Acetabular reinforcement ring with additional hook improves stability in three-dimensional finite element analyses of dysplastic hip arthroplasty
- 295 Downloads
The stability of acetabulum reconstructions using reinforcement rings and hooks is important for successful replacement surgery. The objective of this study was to biomechanically determine the effects of the hook on stress and the related micromotions of the acetabular reinforcement ring during the immediate postoperative period.
Acetabular reinforcement ring models were developed using a nonlinear, three-dimensional, finite element method. Using a pre-prepared template, we constructed without-hook and bone graft models of varying volumes and material properties.
The stress on the inferior margin of the acetabulum was higher in the with-hook model than in the without-hook model, especially with increased bone graft volumes, and the stiffness of the bone graft material was decreased. Relative micromotions in the without-hook model were higher than in the with-hook models. The highest relative micromotion was observed in the model with increased bone graft volume and lower stiffness of bone graft material.
In biomechanical analyses, the hook effectively dispersed stress and improved the initial fixation strength of the acetabular reinforcement ring.
KeywordsFinite element method Total hip arthroplasty Acetabular reinforcement ring Primary implant stability
Acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook
Total hip arthroplasty
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a widely used replacement surgical method that requires primary implant stability. Under conditions of severe bone deficiency around the acetabulum, acetabular reconstructions are needed to provide bony support for acetabulum restoration [1, 2, 3, 4]. To this end, acetabular support rings can address severe bone stock deficiencies in patients with acetabular dysplasia or revision THA. Ganz previously developed an acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook (ARRH) for bone grafts and demonstrated improved fixation of the grafted bone, initial fixation of the cup, and stability of the reconstructed acetabulum . In these procedures, the hook of the ring is placed around the inferior margin of the acetabulum to facilitate the placement of the cup in the correct anatomical position. Although the effects of the hook have not been investigated in mechanical analyses, proper placement of the hook is believed to improve the primary stability of the ring and to prevent migration . As migration of the ARRH with breakage of the hook indicates a loosening of the acetabular component [7, 8, 9, 10, 11], biomechanical analyses are increasingly performed using the finite element method, which has been used by several investigators to analyze load distributions of acetabular reinforcement rings [12, 13, 14]. We also reported the effects of the ARRH on acetabular dysplasia, and compared the efficacy of varying numbers and insertion sites of screws , but did not conduct detailed analyses of the biomechanical roles of the hook. In this study, we used the finite element method to develop a detailed model of the hip joint and analyzed the biomechanical effects of the hook of the ARRH in bone grafts for acetabular dysplasia. In these analyses, we considered the severity of acetabular dysplasia and the type of bone graft material used.
In the present bone graft models, we simulated the treatment of acetabular defects with morselized bone grafts, as described previously [25, 26, 27]. Young’s moduli for the bone graft site were set at 42 (low) or 150 MPa (high). The respective low- and high-stiffness bone graft values were set according to previous reports, and the corresponding Poisson ratio was 0.2.
The ARRH (50 mm) was subsequently fixed to the acetabulum by inserting the hook into the obturator foramen and immobilizing the ring using three threaded 6.5-mm cancellous screws. The without-hook model was then created by omitting the hook element from the original ARRH. The interface between the ARRH and the pelvic bone was assumed to be a nonlinear contact problem, with friction set to 0.88 as described previously . The screw–bone and screw–ring interfaces were assumed to be bound, and an acetabular cup (outer/inner diameters, 48/26 mm; MX Hip Joint Prosthesis, Mizuho Medical Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was mounted on the ring with a lateral opening angle of 45°, an anterior opening angle of 15°, and the assumption of 1-mm-thick cement fixation. The femoral head was modeled as a hemisphere and was bound to the cup.
Loading conditions were as described by Bergmann et al. . In this model, force magnitudes and directions were normalized to the regular gait of patients with THA, and 1948 N was applied to the center of the head of each model. Regarding boundary conditions, areas corresponding to the sacroiliac joint and pubic symphysis of the pelvic bone were completely restrained. Nonlinear parametric analyses were performed with force control in the numerical procedure, and the Newton–Raphson method was used iteratively with incremental loads in 20 steps. After loading of models, von Mises stress distributions and relative micromotions were compared.
Relative micromotions tended to be lower in type 1 than in type 2 models and tended to be lower with the high bone graft than with the low bone graft. Correspondingly, maximum micromotion values were highest in the type 2/low without-hook model and were lowest in the type 1/high with-hook model.
Herein, the effects of the ARRH hook were determined for various types of bone grafts. Our comparisons of with- and without-hook models confirm that the hook disperses stress and reduces relative micromotions. In the present models, the hook was inserted into the obturator foramen by immobilizing the ring in the anatomical position using three threaded cancellous screws. Following bone grafting with hooks, stresses on the bone graft were low, whereas those around the screw holes, screw, hook, and the contact area between the hook and the bone were high. Hence, the load in the morselized bone graft was dispersed to the normal bone around the acetabulum. In the inferior acetabulum host bone area, stress was higher in without-hook models than in with-hook models, probably reflecting the separate insertion of hooks and screws into the obturator foramen, and the good bone stock that protects the bone of the acetabulum. In contrast, rings were compressed into the acetabulum in without-hook models. Hook models also tended to have lower relative micromotion values than without-hook models. These stress and relative micromotion data suggest that the stress is dispersed biomechanically by the ARRH and that the hook can effectively disperse stress and improve the primary stability of the ARRH. In a previous clinical report by the ARRH, Gerber et al.  suggested that the primary stability of the implant is enhanced by adequate screw purchase in the ilium and proper placement of the hook below the teardrop, which pre-tensions the ring similar to that in plate osteosynthesis procedures that are performed using a tension device or blade-plate. Hassan et al.  also suggested that the oval geometry and the inferior hook of the ring contribute to the stability by preventing the rotation and migration of the components. Our results demonstrate the biomechanical role of the hook as described in the previous study, with enhanced primary stability of the implant in comparison to without-hook models.
In comparisons of bone graft sizes and elastic moduli of bone graft materials, relative micromotion values tended to increase with the severity of acetabular dysplasia and the stiffness of the bone graft decreased concomitantly, suggesting an increased risk of poor initial fixation in patients with severe bone stock deficiencies and low bone graft material properties. Clinically, it is important to achieve sufficient bone coverage and initial stability of the acetabular component, especially during the reconstruction of severe acetabular bone defects in patients with acetabular dysplasia and in patients with osteoporosis receiving revision THA. Several clinical studies report hook breakage with loosening and/or migration of the acetabular component [7, 8, 9, 10, 11]. Breakage of the hook or screw is recognized as a mechanical failure and reportedly occurs when the bone graft is not strong enough to support the ARRH . Impaction during bone grafting was shown to increase the stiffness of the bone graft material and improve fixation and was applied during surgery [31, 32, 33]. In the hook model, the stress of the hook and screw in the type 2/low models was higher than in other models, suggesting an increased risk of poor initial fixation and mechanical failure. In patients with this type of massive bone defect, impaction bone grafting or bulk structural bone grafting are necessary to fix and to prevent mechanical failure [11, 34, 35, 36].
In this study, we investigated biomechanical aspects of the hook of acetabular reinforcement rings using finite element analyses. But we did not consider time-dependent mechanical responses, such as bone remodeling and ingrowth. As the severity of bone defects, the range of bone grafts, and the stiffness of bone grafts vary in clinical settings, the qualitative trends discussed here are to be applied with caution in clinical practice.
We investigated the effects of the hook of acetabular reinforcement rings on stress distributions and relative micromotions between the ring and pelvic bone. In the present model of increased bone graft volume, we observed increased stress around the contact area between the hook and the bone and increased micromotion with lower stiffness of the bone graft material. The hook can effectively disperse the stress of the acetabular reinforcement ring and lead to greater fixation strengths. Thus, the appropriate spatial placement of the hook and the use of proper bone grafting techniques will result in better clinical outcomes, especially following the reconstruction of massive bone defects in patients with osteoporosis.
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 17 K01362.
Availability of data and materials
Please contact the author for data requests.
KT, EC, GY, and HH contributed to the conception, design, data analysis, and interpretation. XZ, KO, and GD designed the computer model and performed the finite element analysis. All authors helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
- 4.Greber EM, Pelt CE, Gililland JM, Anderson MB, Erickson JA, Peters CL. Challenges in total hip arthroplasty in the setting of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:S38-S44.Google Scholar
- 7.Yoon TR, Rowe SM, Chung JY, Song EK, Lee KB, Jung ST, et al. Acetabular revision using acetabular roof reinforcement ring with a hook. J Arthroplasty. 2003;18:746–50.Google Scholar
- 8.Siebenrock KA, Tannast M, Kim S, Morgenstern W, Ganz R. Acetabular reconstruction using a roof reinforcement ring with hook for total hip arthroplasty in developmental dysplasia of the hip-osteoarthritis: minimum 10-year follow-up results. J Arthroplasty. 2005;20:492–8.Google Scholar
- 11.Park KS, Seon JK, Lee KB, Kim SK, Chan CK, Yoon TR. Revision total hip arthroplasty using an acetabular reinforcement ring with a hook: a precise follow-up, at average 11.4 years, of a previous report. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32:503–9.Google Scholar
- 12.Zhao X, Chosa E, Totoribe K, Watanabe S, Kawahara K, Deng G. Stress analysis of the acetabular reinforcement ring with hook in hip arthroplasty. Jpn J Clin Biomech (in Japanese). 2011;32:365–9.Google Scholar
- 14.Kaku N, Hara K, Tabata T, Tsumura H. Influence of the volume of bone defect, bone grafting methods, and hook fixation on stress on the Kerboull-type plate and screw in total hip arthroplasty: three-dimensional finite element analysis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2015;25:321–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Zhao X, Chosa E, Yamako G, Watanabe S, Deng G, Totoribe K. Effect of acetabular reinforcement ring with hook for acetabular dysplasia clarified by three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2013;28:1765–9.Google Scholar
- 21.Black J. Orthopaedic biomaterials in research and practice; 1988.Google Scholar
- 32.Ullmark G, Nilsson O. Impacted corticocancellous allografts: recoil and strength. J Arthroplasty. 1999;14:1019–23.Google Scholar
- 35.Gill TJ, Sledge JB, Müller ME. The management of severe acetabular bone loss using structural allograft and acetabular reinforcement devices. J Arthroplasty. 2000;15:1–7.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.