the results reported by Huang et al. [33]. It has been shown that such a change in the plasmon band of the large gold nanoparticles in the GO hybrids indicate the significant formation of AuNP aggregates on the GO sheets [34, 35]. After the adsorption of gAuNP3nm on GO, the SP bands of gold at ~ 520 nm mostly disappear as shown in the UV–vis spectrum. In our previous work, we found that this optical change is not associated with the core size change of AuNP after adsorption [24]. For the UV–vis spectrum of gAuNP1nm, three characteristic absorption bands at 680, 450, and 410 nm completely disappeared after the assembly onto GO exhibiting only an exponential decay in absorbance with a decrease in energy. The spectra feature now resembles that of 1.5–2 nm AuNP which do not possess any significant adsorption and SP bands in the UV–vis spectra. Recently, Ghosh et al. [36] have shown that Au25SR18 clusters undergo core size evolution to Au135 clusters after the deposition on GO in THF. This result indicated that the disappearance of three absorption bands after adsorption onto GO and an appearance of small hints of SP bands at ~ 520 nm in UV–vis spectrum of the gAuNP1nm-GO hybrids was likely caused by the core size evolution of small and less stable gold cluster core to gold nanoparticles with core size of > 1.4 nm.
Fig. 4

UV-vis spectra of a gAuNP10nm-GO, gAuNP3nm-GO, and gAuNP1nm-GO and b cAuNP3nm-GO and cAuNR-GO

When cAuNP3nm and cAuNR are deposited on GO, the SP bands at ~ 520 nm almost completely disappear and the longitudinal plasmon band of cAuNR decreases in intensity (Fig. 4b), which is another piece of evidence for electronic and optical interference of GO for plasmonic nanostructures. Such changes in the plasmon response of cAuNR adsorbed on GO have also been observed by others [37, 38]. The absence of any shift for the longitudinal plasmon band of cAuNR indicated, however, that the aspect ratio of cAuNR mostly remained the same.

Additional file 1: Figure S1 shows TEM images of various gAuNP-GO hybrid materials and their respective histograms showing size distribution. GO sheets are apparent in all the TEM images as darker regions. The actual particle core size of gAuNP10nm-GO is estimated to be ~ 10 nm, which is similar to the size of free standing gAuNP10nm (Table 1). However, the images showed many particles to be positioned closely together making an accurate histogram analysis a bit more difficult. These apparent formations of nanoparticle aggregates must be the main reason for the large red shift of the SP bands of gAuNP10nm after GO adsorption. TEM image and histogram results agreed that the gAuNP3nm-GO have relatively well dispersed nanoparticles with the average core size near ~ 3 nm. The histogram results indicated gAuNP3nm are relatively stable after GO immobilization showing no evidence of core size evolution. For gAuNP1nm-GO hybrids, TEM images and histogram results indicated there is a slight increase in average core size of gAuNP1nm after adsorption onto GO. This size change corresponded well with the UV–vis results of gAuNP1nm-GO and support the previous discovery reported by Ghosh et al. [36] regarding the size evolution of Au25 clusters when in contact with graphene substrate.

TEM results shown in Additional file 1: Figure S2 indicated that cAuNP3nm and cAuNR are immobilized on GO without any aggregation or reshaping maintaining a similar core size and an aspect ratio of over 3 (~ 54 nm in length and ~ 17 nm in width), respectively. The TEM results agreed relatively well with their corresponding UV–vis spectra of their original sizes and shapes shown in Fig. 4b. The dampening of the plasmon bands of cAuNP3nm and cAuNR at ~ 520 nm was clearly not a result of any significant morphological size or shape changes.

When comparing the core sizes of the nanoparticles before and after their assembly onto GO, it is clear that the use of pre-formed nanoparticles mostly affords the retention of core size and dispersity of assembled nanoparticles without any significant change. However, very small clusters (~ 1 nm) and large colloidal nanoparticles (> 10 nm) that usually exhibit low stability alone in solution phase are also susceptible to a slight change in their morphologies after immobilization on GO. This result is confirmed by TEM analysis and the changes in their optical activity. Gold nanorods immobilized on GO avoided extensive aggregations suggesting the presence of CTAB bilayer ligands on their surfaces.

3.3 Effects of core size on coarsening of gAuNP on GO

Our previous work has shown that the presence of GO facilitates the coarsening of gAuNP3nm [24]. As shown in Table 1, large increases in the average core size of gAuNP3nm on GO took place at heating temperatures between 100 and 150 °C. The transition, however, took place between 150 and 200 °C for free standing gAuNP3nm [24]. The hypothesis was that the GO, being a flexible material, can bend and wrap around the nanoparticles and chemically interact with the ligands due to the presence of many oxygen-containing functional groups. The ligands on AuNP are then pulled away from the nanoparticle and spilled over to GO during heat treatment facilitating the coarsening of the nanoparticles.

Heat treatments of gAuNP10nm-GO and gAuNP1nm-GO were performed from 50 to 200 °C at 50 °C increments to see the effects of particle size on the heat-induced coarsening behavior of gAuNP. UV–vis spectra of gAuNP10nm-GO showed the decreased intensity and significant broadening of SP bands after the heat treatments of the hybrids at 100 °C, which is lower than the temperature required for gAuNP3nm-GO (Additional file 1: Figure S3). The transitions continued with heating at increased temperatures and quickly reached the status of film-like insoluble materials showing only small scattering effects [39, 40, 41]. This fast transition would likely be caused by the formation of particle aggregations upon the adsorption of gAuNP10nm on GO.

TEM results clearly indicated that the gAuNP10nm on GO undergo coarsening at the heating temperature at or above 100 °C (Fig. 5). After heat treatment at 100 °C (Fig. 8, 100 °C), particles are more aggregated with a few particles slightly merging together. After the heat treatment at 150 and 200 °C (Fig. 8, 150 °C, 200 °C), it is clearly visible from TEM images that the particles are coarsening. Table 1 summarizes the changes in the particle size of the heated gAuNP10nm on GO. A large increase in the average core size of gAuNP10nm was observed from 100 to 150 °C suggesting the overall transitions are similar to that of gAuNP3nm on GO and relatively in good agreement with both UV–vis results shown in Additional file 1: Figure S3 and those of gAuNP3nm-GO hybrids shown previously (Table 1).
Fig. 5

TEM images (scale bars = 100 nm) and size distribution of gAuNP10nm-GO heated at 50, 100, 150, and 200 °C

UV–vis spectra of gAuNP1nm-GO (Additional file 1: Figure S4) show that the transition is gradually taking place throughout the heating temperature between 50 and 200 °C with decreasing intensity of spectra. The film-like spectral feature has appeared after heat treatments at 200 °C. This overall transition after heat treatment resembles quite similarly to that of gAuNP10nm-GO as shown above. The presence of small SP bands of gold is apparent for gAuNP1nm-GO after heating at 50 °C, which indicates some aggregation and coarsening of nanoparticles to slightly larger nanoparticles (~ 1.5–2.5 nm). The absence of any strong SP bands after heating at high temperature, however, indicates that the significant coarsening of gAuNP1nm on GO to larger (> 3 nm) particles did not take place.

TEM images of the heated gAuNP1nm-GO are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S5 and the changes in the average core size and distribution are summarized in Table 1. The results suggested that the more rapid transition is observed at temperature below 150 °C for the gAuNP1nm-GO compared to other gAuNP on GO. The gAuNP1nm-GO began to reach the extensive coarsening stage and became mostly insoluble during the heat treatment at 200 °C. These results also corresponded well with the data obtained from UV–vis spectra.

3.4 Effects of capping ligands for coarsening of gold nanoparticles on graphene oxide (gAuNP3nm-GO vs cAuNP3nm-GO)

To understand the effects of capping ligands on the stability of assembled gold nanoparticles, the heat treatment of cAuNP3nm-GO was performed and its results were compared to those of gAuNP3nm-GO published in our previous report [24]. UV–vis spectra of the heated cAuNP3nm-GO were somewhat different to those of gAuNP3nm-GO showing a progressive depression of absorbance intensity. The UV–vis spectra of heat-treated cAuNP3nm-GO would only reveal the rapid decrease in the overall absorbance without the appearance of SP or even scattering bands (Fig. 6). This is due to the rapid flocculation of hybrid materials even at 50 °C causing the visible precipitation of cAuNP3nm –GO. TEM images of heated cAuNP3nm-GO clearly indicated that cAuNP undergo coarsening to larger particles when heated at 50 °C (Fig. 7). The histogram analyses results shown in Fig. 7 and Table 1 confirmed a very fast increase in the average size of cAuNP to ~ 10, 14, and 68 nm after heat treatments at 50 °C, 100 °C, and 150 °C, respectively. The large increases in average size of cAuNP after heat treatment suggested that the extensive coarsening of cAuNP on GO takes place at lower temperature. The weak binding affinity of CTAB with AuNP most likely causes CTAB to be more easily stripped by the GO and AuNP to diffuse on GO to form aggregates at faster rate.
Fig. 6

UV-vis spectra of cAuNP3nm-GO before and after heat treatment at 50 °C

Fig. 7

TEM images and histograms of cAuNP3nm-GO heated at 50, 100, and 150 °C

3.5 Effects of additional thiol functional groups on graphene oxide for coarsening of gold nanoparticles and nanorods (GO vs tGO)

The gAuNP3nm and cAuNR were also adsorbed on thiol-functionalized GO (tGO) to study the effect of additional thiol-gold interaction between nanoparticles and GO during coarsening or reshaping. The tGO was prepared by the well-established method using the coupling of l-cysteine to graphene oxide in the presence of EDC and NHS [22, 30, 32]. The tGO was then mixed with a solution containing gAuNP3nm or cAuNR which resulted in the self-assembly of nanoparticles onto the surface of tGO with the formation of gold-sulfur bonds in addition to all electrostatic interactions unmodified GO provide. TEM and histogram results showed that the gAuNP3nm-tGO still have the surface immobilized particles with the average core size near ~ 3 nm (Additional file 1: Figure S6). Any immediate aggregation after the adsorption of gAuNP3nm on tGO was not observed from TEM results.

Additional file 1: Figure S7 shows the UV–vis spectra of gAuNP3nm-tGO after heat treatments at temperature ranging from 50 to 200 °C. The intensity of SP bands along with the overall absorbance spectra, which show an exponential decay from lower wavelength to higher wavelength, continuously decreased after heat treatments at the range between 50 and 150 °C. The results were almost identical with the ones observed for gAuNP3nm-GO indicating the particles have begun to aggregate and become partially insoluble [24]. The UV–vis spectra of gAuNP3nm-tGO heated at 200 °C showed completely different spectral features for the particles heated at high temperature, which resemble the characteristic of localized metallic film-like structures [24, 39, 40, 41, 42].

Additional file 1: Figure S8 shows TEM images of heated gAuNP3nm-tGO at temperature from 50 to 150 °C. These results showed that the average core size increase occurred the most between 100 and 150 °C as we have seen from the heat treatments of gAuNP3nm-GO. However, after heating at 150 °C, TEM image and histogram results showed that the gAuNP3nm-tGO had a smaller average core size (5.09 ± 1.97 nm) than gAuNP3nm-GO (7.04 ± 3.61 nm). Although the difference is still within the standard deviation of each sample, the result suggests that there might be some stabilizing influence of tGO with the formation of Au–S bonds between tGO and gAuNP (Table 1). The presence of stronger Au–S bonds in addition to other electrostatic interactions would provide more robust interactions between nanoparticles and GO. Thus, with the use of tGO, the immobilized AuNP would be more kinetically trapped and become slightly less susceptible to aggregation and coarsening.

The influence of thiol functional group of tGO on reshaping behavior of cAuNR was also investigated. The cAuNR was adsorbed on the surface of tGO and the heat treatment results at 50 °C were compared to those of cAuNR-GO. Figure 8 shows the UV–vis spectrum of cAuNR-tGO which has the longitudinal SP bands of cAuNR-tGO appear at higher wavelength of ~ 830 nm compared to those of cAuNR and cAuNR-GO. This shift is likely a result from the plasmonic shift caused by the formation of Au–S bonds [6]. TEM image of cAuNR-tGO shown in Fig. 9 confirmed the size and shape of cAuNR remained mostly intact after the adsorption on tGO. UV–vis spectra and TEM image of cAuNR-tGO after heat treatment at 50 °C are also shown in Figs. 8 and 9, respectively. Although the intensity of the longitudinal plasmon band has decreased slightly, the overall spectral feature remains almost constant after heat treatment. This result was different from the previous studies on cAuNR-GO, in which the UV–vis spectra of heated samples at 50 °C showed a complete disappearance of the plasmon band at 780 nm [24]. TEM images also showed that there is little change in nanorod shape when cAuNR-tGO is heated at 50 °C. In comparison, cAuNR-GO underwent a complete reshaping of nanorods to spherical particles after the heat treatment at 50 °C (Table 1) [24]. The results confirmed the presence of stronger interactions between GO and cAuNR and demonstrated dramatically improved stability of AuNR during heat treatments. The heat treatments at temperature 100 °C or higher, however, caused the cAuNR to undergo a complete reshaping to spherical particles.
Fig. 8

UV-vis spectra of cAuNR-tGO before and after heat treatment at 50 °C

Fig. 9

TEM images (scale bars = 100 nm) of a cAuNR-tGO and b cAuNR-tGO heated at 50 °C

4 Conclusions

In this study, the coarsening behavior of gold nanoparticles on graphene oxide was investigated with the focus on the influence of particle core size, stabilizing ligands, and thiol linkers. For gold nanoparticles, the core size evolution was slightly affected by the size of nanoparticles. Gold nanoparticles smaller than 1.5 nm and large colloidal gold nanoparticles of ~ 10 nm were less stable than gold nanoparticles with ~ 3 nm core, undergoing immediate coarsening and/or aggregation upon adsorption on the surface of graphene oxide. The core size evolution during heat treatments at the temperature ranging from 50 to 200 °C, however, was similar for all three gold nanoparticles with different core sizes. Glutathione was observed to be a more stabilizing ligand than CTAB by having a stronger bond with the gold surface and a greater resistance to being removed from the nanoparticles by graphene oxide. Much greater core size evolution was observed from CTAB-capped gold nanoparticles on graphene oxide. The presence of thiol linkers on graphene oxide allowed for the formation of strong Au–S bonds that immobilized the nanoparticles strongly onto graphene oxide. The improvement in the stability of nanoparticles by Au–S bond formation was even more profound for the gold nanorods. The heat treatments of gold nanorods on graphene oxide at 50 °C resulted in the complete reshaping of nanorods to spherical particles. Under the same condition, the reshaping of gold nanorods on thiol-functionalized graphene oxide was not observed indicating that the formation of Au–S bonds allows the gold nanorod to withstand the thermal energy even after the disruption of CTAB ligands around nanorods. The overall results proved that small modification in the nanoparticle and/or graphene oxide functional groups would have a large influence on intrinsic stability of nanomaterials.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

HP and SL contributed equally on conducting both experimental work related to the synthesis and characterization of nanoparticles, nanoparticle hybrids, and heat-treated hybrids. NW and BW contributed partially for TEM imaging and analysis of nanoparticles and hybrids. YS supervised the project. The manuscript was initially written through contributions of HP and SL and revised by BW and YS. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Institute of General Medical Science (#SC3GM089562) of the National Institutes of Health.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

40580_2018_171_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (930 kb)
Additional file 1. Materials, synthetic methods, instrumentation methods, and TEM images and UV–vis spectra of Au nanoparticles and nanorods.

References

  1. 1.
    E.S. Kooij, W. Ahmed, H.J.W. Zandvliet, B. Poelsema, Localized plasmon in noble metal nanospheroids. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 10321–10332 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    C. Tan, X. Huang, H. Zhang, Synthesis and applications of graphene-based noble metal nanostructures. Mater. Today 16, 29–36 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. Muszynski, B. Seger, P.V. Kamat, Decorating graphene sheets with gold nanoparticles. J. Phys. Chem. C 112, 5263–5266 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Zhao, N. Li, D. Astruc, State of the art in nanoparticle synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 257, 638–665 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    H.S. Bae, E. Seo, S. Jang, K.H. Park, B.-S. Kim, Hybrid gold nanoparticle-reduced graphene oxide nanosheets as active catalysts for highly efficient reduction of nitroarenes. J. Mater. Chem. 21, 15431–15436 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X. Zhang, J. Zhang, H. Wang, Y. Hao, X. Zhang, T. Wang, Y. Wang, R. Zhao, H. Zhang, B. Yang, Thermal-induced surface plasmon band shift of gold nanoparticle monolayer: morphology and refractive index sensitivity. Nanotechnology 21, 1–11 (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    P.K. Jain, X. Huang, I.H. El-Sayed, M.A. El-Sayed, Review of some interesting surface plasmon resonance-enhanced properties of noble metal nanoparticles and their applications to biosystems. Plasmonics 2, 107–118 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    C. Hu, J. Rong, J. Cui, Y. Yang, L. Yang, Y. Wang, Y. Liu, Fabrication of a graphene oxide-gold nanorod hybrid material by electrostatic self-assembly for surface-enhanced Raman scattering. Carbon 51, 255–264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    E.T. Castellana, R.C. Gamez, D.H. Russell, Label-free biosensing with lipid-functionalized gold nanorods. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133, 4182–4185 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    P.T. Yin, T.-H. Kim, J.-W. Choi, K.-B. Lee, Prospects for graphene-nanoparticle-based hybrid sensors. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 12785–12799 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    W. Hong, H. Bai, Y. Xu, Z. Yao, Z. Gu, G. Shi, Preparation of gold nanoparticle/graphene composites with controlled weight contents and their application in biosensors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 1822–1826 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    L. Polavarapu, M. Manna, Q.-H. Xu, Biocompatible glutathione capped gold clusters as one- and two-photon excitation fluorescence contrast agents for live cells imaging. Nanoscale 3, 429–434 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Z. Zhang, L. Sun, Conjugating folic acid to gold nanoparticles through glutathione for targeting and detecting cancer cells. Bioorganic Med. Chem. 18, 5528–5534 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Xu, D. Yang, L. Mei, B. Lu, L. Chen, Q. Li, H. Zhu, T. Wang, Encapsulating gold nanoparticles or nanorods in graphene oxide shells as a novel gene vector. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 2715–2724 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Y.-S. Shon, D. Choi, J. Dare, T. Dinh, Synthesis of nanoparticle-cored dendrimers by convergent dendritic functionalization of monolayer-protected nanoparticles. Langmuir 24, 6924–6931 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Y.-S. Shon, H.Y. Choi, M.S. Guerrero, C. Kwon, Preparation of nanostructured film arrays for transmission localized surface plasmon sensing. Plasmonics 4, 95–105 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Z. Nuño, B. Hessler, J. Ochoa, Y.-S. Shon, C. Bonney, Y. Abate, Nanoscale subsurface- and material-specific identification of single nanoparticles. Opt. Express 19, 20865–20875 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Q. Zhuo, Y. Ma, J. Gao, P. Zhang, Y. Xia, Y. Tian, X. Sun, J. Zhong, X. Sun, Facile synthesis of graphene/metal nanoparticle composites via self-catalysis reduction at room temperature. Inorg. Chem. 52, 3141–3147 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    S.E. Lohse, J.A. Dahl, J.E. Hutchison, Direct synthesis of large water-soluble functionalized gold nanoparticles using Bunte salts as ligand precursors. Langmuir 26, 7504–7511 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Ismaili, D. Geng, A.X. Sun, T.T. Kantzas, M.S. Workentin, Light-activated covalent formation of gold nanoparticle-graphene and gold nanoparticle-glass composites. Langmuir 27, 13261–13268 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    J. Hrbek, F.M. Hoffmann, J.B. Park, P. Liu, D. Stacchiola, Y.S. Hoo, S. Ma, A. Nambu, J.A. Rodriguez, M.G. White, Adsorbate-driven morphological changes of a gold surface at low temperature. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 17272–17273 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    M.W. Sugden, T.H. Richardson, G. Leggett, Sub-10 Ω resistance gold films prepared by removal of ligands from thiol-stabilized 6 nm gold nanoparticles. Langmuir 26, 4331–4338 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    S. Sun, P. Wu, Easy fabrication of macroporous gold films using graphene sheets as a template. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 5, 3481–3486 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    H. Pan, S. Low, N. Weerasuriya, Y.-S. Shon, Graphene oxide-promoted reshaping and coarsening of gold nanorods and nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 3406–3413 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    E.-S.A.M. Al-Sherbini, UV-visible light reshaping of gold nanorods. Mater. Chem. Phys. 121, 349–353 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    M. Gordel, J. Olesiak-Banska, K. Matczyszyn, C. Nogues, M. Buckle, M. Samoc, Post-synthesis reshaping of gold nanorods using a femtosecond laser. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 16, 71–78 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Y. Horiguchi, K. Honda, Y. Kato, N. Nakashima, Y. Niidome, Photothermal reshaping of gold nanorods depends on the passivating layers of the nanorod surfaces. Langmuir 24, 12026–12031 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    K.G. Stamplecoskie, Y.-S. Chen, P.V. Kamat, Excited-state behavior of luminescent glutathione-protected gold clusters. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 1370–1376 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    S. Deol, N. Weerasuriya, Y.-S. Shon, Stability, cytotoxicity, and cell uptake of water-soluble dendron-conjugated gold nanoparticles with 3, 12, and 17 nm core. J. Mater. Chem. B 3, 6071–6080 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Z. Wu, J. Suhan, R. Jin, One-pot synthesis of atomically monodisperse, thiol-functionalized Au25 nanoclusters. J. Mater. Chem. 19, 622–626 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    S. Kumar, R. Jin, Water-soluble Au25(Capt)18 nanoclusters: synthesis, thermal stability, and optical properties. Nanoscale 4, 4222–4227 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    X. Gong, Y. Bi, Y. Zhao, G. Liu, W.Y. Teoh, Graphene oxide-based electrochemical sensor: a platform for ultrasensitive detection of heavy metal ions. RSC Adv. 4, 24653–24657 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    J. Huang, L. Zhang, B. Chen, N. Ji, F. Chen, Y. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Nanocomposites of size-controlled gold nanoparticles and graphene oxide: formation and applications in SERS and catalysis. Nanoscale 2, 2733–2738 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    N.E.A. Reeler, K.A. Lerstrup, W. Somerville, J. Speder, S.V. Petersen, B.W. Laursen, M. Arenz, X. Qiu, T. Vosch, K. Nørgaard, Gold nanoparticles assembled with dithiocarbamate-anchored molecular wires. Sci. Rep. 5, 15273 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    H. Yao, L. Jin, H.J. Sue, Y. Sumi, R. Nishimura, Facile decoration of Au nanoparticles on reduced graphene oxide surfaces via a one-step chemical functionalization approach. J. Mater. Chem. A 1, 10783–10789 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    A. Ghosh, T. Pradeep, J. Chakrabarti, Coalescence of atomically precise clusters on graphenic surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 118, 13959–13964 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    P.P.H.C. Cheng, D. Silvester, G. Wang, G. Kalyuzhny, A. Douglas, R.W. Murray, Dynamic and static quenching of fluorescence by 1 − 4 nm diameter gold monolayer-protected clusters. J. Phys. Chem. B 110, 4637–4644 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Z. Xia, P. Li, Y. Wang, T. Song, Q. Zhang, B. Sun, Solution-processed gold nanorods integrated with graphene for near-infrared photodetection via hot carrier injection. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 7, 24136–24141 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Y.-S. Shon, M. Aquino, T.V. Pham, D. Rave, M. Ramirez, K. Lin, P. Vaccarello, G. Lopez, T. Gredig, C. Kwon, Stability and morphology of gold nanoisland arrays generated from layer-by-layer assembled nanoparticle multilayer films: effects of heating temperature and particle size. J. Phys. Chem. C 115, 10597–10605 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    S.R. Isaacs, H. Choo, W.-B. Ko, Y.-S. Shon, Chemical, thermal, and ultrasonic stability of hybrid nanoparticles and nanoparticle multilayer films. Chem. Mater. 18, 107–114 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    P. Vaccarello, L. Tran, J. Meinen, C. Kwon, Y. Abate, Y.-S. Shon, Characterization of localized surface plasmon resonance transducers produced from Au25 nanoparticle multilayers. Colloids Surf. A 402, 146–151 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    M. Kim, C. Lee, J. Jang, Fabrication of highly flexible, scalable, and high-performance supercapacitors using polyaniline/reduced graphene oxide film with enhanced electrical conductivity and crystallinity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 24, 2489–2499 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemistry and BiochemistryCalifornia State University, Long BeachLong BeachUSA

Personalised recommendations