Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 12:510 | Cite as

Predictors of isolated systolic hypertension among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in Jimma University Specialized Hospital, Southwest Ethiopia

  • Baye DagnewEmail author
  • Yigizie Yeshaw
Open Access
Research note
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

Objectives

Systolic blood pressure rise among T2DM patients was main risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Objective of this study was to identify predictors of isolated systolic hypertension among T2DM patients at Jimma University Specialized Hospital, 2016. We conducted cross sectional study using simple random sampling and interviewer administered questionnaire. Isolated systolic hypertension is SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and < 90 mmHg. Data entered and analyzed using Epi Data and SPSS respectively. Predictor factor was declared at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 315 T2DM took part. Prevalence of ISH was 27.6% [95% CI (22.7, 32.5%)]. One hundred sixty and two (51.4%) patients were males with mean age of 54.1 from 22 to 87 years. Male sex [AOR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.21–4.72, p = 0.012], unemployment [AOR = 3.22, 95% CI 1.48–7.03, p = 0.003], age of 47–55 [AOR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.03–6.70, p = 0.044], single [AOR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.13–4.51, p = 0.021], ≤ Grade 8 [AOR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.10–7.85, p = 0.03] and income (ETB) 501–800 [AOR = 21.9, 95% CI 7.62–63.1, p < 0.001], 801–1500 [AOR = 5.78, 95% CI 2.55–13.1, p < 0.001] and > 1500 [AOR = 4.23, 95% CI 1.74–10.30, p = 0.001] were significant factors of ISH. The health sector has to establish preventive strategies for ISH among T2DM patients by giving special attention to predictor factors.

Keywords

Cross-sectional Hypertension Isolated systolic hypertension T2DM Ethiopia 

Abbreviations

AOR

adjusted odds ratio

BMI

body mass index

CI

confidence interval

COR

crude odds ratio

DBP

diastolic blood pressure

DM

diabetes mellitus

EPI Data

Epidemiological Data

FPG

fasting plasma glucose

HTN

hypertension

IDH

isolated diastolic hypertension

ISH

isolated systolic hypertension

JNC

Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection. Evaluation and treatment of high blood pressure

JUSH

Jimma University Specialized Hospital

SBP

systolic blood pressure

SPSS

Statistical Package for Social Sciences

Introduction

Hypertension is the common comorbidity of diabetes mellitus (DM) [1]. It is prevalent in developing countries [2], major risk for coronary disease [3]. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is common form of hypertension bringing morbidity and mortality mainly among elderly [4]. ISH is SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg. According to JNC-VI; grade 1 ISH (SBP < 160 mmHg), grade 2 (SBP < 180 mmHg) and grade 3 (SBP ≥ 180 mmHg) [5]. Raised SBP among T2DM patients was the major risk factor for cardiovascular diseases [6]. Diabetes patients experienced high vascular resistance explained by vascular remodeling and increased fluid volume related to hyperglycemia [7]. Vascular problems are explained by hypertension among T2DM [8].

Decreasing of SBP by 10 mmHg lead to 12% reductions of diabetes complications [9, 10]. SBP increases after 50–60 years due to age-related changes in vasculature [11]. ISH mainly affects those 50 years and above [12]. Arterial stiffness is accountable for pathogenesis of hypertension [13, 14]. It is common in DM patients caused by endothelial dysfunction leading to inflammation [15, 16]. ISH is associated with ageing leading to morbidity and mortality due to cerebrovascular disturbance [4]. There was 85.6% prevalence of hypertension among DM patients in Benghazi [17]. ISH ranges from 20.3% in primary care patients to 35% in general population [18]. A study in Saudi revealed 7.6% of ISH among adults associated with education, obesity, DM, and dyslipidemia [19]. Prevalence of 43.6% was reported in Nigerian adults associated with increased age [20]. ISH is common in obese, males, low education level and smokers [21]. A study in Ghana revealed 37.4% ISH which was predicted by patient’s age [22]. In DM patients, ISH is associated with older age, male sex, DM duration and overweight [17]. For 5th–6th decades of life SBP and DBP increased with age and onwards SBP continues to increase [23, 24]. There were limited studies globally and none was found in Ethiopia on predictors of ISH. So this study aimed to identify predictors of ISH among T2DM, to add information to scientific community and put baseline for Ethiopia.

Main text

Patients and methods

Study setting

We conducted the study at Jimma University Specialized Hospital (JUSH), Jimma, 352 km away from Addis Ababa. We found 1853 T2DM patients (source population) in medical records at JUSH immediately before starting data collection of which 850 patients were accessible during data collection.

Study design: Institution-based cross-sectional study design was employed.

Study period: It was conducted from April 01 to July 30, 2016.

Sample size determination and sampling technique

Sample size was calculated using Raosoft sample size calculator [25] assuming 95% level of confidence, 5% margin of error, population of 1853 and p = 37.4% [22]. We had 302 samples and after adding 5% oversampling to account for any unpredictable events final sample size was 318. Computer generated simple random sampling was used to select patients using their medical registration number.

Eligibility criteria

All T2DM patients aged ≥ 20 years who were present during study period were included whereas those T2DM patients who were severely ill and pregnant women were excluded from the study.

Variables of the study

Dependent variable: Isolated systolic hypertension.

Independent variables: Age, sex, residence, marital status, lifetime khat chewing, lifetime cigarette smoking, lifetime alcohol drink, income, educational level, treatment options for diabetes, BMI, duration of DM, Fasting plasma glucose, occupation,

Operational definitions

Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH): SBP ≥ 140 mmHg and DBP < 90 mmHg [5, 26].

Hypertension (HTN): SBP and/or DBP of 140/90 mmHg or greater. The 2007 ESH/ESC recommended two distinct BP targets; 140/90 in low moderate risk hypertensive and 130/80 mmHg in high-risk hypertensive [27].

Isolated diastolic hypertension (IDH): DBP ≥ 90 mmHg and SBP < 140 mmHg.

Mean arterial pressure (MAP): The sum of DBP and one-third of the pulse pressure. MAP ranges 70–106.7 mmHg for average adults.

Pulse pressure (PP): The difference between systolic and diastolic pressure which ranges from 30 to 50 mmHg in average adults.

Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) level: Plasma glucose level when expressed in mg/dl of blood which is measured by taking blood sample from a person who was not taking anything orally for at least 8-h prior to taking the blood sample.

Body mass index: A person with BMI of < 18.5 kg/m2, 18.5–24.9 kg/m2, and > 24.9 kg/m2 is considered as underweight, normoweight and overweight respectively.

Rural residence Settling in country side outside of big cities or towns in Ethiopia are referred as rural residents whereas those living in big cities (like Jimma town) were urban residents [28].

Lifetime khat chewing Use of Khat at least once in an individual’s lifetime [29].

Lifetime cigarette smoking Use of cigarette smoke at least once in an individual’s lifetime [30].

Lifetime alcohol drink Drinking of alcohol beverage at least once in an individual’s lifetime [31].

Hypoglycaemia An event during which typical symptoms of hypoglycemia are accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration ≤ 70 mg/dl [32].

Data collection instrument and procedure

A pre-tested (17 T2DM patients at Shenen Gibe Hospital.) interviewer administered questionnaire was used to collect data. Questionnaire was adapted from previous published articles [3, 7, 10, 11, 13, 22, 33, 34, 35], prepared in English and translated to Amharic and retranslated to English by another person (see Additional file 1). Four data collectors and two supervisors participated in data collection. Data were extracted from patient charts. Fasting plasma glucose was determined using glucometer.

Blood pressure was measured in sitting position. The arm which was used for BP measurement was supported on flat table and using mercury sphygmomanometer BP cuff with the appropriate cuff size that covers two-thirds of the arm. Before measurement, participants were asked to rest for at least 5 min and if they were taking any caffeinated beverages they were rested for 30 min. Two consecutive measurements had been taken in 5 min gap before noon and average was taken for each.

Data quality management/control

Orientation was given for supervisors and data collectors about content of tool, data extraction and interview technique, ethical issues and measurement techniques for 6 h before starting data collection. Handy supervision and completeness of questionnaire were done by supervisors and principal investigator on daily basis.

Data processing and analysis

Epi Data-3.1 and SPSS-21 were used for data entry and analysis respectively. Crude association of independent variables with ISH was performed at p < 0.2. Variables in bivariable analysis with p < 0.2 were candidates for multivariable logistic regression. Both crude odds ratio (COR) and adjusted odds ratio (AOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed to demonstrate strength of association. In multivariable logistic regression, variables with p < 0.05 were declared as statistically significant. The null hypothesis was rejected if p > 0.05, CI includes 1 and if OR is 1.

Results

Sociodemographic and clinical records of study participants

Three hundred fifteen T2DM patients participated in the study. The mean age of study participants was 54.1 (± 11.96) ranging from 22 to 87 years. One hundred sixty and two (51.4%) study participants were males, 165 (52.4%) individuals were Muslim. Two hundred and one (63.8%) respondents were ≤ grade 8. Sixty-three (20%) individuals had encountered episodes of hypoglycemia. Two hundred and ten patients (66.7%) relied on oral hypoglycemic agents as treatment option for T2DM. Fasting plasma glucose was 126 mg/dl and above among 216 (68.6%) of patients (Table 1).
Table 1

Sociodemographic and clinical profiles of study participants (n = 315), Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016

Variable

Categories

Frequency

Percent

Age (in years)

22–46

81

25.7

47–55

84

26.7

56–62

81

25.7

63–87

69

21.9

Sex

Male

162

51.4

Female

153

48.6

Religion

Orthodox

117

37.1

Muslim

165

52.4

Protestant

21

6.7

Catholic

12

3.8

Marital status

Married

138

43.8

Single

177

56.2

Educational level

Grade 8 and lower

201

63.8

Grade 9–12

75

23.8

College and above

39

12.4

Residence

Urban

222

70.5

Rural

93

29.5

Episodes of hypoglycemia

Yes

63

20.0

No

252

80.0

Treatment option for DM

Insulin only

30

9.5

OHA

210

66.7

Both insulin and OHA

75

23.8

Lifetime khat use

Yes

165

52.4

No

150

47.6

Lifetime alcohol drink

Yes

99

31.4

No

216

68.6

Lifetime cigarette smoking

Yes

30

9.5

No

285

90.5

BMI

Underweight

15

4.8

Normoweight

183

58.1

Overweight

117

37.1

Duration of DM (years)

≤ 7

207

65.7

> 7

108

34.3

FBS (mg/dl)

≤ 125

99

31.4

≥ 126

216

68.6

Monthly income (in ETB)

Below 501

98

31.1

501–800

66

21.0

801–1500

78

24.8

> 1500

73

23.2

Occupation

Employed

114

36.2

Unemployed

201

63.8

OHA oral hypoglycemic agent, BMI body mass index, FBS fasting blood sugar, ETB Ethiopian Birr, DM diabetes mellitus

Prevalence of isolated systolic hypertension and vascular parameters

The prevalence of ISH was 27.6% [95% CI (22.7, 32.5%)] with a mean of 124.4 ± 18.95 mmHg. The overall comorbid hypertension was 41% with mean systolic to a diastolic blood pressure ratio of 1.62 ± (1.56) (Table 2).
Table 2

Blood pressure profiles of study participants (n = 315), Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016

BP profile

Category

Frequency

Percent

Mean ± SD

Isolated systolic HTN

Yes

87

27.6

 

No

228

72.4

 

Overall hypertension

Yes

129

41

 

No

186

59

 

Isolated diastolic HTN

Yes

42

13.3

 

No

273

86.7

 

SBP to DBP ratio

Minimum 1.11

Maximum 2.5

1.62 ± 1.56

Mean arterial pressure

Minimum 63.3

Maximum 120

93.2 ± 11.9

Pulse pressure

Minimum 10

Maximum 100

46.9 ± 40

SD standard deviation, HTN hypertension, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure

Sex, BMI, employment status, marital status, FPG, patients’ age, monthly income, lifetime alcohol drink, and educational level were candidates for final model. Male sex, older age, employment, educational level, income, and marital status were significantly associated with ISH. The odds of ISH among T2DM patients was 2.4 times higher [AOR = 2.4, 95% CI 1.21–4.72] in males than females. Patients aged 47–55 years had odds of 2.6 [AOR = 2.63, 95% CI 1.03–6.70] as compared to those aged 22–46 years. The odds of having ISH was 3.2 times among employed patients [AOR = 3.22, 95% CI 1.48–7.03] relative to unemployed T2DM patients. Patients who attained education level of ≤ grade 8 had odds of 2.9 [AOR = 2.94, 95% CI 1.10–7.85] as compared to those attaining college and above. Regarding marital status, single T2DM patients were 2.26 times more likely to get ISH than [AOR = 2.26, 95% CI 1.13–4.51] married individuals (Table 3).
Table 3

Predictors of isolated systolic hypertension among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients in bivariable and logistic regression analysis (n = 315), Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia, 2016

Variables

Isolated systolic hypertension

OR with 95% CI

Yes (%)

No (%)

COR

AOR

Sex

 Male

33 (20.4)

129 (79.6)

2.1 (1.29–3.54)

2.4 (1.21–4.72)*

 Female

54 (35.3)

99 (64.7)

1

1

BMI

 Normoweight

63 (31.8)

135 (68.2)

1

1

 Overweight

24 (20.5)

93 (79.5)

1.81 (1.06–3.10)

1.97 (0.97–4.00)

Occupation

 Employed

24 (21.1)

90 (78.9)

1.71 (0.99–2.94)

3.22 (1.48–7.03)**

 Unemployed

63 (31.3)

138 (68.7)

1

1

Marital status

 Married

51 (37)

87 (63)

1

1

 Single

36 (20.3)

141 (79.7)

2.29 (1.39–3.79)

2.26 (1.13–4.51)*

FPG (mg/dl)

 ≤ 125

36 (36.4)

63 (63.6)

1

 

 ≥ 126

51 (23.6)

165 (76.4)

1.85 (1.10–3.09)

Age in years

 22–46

21 (25.9)

60 (74.1)

1

1

 47–55

13 (15.5)

71 (84.5)

1.91 (0.88–4.14)

2.63 (1.03–6.70)*

 56–62

19 (23.5)

62 (76.5)

1.14 (0.56–2.33)

0.94 (0.39–2.25)

 ≥ 63

34 (49.3)

35 (50.7)

0.36 (0.18–0.72)

0.32 (0.13–0.78)*

Monthly income in ETB

 < 501

52 (53.1)

46 (46.9)

1

1

 501–800

6 (9.1)

60 (90.9)

11.3 (4.47–28.6)

21.9 (7.62–63.1)***

 801–1500

18 (23.1)

60 (76.9)

3.77 (1.95–7.29)

5.78 (2.55–13.1)***

 > 1500

11 (15.1)

62 (84.9)

6.37 (2.99–13.54)

4.23 (1.74–10.30)***

Educational status

 ≤ Grade 8

48 (23.9)

153 (76.1)

1.99 (0.97–4.10)

2.94 (1.10–7.85)*

 Grade 9–12

24 (32)

51 (68)

1.33 (0.59–2.98)

0.79 (0.27–2.28)

 ≥ College

15 (38.5)

24 (61.5)

1

1

* Significant (p < 0.05)

** Significant (p < 0.01)

*** Significant (p < 0.001)

Discussion

The current study, the first in Ethiopia in its kind, revealed 27.6% with 95% CI (22.7, 32.5%) prevalence of ISH. The high prevalence of ISH in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients might be related with increased vascular resistance via remodeling of blood vessels following hyperglycemia [7]. This finding is higher than a finding from Hosanna (8.6%) [36], though this study was not purposely done to determine ISH rather it was to determine overall hypertension. This is also lower than a study in Sweden with 6% systolic hypertension in diabetes patients [37]. This difference might be due to differences in sample size, adherence to pharmacologic treatment and self-care behavior and duration of disease across different areas. Nonetheless, the prevalence of ISH in the current study is lower than previous study conducted in Ghana, western Africa (37.4%) [22]. The possible difference might be linked with variations in the management of DM and socioeconomic factors of study participants.

In the final model significantly associated factors of ISH among T2DM patients were male sex, older age, employment status, lower educational level, monthly income, and marital status.

The odds of ISH among T2DM male patients was 2.4 times higher than females. This is similar to a study in South Africa [38] and Benghazi [17, 38]. However, there are reports against our study finding [39]. The possible reason for males to get ISH could be due to males have higher cardiac output than females. Another possible physiological reason might be because females have more estrogen and progesterone which decreases plasma cholesterol and vascular resistance respectively.

Participants with age of 47–55 years were 2.6 times more likely to get ISH than aged 22–46 years. It is in line with previous study [12, 40]. The possible reason for this might be atherosclerosis is common in older age due to vascular deposition of calcium and fat [41]. Employed patients were 3.2 times more likely to develop ISH than unemployed patients which is in line with other study [42]. Association of employment with ISH might be because employed individuals have sedentary lifestyle and unemployed individuals may be engaged in physical activities for searching out daily work but aforementioned associations are discouraged by other studies [17, 38]. Educational status of ≤ grade 8 were 2.9 times more likely to develop ISH than those in College and above level. This finding is similar with a study in Australia which reported that, decreased education level was associated with increased hypertension [34], Boston [33] and Saudi [19]. The probable reason for higher ISH in lower education level might be lack of awareness about lifestyle modification among patients who attained lower educational level. The odds of ISH in patients with monthly income of 501–800ETB, 801–1500ETB, and > 1500 ETB was 21.9 times, 5.78 times, and 4.23 times than those with monthly income of ≤ 500ETB respectively. This is consistence with previous studies [43, 44, 45]. This might be due to individuals with higher income are more likely to be obese and have sedentary lifestyle. Single T2DM patients were 2.26 times more likely to acquire ISH than married patients. This might be due to possible stress which lead to increase stress hormones in single than married patients. However, this finding is against previous study [36]. Body mass index and duration of DM were associated with hypertension in some studies [46] but it was not significant in our study.

Conclusion

In this study ISH was major public health problem. Being male, single, older age, lower education level and income were significant predictors. The findings of this study indicated health sector stakeholders to establish preventive strategies for ISH among T2DM patients by giving more attention to above mentioned predictor factors.

Limitations of the study

The study cannot show cause-effect relationship. Social desirability and recall bias were also possible limitations.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors’ would like to gratitude Jimma University, Specialized Hospital staff study participants, data collectors, and supervisors.

Authors’ contributions

BD and YY involved in proposal development, participated in data collection, statistical analysis, and manuscript write-up. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

No funding was obtained for this research work.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was given by the Institutional Review Board of Jimma University, College of Health Sciences and communicated with JUSH. Written consent was obtained from each study participants. Any distinguishable issues were eliminated to ascertain confidentiality.

Consent to publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

13104_2019_4550_MOESM1_ESM.docx (20 kb)
Additional file 1. English version questionnaire to assess predictors of isolated systolic hypertension among type 2 DM patients.

References

  1. 1.
    Colosia AD, Palencia R, Khan S. Prevalence of hypertension and obesity in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in observational studies: a systematic literature review. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2013;6:327–38.  https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S51325 (PMID:24082791).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    World health statistics. WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012. p. 43.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hernandez Vila E. A review of the JNC 8 blood pressure guideline. Tex Heart Inst J. 2015;42(3):226–8.  https://doi.org/10.14503/THIJ-15-5067 (PMID:26175633).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bavishi C, Goel S, Messerli FH. Isolated systolic hypertension: an update after SPRINT. Am J Med. 2016;129(12):1251–8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2016.08.032 (PMID:27639873).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, Redon J, Zanchetti A, Böhm M, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34(28):2159–219.  https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheart/eht151 (PMID:23771844).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Janka HU, Dirschedl P. Systolic blood pressure as a predictor for cardiovascular disease in diabetes. A 5-year longitudinal study. Hypertension. 2012;7(6_pt_2):90–4.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ohishi M. Hypertension with diabetes mellitus: physiology and pathology. Hypertens Res. 2018;41(6):389–93.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41440-018-0034-4 (PMID:29556093).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Alqudah BM, Mahmoud H, Alhusamia S, Sh A, Al L, Alawneh ZE. Prevalence of hypertension among diabetic type 2 patients attending medical clinic at prince Hashem Bin. Indian J Med Res Pharm Sci. 2017;4(6):47–54.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Adler AI, Stratton IM, Neil HA, Yudkin JS, Matthews DR, Cull CA, et al. Association of systolic blood pressure with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 36): prospective observational study. BMJ. 2000;321(7258):412–9.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.321.7258.412 (PMID:10938049).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Aronow WS, Shamliyan TA. Blood pressure targets for hypertension in patients with type 2 diabetes. Ann Transl Med. 2018;6(11):199.  https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2018.04.36 (PMID:30023362).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Park JB, Kario K, Wang JG. Systolic hypertension: an increasing clinical challenge in Asia. Hypertens Res. 2015;38(4):227–36.  https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2014.169 (PMID:25503845).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pinto E. Blood pressure and ageing. Postgrad Med J. 2007;83(976):109–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park S, Lakatta EG. Role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of arterial stiffness. Yonsei Med J. 2012;53(2):258–61.  https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2012.53.2.258 (PMID:22318811).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weisbrod RM, Shiang T, Al Sayah L, Fry JL, Bajpai S, Reinhart-King CA, et al. Arterial stiffening precedes systolic hypertension in diet-induced obesity. Hypertension. 2013;62(6):1105–10.  https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01744 (PMID:24060894).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cefalu WT. Inflammation, insulin resistance, and type 2 diabetes: back to the future? Diabetes. 2009;58(2):307–8.  https://doi.org/10.2337/db08-1656 (PMID:19171748).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Badawi A, Klip A, Haddad P, Cole DE, Bailo BG, El-Sohemy A, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and inflammation: prospects for biomarkers of risk and nutritional intervention. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2010;3:173–86.  https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S9089 (PMID:21437087).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Nouh F, Omar M, Younis M. Prevalence of hypertension among diabetic patients in benghazi: a study of prevalence of hypertension among diabetic patients in benghazi: a study of associated factors. Asian J Med Health. 2017;6(4):2456–8414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clara JG, De Macedo ME, Pego M. Prevalence of isolated systolic hypertension in the population over 55 years old Results from a national study. Rev Port Cardiol. 2007;26(1):11–8 (PMID:17427833).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saeed AA, Al-Hamdan NA. Isolated diastolic hypertension among adults in Saudi Arabia: prevalence, risk factors, predictors and treatment. Results of a national survey. Balkan Med J. 2016;33(1):52–7.  https://doi.org/10.5152/balkanmedj.2015.153022 (PMID:26966618).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Erhun W, Olayiwola G, Agbani E, Omotoso N. Prevalence of hypertension in a University Community in South West Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res. 2011;8(1):15–9.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ajbr.v8i1.35753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Grebla RC, Rodriguez CJ, Borrell LN, Pickering TG. Prevalence and determinants of isolated systolic hypertension among young adults: the 1999–2004 US National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey. J Hypertens. 2010;28(1):15–23.  https://doi.org/10.1097/HJH.0b013e328331b7ff (PMID:19730124).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ephraim RK, Saasi AR, Anto EO, Adoba P, Ephraim RK. Determinants of isolated systolic hypertension among diabetic patients visiting the diabetic clinic at the Tamale Teaching Hospital, Northern Ghana. Afr Health Sci. 2016;16(4):1151–6.  https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v16i4.33 (PMID:28479908).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Duprez DA. Systolic hypertension in the elderly: addressing an unmet need. Am J Med. 2008;121(3):179–184.e3.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2007.10.027 (PMID:18328297).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Revanna R, Davalgi S, Swamy N. Prevalence and risk factors of isolated systolic hypertension among the elderly population in Davangere, Karnataka. Int J Med Sci Public Health. 2018;7(3):1.  https://doi.org/10.5455/ijmsph.2018.1233512012018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Javascript R. Sample size calculator. Seattle: Raosoft, Inc.; 2004.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Farsang C, Medicine I, Hospital SE, Sleight P. Isolated systolic hypertension : cardiovascular risk and treatment benefits. European Society of Hypertension Sci Newsletter; 2001. pp. 6–7.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Williams B, et al. 2018 ESC/ESH Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension The Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Society of. Eur Heart J. 2018;39:3021–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dorosh P, Schmidt E. The rural–urban transformation in Ethiopia. Washington: International Food Policy Research Institute; 2015.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gelaw Y, Haile-Amlak A. Khat chewing and its socio-demographic correlates among the staff of Jimma University. Ethiop J Health Dev. 2011;18(3):179–84.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kebede Y. Cigarette smoking and khat chewing among university instructors in Ethiopia. East Afr Med J. 2002;79(5):274–8.  https://doi.org/10.4314/eamj.v79i5.8869 (PMID:12638815).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ferrari P, Licaj I, Muller DC, Kragh Andersen P, Johansson M, Boeing H, et al. Lifetime alcohol use and overall and cause-specific mortality in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and nutrition (EPIC) study. BMJ Open. 2014;4(7):e005245.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005245 (PMID:24993766).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Seaquist ER, Anderson J, Childs B, Cryer P, Dagogo-Jack S, Fish L, American Diabetes Association, Endocrine Society, et al. Hypoglycemia and diabetes: a report of a workgroup of the American Diabetes Association and the Endocrine Society. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(5):1845–59.  https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-4127 (PMID:23589524).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kiely DK, Grossa AL, Kima DH, Lipsitz LA. The association of educational attainment and SBP among older community-living adults: the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect and Zest in the Elderly (MOBILIZE) Boston Study. J Hypertens. 2012;30(8):1518–25 (PMID:22688267).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kautzky-Willer A, Dorner T, Jensby A, Rieder A. Women show a closer association between educational level and hypertension or diabetes mellitus than males: a secondary analysis from the Austrian HIS. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(392):392.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-12-392 (PMID:22646095).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Cioffi G, Faganello G, De Feo S, Berlinghieri N, Tarantini L, Di Lenarda A, et al. Combined circumferential and longitudinal left ventricular systolic dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without myocardial ischemia. Exp Clin Cardiol. 2013;18(1):e26–31 (PMID:24294044).PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Tadesse K, Amare H, Hailemariam T, Gebremariam T. Prevalence of hypertension among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its socio demographic factors in Nigist Ellen Mohamed Memorial. J Diabetes Metab. 2018;9(4):4–10.  https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6156.1000792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wijkman M, Länne T, Östgren CJ, Nystrom FH. Diastolic orthostatic hypertension and cardiovascular prognosis in type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2016;15(83):83.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-016-0399-0 (PMID:27255168).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Adeniyi OV, Yogeswaran P, Longo-Mbenza B, Ter Goon D. Uncontrolled hypertension and its determinants in patients with concomitant type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in rural South Africa. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(3):e0150033.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150033 (PMID:26930050).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Apidechkul T. Prevalence and factors associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension among the hill tribe elderly populations in northern Thailand. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):694.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-018-5607-2 (PMID:29871598).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Pandey AR, Karki KB, Mehata S, Aryal KK, Thapa P, Pandit A, et al. Prevalence and determinants of comorbid diabetes and hypertension in Nepal: evidence from non communicable disease risk factors STEPS Survey Nepal 2013. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2015;13(29):20–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Head T, Daunert S, Goldschmidt-Clermont PJ. The aging risk and atherosclerosis: a fresh look at arterial homeostasis. Front Genet. 2017;8(216):216.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00216 (PMID:29312440).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Muddu M, Mutebi E, Ssinabulya I, Kizito S, Mondo CK. Hypertension among newly diagnosed diabetic patients at Mulago National Referral Hospital in Uganda: a cross sectional study. Cardiovasc J Afr. 2018;29(4):218–24.  https://doi.org/10.5830/CVJA-2018-015 (PMID:29750228).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Singsalasang A, Laohasiriwong W, Puttanapong N, Phajan T, Boonyaleephan S. Socioeconomic disparities in income, education and geographic location for hypertension among Thai adults: results from the National Socioeconomic Survey [version 1; peer review: 2 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. F1000Research. 2017;6:1836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Ángela DL, Reinel ML. Prevalence and variables associated with pediculosis capitis in kindergarten children from Popayán, Colombia. Rev Fac Med. 2017;65(3):425–8.  https://doi.org/10.15446/revfacmed.v65n3.58812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Baek TH, Lee HY, Lim NK, Park HY. Gender differences in the association between socioeconomic status and hypertension incidence: the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES). BMC Public Health. 2015;15(1):852.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-015-2175-6 (PMID:26336067).CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Berraho M, El Achhab Y, Benslimane A, Rhazi KEL, Mohamed Chikri CN. Hypertension and type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Morocco (EPIDIAM Study). Pan Afr Med J. 2012;11(52):1–9.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Human PhysiologyUniversity of GondarGondarEthiopia

Personalised recommendations