Advertisement

Neurological complications after cardiac surgery: a retrospective case-control study of risk factors and outcome

  • Giuseppe Maria RaffaEmail author
  • Francesco Agnello
  • Giovanna Occhipinti
  • Roberto Miraglia
  • Vincenzina Lo Re
  • Gianluca Marrone
  • Fabio Tuzzolino
  • Antonio Arcadipane
  • Michele Pilato
  • Angelo Luca
Open Access
Research article
  • 428 Downloads

Abstract

Background

To evaluate incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of postoperative neurological complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Methods

A total of 2121 patients underwent cardiac surgery between August, 2008 and December, 2013; 91/2121 (4.3%) underwent brain computed tomography (70/91, 77%) or magnetic resonance imaging (21/91, 23%) scan because of major stroke (37/2121, 1.7%) and a spectrum of transient neurological episodes as well as transient ischemic attacks and delirium /psychosis/seizures (54/2121, 2.5%). The mean age was 65.3 ± 12.1 years and 60 (65.9%) were male. Variables were compared among study- and matched-patients (n = 113) without neurological deficits.

Results

A total of 37/2121 (1.7%) patients had imaging evidence of stroke. Radiological examinations were done 5.72 ± 3.6 days after surgery. Patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke had longer intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) (13.8 ± 14.7 and 12.9 ± 15 days vs. 5.7 ± 12.1 days, respectively (p < 0.001) and hospital LOS (53 ± 72.8 and 35.5 ± 29.8 days vs. 18.4 ± 29.2 days, respectively (p < 0.001) than the control group. The hospital mortality of patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke was higher than the control group (7/37 patients [19%], and 12/54 patients [22%] vs. 4/115 patients [3%], respectively (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis of any grade (p < .001), and re-do operations (p = .013) increased the risk of postoperative neurological complications.

Conclusions

Neurological complications after cardiac surgery increase hospitalization and mortality even in patients without radiologic evidence of stroke. Bilateral internal carotid artery stenosis of any grade, suggesting a diffuse patient propensity toward atherosclerosis, and re-do operations increase the risk of postoperative neurological complications.

Keywords

Atherosclerosis Carotid arteries CT-scan MRI Neurocognitive deficits Cardiac surgery 

Abbreviation

CABG

coronary artery bypass graft

CPB

cardiopulmonary bypass

CT

computed tomography

ICA

internal carotid artery

ICU-LOS

intensive care unit length of stay

MRI

magnetic resonance imaging

PSV

peak systolic velocity

US

ultrasound

Background

Postoperative neurological impairment after cardiac surgery is a serious complication [1, 2, 3]. Clinical manifestations are various, and include cognitive-behavioral disturbances, altered states of consciousness, and focal neurological deficits [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]. Neurocognitive impairment occurs in 15–66% of patients at discharge, and in up to 40% of patients at 5 years after surgery [9, 10]. Symptomatic stroke occurs in 1.2 to 6% of patients, and its incidence is higher in the elderly [11, 12, 13, 14]. Several studies have evaluated postoperative neurologic complications and risk factors in cardiac surgery patients, though the results are conflicting, or incomplete mainly due to a low number of interventions or a low number of variables. Some studies have reported the association between prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass and the development of postoperative stroke [11, 14], while others have questioned its significance [11, 13]. Few studies have evaluated the incidence of postoperative neurological complications in a large group of patients who have undergone a variety of cardiac procedures [10, 12, 14].

Therefore, the purpose of our study was to identify the incidence of neurological complications and their risk factors in patients who underwent cardiac surgery at our institute.

Methods

Study design

This retrospective study was carried out in a major referral hospital for cardiovascular diseases [8, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]. Our Institutional Research Review Board approved this study, with a waiver of informed consent. Between August, 2008 and December, 2013, 2121 patients underwent cardiac operations at our institute. Among them, 91/2121 (4.3%) patients, with no history of previous cerebrovascular events, suffered postoperative neurological complications and underwent either computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain imaging. Postoperative neurologic complications were defined as any newly developed central neurological deficit occurring before the discharge of the patient. The severity of neurological complications was classified into major strokes (associated with permanent major disabilities and evident lesion on neurological imaging) and transient ischemic attacks and delirium/psychosis/convulsion (reversible neurological symptoms with no significant lesions on neurological imaging). A further classification according to the size of neurological injury detected on CT or MRI was made (see brain imaging protocol and analysis section). A control group was matched in order to identify predictors of neurological complications. The control group was composed of 113 cardiac surgery patients without neurological complications selected according to age, gender, and type of intervention. For each patient, intensive care unit length of stay (ICU-LOS) and overall hospital LOS were recorded.

Surgical procedures

Surgical procedures were performed by four faculty level cardiovascular surgeons. Surgery consisted of 1) coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) (n = 54); 2) valve operations (n = 40) [15, 17]; 3) complex procedures (CABG and aortic surgery, combined aortic, mitral, tricuspid valve surgery, heart transplantation [16], left ventricle assist device [18], left ventricular aneurysmectomy, repair of post-infarction ventricular septal defect) (n = 44); 4) aortic procedures (n = 49) [19]; and 5) re-do operations (n = 17). Details are listed in Table 1. Classification was made according to the different thromboembolic risks, de-airing issues, and brain protection strategies.
Table 1

Patient characteristics and analysis of continuous (mean and ranges) and categorical variables (%)

Variable

Study group (n = 91)

Matched patients (n = 113)

P value

Preoperative characteristics

Age (years)

65.4 (25–68)

65.4 (29–84)

0.99

Gender (M)

60 (65%)

73 (64%)

0.13

Height (cm)

163 (147–184)

163 (143–192)

0.64

Weight (kg)

72.31 (48.8–114)

74 (44.2–135.5)

0.39

BMI

27.07 (17.5–41.7)

27.5 (16–43.06)

0.52

BSA

1.8 (1.43–2.32)

1.82 (1.35–2.58)

0.35

Diabetes

32 (35%)

31 (27%)

0.36

Hypertension

66 (72%)

85 (75%)

0.64

Dyslipidemia

34 (37%)

45 (40%)

0.66

Chronic Renal Failure

10 (11%)

12 (10%)

1

Smoking

  

0.94

 Nonsmoker

49 (54%)

55 (49%)

 

 Current smoker

15 (16%)

25 (22%)

 

 Former smoker

27 (30%)

33 (29%)

 

Family history of stroke

19 (21%)

29 (26%)

0.52

Bilateral ICA stenosis < 50%

52 (57%)

9 (8%)

<.001

Bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade

63 (69%)

17 (15%)

<.001

Surgical Procedure

CABG

25/91 (27%)

29/113 (26%)

0.77

Valve operations

14/91 (15%)

26/113 (23%)

0.17

Aortic valve repair/replacement

5

12

 

 Mitral valve repair/replacement

9

14

 

 Complex procedures

16/91 (18%)

28/113 (24%)

0.21

CABG + Aortic surgery

4

7

 

 Combined aortic, mitral and tricuspid valve

4

9

 

 Heart transplantation

3

7

 

 LVAD

3

3

 

 Left ventricular aneurysmectomy

1

1

 

 Repair of post-infarction VSD

1

1

 

 Aortic procedures

24/91 (27%)

25/113 (22%)

0.48

Ascending aorta surgery

5

7

 

 Aortic arch surgery

2

5

 

 Combined procedure

10

7

 

 Aortic root surgery

3

3

 

 Valve operation + Aortic procedure

3

1

 

 CABG + Aortic procedure

1

2

 

 Re-do Operation

12/91 (13%)

5/113 (5%)

0.02

Surgical Details

CBP time (minutes)

111.11 (0–257)

99.12 (0–257)

0.10

Aortic clamp time (minutes)

77.67 (0–216)

71.47 (0–197)

0.28

Hypothermic circulatory arrest

25 (27%)

17 (15%)

0.02

On-pump CABG with beating heart

7 (7%)

3 (3%)

0.10

Off-pump CABG

4 (4%)

6 (5%)

0.2

Number of distal anastomoses (from 1 to 5)

40 (44%)

44 (39%)

0.3

Intraoperative hemofiltration

3 (3%)

2 (2%)

0.07

Complicated weaning from CPB

12 (13%)

5 (4%)

0.02

Cardioplegia delivery

 Anterograde

70 (77%)

86 (76%)

0.12

 None

11 (12%)

9 (8%)

 Anterograde+selective

7 (8%)

12 (11%)

Anterograde+ retrograde

3 (3%)

6 (5%)

Cardioplegia carrier

 Crystalloid

8 (10%)

3 (3%)

0.02

 Blood

72 (90%)

110 (97%)

Cardiac rhythm at sternal closure

 Sinus

37 (41%)

61 (54%)

0.04

 Non sinus (AF, AVB, PM)

54 (59%)

52 (46%)

 Defibrillation required at weaning

23 (25%)

23 (20%)

0.31

 Surgery time (minutes)

152.24 (21–368)

132.08 (35–660)

0.07

Intra-aortic balloon pump

9 (10%)

9 (8%)

0.62

Post-operative data

Severe hypotension

20 (22%)

25 (22%)

0.86

Need for vasoactive drugs

55 (60%)

54 (48%)

0.03

Transfusion of red blood cells (units)

2 (2–15)

1.6 (0–22)

0.26

Transfusion of plasma (units)

1.75 (0–18)

1.34 (0–27)

0.32

Transfusion of platelets (units)

3.1 (0–22)

2.34 (0–20)

0.21

BMI body mass index, BSA body surface area, ICA internal carotid artery, CABG coronary artery bypass graft, LVAD left ventricle assist device, VSD ventricular septal defect, CPB cardiopulmonary bypass, AF atrial fibrillation, AVB atrio-ventricular block, PM pacemaker

Risk factors

Clinical and surgical charts were reviewed in order to identify risk factors associated with postoperative stroke. Preoperative variables included degree of internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis on color Doppler ultrasound (US); height; weight; body mass index; body surface index; arterial hypertension; diabetes; dyslipidemia; chronic renal failure (creatinine > 1.8 mg/dl); and smoking status (nonsmoker, current smoker, or former smoker). Operative variables included use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB); cardiac rhythm at sternal closure; surgery time; need for intra-aortic balloon pump; number of anastomoses; complicated weaning from CPB; need for vasoactive drugs; severe hypotension (mean arterial pressure < 50 mmHg) during surgery; and transfusion of packed red blood cells, platelets, or fresh frozen plasma. When cardiopulmonary bypass was used, cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic clamp time, hypothermic circulatory arrest of any grade ranging from 24 °C to 28 °C, cardioplegia delivery (anterograde or retrograde), and carrier (crystalloid or blood), and intraoperative hemofiltration were recorded.

ICA Doppler US and analysis

ICA Doppler US was done as part of preoperative imaging work-up within three months before cardiac surgery. Doppler US was done by experienced radiologists using Logiq7 or Logiq9 technology (GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, USA) and a 9 MHz sound linear transducer. Doppler images were retrospectively reviewed, and the degree of ICA stenosis was classified according to the Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference criteria [20]. ICA stenosis was graded as absent (peak Systolic Velocity (PSV) less than 125 cm/sec and no visible plaque or intima-media thickness) or present with < 50% stenosis (PSV less than 125 cm/sec and visible plaque or intimal thickening); 50–69% stenosis (PSV equal to 125–230 cm/sec and visible plaque); 70% stenosis to near occlusion (PSV greater than 230 cm/sec and visible plaque and luminal narrowing); near occlusion (evidence of a markedly narrowed lumen on color Doppler US and not applicable velocity parameters); and total occlusion (no sonographically detectable patent lumen and no flow on color Doppler US) (Table 2). ICA stenosis side was also classified as right, left, or bilateral.
Table 2

Internal carotid artery ultrasound findings

ICA

Population

Normal

< 50%

 

50–70%

> 70% to near occlusion

Occlusion

Right

Study (n = 91)

14 (15.4%)

70 (77%)

 

3 (3.3%)

3 (3.3%)

1 (1%)

 

Matched (n = 113)

90 (79.7%)

17 (15%)

 

2 (1.8%)

3 (2.6%)

1 (0.9%)

Left

Study (n = 91)

15 (16.5%)

72 (79.2%)

 

3 (3.3%)

1 (1%)

 

Matched (n = 113)

95 (84%)

16 (14.2%)

 

1 (0.9%)

1 (0.9%)

 

ICA Internal carotid artery

Brain imaging protocol and analysis

MRI was done on a 1.5 Tesla scan (Signa HDXT, GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, USA). MRI protocol included an axial T2-weighted fluid attenuation inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence; an axial T2-weighted fast spin echo sequence; an axial T2-weighted gradient echo sequence; an axial diffusion-weighted sequence using b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2; a sagittal T1-weighted spin echo sequence; a three-dimensional T1-weighted spoiled gradient echo sequence (contrast dye was not routinely used). CT was done on a 64-section CT scan (VCT 64; GE Medical Systems, Milwaukee, Wis) and, again, contrast dye was not routinely used. Patients with stroke underwent emergent CT or MRI as soon as symptoms occurred and the diagnostic tool used were repeated 24 h after symptoms or whenever clinical changes occurred. In patients received brain CT scan, the 24 h re-evaluation allowed the detection of the vascular territory involved corresponding to the clinical neurological features. Brain images were independently evaluated by two experienced radiologists. Both readers were blinded to clinical information. Diagnosis of stroke was made using previously published criteria [21, 22]. Strokes were classified into ischemic and hemorrhagic. Ischemic strokes were further classified into the following categories: 1) small stroke; 2) not small stroke; 3) coexisting small and not small strokes. Small strokes were less than 5 mm in diameter. Not small strokes included strokes greater than 5 mm in diameter. Stroke arterial distribution and number were recorded.

Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and qualitative variables as absolute and relative frequencies. Quantitative variables were compared using the paired t-test, the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test, or analysis of variance (ANOVA) when were appropriate. Qualitative variables were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Preoperative and operative variables were compared among patients with neurological complications (study group) and those without (control group). ICA stenosis was further classified as bilateral and not bilateral. Bilateral ICA stenosis included ICA stenosis of any degree. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independence of the risk factors of neurological complications. The multiple logistic regression model included variables with p values ≤0.2 from univariate analysis adjusted by type of intervention. A significance level of 0.2 was used to remove variables from the model by stepwise selection.

Outcome analysis evaluated the ICU-LOS, the overall hospital LOS and the hospital mortality. Outcome variables were compared among neurological patients with imaging evidence of stroke and control group patients, among neurologic patients without imaging evidence of stroke and control group patients, and among neurological patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis were done with STATA, version 13.1software (StataCorp LP, College Station, Texas, USA).

Results

Patient characteristics

Among the 91 study group, 37/2121 (1.7%) had major strokes and 54/2121 (2.5%) had transient ischemic attacks (including delirium/psychosis/convulsion). The mean age was 65.3 ± 12.1 years, and 60 (65.9%) were male.

Imaging findings

Radiological examinations were done 5.72 ± 3.6 days after surgery. Brain imaging was performed using CT in 70/91 (77%) and MRI in 21/91 (23%) patients. Thirty-seven/91 (41%) patients had imaging evidence of stroke and 35/37 (94%) had ischemic etiology (25/35 were not-small strokes, 6/35 were small strokes; and 4/35 were both small and not small strokes, respectively) (Fig. 1, a-c). Ischemic stroke was single in 21/35 (60%) patients and multiple in 14/35 (40%) patients. Ischemic strokes were located as follows: middle cerebral artery territory in 10/35 (28%) patients; posterior cerebral artery territory in 15/35 (43%) patients; posterior inferior cerebellar artery territory in 1/35 (3%); and more than 1 arterial territory in 9/35 (26%) patients. Two/37 (6%) patients had hemorrhagic strokes. All hemorrhagic strokes (2/37, 6%) were single, and were located in the left middle cerebral artery territory, in the area of the deep perforating lenticulostriate arteries.
Fig. 1

a Axial DWI obtained in a 69-year-old man two days after cardiac surgery shows multiple small (arrow) and not small (*) ischemic strokes in both hemispheres. The patient had bilateral < 50% internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. Absence of significant ICA stenosis and bilateral distribution suggest an embolic origin of the strokes. b Axial DWI obtained in a 72 year-old woman two days after cardiac surgery shows a small hyperintense area (arrow) in the right posterior cerebral artery territory, consistent with small ischemic stroke. The patient had bilateral < 50% ICA stenosis. c Axial DWI obtained in a 69-year-old man three days after cardiac surgery shows a large, hyperintense area in the left middle cerebral artery territory, consistent with not small ischemic stroke. The patient had bilateral < 50% ICA stenosis

Risk factors

Univariate analysis showed that bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade, hypothermic circulatory arrest, crystalloid cardioplegia, lack of sinus rhythm at sternal closure, difficult weaning from CPB, and vasoactive drugs were associated with postoperative neurological complications. Other preoperative and operative variables were not statistically different among groups. Details are shown in Table 1.

Variables in the multivariate analysis included bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade; off-pump CABG; on-pump CABG with beating heart; hypothermic circulatory arrest; complicated weaning from CPB; use of crystalloid cardioplegia; vasoactive drugs; and type of surgery. Multivariate analysis showed that bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade (odds ratio: 73.84; 95% confidence interval, 21.87–249.29; p < .001), and re-do operations (odds ratio: 7.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.58–51.24; p = .013) increased the risk of neurological complications.

Outcomes

Patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke had longer ICU-LOS (13.8 ± 14.7 and 12.9 ± 15 days vs. 5.7 ± 12.1 days, respectively (p < 0. 001) and hospital LOS (53 ± 72.8 and 35.5 ± 29.8 days vs. 18.4 ± 29.2 days, respectively (p < 0.001) than the control group. The hospital mortality of patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke was higher than the control group (7/37 patients [19%] and 12/54 patients (22%) vs. 4/115 patients (3%), respectively (p < 0.001) (Fig. 2a, b). However, Kaplan Meier analysis showed no statistically significant difference in temporal occurrence of hospital mortality among the study group and control group (p = 0.2977) (Fig. 3). There was no statistically significant difference in outcome variables between neurological patients with imaging evidence of stroke and those without (Fig. 2 a, b).
Fig. 2

Box-and-whisker plot of intensive care unit length of stay (LOS) (a, *p < .001 compared with control group, #p = .065 compared with neurological patients with imaging evidence of stroke) and hospital LOS (b, *p < .001 compared with control group. #p = .073 compared with neurological patients with imaging evidence of stroke). Horizontal line indicates median. Upper and lower margins of the box indicate 75th and 25th percentile of values, respectively. Whiskers indicate ranges

Fig. 3

Kaplan Meyer Curve for hospital mortality in control group and study group

Discussion

In this study we evaluated the incidence of postoperative neurological complications in 2121 consecutive cardiac surgery patients, and found that 4.3% patients had neurological deficits. Thirty-seven/2121 (1.7%) patients had imaging evidence of stroke, and up to 71% showed not-small ischemic strokes. The occurrence of postoperative neurological complications increased hospitalization and hospital mortality. Therefore, it is crucial to identify potential risk factors to prevent postoperative neurological complications. The etiology of postoperative stroke in cardiac surgery patients is multifactorial, with embolism as the predominant cause, while intraoperative hypotension and hemorrhage are less frequent [23]. Embolism is attributed mainly to manipulation of the atherosclerotic aorta, release of gaseous or particulate matter from the cardiopulmonary bypass pump, postoperative atrial fibrillation and minimally invasive procedures [2, 3, 23, 24, 25]. Independent risk factors on multivariate analysis associated with neurologic damage were bilateral ICA stenosis and re-do operations.

Bilateral ICA stenosis

Bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade was the most important risk factor, with an odds ratio of 73.84. Studies have evaluated the relationship between stroke after cardiac surgery and carotid stenosis [26, 27] that includes two major mechanisms: artery to artery (thrombosis from proximal segment to distal segment) or hypoperfusion (causing border zone infarcts - watershed infarction). Hirotani et al. [26] analyzed 476 patients undergoing CABG, and reported the severity of carotid stenosis as the only independent risk factor of postoperative stroke. To the best of our knowledge, no studies correlate ICA stenosis regardless of degree and neurologic damage. In our series, 69% of patients with neurological complications had bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade, even less than 50% (Tables 1 and 2), while 85% of patients without neurological complications had normal ICAs (Tables 1 and 2). We hypothesized that, regardless of the degree, ICA stenosis may be a marker of systemic atherosclerosis. Indeed, the relationship between the calcifications of the aortic arch and the coronary artery disease has been evaluated [28]. In asymptomatic patients, the carotid intima media thickness [29, 30], and not the severity of carotid stenosis [31], may estimate the risks of stroke and ischemic coronary events. Bilateral ICA stenosis is an important finding, and suggests diffuse atherosclerosis damage [32] in fact, the size and location of brain lesions in our series suggest an embolic mechanism from manipulation of ascending aortic and aortic arch [28]. It can also identify patients who may benefit from other diagnostic tests (e.g., chest CT scan without contrast dye) to detect any ascending aorta calcifications and dangerous source of embolic debridement [28, 33, 34, 35, 36].

The optimal staged or combined management of patients requiring carotid endarterectomy and cardiac surgery is a matter of debate [37]. Our strategy includes the treatment of unilateral critical stenosis in symptomatic patients, and bilateral stenosis with a unilateral complete occlusion in the asymptomatic one before cardiac operations. Either percutaneous or surgical treatment is decided on an individual basis.

Re-do operations

Our study also identifies re-do operations as an independent risk factor for postoperative neurological complications. Re-do operations are more technically demanding than first-time operations. Difficulties are related to sternal re-entry, pericardial adhesions, and management of atherosclerotic vein grafts [7, 38, 39, 40]. Moreover, reoperation on aortic and mitral valve carries a high risk of calcium, thrombus, muscle fragments, and valve prosthesis debris embolization [41].

In our study, more than 50% of neurological patients had no stroke (either ischemic or hemorrhagic) imaging findings, and this can in part be explained by our study limitations. Neurological complications can be detect using either CT or MRI. CT and MRI are modalities that can be used with confidence, both having their strengths and weaknesses. The choice is based mostly on the available infrastructure and staff. CT is the imaging available in most hospitals. The recent technical advancements in CT and its speed confer additional advantages to this technique. Radiation exposure remains a relevant issue in stroke CT. MRI can provide additional information and is more sensitive to small ischemic lesions, on the other hand CT is more widely available. Some institutions have MRI available at all times and prefer it over CT for many patients due to the additional information it provides and more sensitivity. Unenhanced brain CT scan has been shown to be relatively non-sensitive in detecting acute and small strokes [42]. MRI is not feasible in all patients because of the presence of metallic implants or pacemakers. However, both CT scan and MRI showed appropriate sensitivity in detecting any brain lesions whenever clinical major strokes occurred.

Similar to neurological patients with imaging evidence of stroke, patients without had longer hospitalization and higher hospital mortality compared with the control group. However, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome among patients with and without imaging evidence of stroke. These observations suggest that the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications worsened the postoperative outcome independent of the evidence of stroke on imaging, and this may be related to both the clinical impairment and the occurrence of further postoperative complications.

Limitations

First, our study was retrospective and therefore not all patients underwent MRI. Although possibly related to different causes, patients with delirium/psychosis/convulsion and transient ischemic attacks were grouped according to the reversibility of the neurological damage. Patient characteristics before and after matching are missing. Selection of patients was limited to those who had postoperative brain imaging within 15 days; this type of inclusion may induce substantial bias, and also is limited in that there is no good evidence regarding numbers of patients imaged at other institutions for stroke. Second, no follow-up data were available because our protocol requires only one visit, 30 days after discharge. Several variables, including the type of stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic), the detailed degree of ICA stenosis, use of statins and other medications, the operator, and the length of surgery were not modeled in the analysis. Finally, the study of intracranial arterial system and cerebrovascular tree both at MRI and CT was not performed missing further information of possible causes of stroke.

Conclusion

This study showed that the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications increases hospitalization and hospital mortality. Among the preoperative and operative variables analyzed, only bilateral ICA stenosis of any grade and re-do operations increased the risk of postoperative neurological complications. Preoperative ICA ultrasound is useful in identifying patients at higher risk of postoperative neurological complications.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

For the research reported here, no funding has to be declared. No influence on the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript.

Availability of data and materials

Please contact author for data access.

Declaration

All authors gave their consent to publish the article. The data evaluated for our study are available.

Authors’ contributions

FA, GMR: conception and design of the research, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data; drafting of the manuscript. RM: critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content. GO, VLR, MCT, GM.: acquisition of data. FT: data analysis. AA, MP.: supervision. A.L.: conception and supervision. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Institutional Research Review Board at IRCCS-ISMETT approved this study, with a waiver of informed consent.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    McKhann GM, Grega MA, Borowicz LM Jr, et al. Stroke and encephalopathy after cardiac surgery: an update. Stroke. 2006;37:562–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kowalewski M, Malvindi PG, Suwalski P, et al. Clinical Safety and Effectiveness of Endoaortic as Compared to Transthoracic Clamp for Small Thoracotomy Mitral Valve Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies. Ann Thorac Surg. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.08.072.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kowalewski M, Suwalski P, Pawliszak W, et al. Risk of stroke with "no-touch" – as compared to conventional off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. An updated meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 1;222:769–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Newman MF, Grocott HP, Mathew JP, et al. Report of the substudy assessing the impact of neurocognitive function on quality of life 5 years after cardiac surgery. Stroke. 2001;32:2874–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Selnes OA, Goldsborough MA, Borowicz LM Jr, et al. Determinants of cognitive change after coronary artery bypass surgery: a multifactorial problem. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;67:1669–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Raffa GM, Kowalewski M, Brodie D, et al. Meta-analysis of peripheral or central ECMO in Postcardiotomy and non-Postcardiotomy shock. Ann Thorac Surg 2018 Jun 27. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.05.063.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gozdek M, Raffa GM, Suwalski P, Kolodziejczak M, Anisimowicz L, Kubica J, Navarese EP, Kowalewski M. SIRIO-TAVI group. Comparative performance of transcatheter aortic valve-in-valve implantation versus conventional surgical redo aortic valve replacement in patients with degenerated aortic valve bioprostheses: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018;53:495–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Raffa GM, Luca A, Badhwar V, et al. International participation in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons database improves outcomes: initial Italian experience. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2028–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mahanna EP, Blumenthal JA, White WD, et al. Defining neuropsychological dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 1996;61:1342–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bucerius J, Gummert JF, Borger MA, et al. Stroke after cardiac surgery: a risk factor analysis of 16,184 consecutive adult patients. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:472–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baker RA, Hallsworth LJ, Knight JL. Stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1746–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Wolman RL, Nussmeier NA, Aggarwal A, et al. Cerebral injury after cardiac surgery: identification of a group at extraordinary risk. Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group (McSPI) and the Ischemia Research Education Foundation (IREF) Investigators. Stroke. 1999;30:514–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Floyd TF, Shah PN, Price CC, et al. Clinically silent cerebral ischemic events after cardiac surgery: their incidence, regional vascular occurrence, and procedural dependence. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81:2160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Almassi GH, Sommers T, Moritz TE, et al. Stroke in cardiac surgical patients: determinants and outcome. Ann Thorac Surg. 1999;68:391–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Raffa GM, Romano G, Turrisi M, et al. Pathoanatomic findings and treatment during hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy surgery: the role of mitral valve. Heart Lung Circ. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2018.02.006.
  16. 16.
    Raffa GM, Di Gesaro G, Sciacca S, et al. Heart transplant program at IRCCS-ISMETT: impact of mechanical circulatory support on pre- and post-transplant survival. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:358–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Raffa GM, Mularoni A, Di Gesaro G, et al. Thalassemia and heart surgery: aortic valve repair after endocarditis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;99:e1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raffa GM, D'Ancona G, Romano G, et al. Should device replacement be the first choice strategy in continuous-flow left ventricle assist device thrombosis? Analysis of 9 events and results after endoventricular thrombolysis. Int J Cardiol. 2015;178:159–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Raffa GM, Wu B, Pasta S, et al. Patients with bicuspid aortic valve are likely to receive an aortic valve prosthesis during prophylactic resection of their ascending aortic aneurysm. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Mar 1;206:97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology. 2003;229:340–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Thurnher MM, Castillo M. Imaging in acute stroke. Eur Radiol. 2005;15:408–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Beauchamp NJ Jr, Barker PB, Wang PY, et al. Imaging of acute cerebral ischemia. Radiology. 1999;212:307–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Selim M. Perioperative stroke. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:706–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Perrotta S, Lentini S, Rinaldi M, et al. Treatment of ascending aorta disease with Bentall-De bono operation using a mini-invasive approach. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2008;9:1016–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Barbone A, Malvindi PG, Sorabella RA, et al. 6 months of "temporary" support by Levitronix left ventricular assist device. Artif Organs. 2012;36:639–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hirotani T, Kameda T, Kumamoto T, et al. Stroke after coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with cerebrovascular disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70:1571–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ascher E, Hingorani A, Yorkovich W, et al. Routine preoperative carotid duplex scanning in patients undergoing open heart surgery: is it worthwhile? Ann Vasc Surg. 2001;15:669–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Iribarren C, Sidney S, Sternfeld B, et al. Calcification of the aortic arch: risk factors and association with coronary heart disease, stroke, and peripheral vascular disease. JAMA. 2000;283:2810–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lin E, Hwang W. Imaging assessment of cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197:W1046–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lorenz MW, Markus HS, Bots ML, et al. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation. 2007;115:459–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Barnett HJ. The inappropriate use of carotid endarterectomy. CMAJ. 2004;171:473–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Eigenbrodt ML, Evans GW, Rose KM, et al. Bilateral common carotid artery ultrasound for prediction of incident strokes using intima-media thickness and external diameter: an observational study. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2013;15:11–22.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Pawliszak W, Kowalewski M, Raffa GM, et al. Cerebrovascular events after no-touch off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting, conventional side-clamp off-pump coronary artery bypass, and proximal anastomotic devices: a meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc.  https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.115.002802.
  34. 34.
    Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Raffa GM, et al. Safety and efficacy of miniaturized extracorporeal circulation when compared with off-pump and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting: evidence synthesis from a comprehensive Bayesian-framework network meta-analysis of 134 randomized ontrolled trials involving 22 778 patients. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1428–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kowalewski M, Pawliszak W, Malvindi PG, et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting improves short-term outcomes in high-risk patients compared with on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: meta-analysis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016;151:60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Raffa GM, Tarelli G, Patrini D, et al. Sutureless repair for postinfarction cardiac rupture: a simple approach with a tissue-adhering patch. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;145:598–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Sharma V, Deo SV, Park SJ, et al. Meta-analysis of staged versus combined carotid endarterectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;97:102–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sabik JF 3rd, Blackstone EH, Houghtaling PL, et al. Is reoperation still a risk factor in coronary artery bypass surgery? Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80:1719–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malvindi PG, Raffa GM, Basciu A, et al. Bicuspidy does not affect reoperation risk following aortic valve reimplantation. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012;14:717–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Raffa GM, Malvindi PG, Settepani F, et al. Aortic valve replacement for paraprosthetic leak after transcatheter implantation. J Card Surg. 2012;27:47–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Malvindi PG, Cappai A, Raffa GM, et al. Analysis of postsurgical aortic false aneurysm in 27 patients. Tex Heart Inst J. 2013;40:274–80.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tomandl BF, Klotz E, Handschu R, et al. Comprehensive imaging of ischemic stroke with multisection CT. Radiographics. 2003;23:565–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giuseppe Maria Raffa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francesco Agnello
    • 2
  • Giovanna Occhipinti
    • 3
  • Roberto Miraglia
    • 2
  • Vincenzina Lo Re
    • 4
  • Gianluca Marrone
    • 2
  • Fabio Tuzzolino
    • 5
  • Antonio Arcadipane
    • 3
  • Michele Pilato
    • 1
  • Angelo Luca
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiac Surgery and Heart Transplantation Unit, Department for the Treatment and Study of Cardiothoracic Diseases and Cardiothoracic TransplantationIRCCS – ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione)PalermoItaly
  2. 2.Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, Radiology UnitIRCCS – ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione)PalermoItaly
  3. 3.Department of Anesthesia and Critical CareIRCCS – ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione)PalermoItaly
  4. 4.Neurology Service, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Services, IRCCS – ISMETTPalermoItaly
  5. 5.Statistician, Research OfficeIRCCS ISMETT (Mediterranean Institute for Transplantation and Advanced Specialized Therapies)PalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations