Advertisement

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies for multiple myeloma

  • Chao Wu
  • Lina Zhang
  • Qierra R. Brockman
  • Fenghuang Zhan
  • Lijuan ChenEmail author
Open Access
Review

Abstract

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common hematologic malignancy and remains incurable despite the advent of numerous new drugs such as proteasome inhibitors (PIs), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs), and monoclonal antibodies. There is an unmet need to develop novel therapies for refractory/relapsed MM. In the past few years, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cell therapy for MM has shown promising efficacy in preclinical and clinical studies. Furthermore, the toxicities of CAR-T cell therapy are manageable. This article summarizes recent developments of CAR-T therapy in MM, focusing on promising targets, new technologies, and new research areas. Additionally, a comprehensive overview of antigen selection is presented along with preliminary results and future directions of CAR-T therapy development.

Keywords

Chimeric antigen receptors Multiple myeloma Immunotherapy Tumor immunology 

Abbreviations

ADC

Antibody-drug conjugates

ADCC

Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity

AE

Adverse event

ALL

Acute lymphocytic leukemia

APRIL

A proliferation-inducing ligand

ASCO

American Society Clinical Oncology

ASCT

Autologous stem cell transplantation

ASH

American Society of Hematology

BAFF

B cell-activating factor of the TNF family

BCL2

B cell lymphoma-2

BCMA

B cell mature antigen

BsAb

Bispecific antibody

CARs

Chimeric antigen receptors

CAR-T

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells

CD

Cluster of differentiation

CLL

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia

CR

Complete remission

CRAB

Hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone destruction

CRS

Cytokine release syndrome

DLBCL

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma

ECM

Extracellular matrix

EHA

European Hematology Association

FcRγ

Fc receptor γ chain

FDA

Food and Drug Administration

FISH

Fluorescence in situ hybridization

FLC

Free light chain

GM-CSF

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor

GvHD

Graft-versus-host disease

ICOS

Inducible costimulator

IFNγ

Interferon-γ

IL

Interleukin

LDC

Low-density lipoprotein

LM

Lorvotuzumab mertansine

mAb

Monoclonal antibody

MCL1

Myeloid cell leukemia-1

MHC

Major histocompatibility complex

MM

Multiple myeloma

MMSC

Multiple myeloma stem cell

MR

Minimal remission

MRD

Minimal residual disease

MTD

Maximum tolerated dose

mTPI-2

Modified toxicity probability interval 2

NK

Natural killer

NSG

NOD scid gamma

ORR

Overall response rate

PD

Progressive disease

PD-1

Programmed cell death protein 1

PET-CT

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography

PFS

Progression-free survival

PN

Peripheral neuropathy

PR

Partial remission

PR

Partial remission

qPCR

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

RD

Lenalidomide and dexamethasone

RRMM

Relapse/refractory multiple myeloma

ScFv

Single-chain variable fragment

sCR

Strict complete remission

SD

Stable disease

SLAMF7

Signaling lymphocyte activation molecule F7

TAC

T cell antigen coupler

TACI

Transmembrane activator and CAML interactor

TCR

T cell receptor

TNF

Tumor necrosis factor

VGPR

Very good partial remission

Background

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a hematological malignancy characterized by the proliferation of transformed monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM) [1]. MM is the second most common hematologic malignancy and is difficult to cure. It accounts for 1% of all cancers with a worldwide incidence rate estimated to be 6 –7 cases per 100,000 persons. Generally, MM patients show clinical symptoms including hypercalcemia, renal insufficiency, anemia, and bone destruction (CRAB) [2, 3].

Until the year 2000, the standard therapy for MM was melphalan- or doxorubicin-based regimens with corticosteroids. Introduction of proteasome inhibitors (PIs; e.g., bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib), histone deacetylase inhibitors (e.g., panobinostat), immunomodulatory agents (IMiDs; e.g., thalidomide, lenalidomide, and pomalidomide), and monoclonal antibodies (e.g., daratumumab and elotuzumab) has provided numerous therapeutic avenues for patients with MM. Despite these advanced therapies, most MM patients eventually relapse and become resistant to treatment, and the length and depth of response to therapies typically decrease in the following relapse. Therefore, it is essential to develop novel alternative treatment strategies that can combat chemotherapeutic resistance. Immunotherapy utilizing T cell immunity has become a new treatment to eliminate cancer cells. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has emerged as a novel immunotherapy which modifies T cells with CAR, an artificial fusion protein that incorporates an extracellular antigen recognition domain, a transmembrane domain, and an intracellular domain including costimulation and signaling components [4, 5]. Many promising early results of CAR-T have been reported in MM, and more CAR-T clinical studies are currently being conducted [6, 7, 8, 9]. This review summarizes the progress of CAR-T therapy in MM.

Target selection for CAR-T therapy

The choice of target is critical for CAR-T therapy. Due to the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of MM cells, surface antigen expression on MM cells from the same patient might be variable [10, 11, 12]. Targeted antigens should be expressed specifically on MM cells to avoid on-target/off-tumor toxicity [13]. However, these MM-specific antigens have yet to be identified. Several antigens have been used as targets for CAR-T cell therapy against MM, including B cell maturation antigen (BCMA), CD19, CD138, signaling lymphocytic activation molecule 7 (SLAM7), and immunoglobulin light chains. The latest and most promising clinical trials are described in detail below.

CAR-T therapy targeting BCMA

BCMA, a member of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily, is exclusively expressed in a subpopulation of B cells, normal plasma cells, and malignant plasma cells. BCMA is not present in other hematological cells like hematopoietic stem cells or other tissues. It is closely associated with B cell-activating factor of the TNF family (BAFF) receptor, transmembrane activator, calcium modulator, and cyclophilin ligand interactor (TACI) [14]. Moreover, BCMA plays an essential role in regulating B cell maturation and differentiation into plasma cells. It facilitates B cell survival at different stages of development by engaging a proliferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) and BAFF [15]. Two main advantages of BCMA as an antigen for CAR-T therapy are the potential reduction of on-target/off-tumor toxicity and the lack of antigen-dependent reduction in CAR-T cell expansion [16]. A potential disadvantage of BCMA is that soluble BCMA can be released or shed from tumors into the the surrounding tissues and into the circulation. Soluble BCMA can potentially block the recognition of BCMA+ MM cells by BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells [17]. Nevertheless, the role of BCMA in the development of MM makes it the most popular target in MM CAR-T therapy.

In addition to CAR-T therapy, BCMA is also targeted for bispecific T cell treatment and antibody-drug conjugates (ADC). A bispecific T cell engager (BiTE) targeting BCMA and CD3ɛ (AMG420), and an anti-BCMA antibody-drug conjugate (GSK2857916) have demonstrated activity in the treatment of relapsed/refractory (RR) MM [18, 19].

First-in-human CAR-T clinical trial targeting BCMA

The National Cancer Institute implemented the first clinical trial of CAR-T cells targeting BCMA (NCT02215967). The anti-BCMA CAR contains a murine single-chain variable fragment (scFv), a CD8α hinge and transmembrane region, a CD28 costimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ signaling domain. A total of 24 patients were enrolled, and the study tested 4 doses: 0.3 × 106, 1 × 106, 3 × 106, and 9 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg. The lowest dose of 0.3–3.0 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg showed a minimal anti-tumor activity with an overall response rate (ORR) of 20%. Among the 16 patients treated with 9 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg, the ORR was 81%. Notably, all the 11 patients that demonstrated a partial response or better were found to be minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative. However, significant cytokine release syndrome (CRS)-related toxicities were reported in patients treated at the highest dose (9 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg). Additionally, the study suggested that patients with a high tumor burden were more likely to develop a high grade of CRS [8]. Currently, the development of many advanced BCMA-targeted CAR-T therapies is ongoing or completed, and most are registered as clinical trials for RRMM.

bb2121

Data from the phase 1 study of bb2121 (NCT02658929) was published in the NEJM recently [20]. The BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell product bb2121 was infused in 33 RRMM patients. In this study, autologous T cells were transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding a novel CAR with an anti-BCMA scFv, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, and a CD3ζ signaling domain [21]. Of these MM patients, 67% had an International Staging System (ISS) stage II or III disease, 27% had an extramedullary disease, and 45% had a high-risk cytogenetic profile defined by the presence of del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16). The study design included a dose-escalation phase and a dose-expansion phase. Doses of 50 × 106, 150 × 106, 450 × 106, or 800 × 106 CAR-T cells were infused in patients in the dose-escalation phase and 150 × 106 to 450 × 106 CAR-T cells in the dose-expansion phase. The ORR was 85% with 12 stringent complete responses (sCRs), 3 complete responses (CRs), 9 very good partial responses (VGPRs), and 4 partial responses (PRs). The median time to the first PR or better was 1 month, and the median duration of response was 10.9 months. The patients infused with at least 150 × 106 CAR-T cells had rapid bone marrow (BM) clearance of plasma cells, and many patients achieved alleviation of extramedullary disease within 1 month. Of the 16 patients who obtained a PR or better, all achieved MRD-negative status (at ≤ 10−4sensitivity). CRS was reported in 25 patients (76%), and most events were grade 1 or 2. In addition, 14 patients (42%) had neurologic toxic effects including 1 patient with a reversible grade 4 neurologic toxic effect. The median time to onset of CRS was 2 days with a median duration time of 5 days. The persistence of CAR-T cells was examined at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months with 96%, 86%, 57%, and 20% of patients having detectable transgene levels, respectively [20, 22].

bb21217

The phase 1 clinical trial of bb21217 is a next generation of anti-BCMA CAR-T therapy following bb2121. The structure of bb21217 is similar to bb2121 with the exception of the added phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitor bb007 during ex vivo culture. This modification was added to enrich the drug product for T cells displaying a memory-like phenotype and made CAR-T cells more persistent and potent. A multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation trial of bb21217 called CRB-402 (NCT03274219) recruited patients with RRMMs who had received ≥ 3 prior regimens. The planned dose levels were similar to CRB-401 (NCT02658929). Currently, 50 patients have been recruited and 7 patients have been treated with 150 × 106 CAR-T cells and were evaluated at a 1-month time point. The results showed 1 sCR, 3 VGPRs, and 2 PRs. Three of 3 evaluable respondents obtained MRD-negative status. All 7 evaluable patients had a robust CAR-T cell expansion during the first 30 days. Five of the 7 patients experienced grade 1–3 CRS [23].

LCAR-B38M

LCAR-B38M is a bispecific CAR-T cell product targeting 2 BCMA epitopes: VHH1 and VHH2. LEGEND-2, a single-arm, open-label, multicenter study (NCT03090659) evaluating LCAR-B38M in patients with advanced RRMMs, was conducted at 4 different sites in China. In the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Jiao Tong University, LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells (median CAR-T cell dose = 0.5 × 106 cells/kg, [range, 0.07–2 × 106]) were given in 3 infusions (20, 30, and 50% of total dose) in 57 patients. Of those, 37% had ISS stage III disease. Overall, the ORR was 88% (50 of 57), with 39 patients (68%) achieving CR, 3 patients (5%) achieving VGPR, and 8 patients (14%) achieving PR. All 39 patients with CR were MRD-negative assessed by 8-color flow cytometry. In addition, the median time to response was 1 month (range, 0.4 to 3.5). In total, 71% of MM patients had no detectable LCAR-B38M CAR-T cells in the peripheral blood at 4 months, and only 5 patients showed CAR-T cells at 10 months after infusion [9]. The safety results of the trial showed that the most common adverse events were pyrexia (91%), CRS (90%), thrombocytopenia (49%), and leukopenia (47%). CRS was mostly grades 1 and 2 (83%), and 4 MM cases (7%) had grade 3 events. The most common signs of end-organ injury in patients with CRS were liver functional abnormalities. The results from the other 3 sites have also been published (ChiCTR-ONH-17012285), with 17 patients infused with anti-BCMA CAR-T cells. All patients had BCMA-positive plasmablasts, 8 received auto-HSCT, and 5 had baseline extramedullary disease. High-risk cytogenetic abnormalities t(4,14) and del(17p) were reported in 6 patients by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The unfavorable prognosis markers gain (1q) and del (13q) were found in 11 and 6 patients, respectively. Two patients had a split FISH signal of IGH without known partner gene involvement. The doses of anti-BCMA CAR-T cells ranged from 0.21 to 1.52 × 106 cells/kg. Eight patients were infused using 3 split doses, and 9 patients were administered with CAR-T cells as a single infusion. The ORR was 88.2% with 13 sCRs and 2 VGPRs at the first response evaluation 1 month after CAR-T cell infusion. Progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 82.4% at 6 months and 52.9% at 12 months, with 1-year overall survival (OS) rate being 82.3%. Sixteen patients experienced varying degrees of CRS, and 1 patient died due to tumor lysis syndrome in addition to CRS. Notably, in patients that responded, most were negative for BM MRD, but clonal plasma cells expressing BCMA always reappeared. No correlation was identified between disease relapse with age, gender, cytogenetic markers, conditioning scheme, CAR-T cell infusion dosage, and delivery method, and initial CR or VGPR. Extramedullary disease was a poor prognostic factor, and patients who previously had auto-HSCT were more likely to obtain a sustained response [24].

P-BCMA-101

P-BCMA-101 is a novel CAR-T cell product using an anti-BCMA Centyrin™ fused to a CD3ζ/4-1BB signaling domain. Centyrins are fully humanized and have high binding affinities. A transposon system (piggyBAC), rather than a viral vector, was used to make them smaller, more stable, and potentially less immunogenic. A phase 1 clinical trial has being conducted in patients with RRMM to assess the safety and efficacy of P-BCMA-101 (NCT03288493). Twelve patients were infused with 48–430 × 106 P-BCMA-101 CAR-T cells in three weight-based cohorts. Respondents in these nine MM patients who have had their first 2-week assessment included one sCR, one with non-secretory disease near CR of the patient’s plasmacytomas by PET/CT, one VGPR, and five PRs. Only one patient had grade 2 cytokine release syndrome [25, 26].

JCARH125

JCARH125 is a BCMA-targeted CAR-T product, containing a lentiviral CAR construct with a fully humanized scFv, optimized spacer, 4-1BB costimulatory, and CD3ζ signaling domains. A multicenter phase 1/2 trial of JCARH125 called EVOLVE (NCT03430011) is ongoing and is recruiting patients with RRMMs. The first 2 dose levels were 50 and 150 × 106 CAR-T cells. Modified toxicity probability interval 2 (mTPI-2) was used to determine the escalation of dose. Each dose level will be evaluated on at least 3 patients. Thus far, 19 MM patients were enrolled, and 13 of them were treated with JCARH125. Eight patients were eligible for the initial evaluation of early clinical response. All 8 patients showed evidence of objective response (≥ MR). Three patients have been confirmed to respond to 50 × 106 CAR-T cells (2 sCRs, 1 PR), and the remaining patients have not been confirmed yet. Grade 1 or 2 CRS was observed in 6 of the 8 (75%) patients [27].

CT053

A multicenter investigator-initiated clinical study has been designed to evaluate CT053 (NCT03915184), a novel autologous CAR-T therapeutic that is genetically modified T cells comprising an extracellular anti-BCMA human scFv, in RRMMs. In total, 16 patients were infused with CT053. Most enrolled patients were treated with a single dose of 1.5 × 108 cells, except for 1 case that was infused with 0.5 × 108 cells and another who received 1.8 × 108 CAR-T cells. Among the 16 patients, 13 of them reached the assessment point and achieved 3 CRs, 6 VGPRs, and 4 PRs. Only 3 patients were observed with grade 1–3 CRS without any neurotoxicity and dose-limiting toxicities [28].

MCARH171

A phase 1 dose-escalation trial of MCARH171 is ongoing to evaluate BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell product’s safety and efficacy on RRMM patients (NCT03070327). This anti-BCMA CAR contains a humanized scFv, a 4-1BB costimulatory domain, and a truncated epidermal growth factor receptor safety system. To date, 11 patients were infused with BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells following a standard 3 + 3 dose design. The mean doses of the 4 dosages were 72 × 106, 137 × 106, 475 × 106, and 818 × 106 viable CAR-T cells. The clinical responses of evaluable patients demonstrated that the ORR was 64%. Four (40%) and 2 (20%) patients were observed with grades 1–2 and grade 3 CRS, respectively. Notably, the extent and duration of clinical responses were all dose-dependent. The patients who received lower doses (72 × 106,137 × 106 CAR-T cells) had a lower peak peripheral blood expansion compared with those treated with higher doses (475 × 106, 818 × 106 CAR-T cells). Furthermore, 16.7% (1 of 6) of patients infused with lower doses had a clinical response lasting > 6 months, while 60% (3 of 5) of patients treated with higher doses had a clinical response lasting > 6 months [29].

BRD015

BRD015 is also a BCMA-targeted CAR-T product containing a lentiviral CAR with a murine anti-BCMA scFv and CD28 costimulation domain. A phase 1 CAR-T trial (ChiCTR-OPC-16009113) using BRD015 has been conducted by the Tongji Hospital of Tongji Medical College, China. A total of 28 MM patients including 26 RRMMs, 1 plasma cell leukemia, and 1 POEMS were enrolled and treated with 5.4–25.0 × 106 CAR-T cells/kg. Twenty-two MM patients were separated into 2 groups based on the BCMA expression on MM cells detected by flow cytometry. Of these, 16 (BCMA+ plasma cells ≥ 50%) and 6 were grouped into the high- and low-BCMA groups, respectively. The ORRs were 87% in the high-BCMA group (73% CR) and 100% in the low-BCMA group (33% CR or VGPR). In addition, clinical responses were positively correlated with peak blood CAR-T cell levels. A potential effect is also demonstrated in patients with the POEMS syndrome [30, 31]. However, the murine BCMA epitope of BRD015 leads to a serious defect that patients would be no longer sensitive to the reinfusion of CAR-T cells.

CT103A

The novel BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell CT103A, which includes a fully humanized BCMA scFv, has been engineered. A single-center, phase 1 trial using CT103A was reported in 2019 EHA and ASCO meetings (ChiCTR1800018137) where nine patients were infused with 1–6 × 106 cells/kg CAR-T cells. All patients achieved a clinical response within 14 days with an ORR of 100% (67% sCR/CR). The CRS was mild in the first two dosages while one patient treated with the highest dose demonstrated dose-limiting toxicity. Notably, three patients who relapsed after infusing BRD015 achieved two CRs and one VGPR following the CT103A therapy [32].

Other data of completed and ongoing BCMA-targeted CAR-T trials are listed in Table 1. Overall, all BCMA-targeted CAR-T therapies showed remarkable efficacy and safety profiles, suggesting that BCMA is a promising target in MM treatment [33, 34, 35].
Table 1

BCMA-targeted CAR-T clinical trials in multiple myeloma

Trial site/company

No. of patients

Costimulatory domain

Conditioning

Study design

Efficacy

Safety

Registration number/references

National Cancer Institute, phase 1

24

CD28

CP/Flu

0.3/1/3/9 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 20% (2 of 10) with 1 VGPR, 1 PR (lower doses)

ORR, 86% (12 of 14) with 1 sCR, 8 VGPRs, 3 PRs (highest dose)

CRS: Gr3/4, none (lower doses)

CRS: Gr3/4, 38% pts (highest dose)

CRES: Gr3/4, 19% pts (highest dose)

NCT02215967 [6, 8]

Multisite phase 1, Bluebird (bb2121)

33

4-1BB

CP/Flu

50/150/450/800 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 85% (28 of 33) with 12 sCRs, 3 CRs, 9 VGPRs, 4 PRs

CRS: Gr1/2, 70% pts; Gr3, 6% pts

CRES: Gr1/2, 39% pts; Gr4, 3% pts

NCT02658929 [20]

Multisite phase 1, Bluebird (bb21217)

8

4-1BB

CP/Flu

150/450/800/1200 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 86%(6 of 7) with 1 sCR, 3 VGPRs, 2 PRs

CRS: Gr1/2, 50% pts; Gr3, 12.5% pts

CRES: Gr4, 12.5% pts

NCT03274219 [23]

Multisite phase1/2, Nanjing Legend, China (LCAR-B38M)(XJTU)

57

4-1BB

CP

0.07–2.1 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 88% (50 of 57) with 39 CRs, 3 VGPRs, 8 PRs

CRS: Gr1/2, 83% pts; Gr3/4, 7% pts

CRES: Gr1, 1.8% pts

NCT03090659 [9]

Multisite phase1/2,Nanjing Legend, China (LCAR-B38M)(RJ, JS, CZ)

17

4-1BB

CP/Flu

0.21–1.52 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 88.2% (15 of 17) with 13 sCRs, 2 VGPRs

Mild CRS, 10 pts; severe but manageable CRS, 6 pts; died of a very severe toxic reaction, 1 pt

ChiCTR-ONH-17012285 [24]

Multisite phase 1, Poseida (P-BCMA-101)

12

4-1BB

CP/Flu

48–430 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 89% (8 of 9 ) with 1 sCR,1 near CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PRs

CRS: Gr2, 1 pt

NCT03288493 [25, 26]

Multisite phase1/2, Juno (JCARH125)

19

4-1BB

CP/Flu

50/150 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 100% (8 of 8) with 1 PR, 2 sCRs 1 CR, 2 VGPRs, 1 PR, 1 MR

CRS: Gr1/2, 75% pts,

CRES, 38% pts

NCT03430011 [27]

Multisite phase1, China (CT053)

16

4-1BB

CP/Flu

0.5/1.5/1.8 × 108 CAR+T cells

ORR, 100% (13 of 13) with 3 CRs, 6 VGPRs, 4 PRs

CRS: only 3 pts 1 each for Gr1-3

CRES: none

NCT03915184 [28]

Celgene/MSKCC, phase 1 (MCARH171)

11

4-1BB

CP/Flu

72/137/475/818 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 64%

CRS: Gr1/2, 40% pts; Gr3, 20% pts

CRES: Gr2, 10% pts

NCT03070327 [29]

Single site phase 1 (BRD015)

28

CD28

CP/Flu

5.4–25.0 × 106CAR+T cells/kg

ORR: BCMA strong expression group, 87%; BCMA weak expression group, 100%

CRS: Gr3, 14% pts

ChiCTR-OPC-16009113 [30]

Single site phase 1 (CT103A)

9

4-1BB

CP/Flu

1/3/6 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 100%(9 of 9) with 4 CRs, 1 VGPR, 4 PRs

Mild CRS (first two dose levels)

DLT: n = 1 (highest dose)

ChiCTR1800018137 [31]

Single site phase 1 (CART-BCMA)

25

4-1BB

CP or none

1–50 × 107 CAR+T cells

ORR, 48%(12 of 25) with 1 sCR, 1 CR, 5 VGPRs, 5 PRs

CRS:Gr3/4, 32% pts

CRES, 12% pts

NCT02546167 [33]

Single site phase 1, HRAIN Biotechnology, China

17

4-1BB

CP/Flu

9 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 79%(11 of 14) with 3 sCRs, 4 CRs, 2 VGPRs, 2 MRs

Mild CRS

NCT03093168 [34]

Multisite phase 1 in China

4

4-1BB

CP/Flu

5/10 × 106 CAR+T cells/kg

ORR, 100% (4 of 4) with 1 CR, 3 PRs

All CRS under Gr3

NCT03661554 [35]

Soochow University, China (BCMA- and CD19-targeted CAR-T combination trial)

8

OX40, CD28

CP/Flu

1 × 107/kg CD19-targeted CAR+T cells; 2.5–8.2 × 107/kg BCMA-targeted CAR+T cells

ORR, 80% (4 of 5) with 1 sCR, 1 VGPR, 2 PRs

Mild CRS

NCT03196414 [36]

Soochow University, China (BCMA- and CD19- targeted CAR-T combination trial)

9

OX40, CD28

Bu-CP + ASCT

1 × 107/kg CD19-targeted CAR+T cells; 2.5-8.2 × 107/kg BCMA-targeted cells

ORR, 100% (9 of 9) with 3 CRs, 6 VGPRs

Mild CRS

NCT03455972 [37]

Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, China (BCMA- and CD19-targeted CAR-T combination trial)

21

4-1BB

CP/Flu

1 × 106/kg both BCMA-and CD19-targeted CAR+T cells

ORR, 95% (20 of 21) with 9 sCRs, 3 CRs, 5 VGPRs, 3PRs

CRS: Gr1–2, 86%

Gr3, 5%

ChiCTR-OIC-17011272 [42]

Abbreviations: BCMA B cell maturation antigen, CAR chimeric antigen receptor, CRS cytokine release syndrome, CRES cell related encephalopathy syndrome, pts patients, Gr grade, VGPR very good partial response, SD stable disease, CR complete response, PR partial response, sCR stringent complete response, ORR overall response rate, MR minimal response, RRMM relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, DLT dose-limiting toxicity, ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation, CP cyclophosphamide, Flu fludarabine, Bu busulphan

CAR-T therapy targeting CD19

CD19 belongs to the immunoglobulin superfamily and acts as a dominant signaling component of a multimolecular complex on the surface of mature B cells. It is present in many B cell malignancies such as acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [38]. CD19 is rarely expressed on MM cells, thus not an ideal target for the treatment of MM. However, recent studies have revealed that CD19 is expressed on a minor MM stem cell subset. The multiple myeloma stem cells (MMSCs) are defined as a population of tumor cells that possess the capabilities of self-renewal and drug resistance [39]. CD19 is also associated with the BM microenvironment-related drug resistance in MM [40]. Therefore, CD19 is a potential target for MM. Garfall et al. reported that the CD19-targeted CAR-T cell therapy (CTL019) infusion led to a durable complete response in an advanced refractory MM patient after a high-dose of melphalan treatment and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) [7]. A further report from this group presented the complete data of the clinical trial (NCT02135406) including ten MM patients who were infused CTL019 cells after high-dose melphalan and ASCT. Two patients had significantly prolonged PFS after ASCT + CTL019 compared with ASCT alone, indicating that the CTL019 product and administration post-ASCT are safe and feasible in advanced MM patients [41].

CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR-T combination trial

In 2017, Fu et al. from the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University examined the safety and efficacy by combining CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells in RRMM patients (NCT 03196414) [36]. The CAR used in this study was a third-generation construct containing an anti-BCMA and anti-CD19 scFv, a cytoplasmic portion of the OX40 and CD28 costimulatory moiety, and a CD3ζ T cell signaling domain. Eight RRMM patients received 1 × 107/kg CD19-targeted CAR-T cells on day 0. Then, patients were infused with 40% BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells on day 1, and the remaining 60% cells were infused on day 2. Five of the 8 patients had the following response evaluation results: sCR (n = 1), VGPR (n = 1), PRs (n = 2), and SD (n = 1). CRS in all 5 treated patients was lower than grade 2 [36]. At ASH 2018, Fu et al. also presented results from a study of the CAR-T cell therapy (SZ-MM-CART02 study, NCT 03455972) [37]. The CAR-T cells were infused into patients on day 14 to day 20 after autologous transplantation. The dose and administration were the same as the first study. To date, 9 patients have been studied, and the ORR was 100% with 3 CRs, 2 VGPRs, and 4 PRs. This response improved to 3 CRs and 6 VGPRs after CAR-T therapy, and MRD negativity increased from 37.5 to 66.7% after CAR-T infusion and autologous transplantation. CRS in these patients were grades 1 and 2 [37].

Recently, the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University published the results of a single-arm, phase 2 trial (ChiCTR-OIC-17011272) targeting both BCMA and CD19 in patients with RRMM. Twenty-one patients were infused with both 1 × 106 humanized anti-CD19 CAR-T cells/kg and 1 × 106 murine anti-BCMA CAR-T cells/kg. All patients reached the evaluation point. The ORR was 95% with 9 (43%) sCRs, 3 (14%) CRs, 5 (24%) VGPRs, and 3 (14%) PRs. Seventeen (81%) evaluable patients had MRD while 94% of them achieved negative status within 1 month after CAR-T cell infusion. In addition, 19 (90%) patients experienced CRS with 86% grades 1–2 and 5% grade 3 [42]. Other data of CD19- and BCMA-targeted CAR-T combination trial are listed in Table 1.

CAR-T therapy targeting NY-ESO-1

NY-ESO-1 belongs to the family of cancer/testis (CT) antigens. It is expressed in several types of cancers, including up to 60% of patients with relapsed MMs. Schuberth et al. constructed re-directed CD8þ effector T cells expressing CARs, which recognized the HLA-A*02-01-NY-ESO-1157-165 peptide complex [43]. This study showed that anti-NY-ESO-1 re-directed T cells could recognize MM cells endogenously expressing NY-ESO-1 and were able to lyse target cells and secrete antigen-specific Interferon (IFN)γ. Interestingly, some of the re-directed T cells showed an effector memory phenotype and secreted IFNγ when stimulated with NY-ESO-1 [43]. Therefore, NY-ESO-1 is another potential target for MM. Anti-NY-ESO-1 treatment has also been assessed in a phase 1/2 trial of TCR-transduced T cells in 20 MM patients after an autologous stem cell transplant. In total, 16 of 20 patients (80%) with advanced disease had good clinical responses, with a median PFS of 19.1 months [44]. In the latest study, the ORR at day 100 from 25 patients was 76% (1 sCR, 12 VGPRs, 6 PRs); at year 1, 13 patients were progression-free (52%), and 11 were responders (1 sCR, 1 CR, 8 VGPRs, 1 PRs) [45]. In addition, redirected CAR-T cells successfully exhibited anti-MM activity in an A2/NY-ESO-1157-specific manner [46].

CAR-T therapy targeting Kappa light chain

It is recognized that T cell surface immunoglobulins are not generally expressed on plasma cells. However, Ramos et al. constructed a kappa-specific CAR that could recognize kappa-restricted MM cells [47]. Although cell-surface immunoglobulins are not expressed on all plasma cells, it was postulated that MM stem cells express surface immunoglobulins. Therefore, kappa light chain may also be a potential target for MM [47]. MDX-1097 is an anti-kappa free light chain mAb for MM. In a phase 1 clinical trial, 2 patients showed an encouraging result. One patient had a serum free light chain (FLC) level decreased by 55–61%. The other one showed an almost complete metabolic response determined by a PET scan 30 days after the infusion of MDX-1097 [48]. In a phase 2 multiple dose trial, 1 had a VGPR and 2 had PRs from 19 patients. Ten patients had SD six months after the initial infusion and 2 patients showed disease progression [48]. In another study by Ramos et al. using a CAR-targeting kappa light chain, 4 of 7 MM patients achieved responses after infusion with kappa-targeted CAR-T cells, including SD (> 24 months), minimal remission, or overall improvement of MM [47].

CAR-T therapy targeting CD44 variant 6

CD44 is a glycoprotein which is broadly expressed on hematologic and epithelial tumors.CD44 isoform variant 6 (CD44v6) has been reported to be expressed by 43% of MM cases [49]. Bivatuzumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting CD44v6 and was previously shown to be safe in a phase 1 radioimmunotherapy trial [50]. The main toxicity of bivatuzumab mertansine is against the skin, and the majority of skin reactions are reversible. However, one fatal drug-related adverse event was reported. Development was discontinued before reaching the maximum tolerated dose [50]. Anti-CD44v6 CAR-T cells were constructed and tested by Casucci et al. CD44v6-targeted CAR-T cells did not recognize hematopoietic stem cells and keratinocytes but did cause reversible monocytopenia [51]. The EURE-CAR-T project is to conduct a multicenter, first-in-man phase 1/2 clinical trial to demonstrate the safety and the efficacy of CD44v6-targeted CAR-T cell immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia and MM. The project started on January 1, 2017, and will continue until December 2020 (for more details, see https://www.eure-cart.eu/).

CAR-T therapy targeting CD56

CD56 is a cell surface glycoprotein belonging to the immunoglobulin superfamily [52]. It is known to mediate cell-cell and cell-matrix interactions and is strongly expressed on malignant plasma cells in up to 78% of MM patients. It is also expressed on the surface of neural cells, epithelial cells, NK cells, and a subpopulation of activated T cells in normal tissues [52]. HuN901, a humanized monoclonal antibody which binds to CD56, showed a potent anti-myeloma activity in vitro and in vivo. Additionally, the study of HuN901 in murine models showed a well-tolerated dose [53]. These results support clinical trials for this agent. Lorvotuzumab mertansine (LM) is an antibody-drug conjugate which targets CD56+MM. The single-agent LM or LM in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone showed a promising activity against CD56+MM [54]. CAR-Ts, constructed by Benjamin et al., incorporating anti-CD56 scFv specifically reacted against MM cells in a preclinical study [55]. A serious concern with CD56-targeted CAR-T cells is the potential neurologic toxicity due to CD56 expression in the central and peripheral nervous systems.

CAR-T therapy targeting CD70

CD70 (CD27L) is a member of the tumor necrosis factor family and is aberrantly expressed on some solid as well as hematological malignancies, including MM [56]. CD70 has highly restricted the expression on normal cells which makes it an attractive target for monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapies. SGN-70, a humanized anti-CD70 antibody developed by McEarchern et al., possesses Fc-dependent antibody effector functions and mediates anti-tumor activity in vivo [56]. BMS-936561 and SGN-75 are two specific monoclonal antibodies against CD70 [57, 58]. In a phase 1 study, an acceptable safety profile was reported. Results from a preclinical test also supported the safety and efficacy of a CD27-containing CAR targeting CD70-expressing tumors [59]. Furthermore, a lower risk of fratricidal killing is an advantage using CD70 antibody because CD70 is transiently expressed on immune cells. Two papers published in 2017 reported that CD70-targeted CAR-T therapies confer strong anti-tumor responses in human cancer cells and animal models [60, 61]. However, the therapeutic effect of CD70-targeted CAR-T cells in MM is not clear yet.

CAR-T therapy targeting CD38

CD38 is a transmembrane glycoprotein involved in cell adhesion, signal transduction, and calcium regulation [62]. It is generally expressed on precursors of B cells, plasma cells, T cells, NK cells, and myeloid precursors. In normal tissues, it is also expressed on prostate cells, nervous system, guts, muscle cells, and osteoclasts [63]. CD38 is highly expressed in MM cells. Several monoclonal antibodies targeting CD38 have been tested clinically in MM. Daratumumab is the first human anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody approved to treat MM patients. It exerts anti-MM activity through antibody-dependent T cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), complement-dependent cytotoxicity, and antibody-dependent phagocytosis. Daratumumab is approved for the treatment of RRMM or as a single frontline agent or in a combination with other agents [64]. A second anti-CD38 mAb, SAR650984 (known as isatuximab), also showed potent preclinical and clinical anti-MM activity [65]. Given the anti-MM responses observed with daratumumab and isatuximab, the feasibility for developing CD38-targeted CAR-T cells is currently being explored. The results from the anti-CD38 mAbs suggested that anti-CD38 CAR-T cells could proliferate, produce cytokines, and lyse CD38+ MM cells. The potential problem is that these anti-CD38 CAR-T cells lyse not only CD38+ MM cells, but also CD38+ normal hematopoietic cells as well as other normal tissues expressing CD38. To avoid this problem, light-chain exchange technology is being used [66]. Additionally, a construction of anti-CD38 CAR-T with caspase-9-based suicide genes might be effective [67]. Recently, CD38-targeted CAR-T cells have been under investigation as a monotherapy for RRMM patients (NCT03464916). Many other clinical trials are exploring combinations of CD38-targeted CAR-T cells with other target antigens, including CD19 (NCT03125577) and BCMA (NCT03767751).

CAR-T therapy targeting CD138

CD138, also known as syndecan 1, is a membrane protein and a member of the syndecan family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans. It is an adhesion molecule that binds to the extracellular matrix (ECM) molecules collagen and fibronectin, and also promotes cell proliferation [68, 69]. CD138 is expressed on most malignant and normal plasma cells but is absent from other hematopoietic cells, including T and B cells [70]. Therefore, CD138 is an ideal and specific target for the MM treatment. However, CD138 is also expressed in mature epithelial cells. Anti-CD138 could cause skin and/or mucosal toxicities (e.g., mucositis, stomatitis, hand/foot syndrome). Maytansinoid used the CD138 antibody (BT062, known clinically as indatuximab) as an immunoconjugate to treat MM patients. In a phase 1/2 clinical trial of BT062, only 1 out of 23 patients showed an objective clinical response [71]. However, when BT062 was combined with lenalidomide, the overall response rate was increased to 83% [72]. A study of CD138-targeted CAR-T therapy was conducted by Chinese PLA General Hospital (NCT01886976) on 5 RRMM patients, who were pretreated with chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation. The results showed that 4 of 5 patients had SD for more than 3 months, and 1 patient with advanced plasma cell leukemia had a reduction of MM cells in the peripheral blood from 10.5% to < 3% [73]. Despite the attractiveness of CD138 as a target for MM, the shedding of CD138 from malignant cells is a potential drawback. Avoiding skin toxicity and potential combination treatments are also topics of interest for future studies [74].

CAR-T therapy targeting SLAMF7

SLAMF7 is a member of the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule family, which is under intense investigation as a target for immunotherapy in MM. It is also known as CD319 or CS1 [75, 76]. SLAMF7 is expressed on several hematologic cells such as plasma cells, NK cells, activated B cells and monocytes, some CD8+ T cells, and dendritic cells. SLAMF7 is absent on non-hematologic organs and hematopoietic stem cells, which makes it as a promising CAR target in MM [75, 77, 78]. The function of SLAMF7 in MM progression is still under investigation. Elotuzumab is a humanized immunoglobulin G kappa (IgG-κ) antibody which targets SLAMF7 [79]. Elotuzomab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone was approved by the FDA in November 2015 for the treatment of MM patients who had received 1–3 prior therapies [79]. SLAMF7 expression on normal lymphocytes impacts the SLAMF7-targeted CAR-T cell therapy, especially in the culture and proliferation of SLAMF7-targeted CAR-T cells. Several SLAMF7-targeted CAR-T cell products are to be evaluated in clinical trials. UCARTCS1, which contained healthy and allogeneic T cells loaded with an anti-SLAMF7 CAR, was developed using TALEN-targeted gene editing [80]. When UCARTCS1 was tested in vitro and in mouse models, it showed the ability to target SLAMF7 and lyse MM cells.

CAR-T therapy targeting GPRC5D

GPRC5D is a human orphan family C G protein-coupled receptor universally expressed in CD138+ cells [81]. Many studies have reported that GPRC5D is a promising target in MM treatment [82, 83]. However, studies of GPRC5D have only found GPRC5D mRNA expression in BM cells derived from MM patients. GPRC5D protein expression has been undetectable on MM cells via flow cytometry [84]. Recently, Smith et al. used quantitative immunofluorescence to detect the expression of GPRC5D on CD138+ cells and observed that GPRC5D is expressed on 98% of the CD138+ cells [85]. Specificity tests for the expression of GPRC5D in 30 non-plasma tissues showed that GPRC5D was only expressed on hair follicle cells. Based on this data, Smith et al. constructed GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T cells which exhibited significant anti-MM effects on MM cell lines and human MM cell lines (ffLuc+) xenografted in the NSG mice [85]. It is worth noting that GPRC5D-targeted CAR-T cells also showed activity in a murine model of post-BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells treated antigen escape. Overall, these results suggest that GPRC5D could play an important role in CAR-T therapy of MM patients.

CAR-T therapy targeting NKG2DL

NKG2D is a highly conserved transmembrane protein that can recognize several ligands such as MICA, MICB, and the UL16-binding proteins (ULBP) which are upregulated in response to DNA damage, infection by certain pathogens, and malignant transformation. NKG2D ligands are expressed on many solid tumors and hematologic malignancies, including AML and MM. These ligands are usually absent on other normal tissues; therefore, NKG2DL is a novel promising target in MM CAR-T therapy. A single-center phase 1 study conducted by the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute has evaluated the safety and efficacy of NKG2DL-targeted CAR-T cells in RRMM patients. Five patients were infused with NKG2DL-targeted CAR-T cells following a modified Fibonacci “3 + 3” dose-escalation design. The study proposed to test four dosages ranging from 1 × 106 to 3 × 107 cells. Objective clinical responses to NKG2DL-targeted CAR-T cell therapy alone were not observed, and CRS was not reported in these five MM patients [86].

The detailed results of other targets besides a single BCMA target are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2

Non-BCMA-targeted CAR-T clinical trials in multiple myeloma

Trial site/company

Target

No. of patients

Costimulatory domain

Conditioning

Study design

Efficacy

Safety

Registration number/reference

University of Pennsylvania, Novartis

CD19

10

4-1BB

HDM + ASCT

5 × 107 CAR+T cells

ORR, 20% (2 of 10)

Mild CRS

NCT02135406 [41]

Baylor University

Kappa LC

7

CD28

CP or none

1.7 × 107–1.9 × 108 CAR+T cells/m2

4 SD

Mild CRS

NCT00881920 [47]

General Hospital of PLA, China

CD138

5

CD28

PCD, CP, or VAD

22-90 × 107 CAR+T cells

4 SD.

Mild CRS

NCT01886976 [73]

Single-center phase 1 study/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute

NKG2DL

5

Dap10

None

1–30 × 106 CAR+T cells

ORR, 0% (0 of 5)

Mild CRS

NCT02203825 [86]

Abbreviations: BCMA B cell maturation antigen, CAR chimeric antigen receptor, CRS cytokine release syndrome, ASCT autologous stem cell transplantation, HDM high-dose melphalan, CP cyclophosphamide, VAD vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone, PCD pomalidomide-cyclophosphamide-dexamethasone, SD stable disease, ORR overall response rate

Future directions for CAR-T therapy in MM

The efficacy of using CAR-T therapy for MM treatment has been confirmed, and more investigators have turned their attention to optimizing therapeutic protocols. The main areas of focus are concerned with preventing CAR-T-associated side effects and increasing the efficiency of CAR-T therapy. It is well known that CRS and graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) are the most common side effects in CAR-T therapy. IL-6 receptor antagonist, tocilizumab; IL-1 blocker, anakinra; GM-CSF blocker, lenzilumab; and corticosteroids are often used to relieve the toxicity of CRS [87, 88, 89]. Moreover, novel ex vivo culturing of T cells such as T-Rapa cells that can reduce IFN releasing and new CAR structures containing suicide genes like caspase 9 are also currently being developed [90, 91, 92, 93, 94]. GvHD often happens during CAR-T therapy because many scFvs are murine-derived which might elicit a host immune response and limit the efficacy of the treatment. Currently, many CARs incorporating a human scFv have been generated to reduce the potential of immunogenicity [95].

Other remaining issues for further studies include improvement of the efficacy and durability of CAR-T cells and identification of optimal timing for CAR-T cell infusion. Many studies suggest that a combination with PD1 inhibitor may cause CAR-T cells re-expansion and anti-MM activity in the progression of MM patients following CAR-T cell infusion. Apegylated interleukin-10 (IL-10) called pegilodecakin can improve the effect of CAR-T cells in patients alone or in a combination with PD-1 inhibitor [96, 97, 98, 99]. Cohen et al. have also reported that MM patients at an early stage and prior to exposure to multiple lines of therapy may have better outcomes in response to CAR-T therapy [100, 101]. Target selection, structural improvements, and combination therapies will have a priority in the future research of CAR-T therapy in MM.

Conclusion

The development of CAR-T therapy in MM has become an attractive research topic in the past few years. Many studies of CAR-T therapy with different CAR constructs have shown high overall response and tolerable safety profiles in RRMM patients. Many BCMA-targeted CAR-T cell clinical trials have begun to register patients with MM who have failed all available therapies. CAR-T therapies targeting different antigens or in combination with different drugs are under preclinical and clinical studies. Future development and research on increasing the duration of responses, combining CAR-T therapy with different treatment modalities, and reducing potential toxicities will certainly help to further refine the role of CAR-T therapy in the management of MM.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable

Authors’ contributions

CW wrote the initial drafts. LZ, QB, and FZ revised the review. LC revised the review and finalized the last version of the article. All authors checked and approved the final version.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81670199) and Jiangsu Province’s Medical Elite Program (ZDRCA2016015).

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

Not applicable

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Lipe B, Vukas R, Mikhael J. The role of maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood Cancer Journal. 2016;6(10):e485.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Michels TC, Petersen KE. Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2017;95(6):373–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kehrer M, Koob S, Strauss A, Wirtz DC, Schmolders J. Multiple myeloma - current status in diagnostic testing and therapy. Zeitschrift fur Orthopadie und Unfallchirurgie. 2017;155(5):575–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van der Stegen SJ, Hamieh M, Sadelain M. The pharmacology of second-generation chimeric antigen receptors. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015;14(7):499–509.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jensen MC, Riddell SR. Designing chimeric antigen receptors to effectively and safely target tumors. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;33:9–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ali SA, Shi V, Maric I, Wang M, Stroncek DF, Rose JJ, et al. T cells expressing an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128(13):1688–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garfall AL, Maus MV, Hwang WT, Lacey SF, Mahnke YD, Melenhorst JJ, et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T cells against CD19 for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(11):1040–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brudno JN, Maric I, Hartman SD, Rose JJ, Wang M, Lam N, et al. T cells genetically modified to express an anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor cause remissions of poor-prognosis relapsed multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36(22):2267–80.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhao W-H, Liu J, Wang B-Y, Chen Y-X, Cao X-M, Yang Y, et al. A phase 1, open-label study of LCAR-B38M, a chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy directed against B cell maturation antigen, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):141.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Melchor L, Brioli A, Wardell CP, Murison A, Potter NE, Kaiser MF, et al. Single-cell genetic analysis reveals the composition of initiating clones and phylogenetic patterns of branching and parallel evolution in myeloma. Leukemia. 2014;28(8):1705–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hajek R, Okubote SA, Svachova H. Myeloma stem cell concepts, heterogeneity and plasticity of multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2013;163(5):551–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bolli N, Avet-Loiseau H, Wedge DC, Van Loo P, Alexandrov LB, Martincorena I, et al. Heterogeneity of genomic evolution and mutational profiles in multiple myeloma. Nat Commun. 2014;5:2997.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paino T, Paiva B, Sayagues JM, Mota I, Carvalheiro T, Corchete LA, et al. Phenotypic identification of subclones in multiple myeloma with different chemoresistant, cytogenetic and clonogenic potential. Leukemia. 2015;29(5):1186–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tai YT, Anderson KC. Targeting B-cell maturation antigen in multiple myeloma. Immunotherapy. 2015;7(11):1187–99.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tai YT, Acharya C, An G, Moschetta M, Zhong MY, Feng X, et al. APRIL and BCMA promote human multiple myeloma growth and immunosuppression in the bone marrow microenvironment. Blood. 2016;127(25):3225–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee L, Bounds D, Paterson J, Herledan G, Sully K, Seestaller-Wehr LM, et al. Evaluation of B cell maturation antigen as a target for antibody drug conjugate mediated cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Br J Haematol. 2016;174(6):911–22.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sanchez E, Gillespie A, Tang G, Ferros M, Harutyunyan NM, Vardanyan S, et al. Soluble B-cell maturation antigen mediates tumor-induced immune deficiency in multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(13):3383–97.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Topp MS, Duell J, Zugmaier G, Attal M, Moreau P, Langer C, et al. Treatment with AMG 420, an anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) bispecific T-cell engager antibody construct, induces minimal residual disease (MRD) negative complete responses in relapsed and/or refractory (R/R) multiple myeloma (MM) patients: results of a first-in-human (FIH) phase I dose escalation study. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Trudel S, Lendvai N, Popat R, Voorhees PM, Reeves B, Libby EN, et al. Targeting B-cell maturation antigen with GSK2857916 antibody-drug conjugate in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (BMA117159): a dose escalation and expansion phase 1 trial. The Lancet Oncology. 2018;19(12):1641–53.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Raje N, Berdeja J, Lin Y, Siegel D. Anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy bb2121 in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(18):1726–37.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Friedman KM, Garrett TE, Evans JW, Horton HM, Latimer HJ, Seidel SL, et al. Effective targeting of multiple B-cell maturation antigen-expressing hematological malignances by anti-B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Hum Gene Ther. 2018;29(5):585–601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Berdeja JG, Lin Y, Raje N, Munshi N, Siegel D, Liedtke M, et al. Durable clinical responses in heavily pretreated patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: updated results from a multicenter study of bb2121 anti-Bcma CAR T cell therapy. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):740.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Shah N, Alsina M, Siegel DS, Jagannath S, Madduri D, Kaufman JL, et al. Initial results from a phase 1 clinical study of bb21217, a next-generation anti Bcma CAR T therapy. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-116953.
  24. 24.
    Xu J, Chen LJ, Yang SS, Sun Y, Wu W, Liu YF, et al. Exploratory trial of a biepitopic CAR T-targeting B cell maturation antigen in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019;116(19):9543–51.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gregory T, Cohen AD, Costello CL, Ali SA, Berdeja JG, Ostertag EM, et al. Efficacy and safety of P-Bcma-101 CAR-T cells in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-111419.
  26. 26.
    Gregory TK, Berdeja JG, Patel KK, Ali SA, Cohen AD, Costello C, et al. Abstract CT130: clinical trial of P-BCMA-101 T stem cell memory (Tscm) CAR-T cells in relapsed/refractory (r/r) multiple myeloma (MM). Cancer Res. 2018;78(13 Supplement):CT130–CT30.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Mailankody S, Htut M, Lee KP, Bensinger W, Devries T, Piasecki J, et al. JCARH125, anti-BCMA CAR T-cell therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: initial proof of concept results from a phase 1/2 multicenter study (EVOLVE). Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-113548.
  28. 28.
    Jiang S, Jin J, Hao S, Yang M, Chen L, Ruan H, et al. Low dose of human scFv-derived BCMA-targeted CAR-T cells achieved fast response and high complete remission in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):960-60.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mailankody S, Ghosh A, Staehr M, Purdon TJ, Roshal M, Halton E, et al. Clinical responses and pharmacokinetics of MCARH171, a human-derived Bcma targeted CAR T cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: final results of a phase I clinical trial. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):959-59.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Li C, Wang Q, Zhu H, Mao X, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. T cells expressing anti B-cell maturation antigen chimeric antigen receptors for plasma cell malignancies. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Xu J, Wang Q, Xu H, Gu C, Jiang L, Wang J, et al. Anti-BCMA CAR-T cells for treatment of plasma cell dyscrasia: case report on POEMS syndrome and multiple myeloma. J Hematol Oncol. 2018;11(1):128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Li C ZJ, Wang J, Hu G, Du A, Zhou X, Meng L, Hong Z, Chen L, Mao X. Clinical responses and pharmacokinetics of fully human BCMA targeting CAR T-cell therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2019;37:8013-13.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cohen AD, Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Lancaster E, et al. B cell maturation antigen-specific CAR T cells are clinically active in multiple myeloma. J Clin Invest. 2019;129(6):2210–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu Y, Chen Z, Fang H, Wei R, Yu K, Jiang S, et al. Durable remission achieved from Bcma-directed CAR-T Therapy against relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):956-56.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Han L, Gao Q, Zhou K, Yin Q, Fang B, Zhou J, et al. Development and evaluation of CART targeting Bcma with humanized alpaca-derived single-domain antibody as antigen recognition domain. Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):1976-76.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Yan L, Shang J, Kang L, Shi X, Zhou J, Jin S, et al. Combined infusion of CD19 and Bcma-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for RRMM: initial safety and efficacy report from a clinical pilot study. Blood. 2017;130(Suppl 1):506-06.Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Shi X, Yan L, Shang J, Qu S, Kang L, Zhou J, et al. Tandom autologous transplantation and combined infusion of CD19 and Bcma-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cells for high risk MM: initial safety and efficacy report from a clinical pilot study. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-117964.
  38. 38.
    Wang K, Wei G, Liu D. CD19: a biomarker for B cell development, lymphoma diagnosis and therapy. Experimental Hematology & Oncology. 2012;1(1):36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Johnsen HE, Bogsted M, Schmitz A, Bodker JS, El-Galaly TC, Johansen P, et al. The myeloma stem cell concept, revisited: from phenomenology to operational terms. Haematologica. 2016;101(12):1451–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Franqui-Machin R, Wendlandt EB, Janz S, Zhan F, Tricot G. Cancer stem cells are the cause of drug resistance in multiple myeloma: fact or fiction? Oncotarget. 2015;6(38):40496–506.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Garfall AL, Stadtmauer EA, Hwang WT, Lacey SF, Melenhorst JJ, Krevvata M, et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cells with high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation for refractory multiple myeloma. JCI insight. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.120505.
  42. 42.
    Yan Z, Cao J, Cheng H, Qiao J, Zhang H, Wang Y, et al. A combination of humanised anti-CD19 and anti-BCMA CAR T cells in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: a single-arm, phase 2 trial. The Lancet Haematology. 2019;6(10):e521–e29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Schuberth PC, Jakka G, Jensen SM, Wadle A, Gautschi F, Haley D, et al. Effector memory and central memory NY-ESO-1-specific re-directed T cells for treatment of multiple myeloma. Gene Ther. 2013;20(4):386–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Rapoport AP, Stadtmauer EA, Binder-Scholl GK, Goloubeva O, Vogl DT, Lacey SF, et al. NY-ESO-1-specific TCR-engineered T cells mediate sustained antigen-specific antitumor effects in myeloma. Nat Med. 2015;21(8):914–21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Stadtmauer EA, Faitg TH, Lowther DE, Badros AZ. Long-term safety and activity of NY-ESO-1 SPEAR T cells after autologous stem cell transplant for myeloma. Blood Advances. 2019;3(13):2022–34.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mastaglio S, Genovese P, Magnani Z, Ruggiero E, Landoni E, Camisa B, et al. NY-ESO-1 TCR single edited stem and central memory T cells to treat multiple myeloma without graft-versus-host disease. Blood. 2017;130(5):606–18.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ramos CA, Savoldo B, Torrano V, Ballard B, Zhang H, Dakhova O, et al. Clinical responses with T lymphocytes targeting malignancy-associated kappa light chains. J Clin Invest. 2016;126(7):2588–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Hutchinson AT, Jones DR, Raison RL. Preclinical and clinical development of an anti-kappa free light chain mAb for multiple myeloma. Mol Immunol. 2015;67(2 Pt A):89–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Liebisch P, Eppinger S, Schopflin C, Stehle G, Munzert G, Dohner H, et al. CD44v6, a target for novel antibody treatment approaches, is frequently expressed in multiple myeloma and associated with deletion of chromosome arm 13q. Haematologica. 2005;90(4):489–93.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Tijink BM, Buter J, de Bree R, Giaccone G, Lang MS, Staab A, et al. A phase I dose escalation study with anti-CD44v6 bivatuzumab mertansine in patients with incurable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12(20 Pt 1):6064–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Casucci M, Nicolis di Robilant B, Falcone L, Camisa B, Norelli M, Genovese P, et al. CD44v6-targeted T cells mediate potent antitumor effects against acute myeloid leukemia and multiple myeloma. Blood. 2013;122(20):3461–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Van Camp B, Durie BG, Spier C, De Waele M, Van Riet I, Vela E, et al. Plasma cells in multiple myeloma express a natural killer cell-associated antigen: CD56 (NKH-1; Leu-19). Blood. 1990;76(2):377–82.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Tassone P, Gozzini A, Goldmacher V, Shammas MA, Whiteman KR, Carrasco DR, et al. In vitro and in vivo activity of the maytansinoid immunoconjugate huN901-N2′-deacetyl-N2′-(3-mercapto-1-oxopropyl)-maytansine against CD56+ multiple myeloma cells. Cancer Res. 2004;64(13):4629–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Berdeja JG. Lorvotuzumab mertansine: antibody-drug-conjugate for CD56+ multiple myeloma. Front Biosci (Landmark edition). 2014;19:163-170.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Benjamin R CM, Gunset G, Sadelain M. . CD56 targeted chimeric antigen receptors for immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Supplement):3499-99.Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    McEarchern JA, Smith LM, McDonagh CF, Klussman K, Gordon KA, Morris-Tilden CA, et al. Preclinical characterization of SGN-70, a humanized antibody directed against CD70. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(23):7763–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Tannir NM, Forero-Torres A, Ramchandren R, Pal SK, Ansell SM, Infante JR, et al. Phase I dose-escalation study of SGN-75 in patients with CD70-positive relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma or metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Investig New Drugs. 2014;32(6):1246–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Owonikoko TK, Hussain A, Stadler WM, Smith DC, Kluger H, Molina AM, et al. First-in-human multicenter phase I study of BMS-936561 (MDX-1203), an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD70. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;77(1):155–62.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Wang QJ, Yu Z, Hanada KI, Patel K, Kleiner D, Restifo NP, et al. Preclinical evaluation of chimeric antigen receptors targeting CD70-expressing cancers. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(9):2267–76.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Ge H, Mu L, Jin L, Yang C, Chang YE, Long Y, et al. Tumor associated CD70 expression is involved in promoting tumor migration and macrophage infiltration in GBM. Int J Cancer. 2017;141(7):1434–44.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jin L, Ge H, Long Y, Yang C, Chang YE, Mu L, et al. CD70, a novel target of CAR T-cell therapy for gliomas. Neuro-oncology. 2018;20(1):55–65.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Fernandez JE, Deaglio S, Donati D, Beusan IS, Corno F, Aranega A, et al. Analysis of the distribution of human CD38 and of its ligand CD31 in normal tissues. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 1998;12(3):81–91.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    de Weers M, Tai YT, van der Veer MS, Bakker JM, Vink T, Jacobs DC, et al. Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J Immunol (Baltimore, MD: 1950). 2011;186(3):1840-1848.Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Lonial S, Weiss BM, Usmani SZ, Singhal S, Chari A, Bahlis NJ, et al. Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with treatment-refractory multiple myeloma (SIRIUS): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet (London, England). 2016;387(10027):1551-1560.Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Martin T, Baz R, Benson DM, Lendvai N, Wolf J, Munster P, et al. A phase 1b study of isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2017;129(25):3294–303.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Drent E, Themeli M, Poels R, de Jong-Korlaar R, Yuan H, de Bruijn J, et al. A rational strategy for reducing on-target off-tumor effects of CD38-chimeric antigen receptors by affinity optimization. Mol Ther. 2017;25(8):1946–58.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Drent E, Groen RW, Noort WA, Themeli M, Lammerts van Bueren JJ, Parren PW, et al. Pre-clinical evaluation of CD38 chimeric antigen receptor engineered T cells for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Haematologica. 2016;101(5):616–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sanderson RD, Turnbull JE, Gallagher JT, Lander AD. Fine structure of heparan sulfate regulates syndecan-1 function and cell behavior. J Biol Chem. 1994;269(18):13100–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Wijdenes J, Vooijs WC, Clement C, Post J, Morard F, Vita N, et al. A plasmocyte selective monoclonal antibody (B-B4) recognizes syndecan-1. Br J Haematol. 1996;94(2):318–23.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Kambham N, Kong C, Longacre TA, Natkunam Y. Utility of syndecan-1 (CD138) expression in the diagnosis of undifferentiated malignant neoplasms: a tissue microarray study of 1,754 cases. Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology: AIMM. 2005;13(4):304–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Jagannath S, Chanan-Khan A, Heffner LT, Avigan D, Zimmerman TM, Lonial S, et al. BT062, An antibody-drug conjugate directed against CD138, shows clinical activity in patients with relapsed or relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2011;118(21):305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kelly KR, Siegel DS, Chanan-Khan AA, Somlo G, Heffner LT, Jagannath S, et al. Indatuximab ravtansine (BT062) in combination with low-dose dexamethasone and lenalidomide or pomalidomide: clinical activity in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128(22):4486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Bo G, Mei Xia C, Qing Wang H, Hui F, Han Ren D, Wen Ying Z, et al. CD138-directed adoptive immunotherapy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells for multiple myeloma. Journal of Cellular Immunotherapy. 2016;2(1):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Jung O, Trapp-Stamborski V, Purushothaman A, Jin H, Wang H, Sanderson RD, et al. Heparanase-induced shedding of syndecan-1/CD138 in myeloma and endothelial cells activates VEGFR2 and an invasive phenotype: prevention by novel synstatins. Oncogenesis. 2016;5:e202.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Hsi ED, Steinle R, Balasa B, Szmania S, Draksharapu A, Shum BP, et al. CS1, a potential new therapeutic antibody target for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14(9):2775–84.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chu J, He S, Deng Y, Zhang J, Peng Y, Hughes T, et al. Genetic modification of T cells redirected toward CS1 enhances eradication of myeloma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2014;20(15):3989–4000.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Gogishvili T, Danhof S, Prommersberger S, Rydzek J, Schreder M, Brede C, et al. SLAMF7-CAR T-cells eliminate myeloma and confer selective fratricide of SLAMF7+ normal lymphocytes. Blood. 2017;130(26):2838–47.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Veillette A, Guo H. CS1, a SLAM family receptor involved in immune regulation, is a therapeutic target in multiple myeloma. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2013;88(1):168–77.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Friend R, Bhutani M, Voorhees PM, Usmani SZ. Clinical potential of SLAMF7 antibodies - focus on elotuzumab in multiple myeloma. Drug Design, Development and Therapy. 2017;11:893–900.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mathur R, Zhang Z, He J, Galetto R, Gouble A, Chion-Sotinel I, et al. Abstract PR01: targeting multiple myeloma with universal SLAMF7-specific CAR T-cells. Cancer Immunology Research.  https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.
  81. 81.
    Brauner-Osborne H, Jensen AA, Sheppard PO, Brodin B, Krogsgaard-Larsen P, O’Hara P. Cloning and characterization of a human orphan family C G-protein coupled receptor GPRC5D. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001;1518(3):237–48.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Cohen Y, Gutwein O, Garach-Jehoshua O, Bar-Haim A, Kornberg A. GPRC5D is a promising marker for monitoring the tumor load and to target multiple myeloma cells. Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 2013;18(6):348-351.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Bam R, Li X, Khan S, Ling W, Randal SS, Yaccoby S. GPRC5D Is a cell surface plasma cell marker whose expression is high in myeloma cells and reduced following coculture with osteoclasts. Blood. 2013;122(21):3099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Frigyesi I, Adolfsson J, Ali M, Kronborg Christophersen M, Johnsson E, Turesson I, et al. Robust isolation of malignant plasma cells in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2014;123(9):1336–40.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Smith EL, Harrington K, Staehr M, Masakayan R, Jones J, Long T, et al. CAR T cell therapy targeting G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D), a novel target for the immunotherapy of multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-110471.
  86. 86.
    Baumeister SH, Murad J, Werner L, Daley H, Trebeden-Negre H, Gicobi JK, et al. Phase I trial of autologous CAR T cells targeting NKG2D ligands in patients with AML/MDS and multiple myeloma. Cancer Immunology Research. 2019;7(1):100–12.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Giavridis T, van der Stegen SJC, Eyquem J, Hamieh M, Piersigilli A, Sadelain M. CAR T cell–induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat Med. 2018;24(6):731–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Davila ML, Riviere I, Wang X, Bartido S, Park J, Curran K, et al. Efficacy and toxicity management of 19-28z CAR T cell therapy in B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6(224):224ra25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Sterner RM, Sakemura R, Yang N, Cox MJ, Khadka RH, Forsman CL, et al. GM-CSF blockade during chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy reduces cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity and may enhance their effector functions. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-111766.
  90. 90.
    Pule MA, Straathof KC, Dotti G, Heslop HE, Rooney CM, Brenner MK. A chimeric T cell antigen receptor that augments cytokine release and supports clonal expansion of primary human T cells. Mol Ther. 2005;12(5):933–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Straathof KC, Pule MA, Yotnda P, Dotti G, Vanin EF, Brenner MK, et al. An inducible caspase 9 safety switch for T-cell therapy. Blood. 2005;105(11):4247–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Oldham RAA, Felizardo T, Zhu N, Fowler DH, Medin JA. CAR-modified Th1/Tc1-polarized T-Rapa cells dissociate inflammatory cytokine secretion from anti-tumor cytotoxicity. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-113642.
  93. 93.
    Rajavel S, Ito CE, Abe K, Guerrero V, Uenishi GI, Scharenberg AM, et al. Chemically controlled, immunosuppression-resistant, anti-Bcma CAR-T cells for treatment of antibody-mediated autoimmunity. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-117630.
  94. 94.
    Mestermann K, Rydzek J, Silke F, Nerreter T, Andreas M, Einsele H, et al. A novel pharmacologic ‘remote control’ to steer CAR-T cell function in vivo. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-118626.
  95. 95.
    Smith EL, Staehr M, Masakayan R, Tatake IJ, Purdon TJ, Wang X, et al. Development and evaluation of an optimal human single-chain variable fragment-derived BCMA-targeted CAR T cell vector. Mol Ther. 2018;26(6):1447–56.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Chong EA, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Ambrose DE, Gonzalez V, Levine BL, et al. PD-1 blockade modulates chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T cells: refueling the CAR. Blood. 2017;129(8):1039–41.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Bernabei L, Garfall AL, Melenhorst JJ, Lacey SF, Stadtmauer EA, Vogl DT, et al. PD-1 inhibitor combinations as salvage therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) patients progressing after Bcma-directed CAR T cells. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-119514.
  98. 98.
    Pearl J, Urnov FD, Stamatoyannopoulos JA. Potent and timed epigenetic repression of PD-1 in human T cells. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-119011.
  99. 99.
    McCauley S, Verma R, Oft M. Pegilodecakin, a Pegylated human IL-10 (AM0010), enhances the cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells in vitro and in vivo. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-119359.
  100. 100.
    Cohen AD, Melenhorst JJ, Garfall AL, Lacey SF, Davis M, Vogl DT, et al. Predictors of T cell expansion and clinical responses following B-cell maturation antigen-specific chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CART-BCMA) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). Blood. 2018;132(Suppl 1):1974-74.Google Scholar
  101. 101.
    Dancy E, Garfall AL, Cohen AD, Fraietta JA, Davis M, Levine BL, et al. Clinical predictors of T cell fitness for CAR T cell manufacturing and efficacy in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-99-115319.

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical UniversityJiangsu Province HospitalNanjingChina
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation and Holden Comprehensive Cancer CenterUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA
  3. 3.Molecular Medicine ProgramUniversity of IowaIowa CityUSA

Personalised recommendations