Advertisement

Parasites & Vectors

, 12:518 | Cite as

Whole-genome sequencing of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis isolates from Gadarif State, Sudan

  • Abdulazeem Abdulsalam Ibrahim AlkhidirEmail author
  • Martin J. Holland
  • Wafa Ibrahim Elhag
  • Charlotte A. Williams
  • Judith Breuer
  • Abdah Elfatih Elemam
  • Khalid Mohamed Khalid El Hussain
  • Mohammed Elfatih Hussein Ournasseir
  • Harry Pickering
Open Access
Research
  • 85 Downloads
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. The LCNTDR Collection: Advances in scientific research for NTD control

Abstract

Background

Trachoma, caused by ocular Chlamydia trachomatis, is the leading infectious cause of blindness worldwide. Sudan first reported trachoma in the 1930s and has since been consistently endemic. Ocular C. trachomatis previously isolated from trachoma patients in Sudan in 1963 was antigenically identical to an isolate from Saudi Arabia (A/SA1). No contemporary ocular C. trachomatis whole genome sequences have been reported from Sudan.

Methods

This study sequenced twenty ocular C. trachomatis isolates to improve understanding of pathogen diversity in North-East Africa and examine for genomic variation specific to Sudan, possibly related to the persistence of trachoma in surveyed communities. High quality, whole genome sequences were obtained from 12/20 isolates.

Results

All isolates were serovar A and had tarP and trpA sequences typical of classical, ocular C. trachomatis isolates. The Sudanese isolates formed a closely related subclade within the T2-trachoma clade of C. trachomatis phylogeny distinct from geographically disparate ocular isolates, with little intra-population diversity. We found 333 SNPs that were conserved in Sudanese ocular isolates but rare compared to other ocular C. trachomatis populations, which were focused in two genomic loci (CTA0172-CTA0173 and CTA0482).

Conclusions

Limited intra-population diversity and geographical clustering of ocular C. trachomatis suggests minimal transmission between and slow diversification within trachoma-endemic communities. However, diversity may have been higher pre-treatment in these communities. Over-representation of Sudan-specific SNPs in three genes suggests they may have an impact on C. trachomatis growth and transmission in this population.

Keywords

Trachoma Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis Genomics Whole-genome sequencing 

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis is one of the most common sexually transmitted infections worldwide and the leading infectious cause of blindness. Trachoma, caused by ocular C. trachomatis infection, is targeted for elimination by 2020 [1]. Trachoma was first formally described in Sudan in the 1930s [2] and sporadic reports since then [3], including a review of records from 1959 to 1969 [4], indicated trachoma as a public health problem. In Sudan, the causative agent was first isolated from conjunctival scrapings in the 1960s and then again in the 1970s [5, 6], with noted antigenic identity to an historical isolate from Saudi Arabia [7]. In 2011, approximately 100,000 participants were surveyed across the northern states of Sudan [8]. This study identified 14/88 districts requiring antibiotics, facial cleanliness and environmental improvement interventions for trachomatous inflammation, follicular (TF) and 20/88 districts requiring surgery intervention for trachomatous trichiasis (TT). Continued trachoma surveillance and community-level administration of azithromycin have since been undertaken by the Sudanese Ministry of Health as part of the Global Trachoma Mapping Project.

Until recently, few complete genome sequences of ocular C. trachomatis have been available [9, 10, 11]. Reduced cost and improvements in technique [12, 13, 14] have seen a significant increase in whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of C. trachomatis; however, most studies have not investigated the relationship between sequence variation and clinical outcomes [15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21]. Studies that have examined this link have invariably focussed on urogenital isolates [22, 23, 24]. In 2018, we published a study from Bijagos Islands, Guinea-Bissau that used a genome-wide association study of 81 ocular C. trachomatis isolates to identify genomic markers of disease severity in trachoma [25]; this study suggested there is C. trachomatis genomic diversity within populations and that it may be linked to clinical outcomes.

Despite the high prevalence of trachoma, no studies have sequenced C. trachomatis isolates from Sudan. Trachoma was endemic in the Gadarif districts of Algalabat Eastern (TF: 19.8%; TT: 1.9%) and Alrahad (TF: 7.1%; TT: 4.8%) in 2011. Six and four mass annual rounds of azithromycin, respectively, have had limited impact on trachoma endemicity in these districts, according to the Global Trachoma Atlas (http://www.trachomaatlas.org). A cross-sectional population-based survey was undertaken in these districts to determine the prevalence of active trachoma and ocular C. trachomatis infection, as well as the burden of common, nasopharyngeal non-chlamydial pathogens. This study sequenced twenty C. trachomatis isolates from the survey in these Sudanese trachoma-endemic districts to characterise ocular C. trachomatis genomic diversity.

Methods

Study design and population

A descriptive cross-sectional population-based trachoma prevalence study was conducted to determine the prevalence of C. trachomatis and active trachoma (TF and/or trachomatous inflammation, intense [TI]) after multiple annual rounds of mass drug administration (MDA) with azithromycin. The studies were undertaken in Jarmai and Gargosha villages of Alrahad District and Alsaraf Alahmar (Bawi East, Bawi West, Bawi South and Bawi Centre) and Saraf Tabaldia villages of Algalabat Eastern District, Gadarif State during the period from November 2016 to April 2019. A total of 3529 children aged 1–9 years were examined for signs of active trachoma.

Trachoma clinical diagnosis

Examination for trachoma signs was conducted by ophthalmic medical assistants trained in the WHO simplified grading system. Each eye was examined for TF and TI. Both eyes were examined and findings for the worst affected eye recorded. Alcohol was used to clean the examiner’s fingers between examinations. Individuals with signs of active trachoma (TF and/or TI) were offered free treatment with antibiotics according to the national guidelines.

Sample collection and processing

Four-hundred and nine samples were collected from children clinically diagnosed as having active trachoma (TF and/or TI). Two conjunctival samples were collected from each participant by four passes of a Dacron polyester swab with a one-quarter turn between passes. Swabs were stored in UTM transport media (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hemel Hempstead, UK) and stored at − 20 °C until processing. Total genomic DNA was extracted from samples using the G-spin Total DNA kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea).

Detection and quantitation of C. trachomatis

A previously validated assay [26, 27] targeting the highly conserved, C. trachomatis-specific genomic omcB was adapted for use in an end-point PCR to identify C. trachomatis-positive samples. Chlamydial DNA from clinical samples was amplified using a conventional PCR machine (SensoQuest, Gränningen, Germany), using Maxime PCR Pre Mix kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seongnam, Korea) and primers at 900 nM. Amplification was performed in 30 μl reaction volumes containing 2 μl of template DNA. Cycle conditions were as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, 59.9 °C for 30 s, 72 °C for 2 min. PCR products were subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis. A result was considered positive for C. trachomatis when a band of the size 106 bp was visible in the gel. Twenty C. trachomatis-positive samples were further tested using an in-house, quantitative ddPCR assay. This assay quantifies both C. trachomatis plasmid and genome (omcB); C. trachomatis load was defined as genome copies per µl.

Sequencing, processing and analysis of C. trachomatis

DNA was enriched using SureSelect C. trachomatis-specific baits and sequenced on the Illumina NextSeq platform as previously described [20, 25]. Raw reads were trimmed and filtered using Trimmomatic [28]. Filtered reads were aligned to a reference genome (A/Har13) with Bowtie2 [29], variant calls were identified with SAMtools/BCFtools [30]. Multiple genome and plasmid alignments were generated using progressiveMauve, multiple gene alignments were generated using muscle. Phylogenies were computed using RaxML [31] and visualised in R. Domain structure of tarP and truncation of trpA were characterised as previously described [25]. Multi-locus sequences types (MLST) were determined from filtered reads using stringMLST [32] and the hr-MLST-6 database [33]. Minimum-spanning trees were constructed using BioNumerics 7.6 created by Applied Maths NV (http://www.applied-maths.com). The discriminatory power of the MLST types was evaluated using Simpson’s discriminatory index as previously described [34]. Pairwise nucleotide diversity was calculated as previously described [25]. ABRicate and the ResFinder database (https://github.com/tseemann/abricate) were used to test for the presence of antimicrobial resistance genes.

Identification of polymorphisms associated with Sudanese origin

The Sudanese C. trachomatis isolates were compared to a global population of ocular isolates (n = 166 [15, 17, 20, 21, 25]) to identify polymorphisms associated with Sudanese origin. Sites with a major allele frequency of < 0.8 within the twelve Sudanese isolates and a frequency > 0.2 of the Sudan-conserved alleles within the global population were excluded. Annotations were transferred from the ocular reference genome A/Har13.

Results

Demographic information

Twenty C. trachomatis-positive samples of sufficient load by ddPCR quantitation of omcB load were available for whole-genome sequencing (WGS), from seven villages across two districts of Sudan (Additional file 1: Table S1). All individuals had TF of which 13/20 also had TI. Age and gender were not associated with concurrent TF and TI.

Sequencing results

Sequencing was successful for all 20 samples (Additional file 1: Table S2), a median of 1.87 × 106 reads were obtained (95% CI: 1.48 × 106–2.50 × 106). A median of 3.73 × 105 reads aligned to the reference genomes, A/HAR-13 (95% CI: 0.09 × 105–17.84 × 105). Based on genome coverage of > 98% and a minimum read depth of 10 there were twelve samples for post-sequencing analysis. Chlamydia trachomatis infection load was generally lower in 8/20 samples that did not meet these quality control criteria (mean load 444 omcB copies/µl and 1861 omcB copies/µl in excluded and included samples respectively). However, two samples from this study with less than 50 omcB copies/µl returned high quality sequences, therefore load cannot completely explain sequencing quality. Median read depth of the twelve high quality sequences included in the post-sequencing analysis was 308 (95% CI: 59.9–511.2).

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of the twelve whole-genome sequences placed them into a closely grouped sub-clade within the T2-trachoma clade (Fig. 1), the closest existing sequences were a sub-clade collected from the Bijagos Islands, Guinea-Bissau in 2012. Plasmid phylogeny showed similar close grouping of the isolates within the trachoma clade (Additional file 2: Figure S1).
Fig. 1

Maximum likelihood reconstruction of whole genome phylogeny of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis sequences from Sudan. Whole genome and plasmid phylogeny of 12 C. trachomatis sequences from Sudan and 188 Ct clinical and reference strains. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences were mapped to C. trachomatis A/HAR-13 using Bowtie2. SNPs were called using SAMtools/BCFtools. Phylogenies were computed with RAxML from a variable sites alignment using a GTR + gamma model and are midpoint rooted. The scale-bar indicates evolutionary distance. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences generated in the present study are coloured green, and reference strains are coloured by tissue localization (blue, ocular; yellow, urogenital; purple, LGV)

All twelve sequences were ompA serovar A (Fig. 2). Seven polymorphic sites were present in ompA across nine sequences, leading to four amino acid changes (Table 1). Two sequences contained a single amino acid deletion. The closest related ompA sequences by blast+ alignment were A/SA1 (3/12) and A/HAR-13 (9/12).
Fig. 2

Maximum likelihood reconstruction of ompA phylogeny of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis sequences from Sudan. Phylogeny of ompA from 12 C. trachomatis sequences from Sudan and 188 C. trachomatis clinical and reference strains. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences were mapped to C. trachomatis A/HAR-13 using Bowtie2. SNPs were called using SAMtools/BCFtools. Phylogenies were computed with RAxML from a variable sites alignment using a GTR + gamma model and are midpoint rooted. The scale-bar indicates evolutionary distance. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences generated in the present study are coloured green, and reference strains are coloured by tissue localization (blue, ocular; yellow, urogenital; purple, LGV)

Table 1

Identified ompA polymorphisms

Sequences affected

Nucleotide change

Amino acid change

Protein region

B1, J52

305C>T

na

na

A8

349G>A

D117N

Surface exposed

B1, J52

736A>G

na

na

T94, TF16, TF34

743C>T

A248V

Surface exposed

J52

1000T>G

S334A

Membranous

B13

1007A>G

T337A

Surface exposed

A8, TF54

1007_1009del

na

na

TF34

1011A>C

na

na

Abbreviation: na, the polymorphism did not lead to an amino acid change and therefore did not affect any region of the protein

MLST analysis, including ompA (hr-MLST-6), identified four novel sequence types (ST) with a Simpson’s discriminatory index of 0.67. A minimum spanning tree including all available ocular ST showed clustering of Sudanese isolates, with little evidence for village-level resolution (Fig. 3). Pairwise nucleotide diversity using WGS data was 0.0014. All sequences had tarP domain structure (four actin-binding domains and three tyrosine-repeat regions) and truncated trpA (531del) typical of ocular strains. One sequence had an insertion in trpA (115_116AG in B9) which led to an earlier truncation. There was no evidence for the presence of macrolide resistance alleles.
Fig. 3

Minimum spanning tree of hr-MLST-6 types of Chlamydia trachomatis sequences from Sudan. Twelve C. trachomatis sequences from Sudan and 136 ocular C. trachomatis clinical and reference strains were used to construct a minimum spanning tree of hr-MLST-6 types. Multi-locus sequence types were determined using stringMLST. Minimum spanning trees were constructed using BioNumerics 7.6. Sudanese sequence types are coloured by village of origin, clinical and reference strains are coloured by country of origin

A comparison of the Sudanese sequences with 166 previously sequenced samples from trachoma-endemic communities [15, 17, 20, 21, 25] identified genomic markers specific to Sudan. After filtering, 333 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across 178 sequences were found to be conserved in Sudan (allele frequency ≥ 0.8) and rare in the global population (allele frequency ≤ 0.2). SNPs were dispersed throughout the genome, with two foci in the genes CTA0164-CTA0179 and CTA482-CTA499 (Fig. 4). Within these focal regions, CTA0482 (D/UW3; CT442) contained 19 SNPs, CTA0172 and CTA0173 (D/UW3; both CT163) contained 20 SNPs. A further cluster of SNPs was located between CTA_0777 and CTA_0801, the SNPs in this region were not overrepresented in any individual gene.
Fig. 4

Single nucleotide polymorphisms on the Chlamydia trachomatis genome specific to Sudan (n = 333). Single nucleotide polymorphisms conserved in Sudan (allele frequency ≥ 0.8) and rare in other C. trachomatis isolates (allele frequency ≤ 0.2) were identified by comparing these C. trachomatis sequences (n = 12) to ocular isolates from other populations (n = 166). Two loci (CTA0172-CTA0173 and CTA0482) which harboured the majority of Sudan-specific alleles are indicated (blue boxes)

Discussion

This study successfully sequenced twelve recent ocular C. trachomatis samples from a trachoma-endemic region of Sudan with no prior characterisation of chlamydial genomics. All sequences were phylogenetically within the T2-trachoma clade and contained ompA, tarP and trpA sequences typical of classical ocular strains. The Sudanese sequences were phylogenetically distinct from trachoma sequences collected in geographically disparate sites. This study found 333 alleles conserved within Sudan and rare within the global ocular C. trachomatis population were focussed in two distinct genomic regions. There was no evidence of macrolide resistance alleles in the C. trachomatis population.

All sequences were genovar A by ompA typing with a high level of conservation, historically this has been the most prevalent ocular ompA type in sub-Saharan Africa [15, 25, 35, 36, 37]. Whilst three quarters of non-synonymous SNPs in ompA were within surface-exposed domains, none were within reported antigenic sites [38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44]. Sequence variation in tarP and the tryptophan operon are also ocular clade-specific. There were ten unique tarP sequences in this population, all coded for the domain structure typical of ocular isolates, specifically four actin-binding domains and three tyrosine-repeat regions [45]. The sequence of trpA was highly conserved, 11 out of 12 identical sequences had a truncating deletion and one had a truncating insertion. Therefore, all of the Sudanese sequences had a non-functional tryptophan operon, thought to be restrictive to growth in the urogenital tract [46, 47]. These features and branching of the Sudanese sequences within the classical T2-trachoma clade suggests they are typical ocular strains. Results of the comparison to a global population of C. trachomatis sequences, aimed at identifying Sudan-specific polymorphisms, supported this assertion. Only 333 alleles conserved within Sudan and rare within the global population were found, of which only two were unique to the Sudanese sequences. Two genes, CTA0172-CTA0173 and CTA0482, harboured > 10% of these alleles. Both encoded proteins have been associated with lipid droplets in C. trachomatis-infected cells in vitro, targeting of which is thought to enhance C. trachomatis survival and replication [48, 49]. It is possible that altered expression or activity of these genes may impact the growth and survival of these Sudanese ocular strains.

Pairwise nucleotide diversity is a measure of the extent of polymorphism within a population, a higher value indicating increased polymorphism. Pairwise diversity reported from studies of ocular C. trachomatis from different trachoma-endemic communities has produced contrasting results, with those sequences originating directly from ocular swabs being significantly more variable at the population level than those derived from repeatedly passaged cultured isolates. The pairwise diversity in this population was 0.0014, which is higher than isolates from Rombo, Tanzania [50] but lower than found in the Bijagos Islands, Guinea-Bissau [51]. This supports our previous assertion that in vitro passage of isolates prior to sequencing, influences sequence diversity. This suggests that in the future, when possible, C. trachomatis samples should be sequenced directly from clinical samples.

MLST analysis has been evaluated extensively in urogenital C. trachomatis, with evidence suggesting it may be a useful tool for determining diversity in a population [52]. Only one study has investigated its utility in ocular C. trachomatis and it focussed on a small number of strains [53], primarily historical reference isolates. Our study identified five novel sequence types. Simpson’s discriminatory index, which calculates the probability of two randomly sampled strains in a population being the same ST, has been used to evaluate the discriminatory power of MLST schemes. The five novel ST identified in this study had a discriminatory index of 0.67, considerably below the suggested threshold of 0.90 for high confidence that the typing system is of sufficient resolution [34]. This was supported by close clustering and overlap of ST between villages from separate districts. The discriminatory index for Sudanese samples is slightly less than that calculated from a global population of trachoma isolates (0.772) and considerably lower than that for a global population of urogenital isolates (0.968) [53]. This is unsurprising as the metric was designed for “large and representative (nonlocal) collections of distinct strains” [34]. The MLST scheme applied in this analysis, which targets five non-housekeeping genes and approximately half of the sequence of ompA, provided lower resolution in this case than full-length ompA alone (discriminatory index of 0.773). High levels of recombination in and around ompA has led others to suggest it is an unsuitable target for molecular epidemiological characterisation of C. trachomatis isolates [17], supporting the greater use of WGS and need for exploration of novel MLST systems.

Considering the lack of diversity within the Sudanese sequences, the clear phylogenetic separation from geographically disparate populations of ocular C. trachomatis whole genome sequences is striking. This mirrors previous findings from Guinea-Bissau [25], Tanzania [17] and the Solomon Islands [20], suggesting this geographical clustering of sequences is a common feature of ocular C. trachomatis. The sequences from Guinea-Bissau (beginning with 11151, 13108 or 9471) are the largest published collection of ocular C. trachomatis yet still split into only two sub-clades, one of which branched phylogenetically close to the C. trachomatis sequenced in this study. The close relatedness of the Sudanese sequences, collected in 2018, to an isolate collected in Saudi Arabia in 1957 (A/SA1) is even more remarkable. A similar phylogenetic relatedness was found for two isolates collected in The Gambia over 20 years apart (B/Jali-20 and B-M48). These findings suggest slow and geography-related diversification of ocular C. trachomatis, with little evidence of transmission between geographically separate trachoma-endemic communities. This may be because C. trachomatis is a successful, well-adapted pathogen requiring little further adaptation to maintain within a population or that country/region-specific pressures may be driving adaptation. It is also possible that diversity of C. trachomatis in these regions of Sudan had been reduced by prior mass community-level treatment. Although, despite repeated rounds of treatment and consistent with previous studies, no evidence of macrolide resistance was found in this population. This supports results from ompA typing of C. trachomatis samples pre- and post-treatment that found no difference in diversity [54].

Thus far no study has published whole-genome sequence data from ocular C. trachomatis samples collected pre- and post-treatment in the same community. However, studies of ocular C. trachomatis sequences have found no change in azithromycin susceptibility after treatment [55, 56, 57]. This supports the absence of macrolide resistance genes in our sequences from Sudan. Azithromycin is known to effectively clear infections at the individual level, but ocular C. trachomatis often persists in communities even after multiple rounds of treatment [58, 59]. This is likely due to a combination of factors, including baseline levels of infection, environmental improvements and treatment coverage. It is possible that genomic factors may support continued transmission of C. trachomatis after treatment, even in the absence of genes that directly inhibit macrolide activity. Genes with critical functions that promote C. trachomatis survival and replication may lead to a higher pre-treatment load of infection, reducing the likelihood of complete clearance, or enhance emergence of post-treatment residual infections. Additionally, there is the possibility of indirect resistance in which a resistant population of bacteria can provide protection for a susceptible population [60].

Conclusions

This first WGS study of ocular C. trachomatis from trachoma-endemic regions of Sudan identified typical T2-trachoma isolates with low intra-population diversity and remarkable similarity to a reference C. trachomatis strain collected in Saudi Arabia 60 years previously. There was no evidence of macrolide resistance alleles in our C. trachomatis sequences from post-treatment communities, however, two foci of polymorphism specific to these populations were identified. A greater sample size and pre-treatment samples are required to reliably investigate if genomic diversity is related to population treatment success. The phylogenetic clustering of sequences by country of collection warrants further investigation to understand the evolutionary history of ocular C. trachomatis.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the study participants and field team in Sudan. We would like to acknowledge Professor Muntaser El Tayeb Ibrahim from the Institute of Endemic Disease, University of Khartoum for granting us his laboratory time and facilities. The authors also acknowledge the infrastructure support provided by the UCL/UCLH Biomedical Research Centre funded Pathogen Genomics Unit.

Authors’ contributions

AAIA, MJH, WIE and HP conceived and designed the study and prepared the manuscript. AAIA performed the sample collection. AAIA, CAW, JB, AEE and HP performed the laboratory work. AAIA, MJH and HP analysed the data. KMKEH and MEHO helped in study implementation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

HP and MJH were funded by the EU Horizon 2020 grant agreement ID: 733373.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study and its procedures were approved by the Sudan Government/Federal Ministry of Health/National Health Research Ethics Committee and Al-Neelain University research ethics committee. Verbal consent was obtained from community leaders, children or participants’ guardians on their behalf. During the survey, all children with trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) and/or trachomatous inflammation-intense (TI) were treated with a single height-based dose of oral azithromycin in accordance with WHO and national protocols.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

13071_2019_3770_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Patient demographics. Table S2. Chlamydia trachomatis detection and sequencing.
13071_2019_3770_MOESM2_ESM.tiff (382 kb)
Additional file 2: Figure S1. Maximum likelihood reconstruction of plasmid phylogeny of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis sequences from Sudan. Plasmid phylogeny of 12 C. trachomatis sequences from Sudan and 188 Ct clinical and reference strains. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences were mapped to C. trachomatis A/HAR-13 using Bowtie2. SNPs were called using SAMtools/BCFtools. Phylogenies were computed with RAxML from a variable sites alignment using a GTR + gamma model and are midpoint rooted. The scale-bar indicates evolutionary distance. Sudanese C. trachomatis sequences in this study are coloured green, and reference strains are coloured by tissue localization (blue, ocular; yellow, urogenital; purple, LGV).

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Assembly. Global Elimination of Blinding Trachoma. 51st World Health Assembly, Geneva, 16 May 1998, Resolution WHA51, vol. 11. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1998.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Maccallan AF. Trachoma in the British colonial empire. Its relation to blindness; the existing means of relief; means of prophylaxis. Br J Ophthalmol. 1934;18:625–45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Majcuk JF. A study of trachoma and associated infections in the Sudan. Bull World Health Organ. 1966;35:262–72.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Salim AR, Sheikh HA. Trachoma in the Sudan. An epidemiological study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59:600–4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Harper IA. Isolation of trachoma virus in the Sudan. Lancet. 1963;2:438–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Salim AR, Sheikh HA. Trachoma in the Sudan. A laboratory study. Br J Ophthalmol. 1975;59:435–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murray ES, Bell SD Jr, Hanna AT, Nichols RL, Snyder JC. Studies on trachoma. 1. Isolation and identification of strains of elementary bodies from Saudi Arabia and Egypt. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1960;9:116–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hassan A, Ngondi JM, King JD, Elshafie BE, Al Ginaid G, Elsanousi M, et al. The prevalence of blinding trachoma in northern states of Sudan. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2011;5:e1027.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stephens RS, Kalman S, Lammel C, Fan J, Marathe R, Aravind L, et al. Genome sequence of an obligate intracellular pathogen of humans: Chlamydia trachomatis. Science. 1998;282:754–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Carlson JH, Porcella SF, McClarty G, Caldwell HD. Comparative genomic analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis oculotropic and genitotropic strains. Infect Immun. 2005;73:6407–18.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Thomson NR, Holden MT, Carder C, Lennard N, Lockey SJ, Marsh P, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis: genome sequence analysis of lymphogranuloma venereum isolates. Genome Res. 2008;18:161–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Seth-Smith HM, Harris SR, Skilton RJ, Radebe FM, Golparian D, Shipitsyna E, et al. Whole-genome sequences of Chlamydia trachomatis directly from clinical samples without culture. Genome Res. 2013;23:855–66.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Christiansen MT, Brown AC, Kundu S, Tutill HJ, Williams R, Brown JR, et al. Whole-genome enrichment and sequencing of Chlamydia trachomatis directly from clinical samples. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:591.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown AC, Christiansen MT. Whole-genome enrichment using RNA probes and sequencing of Chlamydia trachomatis directly from clinical samples. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1616:1–22.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Harris SR, Clarke IN, Seth-Smith HM, Solomon AW, Cutcliffe LT, Marsh P, et al. Whole-genome analysis of diverse Chlamydia trachomatis strains identifies phylogenetic relationships masked by current clinical typing. Nat Genet. 2012;44:413–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    O’Neill CE, Seth-Smith HM, Van Der Pol B, Harris SR, Thomson NR, Cutcliffe LT, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis clinical isolates identified as tetracycline resistant do not exhibit resistance in vitro: whole-genome sequencing reveals a mutation in porB but no evidence for tetracycline resistance genes. Microbiology. 2013;159:748–56.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hadfield J, Harris SR, Seth-Smith HMB, Parmar S, Andersson P, Giffard PM, et al. Comprehensive global genome dynamics of Chlamydia trachomatis show ancient diversification followed by contemporary mixing and recent lineage expansion. Genome Res. 2017;27:1220–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peters RPH, Doyle R, Redelinghuys MJ, McIntyre JA, Verjans GM, Breuer J, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis Biovar L2 infection in women in South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2017;23:1913–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Eder T, Kobus S, Stallmann S, Stepanow S, Kohrer K, Hegemann JH, et al. Genome sequencing of Chlamydia trachomatis serovars E and F reveals substantial genetic variation. Pathog Dis. 2017;75:ftx120.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Butcher RM, Sokana O, Jack K, Macleod CK, Marks ME, Kalae E, et al. Low prevalence of conjunctival infection with Chlamydia trachomatis in a treatment-naive trachoma-endemic region of the Solomon Islands. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10:e0004863.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Andersson P, Harris SR, Seth Smith HM, Hadfield J, O’Neill C, Cutcliffe LT, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis from Australian Aboriginal people with trachoma are polyphyletic composed of multiple distinctive lineages. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10688.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jeffrey BM, Suchland RJ, Quinn KL, Davidson JR, Stamm WE, Rockey DD. Genome sequencing of recent clinical Chlamydia trachomatis strains identifies loci associated with tissue tropism and regions of apparent recombination. Infect Immun. 2010;78:2544–53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Suchland RJ, Dimond ZE, Putman TE, Rockey DD. Demonstration of persistent infections and genome stability by whole-genome sequencing of repeat-positive, same-serovar Chlamydia trachomatis collected from the female genital tract. J Infect Dis. 2017;215:1657–65.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Versteeg B, Bruisten SM, Pannekoek Y, Jolley KA, Maiden MCJ, van der Ende A, et al. Genomic analyses of the Chlamydia trachomatis core genome show an association between chromosomal genome, plasmid type and disease. BMC Genomics. 2018;19:130.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Last AR, Pickering H, Roberts CH, Coll F, Phelan J, Burr SE, et al. Population-based analysis of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma-endemic West African communities identifies genomic markers of disease severity. Genome Med. 2018;10:15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Roberts CH, Last A, Molina-Gonzalez S, Cassama E, Butcher R, Nabicassa M, et al. Development and evaluation of a next-generation digital PCR diagnostic assay for ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:2195–203.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Butcher R, Houghton J, Derrick T, Ramadhani A, Herrera B, Last AR, et al. Reduced-cost Chlamydia trachomatis-specific multiplex real-time PCR diagnostic assay evaluated for ocular swabs and use by trachoma research programmes. J Microbiol Methods. 2017;139:95–102.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bolger AM, Lohse M, Usadel B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:2114–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Langmead B, Salzberg SL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods. 2012;9:357–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, et al. The sequence alignment/map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30:1312–3.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Gupta A, Jordan IK, Rishishwar L. stringMLST: a fast k-mer based tool for multilocus sequence typing. Bioinformatics. 2017;33:119–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Versteeg B, Bruisten SM, van der Ende A, Pannekoek Y. Does typing of Chlamydia trachomatis using housekeeping multilocus sequence typing reveal different sexual networks among heterosexuals and men who have sex with men? BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16:162.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hunter PR, Gaston MA. Numerical index of the discriminatory ability of typing systems: an application of Simpsonʼs index of diversity. J Clin Microbiol. 1988;26:2465–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hayes LJ, Bailey RL, Mabey DC, Clarke IN, Pickett MA, Watt PJ, et al. Genotyping of Chlamydia trachomatis from a trachoma-endemic village in the Gambia by a nested polymerase chain reaction: identification of strain variants. J Infect Dis. 1992;166:1173–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hsieh YH, Bobo LD, Quinn TC, West SK. Determinants of trachoma endemicity using Chlamydia trachomatis ompA DNA sequencing. Microbes Infect. 2001;3:447–58.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Andreasen AA, Burton MJ, Holland MJ, Polley S, Faal N, Mabey DC, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis ompA variants in trachoma: what do they tell us? PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2008;2:e306.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Conlan JW, Ferris S, Clarke IN, Ward ME. Surface-exposed epitopes on the major outer-membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis defined with peptide antisera. J Gen Microbiol. 1989;135:3219–28.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Su H, Morrison RP, Watkins NG, Caldwell HD. Identification and characterization of T helper cell epitopes of the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. J Exp Med. 1990;172:203–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ortiz L, Demick KP, Petersen JW, Polka M, Rudersdorf RA, Van der Pol B, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein (MOMP) epitopes that activate HLA class II-restricted T cells from infected humans. J Immunol. 1996;157:4554–67.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Arno JN, Xie C, Jones RB, Van Der Pol B. Identification of T cells that respond to serovar-specific regions of the Chlamydia trachomatis major outer membrane protein in persons with serovar E infection. J Infect Dis. 1998;178:1713–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zhu S, Chen J, Zheng M, Gong W, Xue X, Li W, et al. Identification of immunodominant linear B-cell epitopes within the major outer membrane protein of Chlamydia trachomatis. Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2010;42:771–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tifrea DF, Pal S, Popot JL, Cocco MJ, de la Maza LM. Increased immunoaccessibility of MOMP epitopes in a vaccine formulated with amphipols may account for the very robust protection elicited against a vaginal challenge with Chlamydia muridarum. J Immunol. 2014;192:5201–13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Jiang P, Cai Y, Chen J, Ye X, Mao S, Zhu S, et al. Evaluation of tandem Chlamydia trachomatis MOMP multi-epitopes vaccine in BALB/c mice model. Vaccine. 2017;35:3096–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lutter EI, Bonner C, Holland MJ, Suchland RJ, Stamm WE, Jewett TJ, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis Tarp and correlation with clinical phenotype. Infect Immun. 2010;78:3678–88.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Caldwell HD, Wood H, Crane D, Bailey R, Jones RB, Mabey D, et al. Polymorphisms in Chlamydia trachomatis tryptophan synthase genes differentiate between genital and ocular isolates. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1757–69.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    OʼNeill CE, Skilton RJ, Pearson SA, Filardo S, Andersson P, Clarke IN. Genetic transformation of a C. trachomatis ocular isolate with the functional tryptophan synthase operon confers an indole-rescuable phenotype. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:434.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kumar Y, Cocchiaro J, Valdivia RH. The obligate intracellular pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis targets host lipid droplets. Curr Biol. 2006;16:1646–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Saka HA, Thompson JW, Chen YS, Dubois LG, Haas JT, Moseley A, et al. Chlamydia trachomatis infection leads to defined alterations to the lipid droplet proteome in epithelial cells. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0124630.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Solomon AW, Holland MJ, Burton MJ, West SK, Alexander ND, Aguirre A, et al. Strategies for control of trachoma: observational study with quantitative PCR. Lancet. 2003;362:198–204.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Last AR, Burr SE, Weiss HA, Harding-Esch EM, Cassama E, Nabicassa M, et al. Risk factors for active trachoma and ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection in treatment-naive trachoma-hyperendemic communities of the Bijagos Archipelago, Guinea Bissau. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8:e2900.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Patino LH, Camargo M, Munoz M, Rios-Chaparro DI, Patarroyo MA, Ramirez JD. Unveiling the multilocus sequence typing (MLST) schemes and core genome phylogenies for genotyping Chlamydia trachomatis. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:1854.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Herrmann B, Isaksson J, Ryberg M, Tangrot J, Saleh I, Versteeg B, et al. Global multilocus sequence type analysis of Chlamydia trachomatis strains from 16 countries. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:2172–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Chin SA, Morberg DP, Alemayehu W, Melese M, Lakew T, Chen MC, et al. Diversity of Chlamydia trachomatis in trachoma-hyperendemic communities treated with azithromycin. Am J Epidemiol. 2018;187:1840–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Solomon AW, Mohammed Z, Massae PA, Shao JF, Foster A, Mabey DC, et al. Impact of mass distribution of azithromycin on the antibiotic susceptibilities of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005;49:4804–6.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hong KC, Schachter J, Moncada J, Zhou Z, House J, Lietman TM. Lack of macrolide resistance in Chlamydia trachomatis after mass azithromycin distributions for trachoma. Emerg Infect Dis. 2009;15:1088–90.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    West SK, Moncada J, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Storey P, Hardick J, et al. Is there evidence for resistance of ocular Chlamydia trachomatis to azithromycin after mass treatment for trachoma control? J Infect Dis. 2014;210:65–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    West ES, Munoz B, Mkocha H, Holland MJ, Aguirre A, Solomon AW, et al. Mass treatment and the effect on the load of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in a trachoma-hyperendemic community. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:83–7.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Nash SD, Stewart AEP, Zerihun M, Sata E, Gessese D, Melak B, et al. Ocular Chlamydia trachomatis infection under the surgery, antibiotics, facial cleanliness, and environmental improvement strategy in Amhara, Ethiopia, 2011–2015. Clin Infect Dis. 2018;67:1840–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Nicoloff H, Andersson DI. Indirect resistance to several classes of antibiotics in cocultures with resistant bacteria expressing antibiotic-modifying or -degrading enzymes. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016;71:100–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Abdulazeem Abdulsalam Ibrahim Alkhidir
    • 1
    Email author
  • Martin J. Holland
    • 2
  • Wafa Ibrahim Elhag
    • 3
  • Charlotte A. Williams
    • 4
  • Judith Breuer
    • 4
    • 5
  • Abdah Elfatih Elemam
    • 6
  • Khalid Mohamed Khalid El Hussain
    • 1
  • Mohammed Elfatih Hussein Ournasseir
    • 1
  • Harry Pickering
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Medical Laboratory SciencesOmdurman Islamic UniversityOmdurmanSudan
  2. 2.Clinical Research DepartmentLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical MedicineLondonUK
  3. 3.Faculty of Medical Laboratory SciencesAl-Neelain UniversityKhartoumSudan
  4. 4.Division of Infection and ImmunityUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  5. 5.Microbiology, Virology, and Infection Control, Great Ormond Street Hospital for ChildrenNHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  6. 6.Institute of Endemic DiseasesUniversity of KhartoumKhartoumSudan

Personalised recommendations