Advertisement

BMC Research Notes

, 11:882 | Cite as

Association between cesarean section and constipation in infants: the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS)

  • Taketoshi YoshidaEmail author
  • Kenta Matsumura
  • Akiko Tsuchida
  • Kei Hamazaki
  • Hidekuni Inadera
  • Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group
Open Access
Research note

Abstract

Objective

There have been increasing reports on the association between cesarean section (C-section) and the subsequent development of diseases in infants. C-section affects the diversity of microbiota in the infant’s gut. In the present study, we investigated the association between infants delivered by C-section and the development of constipation at 1 year old due to altered gut microbiota using data from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS).

Results

This cohort study (n = 83,019) used data from JECS, an ongoing cohort study which began in January 2011. Data on bowel movement and potential confounding factors were recorded. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the risk of C-section, and the results were expressed as risk ratios and their respective 95% confidence intervals. Although infants delivered by C-section were of significantly younger gestational age and lesser birth weight than vaginally delivered infants, the frequency of bowel movements was almost similar between the two, independent of the mode of delivery. The prevalence of constipation in the entire infant was 1.37%. No significant differences were observed for C-section in crude and adjusted risk ratios for constipation.

Keywords

Birth cohort Cesarean section Constipation Microbiota 

Abbreviations

JECS

Japan Environment and Children’s Study

C-section

cesarean section

Introduction

During the last few decades, there have been increasing number of reports on the association between cesarean section (C-section) and the development of diseases later in childhood. C-section has been associated with several diseases in infants, such as asthma, gastroenteritis, inflammatory bowel disease, celiac disease, type 1 diabetes mellitus, and obesity [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]. Because infants born by C-section are not exposed to the mother’s vaginal and intestinal microbiota, the microbiota in these infants is similar to the mother’s skin flora [6]. In mice, the first exposure to microorganisms seems to be important for gut microbiota and priming of the regulatory immune system [7]. Thus, the mode of delivery may be a crucial factor for infants in terms of the development of the immune system and subsequent incidence of disease.

Functional gastrointestinal disorders, such as infantile colic, gastroesophageal reflux, and constipation, may be caused by abnormal intestinal flora [8]. Disruption of the intestinal microbiota is considered an etiological factor in pediatric functional constipation [9]. We therefore hypothesized that infants delivered by C-section could show increased morbidity to constipation due to altered gut microbiota.

In the present study, we investigated the association between infants delivered by C-section and the development of constipation using data from the Japan Environment and Children’s Study (JECS).

Main text

Methods

In this study, data were obtained from JECS, an ongoing birth cohort study that commenced in January 2011. JECS was designed to investigate mothers and children using surveys until their newborns reached the age of 13 years. It is scheduled to continue up to 2027 and is measuring the effect of environmental factors on children’s health. The detailed methodology has been previously reported [10].

Briefly, pregnant women from 15 regions in Japan were recruited for 3 years from 2011 to 2014. The JECS protocol was approved by the Review Board on Epidemiological Studies of the Ministry of the Environment and by the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. JECS was conducted after obtaining written informed consent from all participants. A total of 103,062 pregnancies have participated in JECS (set jecs-an-20180131). After excluding multiple participation, multiple births, and miscarriages or still births, the remaining 92,790 women had singleton live births. Missing information about the mode of delivery or the infants’ defecation habit resulted in the exclusion of 9771 women; consequently, 83,019 participants were analyzed in the present study.

Follow-up was accomplished with self-administered questionnaires, which were completed at 1 month, 6 month and 1 year after birth. The questionnaires collected data related to the breastfeeding, stool condition, and confounding factors. Medical data were collected from the transcribed medical records and included gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery and maternal age. The rate of exclusive breastfeeding was determined at 1 month after birth. Constipation was defined as chronic fecal retention characterized by defecation frequency of < 3 per week at 1 year old.

Statistical analyses

The correlation between C-section and constipation in infants was assessed. A log-binomial regression model was used to estimate the crude risk, confounding-adjusted risk, and 95% confidence interval (CI) for C-section-delivered infants. The following potential factors were assessed for confounding-adjusted risk: Adjusted for maternal age, marital status, body mass index before pregnancy, employment status, total income, education, maternal allergy, exercise and total calorie intake during pregnancy, smoking and alcohol consumption after 1 month delivery, previous delivery, gestational age, birth weight, sex of the neonate, congenital anomaly of the neonate, passive smoking and feeding at 1 month birth, and nursing at 6 months. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Clinical characteristics of participants are shown in Table 1. C-section-delivered infants had younger gestational age and lesser birth weight than those of vaginally delivered infants (p < 0.001). The rate of exclusive breastfeeding was lower and maternal age was higher in the C-section group than in the vaginal delivery group (p < 0.001). The frequency of bowel movements is shown in Table 2. There was no difference between the groups at 1 year old. The prevalence of infant constipation in the entire cohort was 1.37%. Crude and adjusted risk ratios for constipation in C-section-delivered infants are shown in Table 3. No significant differences were observed between the two groups at 1 year old.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of subjects

 

Vaginal delivery

Cesarean delivery

p

N (male/female)

67,504 (34,643/32,861)

15,515 (7981/7534)

0.79

Gestational age, weeks

39.5 ± 1.3

38.2 ± 2.1

< 0.001

Birth weight, g

3060 ± 379

2869 ± 515

< 0.001

 Missing, n

14

  

Exclusively breast fed, n (%)

29,336 (43.5)

5499 (35.4)

< 0.001

 Missing, n

726

  

Maternal age, years

30.8 ± 4.9

32.5 ± 1.7

< 0.001

 Missing, n

443

  

Gestational age, Maternal age: mean And standard deviation

Table 2

Frequent bowel movement

 

Vaginal delivery (n = 67, 504)

Cesarean delivery (n = 15,515)

n (%)

n (%)

Frequency (week)

 0–2

940 (1.4)

198 (1.3)

 3–6

7934 (11.8)

1737 (11.2)

 7–14

49,567 (73.4)

11,359 (73.2)

 ≥ 15

9063 (13.4)

2221 (14.3)

Table 3

Crude and adjusted risk ratios for constipation

 

Crude (n = 83,019)

Adjusted (n = 71,489)a

OR

(95% CI)

p value

OR

(95% CI)

p value

Cesarean delivery

1.09

(0.94, 1.28)

0.26

0.94

(0.79, 1.13)

0.51

CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio

aAdjusted for maternal age, marital status, body mass index before pregnancy, employment status, total income, education, maternal allergy, exercise and total calorie intake during pregnancy, smoking and alcohol consumption after 1 month delivery, previous delivery, gestational age, birth weight, sex of the neonate, congenital anomaly of the neonate, passive smoking and feeding at 1 month birth, and nursing at 6 months

Discussion

In the present study, C-section was not associated with constipation in infants. This is the first report which addresses the direct association between cesarean section and constipation in infants. Because infants born by C-section have a less diverse gut flora [6, 7], we expected that they would tend to show constipation. However, the frequency of bowel movement was the same for both the groups (Table 2). Most instances of constipation in infants occurred at the time of transition from breastfeeding to consumption of infant formula [11]. Mothers who delivered by C-section had lower rates of exclusive breastfeeding than those who delivered vaginally (Table 1). Bowel movements were analyzed by excluding the mode of feeding (breastfeeding or infant formula) to demonstrate the effect of the mode of delivery.

Although there are several definitions of constipation, bowel movement of < 3 per week is acceptable in infants [12]. In the present study, the rate of constipation (< 3 week) was 1.37%, which is considerably lower than Western countries (Italy, 17.6% [11]; USA, 5% [13]). The prevalence of infants’ constipation has been reported range 0.05% to 0.3% in Thailand which is low rate like Japan [14]. The large variation in prevalence of constipation may be due to different country and food culture. This low rate of constipation in Japanese infants may have resulted in no differences between the groups in present study.

Conclusion

This study showed that C-section has no effect on the frequency of bowel movement in infants at 1 year old.

Limitations

Our study had several limitations. First, there were differences in the backgrounds of the two groups (Table 1). C-section-delivered infants were younger and had lesser birth weight than vaginally delivery infants, which may have resulted in differences in bowel maturation. However, Iacono et al. found that preterm birth is not associated with constipation [11]. Second, regarding the timing of analysis, there is a wide range of age with respect to the onset of constipation [12]. A diagnosis of constipation was made at 1 year of age in this study. Most studies evaluate the prevalence of constipation in children between 2 and 14 years of age [15, 16, 17]. The onset of constipation occurs within the first year of life in almost 50% of the affected children [18]. To investigate the effect of C-section on constipation, further studies will be required to determine the prevalence of constipation across different age groups.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

TY, KM, HI and AT designed the study. KM, KH and AT analyzed and interpreted the data. TY KM, and AT wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to the critical revision of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to all participants of this study, and all individuals involved in data collection.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The data used to derive our conclusions are unsuitable for public deposition due to ethical restrictions and specific legal framework in Japan. The Ethical Guidelines for Epidemiological Research enforced by the Japan Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology and the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare also restricts the open sharing of epidemiological data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The JECS protocol was approved by the Review Board of the Ministry of the Environment for epidemiological studies, and by the Ethics Committees of all participating institutions. The JECS is conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and other nationally valid regulations, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Funding

JECS was funded by the Ministry of the Environment, Japan. The findings and conclusions of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not represent the official views of government. The funding bodies had no role in the study design, collection and analysis of data, interpretation of results, writing of the manuscript, or decision to publish.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Kuhle S, Tong OS, Woolcott CG. Association between caesarean section and childhood obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2015;16:295–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kristensen K, Henriksen L. Cesarean section and disease associated with immune function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137:587–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bager P, Simonsen J, Nielsen NM, Frisch M. Cesarean section and offspring’s risk of inflammatory bowel disease: a national cohort study. Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2012;18:857–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Decker E, Engelmann G, Findeisen A, Gerner P, Laass M, Ney D, et al. Cesarean delivery is associated with celiac disease but not inflammatory bowel disease in children. Pediatrics. 2010;125:e1433–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cardwell CR, Stene LC, Joner G, Cinek O, Svensson J, Goldacre MJ, et al. Caesarean section is associated with an increased risk of childhood-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetologia. 2008;51:726–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dominguez-Bello MG, Costello EK, Contreras M, Magris M, Hidalgo G, Fierer N, et al. Delivery mode shapes the acquisition and structure of the initial microbiota across multiple body habitats in newborns. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2010;107:11971–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hansen CH, Andersen LS, Krych L, Metzdorff SB, Hasselby JP, Skov S, et al. Mode of delivery shapes gut colonization pattern and modulates regulatory immunity in mice. J Immunol. 2014;193:1213–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Indrio F, Di Mauro A, Di Mauro A, Riezzo G, Panza R, Cavallo L, et al. Prevention of functional gastrointestinal disorders in neonates: clinical and socioeconomic impact. Benef Microbes. 2015;6:195–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    de Meij TG, de Groot EF, Eck A, Budding AE, Kneepkens CM, Benninga MA, et al. Characterization of microbiota in children with chronic functional constipation. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0164731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kawamoto T, Nitta H, Murata K, Toda E, Tsukamoto N, Hasegawa M, et al. Rationale and study design of the Japan environment and children’s study (JECS). BMC Public Health. 2014;14:25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Iacono G, Merolla R, D’Amico D, Bonci E, Cavataio F, Di Prima L, et al. Gastrointestinal symptoms in infancy: a population-based prospective study. Dig Liver Dis. 2005;37:432–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    van den Berg MM, Benninga MA, Di Lorenzo C. Epidemiology of childhood constipation: a systematic review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:2401–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van Tilburg MA, Hyman PE, Walker L, Rouster A, Palsson OS, Kim SM, et al. Prevalence of functional gastrointestinal disorders in infants and toddlers. J Pediatr. 2015;166:684–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osatakul S, Puetpaiboon A. Use of Rome II versus Rome III criteria for diagnosis of functional constipation in young children. Pediatr Int. 2014;56:83–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yong D, Beattie RM. Normal bowel habit and prevalence of constipation in primary-school children. Ambul Child Health. 1998;4:277–82.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kajiwara M, Inoue K, Usui A, Kurihara M, Usui T. The micturition habits and prevalence of daytime urinary incontinence in Japanese primary school children. J Urol. 2004;171:403–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Issenman RM, Hewson S, Pirhonen D, Taylor W, Tirosh A. Are chronic digestive complaints the result of abnormal dietary patterns? Diet and digestive complaints in children at 22 and 40 months of age. Am J Dis Child. 1987;141:679–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Del Ciampo IR, Galvão LC, Del Ciampo LA, Fernandes MI. Prevalence of chronic constipation in children at a primary health care unit. J Pediatr. 2002;78:497–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Taketoshi Yoshida
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kenta Matsumura
    • 2
  • Akiko Tsuchida
    • 2
    • 3
  • Kei Hamazaki
    • 2
    • 3
  • Hidekuni Inadera
    • 2
    • 3
  • Japan Environment and Children’s Study Group
  1. 1.Division of Neonatology, Maternal and Perinatal CenterToyama University HospitalToyamaJapan
  2. 2.Toyama Regional Center for JECSUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Public Health, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of ToyamaToyamaJapan

Personalised recommendations