Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 12:192 | Cite as

Intestinal parasitic infections among public and private schoolchildren of Kathmandu, Nepal: prevalence and associated risk factors

  • Jitendra ShresthaEmail author
  • Balkrishna Bhattachan
  • Ganesh Rai
  • Eun Young Park
  • Shiba Kumar Rai
Open Access
Research note

Abstract

Objective

Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are a major cause of morbidity among children in developing countries. Investigation about the etiological agents and socio-ecological pattern of the infection would help to design better preventive strategy. The previous studies reported high prevalence of IPIs among schoolchildren of Nepal. Though these data may be essential for the policymakers and researchers, in Kathmandu, the capital of Nepal it remains unexplored whether the types of school and socioeconomic status affect the IPIs or not. The present study is an extension of previous works to investigate causative agents and associated risk factors. We examined 508 stool samples of schoolchildren from two schools by formal-ether concentration technique and analyzed the data based on school types.

Results

The overall IPIs rate was 19.9% (n = 101) with the dominance of protozoans (78.4%) over helminths (21.6%). Giardia duodenalis (32.7%) and Ascaris lumbricoides (21.8%) were the most commonly detected protozoan and helminth species respectively. Prevalence of IPIs was higher among children from public school (26.1%) than private school (12.1%). Higher infection rates were found among farmer’s children (29.0%) and Dalit children (36.2%). These findings reveal the different prevalence of IPIs among public and private schoolchildren and suggest the need of effective preventive measures.

Keywords

Intestinal parasites Giardia duodenalis Schoolchildren Kathmandu Nepal 

Abbreviations

SICOST

Shi-Gan International College of Science and Technology

WHO

World Health Organization

Introduction

Intestinal parasitic infections (IPIs) are one of the common cause of diarrhea in developing countries. Globally 1.5 billion people are infected with soil-transmitted helminths, above 267 million preschool children and over 568 million school-age children live in intestinal helminths prevalent area [1]. IPIs gradually exacerbate the nutritional status with an adverse effect on childhood development and increase morbidity among children [1]. In adults, IPIs it reduces work productivity and impairs the economic growth of developing nations [2]. In children, Insufficiency of safe drinking water, overcrowded population and poor personal hygiene with weak nutritional status have been identified as the risk factors for IPIs [3, 4].

Globally IPIs related morbidity has been considered as a major threat for public health. A prevalence of 85.7% has been reported in Ecuador for IPIs, with a majority of Entamoeba histolytica/dispar (57.1%) and Ascaris lumbricoides (35.5%) infections [5]. Similarly, a prevalence rate higher than 50.0% has been reported for soil-transmitted helminths in the northern part of India with a dominance of A. lumbricoides [6]. Moreover, IPIs were found prevalent and a cause of diarrhea among kindergarten and/or schoolchildren in Ghana [7] and China [8], respectively. In Nepal, a recent study [9] showed that the prevalence of IPIs decreased among schoolchildren from 61.0% in 1990 to approximately 20.0% in 2015, indicating a declining pattern in the last two decades. In Kathmandu, a study [10] reported that the prevalence of IPIs is higher among public schoolchildren than private schoolchildren. In this study, we aimed to assess the recent prevalence pattern of IPIs among public and private schoolchildren of Kathmandu as the extension of previous research.

The objectives of this study are to compare the prevalence rate of IPIs among private and public schoolchildren of Kathmandu and to evaluate possible associations of IPIs patterns with demographic, socio-economic and behavioral factors. Our findings would be beneficial to implement possible preventive measures to control and cure the parasite associated infections among the dwellers.

Main text

Methods

Study design and site

This cross-sectional type of study was carried out from March to September 2014. This study was done among public and private schoolchildren of Kathmandu, Nepal. Kathmandu Valley is situated at an average elevation of 1400 m (4600 ft) above the sea level and has an approximate population density of 4416 per km2 within a total area of 50.7 km2 [11].

Study population

Among many public and private schools in Kathmandu, a public and a private school were randomly selected with a similar location. The total student population was 1027 and 673 in public and the private school, respectively. The sample size (508) was calculated using Cochran’s sample size formula for categorical data [12] and a total of 508 stool samples (284 from schoolchildren of the public school and 224 from schoolchildren of the private school) were collected and examined. The students from nursery to grade 10 were included in this study. Children who could not obtain their stool themselves and samples contaminated by water, urine otherwise materials were excluded from the study. A short questionnaire was designed which included: (a) demographic data, as age, gender, ethnicity, parent’s occupation (daily basis labor, road cleaners, foreign employers and employees of private firms) and family size; (b) behavioral data, as types of drinking water (government supplied tap water, filtrated tap water in commercial ceramic water filter, commercial mineral water sold in a jar); (c) public or private school. Data were collected by well-trained volunteers.

Sample collection

For specimen collection, well labeled, clean, dry, disinfectant free, wide-mouthed plastic containers were distributed to the study population with instruction requesting them to bring about 10-g stool sample the next morning. The containers were labeled with children’s name, code number and date of collection. Stool samples were collected from each student along with demographic and behavioral data using a questionnaire.

Macroscopic examination and sample transportation

Collected stool samples were macroscopically examined for color, consistency, and presence of blood, mucus and fragmented or entire helminths, and were immediately fixed with the same volume of 10% formal saline. The fixed stool samples were transported to the Laboratory of (Shi-Gan International College of Science and Technology) SICOST, Kathmandu, Nepal.

Microscopic examination

Formal-ether sedimentation technique

About 3–4 mL of each formalin-fixed fecal sample were filtered using a cotton gauze in the test tube, mixed (3–4 mL) diethyl ether and vigorously shaken for 5 min, then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min. The sediment was collected, mounted with iodine solution and microscopically examined for fecal parasites (eggs, oocysts and trophozoites) by using 10× and 40× objectives [13].

Data analysis

Pearson’s Chi-Square test value was applied for statistical analysis of results using SPSS 16.0 data analysis software. The odds ratio for risk the factor was calculated using Microsoft Excel. p-values < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant.

Results

An overall IPIs prevalence of 19.9% (101/508) was found. Multi-parasite infections were detected in 25.7% (26/101) of the stool samples, 22.8% (23/101) was from public school and 2.9% (3/101) from private school (OR: 3.6).

IPIs prevalence was 26.1% (74/284) in public schoolchildren and 12.1% (27/224) in private schoolchildren (p < 0.05) (OR = 2.6) (Fig. 1). According to the gender, a prevalence of 20.0% (50/251) and of 19.8% (51/257) was found among female and male, respectively (p = 0.842) (OR: 1.0) (Table 1). In public school, a prevalence of 26.7% (39/146) and 25.7% (35/138) were found among female and male respectively (OR: 1.1), while in private school female to male prevalence rate were 10.5% (11/105) and 13.4% (16/119) respectively (OR: 0.7). According to the different children age groups, IPIs prevalence rates of 18.5% (43/232) and 21.0% (58/276) were found in 4–10 years old and 11–19 years old group (p = 0.671) (OR: 0.89), respectively. More specifically, in public school, a prevalence of 31.6% (18/57) was found among 4–10 years age group, and 24.7% (56/227) among 11–19 years age group (OR: 1.4), whereas in private school, IPIs prevalence was 14.3% (25/175) in 4–10 years old children and 4.1% (2/49) in 11–19 years old children (OR: 3.91). Intestinal parasites were detected in 22.6% (40/177) population drinking mineral water, followed by 20.0% (14/70) among those drinking filtrated water and by 18.0% (47/261) among those drinking tap water (p > 0.05). Moreover, IPIs prevalence was 19.5% (45/231) in children having a family size less than 5 members, whereas 20.2% (56/277) of children having a family size more than 5 members were positive (OR: 0.95). However, no significant difference was found according to the size of the family (p > 0.05). Based on parent occupation, the prevalence of IPIs in farming family was 29.0% (40/138), followed by 18.8% (22/117) and 14.3% (18/126) among businessman and government job holder (p > 0.05), respectively. Parents of the 16.5% (21/127) positive children were employed in other jobs. According to ethnicity, the prevalence of IPIs among children from the Dalit community 36.2% (17/47) followed by Tibeto-Burman 20.6% (45/218) and Indo-Aryan 16.0% (39/243), (p < 0.05). The prevalence of protozoan infections (78.4%) was approximately thrice the prevalence of helminth infections (21.6%) (Fig. 2a). Giardia duodenalis 32.7% (33) was the most prevalent protozoan followed by Endolimax nana 31.7% (32), Entamoeba coli 22.8% (23), Entamoeba histolytica/dispar 20.8% (21) and Blastocystis hominis 2.0% (2). Among helminths, A. lumbricoides 21.8% (22) was the most prevalent species followed by Trichuris trichiura 4.0% (4) and Hymenolepis nana 2.0% (2) (Fig. 2b).
Fig. 1

Map of Kathmandu valley of Nepal, showing prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among schoolchildren. Stool samples were collected from children of public and private school of Kathmandu (capital city of Nepal), examined macroscopically and microscopically by formal ether sedimentation technique (n = 508, M/F; 257/251)

Table 1

Distribution of IPIs according to socio-demographic characteristics of the schoolchildren in public and private schools of Kathmandu, Nepal

Characteristics

Public school

N = 284

Private school

N = 224

Total positive (%) N = 101

Total N = 508

p-value

Odds ratio

Positive (%)

Total

Positive (%)

Total

Gender

 Male

35 (25.4)

138

16 (13.4)

119

51 (19.8)

257

0.842

1.0

 Female

39 (26.7)

146

11 (10.5)

105

50 (20.0)

251

Age (years)

 4–10

18 (31.6)

57

25 (14.3)

175

43 (18.5)

232

0.671

0.89

 11–19

56 (24.7)

227

2 (4.1)

49

58 (21.0)

276

Source of drinking water

 Mineral water

31 (28.2)

110

9 (13.4)

67

40 (22.6)

177

0.629

 

 Filtrate water

9 (23.1)

39

5 (16.1)

31

14 (20.0)

70

 Tap water

34 (25.2)

135

13 (10.3)

126

47 (18.0)

261

Size of family

 ≤ 5 member

29 (26.4)

110

16 (13.2)

121

45 (19.5)

231

0.866

0.95

 > 5 member

45 (25.1)

174

11 (10.7)

103

56 (20.2)

277

Occupation of parent’s

 Farming

38 (31.1)

122

2 (12.5)

16

40 (29.0)

138

0.076

 

 Business

17 (29.3)

58

5 (8.5)

59

22 (18.8)

117

 Others

13 (17.1)

76

8 (15.7)

51

21 (16.5)

127

 Government job

6 (21.4)

28

12 (12.2)

98

18 (14.3)

126

Ethnicity

 Dalit

11 (44.0)

25

6 (27.3)

22

17 (36.2)

47

0.045

 

 Tibeto-Burman

35 (27.8)

126

10 (10.9)

92

45 (20.6)

218

 Indo-Aryan

28 (21.1)

133

11 (10.0)

110

39 (16.0)

243

Fig. 2

Prevalence of a protozoan and helminths intestinal parasites and b individual intestinal parasites detected in stool samples of public and private schoolchildren from Kathmandu, Nepal. Stool samples were collected from children of public and private schools of Kathmandu (capital city of Nepal) and examined macroscopically and microscopically by formal ether sedimentation technique (Black: private school; Blue: public school; Red: total) (n = 508, Public/Private; 284/224)

Discussion

Nepal is a landlocked developing country, located in South Asia where diseases such as diarrhea, gastrointestinal disorders, and intestinal parasites are prevalent [10]. IPIs are considered as the major public health concern worldwide and a significant health concern among schoolchildren of Nepal [14, 15]. Although the prevalence of IPIs in schoolchildren of Nepal is declining [9, 16], in our study 19.9% schoolchildren were found to be affected with IPIs. This prevalence is in agreement with previous reports in Kathmandu 22.0% [11] and Kaski 21.3% [17], which is lower than the reports from other areas of Nepal (31.5–51.9%) [18, 19, 20, 21]. This reduced prevalence of IPIs among schoolchildren is due to the periodic deworming and awareness campaigns conducted by the government [22, 23]. Our finding is in agreement with other reports from Nigeria and Nepal showing a higher prevalence of IPIs in public schools (36.7%) and (20.0%) than in private schools (14.1%) and (9.8%), respectively [10, 24]. The instituting of public and private school system in Nepal is based on an unequal socio-economic status of the people [25]. Most of the public schoolchildren belong to the family having a relatively low economic status [19], where they could not offer quality care and good personal hygiene to their children compared to a well-off family. During the study, we found that most of the parents in private school send drinking water in a bottle along with tiffin-box, while public school children drink tap water supplied in the school. Besides that, poor sanitation facility available in the toilet, high exposure to contaminated soil in the playground and low awareness among parents may represent further important reasons for the higher prevalence of IPIs found among public school children in this study.

Similar to previous reports [10, 17], protozoan parasites were found to be prevalent in this study. The higher prevalence of protozoan infections may be owing to higher contamination of drinking water with protozoa compared to helminths. Eight species of parasites were detected in the stool samples. G. duodenalis (32.7%) was the most prevalent species, followed by E. nana (31.7%) and E. coli (22.8%). Various reports from Nepal showed that G. duodenalis is a common intestinal parasite with prevalence rates ranging from 13.2 to 73.4% [17, 26, 27, 28]. The dominance of protozoa over helminths and the higher prevalence of G. duodenalis may depend on its capacity to resist normal level of chlorine treatment in drinking water [29]. A study from Kathmandu reported poor drinking water quality exceeding World Health Organization guideline of coliform count (0 cfu/100 mL) [30].

Alike previous reports [15, 31, 32, 33] a high IPIs prevalence among Dalit children (36.2%) was detected in this study, followed by Tibeto-Burman (20.6%) and Indo-Aryan (16.0%). The IPIs prevalence pattern according to ethnicity was similar in both schools. In contrast to our finding, some studies conducted in Kathmandu reported dominant IPIs rate among Tibeto-Burman [32, 33]. The higher prevalence among Dalit and Tibeto-Burman children may be linked with the relatively lower socio-economic status of these ethnic groups [34, 35].

In addition, the prevalence of parasitic infections was statistically independent of gender, source of drinking water and family size. In the public school, most of the children drink water from common water sources whereas in private school, children only share their water bottle. Furthermore, the high susceptibility of parasitic infection among small aged (4–10 years) children reported in this study is in agreement with previous reports from Nigeria [24] and Nepal [36]. This might be attributed to the strengthening of immune status as well as increasing awareness toward hygienic behaviors with age of children. The higher age-wise variance in the prevalence of IPIs in the private school (OR: 3.91) respect to the public school (OR: 1.4), might be due to the early enrollment of children in private schools. Our study has evidenced the relationship between child health status and their parent’s occupation. A high prevalence rate (29%) of IPIs was found in children from farming family, which is concurrent with findings of previous reports [10, 36] from Nepal. This higher prevalence of IPIs in children whose parents adopt farming as the main occupation might be due to their exposure to contaminated soil in farming field, since children help their parents in farming during leisure time. In developing countries like Nepal, the children still get malnourished due to low income, improper nutritional education, inadequate access to health service and lack of safe drinking water and sanitation facilities, and all these factors contribute to the child mortality rate [10]. The higher prevalence rate of IPIs among public schoolchildren can be attributed to their unapproachability to safe drinking water, unhygienic personal habits due to lack of health awareness as most of the children in public school belong to the lower and lower-middle class family. Moreover, the quantity of water supplied in the Kathmandu valley is insufficient relative to its demand. This is also an issue for the sufficiency of sanitation facility in household and schools as well.

Conclusions

In conclusion, IPIs is an important public health problem among schoolchildren in Kathmandu, Nepal. Our study revealed that the prevalence of IPIs in schoolchildren is significantly associated with types of school. Furthermore, protozoa were found more prevalent than helminths, which might be linked with drinking water. The socioeconomic status and occupation of parents, the age of children and ethnicity are significantly associated with parasitic infections. Health awareness program should provide especially to the parents from the Dalit ethnic group and farmers. Installation of mass water filter and chlorination of drinking water should be applied in both schools. Further studies equipped with advanced microscopic and molecular techniques would be helpful for a proper diagnosis to implement effective prophylaxis.

Limitations

Due to the limitation of time and resources this study was subjected to incorporate barely only one public and one private school for the comparative study.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

JS, SKR, GR design the study in SICOST. SKR and GR supervised the study. JS collected the stool samples from schoolchildren of Kathmandu valley, transported and processed in research laboratory. JS, BB and EYP analyzed the data and prepared initial draft of the manuscript. EYP and SKR revised the writing article. All authors provided feedback and insights into manuscript. Finally, JS, EYP and BB finalized the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to show gratitude to teachers, staffs, and participants of both Schools for cooperation during sample collection. We would also like to thank all the staffs of SICOST, Dr. Megh Raj Banjara (Head of the department; Central Department of Microbiology, Tribhuvan University) for their technical support and help during the laboratory work and data analysis. Furthermore, we would like to thank Mr. Suman Rimal, Mr. Subash Dhakal, Mr. Binod Aryal and Mr. Tankeswor Acharya for their assistance in English language editing in the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All supplementary files, data generated and analyzed during this study will be made available as per request to the corresponding author.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The ethical approval of this study was obtained from the Shi-Gan Institutional Review Committee (IRC), an ethical review committee of (SICOST) Kathmandu, Nepal (IRC Reference No: 04/2071/08/26) a networking member of Nepal Health Research Council. Before sample collection, written informed consent was obtained from their guardians on behalf of their children.

Funding

The researchers didn’t receive any kind of governmental and institutional funding.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO. Fact sheet, soil-transmitted helimnth infections. https://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections. Accessed 2 Feb 2019.
  2. 2.
    Bethony J, Brooker S, Albonico M, Geiger SM, Loukas A, Diemert D, et al. Soil-transmitted helminth infections: ascariasis, trichuriasis, and hookworm. Lancet. 2006;367(9521):1521–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alum A, Rubino JR, Ijaz MK. The global war against intestinal parasites—should we use a holistic approach? Int J Infect Dis. 2010;14(9):732–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tiwari BR, Chaudhary R, Adhikari N, Jayaswal S, Poudel T, Rijal K. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among school children of Dadeldhura District. Nepal JHAS. 2013;3(1):14–6.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jacobsen KH, Ribeiro PS, Quist BK, Rydbeck BV. Prevalence of intestinal parasites in young Quichua children in the highlands of rural Ecuador. J Health Popul Nutr. 2007;25(4):399–405.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salam N, Azam S. Prevalence and distribution of soil-transmitted helminth infections in India. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):201.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Walana W, Tay SCK, Tetteh P, Ziem JB. Prevalence of intestinal protozoan infestation among primary school children in urban and peri-urban communities in Kumasi, Ghana. SJPH. 2014;2(2):52–7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tian L-G, Steinmann P, Chen J-X, Chen S-H, Zhou X-N. HIV/AIDS, parasites and co-infections: publication patterns in China. Parasit Vectors. 2009;2(1):31.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kunwar R, Acharya L, Karki S. Decreasing prevalence of intestinal parasitic infections among school-aged children in Nepal: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2016;110(6):324–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tandukar S, Ansari S, Adhikari N, Shrestha A, Gautam J, Sharma B, et al. Intestinal parasitosis in school children of Lalitpur district of Nepal. BMC Res Notes. 2013;6(1):449.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhandari D, Tandukar S, Sherchand S, Thapa P, Shah P. Cryptosporidium infection among the school children of Kathmandu Valley. J Inst Med. 2015;37(1):82–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barlett JE, Kotrlik JW, Higgins CC. Organizational research: determining appropriate sample size in survey research. Inf Technol Learn Perform J. 2001;19(1):43.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bhattachan B, Panta Y, Tiwari S, Sherchand J, Rai S. Intestinal parasitic infection among school children in Chitwan District Of Nepal. J Inst Med. 2015;37(2):79–84.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Khanal L, Choudhury D, Rai S, Sapkota J, Barakoti A, Amatya R, et al. Prevalence of intestinal worm infestations among school children in Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(4):272–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mukhiya R, Rai S, Karki A, Prajapati A. Intestinal protozoan parasitic infection among school children. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10(22):204–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kunwar R, Acharya L, Karki S. Trends in prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth and major intestinal protozoan infections among school-aged children in Nepal. Trop Med Int Health. 2016;21(6):703–19.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chandrashekhar T, Joshi H, Gurung M, Subba S, Rana M, Shivananda P. Prevalence and distribution of intestinal parasitic infestations among school children in Kaski District, Western Nepal. JMBR. 2005;4(1):78–82.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sah RB, Bhattarai S, Yadav S, Baral R, Jha N, Pokharel PK. A study of prevalence of intestinal parasites and associated risk factors among the school children of Itahari, Eastern Region of Nepal. Trop Parasitol. 2013;3(2):140–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shrestha SK, Rai SK, Vitrakoti R, Pokharel P. Parasitic infection in school children in Thimi area, Kathmandu valley. J Nepal Assoc Med Lab Sci. 2009;10(1):31–3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sherchand P, Joshi DR, Adhikari N, Gurung K, Pant K, Pun R, et al. Intestinal parasitosis among school going children. JHAS. 2010;1(1):12–5.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bhandari N, Kausaph V, Neupane G. Intestinal parasitic infection among school age children. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2011;9(1):30–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Adhikari S, Shrestha NL. School led total sanitation: a successful model to promote school and community sanitation and hygiene in Nepal. In: James W, Joep V, Christine S, Carmen DS, Peter R, editors. Beyond construction use by all, A collection of case studies from sanitation and hygiene promotion practitioners in South Asia. London: WaterAid; 2008. p. 113–25.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dahal KR, Adhikari B, Tamang J. Sanitation coverage and impact of open defecation free (ODF) zone with special reference to Nepal: a review. Int J Eng Res Appl. 2014;4(8):1–11.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Esiet ULP, Edet I. Comparative prevalence of intestinal parasites among children in public and private schools in Calabar South, Calabar, Cross River State, Nigeria. Am J Res Commun. 2017;5(1):80–97.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    OECD. Public and private schools: how management and funding relate to their socio-economic profile. OECD Publishing; 2012.  https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264175006-en.
  26. 26.
    Easow JM, Mukhopadhyay C, Wilson G, Guha S, Jalan BY, Shivananda PG. Emerging opportunistic protozoa and intestinal pathogenic protozoal infestation profile in children of western Nepal. NMCJ. 2005;7(2):134–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dhital S, Pant ND, Neupane S, Khatiwada S, Gaire B, Sherchand JB, et al. Prevalence of enteropathogens in children under 15 years of age with special reference to parasites in Kathmandu, Nepal; a cross sectional study. SpringerPlus. 2016;5(1):1813.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Tandukar S, Sherchand JB, Xue J, Uprety S, Sherchan SP, Bhandari D, et al. Prevalence and associated risk factors of Giardia duodenalis infection among school-going children in Nepal. Parasitol Res. 2018;117(1):287–93.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Okhuysen PC, White AC Jr. Parasitic infections of the intestines. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 1999;12(5):467–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Prasai T, Lekhak B, Joshi DR, Baral MP. Microbiological analysis of drinking water of Kathmandu Valley. Sci World. 2007;5(5):112–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Adhikari N, Bomjan R, Khatri DB, Dhakal P, Lekhak B. Intestinal Helminthic infections among school children in Kathmandu valley. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2007;5:17–21.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sharma BK, Rai SK, Rai DR, Choudhury DR. Prevalence of intestinal parasitic infestation in schoolchildren in the northeastern part of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health. 2004;35(3):501–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Magar DT, Rai S, Lekhak B, Rai K. Study of parasitic infection among children of Sukumbasi Basti in Kathmandu valley. Nepal Med Coll J. 2011;13(1):7–10.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Bishwakarma G. The high school educational status of Dalit in Nepal: from exclusion to success story. Kuopio: ResearchGate: University of Joensuu; 2009.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rajeswari B, Sinniah B, Hussein H. Socio-economic factors associated with intestinal parasites among children living in Gombak, Malaysia. Asia Pac J Public Health. 1994;7(1):21–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shakya B, Shrestha S, Madhikarmi NL, Adhikari R. Intestinal parasitic infection among school children. J Nepal Health Res Counc. 2012;10(20):20–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Shi-Gan International College of Science and Technology, Affiliated to Tribhuvan UniversityKathmanduNepal
  2. 2.College of PharmacyMokpo National UniversityMokpoSouth Korea

Personalised recommendations