Advertisement

Posterior HOX genes and HOTAIR expression in the proximal and distal colon cancer pathogenesis

  • Fabiana Tatangelo
  • Annabella Di Mauro
  • Giosuè Scognamiglio
  • Gabriella Aquino
  • Antonio Lettiero
  • Paolo Delrio
  • Antonio Avallone
  • Monica Cantile
  • Gerardo Botti
Open Access
Research
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Disease Biomarkers

Abstract

Background

Increasing evidences showed that the location of the primary tumor on the right (proximal) or left (distal) side of the colon have a prognostic/predictive value for colon cancer patients. However, the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that contribute to the pathogenesis in different location of colon is still unclear. Probably an important role could be played by genes that control the spatial–temporal development of bodily structures, such as HOX genes.

Methods

The main purpose of this study was to analyze the expression of the paralogous 13 HOX genes and of the HOX regulating lncRNA HOTAIR in distal and proximal CRC cases. We have carried out a Tissue Micro Array with left and right CRC samples associated with all clinical-pathological parameters of patients. The expression of HOX genes was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and the staining of HOTAIR was performed by in situ hybridization using a specifically designed LNA probe.

Results

All paralogous 13 HOX genes and HOTAIR are silent in normal tissue and expressed in CRC samples. HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOTAIR showed a statistical association with lymph nodes metastasis (p value = 0.003, p value = 0.05, p value = 0.04). HOXB13, HOXC13 and lncRNA HOTAIR are overexpressed in right CRCs samples (p value < 0 and p value = 0.021). HOTAIR is also strongly correlated with HOXB13 (p value = 0.02) and HOXC13 (p value = 0.042) expression.

Conclusions

Our data highlighted an important role of posterior HOX genes in colorectal cancer carcinogenesis. Specifically, the aberrant expression of the HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOTAIR in proximal colon cancers could add an important dowel in understanding molecular mechanisms related to tumor pathogenesis in this location.

Keywords

Proximal and distal CRC pathogenesis HOX genes Prognosis 

Abbreviations

LncRNA

long non coding RNA

HOTAIR

hox transcript antisense intergenic RNA

CRC

colorectal cancer

MSI

microsatellite instability

KRAS

kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog

BRAF

V-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog b1

PIK3CA

phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha

WHO

World Health Organization Classification of Tumours

H&E

Hematoxylin & Eosin

Background

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) represents the third malignant tumor by incidence and mortality in Western countries. Recent data from American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) have demonstrated significant anatomical site-specific disparities in colon cancer patients survival [1]. Patients with tumor in the left side (descending colon, sigmoid colon and rectum) survived longer than those with tumors originated on the proximal side (cecum and ascending colon). In addition, the location of the primary colon tumor would be able to predict survival and determine the optimal treatment choice for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In fact, tumors on the right side, which have an unfavorable prognosis, do not benefit significantly from the addition of Cetuximab, while those on the left side benefit from it [2].

Significant biological differences associated with different embryonic origin of colon (middle intestine for the proximal colon and the posterior intestine for the distal colon) were well documented [3]. Biological heterogeneity also reflects significant molecular differences. Numerous studies have shown that proximal cancers are more often associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and may have mutations in KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes [3, 4]. Distal tumors frequently showed a deletion of a chromosome 18q region, and an amplification of EGFR and HER2 in 12% of cases [5].

However, the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that determine the pathogenesis of the tumor on the right or left side is still unclear. Probably an important role could be played by genes that control the spatio-temporal development of body structures. One of the most studied gene family and whose de-regulation is often associated with carcinogenesis and tumor progression is the Homeobox genes [6].

Homeobox genes are responsible for regulating normal embryonic development, cell differentiation and other critical processes of eukaryotic cell life. Several studies have shown that genes belonging to the class I homeobox genes (HOX genes) play a crucial role in neoplastic transformation in various human tissues. In particular, the genes belonging to HOX paralogous group 13 seem to carry out a relevant role in both tumor development and progression [7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13].

Recently it has been shown that the regulation of HOX gene expression is under the control of different non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) some of which are present within HOX loci [14]. The most studied among them is a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) named HOTAIR (Hox transcript antisense intergenic RNA) able to modulate metastatic progression in several human cancers [15].

Since some posterior genes of the HOX genes network, control the antero-posterior development of the gut [16], and their aberrant expression has been associated with colorectal carcinogenesis [17], in this study we decided to investigate the role of HOX genes belonging to the paralogous group 13 in a series of CRCs with different anatomical localization. We also focused the attention on the long non-coding RNA HOTAIR which controls in trans the expression of the locus HOX D genes and of several genes associated with metastatic progression [18].

Methods

CRCs patients

Eighty-two patients admitted to the National Cancer Institute “Giovanni Pascale” of Naples, between 2012 and 2017, were recruited in this study. All patients had provided written informed consent for the use of samples according to the institutional regulations and the study was approved by the ethics committee of the National Cancer Institute “G. Pascale”.

All CRCs cases have been reviewed by two pathologists (FT, GB) and graded and staged according to WHO 2010/AJCC 2017 classification criteria, on standard tissue sections.

Medical records have been reviewed for clinical information, including histologic parameters, assessed on standard H&E-stained slides, and tumor location (right or left).

Immunohistochemistry analysis

All selected samples derived from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues (FFPE) including tumor, non-neoplastic colonic mucosa, and adenomatous dysplastic modifications areas. We have built a Tissue Micro Array (TMA) using cores representative of all three components. Immunohistochemical staining was carried out on slides from, (FFPE) in order to evaluate the expression of HOX A13, HOX B13, HOX C13, HOXD13 and Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). Paraffin slides was then deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated through graded alcohols. Antigen retrieval was performed with slides heated in 0.0.1 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0.) in a bath for 20 min at 97 °C. After antigen retrieval, the slides were allowed to cool. The slides were rinsed with TBS and the endogenous peroxidase has inactivated with 3% hydrogen peroxide. After protein block (BSA 5% in PBS 1×), the slides were incubated with primary antibody to human HOX A13 (dilution 1:200, cod. Ab106503, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HOX B13 (dilution 1:300, cod. ab28575, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HOXC13 (dilution 1:1200, cod.ab55251, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), HOX D13 (dilution 1:100, cod. Ab19866, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-CEA antibody (dilution 1:100; Leica, Newcastle, UK) overnight. Sections were incubated with mouse anti-rabbit or goat anti-mouse secondary IgG biotinylated secondary antibody for 30 min. Immunoreactivity was visualized by means of avidin–biotin–peroxydase complex kit reagents (Novocastra, Newcastle, UK) as the chromogenic substrate. Finally, sections were weakly counterstained with haematoxylin and mounted.

Evaluation of immunostaining

Antigen expression was independently evaluated by two experienced pathologists (FT/GB) using light microscopy. For paralogous 13 HOX genes nuclear and cytoplasmic localization were considered. All values of immunostaining were expressed only in percentage terms of positive cells. The percentage of positive cancer cells was evaluated in each sample by counting the number of positive cells over the total cancer cells in 10 non-overlapping fields using X400 magnification. Membrane and cytoplasmic CEA staining in tumor tissue was evaluated following an intensity score: negative (1), positive (2), or strongly positive (3).

Probe design for In Situ Hybridization (ISH)

For the development of in situ hybridization method we designed an RNA probe of 20 bp. Specifically, we analyzed the sequence of HOTAIR (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_000012.12). The gene is characterized by three different variants (variant 1: NR_047517.1; variant 2: NR_003716.3; variant 3: NR_047518.1) and for this reason we selected a sequence of approximately 20 bp common to all three variants. The sequence of the digoxin-labeled LNA™-Modified HOTAIR probe (Exiqon), is: 5DigN/TCTAAATCCGTTCCATTCCACT/3Dig_N.

ISH analysis

HOTAIR expression was examined by in situ hybridization in CRCs paraffin-embedded sections by using a commercial kit (FFPE ISH Detection Kit Optimization DNA RNA (Exiqon) containing two control probes (“LNA scrambled” consists of the same sequence of the forward probe and “LNA U6 snRNA” containing the sequence u6 of small nuclear RNAs (snRNA), respectively positive and negative control of ISH method. The two control probes were used in each reaction to verify the correct execution of the method.

Briefly, after dewaxing and rehydration, the samples were digested with proteinase K, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and hybridized with a 5′ digoxin-labeled LNA™-modified HOTAIR probe (Exiqon) overnight at 55 °C. The samples were then incubated overnight at 4 °C with an anti-digoxin monoclonal antibody (Roche Applied Science). The sections were stained with nitro blue tetrazolium/5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolylphosphate (NBT/BCIP) in the dark, mounted and observed. HOTAIR-positive staining (in blue) was detected on the membrane and in the cytoplasm of the cells. The staining scores were determined by microscopy on the basis of both intensity and proportion of HOTAIR-positive cells in 10 random fields under a 40× objective. The staining intensity of the cells was graded as previously reported [19]. The representative staining fields for each specimen were analyzed and scored independently by two observers who were blinded to each other and to the diagnoses of the specimens.

Statistical analysis

The stratification of high/low expression was based on the median percentage of cells expressing the proteins (HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13, HOXD13) and the LncRNA HOTAIR.

The association between HOX A13, HOX B13, HOX C13, HOX D13, HOTAIR with the clinic-pathological data was conducted using the χ2 test considering the median of expression for each marker as cut-off. Cut-offs were schematized in Additional file 1: Table S1.

The Pearson χ2 test was used to determine whether a relationship exists between the variables included in the study. The level of significance was defined as p < 0.05. All the statistical analyses were carried out using SPSS statistics 20.

Results

Clinical-pathological features of CRCs patients

Selected patients and their clinical-pathological characteristics are summarized in Additional file 2: Table S2.

The age of patients ranged from 50 to 91 years, with an average age of 65 years. 56.1% were female and 43.9% were male. For 58.5% of CRCs patients the lesion was located in the proximal colon, while for 41.5% in distal colon. Regarding T stage, 3.7% of patients had a primary tumor located in submucosal (T1), 30.5% in muscularis propria (T2), for 51,2% the lesion extended beyond muscularis propria (T3), and for 7.3% invaded the peritoneal surface and/or adjacent organs (T4).

Regarding lymph nodal invasion, 64.9% of CRCs patients showed no lymph node metastases (N0), 21.6% had 1-3 lymph node metastases (N1), and 12.2% showed > 4 lymph node metastases (N2). The most of CRCs patients (99%) showed no distant metastases. For tumor grading stratification, 3.7% were well differentiated adenocarcinoma (G1), 90.2% were moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma (G2), and 6.1% poor differentiated adenocarcinoma (G3).

Expression of paralogous 13 HOX proteins and HOTAIR mRNA in CRCs patients series

The immunohistochemical analysis mainly revealed a nuclear localization of paralogous 13 HOX proteins, whereas a cytoplasmic localization was observed only in some areas. HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOXD13 were not expressed in normal colonic tissues, whereas their expression was detected in the most of analyzed CRCs samples (Fig. 1).
Fig. 1

Paralogous group 13 HOX protein expression in colon tissue samples: a negative HOX A13 expression in colonic mucosa (×20); b positive HOX A13 nuclear expression in proximal CRC sample (×20); c positive HOX A13 nuclear expression in distal CRC sample (×20); d negative HOX B13 expression in colonic mucosa (×20); e positive HOX B13 nuclear expression in proximal CRC sample (×20); f negative HOX B13 nuclear expression in distal CRC sample (×20); g negative HOX C13 expression in colonic mucosa (×20); h positive HOX C13 nuclear expression in proximal CRC sample (×20); i negative HOX C13 nuclear expression in distal CRC sample (×20); l negative HOX D13 expression in colonic mucosa (×20); m positive HOX D13 nuclear expression in proximal CRC sample (×20); n positive HOX D13 nuclear expression in distal CRC sample (×20)

The same trend of expression was highlighted for the in situ determination of the lncRNA HOTAIR. HOTAIR appears to gradually increase in the transition from normal colonic tissue, adenomatous dysplastic area, adenocarcinoma, with a prevalent cytoplasmic and membrane staining in CRCs samples as shown in Fig. 2. In some cases HOTAIR staining was detected also in peri-intra tumoral lymphocyte component (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

HOTAIR expression in colon tissue samples: a negative HOTAIR expression in colonic mucosa (×20); b positive HOTAIR cytoplasmic expression in adenomatous dysplastic area (×20); c positive HOTAIR cytoplasmic expression in CRC sample (×20); d detail of lymphocytes staining in tumor microenvironment of CRC sample (×60)

Relation between paralogous 13 HOX and HOTAIR expression with clinic pathological features of CRCs patients series

For the statistical elaboration we considered the median of expression for each marker as cut-off (low and high) (Table 1). In detail, HOXA13 and HOXD13 appeared not correlated with clinic-pathological features of patients. HOX B13 showed a trend of statistical association with sex and age, and a strong direct statistical association with lymph nodes metastasis (p value = 0.003). The same trend of association with lymph nodes metastasis was detected for HOXC13 (p value = 0.051).
Table 1

Correlation between paralogous group 13 (HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13, HOXD13) and HOTAIR expression and main clinical features of CRC patients

 

HOXA13

p-value

HOXB13

p-value

HOXC13

p-value

HOXD13

p-value

HOTAIR

p value

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Gender

 M

24 (29.6)

19 (23.5)

1

19 (23.2)

25 (30.5)

0.081

24 (29.3)

20 (24.4)

1

27 (32.9)

17 (21)

1

8 (10.0)

36 (45.0)

0.78

 F

21 (25.9)

17 (21)

24 (29.3)

14 (17.1)

21 (25.6)

17 (20.7)

23 (29.1)

15 (20.8)

8 (10.0)

28 (35.0)

Age

 < 50

18 (22.2)

18 (22.2)

0.5

23 (28.0)

13 (15.9)

0.078

18 (22)

18 (22)

0.5

20 (24.4)

16 (19.5)

0.494

11 (23.9)

12

0.057

 > 50

27 (33.3)

18 (22.2)

20 (24.4)

26 (31.7)

27 (32.9)

19 (23.2)

30 (36;6)

16 (19.5)

4 (8.7)

19 (41.3)

T

 T1/T2

15 (19.2)

16 (20.5)

0.36

17 (21.5)

14 (17.7)

1

15 (19.2)

16 (20.3)

0.25

19 (24.1)

12 (15.2)

1

6 (7.8)

25 (32.5)

0.04

 T3/T4

28 (35.9)

19 (24.4)

26 (32.9)

22 (27.8)

30 (38)

18 (22.8)

29 (36.7)

19 (24.1)

10 (13.0)

36 (46.8)

Grade

 G1

1 (1.2)

2 (2.5)

0.855

2 (2.4)

1 (1.2)

1

2 (2.4)

1 (1.2)

1

3 (3.7)

0

0.307

2 (2.5)

1 (1.25)

1

 G2

41 (50.6)

32 (39.5)

38 (46.3)

36 (43.9)

40 (48.8)

34 (41.5)

45 (54.9)

29 (35.4)

40 (50)

32 (40)

 G3

3 (3.7)

2 (2.5)

3 (3.7)

2 (2.4)

3 (3.7)

2 (2.4)

2 (2.5)

3 (3.7)

3 (3.8)

2 (2.5)

N

 N0

31 (41.9)

17 (20.7)

0.134

32 (43.2)

16 (21.6)

0.003

32 (44.4)

16 (21.6)

0.051

31 (41.9)

17 (20.7)

0.456

14 (19.4)

33 (45.5)

0.04

 N+

11 (15.1)

14 (19.2)

8 (10.8)

18 (24.3)

11 (14.9)

15 (20.3)

14 (18.9)

12 (16.2)

2 (2.8)

23 (31.9)

Regarding HOTAIR we detected a trend of statistical association with age of CRC patients (p value = 0.057) and a significant statistical association with T stage (p value = 0.04) and lymph nodes metastasis (p = 0.04).

Relation between paralogous 13 HOX and HOTAIR expression and right/left CRC location

Regarding CRC localization, the distribution of HOX protein expression was very heterogeneous. Whereas HOXA13 does not show statistically significant associations, both HOXB13 and HOXC13 showed a strong association with right location of CRC samples (p value ≤ 0.001) (Fig. 3). A strong statistical association between high HOTAIR expression and right location of CRC samples is also present (p value = 0.021) (Fig. 3).
Fig. 3

Graphical representation of paralogous 13 HOX genes and HOTAIR distribution in right/left location of CRC tumor samples: a histogram of HOXA13 protein distribution; b histogram of HOXB13 protein distribution; c histogram of HOXC13 protein distribution; d histogram of HOXD13 protein distribution; e histogram of HOTAIR mRNA distribution. Blue line identify samples with low expression and green line those with high expression

Relation between HOTAIR and paralogous 13 HOX genes

HOXA13 appeared not correlated with HOTAIR expression, while a statistical association was detected between HOXB13 (p value = 0.02) and HOX C13 (p value = 0.042) expression and only a trend (p value = 0.063) with HOXD13 expression (Table 2).
Table 2

Correlation between paralogous group 13 (HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13, HOXD13) and HOTAIR expression in CRC samples

 

HOXA13

p-value

HOXB13

p-value

HOXC13

p-value

HOXD13

P-value

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

High

HOTAIR

 Low

23 (29,1)

22 (27,8)

0.37

29 (36,6)

16 (20)

0.024

29 (36,3)

16 (20)

0.042

32 (44,4)

13 (16,25)

0.063

 High

21 (26,6)

13 (16,5)

13 (16,3)

22 (27,5)

14 (17,5)

21 (26,3)

17 (20,7)

18 (22,2)

CEA expression relation with lymph node metastasis status and paralogous 13 HOX genes and HOTAIR expression

We performed IHC evaluation of CEA on our CRC case series (Additional file 3: Figure S1). CEA showed a trend of statistical association with lymph nodes metastasis (0.086) (Additional file 4: Table S3), but none statistical association with HOTAIR and HOX proteins.

Discussion

Colorectal carcinoma is the most common tumor of developed countries and is responsible for about 10% of deaths due to malignancy. Its incidence is increasing all over the world and in Europe each year 200,000 new cases are diagnosed. There is increasing evidence that the location of the primary tumor, distal and proximal position, has an important prognostic value in patients with colorectal cancer. A recent meta-analysis study that collected information on 143,746 patients clearly showed that patients with left-side tumors (descending colon, sigma, and rectum) survive longer than those with tumors originating on the proximal side (caecum and ascending colon) independent of stage, race, adjuvant chemotherapy [20]. It is already known that there are substantial biological and molecular differences between proximal and distal colorectal tumors, starting from the different embryonic origin, up to the different genetic instability and the frequency of specific mutations in the two different sites. Numerous studies have shown that proximal tumors are more often associated with microsatellite instability (MSI) and present further potentially deleterious mutations, including KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations [3, 4, 21]. The differences in the content of the lumen and of the bacterial flora between the left and right colon can also influence oncogenesis [22].

To deepen the understanding of the molecular mechanisms that determine the pathogenesis of the tumor on the left or right colon, in this study we decided to investigate the role of HOX genes belonging to the paralogous group 13 in a series of CRCs with different anatomical localization.

The HOX genes, in particular the posterior genes of the network, control the antero-posterior development of the intestine [16], and their aberrant expression has already been associated with colorectal carcinogenesis [17]. Our data showed the absence of expression of HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOXD13 in the normal mucosa, a slight increase in expression in the transitional mucosa, up to in many cases over-expressed in the tumor. In detail, HOX A13 and HOXD13 expression not show specific differences in the proximal/distal colon distribution and nor statistically significant associations with the clinical-pathological parameters of CRC patients. It is known that posterior HOX genes are expressed early during embryonic development of the intestine and represents during all embryogenic phases an important tissue-specific marker [16]. Although, numerous indications in the literature highlight their role in the pathogenesis and progression of various tumors associated with the digestive system, in particular in hepatocellular carcinoma [8], and gastric tumors [23] our data do not suggest a fundamental role of HOX A13 and HOXD13 genes in colon cancer evolution.

Regarding HOX B13 expression, it strongly correlates with lymph nodes metastasis and showed a prevalent expression in CRC samples located in the right side. In the literature, while the role of HOX B13 is very well detailed in the pathogenesis in particular of prostate tumors [24] and of the breast and ovarian cancers [25, 26], little information is present regarding its role in the neoplastic evolution of the colon. In only a single study on CRC cell models downregulation of HOX B13 has been described [27]. More recently, in line with our data, a gene array study showed a prevalence of its expression in the proximal localization of CRCs [28].

The same trend has been highlighted for HOXC13, correlated with lymph nodes metastasis and with a prevalent expression in the right CRCs samples. HOX C13 plays a fundamental role in the control of cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in cellular models of colorectal adenocarcinoma (SW480), breast carcinoma (MCF7), prostate cancer (PC3ML), cervical (HeLa), and renal (HEK293) [29].

As the expression of the HOX genes is under the control of a series of non-coding RNA that co-localize within the HOX loci [14], we have focused our attention in particular on the long non-coding RNA HOTAIR which controls in trans the expression of the locus D genes and genes associated with metastatic progression [15].

Our data have shown the expression in situ of the HOTAIR on tissue samples, that appears silent in healthy tissue, and becomes overexpressed in the neoplastic tissue, validating the previous studies carried out with molecular methods [30].

HOTAIR expression appears strongly statistically associated with T stage and lymph nodes metastasis and shows an higher expression in the tumors located in the right/proximal colon. Moreover, a direct correlation between HOTAIR and HOX B13 and HOX C13 has been highlighted in our case series.

Our data are in line with the previous studies carried out on different solid tumors, in which HOTAIR primarily appeared as marker of lymph node metastasis [18, 31, 32]. In support of this hypothesis, 2 meta-analysis studies have analyzed the large amount of data produced in recent years, showing that high HOTAIR expression in tumor tissue is strongly correlated with lymph node metastasis [33, 34]. In breast cancer patients high circulating HOTAIR level is also associated with lymph node metastasis [35].

On our CRC case series we have also performed an immunohistochemical analysis of CEA to establish its potential relation with lymph nodes metastasis status, as previously reported [36], and the expression of HOTAIR and HOX proteins. However, we do not show any strong statistical association nor with metastatic disease nor with the expression of selected markers.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our data highlighted an involvement of HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOTAIR in proximal colon cancers pathogenesis and in lymph nodes metastasis progression, highlighting the main role of these markers in prognosis of colon cancer patients. Beyond additional elements for the understanding of molecular mechanisms underlying the colon tumorigenesis we can speculate that our data may represent an important element for the development of potential therapies targeted against the activities of HOX genes. In fact, several studies showed the possibility of targeting the post-translational interaction between HOX proteins and their PBX cofactors, through the short peptide HXR9 that is able to bind a conserved six-amino acid sequence in the HOX proteins [37]. These in vitro and in vivo data supported more and more the therapeutic potential of inhibiting HOX/PBX dimer formation in cancer [38].

Additionally, the role of HOTAIR in the modulation of drug resistance mechanisms has been extensively described for several solid tumors [39, 40, 41], and since lncRNAs are molecules with high stability in biological fluids the detection of HOTAIR in the blood of CRC patients could represent an useful prognostic tool also for the prediction and monitoring of therapeutic response.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

FB and MC designed the study. PD and AA provided patients tissues and clinic information. ADM, GS and AL performed the IHC experiments. GA performed the ISH experiments. FB and GB analyzed the IHC and ISH data. MC and GB supervised the study. MC and FB wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We thank Ornella Sacco, data manager of Institutional BioBank, for provision of specimens clinic information and Alessandra Trocino, librarian at the National Cancer Institute of Naples, for bibliographic assistance.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

Materials used for the current study are available from the corresponding author.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of INT Fondazione Pascale. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Funding

This study was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health and bio-materials for in situ analysis were provided by Institutional BioBank (BBI) of INT Fondazione Pascale.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12967_2018_1725_MOESM1_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Additional file 1: Table S1. Cut-off expression of HOXA13, HOXB13, HOXC13 and HOTAIR.
12967_2018_1725_MOESM2_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Additional file 2: Table S2. Main clinic-pathological features of CRC patients.
12967_2018_1725_MOESM3_ESM.jpg (4.9 mb)
Additional file 3: Figure S1. CEA expression in colon tissue samples: a) low; b) medium and c) high IHC staining (×40).
12967_2018_1725_MOESM4_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Additional file 4: Table S3. Correlation between CEA expression and lymph nodes metastasis status.

References

  1. 1.
    Meeting. ASCO Annual Meeting Abstract No: 3501 First Author: Yong Sang Hong Category: Gastrointestinal (Colorectal) Cancer. 2018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brulé SY, Jonker DJ, Karapetis CS, O’Callaghan CJ, Moore MJ, Wong R, et al. Location of colon cancer (right-sided versus left-sided) as a prognostic factor and a predictor of benefit from cetuximab. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51:1405–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roma C, Rachiglio AM, Pasquale R, Fenizia F, Iannaccone A, Tatangelo F, et al. BRAF V600E mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer: methods of detection and correlation with clinical and pathologic features. Cancer Biol Ther. 2016;17(840–8):4.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Normanno N, Rachiglio AM, Lambiase M, Martinelli E, Fenizia F, Esposito C, et al. Heterogeneity of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA mutations in metastatic colorectal cancer and potential effects on therapy in the CAPRI GOIM trial. Ann Oncol. 2015;26:1710–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang SY, Cho MS, Kim NK. Difference between right-sided and left-sided colorectal cancers: from embryology to molecular subtype. Exp Rev Anticancer Ther. 2018;18:351–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lee MS, Menter DG, Kopetz S. Right versus left colon cancer biology: integrating the consensus molecular subtypes. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2017;15:411–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cillo C, Cantile M, Faiella A, Boncinelli E. Homeobox genes in normal and malignant cells. J Cell Physiol. 2001;188:161–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cillo C, Schiavo G, Cantile M, Bihl MP, Sorrentino P, Carafa V, et al. The HOX gene network in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Cancer. 2011;129:2577–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cantile M, Scognamiglio G, La Sala L, La Mantia E, Scaramuzza V, Valentino E, et al. Aberrant expression of posterior HOX genes in well differentiated histotypes of thyroid cancers. Int J Mol Sci. 2013;14:21727–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cantile M, Franco R, Tschan A, Baumhoer D, Zlobec I, Schiavo G, et al. HOX D13 expression across 79 tumor tissue types. Int J Cancer. 2009;125:1532–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Marra L, Cantile M, Scognamiglio G, Perdonà S, La Mantia E, Cerrone M, et al. Deregulation of HOX B13 expression in urinary bladder cancer progression. Curr Med Chem. 2013;20:833–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cantile M, Scognamiglio G, Anniciello A, Farina M, Gentilcore G, Santonastaso C, et al. Increased HOX C13 expression in metastatic melanoma progression. J Transl Med. 2012;10:91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Aquino G, Franco R, Sabatino R, Mantia EL, Scognamiglio G, Collina F, et al. Deregulation of paralogous 13 HOX genes in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Cancer Res. 2015;5:3042–55.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Botti G, De Chiara A, Di Bonito M, Cerrone M, Malzone MG, Collina F, Cantile M. Non-coding RNAs within the HOX gene network in tumor pathogenesis and progression. J Cell Physiol. 2018.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.27036.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Weidle UH, Birzele F, Kollmorgen G, Rüger R. Long non-coding RNAs and their role in metastasis. Cancer Genomics Proteom. 2017;14:143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zacchetti G, Duboule D, Zakany J. Hox gene function in vertebrate gut morphogenesis: the case of the caecum. Development. 2007;134:3967–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanai M, Hamada J, Takada M, Asano T, Murakawa K, Takahashi Y, et al. Aberrant expressions of HOX genes in colorectal and hepatocellular carcinomas. Oncol Rep. 2010;23:843–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gupta RA, Shah N, Wang KC, Kim J, Horlings HM, Wong DJ, et al. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR reprograms chromatin state to promote cancer metastasis. Nature. 2010;464:1071–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cantile M, Scognamiglio G, Marra L, Aquino G, Botti C, Falcone MR, et al. HOTAIR role in melanoma progression and its identification in the blood of patients with advanced disease. J Cell Physiol. 2017;232:3422–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Petrelli F, Tomasello G, Borgonovo K, Ghidini M, Turati L, Dallera P, et al. Prognostic survival associated with left-sided vs right-sided colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2016.  https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.4227.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bae JM, Kim JH, Kang GH. Differences in mutation rates between right- and left-sided colorectal adenocarcinoma. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2016;140:406–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dejea CM, Wick EC, Hechenbleikner EM, White JR, Mark Welch JL, Rossetti BJ, et al. Microbiota organization is a distinct feature of proximal colorectal cancers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2014;111:18321–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Chang S, Liu J, Guo S, He S, Qiu G, Lu J, Wang J, et al. HOTTIP and HOXA13 are oncogenes associated with gastric cancer progression. Oncol Rep. 2016;35:3577–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Varinot J, Comperat E. HOXB13 expression in metastatic prostate cancer. Virchows Arch. 2016;469:121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miao J, Wang Z, Provencher H, Muir B, Dahiya S, Carney E, et al. HOXB13 promotes ovarian cancer progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2007;104:17093–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang Z, Dahiya S, Provencher H, Muir B, Carney E, Coser K, et al. The prognostic biomarkers HOXB13, IL17BR, and CHDH are regulated by estrogen in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:6327–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jung C, Kim RS, Zhang H, Lee SJ, Sheng H, Loehrer PJ, et al. HOXB13 is downregulated in colorectal cancer to confer TCF4-mediated transactivation. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2233–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sanz-Pamplona R, Cordero D, Berenguer A, Lejbkowicz F, Rennert H, Salazar R, et al. Gene expression differences between colon and rectum tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17:7303–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kasiri S, Ansari KI, Hussain I, Bhan A, Mandal SS. Antisense oligonucleotide mediated knockdown of HOXC13 affects cell growth and induces apoptosis in tumor cells and over expression of HOXC13 induces 3D-colony formation. RSC Adv. 2013;3:3260–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Luo ZF, Zhao D, Li XQ, Cui YX, Ma N, Lu CX, Liu MY, Zhou Y. Clinical significance of HOTAIR expression in colon cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22(22):5254–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wu ZH, Wang XL, Tang HM, Jiang T, Chen J, Lu S, et al. Long non-coding RNA HOTAIR is a powerful predictor of metastasis and poor prognosis and is associated with epithelial–mesenchymal transition in colon cancer. Oncol Rep. 2014;32:395–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Qiu JJ, Lin YY, Ye LC, Ding JX, Feng WW, Jin HY, et al. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR predicts poor patient prognosis and promotes tumor metastasis in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2014;134:121–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sun Z, Wu XY, Wu CL. The association between LncRNA HOTAIR and cancer lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis: a meta-analysis. Neoplasma. 2018;65:178–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cai B, Wu Z, Liao K, Zhang S. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR can serve as a common molecular marker for lymph node metastasis: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:8445–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lv R, Zhang J, Zhang W, Huang Y, Wang N, Zhang Q, Qu S. Circulating HOTAIR expression predicts the clinical response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2018;22(2):249–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Resch A, Langner C. Lymph node staging in colorectal cancer: old controversies and recent advances. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8515–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Morgan R, Pirard PM, Shears L, Sohal J, Pettengell R, Pandha HS. Antagonism of HOX/PBX dimer formation blocks the in vivo proliferation of melanoma. Cancer Res. 2007;67:5806–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morgan R, El-Tanani M, Hunter KD, Harrington KJ, Pandha HS. Targeting HOX/PBX dimers in cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:32322–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Li J, Yang S, Su N, Wang Y, Yu J, Qiu H, He X. Overexpression of long non-coding RNA HOTAIR leads to chemoresistance by activating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human ovarian cancer. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:2057–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Liu MY, Li XQ, Gao TH, Cui Y, Ma N, Zhou Y, Zhang GJ. Elevated HOTAIR expression associated with cisplatin resistance in non-small cell lung cancer patients. J Thorac Dis. 2016;8:3314–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Xue X, Yang YA, Zhang A, Fong KW, Kim J, Song B, Li S, Zhao JC, Yu J. LncRNA HOTAIR enhances ER signaling and confers tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35:2746–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fabiana Tatangelo
    • 1
  • Annabella Di Mauro
    • 1
  • Giosuè Scognamiglio
    • 1
  • Gabriella Aquino
    • 1
  • Antonio Lettiero
    • 1
  • Paolo Delrio
    • 2
  • Antonio Avallone
    • 3
  • Monica Cantile
    • 1
  • Gerardo Botti
    • 4
  1. 1.Pathology UnitIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCSNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Colorectal Cancer Surgery UnitIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCSNaplesItaly
  3. 3.Abdominal Oncology UnitIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCSNaplesItaly
  4. 4.Scientific DirectionIstituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione G. Pascale-IRCCSNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations