Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 12:177 | Cite as

Factors associated with knowledge on obstetric danger signs among women who gave birth within 1 year in Bahir Dar city administration, North West, Ethiopia

  • Azezu Asres NigussieEmail author
  • Amanu Aragaw Emiru
  • Yeshalem Mulugeta Demilew
  • Eleni Admassu Mersha
Open Access
Research note
  • 154 Downloads

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to assess factors associated with knowledge on obstetric danger signs among women who gave birth within 1 year in North West, Ethiopia.

Results

Overall, 37.9% of the respondents were knowledgeable. Women mention three and more key danger signs during pregnancy and after delivery were 15% and 18.5% respectively. Decision making power of women [AOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.10, 2.29], starting antenatal visit lately [AOR = 3.1, 95% CI 1.63, 6.33], housewife [AOR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.25, 3.68], merchant [AOR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.05, 3.88], and government employees [AOR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.38, 5.49] were among the predictors of knowledge on obstetric danger signs.

Keywords

Knowledge Women Obstetric danger signs 

Abbreviations

ANC

Antenatal Care

AOR

Adjusted Odds Ratio

COR

Crudes Odds Ratio

EDHS

Ethiopian Demographic Health Surveys

HSDP

Health Sector Development Program

MMR

Maternal Mortality Ratio

ODSs

Obstetrics Danger Signs

WHO

World Health Organization

Introduction

Obstetrics danger signs (ODSs) are unexpected symptoms that can lead to maternal health complications which occur during pregnancy, childbirth and after delivery [1]. Most could be prevented or managed if the woman had aware of it and seek medical care without delays [2, 3, 4, 5].

Thus, Safe Motherhood initiative advocates the provision of advice during antenatal care (ANC) about ODSs and how to seek medical care for pregnant women and their families when raising these sudden obstetrical complications. This is viewed as central strategy to reduce delays in seeking skilled care [6].

Evidence suggests that ensuring the accessibility and use of obstetric services, and raising the awareness of women about ODS could save 310,000 newborn lives a year, and also, improves early detection of problems and reduces the delay in decision to seek obstetric care. Improving knowledge of women on ODSs enhances utilization of skilled care and decreases pregnancy rates in low-income countries [7, 8].

While a number of countries have made substantial progress in reducing maternal and child mortality, the high rate of maternal and neonatal mortalities related to obstetric causes. However, are still of great concern for many sub-Saharan countries including Ethiopia where the Maternal Mortality Ratio (MMR) is declining steadily [9, 10].

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that, currently 287,000 women a year die of preventable complications related to pregnancy and childbirth; the majority of these (99%) occur in developing countries and, out of those, 51% occur in the Sub-Saharan region [11].

Though, the 2015 target of MMR for Ethiopia was 218/100,000 live births, the 2005 and 2011 Ethiopian Demographic Health Surveys (EDHS) reported MMR were still high 673 and 676 respectively [12, 13].

Also the report of mid-term review of the Health Sector Development Program (HSDP-III) in Ethiopia related to maternal and neonatal health, at the community level, indicated limited progress in educating communities regarding danger signs during pregnancy and child birth [14].

Low coverage of maternal health services and high rate of neonatal and maternal mortalities related to obstetric causes are still of great concern in Ethiopia [13]. Lack of awareness of on obstetric complications might be the reason for failure of women to attend health care facilities, which initiated us to study level of knowledge and associated factors on obstetric danger signs.

Main text

Methods

Study design and settings

Community-based cross-sectional study was conducted at Bahir Dar City Administration from March 1–30, 2013. The city is located approximately 565 km Northwest of Addis Ababa, capital city of Ethiopia. It has 12 rural and 9 urban kebeles. The projected total population of the city was 251,309. Of these, 30,877 were female in reproductive age. More than 47 health institutions were available in the city administration in different level [15].

Study participants

All mothers who gave birth prior to the study were the source population. This study included all women who gave birth within 1 year during the data collection period. Mothers who had severe health problems during data collection period were excluded.

Sample size determination

The sample size was determined using single population proportions, 95% confidence level, 4% marginal error, 30.4% of prevalence from previous study [16], design effect 2, and 10% non-response rate, the final sample size was 715.

Sampling and sampling procedure

Multi-stage sampling technique was applied to identify study participants. First, all the Kebeles (the smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia) were stratified into urban and rural. Two urban and three rural Kebeles were selected by simple random sampling. Then, total sample size was allocated proportionally on each kebele. Finally, systematic sampling technique was employed to select the study subjects.

Data collection tool and procedure

Structured interviewer-administered data collection formats were developed from different literatures. Ten diploma Midwife interviewers and four BSc nurse supervisors were recruited and trained for 2 days. Face to face interview was done at the participant’s house. The questionnaire was piloted on 5% and necessary adjustments were made.

The knowledge of ODSs was assessed by ten items questions such as: during pregnancy (severe vaginal bleeding, swollen hands/face, and blurred vision), delivery (severe vaginal bleeding, prolonged labor, convulsions, and retained placenta), and postpartum period (foul-smelling vaginal discharge, and high grade fever) which has yes no response. Score one was given if the response is correct and zero was given for wrong response. The sum of responses above mean was considered as knowledgeable [17]. The supervisors and investigators have checked the filled questionnaires on the spot and correction was made on a daily basis.

Operational definitions

Knowledgeable on pregnancy ODS—ability of women to mention at least two of the three key ODSs during pregnancy.

Knowledgeable on child birth ODS—ability of women to mention at least two of the four key ODSs during child birth.

Knowledgeable on ODS after delivery—ability of women to mention at least two of the three key ODSs after delivery.

Overall knowledgeable: the ability of participants to mention above the mean of the selected ten key commonest ODSs.

Data management and data analysis

The data entering and cleaning was done through Epi Info version 3.5.3 and transported to SPSS version 16 for analysis. Both bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were applied. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant at 95% confidence level. Backward stepwise logistic regression analysis was employed to determine the putative association of independent variables with the outcome variable.

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants

Out of a total of 715 women planned to be included in the study, 701 women were enrolled in this study, yielding a response rate of 98%. The mean age of the study participants was 28.6 years with SD of ± 6.6 years; three-fourth of them, 529 (75.5%) were in the age group of 20–34 years.

Regarding to residence, 555 (79.2%) the respondents were urban dwellers. Most of the women, 565 (80.6%) were Orthodox Christians. Majority, 687 (98%) of them belonged to Amhara ethnic group. Two hundred fourteen (30.5%) respondents didn’t attend formal education. Housewives were 430 (61.3%), and 351 (50.1%) study participants got < 881 Ethiopian birr monthly. More than six in ten, 437 (62.3%) women lived within family consisting up to four members (Table 1).
Table 1

Distribution of the study participants by socio demographic characteristics in in Bahir Dar city, North West, Ethiopia, March, 2013 (n = 701)

Characteristics

Number

 %

Age in years

 < 20 

27

3.8

 20–34 

529

75.5

 35+

145

20.7

Residence

 Urban

555

79.2

 Rural

146

20.8

Marital status

 Married/in union

603

86.0

 Single/separated

98

14.0

Religion

 Orthodox

565

80.6

 Muslim

121

17.3

 Protestant

12

1.7

 Catholic

3

0.4

Educational level of the mother

 No formal education

214

30.5

 Primary education

301

42.9

 Secondary education

108

15.5

 Higher education

78

11.1

Occupational status of the mother

 House wife

430

61.3

 Merchant

98

14.0

 G/employed

75

10.7

Othersa

98

14.0

Ethnicity

 Amhara

687

98.0

 Othersb

14

2.0

Monthly income in birr

 75–450 birr

195

27.8

 451–880 birr

156

22.3

 881–2580 birr

176

25.1

 2580–9950 birr

174

24.8

Family size

 1–4

437

62.3

 5–6

218

31.1

  ≥ 7

46

6.6

aIndicate that: student, daily labour

bIndicate that: Tigrie, Age, Negde woyito

Knowledge on obstetric danger signs

Severe vaginal bleeding was the most frequently identified ODS during pregnancy (81.6%), delivery (82.2%) and after delivery (85.3%). On the other hand convulsion was the least mentioned ODS during pregnancy (10%), delivery (7.3%) and after delivery (8.8%). Despite the problem few women knew retained placenta (59.6%) and prolonged labor (51.6%) as danger sign related to delivery (Table 2).
Table 2

Knowledge on obstetric danger signs during pregnancy, delivery and after delivery in Bahir Dar City, North West, Ethiopia, March, 2013 (n = 701)

Obstetric danger signs

Knowledge on obstetric danger sign

Pregnancy

Delivery

After delivery

n

%

n

%

n

%

Vaginal bleeding

572

81.6

576

82.2

598

85.3

Severe headache

151

21.5

157

24.4

136

19.4

Blurring of vision

157

22.4

  

134

19.1

Loss of consciousness

239

34.1

229

32.7

229

32.7

Swelling of face/hands

171

24.4

  

200

28.5

Convulsion

70

10

51

7.3

62

8.8

High grade fever

132

18.8

111

15.8

130

18.5

Difficulty in breathing

214

30.5

  

193

27.5

Severe weakness

127

18.1

  

113

16.1

Severe abdominal pain

105

15

  

137

19.5

Increase/decrease of fetal movement

229

32.7

    

Premature rupture membranes

146

20.8

    

Retained placenta

  

418

59.6

  

Prolonged labour

  

362

51.6

  

Offensive vaginal discharge

    

199

28.4

Knowledge on the key commonest obstetric danger signs

The respondents were able to mention two key ODSs related to child birth, 418 (59.6%) and 199 (28.4%) after delivery, only 157 (22.4%) of them identified two key ODSs during pregnancy. The overall result indicated that, 266 (37.9%) of the respondents were knowledgeable regarding to the key commonest ODSs.

Factors affecting knowledge on obstetric danger signs

The multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that Government employee [AOR = 2.75, 95% CI 1.38–5.49], merchants [AOR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.05–3.88], housewives [AOR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.25–3.68], women decision to seek medical care [AOR = 1.59, 95% CI 1.10–2.29] and timing in antenatal service utilization [AOR = 3.21, 95% CI 1.63–6.33] were statistically associated with knowledge on OSDs (Table 3).
Table 3

Bivariate and Multivariate analysis of predictors of knowledge on obstetric danger signs among mothers who gave within 1 year in Bahir Dar City, North west, Ethiopia, March, 2013 (n = 701)

Variables

Knowledge on danger sign

Yes

(n = 226)

No

(n = 435)

COR 95% CI

AOR 95% CI

Marital status

 Married/in union

227

376

1.65 (1.06, 2.55)

 

 Single/separated

39

59

  

Occupation status of the mother

 House wife

168

261

1.84 (1.14, 2.98)

2.15 (1.25, 3.68)**

 Merchant

39

59

1.89 (1.04, 3.44)

2.01 (1.05, 3.88)*

 G/employed

33

41

2.30 (1.22, 4.34)

2.75 (1.38, 5.49)**

 Others (student, daily laborer)

26

74

1

1

Family size

 1–4

157

276

0.70 (0.31, 1.57)

 

 5–6

91

131

0.38 (0.15, 0.94)

 

 ≥ 7

18

28

1

 

Final decision to seek care

 Respondent

129

164

1.57 (1.11, 2.21)

1.59 (1.10, 2.29)*

 Other family

137

271

1

1

Number of ANC visits

 0

24

45

1

 

 1

18

26

1.04 (0.48, 2.24)

 

 2

41

59

1.16 (0.46, 2.91)

 

 3

46

83

1.19 (0.62, 2.28)

 

 4

137

222

0.41 (0.18, 0.93)

 

Time of 1st ANC visits (n = 630)

(n = 206)

(n = 424)

  

1st trimester

99

235

1

1

2nd trimester

77

154

1.19 (0.83, 1.70)

1.31 (0.77, 2.24)

3rd trimester

31

34

2.16 (1.26, 3.72)

3.21 (1.63, 6.33)***

COR crudes odds ratio, AOR adjusted odds ratio

* Significant at P < 0.02; ** Significant at P < 0.01; *** Significant at P ≤ 0.001

Discussion

The overall result showed that 37.9% of the respondents were knowledgeable on the key commonest ODSs. This result is higher than study in Egypt (26%) [18]. The difference could be attributed to the time gap between the studies. Additional explanation could be the emphasis given by Ethiopian government in the last 5 years to improving maternal health services program.

In our study 22.4% of women were aware of at least two key ODSs during pregnancy. This finding is consistent with the study conducted in Pakistan (22%) [19]. However, the result of this study is lower than the studies done in Kenya (67%) [20], Tanzania (26%), and Uganda, 52% [21, 22]. The discrepancy might be related to operational definition given for knowledge on ODSs. In the previous studies a woman was considered knowledgeable if she answered at least one danger sign unlike our study in which at least two danger signs were required to consider knowledgeable.

The finding of this study indicated that 59.6% of mothers were aware of ODSs during childbirth. This is higher than the study done in Southern Ethiopia (41.3%) [16]. This difference could be due to the time gap of the studies and geographic difference; while this study was done in city administration whereas the previous study included the whole district in which the majorities were rural dwellers.

In this study 28.4% of women were aware on ODSs of postpartum period. This result is lower than the study result in Tanzania (40%) and Uganda (72%) [21, 22]. The difference could be attributed to the difference in geographical area, health care system and socio cultural factors.

Severe vaginal bleeding was the most frequently reported ODS during pregnancy (81.6%), labor (82.2%) and post-partum period (85.3%). This is consistent with studies done in Southern Ethiopia [16], Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan and Uganda [17, 22]. This could be related to the visible nature of severe vaginal bleeding which can be easily recognized by women. Despite the fact that prolonged labour is the top most cause of mortality in Ethiopia [13], however, low proportions of women (51.6%) were aware of prolonged labour in relative to severe vaginal bleeding. This could be due to cultural and religious beliefs. As many participants were Christians, they could view labour pain as the way God intended, so that they might remain at home for longer period.

Housewives, merchants and government employee were more likely to be knowledgeable than other occupations. This result was in line with the studies from Egypt and Zambia [19, 23]. Women who were authorized to seek medical care by their own decision were more likely to be knowledgeable than women for whom decision was made by other family members [P = 0.013]. This result was consistent with study finding in Uganda [22]. The correlation of decision power and knowledge could be due to high household asset owner ship of women in which they were not waiting for permission of the relatives and pocket of their husbands.

Those mothers who initiate first ANC on third trimester of pregnancy were more likely aware of ODSs than those women whose first ANC visit was on the first trimester of pregnancy [P = 0.001]. The possible explanation of this might be related to parity. In this study most women who start first ANC on third trimester were multiparous. Therefore, ANC and education in their previous pregnancies could have an effect. In addition, women could have given more attention for health information they got when they were near term.

Conclusion

Women had limited knowledge on ODSs during all three periods, more particularly during pregnancy. Low decision making power to seek care, early antenatal visit, being student and daily laborer, were among the predictors of lack of knowledge on ODSs. Therefore, there is critical need for provision of information on ODSs during the ANC period to facilitate the recognition on ODSs and access to skilled attendance services. We recommend that further studies need to be conducted to address all the three delays factors in a longitudinal approach.

Limitation

Being a cross sectional study we can’t test the effect of knowledge on better maternal and neonatal health outcome. Recall basis may be also the limitation of the study.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

AAN wrote the proposal, participated in the data collection, result interpretation and prepared manuscript. AAE and YMD participated in statistical analysis, result interpretation and prepared manuscript. EAM assisted with data analysis and interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Amhara regional health bureau to supported the study; additional thanks for field supervisors, data collectors and respondents. Also, our deep appreciation extends to Bahir Dar city administration and respective kebeles leaders for providing information with their full co-operation.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All relevant data are within the manuscript.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from Amhara Regional state health Bureau research and technology transfer core process. Permission was obtained from health office of the city administration and the respective Kebeles, and received their agreement before the onset of data collection. Then, written consent was obtained from each study participants. Strict confidentiality assured through anonymous recording and coding.

Funding

Amhara regional health bureau supported the study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    WHO. Promoting effective perinatal care. Essential antenatal, perinatal and postpartum care training module. WHO regional office for Europe. 2002.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Islam M, Yoshida S. Women are still deprived of access to lifesaving essential and emergency obstetric care. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009;106(2):120–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    WHO. Maternal mortality in 2005: estimates developed by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, and the World Bank 2007.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    JHPIEGO. Monitoring birth preparedness and complication readiness. Tools and indicators for maternal and newborn health. 2004.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khan K, Wojdyla D, Say L, Gülmezoglu A, Van Look P, Khan K, et al. WHO analysis of causes of maternal death: a systematic review. Lancet. 2006;367(9516):1066–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fotso J, Ezeh A, Oronje R. Provision and use of maternal health services among urban poor women in Kenya: what do we know and what can we do? J Urban Health. 2008;85:428–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Warren C. Opportunities for Africa’s newborn. Geneva: World Health organization; 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hogan M, Foreman K, Naghavi M, et al. Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008: a systematic analysis of progress towards Millennium Development Goal 5. Lancet. 2010;375:1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lawn J, Cousens S, Zupan J. Neonatal survival steering team: 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365(9462):891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lozano R, Wang H, Foreman K, Rajaratnam J, Naghavi M, Marcus J, et al. Progress towards Millennium Development Goals 4 and 5 on maternal and child mortality: an updated systematic analysis. Lancet. 2011;378(9797):1139–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    WHO. Trends in maternal mortality 1990–2010. Geneva: WHO; 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Central Statistical Authority, ORC Macro. Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey: 2005. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2005.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Central Statistical Authority, ORC Macro. Ethiopian Demographic and Health Survey: 2011. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 2012.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    HSDP III Independent Review Team. Ethiopia Health Sector Development Program (HSDPIII) Mid-Term Review, Volume I Component Report. Addis Ababa. 2008.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bahir Dar city administration statistical population size report, Bahir Dar Town, North West Ethiopia. 2010.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mesay H, Abebe G, Fessahaye A. Knowledge about obstetric danger signs among pregnant women in Aleta Wondo District, Sidama Zone, Southern Ethiopia. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2010;20(1):25–32.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wiegers TA, Boerma WGW, Haan Od. Birth preparedness and Maternity care in rural Kyrgyzstan and Tajikistan. Sex Reprod Health Care. 2010;1(4):1189–94.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wafaa AR, Rasha ME. Women’s awareness of danger signs of obstetrics complications. J Am Sci Alexandria Egypt. 2010;6(10):1299–306.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zaeem U, Assad H, Asifa K, David S. Birth preparedness and the role of the private sector: a community survey, in Gujranwala district, Pakistan. J Pak Med Assoc. 2009;59(5):303–4.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mutiso S, Qureshi Z, Kinuthia J. Birth preparedness among antenatal clients in Nairobi, Kenya. East Afr Med J. 2008;85(6):275–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pembe A, Urassa D, Carlstedt A, Lindmark G, Nyström L, Darj E. Rural Tanzanian women’s awareness of danger signs of obstetric complications. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2009;9:12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jerome K, Per-Olof Ö, Eleanor T, Karen O. Knowledge of obstetric danger signs and birth preparedness practices among women in rural Uganda. Reprod Health. 2011;8:33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nambala Brenda S. Knowledge and perception of women towards danger signs in pregnancy in Choma rural district, Zambia. Med J Zambia. 2013;40(2).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azezu Asres Nigussie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Amanu Aragaw Emiru
    • 2
  • Yeshalem Mulugeta Demilew
    • 3
  • Eleni Admassu Mersha
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health SciencesBahir Dar UniversityBahir DarEthiopia
  2. 2.Department of Reproductive Health, College of Medicine and Health SciencesBahir Dar UniversityBahir DarEthiopia
  3. 3.Department of Nutrition, College of Medicine and Health SciencesBahir Dar UniversityBahir DarEthiopia

Personalised recommendations