Diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis: lessons learned over 30 years: pectoral assay
Diagnosing abdominal tuberculosis remains a great challenge even for experienced clinicians. It is a great mimicker that has unusual presentations. A high index of suspicion is essential for reaching its diagnosis. Clinical and radiological findings of abdominal tuberculosis are non-specific. Herein, we report the lessons we have learned over the last 30 years stemming from our own mistakes in diagnosing abdominal tuberculosis supported by illustrative challenging clinical cases. Furthermore, we report our diagnostic algorithm for abdominal tuberculosis. This diagnostic algorithm will help in reaching the proper diagnosis by histopathology or microbiology. Our diagnostic workup depends on categorizing the clinical and radiological findings of abdominal tuberculosis into five different categories including (1) gastrointestinal, (2) solid organ lesions, (3) lymphadenopathy, (4) wet peritonitis, and (5) dry/fixed peritonitis. The diagnosis in gastrointestinal tuberculosis and dry peritonitis can be reached by endoscopy. The diagnosis in solid organ lesions can be reached by ultrasound-guided aspiration. The diagnosis in wet peritonitis and lymphadenopathy can be reached by ultrasound-guided aspiration followed by laparoscopy if needed. Diagnostic laparotomy should be kept as the last option for achieving a histological diagnosis. Capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy were not included in the diagnostic algorithm because of the limited data of using these modalities in abdominal tuberculosis. They need special expertise, and rarely used in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, capsule endoscopy may cause complete intestinal obstruction in small bowel strictures. A definite diagnosis can be reached in only 80% of the patients. Therapeutic diagnosis should be tried in the remaining 20%.
KeywordsTuberculosis Extrapulmonary Abdominal Diagnosis Surgery Algorithm
Interferon-gamma release assay
Polymerase chain reaction
Tuberculin skin test
World Health Organization
Charles Dickens (1812–1870) has described tuberculosis (TB) as “a dread disease in which struggle between soul and body is gradual quiet and solemn, that day by day, and grain by grain, the mortal part wastes and withers away.” This may be true till now. Tuberculosis is one of the top 10 causes of death, globally. In 2017, ten million people developed tuberculosis, with an estimated 1.3 million deaths . Furthermore, about one-quarter of the global population has latent tuberculosis infection . Currently, the management is even more complex with the emerging of multi drug-resistant bacteria.
Extrapulmonary tuberculosis occurs in about 20% of tuberculosis  while abdominal tuberculosis constitutes about 10% of extra-pulmonary tuberculosis . There are three ways in which the tubercle bacilli can infect the abdomen: (1) through ingestion of infected sputum or milk, (2) through hematogenous or lymphatic spread and finally (3) through direct spread into the peritoneum from the fallopian tubes [4, 5]. Surgery is performed in about 15% of the cases of abdominal tuberculosis; half of these are performed as acute surgery including obstruction, abscess formation, perforation, or hemorrhage with the other half as a diagnostic procedure . We have treated 24 cases of proven abdominal tuberculosis in Al-Ain Hospital, Al-Ain, United Arab Emirates, during the last 8 years with an average of 3 new cases every year in a hospital covering a population of 600,000. That would be less than 1% of the acute abdomen admitted to our hospital and gives an incidence of abdominal tuberculosis of about 0.5 per each 100,000 population per year in our current setting. In comparison, 44 cases of abdominal tuberculosis were treated in Mubarak Al-Kabeer and Adan Hospitals, Kuwait, during the period of 1981–1990 which was covering a population of 1,250,000, giving an incidence of 0.35 per each 100,000 population per year. Eight of these 44 patients had pulmonary tuberculosis (18%), 2 had soft tissue tuberculosis (4.5%), 1 had spinal tuberculosis (2.3%), 1 had a brain tuberculoma (2.3%), and 1 had tuberculous cervical adenopathy (2.3%) (Abu-Zidan FM. Management of abdominal tuberculosis in the Gulf region. Unpublished data).
The diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis remains one of the most challenging tasks in clinical practice. With increased immigration and increased HIV, clinicians worldwide are faced more and more with such unfamiliar cases. We have observed that the common misconceptions on abdominal tuberculosis did not change over the last 30 years. These misconceptions are (1) abdominal tuberculosis is rare, (2) abdominal tuberculosis is always associated with active pulmonary tuberculosis, and (3) abdominal tuberculosis is a disease of the poor . These misconceptions usually distract experienced clinicians from reaching the proper diagnosis.
This unusual dramatic presentation stimulated great interest in this challenging diagnosis. We will try in this communication to highlight the important lessons we have learned over the last 30 years. Due to increased immigration, we think that these lessons are important and will be useful for young surgeons who may not have faced abdominal tuberculosis before especially in developed countries. We will try to highlight each lesson by an illustrative clinical case to support our statements. Finally, we will describe an algorithm for diagnosing abdominal tuberculosis that was developed over the years and that can be useful globally including low- and middle-income countries.
Lesson 1: Abdominal tuberculosis is a great mimicker
The lesson learnt from the first case (Fig. 1) is that abdominal tuberculosis is a great mimicker [5, 9]. This is because it can affect single abdominal organs without chest involvement. Other organs are usually not involved. A high index of suspicion is needed for this diagnosis [5, 9, 10]. We have personally encountered cases in which isolated single organ abdominal tuberculosis mimicked pancreatic tumors, colonic cancer, gastric cancer, and lymphomas. It can also mimic infectious diseases including appendicitis, acute cholecystitis, typhoid fever, and necrotizing fasciitis [11, 12, 13, 14]. Even in areas where the disease is prevalent, a correct clinical diagnosis is made in only half of the patients . Malignancy was the preoperative diagnosis in 25% in our own series .
Lesson 2: Radiological finding of abdominal TB is non-specific
Ultrasonography and computed tomography CT scan may show generalized or localized ascites with thin mobile septa, thick omentum and peritoneum, lymphadenopathy, or thickened bowel [4, 17, 18, 19]. CT scan is the modality of choice in evaluating the extent and type of abdominal tuberculosis [4, 5, 10, 20, 21]. Nevertheless, radiological findings are non-specific  and a microbiological or histopathological confirmation should be obtained by percutaneous aspiration or direct biopsy .
Lesson 3: CT scan can miss liver tuberculosis
Lesson 4: An algorithm to diagnose abdominal tuberculosis
We did not include capsule endoscopy and enteroscopy in the diagnostic algorithm because of the limited data of using these modalities in abdominal tuberculosis . We did not use this modality in abdominal tuberculosis in our setting. Furthermore, it is expensive, needs special expertise, and rarely used in low- and middle-income countries. Furthermore, capsule endoscopy may cause complete intestinal obstruction in small bowel strictures.
Lesson 5: Beware of laparoscopy in fibrotic-fixed peritonitis
Lesson 6: The value of therapeutic diagnosis
Lesson 7: Beware of misdiagnosing TB as Crohn’s disease
Starting patients who have abdominal tuberculosis on steroids on the assumption that it is Crohn’s disease can have dramatic effects and can even lead to death [4, 9]. The differential diagnosis between the two is difficult and there should be every effort to reach a proper diagnosis by getting microbiological or histopathological evidence. The prevalence of the disease in a setting should be considered and caution should be adopted before starting steroids. If in doubt, it may be wiser to start a therapeutic trial of anti-tuberculous treatment as a diagnostic method before steroids.
The value of new laboratory investigation in abdominal TB
Recently, there have been new immunological and molecular diagnostic techniques for tuberculosis. Nevertheless, a simple global and cost-effective diagnostic laboratory test that can be used routinely to diagnose extra-pulmonary tuberculosis on a global level is still awaited. One of the major limitations of using these new techniques is its cost . We have to be careful when interpreting the published data. Although the sensitivity and specificity of certain tests are very high, the positive and negative predictive values are the important clinical useful values and will change with the prior prevalence of the disease. Furthermore, they do not replace the need for routine AFB smear and culture . Accordingly, the WHO policy recommendation states that “Neither interferon-gamma release assays (IGRA) nor the tuberculin skin test (TST) should be used for the diagnosis of active TB disease in low- and middle-income countries” . Actually, IGRAs are more expensive and more difficult to perform compared with TST although they give comparable results.
When routine laboratory and microbiology tests are non-conclusive, then molecular biology-polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results may support the clinical diagnosis while waiting for the culture results and drug susceptibility . Nevertheless, PCR cannot differentiate between living and dead M. tuberculosis [36, 38]. They remain positive for long periods after completion of anti-TB treatment and death of the bacteria. They should be used only for initial diagnosis and not for follow-up . Furthermore, the excellent results reported from research labs may not be reproduced by service clinical labs. There are contamination, technical, and sampling errors in the clinical labs that may give false positive results and reduce the generalizability of these tests .
WHO currently recommends only the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for diagnosing TB. It can provide results within 2 h . A recent meta-analysis has shown that Xpert has high specificity but limited sensitivity for detecting extrapulmonary TB. A positive Xpert result may rapidly identify TB cases. Nevertheless, negative results cannot rule out the disease .
Tuberculosis is a global health problem. Acute care surgeons should be familiar with the challenges encountered in diagnosing abdominal tuberculosis and try their best to avoid surgery unless indicated . In reality, acute care surgeons may find themselves trapped in situations where peritonitis, unresolved bowel obstruction or suspected bowel ischemia are associated with signs of systemic sepsis that cannot be explained by the non-specific CT findings. Experienced surgeons may decide for an emergency laparoscopy or laparotomy and get surprised by the operative and pathological findings confirming abdominal tuberculosis. A simple cost-effective diagnostic laboratory test that can be used routinely for abdominal tuberculosis is not yet available. Currently, the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis should be reached by a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiographic, and pathological findings. A high index of suspicion is essential for reaching this diagnosis. We have shared our mistakes and suggested our diagnostic algorithm for abdominal tuberculosis that was developed over the years hoping that it will be useful for acute care surgeons.
Data sharing statement
There is no additional data to share.
AFM had the idea, critically read the literature, drew and supplied the images, wrote the paper, and approved its final version. MS-H participated in the idea, critically read the literature on laboratory diagnosis of TB, helped in the manuscript, and approved its final version. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The paper does not have any information that can identify any patient. There are no clinical images. Only radiological and histopathological images were used. Patients were from two different countries treated over 30 years so patients could not be contacted after this long period of time to get their written consents.
Consent for publication
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
- 1.World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2018, World Health Organization, Geneva, 2018, https://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/en/ (accessed 16 May 2019)
- 7.Haddad FS, Ghossain A, Sawaya E, Nelson AR. Abdominal tuberculosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1987;30:724-735. PubMed PMID: 3304887.Google Scholar
- 8.Diab S, Abu Nema T, Abu Zidan F. Portal hypertension complicating abdominal tuberculosis. Case report. Acta Chir Scand. 1990;156:495-497. PubMed PMID: 2368554.Google Scholar
- 10.Evans RP, Mourad MM, Dvorkin L, Bramhall SR. Hepatic and intra-abdominal tuberculosis: 2016 update. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2016;18:45. PubMed PMID: 27796776.Google Scholar
- 11.al-Hilaly MA, Abu-Zidan FM, Zayed FF, Suleiman JD, Farid LS. Tuberculous appendicitis with perforation. Br J Clin Pract. 1990;44:632-633. PubMed PMID: 2102163.Google Scholar
- 12.Abu-Zidan FM, Zayat I. Gallbladder tuberculosis (case report and review of the literature). Hepatogastroenterology. 1999;46:2804-2806. PubMed PMID: 10576349.Google Scholar
- 13.Eid HO, Hefny AF, Joshi S, Abu-Zidan FM. Non-traumatic perforation of the small bowel. Afr Health Sci. 2008;8:36-39. PubMed PMID: 19357730; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2408541.Google Scholar
- 14.Hefny AF, Abu-Zidan FM. Necrotizing fasciitis as an early manifestation of tuberculosis: report of two cases. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2010;16:174-176. PubMed PMID: 20517775.Google Scholar
- 15.Kapoor VK, Sharma LK. Abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Surg. 1988 ;75:2-3. PubMed PMID: 3276368.Google Scholar
- 16.Abu-Zidan F, Al-Hilaly M, Diab S. Abdominal tuberculosis in Kuwait. In: Montorsi M, Zennaro F, editors. Proceedings of the Second World Week of Professional Updating in Surgery and Oncological Disciplines of the University of Milan. General Surgery, Vol VII. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore; 1990. p. 41–6.Google Scholar
- 17.Sheikh M, Abu-Zidan F, al-Hilaly M, Behbehani A. Abdominal tuberculosis: comparison of sonography and computed tomography. J Clin Ultrasound. 1995;23:413-417. PubMed PMID: 7560154.Google Scholar
- 18.Akhan O, Pringot J. Imaging of abdominal tuberculosis. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:312-323. PubMed PMID: 11870428.Google Scholar
- 19.Batra A, Gulati MS, Sarma D, Paul SB. Sonographic appearances in abdominal tuberculosis. J Clin Ultrasound. 2000;28:233-245. PubMed PMID: 10800002.Google Scholar
- 20.Abu-Zidan F, Al-Hilaly M, Mohtasib S, Denath F, Diab S. Role of CT Scan in the diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. In: Montorsi M, Zennaro F, editors. Proceedings of the Second World Week of Professional Updating in Surgery and Oncological Disciplines of the University of Milan. General Surgery, Vol VII. Bologna: Monduzzi Editore; 1990. p. 35–40.Google Scholar
- 21.Suri S, Gupta S, Suri R. Computed tomography in abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Radiol. 1999;72:92-98. PubMed PMID: 10341698.Google Scholar
- 22.Maclean KA, Becker AK, Chang SD, Harris AC. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis: imaging features beyond the chest. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2013;64:319-324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carj.2012.07.002. PubMed PMID: 23267519.
- 23.Skoura E, Zumla A, Bomanji J. Imaging in tuberculosis. Int J Infect Dis. 2015;32:87-93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2014.12.007. PubMed PMID: 25809762.
- 24.Shah S, Thomas V, Mathan M, Chacko A, Chandy G, Ramakrishna BS, Rolston DD. Colonoscopic study of 50 patients with colonic tuberculosis. Gut. 1992;33:347-351. PubMed PMID: 1568653; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1373825.Google Scholar
- 27.Suri R, Gupta S, Gupta SK, Singh K, Suri S. Ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in abdominal tuberculosis. Br J Radiol. 1998;71:723-727. PubMed PMID: 9771382.Google Scholar
- 28.Bhargava DK, Shriniwas, Chopra P, Nijhawan S, Dasarathy S, Kushwaha AK. Peritoneal tuberculosis: laparoscopic patterns and its diagnostic accuracy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992;87:109-112. PubMed PMID: 1530803.Google Scholar
- 29.McLaughlin S, Jones T, Pitcher M, Evans P. Laparoscopic diagnosis of abdominal tuberculosis. Aust N Z J Surg. 1998;68:599-601. PubMed PMID: 9715139.Google Scholar
- 30.al Quorain AA, Satti MB, al Gindan YM, al Ghassab GA, al Freihi HM. Tuberculous peritonitis: the value of laparoscopy. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991;38 Suppl 1:37-40. PubMed PMID: 1668376.Google Scholar
- 31.Raut AA, Naphade PS, Ramakantan R. Imaging Spectrum of Extrathoracic Tuberculosis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2016;54:475-501. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2015.12.013. PubMed PMID: 27153784.
- 33.Singh V, Kumar P, Kamal J, Prakash V, Vaiphei K, Singh K. Clinicocolonoscopic profile of colonic tuberculosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 1996;91:565-568. PubMed PMID: 8633510.Google Scholar
- 34.Uygur-Bayramicli O, Dabak G, Dabak R. A clinical dilemma: abdominal tuberculosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2003;9:1098-1101. PubMed PMID: 12717865; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4611381.Google Scholar
- 36.American Thoracic Society. Diagnostic standards and classification of tuberculosis in adults and children. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161:1376-1395. PubMed PMID: 10764337.Google Scholar
- 37.World Health Organization. Use of tuberculosis interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs) in low- and middle-income countries Policy Statement, vol. 2011. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
- 38.Mehta PK, Raj A, Singh N, Khuller GK. Diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by PCR. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;66:20-36. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00987.x. PubMed PMID: 22574812.
- 39.World Health Organization Global tuberculosis report 2017. World Health Organization, Geneva, 2017.Google Scholar
- 40.Penz E, Boffa J, Roberts DJ, Fisher D, Cooper R, Ronksley PE, James MT. Diagnostic accuracy of the Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for extra-pulmonary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:278-284, i-iii. doi: https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtld.14.0262. Review. PubMed PMID: 25686134.
- 41.Khan R, Abid S, Jafri W, Abbas Z, Hameed K, Ahmad Z. Diagnostic dilemma of abdominal tuberculosis in non-HIV patients: an ongoing challenge for physicians. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:6371-6375. PubMed PMID: 17072964; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4088149.Google Scholar
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.