Advertisement

Trials

, 20:561 | Cite as

Leucine-enriched essential amino acid supplementation in mechanically ventilated trauma patients: a feasibility study

  • L. WandragEmail author
  • S. J. Brett
  • G. S. Frost
  • M. To
  • E. Alves Loubo
  • N. C. Jackson
  • A. M. Umpleby
  • V. Bountziouka
  • M. Hickson
Open Access
Research

Abstract

Background

Critically ill patients lose up to 2% of muscle mass per day. We assessed the feasibility of administering a leucine-enriched essential amino acid (L-EAA) supplement to mechanically ventilated trauma patients with the aim of assessing the effect on skeletal muscle mass and function.

Methods

A randomised feasibility study was performed over six months in intensive care (ICU). Patients received 5 g L-EAA five times per day in addition to standard feed (L-EAA group) or standard feed only (control group) for up to 14 days. C-reactive protein, albumin, IL-6, IL-10, urinary 3-MH, nitrogen balance, protein turnover ([1-13C] leucine infusion), muscle depth change (ultrasound), functional change (Katz and Barthel indices) and muscle strength Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score to assess ICU Acquired Weakness were measured sequentially.

Results

Eight patients (9.5% of screened patients) were recruited over six months. L-EAA doses were provided on 91/124 (73%) occasions. Inflammatory and urinary marker data were collected; serial muscle depth measurements were lacking due to short length of stay. Protein turnover studies were performed on five occasions. MRC sum score could not be performed as patients were not able to respond to the screening questions. The Katz and Barthel indices did not change. L-EAA delivery was achievable, but meaningful functional and muscle mass outcome measures require careful consideration in the design of a future randomised controlled trial.

Conclusion

L-EAA was practical to provide, but we found significant barriers to recruitment and measurement of the chosen outcomes which would need to be addressed in the design of a future, large randomised controlled trial.

Trial registration

ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN79066838. Registered on 25 July 2012.

Keywords

Muscle wasting Essential amino acids Leucine Muscle ultrasound Critically ill Nitrogen balance Protein turnover Mechanical ventilation Trauma 

Abbreviations

3-MH

3-Methylhistidine

CRP

C-reactive protein

ELISA

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

ICU

Intensive Care Unit

ICU-AW

Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness

IL-10

Interleukin 10

IL-6

Interleukin 6

L-EAA

Leucine-enriched essential amino acid

MRC

Medical Research Council

NEXIS trial

Nutrition and Exercise in Critically Illness trial

PENG

Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Group of the British Dietetic Association

RCT

Randomised controlled trial

α-KIC

Alpha-ketoisocaproic acid

Background

Critically ill patients lose up to 2% of muscle volume per day over the first 10 days [1, 2] and physical disability has been identified up to five years after Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admission in severe lung injury patients [3]. Minimising muscle wasting is crucial to optimise recovery. In elderly institutionalised patients, leucine-enriched essential amino acid (L-EAA) supplementation twice daily improved nutritional status, muscle function and physical performance [4]. Leucine supplementation increased muscle protein synthesis in elderly individuals in the short term [5, 6]. This type of supplement has not yet been studied in the critically ill, yet a recent review suggested it warranted further investigation [7].

The aims of this feasibility study were fourfold:
  1. 1.

    To determine the expected rate of recruitment for a future randomised controlled trial (RCT).

     
  2. 2.

    To establish whether a mechanically ventilated trauma population would represent a feasible patient population to study for this intervention.

     
  3. 3.

    To determine whether it was possible to routinely deliver a L-EAA supplement in ICU patients.

     
  4. 4.

    To test the feasibility of measuring muscle mass, protein turnover, strength and physical function outcomes for a future RCT.

     

Methods

This prospective randomised feasibility study was conducted at a large London teaching hospital in the adult ICU from May 2012 to December 2012.

Inclusion criteria were: age > 18 years; admission for trauma (head or multiple trauma); expected to be mechanically ventilated for > 48 h; within 72 h of ICU admission. Exclusion criteria were: non-trauma admissions; pregnant or lactating; contraindication to enteral feeding or a pre-existing condition where muscle wasting was exhibited, i.e. patients with congestive cardiac failure, neuromuscular disorders, end-stage renal failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and liver cirrhosis. Trauma patients were selected as these patients are generally younger, fitter and usually present with fewer co-morbidities than other ICU cohorts, thereby representing a more homogenous cohort. The onset of injury can also usually be identified enabling baseline representation of muscle mass and the anticipated length of stay for head or multiple trauma is often significant.

An independent research nurse performed the randomisation of patients via computer-generated schedule to either standard care (control group) or the L-EAA supplement. A branched-chain amino acid ratio for valine : leucine : isoleucine of 1 : 5 : 1 was used based on a previous study where additional leucine was shown to promote muscle protein synthesis [8]. In addition to standard enteral feeding, patients in the treatment group received a 5-g L-EAA powder dissolved in 100 mL of sterile water five times per day via the enteral feeding tube. This was continued for up to 14 days. Control patients received standard enteral feeding via ICU protocol. No placebo was used since at the time of study design the manufacturer could not supply an appropriate product. The study was not blinded as the researcher was also measuring the outcome.

Study outcome measures

The following measures of feasibility were collected: the number of patients recruited compared with those screened; compliance with administration of the L-EAA dose; and the number and reason for missed outcome measures (inflammatory markers, cytokines, nitrogen balance studies, muscle depth change, protein turnover and functional outcome measures).

Candidate outcome measures to determine rates of muscle wasting, protein turnover, strength and physical function were explored to examine their feasibility in a large RCT. These were muscle depth change on ultrasound, whole-body protein turnover using an intravenous (i.v.) infusion of 1–13C leucine, Katz and Barthel indices to assess functional change and the Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score to assess ICU-acquired weakness (ICU-AW).

C-reactive protein (CRP) (mg/L), albumin (g/L), interleukin (IL)-6 (pg/mL) and IL-10 (pg/mL) levels were measured serially on days 1, 3, 7 and 14 of the study. Cytokines were measured from plasma samples and analysed via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using ELISA grade streptavidin HRP and human IL-10 and IL-6 duosets obtained from R&D systems, Oxford, UK.

Muscle depth change (cm) was measured on alternate days throughout the ICU admission. The protocol has been described by Reid et al. [2], but, in brief, includes taking muscle measurements from the bicep, forearm and thigh and adding the measurements together to obtain a total muscle depth (cm). Ultrasound measurements were undertaken using a Sonosite M Turbo™ ultrasound machine with a 5-MHz linear array transducer (Sonosite Ltd., Hitchin, Hertfordshire, UK).

Urinary urea (mmol/24 h) and urinary 3-methylhistidine (μmol/24 h) samples were collected on study days 1, 3, 7 and 14. 3-Methylhistidine (3-MH) i was used as a surrogate marker for skeletal muscle breakdown. An amino acid analyser with cation exchange chromatography (JEOL UK Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK) was used to analyse samples with ninhydrin detection and one inferred standard. Urine urea was measured by a kinetic urease using an Abbott Architect assay with Abbott reagents (Abbott, Maidenhead, UK).

Nitrogen balance (= nitrogen in – nitrogen out) (g/day) was calculated using both the British Dietetic Association’s Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Group (PENG) recommended equation and the Deacon equation [9] (see Additional file 1).

Katz and Barthel indices were used to assess activities of daily living data. The MRC sum score was used upon awakening and at discharge from ICU as a measure of strength and to determine presence of ICU-AW as recommended by International Guidelines [10].

To measure protein turnover a primed intravenous infusion of 1–13C Leucine 1 mg/kg; 1 mg/kg/h (MassTrace, Somerville, MA, US) was administered for 3 h as previously described [11] on days 1, 3, 7 and 14. Regular blood and breath samples were taken for the measurement of the enrichment of alpha-ketoisocaproic acid (α-KIC), the concentration of leucine and the enrichment of expired CO2 at – 10 min, 0 min, 150 min (steady state), 160 min, 170 min and 180 min. Blood samples were taken from indwelling arterial catheters and breath samples were collected from the expiratory port of the ventilator (Servo 300, Siemens, Berlin, Germany or Servo I, Maquet, Sweden) via a Douglas bag with flow meter attached. Enteral feed was stopped 5 h before and during the 3 h of the protein turnover study (see Additional file 1 for protocol and laboratory analysis).

Continuous variables are shown as median (95% confidence interval) due to small sample size; categorical variables are shown as frequencies (%). Descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS V.20 (IBM Corp. 2011).

Results

From 1 May 2012 until 31 December 2012, 324 patients were admitted to intensive care. Eighty-four patients (25.9%) were major trauma admissions and 8 (9.5%) of these patients were recruited to this feasibility study. Patient recruitment is illustrated in Fig. 1.
Fig. 1

Patient recruitment for the feasibility study. CCF: congestive cardiac failure; EN: enteral nutrition; ICU: intensive Care Unit; L-EAA leucine-enriched essential amino acid, NGT nasogastric tube, NOK next-of-kin. No research staff --> no reserach staff for recruitment and enrolment; recent ICU admission- other hospital; re-admission - same hospital ICU

Demographic data are summarised in Table 1.
Table 1

Demographic data of trauma ICU patient cohort

Demographic factors

Control (n = 4)

L-EAA (n = 4)

Age (years)

60 (28–99)

53 (19–58)

Sex, n (% men)

2 (50)

4 (100)

BMI (kg/m2)

23 (20–28)

25 (21–28)

APACHE II (0–71) a

14 (13–20)

15 (11–22)

Injury Severity Score (0–75) b

27 (13–34)

42 (20–50)

Diagnosis, n (%)

 Multiple trauma (no TBI)

1 (12.5)

1 (12.5)

 TBI only

1 (12.5)

1 (12.5)

 Trauma including TBI

2 (25)

2 (25)

ICU LOS (days)

5 (2–6)

10 (8–14)

Hospital LOS (days)

15 (4–29)

14 (8–30)

L-EAA leucine-enriched essential amino acid, IQR interquartile range, BMI body mass index, APACHE II Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II, TBI traumatic brain injury, ICU Intensive Care Unit, LOS length of stay

Continuous variables shown as median (95% confidence intervals); categorical variables shown as frequencies (%)

aHigher APACHE I scores indicate greater disease severity and correspond with risk of death

bInjury Severity Score > 15 is defined as major trauma

The feasibility of data collection is described in Table 2. Muscle ultrasound and protein turnover data collection were much lower than anticipated because patients were transferred back to referring hospitals earlier than anticipated. The Katz and Barthel indices remained at zero for all patients throughout the study and are considered inappropriate for future use in ICU populations. Manual strength testing could not be performed as patients were not able to respond appropriately to the screening questions.
Table 2

Feasibility of outcome measures, planned versus achieved measurements

Outcome measure

Target (%)

Achieved (%)

Comment

Control (n = 4)

Results as range

L-EAA (n = 4)

Results as range

Patients recruited

> 30

9.5% patients recruited

Lower than anticipated

L-EAA supplement

> 70

73% doses given

Unable to give due to GI intolerance

Inflammatory markers and cytokines

> 90

100% samples taken

All required samples were taken

CRP (mg/L)

2–312

42.7–262

Serum albumin (g/L)

22–30

29–39

IL-6 (pg/mL)

11.4–141

9–78.5

IL-10 (pg/mL)

0–137

0–2100

Urine samples (u-urea, 3-MH)

>  80

81% samples taken

CRRT expected in some patients hence > 80% planned

No misplaced samples

Urinary urea (mmol/24 h)

55–269

51–382

3-MH (μmol/24 h)

174–616

144–660

Muscle depth via ultrasound (sum of three sites, planned measurement on alternate days)

>  90

50% measurements completed

Shorter LOS than anticipated

Fewer measurements recommended, i.e. days 1, 7, 10

Muscle depth (cm)

5.34–12.36

4.43–11.93

Protein turnover study

>  80

31% studies completed

Complex, time-consuming

Required 3 staff members for Douglas bag breath collection method and blood sampling. Simpler technique required, whole body vs muscle protein turnover

Protein turnover (g/24 h)

0

−3.9 to −1.73

Nitrogen balance (PENG, g/day)

> 80

81% calculated

CRRT affecting urine sampling, urinary urea

− 10.6 to 7.4

− 7.95 to 11

Nitrogen balance (Deacon, g/day)

> 80

81% calculated

CRRT affecting urine sampling, urinary urea

− 6.2 to 7.4

− 3.3 to 11.2

Katz and Barthel indices

> 90

100% tested

Poor tests in this setting with substantial floor effect

0

0

MRC sum score

> 90

0% completed

No patient passed initial MRC screening questions (8/10 presented with traumatic brain injury)

CRP C-reactive protein, IL-6 interleukin 6, IL-10 interleukin 10, L-EAA leucine-enriched essential amino acid, GI gastrointestinal, CRRT chronic renal replacement therapy, 3-MH 3-methylhistidine, LOS length of stay, MRC Medical Research Council, RFCSA rectus femoris cross-sectional area

Discussion

This study was designed to investigate the feasibility of undertaking a RCT providing a L-EAA supplement to critically ill trauma patients to determine the effect on muscle wasting and protein turnover. We found significant barriers to recruitment and to measurement of the chosen outcomes which would need to be addressed in the design of a future, large RCT. Recruitment was dependent on one researcher without 24 h availability. We also found the measurement of some outcomes and frequency thereof to be very intensive for each patient.

Specific recommendations for a future study include the following:

In terms of recruitment, a multicentre design should be considered, potentially as part of a trial group that enables enrolment in multiple sites nationally and/or internationally. The design of a future protocol should allow co-enrolment with other studies, where feasible. We would advise having multiple trained members of staff available to recruit over 24 h, for seven days per week.

In terms of the population studied, the trauma population had some theoretical advantages, fewer co-morbidities, potentially fewer confounders and known onset of injury. However, the dynamic nature of this cohort was underestimated; they had multiple procedures, interventions, admissions to theatre and unexpected repatriation. This made data collection difficult for an intensive physiological study such as this. We would recommend not restricting recruitment to a specific type of ICU patient but including those who are expected to be ventilated for > 48 h and perhaps those patients with high nutritional risk.

Provision of a L-EAA supplement is possible in an ICU setting; however, minimising the number of doses from five times a day to twice daily may aid delivery without reducing any potential beneficial effect. Type and dose of amino acid supplement as well as the best phase of critical illness (acute, chronic, recovery phase) in which to provide this [12] still needs to be explored thoroughly in future studies. Protein supplementation in conjunction with physical activity or exercise may have the best synergistic effect [13]. The current NEXIS (Nutrition and Exercise in Critical Illness) Trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03021902, in which intravenous amino acids is given alongside in-bed cycle ergometry, will aid to explore this synergistic effect.

In terms of outcome measures, we would suggest that a larger research team is required for such complex outcome measures as stable isotope measurement in ventilated patients. However, the number of staff performing muscle ultrasound measurements should be minimised due to the challenges of achieving good inter-rater reliability. Serial muscle ultrasound measurement over fewer data collection points, i.e. days 1 and 7, may be more sensible. A longer follow-up period would be required in a future amino acid dosing study to assess the post-ICU phase. Patients should be followed up into the ward and after the hospital admission so that longer-term functional outcome measures could be assessed. A mixture of nutritional, physical and functional outcome measures should be included in this type of study. Inflammatory markers and cytokine data were feasible to collect on most occasions. Urinary measurements were only missed due to renal replacement therapy. Serial muscle ultrasound measurement over fewer data collection points, i.e. days 1 and 7, may be more sensible.

The Katz and Barthel indices demonstrated substantial floor effects and were thus poor informers of functional change in critically ill patients. MRC sum score assessment is not advised in a majority head-injured trauma population. Functional assessment tools require piloting in future studies.

To our knowledge, this was the first study to assess the feasibility of using a L-EAA supplement in mechanically ventilated trauma patients. Outcome measures to assess protein turnover, muscle depth change and markers of protein breakdown in conjunction with functional outcome measures are not usually embedded into nutrition trials in the ICU. As such, this study should assist future investigators in considering which ICU patient population and outcome measures to study.

Conclusion

Amino acid supplementation is feasible in ventilated critically ill patients; however, this study had some major design limitations. Researchers need to consider the study population carefully, perhaps considering individual phenotypes and including patients with high nutritional risk, as well as the detailed clinical pathway. The intervention needs careful consideration for type, dose and timing in terms of phase of illness. Studying interventions both in the ICU and post-ICU phase may be most informative, while coupling amino acids with physical activity. Muscle mass, functional and quality of life outcome measures should be included in future studies.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge support from the ICU research team at Kings College Hospital, London for assistance with screening of patients and for assistance with performing stable isotope studies in ventilated trauma patients, in particular Dr Phil Hopkins, Dr Stephanie Strachan and Dr Andre Vercueil.

Authors’ contributions

LW, SJB, GSF and MH acquired funding and designed this study. LW performed data acquisition and analysis. VB assisted with statistical plan and data analysis. MT and EAL assisted with data acquisition, laboratory analysis of ELISA and interpretation of data. NCJ and AMU supervised stable isotope laboratory work and advised on protein turnover data. All authors were involved with final interpretation of data and have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

Liesl Wandrag was funded by a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Clinical Doctoral Research Fellowship for this research project. This publication presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). The research was further supported by the NIHR Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Imperial College London. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency confirmed this was not a trial of an investigative medicinal product and ethical approval was granted by the Camden & Islington Research Ethics Committee (10/H0722/40), trial registration: ISRCTN79066838. In line with the Mental Capacity Act 2005 for persons who lack capacity, agreement was sought from a personal or professional consultee. Retrospective consent was gained once a patient regained capacity.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

13063_2019_3639_MOESM1_ESM.docx (44 kb)
Additional file 1: Supplementary material [14]. (DOCX 44 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Puthucheary ZA, McPhail MJ, Hart N. Acute muscle wasting among critically ill patients--reply. JAMA. 2014;311(6):622–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reid CL, Campbell IT, Little RA. Muscle wasting and energy balance in critical illness. Clin Nutr. 2004;23(2):273–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Herridge MS. The challenge of designing a post-critical illness rehabilitation intervention. Crit Care. 2011;15(5):1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rondanelli M, Opizzi A, Antoniello N, Boschi F, Iadarola P, Pasini E, et al. Effect of essential amino acid supplementation on quality of life, amino acid profile and strength in institutionalized elderly patients. Clin Nutr. 2011;30(5):571–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anthony JC, Anthony TG, Kimball SR, Jefferson LS. Signaling pathways involved in translational control of protein synthesis in skeletal muscle by leucine. J Nutr. 2001;131(3):856S–60S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Katsanos CS, Kobayashi H, Sheffield-Moore M, Aarsland A, Wolfe RR. Aging is associated with diminished accretion of muscle proteins after the ingestion of a small bolus of essential amino acids. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;82(5):1065–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wandrag L, Brett SJ, Frost G, Hickson M. Impact of supplementation with amino acids or their metabolites on muscle wasting in patients with critical illness or other muscle wasting illness: a systematic review. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2015;28(4):313–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Borsheim E, Bui QU, Tissier S, Kobayashi H, Ferrando AA, Wolfe RR. Effect of amino acid supplementation on muscle mass, strength and physical function in elderly. Clin Nutr. 2008;27(2):189–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Deacon A, Sherwood RA, Hooper J, Association for Clinical Biochemistry (Great Britain). Calculations in laboratory science. London: ACB Venture Publications; 2009.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stevens RD, Dowdy DW, Michaels RK, Mendez-Tellez PA, Pronovost PJ, Needham DM. Neuromuscular dysfunction acquired in critical illness: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. 2007;33(11):1876–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Carroll PV, Jackson NC, Russell-Jones DL, Treacher DF, Sonksen PH, Umpleby AM. Combined growth hormone/insulin-like growth factor I in addition to glutamine-supplemented TPN results in net protein anabolism in critical illness. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2004;286(1):E151–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wischmeyer PE, Puthucheary Z, San Milla I, Butze D, Grocott MPW. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2017;23:269–78.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCC.0000000000000431.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Breen L, Phillips SM. Nutrient interaction for optimal protein anabolism in resistance exercise. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2012;15(3):226–32.  https://doi.org/10.1097/MCO.0b013e3283516850.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bear DE, Wandrag L, Merriweather JL, Connolly B, Hart N, Grocott MPW. Enhanced Recovery After Critical Illness Programme Group (ERACIP) investigators. The role of nutritional support in the physical and functional recovery of critically ill patients: a narrative review. Crit Care. 2017;21(1):226.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-017-1810-2 Review.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Nutrition and Dietetic Research Group, Department of Investigative MedicineImperial College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Nutrition & DieteticsGuy’s & St Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  3. 3.Centre for Peri-operative Medicine and Critical Care ResearchImperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondonUK
  4. 4.Department of Nutritional ScienceUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUK
  5. 5.Statistical Support Service, Population, Policy and Practice Programme, Institute of Child HealthUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  6. 6.Institute of Health and CommunityUniversity of PlymouthPlymouthUK

Personalised recommendations