Advertisement

Trials

, 20:132 | Cite as

Pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with mustard gas lung disease: a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

  • Mohamad Reza Sedighi Moghadam
  • Mostafa GhaneiEmail author
  • Klaus Kenn
  • Nicholas S. Hopkinson
Open Access
Study protocol

Abstract

Background

More than 60,000 people have health problems due to chemical weapons exposure during the Iran–Iraq war. Respiratory consequences of mustard gas exposure are common and disabling; medical interventions have limited effect. Patients complain of cough, sputum, breathlessness and exercise limitation. We hypothesized that patients with this condition would benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation.

Methods

We outline the protocol for an assessor-blind, two-armed, parallel-design randomized controlled clinical trial (IRCT2016051127848N1). Sixty patients with respiratory disease due to documented sulfur mustard gas exposure will be randomized to either take part in a 6-week pulmonary rehabilitation programme or receive usual care. Inclusion criteria include forced expiratory volume in 1 second < 80% predicted and Medical Research Council dyspnoea score ≥ 3. The primary endpoint will be the change in cycle endurance time at 70% baseline exercise capacity at 6 weeks. Lung function, physical activity, the strength and endurance of the quadriceps muscle, and quality of life will also be compared. Outcomes will be assessed at 6 weeks and 12 months. Health care utilization will also be assessed.

Discussion

If the study confirms that rehabilitation is effective for patients with mustard gas lung disease this should prompt provision of the intervention to this patient group.

Trial registration

Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT2016051127848N1. Registered on 24 May 2016.

Keywords

Pulmonary rehabilitation Chemical warfare Mustard gas Randomized controlled trial 

Abbreviations

6MWT

Six-minute walk test

BIA

Bioelectrical impedance analyser

BMI

Body mass index

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

CRF

Case Report Form

CRP

C-reactive protein

DLco

Diffusing capacity/transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide

EAC

Endpoint Adjudication Committee

FEV1

Forced expiratory volume in 1 second

FFM

Fat-free mass

GH

Growth hormone

HADS

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale

IET

Incremental exercise test

IGF-1

Insulin-like growth factor 1

MRC

Medical Research Council

PR

Pulmonary rehabilitation

QOL

Quality of life

RFCSA

Rectus femoris cross-sectional area

SGRQ

St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire

SpO2

Saturation of peripheral oxygen

Wmax

Maximum workload

Background

There are more than 60,000 victims of chemical weapons used against Iranian combatants and civilians during the Iran–Iraq war in the 1980s [1]. Mustard gas has well-described respiratory complications, including tracheal stenosis, tracheomalacia, bronchiectasis and constrictive bronchiolitis [2, 3, 4]. Patients experience cough, sputum and breathlessness associated with limitation of their exercise capacity and difficulties with day-to-day activities. Fatigue, anxiety and depression are also common [5, 6]. Clinical symptoms and quality of life are in some studies only poorly correlated with pulmonary function [7]. The clinical picture is thus similar to that observed in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [8].

Exercise capacity and breathlessness in lung disease can be influenced by a combination of cardiorespiratory impairment, skeletal muscle dysfunction and changes to the threshold at which symptoms are tolerated [9, 10]. Breathlessness, like pain, can be modified by past experience and expectations, and there is evidence of central adaptations in people with lung disease [10, 11]. A vicious cycle of breathlessness, immobility and deconditioning can worsen the patients’ condition and make them more susceptible to the development of physical inactivity-related multimorbidity including hypertension, diabetes and osteoporosis. Most of the people exposed to mustard gas in the 1980s are now in their 50s or older [1]. A sustainable health system needs to prevent the development of future health problems—physical activity interventions have a key role in this [12].

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a holistic approach for people limited by lung disease, defined as ‘a comprehensive intervention based on a thorough patient assessment followed by patient-tailored therapies that include, but are not limited to, exercise training, education on your lung disease or condition and how to manage it, and behaviour change, designed to improve the physical and psychological condition of people with chronic respiratory disease and to promote the long-term adherence to health-enhancing behaviours’ [13]. There is an extensive evidence base for PR in COPD patients [14] and a growing body of research in other lung diseases [13]. PR can improve muscle strength, exercise capacity, health status and symptoms of anxiety and depression as well as reducing hospital readmission rates [13]. It has been shown to alter breathlessness perception [10] and also boosts COPD patients’ understanding of their condition and ability to self-manage.

Skeletal muscle impairment is a common feature of COPD and other lung diseases such as pulmonary fibrosis [15]. It can occur early in COPD; weakness is present in about 30% of patients and is associated with reduced levels of physical activity [16]. It directly influences exercise performance [17], is associated with poor health status [18] and is an independent predictor of health care utilization [19] and mortality [20]. Musculoskeletal disorders are also highly prevalent in COPD [21].

A marked increase in susceptibility to fatigue is also observed in COPD, with a more rapid decline in performance during continuous or repeated bouts of exercise [22] or with non-volitional testing [23]. This is associated with a fibre type shift [24], reduced oxidative capacity [23, 24] and increased skeletal muscle adiposity [25]. This fibre type shift is itself independently associated with increased mortality risk [26].

Although the disease shares many clinical features with COPD, few data exist on skeletal muscle parameters in patients with mustard gas lung disease. It is likely that similar processes are in place. In spite of inhaled and other therapies, the clinical condition of chemical warfare victims is progressing with time and as they age [3]. We hypothesize that, as is the case in COPD patients, pulmonary rehabilitation will improve the health of this patient group. To address this, we will conduct a randomized controlled trial to address the following key questions: does PR improve exercise capacity; does PR improve health status; does PR influence daily physical activity levels; does PR increase quadriceps strength; does PR increase quadriceps cross-sectional area; and does PR reduce health resource utilization?. In order to improve the completeness of trial protocols, we used SPIRIT 2013 Checklist (Additional file 1).

Methods

Study design

We have designed an assessor-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial comparing PR with usual care to assess the effect of this intervention in mustard lung patients (Fig 1).
Fig. 1

Flow diagram of recruitment, intervention, follow-ups and assessment. Procedure of the study evaluating the impact of the pulmonary rehabilitation programme. 6MWT six-minute walk test, FFM fat-free mass, RF csa rectus femoris cross-sectional area, PFTs pulmonary function tests, QMVC quadriceps maximal voluntary contraction

Study setting

The pulmonary rehabilitation, trial activities and other clinical services will be delivered in Tehran’s Khatam-ol-Anbia Hospital. This hospital is a sub-specialized centre equipped with specialized personnel and advanced equipment including a cardiopulmonary rehabilitation hall. It is located in the city centre which makes it easier to access. Moreover, one of the missions of this hospital is to deliver specialized and sub-specialized services to war veterans [27].

Participants

The participants are chemical warfare victims with contemporaneously documented exposure to mustard gas, residing in Tehran and its suburbs, who have symptomatic lung disease. Inclusion criteria include FEV1 < 80% and MRC dyspnoea score ≥ 3 [28].

Exclusion criteria are: any type of debilitating clinical condition that prevents the patient from participating in the rehabilitation programme, such as arthritis; any type of clinical condition that will endanger the patient during the physical exercises, such as uncontrolled cardiac diseases; the presence of other non-chemical-related pulmonary diseases, like asthma; active malignancy; and severe cognitive disorder and psychiatric disease that is associated with memory disorder.

Interventions

Intervention group

In addition to the usual treatment, the intervention group will receive pulmonary rehabilitation services. The pulmonary rehabilitation intervention will include a combination of physical exercises, an educational programme and psychosocial support. The physical exercises will include endurance and strength components, tailored to each individual’s condition and characteristics, prescribed according to the following protocol. Both the upper and lower limbs will be exercised, although with greater emphasis on the legs. For more details of the intervention protocol, please see Additional file 2.

Usual care

The control group will continue on their usual medication with management determined by their clinical team. They will receive standard advice about the importance of physical activity and be encouraged to exercise regularly. The participants in both groups will visit 12 times, at 1-month intervals (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Steps taken at each visit. *Demographics and past medical history. **Dyspnoea scale, fatigue scale, body plethysmography parameters, diffusing capacity/transfer factor of the lung for carbon monoxide parameters, rectus femoris cross-sectional area, incremental cycle exercise test parameters, constant work rate cycle endurance test parameters, isokinetic quadriceps muscle function test parameters, body composition parameters, six-minute walk test parameters, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale parameters, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire parameters, blood test parameters and daily physical activity parameters. ***Number of exacerbations of the disease, hospitalizations and medications

Outcomes

Outcome assessment

Before starting the outcome assessment, assessors will be trained in and familiar with the assessment protocol and instruments. They will be blind to the study participants’ group allocations. Outcomes will be measured at baseline prior to the intervention, after 6 weeks and after 12 months from study entry.

Primary outcome

The primary outcome of the study will be the cycle endurance time at 70% of baseline workload, measured at the end of 6 weeks. An increase of > 105 s in the endurance time has been defined as the minimum clinically important difference and will be used as a threshold for responder analysis [29].

A symptom-limited incremental exercise test (IET) will be used to determine the Wmax of each participant at baseline. After 3 min of acclimatization and 1 min of unloaded cycling, the workload is increased by 10 W/min until the patient can no longer bear heavier loads. The highest workload that each individual can complete during 60 s of pedalling will be defined as the Wmax [30]. A practice constant work rate test will be performed approximately 1 h after the IET at 70% maximum workload. Three minutes of unloaded cycling (0 W) will be given to allow for respiratory adaptation and warm up [31]. At the next session, a few days later, the constant workload test will be repeated and the outcome of this taken as the baseline measure of the endurance time [30].

Secondary outcomes/clinical and behavioural

Pulmonary function

Spirometry, body plethysmography and gas transfer (DLco) will be measured in accordance with international guidelines [31, 32, 33].

Quadriceps strength and endurance

Participants will perform 30 repetitions of a maximum voluntary contraction with an angular velocity of 90° per second using the Isokinetic Test Rehabilitation System (MPS21) in an upright sitting position, with an angle of 90° at the thigh joint [34]. Strength is assessed as the quadriceps muscle peak torque (in Newton-meters). The endurance of the quadriceps muscle is defined as the total work done (Joules) during 30 consecutive muscular contraction repeats [35]. To reduce the effects of learning at the baseline assessment, the test will be performed twice and the best value used.

Quadriceps muscle bulk

The rectus femoris cross-sectional area (RFCSA) will be measured with B-mode ultrasonography using an 8-MHz, 5.6-cm linear probe, similar to de Bruin et al.’s method [36]. The probe will be placed perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the thigh in the superior segment, three-fifths of the distance from the anterior superior iliac spine to the superior patellar border. The highest point of the thigh from the RFCSA can be viewed in one field in all individuals. The other quadriceps muscles cannot be investigated by this method. Imaging will be done when the leg is at rest and in a condition wherein the individual is lying supine. Oblique imaging will be minimized by the operator to achieve the smallest cross-sectional image. The depth of the scan is set to where the femur alignment can be recognized. The contraction–relaxation manoeuvre will be used to delineate the muscle septa before the image is taken. Once the inner echogenic line of the rectus femoris is delineated by a movable cursor on a frozen image, the RFCSA will be calculated using a planimetric technique [16, 37]. This outcome will be assessed three times, at baseline, the 6th week and the 12th month.

Six-minute walk distance

The 6MWT is done in accordance with ATS guidelines [38], including a practice walk. The better test will be considered the patient’s baseline assessment. The patients will not do warm-ups before the test and will rest for at least 10 min before the test is begun. Any contraindications to the test will be sought. The blood pressure, heart rate and SpO2, as well as dyspnoea and leg fatigue with the Borg scale, will be recorded. Patients will receive standard instructions on going the greatest distance during 6 min. They will be monitored throughout the test for SpO2. If a pause is required due to dyspnoea or fatigue, the patient will be allowed to rest. However, the chronometer will not be stopped and the numbers and durations of stops will be noted.

At the end of the 6 min, in addition to registering the distance walked, the SpO2 and heart rate will be measured, and the level of dyspnoea and leg fatigue will be measured with the Borg scale.

Daily physical activity

Daily physical activity will be measured with an accelerometer (triaxial pedometer PD724; Tanita, Tokyo, Japan). The patient will use the pedometer according to instructions for a week at three stages: a week before they start the programme at baseline, the 6th week and the 12th month. Participants will be asked to bring the pedometer after a week. The Tanita PD724 pedometer displays a cumulative step count for each day and also retains the step counts from the preceding 7 days in its memory, allowing the average step count for the preceding week to be evaluated [39]. The first and last days of handing over the pedometer will not be included in the estimations due to the possibility of bias.

Quality of life

St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a standard self-administered questionnaire that has been specifically designed to assess QOL in patients with chronic respiratory diseases [40]. The Persian version has also been standardized and domesticized, and can be used to evaluate QOL in patients with chronic pulmonary diseases [41]. This tool consists of three sections: symptom, activity and impact. In the first section, the symptoms are assessed, and items such as the frequency of cough, sputum production, wheeze, breathlessness and duration and frequency of attacks of breathlessness or wheeze are evaluated. Activity and impact are examined in the next sections and include the activities that bring about breathlessness, or the activities that are limited due to breathlessness. Moreover, the impact of respiratory problems on life and activities such as employment, daily life disorders and so forth are evaluated [41].

Anxiety and depression

The HADS questionnaire is a well-known tool to screen for anxiety and depression, and can detect the impact of therapeutic interventions. Studies conducted on the validity of this questionnaire in detecting the symptoms and causes of anxiety and depression and assessing their severity have indicated its high accuracy and high validity. The Persian version has also been standardized and domesticized, and can be used [42]. This tool contains seven questions for assessing anxiety and seven questions for assessing depression, scored from 0 to 3. Thus, each individual can gain 0–21 for anxiety or depression [43]. Based on the results of a systematic review on a number of studies employing this tool, the cut-off point for anxiety or depression is 8/21 [44].

Body composition

The participants will be asked to stand barefoot while their height is measured to the nearest 0.5 cm. A single-frequency bioelectrical impedance analyser (BIA) will be used to assess body composition. Height (cm), weight (kg), FFM (kg) and BMI (kg/m2) will be measured at baseline, the 6th week and the 12th month.

Blood tests

Testosterone, high-sensitivity CRP, IGF-1 and GH will be measured as factors that may be associated with reduced muscle mass. These tests will be measured at baseline, the 6th week and the 12th month.

Number of disease exacerbations and hospitalizations

To measure this outcome, the number of exacerbations of disease and cases of hospitalizations due to pulmonary disease during the past year will be asked. An exacerbation is defined as ‘an increase in respiratory signs and symptoms leading to change in type and/or rate of medicine intake’. This outcome will be assessed based on recall and clinical records at baseline, the 6th week and the 12th month. Heath resource utilization will be assessed from a health service perspective. Data will be captured from central clinical records and include hospital visits, medication and medical procedures performed. These will be related to standard costs to allow for an estimate of the health economic impact of the intervention to be assessed.

Randomization

After selecting the participants according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, baseline assessments will be performed. The participants will then be randomized into control or intervention groups. A random sequence will be determined from the randomization website (http://www.jerrydallal.com/random/permute.htm) in blocks of four. Randomization will be performed by a technician who is blind to the title of each group. In order to protect confidentiality in all stages of the trial, each participant will be assigned a unique identification code.

Recruitment and consent

Chemical warfare victims residing in Tehran and its suburbs will be identified from the administrative database for this condition. Those with a history of exposure to mustard gas will be invited to participate in the study. The patients will undergo specialized examinations and baseline assessments. Patients with the inclusion criteria will read the informed consent form (Additional file 3), previously provided by study supervisor, and receive further explanation in the case of any confusion regarding the contents. If the patient needs more time to think or to consult their family members they will be given a week to decide.

During the study, the patient will be excluded from the study if any of the following occurs: any of the exclusion criteria emerge in the patient; the patient is affected with any disease or medical condition that will make it difficult for them to continue participating in the study; the patient wishes to withdraw from the study for personal reasons; emigration; or death. Compliance with PR is defined as missing fewer than four sessions and a per-protocol analysis as well as intention to treat will be carried out. During the trial, patients can receive their care but they will not be allowed to undergo any interventional study.

Follow-up

The participants of both groups will be visited 12 times, at 1-month intervals (Fig. 1). At the ‘zero visit’, all individuals who are most likely eligible (based on their medical records) to enrol in the study will be invited. The participants will then be carefully examined by specialists and assessed for presenting the inclusion or exclusion criteria.

Data management

Patient data will be collected from their medical records, questionnaires completed by the questioner, test reports, documented physician comments, researchers’ observations and patient interview. A technician will enter the data from the ‘Case Report Form’ (CRF) into SPSS statistical software. To ensure the accuracy of data entry, double data entry will take place at every stage of data gathering.

The Coordinating Team, Steering Committee, Endpoint Adjudication Committee, Data Management Team and Data Monitoring Committee are responsible for the implementation, control and monitoring of the correct implementation of the study.

Sample size and statistical analysis

Assuming a 105-s improvement in the time limit in the treatment arm and a 20-s improvement in controls with an SD of 100, 90% power and a significance level of 5% requires 60 patients to complete the study.

The data will be cleaned and assessed for outliers and missing variables. Outcomes will be compared using ANOVA adjusted for baseline parameters. The data will be analysed by t test, chi-square test and, if required, non-parametric tests and with Excel 2010 and SPSS Statistics 20 software at a level of significance of 0.05.

Discussion

This study using a controlled randomized clinical trial will investigate the impact of a PR programme on people with mustard gas lung disease. If the programme proves efficacious, pulmonary rehabilitation centres can be established and expanded across the country/countries that have been victims of chemical attacks.

Among the limitations of this study are the following: participation in the rehabilitation centre exercises for 6 weeks, three times a week might be difficult for those participants who are employed; and the length of the project (being 1 year long) raises the risk of participant drop-out.

Some of the strengths of this study are as follows: this is the first PR protocol that is being conducted for sulfur mustard victims; the emphasis on the use of objective and safe methods in assessing patients, instead of subjective methods, is an additional strength of this study; and the results of this study can be used in other regions that have also been victims of mustard gas exposure.

Trial status

The enrolment of the first participant to the trial was performed on 22 November 2017 and the enrolment was completed in August 2018. The participants were randomized and allocated and last patient last visit will be in August 2019.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study is supported by the Technical Secretariat of the OPCW; Imperial College, London; Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener Land- Germany; Khatam-ol-Anbia Hospital Tehran- Iran; Sasan Hospital Tehran- Iran.

Funding

This study is being financially supported by the Janbazan Medical and Engineering Research Centre (JMERC) and Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs (FMVA). The role of the sponsor and funders is limited to financial support of all stages of the implementation of the plan and use of its results. In addition, they try to achieve enough participant enrolment to reach target sample size through the establishment of facilities for patients to have access to the rehabilitation centre. JMERC Tel: + 98 21 22418097; FMVA Tel: + 98 21 883132118.

Availability of data and materials

The Authors and the funders will have access to final dataset.

Authors’ contributions

MG and NSH conceived the study. MG and MRSM designed and composed the content of the study. MRSM conducts the implementation procedures and manages the project. KK and NSH contributed to the study design and procedures. NSH contributed to the intervention content. MG and MRSM conduct the recruitment and evaluation. MRSM and NSH prepared the first manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The exercises will be in a specialized hospital, where the exercise hall is equipped with emergency equipment. There will be a doctor on hand at all times and in case of any adverse effects or other unwanted events due to interventions or assessments, s/he will report to EAC.

All participants will be asked to sign a written informed consent form. Any probable damage will be covered by the research team. The participants may leave the study at any time, and this decision will not affect or limit the reception of future medical care.

The proposal of the study has been approved by the Organizational Committee of Ethics in Biomedical Research Foundation of Martyrs and Veterans Affairs under approval number 87-E-R-102.

Consent for publication

The manuscript contains no individual person’s data in any form and it is just a protocol study. “Not applicable”.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

13063_2019_3180_MOESM1_ESM.docx (52 kb)
Additional file 1: SPIRIT 2013 Checklist: Recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents (DOCX 51 kb)
13063_2019_3180_MOESM2_ESM.docx (31 kb)
Additional file 2: Intervention protocol. (DOCX 31 kb)
13063_2019_3180_MOESM3_ESM.docx (23 kb)
Additional file 3: Participation in the Pulmonary Rehabilitation Project (Persian version). (DOCX 23 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Taebi G, Soroush M, Modirian E, Khateri S, Mousavi B, Ganjparvar Z. Epidemiological study of human costs resulting from Iraq’s chemical warfare against Iran. Iran J War Public Health. 2015;7:115–21.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Emad A, Rezaian GR. The diversity of the effects of sulfur mustard gas inhalation on respiratory system 10 years after a single, heavy exposure: analysis of 197 cases. Chest. 1997;112:738–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghanei M, Amini Harandi A. Long term consequences from exposure to sulfur mustard: a review. Inhal Toxicol. 2007;19:451–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Khateri S, Ghanei M, Keshavarz S, Soroush M, Haines D. Incidence of lung, eye, and skin lesions as late complications in 34,000 Iranians with wartime exposure to mustard agent. J Occup Environ Med. 2003;45:1136–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Abbasi S, Mehdizadeh S, Moqaddam M. The relationship between fatigue and mental health in chemical warfare victims with bronchiolitis obliterans. J Urmia Nurs Midwifery Fac. 2013;11:0.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Karami G-R, Ameli J, Roeintan R, Jonaidi-Jafari N, Saburi A. Impacts of mustard gas exposure on veterans mental health: a study on the role of education. Ind Psychiatry J. 2013;22:22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ataran D, Khajeh DM, Mazloumi S, Jafar ZR: Health-related quality of life in patients with chemical warfare-induced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Iran Med. 2006;9(4):359–63.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jones PW. Health status measurement in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2001;56:880–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hopkinson NS, Baxter N. Breathing SPACE—a practical approach to the breathless patient. NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2017;27:5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herigstad M, Faull OK, Hayen A, Evans E, Hardinge FM, Wiech K, Pattinson KT. Treating breathlessness via the brain: changes in brain activity over a course of pulmonary rehabilitation. Eur Respir J. 2017;50:1701029.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hopkinson NS, Polkey MI, Sharshar T. Motor cortex activation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186:1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Aitsi-Selmi A, Hopkinson NS. Breathlessness, physical activity and sustainability of healthcare. Eur Respir J. 2015;45:284–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Spruit MA, Singh SJ, Garvey C, ZuWallack R, Nici L, Rochester C, Hill K, Holland AE, Lareau SC, Man WD-C. An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: key concepts and advances in pulmonary rehabilitation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188:e13–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    McCarthy B, Casey D, Devane D, Murphy K, Murphy E, Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2:CD003793Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mendoza L, Gogali A, Shrikrishna D, Cavada G, Kemp SV, Natanek SA, Jackson AS, Polkey MI, Wells AU, Hopkinson NS. Quadriceps strength and endurance in fibrotic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia. Respirology. 2014;19:138–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Shrikrishna D, Patel M, Tanner RJ, Seymour JM, Connolly BA, Puthucheary ZA, Walsh SL, Bloch SA, Sidhu PS, Hart N, et al. Quadriceps wasting and physical inactivity in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2012;40:1115–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gosselink R, Troosters T, Decramer M. Peripheral muscle weakness contributes to exercise limitation in COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1996;153:976–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shrikrishna D, Hopkinson NS. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: consequences beyond the lung. Clin Med. 2012;12:71–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decramer M, Gosselink R, Troosters T, Verschueren M, Evers G. Muscle weakness is related to utilization of health care resources in COPD patients. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:417–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Swallow EB, Reyes D, Hopkinson NS, Man WD, Porcher R, Cetti EJ, Moore AJ, Moxham J, Polkey MI. Quadriceps strength predicts mortality in patients with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2007;62:115–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, Watt G, Wyke S, Guthrie B. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380:37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Coronell C, Orozco-Levi M, Mendez R, Ramírez-Sarmiento A, Galdiz J, Gea J. Relevance of assessing quadriceps endurance in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004;24:129–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Swallow EB, Gosker HR, Ward KA, Moore AJ, Dayer MJ, Hopkinson NS, Schols AM, Moxham J, Polkey MI. A novel technique for nonvolitional assessment of quadriceps muscle endurance in humans. J Appl Physiol. 2007;103:739–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Natanek SA, Gosker HR, Slot IGM, Marsh GS, Hopkinson NS, Man WDC, Tal-Singer R, Moxham J, Kemp PR, Schols AMWJ, Polkey MI. Heterogeneity of quadriceps muscle phenotype in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD); implications for stratified medicine? Muscle Nerve. 2013;48:488–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Maddocks M, Shrikrishna D, Vitoriano S, Natanek SA, Tanner RJ, Hart N, Kemp PR, Moxham J, Polkey MI, Hopkinson NS. Skeletal muscle adiposity is associated with physical activity, exercise capacity and fibre shift in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2014;44:1188–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patel MS, Natanek SA, Stratakos G, Pascual S, Martínez-Llorens J, Disano L, Terzis G, Hopkinson NS, Gea J, Vogiatzis I, et al. Vastus lateralis fiber shift is an independent predictor of mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;190:350–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Khatam-Ol-Anbia Specialty and Subspecialty Hospital. [www.khatamhospital.org/en/].
  28. 28.
    Fletcher CM, Elmes PC, Fairbairn AS, Wood CH. Significance of respiratory symptoms and the diagnosis of chronic bronchitis in a working population. Br Med J. 1959;2:257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jones PW, Beeh KM, Chapman KR, Decramer M, Mahler DA, Wedzicha JA. Minimal clinically important differences in pharmacological trials. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014;189:250–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mador MJ, Bozkanat E, Aggarwal A, Shaffer M, Kufel TJ. Endurance and strength training in patients with COPD. Chest J. 2004;125:2036–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Society AT. ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;167:211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright PV, Van Der Grinten C, Gustafsson P. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26:319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Graham BL, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Cooper BG, Jensen R, Kendrick A, MacIntyre NR, Thompson BR, Wanger J. 2017 ERS/ATS standards for single-breath carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J. 2017;49:1600016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Mathur S, Makrides L, Hernandez P. Test-retest reliability of isometric and isokinetic torque in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Physiother Can. 2004;56:94–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sillen MJ, Franssen FM, Delbressine JM, Vaes AW, Wouters EF, Spruit MA. Efficacy of lower-limb muscle training modalities in severely dyspnoeic individuals with COPD and quadriceps muscle weakness: results from the DICES trial. Thorax. 2014;69:525–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    de Bruin P, Ueki J, Watson A, Pride N. Size and strength of the respiratory and quadriceps muscles in patients with chronic asthma. Eur Respir J. 1997;10:59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Seymour JM, Ward K, Sidhu PS, Puthucheary Z, Steier J, Jolley CJ, Rafferty G, Polkey MI, Moxham J. Ultrasound measurement of rectus femoris cross-sectional area and the relationship with quadriceps strength in COPD. Thorax. 2009;64:418–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166:111–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Mendoza L, Horta P, Espinoza J, Aguilera M, Balmaceda N, Castro A, Ruiz M, Díaz O, Hopkinson NS. Pedometers to enhance physical activity in COPD: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2015;45:347–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jones PW, Quirk F, Baveystock C. The St George’s respiratory questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991;85:25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Tafti SF, Cheraghvandi A, Marashian M, Emami H, Mokri B. Measurement of the validity and reliability of the persian translation of the saint george respiratory questionnaire for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Open Respir Med J. 2009;3:107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Montazeri A, Vahdaninia M, Ebrahimi M, Jarvandi S. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS): translation and validation study of the Iranian version. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003;1:14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: an updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamad Reza Sedighi Moghadam
    • 1
  • Mostafa Ghanei
    • 2
    Email author
  • Klaus Kenn
    • 3
  • Nicholas S. Hopkinson
    • 4
  1. 1.Janbazan Medical and Engineering Research Centre (JMERC)TehranIran
  2. 2.Chemical Injuries Center, Systems Biology and Poisonings Institute, Baqiyatallah University of Medical SciencesTehranIran
  3. 3.Schön Klinik Berchtesgadener LandSchönau am KönigsseeGermany
  4. 4.National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine, Royal Brompton CampusLondonUK

Personalised recommendations