Advertisement

Critical Care

, 23:33 | Cite as

Electrophysiological investigations of peripheral nerves and muscles: a method for looking at cell dysfunction in the critically ill patients

  • Nicola LatronicoEmail author
  • Oliver Friedrich
Open Access
Editorial

Keywords

Muscle weakness Polyneuropathy Myopathy Organ dysfunction Mitochondrial dysfunction Energy metabolism 

Resting trans-membrane potential difference (Em) of skeletal muscle is correlated to the energy status of the organism: the more severe the illness, the lower the Em. In 1971, Cunningham demonstrated this association with severely debilitating medical conditions, showing an increase in intracellular sodium concentration possibly due to a “generalized cellular abnormality” [1]. The study posed the basis for considering local (muscle) bio-electrical events generated by excitable tissues as indicative of the well-being of the entire organism. In 1995, Leijten showed that patients with electrophysiological signs of polyneuropathy had increased intensive care unit (ICU) mortality, more prolonged rehabilitation, and persistent 1-year motor handicap than those without [2]. In 1996, Latronico demonstrated normal nerve histology, despite electrophysiological findings of axonal neuropathy, in biopsies taken in the early stage of acute disease. In late biopsies, however, axonal nerve degeneration was evident [2]. This generated the hypothesis that functional (electrical) impairment may precede structural (histologic) changes and that electrophysiological study (EPS) might be used to look indirectly but non-invasively at cell functioning. During sepsis, a prototypical low-energy hyper-catabolic state, the nerves were trying to maintain their structure and survive by reducing or abolishing the function, a phenomenon easily documented by EPS. If sepsis persisted, the energy supply and/or use might not be restored and the histologic alterations would eventually ensue. According to this theory of the bioenergetic failure, “stunned but still living peripheral nerves and muscles may serve as a sentinel for the development of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome” [3]. In 1999, Hotchkiss described a similar divergence between in vivo clinical evidence of organ failure and post-mortem histologic absence of extensive organ damage sufficient to explain the morbidity and mortality of sepsis [4]. They also hypothesized that in situations of energy failure the cells may revert to a low energy state, a “hibernation” of the cell, to avoid cell death. The theory received support from two multi-center clinical studies, CRIMYNE [5] and CRIMYNE-2 [6], showing that the peroneal nerve, a long lower limb motor nerve, was the most commonly affected nerve. The axons are devoid of the machinery for biosynthetic processes, and all axonal components are synthesized in the cell body. Their anterograde transportation to the nerve terminal requires considerable energy expenditure and may fail if the nerve does not receive adequate nourishment [5].

A reversible neuropathy was exactly matched in a rat sepsis model, with decreased action potential amplitudes of dorsal root axons by day 3 of sepsis with normal nerve morphology [7]. At this time point, there was no major resting membrane depolarization, nor decrease in membrane input resistance that could explain the reduced availability of voltage-gated Na+-channels (VGSC) for action potential transmission. Also, electrolytes were unaltered. Instead, a hyperpolarizing shift in Na+-channel inactivation was found as the predominant factor underlying the reversible nerve inexcitability [7]. This acquired VGCS channelopathy seems one of the earliest consequences of critical illness [7, 8]. Even preceding this electrical failure in axons may be the ability for coordinated repetitive firing within the motor neurons in the early phases of sepsis where nerve conduction still appears normal. Unstable motor neuron spikes during maintained direct current stimulation of spinal cord motor neurons in septic rats prevented a steady force production in muscle [9]. Decreased VGSC availability in skeletal muscles during experimental sepsis is attributed to upregulated expression of Nav1.5 isoforms (normally expressed during early maturation) over the adult Nav1.4 isoform [7]. Nav1.5 have a more negative half-inactivation potential compared to Nav1.4; thereby, the availability of activatable VGSC at normal Em is already markedly reduced and the rheobase action potential is small and eventually fades. It has been speculated that this differential isoform expression represents a universal reaction of excitable organs to systemic inflammation [7]. The mechanism by which VGSC availability can also be reduced is through posttranslational modifications, e.g., phosphorylation. The VGSC α-subunit has several intracellular phosphorylation sites to modify Na+ ion gating as well as channel inactivation. Intriguingly, very fast phosphorylation of VGSCs (~minutes) was shown by exposure to pro-inflammatory cytokines (e.g., TNF-α, IL-2, CNTF ciliary neurotrophic factor), producing a maximum inhibition of 75% of Na+ currents through channel phosphorylation and hyperpolarizing shift of steady-state inactivation. This was abolished by protein kinase C blockade and also almost completely reversible after cytokine washout. This links the severity of neuropathy (and myopathy) in critical illness to the flush of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which, over time, crosses towards bioenergetics failure and, ultimately, structural damage. Inflammation, hypoxia, and ischemia increase local nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species production that lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and ATP depletion in nerve axons [8]. ATPase run-down results in depolarized Em with persistent Na+ influx through nerve Nav1.6 and intracellular Ca2+ overload (reverse Na/Ca-exchanger activity) [8]. Cytokine-dependent activation of ATP-consuming proteolytic pathways worsens the situation and, in time, drives structural axonopathy, which is also promoted by glucose toxicity. These complex series of events, which are summarized in Fig. 1, find their clinical counterpart in the systemic inflammation and critical illness with artificial ventilation and mechanical silencing that ultimately lead to structurally-related organ failure, i.e., in nerves with structural axonopathies and in muscle with preferential myosin loss and muscle necrosis (reviewed in [10]).
Fig. 1

Mechanisms leading to neuromuscular inexcitability during early to intermediate phases of sepsis and critical illness. The very early phases of systemic inflammation are reflected by motor neuron repetitive firing failure followed by development of an acquired channelopathy of voltage-gated Na+-channels (VGSC) in peripheral nerves and muscles. In the course of critical illness, metabolism-related inexcitability adds another level through ATP depletion. At later stage, structural changes prevail (not shown). Reversibility declines with each added layer of mechanism. PKC, protein kinase C; CNTF, ciliary neurotrophic factor; ROS, reactive oxygen species

Several clinical studies have shown an association of EPS alterations with clinical severity, most notably studies on intensive insulin treatment in surgical and medical ICU patients (reviewed in) [11], as well as an association with morbidity [12], and with hospital [13] and 1-year mortality [14]. Most recently, Kelmenson and colleagues have shown that patients with abnormal EPS had significantly fewer 28-day ICU-free days, a worse discharge disposition and higher mortality in the ICU and in the hospital when compared to patients with normal EPS [15]. So, in the last half century, a considerable amount of evidence has demonstrated that reduced bodily energy production, as it can be inferred from altered EPS, can be associated with disease severity and can be predictive of ominous prognoses. The time has come that we, as a clinical and scientific community devoted to unraveling the complex pathophysiology and timely treatment of multiple organ failure, would consider a wider adoption of EPS into the daily clinical practice.

Notes

Acknowledgements

None for this Editorial.

Funding

None for this Editorial.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Authors’ contributions

NL conceived the manuscript and wrote the part dedicated to the general and clinical aspects of the syndrome. OF wrote the part dedicated to the pathophysiological mechanisms of the syndrome and drew the figure. Both authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Both authors have reviewed the final version of the manuscript and approve the manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Cunningham JN, Carter NW, Rector FC, Seldin DW. Resting transmembrane potential difference of skeletal muscle in normal subjects and severely ill patients. J Clin Invest. 1971;50:49–59 Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5101298.
  2. 2.
    Latronico N, Bolton CF. Critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy: a major cause of muscle weakness and paralysis. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10:931–41 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21939902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Latronico N. Monitoring of peripheral nerves and muscle function in patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2000;28:3375 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11009019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hotchkiss RS, Swanson PE, Freeman BD, Tinsley KW, Cobb JP, Matuschak GM, et al. Apoptotic cell death in patients with sepsis, shock, and multiple organ dysfunction. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1230–51 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10446814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Latronico N, Bertolini G, Guarneri B, Botteri M, Peli E, Andreoletti S, et al. Simplified electrophysiological evaluation of peripheral nerves in critically ill patients: the Italian multi-centre CRIMYNE study. Crit Care. 2007;11:R11 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17254336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Latronico N, Nattino G, Guarneri B, Fagoni N, Amantini A, Bertolini G. Validation of the peroneal nerve test to diagnose critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy in the intensive care unit: the multicentre Italian CRIMYNE-2 diagnostic accuracy study. F1000Res. 2014;3:127 Available from: http://f1000research.com/articles/3-127/v3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Novak KR, Nardelli P, Cope TC, Filatov G, Glass JD, Khan J, et al. Inactivation of sodium channels underlies reversible neuropathy during critical illness in rats. J Clin Invest. 2009;119:1150–8 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19425168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Waxman SG. Axonal conduction and injury in multiple sclerosis: the role of sodium channels. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:932–41 Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17115075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Nardelli P, Vincent JA, Powers R, Cope TC, Rich MM. Reduced motor neuron excitability is an important contributor to weakness in a rat model of sepsis. Exp Neurol. 2016;282:1–8 Available from:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2016.04.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Friedrich O, Reid MB, Van den Berghe G, Vanhorebeek I, Hermans G, Rich MM, et al. The sick and the weak: neuropathies/myopathies in the critically ill. Physiol Rev. 2015;95:1025–109 Available from: http://www.physiology.org/doi/10.1152/physrev.00028.2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Latronico N, Herridge M, Hopkins RO, Angus D, Hart N, Hermans G, et al. The ICM research agenda on intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:1270–81 Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00134-017-4757-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kelmenson DA, Quan D, Nordon-Craft A, Malone D, Schenkman M, Moss M. Electrophysiological abnormalities can differentiate pre-hospital discharge functional status in critically ill patients with normal strength. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42:1504–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moss M, Yang M, Macht M, Sottile P, Gray L, McNulty M, et al. Screening for critical illness polyneuromyopathy with single nerve conduction studies. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:683–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hermans G, Van Mechelen H, Bruyninckx F, Vanhullebusch T, Clerckx B, Meersseman P, et al. Predictive value for weakness and 1-year mortality of screening electrophysiology tests in the ICU. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41:2138–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelmenson DA, Quan D, Moss M. What is the diagnostic accuracy of single nerve conduction studies and muscle ultrasound to identify critical illness polyneuromyopathy: a prospective cohort study. Crit Care. 2018;22:342 Available from: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-018-2281-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public HealthUniversity of BresciaBresciaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and EmergencySpedali Civili University HospitalBresciaItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Medical Biotechnology, Department of Chemical and Biological EngineeringFriedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-NuernbergErlangenGermany
  4. 4.School of Medical SciencesUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  5. 5.Victor Chang Cardiac Research InstituteSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations