Advertisement

Relationship between vitamin D and chronic spontaneous urticaria: a systematic review

  • Papapit Tuchinda
  • Kanokvalai Kulthanan
  • Leena Chularojanamontri
  • Sittiroj Arunkajohnsak
  • Sutin Sriussadaporn
Open Access
Research
  • 254 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Vitamin D has been reported to be associated with many allergic diseases. There are a limited number of the studies of vitamin D supplementation in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU). This study aims to study the relationship between vitamin D and CSU in terms of serum vitamin D levels, and the outcomes of vitamin D supplementation.

Methods

A literature search of electronic databases for all relevant articles published between 1966 and 2018 was performed. The systematic literature review was done following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis recommendations.

Results

Seventeen eligible studies were included. Fourteen (1321 CSU cases and 6100 controls) were concerned with serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients. Twelve studies showed statistically significant lower serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients than the controls. Vitamin D deficiency was reported more commonly for CSU patients (34.3–89.7%) than controls (0.0–68.9%) in 6 studies. Seven studies concerned with vitamin D supplementation in CSU patients showed disease improvement after high-dosages of vitamin D supplementation.

Conclusion

CSU patients had significantly lower serum vitamin D levels than the controls in most studies. However, the results did not prove causation, and the mechanisms were not clearly explained. Despite the scarcity of available studies, this systematic review showed that a high dosage of vitamin D supplementation for 4–12 weeks might help to decrease the disease activity in some CSU patients. Well-designed randomized placebo-controlled studies are needed to determine the cut-off levels of vitamin D for supplementation and treatment outcomes.

Abbreviations

1,25(OH)2D

1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D

25(OH)D

25-hydroxyvitamin D

BMI

body mass index

CIU

chronic idiopathic urticaria

CSU

chronic spontaneous urticaria

CU

chronic urticaria

GC

group-specific component

IL

interleukin

RCT

randomized controlled trial

SLE

systemic lupus erythematosus

SNPs

single nucleotide polymorphisms

Treg cells

regulatory T cells

UAS

urticaria activity score

UK

United Kingdom

VDBP

vitamin D binding protein

VDR

vitamin D receptor

Background

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is defined as the occurrence of spontaneous wheals, angioedema, or both for more than 6 weeks [1]. Recommended first-line treatment is modern, second-generation H1-antihistamines. For refractory patients, a short course of systemic corticosteroids, omalizumab or ciclosporin is recommended [1].

Vitamin D, a fat-soluble vitamin, exists in two forms: D2 (ergocalciferol) and D3 (cholecalciferol) [2]. The human body gains it from the diet and sunlight. Vitamin D2 has been found in some mushrooms, e.g., shiitake mushrooms and button mushrooms. Vitamin D3 is commonly found in halibut, mackerel, eel, salmon, beef liver, and egg yolks [3]. Within the human body, only the skin can produce vitamin D3. Ultraviolet B radiation (wavelength, 290–315 nm) converts 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin to previtamin D3, which is rapidly converted to vitamin D3. Vitamins D2 and D3 from diets and vitamin D3 from skin photobiosynthesis are initially metabolized by the liver enzyme 25-hydroxylase (CYP2R1) to 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), the major circulating metabolite which is commonly used for evaluation of vitamin D status. The 25(OH)D is metabolized in the kidneys by the enzyme 25-hydroxyvitamin D-1α-hydroxylase (CYP27B1) to 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)2D), the most biologically active form of vitamin D [2].

Vitamin D plays a major role in mineral homeostasis [2]. Besides its role in bone physiology, it also has a role on cutaneous immunity by binding to its nuclear receptors and plasma membrane receptors of epithelial cells, and to various cells such as mast cells, monocytes, macrophages, T-cells, B-cells, and dendritic cells [4, 5]. In the innate immune system, vitamin D contributes to improving antimicrobial defenses by stimulating the expression of antimicrobial peptides such as cathelicidin and human β-defensin [6]. In the adaptive immune system, in vitro study showed that physiologic (in vivo) concentration of 25(OH)D3 in serum-free medium can activate T cells to express CYP27B1 and then convert 25(OH)D3 to 1,25(OH)2D3. (active form of vitamin D) [7]. Vitamin D can suppress dendritic cell maturation and inhibits Th1 cell proliferation by decreasing Th1 cytokine secretion. It also induces hyporesponsiveness by blocking proinflammatory Th17 cytokine secretion and decreasing interleukin (IL)-2 production from regulatory T (Treg) cells. It inhibits B-lymphocyte function resulting in the reduction of immunoglobulin E production [8, 9]. Moreover, vitamin D has influences on the proliferation, survival, differentiation, and function of mast cells [5, 10].

The vitamin D binding protein (VDBP) and vitamin D receptor (VDR) are two proteins that influence the biological actions. VDBP is the main carrier protein in the circulation. Group-specific component (GC) is the gene that encodes VDBP [11]. Genetic polymorphism in the GC gene influences the concentration of VDBP and its affinity for vitamin D. Regarding VDR, the binding of VDR to vitamin D results in epigenetic modification and transcription of various specific genes [12]. The human VDR gene is located in chromosome 12. Polymorphism in the VDR gene has been shown to alter VDR functions that affect vitamin D activities [13]. Among the VDR polymorphisms, the SNPs rs1544410 and rs2228570 are frequently studied in association with allergic diseases. However, Nasiri–Kalmarzi et al. reported no significant correlation between the VDR rs2228570 and VDBP rs7041 SNPs and the development of chronic urticaria (CU), although they found a positive correlation between serum VDBP and the progression of CU. They concluded that alteration of the vitamin D pathway at the gene and protein levels may be a risk factor for the progression of CU [14].

There have been reports of an association between vitamin D and allergic diseases, such as food allergies, rhinosinusitis, recurrent wheeze, asthma, atopic dermatitis, and CSU [15, 16, 17]. Some studies have shown that vitamin D is involved in the etiopathogenesis of CSU, while other studies have demonstrated clinical improvement in CSU with vitamin D supplements. However, there are a limited number of studies on this issue, and their results are inconsistent. [14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

We performed a systematic review to examine the serum vitamin D levels in patients with CSU. Data concerning vitamin D supplementation in the CSU patients were also studied to determine whether supplementation impacts treatment outcomes.

Methods

Search strategy and selection criteria

This systematic review adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis recommendations (PRISMA).

A literature search of electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, and CINAHL) for all relevant articles published between Jan 1, 1966, and September 30, 2018 was conducted using the search term “chronic urticaria and vitamin D or 25(OH)D insufficiency or deficiency or 1,25 (OH)2 vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency” The titles and abstracts of the articles identified in the search were screened by two independent reviewers (KK and SA) for eligibility based on the inclusion criterion. Full texts were then obtained and assessed for eligibility by those two reviewers (KK and SA). A further manual search of the references cited in the selected articles was subsequently performed to identify any relevant studies that might have been missed in the initial search. Finally, all yielded relevant reports were systematically reviewed (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of literature review in this study. Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in our systematic review. *Of the 14 studies, the relation between serum vitamin D level and CSU were assessed [14, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. In 7 studies, various severity assessment were used to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation in CSU patients [19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31, 32]. CSU chronic spontaneous urticaria

Any types of publication involving vitamin D in CSU patients were included in our systemic review. The exclusion criteria were: (1) articles that were not published in English; (2) duplicated publications; (3) studies published only in abstract form; and (4) continuous medical education (CME) and review articles.

Assessment of risk of bias in included studies

Two investigators (KK and SA) assessed the risk of bias of the eligible studies included in this systematic review. We used Cochrane Collaboration’s tool to assess the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool was used to assess the risk of bias in non-RCT studies.

Data extraction for serum vitamin D levels and CSU

The search strategies were mainly used to identify vitamin D levels, and to compare the levels found in CSU patients and controls. Serum vitamin D levels are mostly reported in the form 25(OH)D. After the eligible full-text articles were reviewed and the relevant data reported in those articles were further searched, the following information was extracted from each: the first author, year of publication, type of study, number and characteristics of the population, number of cases and controls, method of vitamin D measurement, type (form) and unit of the measured serum vitamin D, vitamin D levels in case and control groups, and study outcomes. Information was completely and carefully extracted from the eligible articles.

Data extraction for treatment or supplementation of vitamin D

We also examined whether vitamin D supplementation has an impact on the outcomes of urticaria treatment. All relevant data were extracted, namely, the first author, year of publication, type of study, number and characteristics of cases and/or controls, form, dosage and duration of vitamin D treatment, assessment duration, methods and parameters for outcome measurement, vitamin D status at baseline and after vitamin D treatment, and treatment outcomes.

Results

Literature search

The detailed steps of the literature search are illustrated in the flow chart at Fig. 1. A total of 140 potentially relevant studies were found. The titles and abstracts of these articles were reviewed. Of the 117 excluded studies, 42 were removed due to duplication and 75 were irrelevant; the remainder (23 studies) were screened for full text review. According to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 5 review articles were excluded, and 1 study was excluded because it had not been published in English. The full texts of the remaining 17 studies were extensively reviewed, and all were finally included [14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33].

Characteristics of included studies

The 17 studies were published during the period 2010–2018 [14, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33]. The main characteristics of the studies were summarized into two issues: serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients, and outcomes of vitamin D supplementation in CSU patients.

Risk of bias

Three RCTs in our systematic review were estimated mainly at low risk. The majority of the non-RCT studies had a low risk of bias according to ROBIN-I assessment.

Serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients

Fourteen studies were concerned with serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients. There were 1 RCT [32], 3 cross-sectional studies [20, 22, 33], 8 case–control studies [14, 18, 21, 23, 24, 25, 28, 31], and 2 retrospective reviews [29, 30] (Table 1). All studies drew upon data from a total of 7421 participants, with 1321 patients with CSU and 6100 controls, including 5456 healthy controls, and 25 cases of allergic rhinitis controls. The remaining 619 participants were 593 acute urticaria patients and 26 atopic dermatitis patients. Statistical analyses for meta-analysis were not performed due to the substantial heterogeneity of the reported data.
Table 1

Serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients

Study, year

Study size/population

Vitamin D data

Outcome

Methods

Units

Serum 25(OH)D levels

CSU

Controls

Cross-sectional study

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

45 CSU

45 age-, sex-matched healthy controls

ELISA kit

(Euroimmun AG, Lubeck, Germany)

ng/mL

12.7 ± 2.7

(mean ± SD)

24.3 ± 13.5

(mean ± SD)

(p < 0.0001)

Significant lower vitamin D levels among chronic urticaria patients and controls

Significant lower vitamin D levels in APST positive group (11.1 ± 2.1 ng/mL) compared with APST negative group (15.1 ± 1.3 ng/mL) (p < 0.0001)

Significant negative correlation between vitamin D levels and USS, IL-17, TGF-β1 and ESR (p < 0.0001)

Lee et al. [22]

57 CSU

567 acute urticaria

3159 controls

ND

ng/mL

22.9 ± 4.9

(mean ± SD)

Acute urticaria; 20.5 ± 5.1

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.069)

Controls; 20.0 ± 5.1

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.124)

The study was conducted in children

No significant difference in the 25(OH)D levels between CSU patients and acute urticaria patients and controls (p = 0.183)

Rather et al. [33]

110 CSU

110 age-, sex-matched healthy controls

Chemiluminescence method/kit method (Siemens, USA)

ng/mL

19.6 ± 6.9

(mean ± SD)

38.5 ± 6.7

(mean ± SD)

(p < 0.001)

Significant lower vitamin D levels in CSU patients compared with controls

Significant negative correlation between serum vitamin D level and UAS (p < 0.001)

Significant lower vitamin D levels in CSU patients with the ASST positive subjects than in the ASST negative subjects (p < 0.001)

No significant correlation between vitamin D level and duration of the disease

Case–control study

Thorp et al. [28]

25 CSU

25 allergic rhinitis controls

ND

ng/mL

29.4 ± 13.4

(mean ± SD)

39.6 ± 14.7

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.016)

Significantly reduced vitamin D levels in CSU patients compared with controls

No correlation of vitamin D levels and duration, severity of disease, ASST or thyroid autoantibody testing

No significant difference in the proportion of vitamin D deficiency between CSU groups and controls

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D deficiency (< 30 ng/mL)

48% (12/25)

28% (7/25)

(p = 0.24)

Abdel-Rehim et al. [18]

22 CSU

20 age- and sex-matched controls

Disease severity

8 (36.4%): moderate urticaria

(UAS7 = 16–27)

14 (63.6%): severe urticaria

(UAS7 = 28–42)

ELISA kit (Immundiagnostik AG,

Bensheim, Germany)

nmol/L

28.4 ± 9.09

(mean ± SD)

104.5 ± 76.8

(mean ± SD)

(p < 0.01)

Significantly lower vitamin D levels among patients in comparison to controls

Negative correlation between vitamin D levels and IgE levels (r = 0.45, p < 0.05)

No association between vitamin D levels and duration and the severity of the disease

Grzanka et al. [21]

35 CSU

33 age-, sex- and BMI (< 30) matched healthy controls

An automated direct electrochemiluminescence

immunoassay

(Elecsys, Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim Germany)

ng/mL

26.0

(median)

31.1

(median)

(p = 0.017)

Significantly lower serum 25(OH)D concentration in CSU group compared with the control subjects

No significant differences in serum 25(OH)D concentration between the mild and moderate-severe symptoms patients

Slightly significantly lower 25(OH)D concentrations in moderate-severe CSU than those of the controls (22.6 vs 31.1 ng/mL, p = 0.048)

No significant difference in vitamin D levels between mild CSU and healthy control subjects

Significantly higher proportion of vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) in patients with CSU than in the normal population

No significant difference in the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency (20–29 ng/mL) between CSU patients and the normal subjects

No significant correlations between serum concentration of CRP and 25(OH)D levels

No significant difference in serum 25(OH) concentrations and ASST testing

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D insufficiency (20–< 30 ng/mL)

31.4% (11/35)

39.4% (13/33)

(p = 0.41)

Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL)

31.4% (11/35)

 

6% (2/33)

(p = 0.025)

 

Severe vitamin D deficiency (< 10 ng/mL)

2.9% (1/35)

0% (0/33)

(p = 0.52)

Movahedi et al. [23]

114 CSU

187 sex- and age-matched healthy controls

Enzyme immunoassay method (EIA) (Immunodiagnostic system; IDS (LTD), UK)

ng/mL

15.8 ± 1.5

22.6 ± 1.6

(p = 0.005)

Significantly lower serum 25(OH)D concentration in CSU group compared to healthy subjects

No significant differences in vitamin D levels between autoimmune chronic urticaria patients and the control group (p = 0.11)

Significant association between vitamin D deficiency and increased susceptibility to CSU (p = 0.001)

A 2.4-fold (95% CI 1.4–4) risk of having CSU in individuals with vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/ml)

Significantly lower levels of vitamin D in patients with longer duration of urticaria symptoms (> 24 h) (p = 0.046)

A significant positive correlation between vitamin D levels and UAS (r = 0.2, p = 0.042)

No significant relationship between IgE levels and vitamin D levels

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D sufficiency

8.8% (10/114)

26.2% (49/187)

Vitamin D insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL)

15.8% (18/114)

16.6% (31/187)

Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL)

75.4% (86/114)

57.2% (107/187)

Rasool et al. [25]

(Randomized

case–control)

147 moderate-severe CSU

130 healthy controls

Enzyme immunoassay

ng/mL

17.87 ± 1.22

(mean ± SEM)

27.65 ± 1.65

(mean ± SEM)

(p < 0.0001)

Low serum 25(OH)D levels in 91% of CSU patients and 64% of the healthy subjects

Significantly lower vitamin D levels in CSU patients compared with controls

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL)

or Vitamin D deficiency (10–20 ng/mL)

91.3%

63.84%

(p < 0.0001)

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

(Prospective

case–control)

60 CSU

40 healthy controls

ND

ng/mL

15.0 (7–52)

median (min–max)

30.0 (25–46)

median (min–max)

(p < 0.001)

Significantly lower the median 25(OH)D concentration in the CSU group than the control group

Significantly higher patients with vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL) in the CSU group than the control group (p < 0.001)

No association between UAS7 and DLQI scores with 25(OH)D levels

Significant correlation between ESR and vitamin D levels (p = 0.001)

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D insufficiency (> 20–< 30 ng/mL)

28%

45%

(p = 0.38)

Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL)

55%

0%

(p < 0.001)

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

(Prospective

case–control)

58 CSU

45 healthy age-matched controls

Disease severity

3 (5.2%): mild urticaria

(UAS4a: 0–8)

15 (25.8%): moderate urticaria

(UAS4: 9–16)

40 (68.9%): severe urticaria

(UAS4: 17–24)

An automated direct electrochemiluminescence immunoassay

(Elecsys, Roche Diagnostic, Mannheim, Germany)

ug/L

All CSU

8.45 (1.1–52.5)

median (min–max)

(p < 0.001)

Mild-moderate CSU

8.95 (3.9–23.0)

median (min–max)

(p = 0.011)

Severe CSU

7.1 (1.1–52.5)

median (min–max)

(p < 0.001)

15.3 (3.1–61.0)

median (min–max)

Significantly lower serum 25(OH)D concentration in total CSU group, mild-moderate CSU group and severe CSU group compared to healthy subjects

Significantly higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in CSU patients

No significant differences in 25(OH)D levels between CSU patients with mild-moderate symptoms and severe symptoms

No significant differences between vitamin D-deficient or insufficient group regarding CU-Q2oL and UAS4 scores (p > 0.001)

No association between the anti-TG and the anti-TPO autoantibodies and the levels of vitamin D in CSU patients, (p = 0.641 and p = 0.373, respectively)

No association between the prevalence of high levels of total IgE and the levels of vitamin D in CSU patients (p = 0.5)

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D insufficiency (< 30 μg/L)

98.3% (57/58)

86.7% (39/45)

(p = 0.041)

Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 μg/L)

89.7% (52/58)

68.9% (31/45)

(p = 0.017)

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

110 CSU

110 healthy controls

Specific E LISA

(Monobind Inc., Lake Forest, CA, USA)

ng/mL

19.26 ± 1.26

(mean ± SEM)

31.72 ± 7.14

(mean ± SEM)

(p = 0.006)

Significantly lower serum vitamin D levels in chronic urticaria patients compared to controls

Significantly association between decreased levels of serum vitamin and increased susceptibility to chronic urticaria (p = 0.027)

Significant negative correlation between vitamin D levels with ASST and UAS (p < 0.001 and p = 0.001, respectively)

No significant correlation between vitamin D levels and serum total IgE (p = 0.083)

Higher prevalence of vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency in chronic urticaria patients

No significant correlation between vitamin D levels and total IgE levels

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency

58.02%

48.89%

Randomized controlled trial

Dabas et al. [32]

241CSU

184 healthy controls

ND

nmol/L

17.47 ± 13.36

(mean ± SD)

22.09 ± 14.06

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.002)

Significantly lower vitamin D level were in CSU patients than in healthy controls

No correlation between vitamin D deficiency and sex, ASST, APST, serum IgE, angioedema or disease duration

Vitamin D status

Vitamin D sufficiency (> 30 ng/mL)

20.91% (23/110)

64.54% (71/110)

Vitamin D insufficiency (20–30 ng/mL)

15.45% (17/110)

21.82% (24/110)

Vitamin D deficiency (< 20 ng/mL)

63.64% (70/110)

13.64% (15/110)

Retrospective study

Woo et al. [29]

72 CSU

26 acute urticaria

26 atopic dermatitis

72 healthy controls

ND

ng/mLb

CSU

Acute urticaria

Atopic dermatitis

Healthy controls

Both children and adults were enrolled

Significantly lower serum 25(OH)D3 levels in CSU group compared to those in the other groups

Significantly higher proportion of patients with critically low vitamin D levels (< 10 ng/mL) in the CSU group than in acute urticaria, atopic dermatitis, and healthy controls

Significant negative associations between the vitamin D levels and urticaria activity score and disease duration (p < 0.001, p = 0.008, respectively)

Significantly more critically low vitamin D status in the moderate/severe UAS group than in the mild UAS group (p = 0.03)

Significantly lower serum vitamin D levels in subjects with a positive ASST than in subjects with a negative result

Significantly higher number of patients with critically low vitamin D in the moderate/severe UAS group than in the mild UAS group (p = 0.03)

Significantly lower vitamin D levels in the ASST positive subjects (9.12 ± 4.25 ng/mL) than in the ASST negative subjects (13.33 ± 7.09 ng/mL) (p = 0.034)

Significantly higher proportion of those with critically low vitamin D status in the ASST positive group (60%) than in the ASST negative group (32%) (p = 0.021)

11.86 ± 7.16

(mean ± SD)

14.12 ± 5.56

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.024)

16.12 ± 8.09

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.008)

20.77 ± 9.74

(mean ± SD)

(p < 0.001)

Vitamin D status

Sufficiency (≥ 30 ng/mL)

2% (2/72)

0%

2%

20% (15/72)

Insufficiency (between 20 and 29 ng/mL)

10% (7/72)

11%

24%

27% (20/72)

Deficiency (< 20 ng/mL)

39% (28/72)

63%

46%

45% (32/72)

Critically low (< 10 ng/mL)

49% (35/72)

26% (6/26)

(p < 0.002)

28% (7/26)

(p < 0.004)

8% (5/72)

(p < 0.001)

Wu et al. [30]

225 CSU

1321 healthy controls

ND

nmol/L

CSU

Controls

Significantly higher vitamin D levels in CSU patients than the general population

51.4 ± 27.03

(mean ± SD)

45.4 ± 24.84

(mean ± SD)

(p = 0.001)

25(OH)D, 25-hydoxyvitamin D; anti-TG, anti-thyroglobulin; anti-TPO, anti-thyroidperoxidase; APST, autologous plasma skin test; ASST, autologous serum skin test; BMI, body mass index; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria; CU-Q2oL, chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; ELISA, enzyme linked immunesorbent assay; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; ND, not defined; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β1; UAS, urticaria activity score; USS, urticaria symptom severity

aUAS4 (the Urticaria Activity Score over 4 days; (scale 0–6) calculated as the sum of daily average morning and evening scores for itch severity (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) and number of hives (0, none; 1, < 20 hives; 2, 20–50 hives; and 3, > 50 hives)

bSerum vitamin D was evaluated as 25(OH)D3

The methods used for the measurement of vitamin D varied among the studies (Table 1). All of the studies reported the serum vitamin D level as 25(OH)D except two: one study by Woo et al. [29], which measured 25(OH)D3, and Nasiri–Kalmarzi’s study, which did not report the type of vitamin D measured [14]. The units of serum 25(OH)D were reported mainly in ng/mL [14, 20, 21, 22, 23, 25, 28, 29, 31, 33], but some studies reported them in µg/L [24] and nmol/L [18, 30, 32].

The main outcomes of the serum vitamin D levels in the CSU patients compared to the controls are summarized at Table 2. Twelve studies showed statistically significantly lower levels of serum vitamin D in the CSU patients than the controls [14, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 33]. Wu et al. showed significantly higher levels of serum vitamin D in the CSU patients [30]. They compared the serum vitamin D levels of CSU patients in Southampton General Hospital to those of the general United Kingdom (UK) population (data from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey). The serum vitamin D levels of the 225 CSU patients were significantly higher than those of the 1321 UK population (control group). Lee et al. conducted a cross-sectional, population-based study of Korean children (aged 4–13 years; 3159 were controls; 624 had current urticaria, of which 57 were CSU and 567 acute urticaria). There was no statistically significant difference in the serum vitamin D levels of the CSU patients and the controls (p = 0.124) [22].
Table 2

Summary of parameters of vitamin D in CSU

Outcome measurement

Pro

Cons

Results

References

Lower serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients than healthy controls

 

One study showed significantly higher levels of vitamin D in CSU patients than that of controls

Wu et al. [30]

One study showed no significant difference in vitamin D levels between CSU patients and that of controls

Lee et al. [22]

 

Twelve studies showed significant lower levels of vitamin D in CSU patients than that of controls

Thorp et al. [28]

Grzanka et al. [21]

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Abdel-Rehim et al. [18]

Movahedi et al. [23]

Woo et al. [29]

Rasool et al. [25]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

Dabas et al. [32]

Rather et al. [33]

Vitamin D insufficiency in CSU patients more than in controls

 

One study showed significantly higher prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency in controls than in CSU

Movahedi et al. [23]

 

Two studies showed no significant difference in the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency between CSU patients and controls

Grzanka et al. [21]

Boonpiyathad et al. [22] [31]

 

One study showed significant difference in the prevalence of vitamin D insufficiency between CSU patients and controls

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Vitamin D deficiency in CSU patients more than in controls

One study showed no significant difference in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency between CSU patients and controls

Thorp et al. [28]

 

Three studies showed significant difference in the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency between CSU patients and controls

Grzanka et al. [21]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

 

One study show significant difference in the proportion of critically low vitamin D levels in the CSU patients and in acute urticaria, atopic dermatitis, and healthy controls

Woo et al. [29]

Lower serum vitamin D levels between CSU and acute urticaria

 

One study showed no significant difference levels of vitamin D between CSU and acute urticaria patients

Lee et al. [22]

 

One study showed significantly lower levels of vitamin D in CSU than acute urticaria patients

Woo et al. [29]

Lower serum vitamin D levels between CSU and atopic dermatitis

 

One study showed significantly lower levels of vitamin D in CSU than atopic dermatitis

Woo et al. [29]

Lower serum vitamin D levels between CSU and allergic rhinitis

 

One study showed significantly lower levels of vitamin D in CSU than allergic rhinitis

Thorp et al. [28]

Low serum vitamin D levels and higher disease activity

 

One study reported a significant positive correlation between vitamin D levels and urticaria activity score

Movahedi et al. [23]

Six studies reported no association

Thorp et al. [28]

Abdel-Rehim et al. [18]

Grzanka et al. [21]

Rorie et al. [26]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

 

Three study reported significant negative association between vitamin D levels and urticaria activity score

One study reported significant negative association between vitamin D levels and urticaria severity score

Woo et al. [29]

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

Rather et al. [33]

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Low serum vitamin D levels and longer disease duration

Five studies reported no association

Thorp et al. [28]

Abdel-Rehim et al. [18]

Grzanka et al. [21]

Dabas et al. [32]

Rather et al. [33]

 

One studies reported significant negative association

Woo et al. [29]

Low serum vitamin D levels and high ESR

 

Two study reported significant correlation

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Low serum vitamin D levels and high CRP levels

One study reported no association

Grzanka et al. [21]

Low serum vitamin D levels and high IgE levels

 

One study reported negative association

Abdel-Rehim et al. [18]

Four studies reported no association

Movahedi et al. [23]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

Dabas et al. [32]

Low serum vitamin D levels and high IL-17 levels

 

One study reported negative association.

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Low serum vitamin D levels and TGF-β1

 

One study reported negative association

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Low serum vitamin D levels and thyroid autoantibodies testing

Two studies reported no association

Thorp et al. [28]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Low serum vitamin D levels and a positive ASST or APST

 

One study reported significant lower levels of vitamin D in patients with a positive APST

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

 

Three study reported significant lower levels of vitamin D in patients with a positive ASST.

Woo et al. [29]

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

Rather et al. [33]

Three studies reported no association between the ASST-positive and ASST-negative groups

Thorp et al. [28]

Grzanka et al. [21]

Dabas et al. [32]

APST, autologous plasma skin test; ASST, autologous serum skin test; CRP, C-reactive protein; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; TGF-β1, transforming growth factor β1

Degree of severity of serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients

The serum vitamin D levels were categorized into subgroups according to the vitamin D status. Serum 25(OH)D levels of > 30 ng/mL, 20–30 ng/mL, and < 20 ng/mL were defined as sufficiency, insufficiency, and deficiency, respectively; levels of < 10 ng/mL indicated a critically low or severe deficiency. The cut-point values to define vitamin D status in each study were very similar even though slightly different values were found in some studies (Table 3). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency was reported more commonly in the CSU patients (34.3–89.7%) than in the controls (0.0–68.9%) in 8 studies [21, 23, 24, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33]. Four of those studies reported statistically significant differences [21, 24, 29, 31].
Table 3

Comparison of reported degree severity of serum vitamin D levels in CSU patients and controls

Studies

Thorp et al. [28]

Chandrashekar et al. [20]

Grzanka et al. [21]

Movahedi et al. [23]

Woo et al. [29]

Cases

Allergic rhinitis

controls

Cases

Healthy controls

Cases

Healthy

controls

Cases

Healthy controls

Cases

Healthy controls

N

25

25

45

45

35

33

114

187

72

72

Vitamin D levels

29.4

(mean)

39.6

(mean)

12.7 ± 2.7

24.3 ± 13.5

26.0

(median)

31.1

(median)

15.8

22.6

11.86

(mean)

20.77

(mean)

Sufficiency

ND

ND

ND

11/45

(24.44%)

ND

ND

10

(8.8%)

49

(26.2%)

2

(2%)

15

(20%)

Insufficiency

ND

ND

ND

18/45

(40%)

11

(31.4%)

13

(39.4%)

18*

(15.8%)

31

(16.6%)

7

(10%)

20

(27%)

Deficiency

12

(48%)

7

(28%)

ND

16/45

(35.55%)

11*

(31.4%)

2

(6%)

86

(75.4%)

107

(57.2%)

28

(39%)

32

(45%)

Severe deficiency

ND

ND

ND

ND

1

(2.9%)

0

(0%)

ND

ND

35*

(49%)

5

(8%)

Definition

 Sufficiency

ND

> 30 ng/mL

≥ 30 ng/mL

ND

≥ 30 ng/mL

 Insufficiency

ND

Between 20 and 30 ng/mL

20–< 30 ng/mL

20–30 ng/mL

Between 20 and 29 ng/mL

 Deficiency

< 30 ng/mL

< 20 ng/mL

< 20 ng/mL

< 20 ng/mL

< 20 ng/mL

 Critically low/Severe deficiency

ND

ND

< 10 ng/mL

ND

< 10 ng/mL

Studies

Rasool et al. [25]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Nasiri-Kalmarzi et al. [14]

Rather et al. [33]

Cases

Healthy

controls

Cases

Healthy controls

Cases

Healthy controls

Case

Healthy controls

Case

Controls

N

147

130

60

40

58

45

110

110

110

110

Vitamin D levels

17.87

(mean)

27.65

(mean)

15.0

(median)

30.0

(median)

8.45

(median)

15.3

(median)

19.26 ± 1.26

(mean)

31.72 ± 7.14

(mean)

19.6 ± 6.9

(mean)

38.5 ± 6.7

(mean)

Sufficiency

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

23

(20.91%)

71

(64.54%)

Insufficiency

91.3%

63.84%

28%

45%

57*

(98.3%)

39

(86.7%)

58.02%

48.89%

17

(15.45%)

24

(21.82%)

Deficiency

55%*

0%

52*

(89.7%)

31

(68.9%)

70

(63.64%)

15

(13.64%)

Severe deficiency

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

ND

Definition

 Sufficiency

> 30 ng/mL

ND

> 30 µg/L

ND

> 30 ng/mL

 Insufficiency

20–30 ng/mL

> 20–< 30 ng/mL

< 30 µg/L

ND

20–30 ng/mL

 Deficiency

10–< 20 ng/mL

< 20 ng/mL

< 20 µg/L

ND

< 20 ng/mL

 Critically low/Severe deficiency

< 10 ng/mL

ND

ND

ND

ND

CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria; ND, not defined

* Significant difference compared to the control group

Other effects of vitamin D on CSU

The effects of vitamin D on CSU are summarized at Table 2. The studies also compared the serum vitamin D levels of the CSU patients with those of patients with other diseases, such as acute urticaria [22, 29], atopic dermatitis [29], and allergic rhinitis [28]. Vitamin D level was significantly lower in CSU patients than in atopic dermatitis and allergic rhinitis [28, 29]. Four out of 11 studies reported significant association between low serum vitamin D levels and high disease activity whereas seven studies did not find this significant association. Most studies demonstrated that there was no association between low serum vitamin D levels and disease duration [18, 21, 28, 32, 33]. Others reported a relationship between the serum vitamin D levels and other investigations, including erythrocyte sedimentation rate [20, 31], C-reactive protein [21], serum IgE [14, 18, 23, 24, 32], IL-17 [20], transforming growth factor-β1 [20], thyroid autoantibodies [24, 28], autologous serum skin test [14, 21, 28, 29, 33], and autologous plasma skin test [20]. It was shown that low serum vitamin D level was significantly associated with high levels of ESR, IgE, IL-17, and transforming growth factor-β1 [18, 20, 31].

Outcome of vitamin D supplementation on CSU patients

Seven studies (2 RCTs [26, 32], 3 case–control studies [24, 25, 31], 1 prospective study [19], and 1 case report [27]) were concerned with vitamin D supplementation in 587 CSU patients. The outcomes of the vitamin D supplementation were compared to baseline in 6 studies [19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 32] and to controls in 1 study [31].

The regimens of vitamin D supplementation in each study were reviewed and are summarized at Table 4. Four studies used vitamin D3 at dosages ranging from 2800 to 75,000 IU/week [24, 25, 26, 27], one study used vitamin D2 at a dosage of 140,000 IU/week [31], and another study did not define the form of vitamin D administered at a dosage of 50,000 IU/week [19]. Similarly, the form of vitamin D supplementation was also not defined in the RCT study but patients were categorized into three groups to receive low-dose (2000 IU/d), high-dose (60,000 IU/week), and without vitamin D supplementation, respectively [32]. The duration of the vitamin D supplementations ranged from 4 to 12 weeks. The serum vitamin D levels were evaluated in 4 studies and were reported as 25(OH)D [25, 26, 27, 31].
Table 4

Outcome of vitamin D supplement in CSU patients

Study, year

Study design

N

Enroll

Concomitant medications

Intervention

(Dose, type, duration,source)

Duration

Main outcome measurement

Vitamin D status (ng/mL)

Outcome

Before

End of treatment

Sindher et al. [27]

Case report

1

Chronic urticaria

Calcium citrate 800 mg/day

Fexofenadine

Aluminium/magnesium antacid

Vitamin D3 (Cholecalciferol 400 IU/day

8 weeks

ND

4.7

ND

Continued to have intermittent urticaria

Then increased to 2000 IU/day)

ND

 

ND

65

Complete resolution without antihistamine

Rorie et al. [26]

Prospective,double-blinded, randomized controlled trial

(single-center clinical study)

42

CSU receiving high dose vitamin D3 (4000 IU/day) supplementation

(n = 21)

Cetirizine

Ranitidine

Montelukast

Use for intolerable or uncontrolled symptoms

Prednisolone

Hydroxychloroquine

Vitamin D3 4,000 IU/day

12 weeks

USS

Vitamin D status

(mean ± SE)

Decrease total USS scores

(mean ± SE)

28.8 ± 2.2

56.0 ± 3.9

15.0 ± 2.9

(p = 0.02)

CSU receiving low dose vitamin D3 (600 IU/day) supplementation

(n = 21)

 

Vitamin D3 600 IU/day

37.1 ± 3.4

35.8 ± 2.3

24.1 ± 4.0

   

Significant decrease in total USS score in the high, but not low, vitamin D3 treatment group by week 12 (p = 0.02)

No correlation between 25(OH)D levels and USS score at baseline (r = 0.07, p = 0.65) or at week 12 (r = 0.13, p = 0.45)

The high vitamin D3 treatment group showed a decreased total USS score compared with the low vitamin D3 treatment group, but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.052)

Subjects in the high vitamin D3 treatment group reported decrease body distribution of hives on an average day (p = 0.033), decrease body distribution of hives on the worst day (p = 0.0085), and decrease number of days with hives (p = 0.03) compared with subjects in the low vitamin D3 treatment group.

Study, year

Study design

N

Enroll

Concomitant

medications

Intervention (Dose, type, duration, source)

Duration

Main outcome measurement

Vitamin D status

(ng/mL)

Outcome

Before

End of treatment

Rasool et al. [25]

Randomized case–control study

147

CSU

Any vitamin D levels (serum 25(OH)D) from

Group 1

Severe deficiency

Vitamin D levels < 10 ng/mL

Group 2

Deficient levels

Vitamin D levels

10–< 20 ng/mL

Group 3

Insufficient levels

Vitamin D levels

20–30 ng/mL

Group 4

Sufficient levels

Vitamin D levels

> 30 ng/mL)

Then randomized to

Sub-group A (n = 48)

sub-group B

(n = 42)

Sub-group C (n = 57)

 

6 weeks

VAS

5-D itch score

Vitamin D status

(mean ± SEM)

VAS score

(mean ± SEM)

5-D itch score

(mean)

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Sub-group A

Sub-group A

Sub-group A

Sub-group A

None

Vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) 60,000 IU/week for 4 weeks

16.98 ± 1.43

56.74 ± 3.76

(p < 0 .0001)

6.7 ± 0.043

5.2 ± 0.70

(p = 0.0088)

14.5 ± 0.72

12.06 ± 1.10

(p = 0.0072)

Sub-group B

Sub-group B

Sub-group B

Sub-group B

Hydroxyzine

25 mg/day for 6 weeks

Corticosteroids

(deflazacort)

6 mg/day for 6 weeks

None

17.04 ± 1.54

16.44 ± 1.50

6.6 ± 0.42

3.3 ± 0.50

(p < 0.0001)

13.9 ± 0.77

8.1 ± 1.13

(p < 0.001)

Sub-group C

Sub-group C

Sub-group C

Sub-group C

Hydroxyzine

25 mg/day for 6 weeks

Corticosteroids

6 mg/day for 6 weeks

Vitamin D3 60,000 IU/week for 4 weeks

18.95 ± 1.42

41.73 ± 2.85 (p < 0.0001)

6.68 ± 0.40

1.86 ± 0.39

(p < 0.0001)

13.9 ± 0.68

5.01 ± 0.94

(< 0.0001)

  

Significantly decreased in VAS in every groups

Significantly decreased in 5D itch score in every groups

Improvement in the CSU symptoms in patients with vitamin D3 as monotherapy

Better improvement of symptoms and quality of life in combinatorial therapy group than standard therapeutic regimen group

Significant difference in VAS in subgroup A compared to subgroup B and C (p = 0.016 and p < 0.0001, respectively)

Significant difference in VAS in subgroup C compare to subgroup B (p = 0.0203)

Significant difference in 5-D score in subgroup A compared to subgroup B and C (p = 0.0116 and p < 0.0001, respectively)

Significant difference in 5-D score in subgroup C compared to subgroup B (p = 0.0382)

130

Healthy control

None

None

6 weeks

Vitamin D levels

Group 1

No change in serum 25(OH)D levels

7.310 ± 0.52

5.899 ± 0.28

Group 2

15.26 ± 0.47

16.96 ± 1.26

Group 3

23.98 ± 0.46

23.15 ± 0.95

Group 4

47.78 ± 2.23

49.18 ± 2.97

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Prospective case–control study

57

cases

CSU

Serum 25(OH)D < 30ug/L

None

Vitamin D3 300,000 IU/month

12 weeks

UAS4‡‡

CU-Q2oL

ND

ND

UAS4

(median(min–max))

CU-Q2oL

(median(min–max))

Before

After

Before

After

21

(0–42.0)

6

(0–21.0)

(p < 0.001)

38

(6.5–115.2)

10.8

(0–43.4)

(p < 0.001)

Significant improvements in UAS4 and CU-Q2oL

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Prospective case–control study

50

cases

CSU

Serum 25(OH)D < 30 ng/mL

(vitamin D supplement group)

Non-sedative antihistamine

Ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) 20,000 IU/day

6 weeks

UAS7

DLQI

13 (8–29) median (min–max)

40 (28–62) median (min–max)

UAS7

DLQI scores

Before

After

Before

After

27

(6–38)

15

(2–33)

13

(4–31)

6

(1–20)

10 controls

CSU

Serum 25(OH)D ≥ 30 ng/ml

(non-vitamin D supplement group)

ND

None

6 weeks

UAS7

DLQI

37 (33–52)

median

(min–max)

38 (33–52)

median

(min–max)

26

(18–42)

26

(16–44)

12

(5–28)

14

(3–27)

Significant improvements in UAS7 and DLQI scores in the vitamin D supplement group compared with the non-vitamin D supplement group

Significant improvement of the median UAS7 score in the vitamin D supplement group than in the non-vitamin D supplement group

Significantly improvement of the median DLQI score in the vitamin D supplement compared with the non-vitamin D supplement group

None of the patients in the vitamin D supplement group were symptom-free at the optimal vitamin D levels.

Ariaee et al. [19]

Prospective study

20

CSU

Serum vitamin D concentration < 10 ng/mL

ND

Vitamin D 50,000 unit/week

8 weeks

USS

DLQI

ND

ND

USS (mean ± SD)

DLQI scores (mean ± SD)

Before

After

Before

After

235 ± 13.9

11.2 ± 9.6

10.8 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 4.8

Significant reduction in USS after vitamin D supplement

Improvement of DLQI (55%) after vitamin D supplement

Increase FOXP3 gene expression and downregulation of IL-10, TGF-beta and FOXP3, IL-17 after vitamin D supplement

Dabas et al. [32]

Randomized controlled trial

200

CSU

Serum 25(OH)D < 30 nmol/L

Levocetirizine 10 mg/day

Group A

Vitamin D 2000 IU/day

Group B

Vitamin D 60,000 IU/week

Group C

None

12 weeks

UAS4

ND

ND

UAS4 (mean)

Before

After 6 weeks

After 12 weeks

Group A

11.8 ± 7.6

6.6 ± 6.0

5.3 ± 5.2

Group B

13.0 ± 8.0

6.4 ± 5.0

4.2 ± 3.5

Group C

12.9 ± 7.03

8.0 ± 5.7

6.1 ± 4.8

No significant difference in mean UAS4 in the 3 groups after 12 weeks of vitamin D replacement

Vitamin D replacement decreased the severity in most patients.

25(OH)D, 25-hydoxyvitamin D; 5-D itch score, 5-dimension itch score; CSU, chronic spontaneous urticaria; CU-Q2oL, Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; IL, interleukin; TGF, transforming growth factor; ND, not defined; UAS, urticaria activity score; USS score, the Urticaria Symptom Severity Score; VAS, visual analogue scale

‡‡UAS4 (the Urticaria Activity Score over 4 days; (scale 0–6) calculated as the sum of daily average morning and evening scores for itch severity (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, severe) and number of hives (0, none; 1, < 20 hives; 2, 20–50 hives; and 3, > 50 hives)

The parameters of treatment outcomes varied among the studies; they comprised the urticaria activity score over 4 days (UAS4) [24, 32], urticaria activity score over 7 days (UAS7) [31], dermatology life quality index [19, 31], chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire [24], visual analogue scale [25], 5-dimension itch score [25], and urticaria symptom severity score [19, 26] (Table 5). Four studies reported a significant reduction in disease activity after high dose vitamin D supplementation (vitamin D2, 140,000 IU/week; vitamin D3, 60,000–75,000 IU/week; and unknown form of vitamin D, 50,000 unit/week) [19, 24, 25, 31]. One case report showed that treatment with a low vitamin D dosage (400 IU/d) for 2 months did not reduce urticaria activity. However, complete resolution without antihistamine was demonstrated at a higher dosage (2000 IU/d) [27]. Another study reported a significant reduction in disease activity after high-dose vitamin D supplementation (4000 IU/d) compared to low-dose vitamin D supplementation (600 IU/d) [26]. Ariaee et al. reported that the transforming growth factor-β, IL-10 and IL-17 expressions were decreased after 8 weeks of vitamin D supplementation [19]. In addition, forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) expression, a clinical determinant of Treg, increased after treatment [19]. In the RCT study, either low-dose or high-dose of vitamin D supplementation could reduce disease severity but there was no significant difference in the mean UAS4 among the three groups after 12 weeks of supplementation [32].
Table 5

Summarized of treatment regimens and outcome of vitamin D supplementation

N

Sindher et al. [27]**

Rorie et al. [26]††

Rasool et al. [25]§§

Oguz Topal et al. [24]

Boonpiyathad et al. [31]

Ariaee et al. [19]

Dabas et al. [32]

1

21

21

48

57

57

50

20

200

Intervention

Vitamin D3

400 IU/day

Vitamin D3

2000 IU/day

Vitamin D3

4000 IU/day

Vitamin D3

600 IU/day

Vitamin D3

60,000 IU/week

Vitamin D3 60,000 IU/week,

4 weeks

Hydroxyzine

25 mg/day, 6 weeks

Corticosteroid

6 mg/day, 6 weeks

Vitamin D3

300,000 IU/month

Vitamin D2

20,000 IU/day

Vitamin D

(unknown form)

50,000 unit/week

Vitamin D (unknown form)

Group A

Vitamin D 2000 IU/day

Group B

Vitamin D 60,000 IU/week

Group C

None

Duration

8 weeks

ND

12 weeks

12 weeks

4 weeks

4 weeks

12 weeks

6 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

Vitamin D status (ng/mL)

Before treatment

4.7

ND

28.8 ± 2.2

37.1 ± 3.4

16.98 ± 1.43

18.95 ± 1.42

ND

13 (8–29)

median (min–max)

ND

ND

End of treatment

ND

65

56.0 ± 3.9

35.8 ± 2.3

56.74 ± 3.76

(p < 0 .0001)

41.73 ± 2.85

(p < 0.0001)

ND

40 (28–62)

median (min–max)

ND

ND

Outcome

Continued to have intermittent urticaria

Complete resolution without antihistamine

Decrease total USS scores

(mean ± SE)

VAS score

(mean ± SEM)

UAS4

(median(min–max))

UAS7

USS

(mean ± SD)

UAS4 (mean)

15.0 ± 2.9

(p = 0.02)

24.1 ± 4.0

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After 6 weeks

After 12 weeks

6.7 ± 0.04

5.2 ± 0.70

p = 0.009

6.68 ± 0.40

1.86 ± 0.39

p < 0.0001

21

(0–42.0)

6

(0–21.0)

p < 0.001

27

(6–38)

15

(2–33)

235 ± 13.9

11.2 ± 9.6

GroupA

11.8 ± 7.6

6.6 ± 6.0

5.3 ± 5.2

5-D itch score

(mean)

CU-Q2oL

(median(min–max))

DLQI scores

DLQI scores

(mean ± SD)

Group B

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

Before

After

13.0 ± 8.0

6.4 ± 5.0

4.2 ± 3.5

14.5 ± 0.72

12.06 ± 1.10

p = 0.007

13.9 ± 0.68

5.01 ± 0.94

p < 0.0001

38 (6.5–115.2)

10.8

(0–43.4)

p < 0.001

13

(4–31)

6

(1–20)

10.8 ± 1.6

0.9 ± 4.8

Group C

12.9 ± 7.03

8.0 ± 5.7

6.1 ± 4.8

5-D itch score, 5-dimension itch score; CU-Q2oL, Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire; DLQI, Dermatology Life Quality Index; ND, not defined; UAS, urticaria activity score; USS score, the Urticaria Symptom Severity Score; VAS, visual analogue scale

**CSU patients in Sindher et al. was treated with low dose vitamin D3 without response, then the patient was treated with higher dosage of vitamin D3 [26]

††CSU patients in Rorie et al. were randomized to vitamin D3 4000 IU/day or 600 IU/day [25]

§§CSU patients in Rasool et al. were randomized to vitamin D3 60,0000 IU/week alone or vitamin D3 60,000 IU/week and hydroxyzine 25 mg/day and corticosteroid 6 mg/day [24]

Discussion

Two recent meta-analysis regarding the association between vitamin D and urticaria have been published in 2018. Tsai et al. and Wang et al. showed that the prevalence of vitamin D was significantly higher in CU patients than that of controls. [34, 35] Similar to those two meta-analysis, 12 out of 14 studies in our study showed significantly lower levels of serum vitamin D in CSU patients than in the controls [14, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 33]. Only Wu et al. found significantly higher levels of vitamin D in the CSU patients than in the UK general population as a control group [30]. However, that study compared CSU patients in Southampton General Hospital to the UK general population rather than healthy controls in Southampton; a variation of serum vitamin D levels in different regions of UK was reported [36]. Lee et al. [22] reported no statistical significance between the vitamin D levels in pediatric CSU patients and the controls, which was similar to a study by Tsai et al. [34]. Nevertheless, it should be noted that our study provides additional information regarding associations between vitamin D and urticaria than those of the two studies. Data regarding (1) types of serum vitamin D (2) outcome of vitamin D supplementation after treating with different dosages, types and duration of vitamin D are also added in this study.

Potential factors determining vitamin D status include oral vitamin D intake, sun exposure, latitude, season, Fitzpatrick skin type, time spent outdoors, sun exposure practices, body mass index (BMI), physical activity, alcohol intake, and genetic polymorphism [37]. Higher serum vitamin D levels can be observed with prolonged sun exposure, increased time spent outdoors, the summer season, living in lower latitudes, increased physical activity, moderate alcohol intake, and rs7041 gene polymorphism [37]. In contrast, lower serum vitamin D levels can be observed with darker skin, female gender, higher BMI, excessive alcohol intake, and rs4588 gene polymorphism [37]. It has been reported that vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is a pandemic problem. The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency has been estimated to be 30%-60% of children and adults worldwide. Areas that had high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency in the general population were Europe (92%), Middle East (90%), Asia (45–98%), and Canada (61%). The most common cause of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency is an insufficient exposure to sun-light as diet with fortified vitamin D are few. For example, in Middle East, vitamin D deficiency is found to strongly correlate with well-covering clothes [38, 39].

Vitamin D has been shown to be linked to other skin diseases. Low serum 25(OH)D levels have been reported in severe atopic dermatitis [40], psoriasis [41], vitiligo [42], systemic sclerosis [43], severe alopecia areata [44], severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [45], and acne [46] and also associated with an increased risk of cutaneous bacterial infections in vitro [47]. However, no studies in our review reported the cut-off serum vitamin D levels that might be associated with the development of CSU.

As to vitamin D supplementation, both vitamins D2 and D3 are commonly. Current dietary reference intakes for vitamin D are 400 IU per day in infancy, 600 IU per day in the 1–70 year age group, and 800 IU per day for individuals aged over 70 [48]. Vitamin D2 is reported to be less effective than vitamin D3 in raising total serum vitamin D levels, but less toxic than vitamin D3 when given in large amounts [2]. The variations in the vitamin D supplementation regimens in the studies might have led to different outcomes.

Six studies showed that a high dosage of vitamin D treatment resulted in a significant reduction in CSU activity. [19, 24, 25, 26, 27, 31] The other study reported that vitamin D supplement 2000 IU/day and 60,000 IU/week decreased disease activity in most CSU patients [32].

Among the various regimens, higher dosages of vitamin D (vitamin D3 of at least 28,000 IU/week for 4–12 weeks, or vitamin D2 of 140,000 IU/week for 6 weeks) were reported to be effective. Although the available studies were relatively scarce, CSU patients with low serum vitamin D levels at baseline tended to show an improvement after receiving high dose vitamin D supplementation. Vitamin D has high safety margin. The tolerable upper intake levels are now 4000–10,000 IU/d for adults and the elderly, and lower for infants and young children [48, 49]. According to our systematic review, even though there were not reported any adverse effect during vitamin D therapy, high dosage of vitamin D use should be concerned about safety. Measurement of serum vitamin D levels may be useful for safety monitoring and determining relationship to the treatment outcome, and it should be concerned about potential adverse effect at serum 25(OH)D levels greater than 50 ng/ml (125 nmol/liter) [48].

Vitamin D supplementation was reported for other skin diseases. A meta-analysis by Kim et al. of 4 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials showed that the SCORAD index and EASI score of atopic dermatitis patients decreased significantly after vitamin D supplementation [50]. Lim et al. compared the vitamin D levels of patients with and without acne in a case–control study combined with a randomized controlled trial [46]. Improvements in inflammatory lesions were noted after vitamin D supplementation in 39 acne patients with 25(OH)D deficiency. Abou–Raya et al. randomized 267 patients with SLE to receive either vitamin D3 (2000 IU daily) or a placebo. At 12 months of treatment, there was a significant decrease in the pro-inflammatory cytokines levels (i.e., IL-1, IL-6, IL-18 and TNF-α), anti-dsDNA, C4, fibrinogen, von Willebrand factor, and disease activity scores of the treatment group compared to the placebo group [51].

This systematic review has some limitations. First, there are small numbers of relevant studies. Second, few studies are RCTs; and variety in the individualized vitamin D supplementation regimens contribute to unsettle treatment results.

Conclusions

Most studies showed that CSU patients had significantly lower serum vitamin D levels than the controls [14, 18, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 31, 32, 33]. However, this relationship does not prove causation. Data from a limited number of studies showed that the responders tended to be CSU patients with low serum vitamin D at baseline who received high-dose vitamin D supplementation regimens. For recalcitrant CSU patients with low serum vitamin D levels, a high dose of vitamin D supplements for 4–12 weeks may be used as an adjunctive treatment. Well-designed randomized placebo-controlled studies should be performed to determine the cut-off levels for vitamin D supplementation and treatment outcomes.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

SA performed literature search of electronic databases. KK and SA screened articles for eligibility based on the inclusion criterion and assessed the risk of bias. PT and SA reviewed and extracted information from the eligible full-text articles. KK, PT, and LC contributed to the analysis of the results and to the writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge Dr. Saowalak Hunnangkul, Ph.D. Biostatistician, for assistance with the statistical analyses.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by Siriraj Institutional Review Board, protocol No. 586/2560(Exempt).

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R, Bindslev-Jensen C, Brzoza Z, Canonica GW, et al. The EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/WAO Guideline for the definition, classification, diagnosis, and management of urticaria: the 2013 revision and update. Allergy. 2014;69:868–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rosen CJ. Clinical practice. Vitamin D insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:248–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ko JA, Lee BH, Lee JS, Park HJ. Effect of UV-B exposure on the concentration of vitamin D2 in sliced shiitake mushroom (Lentinus edodes) and white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus). J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56:3671–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deluca HF, Cantorna MT. Vitamin D: its role and uses in immunology. FASEB J. 2001;15:2579–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yu C, Fedoric B, Anderson PH, Lopez AF, Grimbaldeston MA. Vitamin D(3) signalling to mast cells: a new regulatory axis. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43:41–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hata TR, Kotol P, Boguniewicz M, Taylor P, Paik A, Jackson M, et al. History of eczema herpeticum is associated with the inability to induce human beta-defensin (HBD)-2, HBD-3 and cathelicidin in the skin of patients with atopic dermatitis. Br J Dermatol. 2010;163:659–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kongsbak M, von Essen MR, Levring TB, Schjerling P, Woetmann A, Odum N, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein controls T cell responses to vitamin D. BMC Immunol. 2014;15:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cheng HM, Kim S, Park GH, Chang SE, Bang S, Won CH, et al. Low vitamin D levels are associated with atopic dermatitis, but not allergic rhinitis, asthma, or IgE sensitization, in the adult Korean population. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;133:1048–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Di Filippo P, Scaparrotta A, Rapino D, Cingolani A, Attanasi M, Petrosino MI, et al. Vitamin D supplementation modulates the immune system and improves atopic dermatitis in children. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2015;166:91–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baroni E, Biffi M, Benigni F, Monno A, Carlucci D, Carmeliet G, et al. VDR-dependent regulation of mast cell maturation mediated by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Leukoc Biol. 2007;81:250–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Powe CE, Evans MK, Wenger J, Zonderman AB, Berg AH, Nalls M, et al. Vitamin D-binding protein and vitamin D status of black Americans and white Americans. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1991–2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang J, Chalmers MJ, Stayrook KR, Burris LL, Wang Y, Busby SA, et al. DNA binding alters coactivator interaction surfaces of the intact VDR-RXR complex. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2011;18:556–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bizzaro G, Antico A, Fortunato A, Bizzaro N. Vitamin D and autoimmune diseases: is vitamin D receptor (VDR) polymorphism the culprit? Isr Med Assoc J. 2017;19:438–43.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nasiri-Kalmarzi R, Abdi M, Hosseini J, Babaei E, Mokarizadeh A, Vahabzadeh Z. Evaluation of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 pathway in patients with chronic urticaria. QJM. 2018;111(3):161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abuzeid WM, Akbar NA, Zacharek MA. Vitamin D and chronic rhinitis. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;12:13–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Osborne NJ, Ukoumunne OC, Wake M, Allen KJ. Prevalence of eczema and food allergy is associated with latitude in Australia. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;129:865–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Searing DA, Leung DY. Vitamin D in atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic diseases. Immunol Allergy Clin N Am. 2010;30:397–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abdel-Rehim AS, Sheha DS, Mohamed NA. Vitamin D level among Egyptian patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria and its relation to severity of the disease. Egypt J Immunol. 2014;21:85–90.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ariaee N, Zarei S, Mohamadi M, Jabbari F. Amelioration of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria in treatment with vitamin D supplement. Clin Mol Allergy. 2017;15:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Chandrashekar L, Rajappa M, Munisamy M, Ananthanarayanan PH, Thappa DM, Arumugam B. 25-Hydroxy vitamin D levels in chronic urticaria and its correlation with disease severity from a tertiary care centre in South India. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2014;52:115–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grzanka A, Machura E, Mazur B, Misiolek M, Jochem J, Kasperski J, et al. Relationship between vitamin D status and the inflammatory state in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Inflamm (Lond). 2014;11:2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lee SJ, Ha EK, Jee HM, Lee KS, Lee SW, Kim MA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of urticaria with a focus on chronic urticaria in children. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res. 2017;9:212–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Movahedi M, Tavakol M, Hirbod-Mobarakeh A, Gharagozlou M, Aghamohammadi A, Tavakol Z, et al. Vitamin D deficiency in chronic idiopathic urticaria. Iran J Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015;14:222–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Oguz Topal I, Kocaturk E, Gungor S, Durmuscan M, Sucu V, Yildirmak S. Does replacement of vitamin D reduce the symptom scores and improve quality of life in patients with chronic urticaria? J Dermatol Treat. 2016;27:163–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rasool R, Masoodi KZ, Shera IA, Yosuf Q, Bhat IA, Qasim I, et al. Chronic urticaria merits serum vitamin D evaluation and supplementation; a randomized case control study. World Allergy Organ J. 2015;8:15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rorie A, Goldner WS, Lyden E, Poole JA. Beneficial role for supplemental vitamin D3 treatment in chronic urticaria: a randomized study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;112(4):376–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sindher SB, Jariwala S, Gilbert J, Rosenstreich D. Resolution of chronic urticaria coincident with vitamin D supplementation. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;109:359–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Thorp WA, Goldner W, Meza J, Poole JA. Reduced vitamin D levels in adult subjects with chronic urticaria. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126:413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Woo YR, Jung KE, Koo DW, Lee JS. Vitamin D as a marker for disease severity in chronic urticaria and its possible role in pathogenesis. Ann Dermatol. 2015;27:423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wu CH, Eren E, Ardern-Jones MR, Venter C. Association between micronutrient levels and chronic spontaneous urticaria. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:926167.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Boonpiyathad T, Pradubpongsa P, Sangasapaviriya A. Vitamin D supplements improve urticaria symptoms and quality of life in chronic spontaneous urticaria patients: a prospective case-control study. Dermato-Endocrinology. 2016;8:983685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Dabas G, Kumaran MS, Prasad D. Vitamin D in chronic urticaria: unrevealing the enigma. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177:47–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rather S, Keen A, Sajad P. Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D in chronic urticaria and its association with disease activity: a case control study. Indian Dermatol Online J. 2018;9:170–4.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tsai TY, Huang YC. Vitamin D deficiency in patients with chronic and acute urticaria: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;79:573–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang X, Li X, Shen Y, Wang X. The association between serum vitamin D levels and urticaria: a meta-analysis of observational studies. G Ital Dermatol Venereol. 2018;153:389–95.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hypponen E, Power C. Hypovitaminosis D in British adults at age 45 y: nationwide cohort study of dietary and lifestyle predictors. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:860–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kechichian E, Ezzedine K. Vitamin D and the skin: an update for dermatologists. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2018;19:223–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Holick MF. The vitamin D deficiency pandemic: approaches for diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2017;18:153–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    van Schoor NM, Lips P. Worldwide vitamin D status. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:671–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Heine G, Hoefer N, Franke A, Nothling U, Schumann RR, Hamann L, et al. Association of vitamin D receptor gene polymorphisms with severe atopic dermatitis in adults. Br J Dermatol. 2013;168:855–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bergler-Czop B, Brzezinska-Wcislo L. Serum vitamin D level—the effect on the clinical course of psoriasis. Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2016;33:445–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Upala S, Sanguankeo A. Low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are associated with vitiligo: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2016;32:181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Giuggioli D, Colaci M, Cassone G, Fallahi P, Lumetti F, Spinella A, et al. Serum 25-OH vitamin D levels in systemic sclerosis: analysis of 140 patients and review of the literature. Clin Rheumatol. 2017;36:583–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Aksu Cerman A, Sarikaya Solak S, Kivanc Altunay I. Vitamin D deficiency in alopecia areata. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170:1299–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Wu PW, Rhew EY, Dyer AR, Dunlop DD, Langman CB, Price H, et al. 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cardiovascular risk factors in women with systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1387–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lim SK, Ha JM, Lee YH, Lee Y, Seo YJ, Kim CD, et al. Comparison of vitamin D levels in patients with and without acne: a case-control study combined with a randomized controlled trial. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:0161162.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Muehleisen B, Bikle DD, Aguilera C, Burton DW, Sen GL, Deftos LJ, et al. PTH/PTHrP and vitamin D control antimicrobial peptide expression and susceptibility to bacterial skin infection. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:135ra66-ra66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Ross AC, Manson JE, Abrams SA, Aloia JF, Brannon PM, Clinton SK, et al. The 2011 report on dietary reference intakes for calcium and vitamin D from the Institute of Medicine: what clinicians need to know. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:53–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pludowski P, Holick MF, Grant WB, Konstantynowicz J, Mascarenhas MR, Haq A, et al. Vitamin D supplementation guidelines. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2018;175:125–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Kim MJ, Kim SN, Lee YW, Choe YB, Ahn KJ. Vitamin D status and efficacy of vitamin D supplementation in atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. 2016;8:789.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Abou-Raya A, Abou-Raya S, Helmii M. The effect of vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory and hemostatic markers and disease activity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:265–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Papapit Tuchinda
    • 1
  • Kanokvalai Kulthanan
    • 1
  • Leena Chularojanamontri
    • 1
  • Sittiroj Arunkajohnsak
    • 1
  • Sutin Sriussadaporn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand
  2. 2.Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj HospitalMahidol UniversityBangkokThailand

Personalised recommendations