Advertisement

Molecular Cancer

, 18:124 | Cite as

Exosomes promote pre-metastatic niche formation in ovarian cancer

  • Wenlong Feng
  • Dylan C. Dean
  • Francis J. Hornicek
  • Huirong ShiEmail author
  • Zhenfeng DuanEmail author
Open Access
Review

Abstract

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecological malignancies. Upon initial diagnosis, the majority of patients present with widespread metastatic growth within the peritoneal cavity. This metastatic growth occurs in stages, with the formation of a pre-metastatic niche occurring prior to macroscopic tumor cell invasion. Exosomes released by the primary ovarian tumor are small extracellular vesicles which prepare the distant tumor microenvironment for accelerated metastatic invasion. They regulate intercellular communication between tumor cells and normal stroma, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and local immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. In this review, we highlight the emerging roles of ovarian cancer exosomes as coordinators of pre-metastatic niche formation, biomarkers amenable to liquid biopsy, and targets of chemotherapy.

Keywords

Ovarian cancer Exosome Pre-metastatic niche Metastasis 

Abbreviations

ADSCs

Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells

AKT

Protein kinase B

ALIX/PDCD6IP

programmed cell death 6-interacting protein

ARF6

ADP-ribosylation factor 6

ATF2

Activating transcription factor 2

COIA1

Collagen alpha-1 (XVIII) chain

DCs

Dendritic cells

ECs

Endothelial cells

EOC

Epithelial ovarian cancer

EOC

Epithelial ovarian cancer

EPHA2

Ephrin type-A receptor 2

ESCRT

Endosomal sorting complex required for transport

FasL

Fas ligand

GD 3

Ganglioside 3

GNA12

Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-12

HEK293

Human embryonic kidney

HIF

Hypoxia-inducible factor

HPMC

Human peritoneal mesothelial cells

HPMCs

Human peritoneal mesothelial cells

HUVECs

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

HUVECs

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

ILV

Intraluminal vesicle

LIN28

Lin-28 homolog A

LPA

Lysophosphatidic acid

MMP

Matrix metallopeptidase

MSCs

Mesenchymal stem cells

MTA1

Metastasis-associated protein 1

MVEs

Multivesicular endosomes

NK

Natural killer

OC

Ovarian cancer

PBMCs

Peripheral blood lymphocytes

PI3K

Phosphoinositide 3-kinases

PS

Phosphatidylserine

RISCs

Coiled-Coil Containing Protein Kinase

RNA

Induced silencing complexes

ROCK

Rho-Associated

SDF-1

Stromal cell-derived factor 1

sE-cad

Soluble E-cadherin

SOCS

Suppress cytokine signaling

STAT3

Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

TAMs

Tumor-associated macrophages

TCR

T-cell receptor

TLR

Toll-like receptor

TSG101

Tumor susceptibility gene 101 protein

VPS4

Vacuolar protein sorting-associated protein

α-SMA

Alpha-smooth muscle actin

Highlights

  • Ovarian cancer is the deadliest gynecological malignancy, largely stemming from peritoneal metastasis. Formation of the pre-metastatic niche supports subsequent metastatic lesions.

  • Ovarian cancer derived exosomes induce pre-metastatic niche formation via immunosuppression, angiogenesis, stromal cell remodeling, and oncogenic reprogramming.

  • Ovarian cancer derived exosomes are promising biomarkers and therapeutic targets.

Background

Ovarian cancer is the most lethal gynecological malignancy, accounting for 2.5% of all female cancers and 5% of female cancer-related deaths [1]. In the United States, there were approximately 22,240 new cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed and 14,070 deaths in 2018 [2]. Ovarian cancer patients experience high mortality rates due to commonly being diagnosed during the late stage (III or IV) with bowel obstruction and systemic involvement [3]. The 5-year survival rate of ovarian cancer among these late-stage III or IV cases is less than 29%, as compared to 70% in early stage I cases [4]. There is, therefore, an urgent need to characterize the mechanisms of ovarian cancer metastasis and associated biomarkers in order to earlier diagnose and treat ovarian cancer patients within the stage I period.

Recent works have shown the pre-metastatic niche in ovarian cancer to be a prevalent precondition of metastasis [5]. The pre-metastatic niche is a preformed microenvironment made possible by exosomes secreted by the primary tumor site prior to widespread metastasis [6, 7, 8]. These exosomes optimize the environment for ovarian cancer colonization, outgrowth, and metastasis [9, 10]. This environment is mediated through immune suppression and evasion, angiogenesis, cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAF), and tumor macrophages that remodel the local stroma. Various studies have shown exosomes to play critical roles in tumorigenesis, growth, apoptosis, immune response, and chemotherapeutic resistance in cancer [11, 12, 13, 14, 15] (Fig. 1a). However, it was not until very recently that their roles in pre-metastatic niche establishment have been appreciated [15, 16]. Despite their diameter of 30–100 nm, these disk-shaped membranous vesicles contain unique signatures of proteins, lipids, DNA, and RNA making them powerful tumorigenic factors and diagnostic biomarkers [17]. In ovarian cancer, exosomes are detectable in both ascites and blood, making them amenable to less invasive diagnostics and a potential target of earlier targeted therapy [18, 19, 20]. In this review, we summarize the functions of exosomes in ovarian cancer metastasis with respect to pre-metastatic niche formation.
Fig. 1

a. The biogenesis of exosomes and the mechanisms involved in intercellular communication. The exosome is an intraluminal vesicle (ILV) formed by the inward budding of the endosomal membrane during the maturation of the multivesicular endosomes (MVEs) and then secreted after fusing with the cell surface. Uptake by recipient cells occurs via a three step processes: 1. membrane fusion with target cells; 2. endocytosis; 3. activation of surface receptors and signaling. b. Schematic diagram of the exosome. The exosome is a disk-shaped membranous vesicle with a diameter 30–100 nm, and carries a parental cell cargo including lipids, metabolites, proteins, nucleic acids (DNA fragments, mRNA, miRNA, etc.)

Exosome biogenesis

The nature and abundance of exosomes are dictated by their donor cell of origin — whether it be healthy tissue or tumor [21]. Exosome biogenesis involves a set sequence of cellular events which eventually render a carcinogenic or physiologic subtype. The donor cells first internalize extracellular ligands and products to form early endosomes. Nascent exosomes then arise as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) within the lumen of these endosomes, eventually maturing into multivesicular endosomes (MVEs) via selective inclusion of proteins, nucleic acids, and lipids. Whereas some MVEs fuse and degrade within lysosomes to provide the necessary energy and materials for cell formation, others are released into the extracellular environment through Golgi recirculation or direct cell secretion [22]. The endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) is a primary driver of membrane shaping and scission, and the first accepted mechanism of MVE and ILV formation [23]. The final exosomal cargo drives its eventual function, and is achieved by a highly selective series of regulatory stages. It involves endoprotein sorting and precise ESCT cleavage of ubiquitinated proteins into ILVs via ESCT-0, −I, −II, and -III as well as VPS4, VTA1, ALIX/PDCD6IP, and TSG101. Lipids such as ceramide, cholesterol, and the four-transmembrane protein superfamily including CD9, CD63, and CD81 also mediate exosome protein sorting. At the nucleic acid level, exosomal mRNAs are sorted into MVEs according to the Z-zipper structure of their 3′-UTR as well as through RNA-induced silencing complexes (RISCs) [24, 25]. An ARF6–Exportin-5 axis also delivers pre-miRNA cargo into tumor microvesicles [26]. These regulatory methods demonstrate the mechanism by which ovarian cancer exosomes obtain their distinct molecular signature from surrounding healthy tissue.

Ovarian cancer-exosomes

Ovarian cancer is distinguished from other human tumors by its preference for peritoneal cavity invasion through the ascites, making it especially adept at involving various viscera within the compartment. From the early stages on, the ascites contains detached tumor cells, various immune cells, mesothelial cells, and tumor associated exosomes. These exosomes can be isolated from the ascites [27, 28] and serum [29, 30] of patients with ovarian cancer. Importantly, these exosomes contain unique protein signatures specific to ovarian cancer, including membrane proteins (Alix, TSG 101), small GTPases (Rab proteins), annexin proteins, tetraspanins (CD9, CD82, CD63 and CD81), heat shock proteins (Hsp90, Hsc70), antigens (MHC I and II), Nanog and enzymes (phosphate isomerase, peroxiredoxin, aldehyde reductase, fatty acid synthase) (Fig. 1b). In addition to revealing an underlying malignancy, the exosomal protein cargo functions to enhance the progression of metastasis of ovarian tumors (Table 1). For example, Nanog is a transcription regulator involved in tumor cell proliferation and self-renewal of cancer stem cells [31]. Nanog expression is significantly greater in exosomes sampled from the ascites of high-grade serous ovarian cancer compared to benign peritoneal fluid [32]. Nanog knockout studies have shown decreased migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells [33].
Table 1

Summary of ovarian cancer exosomal proteins involved with metastasis

Exosomal Proteins

Recipient cells

Role/Mechanism

Reference

Proteomic analysis: 2230 proteins were identified

N/A

Tumorigenesis and metastasis

[34]

ATF2, MTA1, ROCK1/2

HUVECs

Angiogenesis

[35]

GNA12, EPHA2 and COIA1

MSCs and ECs

Promote MSC and EC migration for metastasis

[36]

CD44

HPMCs

Tumor cell invasion.

[37]

RNA-binding protein LIN28

HEK293 cells

Increase HEK293 cell invasion and migration

[38]

Nanog

N/A

Tumor cell proliferation and invasion

[32, 33]

Abbreviations: ATF2 Activating transcription factor 2, MTA1 Metastasis-associated protein 1, ROCK Rho-Associated, Coiled-Coil Containing Protein Kinase, HUVECs Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, GNA12 Guanine nucleotide-binding protein subunit alpha-12, EPHA2 ephrin type-A receptor 2, COIA1 Collagen alpha-1 (XVIII) chain, MSCs Mesenchymal stem cells, ECs endothelial cells, HPMCs Human peritoneal mesothelial cells, LIN28 Lin-28 homolog A, HEK293 human embryonic kidney

Tumorigenic microRNAs (miRNA) have also been identified within exosomes, where they are encapsulated and protected from nuclease degradation. Functionally, these intra-exosomal miRNAs regulate gene expression of target cells both locally and systemically. Once shed, the ovarian cancer derived exosomes horizontally transport their miRNAs to tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), mesothelial cells, and tumor cells themselves. They provide instructions for pre-metastatic niche formation and metastasis in the nascent stages of malignancy (Table 2).
Table 2

Summary of ovarian cancer exosomal miRNAs involved with metastasis

Exosomal miRNAs

Recipient cells

Role/Mechanism

Reference

miR-940, miR-222-3p,miR-21–3p, miR-125 b-5p, miR-181 d-5p

TAMs

M2 phenotype polarization, EOC proliferation and migration

[39, 40, 41]

miRNA 21 and 29a

ES2 OC cellsLP9 mesothelial cells

Mesothelial cell clearance

[42]

miR-99a-5p

HPMC

Cell invasion through fibronectin and vitronectin upregulation

[43]

MMP1 mRNAs

MeT-5A and HPMC

Destruction of peritoneal mesothelium barrier

[44]

let-7a-f and miR-200a-c

N/A

Correlates with ovarian cancer invasiveness

[45]

Abbreviations: TAMs Tumor-associated macrophages, HPMC Human peritoneal mesothelial cells, OC ovarian cancer, EOC Epithelial ovarian cancer, MMP Matrix metallopeptidase

Exosomes cause immunosuppression within the pre-metastatic niche

The immune system is a significant barrier to metastasis. For ovarian cancer to thrive in its new environment, it is therefore principally important for the premetastatic niche to protect the metastatic cells from being apoptosed upon entering the metastatic site. Exosomes isolated from the ascites of ovarian cancer can induce a rapid and reversible T cell arrest [17]. One recent study found GD3, a ganglioside expressed on the surface of exosomes isolated from ascites, to arrest T cells via acting on their T-cell receptor (TCR) [46]. Ovarian cancer associated exosomes can also induce the production of IL-6 within monocytes through toll-like receptor (TLR) activation. IL-6 then activates the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway in immune cells, stromal cells, and tumor cells, which supports overall immune escape of cancer cells [47] (Fig. 2a).
Fig. 2

Impact of ovarian cancer-exosomes on target cells during pre-metastatic niche formation. a. Ovarian cancer-exosomes induce apoptosis of dendritic cells, increase secretion of IL-6, and inhibit function of T cells and NK cells. b. Ovarian cancer-exosomes with their cargo, such as ATF2, MTA1, sE-cad, and CD147, which acts on human vein endothelial cells, inducing angiogenesis and vascular permeability. c. Ovarian cancer-exosomes convert fibroblasts to CAFs. d. Ovarian cancer-exosomes deliver miRNAs to macrophages and elicit M2 macrophage polarization by regulating the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)4/5/ STAT3 pathway in macrophages. e. Phenotypic conversion and apoptosis of PMCs, induced by ovarian cancer-exosomes, clears the mesothelial cell barrier of the peritoneum and omentum. OC ovarian cancer, NK natural killer, ATF2 Activating transcription factor 2, MTA1 Metastasis-associated protein 1, sE-cad soluble E-cadherin, SOCS Suppress cytokine signaling, STAT3 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, PMC Peritoneal mesothelial cell, CAF cancer-associated fibroblast

With the aim of revealing the direct effect of exosomes on immune cells, various works have cocultured exosomes from the ascites of ovarian cancer patients with dendritic cells, hematopoietic stem cells, and peripheral blood lymphocytes. One such study showed exosomes to cause immunosuppression by inducing apoptosis of hematopoietic stem cells, dendritic cells, and peripheral blood lymphocytes [27] (Fig. 2a). In another study, normal peripheral blood lymphocytes were cocultured with exosomes from ovarian cancer ascites or peritoneal washings of patients with benign ovarian cysts with follow up gene expression analysis of the lymphocytes. They found overexpression of 26 immunosuppressive genes in the malignant ascites cocultured group compared to the benign ovarian cyst group. These findings support the role of exosomes in dampening peripheral immunity through direct interaction with leukocytes, allowing for unmitigated tumor invasion [48].

Both the adaptive immune response, including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, as well as innate immune cells such as natural killer (NK) cells and macrophages, are strongly recruited to the metastatic site. These immune cells are potent physiologic defenses against tumor progression [49]. A growing body of evidence suggests exosomes derived from ovarian cancer cells can silence these immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and are critical in pre-metastatic niche formation [50, 51, 52]. In addition to reprogramming the immune cell gene profile, ovarian cancer cells release Fas ligand (FasL)-carrying exosomes which downregulate the expression of the surface T-cell receptor/CD3- zeta (ζ) and promote T-cell apoptosis [53, 54]. At the cellular level, lysophosphatidic acid elevates the expression of FasL on the surface of ovarian cancer cells, thus prompting the release of FasL-carrying exosomes [55]. In addition, ovarian cancer exosomes carry phosphatidylserine, which inhibits T-cell activation by blocking intracellular signaling cascades [56]. NK cells are prominent innate immune effector cells that recognize and kill tumor cells directly. The NKG2D receptor-ligand is a crucial activating cytotoxic receptor of NK cells and a target of ovarian cancer exosome downregulation. Inhibition of NKG2D circumvents NK cell cytotoxicity, allowing for immune evasion of tumor cells and a robust pre-metastatic niche [57] (Table 3) (Fig. 2a).
Table 3

Roles of ovarian cancer exosomes in pre-metastatic niche formation

Exosome Function

Origin of exosomes

Recipient cells

Effect

Potential targets

Ref.

Immunosuppression

Ascites of OC patients

T cells

Arrest T cells

GD3, TCR

[46]

Ascites of OC patients

Monocytes

Cytokine production

TLR signaling pathways

[47]

Ascites of OC patients

PBMCs and DCs

Apoptosis

FasL

[27]

Ascites of OC patients

T cells

Apoptosis

FasL

[54]

OC cells

T cells

Counterattack against activated T cells

LPA and FasL

[55]

Ovarian tumor tissues

T cells

T cell inhibition

Depletion or blockade of PS

[56]

EOC cells and ascites

NK cells

Cytotoxicity inhibition

NKG2D

[57]

Angiogenesis

OC cells

HUVECs

Affect VEGF or HIF-1α

ATF2 and MTA1

[58]

OC cells

HUVECs

CD147 stimulates VEGF expression

CD147

[59]

OC cells

HUVECs

Activate β-catenin and NF-κB signaling

sE-cad

[60]

Stroma remodeling

OC cells

ADSCs

Transition ADSCs to CAFs

α-SMA, SDF-1, TGF-β SMAD2 and PI3K/AKT pathway

[67]

OC cells

Macrophages

Macrophage M2 polarization

miR-21–3p, miR-125b-5p, and miR-181d-5p SOCS4/5/ STAT3 pathway

[41]

Abbreviations: OC ovarian cancer, GD 3 ganglioside 3, TCR T-cell receptor, TLR Toll-like receptor, PBMCs peripheral blood lymphocytes, DCs dendritic cells, FasL Fas ligand, LPA Lysophosphatidic acid, PS phosphatidylserine, EOC Epithelial ovarian cancer, NK natural killer, HIF Hypoxia-inducible factor, HUVECs Human umbilical vein endothelial cells, sE-cad soluble E-cadherin, ADSCs adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, α-SMA alpha-smooth muscle actin, SDF-1 stromal cell-derived factor 1, PI3K Phosphoinositide 3-kinases, AKT Protein kinase B, SOCS Suppress cytokine signaling, STAT3 Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3

Exosomes promote angiogenesis in the pre-metastatic niche

To ensure adequate blood supply, VEGFR1+ hematopoietic progenitor cells initiate angiogenesis within the pre-metastatic niche [9]. Additionally, local endothelial progenitor cells promote angiogenesis via VEGF signaling [52]. Aside from blood vessel growth, the proangiogenic microenvironment increases vascular permeability towards the pre-metastatic niche for multiple cell types, including VEGFR1+ hematopoietic progenitor cells, immune cells, stromal cells, and the homing of tumor cells [52]. This antecedent angiogenesis makes the pre-metastatic niche capable of meeting the nutrient requirements for subsequent rapid metastatic growth. Ovarian cancer exosomes have recently gained notoriety for promoting angiogenesis (Fig. 2b). One such study demonstrated their ability to enhance viability and migration of human umbilical vein endothelial cells. At the molecular level, proteomics have revealed activating transcription factor 2 (ATF2) and metastasis-associated protein 1 (MTA1) housed within ovarian cancer exosomes to upregulate angiogenesis [58]. CD147 is a tumorigenic membrane-bound molecule expressed in cancer cells which regulates matrix metalloproteinase expression in peritumoral stromal cells. CD147-positive exosomes released by ovarian tumors promote angiogenesis in human umbilical vein endothelial cells as well [59]. In a uniquely VEGF-independent manner, soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad) harboring exosomes are present within the ascites of ovarian cancer patients and are robust activators of angiogenesis. Mechanistically, sE-cad-positive exosomes bind with VE-cadherin on endothelial cells, prompting a signaling cascade that ultimately activates β-catenin and NF-κB; this stimulates endothelial cell migration and overall vascular permeability [60]. Despite their small size, a growing body of research is supporting the role of ovarian cancer derived exosomes in cultivating an angiogenic tumor niche for widespread peritoneal metastasis.

Exosomes in stromal remodeling

The survival of cancer cells that metastasize from primary tumors to secondary sites depends upon the stroma microenvironment. Tumor derived exosomes assist in this process by educating and remodeling stromal cells in the metastatic site to support tumor cell viability and metastatic dissemination. Functionally, they reprogram stromal cells in the pre-metastatic niche including cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) and pericytes. Exosomes also interact with tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) in the metastatic microenvironment, which are responsible for tumor growth, invasion, angiogenesis, and overall metastasis.

Exosomes convert fibroblasts to CAFs

CAFs are unique, reprogrammed stromal cells with roles in cancer initiation, extracellular matrix remodeling, progression, pre-metastatic niche formation, and metastasis [61]. They secrete a tumorigenic cytokine milieu of TGF-β, stromal cell-derived factor-1α (SDF-1α), S100A4, fibronectin, and matrix metalloproteinases in the local stromal cell microenvironment [62, 63]. While these signaling molecules have unique and specific processes in forming the tumor microenvironment, they all contribute to stromal remodeling within the pre-metastatic niche [62, 64]. In a study where the miRNA profile between normal fibroblasts and ovarian tumor-adjacent fibroblasts were compared, ovarian tumor-adjacent fibroblasts consistently showed miR-31 and miR-214 downregulation with miR-155 upregulation. These researchers demonstrated the significance of this miRNA signature by transfecting miR-31 and miR-214 mimics or miR-155 inhibitors into normal fibroblasts, which caused them to convert to CAFs [65]. This showed ovarian cancer derived exosomes alone are sufficient to induce the phenotypic and functional changes in normal stromal fibroblasts to pathogenic CAFs [66] (Fig. 2c). Similar work has supported the role of exosomes in transitioning normal stroma to CAFs. Ovarian cancer is able to transition adipose derived mesenchymal stem cells to CAFs by overexpressing alpha-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), SDF-1 and TGF-β [67]. Reprogramming of normal stroma to cancerous stroma can therefore be mediated by cytokine signaling from exosomes prior to secondary metastatic growth.

Exosomes induce macrophage polarization

Macrophages are multifunctional antigen presenting cells classically categorized into two polarized phenotypes: pro-inflammatory (M1) and anti-inflammatory (M2) [68]. Tumor associate-macrophages (TAMs) are of the M2 subtype and permeate malignant tissues [69]. Within the tumor microenvironment, TAMs secrete IL-4, IL-5, and IL-6, which promote angiogenesis, matrix remodeling, and immune system suppression [70]. They also contribute to the pre-metastatic niche by secreting TGF-β, SDF-1, and VEGF via the STAT3 signaling cascade [71]. In ovarian cancer, hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) induce the release of exosomes enriched with various miRNAs, including miR-21–3p, miR-125 b-5p, and miR-181 d-5p. When these exosomes are phagocytosed by undifferentiated macrophages, they undergo M2 polarization via the suppressor of cytokine signaling (SOCS)4/5/ STAT3 pathway [41] (Fig. 2d). One recent study showed ovarian cancer cells co-cultured with macrophages are only capable of transferring their oncogenic miR-1246 via exosomes to M2 macrophages and not to M1 macrophages. As a follow up, a combination miR-1246 inhibitor and chemotherapy regimen significantly reduced tumor burden in vivo [72]. These emerging works have supported the role of directing the M2 subtype at multiple stages of tumorigenesis and pre-metastatic niche formation.

Exosome-educated cells in the pre-metastatic niche promote metastasis

Ovarian cancer exosomes directly promote circulating tumor cell homing, colonization, and outgrowth within the premetastatic niche while suppressing the host anti-tumor immune response. They also enable tumor cell proliferation and invasion by encouraging host cell transformation to TAM and CAF phenotypes (Table 3). Experimental evidence has shown exosome-educated TAMs to enhance ovarian cancer proliferation and migration in vitro and with in vivo mouse models [41]. This occurs as a result of the cytokine profile of TAMs, whereby they secrete large amounts of EGF which activate EGFR in peripheral ovarian cancer cells. This EGF/EGFR signaling cascade upregulates vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C), which in turn upregulates integrin and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1). This induces proliferation, migration, adhesion, spheroid formation, and peritoneal implantation of ovarian cancer cells [73] (Fig. 3b). In the pre-metastatic niche, the tumor derived exosomes convert local fibroblasts into CAFs, which support tumorigenesis through their own exosome secretion. When ovarian cancer cells ingest TGFβ1-enriched CAF-exosomes, they upregulate TGFβ1 expression and become more adept at migration and invasion via a SMAD signaling cascade [74]. Aside from this function, CAFs also enhance basement membrane permeability allowing tumor cells to better invade the local uninvolved stroma [75].
Fig. 3

Two main methods of ovarian cancer metastasis within the peritoneal cavity, direct implantation and hematogenous spread. a Distribution of ovarian cancer nests in the peritoneal cavity. b Mechanisms of ovarian cancer-exosome establishment of the pre-metastatic niche before metastasis. c After the formation of pre-metastatic niche, tumor cells home to the metastatic site then colonize and support vessel budding. OC: ovarian cancer; NK: natural killer; HUVECs: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells; TAM: tumor-associated macrophages; PMC: Peritoneal mesothelial cell; CAF: cancer-associated fibroblasts.

There is a unique interplay between chemotherapeutic and exosome function. Intriguingly, it was recently shown that breast cancer exosomes have enhanced pre-metastatic niche forming ability in the lung after a chemotherapy application [76]. In another study, researchers showed the first-line chemotherapeutic cisplatin to increase IL-6-producing myofibroblastic CAFs in ovarian cancer patients by activating the NFκB signaling pathway [77]. Furthermore, they demonstrated pretreatment with the well-known diabetes drug metformin arrested stromal NFκB/IL6 activation and lessened the chemoresistance response in ovarian cancer cells [77]. Metastatic and drug-resistant, recurrent ovarian cancer produces significantly higher IL-6 compared to matched primary tumors. When elevated, IL-6 within the ascites of ovarian cancer patients correlates with poor outcomes [78, 79, 80, 81]. Overall, current works are investigating IL-6 receptor antagonists, classically used to treat rheumatoid arthritis, for their potential anti-cancer effects [82].

Exosomes breach the barriers to tumor invasion within the pre-metastatic niche

Approximately 70% of ovarian cancer patients have peritoneal metastasis at the time of surgery [83]. Typically, nests of tumor cells involve the peritoneum, omentum, mesentery, diaphragm, and surface of abdominopelvic viscera (Fig. 3a). These niduses of metastasis result from transport within the ascites; however, cases of hematogenous metastasis to the omentum also occur [84] (Fig. 3a). Histologically, both the omentum and peritoneum are loose collagen networks with vascularized connective tissue, scattered fibroblasts, adipocytes, and macrophages. They are covered by a single layer of microvilli-rich mesothelial cells and a thin basement membrane [85](Fig. 3b), which the circulating ovarian cancer cells must breach. The method of metastatic transport determines the barriers to invasion. In the hematogenous pathway, tumor cells penetrate surface endothelium, and, in the ascites pathway, they infiltrate the mesothelium (Fig. 3c).

Ovarian cancer exosomes advance angiogenesis by inducing vascular endothelial cell migration, which facilitates tumor cell homing to the pre-metastatic niche [58, 59, 60]. The notable absence of mesothelium in peritoneal viscera with metastatic growth suggests these cells are cleared during tumorigenesis, and possibly prior to large-scale metastatic invasion [86, 87, 88]. Mechanistically, ovarian cancer cells release exosomes with specific miRNAs (e.g miR-21 and miR-29a) into the ascites that remodel the mesothelial cell layer for enhanced peritoneal penetration [42] (Fig. 2e). Serum miR-99a-5p is significantly elevated in ovarian cancer patients and promotes cell invasion by affecting human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMCs) via fibronectin and vitronectin upregulation [43]. CD44 is overexpressed in the peritoneal mesothelial cells of ovarian cancer patients with omental metastasis. This occurs via an exosome conditioned pathway, whereby ovarian cancer exosomes transfer CD44 to peritoneal mesothelium causing its physical barrier to be cleared [37]. MMP1 expression is a negative factor of ovarian cancer prognosis. The mRNA of these proteases are horizontally transferred from ovarian cancer exosomes to peritoneal mesothelium, causing apoptosis of the peritoneal mesothelium through self-destruction [44].

Exosomes as pre-metastatic niche biomarkers and therapeutic applications

Early detection of the pre-metastatic niche prior to metastasis remains an important goal within the field of gynecologic oncology, especially given the substantially worse outcomes associated with late stage diagnosis. Therefore, new techniques have sought to detect hyperpermeable, hypoxic, and inflammatory areas in addition to areas with altered extracellular matrix profiles characteristic of the metastatic niche. However, many of these techniques have low accuracy and are not yet suitable for clinical application [89, 90, 91]. Exosomes possess several unique advantages as biomarkers of pre-metastatic niche formation, as they are extremely stable, abundant, and tumor-specific. They are, therefore, promising biomarkers within the blood or ascites that warrant serious investigation in this deadly cancer, especially given their successes in other cancers [92]. For example, exosomes derived from pancreatic tumors bearing migration inhibitory factor (MIF) are selectively ingested by Kupffer cells within the liver, and therefore serve as important initiating factors in hepatic pre-metastatic niche formation [93]. Similarly, exosomal levels of the melanoma-specific protein tyrosinase-related protein 2 (TYRP2) has gained interest as a predictor of metastasis in melanoma [94].

Liquid biopsy is a technique where circulating tumor cells, cell-free nucleic acids, and tumor-derived exosomes can be analyzed from body fluids such as blood or ascites. The first exosome-based cancer diagnostic product was introduced to market within the United States on January 21, 2016 [95]. This technique is especially applicable to ovarian cancer diagnostics, as exosomes can be readily detected from ascites in a relatively non-invasive manner [96]. The most advanced biosensors in liquid biopsy detect cancer-derived exosomes via highly specific target selection, biologic antigen sensing, and signal transduction techniques [97]. As to target selection, levels of exosomal miR-200b and miR-200c are associated with poor outcomes in ovarian cancer and significantly correlate with the ovarian tumor marker CA-125 [98]. Cancer-related antigens are prominent on the surface of exosomes and amenable to highly sensitive cancer cell detection. Examples include exosomes enriched with VEGF-A, semaphorin-3A, and TGF-beta in glioma (GBMs), HIF1-α in nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and MT1 MMP in fibrosarcoma and melanoma [22]. These proteins associated with exosomes are unique to their cancer of origin, and therefore promising targets of liquid biopsy detection especially for patients with an unknown cancer subtype. To this effect, various malignancies have been studied including melanoma, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, and ovarian cancer [97]. Very recently, a microfluidic chip-based liquid biopsy was able to isolate exosomes with detailed protein and signaling pathway profiles in ovarian cancer [99].

Therapeutic exosome-based strategies are also emerging, and function by exploiting the homing effect of exosomes on primary cancer cells [100]. A pre-metastatic niche mimic was generated by embedding ovarian cancer-exosomes into engineered biomaterials and implanted within the abdominal cavity of a murine model. This artificial pre-metastatic niche effectively recruited and trapped free ovarian cancer cells from the ascites, thus preventing these cells from homing towards normal pelvic viscera. Survival was substantially increased [101]. Another emerging technology utilizes cell-targeting aptamer-modified extracellular vesicles with exosomes embedded in black phosphorus. While the aptamer directs the bioinspired extracellular vesicles towards targeted cells, the black phosphorous derived inorganic phosphate facilitates cell biomineralization [102]. This targeted technology has potential for elimination of the pre-metastatic niche and is a novel area of future chemotherapeutic research.

Tumor-derived exosomes undergo homing to preferred organ and cell-specific sites when preparing the pre-metastatic niche. Exosomal proteomics have revealed expression patterns of integrins to play a major role in this process. While the exosomal integrins α6β4 and α6β1 promote lung metastasis, αvβ5 is linked to liver metastasis. Therapeutically, targeting integrins α6β4 and αvβ5 reduces exosome uptake and lung and liver metastasis, respectively [103]. These exosomal integrins are an additional predictor of pre-metastatic niche formation in liquid biopsy, and especially valuable for cancers with high rates of metastasis. Overall, because different cancers exhibit distinct mechanisms and exosome profiles in their respective pre-metastatic niches [93, 103, 104], it is likely that tumor specific biomarkers and therapeutic strategies will have acceptable specificity. In addition, given the pre-metastatic biomarker profile housed within ovarian cancer exosomes and their roles in pre-metastatic niche formation, recent advances in liquid biopsy diagnostics have made exosomes a promising new area of early screening and detection (Table 3).

Conclusions and perspectives

Ovarian cancer exosomes promote pre-metastatic niche formation via immunosuppression, angiogenesis, stromal cell remodeling, and oncogenic reprogramming (Fig. 2). Since the pre-metastatic niche gained critical attention in 2005 [9], significant progress has been made in understanding the contribution of exosomes in conditioning the pre-metastatic niche for subsequent rapid metastatic growth. However, the roles of cell-shed exosomes have only recently been appreciated for their substantial effects on shaping the tumor microenvironment. In the preclinical work to date, exosomes in animal studies have been isolated and purified in vitro. Emerging technologies such as liquid biopsy will likely further characterize their tumorigenic effects in vivo, and may help to fully reveal the clinical significance of these pro-metastatic factors in ovarian cancer.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University and the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA for their excellent technical assistance.

Authors’ contributions

WLF was a major writer of the manuscript, and designed the figures, tables, researched appropriate references. ZFD and HRS developed the structure of the article and guided the selection of references. DC.D and FJ.H were responsible for language modification. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

WLF is supported by an overseas visiting scholarship from the Zhengzhou University of China. ZFD is supported, in part, through a Grant from Sarcoma Foundation of America (SFA) (222433), and a Grant from National Cancer Institute (NCI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH), UO1, CA151452–01.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

All the authors have approved the final manuscript for publication.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. 1.
    Howlader N NA, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K, Kosary CL, Yu M, Ruhl J, Tatalovich Z, Mariotto A, Lewis DR, Chen HS, Feuer EJ, Cronin KA (eds). Statistics Review, 1975-2014, National Cancer Institute. 2018.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Torre LA, Trabert B, DeSantis CE, Miller KD, Samimi G, Runowicz CD, Gaudet MM, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Ovarian cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:284–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Jayson GC, Kohn EC, Kitchener HC, Ledermann JA. Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2014;384:1376–88.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2018. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68:7–30.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lee W, Ko SY, Mohamed MS, Kenny HA, Lengyel E, Naora H. Neutrophils facilitate ovarian cancer premetastatic niche formation in the omentum. J Exp Med. 2019;216:176–94.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li K, Chen Y, Li A, Tan C, Liu X. Exosomes play roles in sequential processes of tumor metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2019;144:1486–95.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mashouri L, Yousefi H, Aref AR, Ahadi AM, Molaei F, Alahari SK. Exosomes: composition, biogenesis, and mechanisms in cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:75.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu Z, Zhao S, Ren L, Wang L, Chen Z, Hoffman RM, Zhou J. Pancreatic cancer-derived exosomes promote tumor metastasis and liver pre-metastatic niche formation. Oncotarget. 2017;8:63461–83.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kaplan RN, Riba RD, Zacharoulis S, Bramley AH, Vincent L, Costa C, MacDonald DD, Jin DK, Shido K, Kerns SA, et al. VEGFR1-positive haematopoietic bone marrow progenitors initiate the pre-metastatic niche. Nature. 2005;438:820–7.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Psaila B, Lyden D. The metastatic niche: adapting the foreign soil. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:285–93.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Melo SA, Sugimoto H, O'Connell JT, Kato N, Villanueva A, Vidal A, Qiu L, Vitkin E, Perelman LT, Melo CA, et al. Cancer exosomes perform cell-independent microRNA biogenesis and promote tumorigenesis. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:707–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rivoltini L, Chiodoni C, Squarcina P, Tortoreto M, Villa A, Vergani B, Burdek M, Botti L, Arioli I, Cova A, et al. TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)-armed exosomes deliver Proapoptotic signals to tumor site. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22:3499–512.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ye SB, Li ZL, Luo DH, Huang BJ, Chen YS, Zhang XS, Cui J, Zeng YX, Li J. Tumor-derived exosomes promote tumor progression and T-cell dysfunction through the regulation of enriched exosomal microRNAs in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2014;5:5439–52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Au Yeung CL, Co NN, Tsuruga T, Yeung TL, Kwan SY, Leung CS, Li Y, Lu ES, Kwan K, Wong KK, et al. Exosomal transfer of stroma-derived miR21 confers paclitaxel resistance in ovarian cancer cells through targeting APAF1. Nat Commun. 2016;7:11150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lobb RJ, Lima LG, Moller A. Exosomes: key mediators of metastasis and pre-metastatic niche formation. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2017;67:3–10.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guo Y, Ji X, Liu J, Fan D, Zhou Q, Chen C, Wang W, Wang G, Wang H, Yuan W, et al. Effects of exosomes on pre-metastatic niche formation in tumors. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:39.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Whiteside TL. Exosomes and tumor-mediated immune suppression. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1216–23.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tang MK, Wong AS. Exosomes: emerging biomarkers and targets for ovarian cancer. Cancer Lett. 2015;367:26–33.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dorayappan KDP, Wallbillich JJ, Cohn DE, Selvendiran K. The biological significance and clinical applications of exosomes in ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142:199–205.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nawaz M, Fatima F, Nazarenko I, Ekstrom K, Murtaza I, Anees M, Sultan A, Neder L, Camussi G, Valadi H, et al. Extracellular vesicles in ovarian cancer: applications to tumor biology, immunotherapy and biomarker discovery. Expert Rev Proteomics. 2016;13:395–409.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    van Niel G, D'Angelo G, Raposo G. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2018;19:213–28.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xu J, Liao K, Zhou W. Exosomes regulate the transformation of Cancer cells in Cancer stem cell homeostasis. Stem Cells Int. 2018;2018:4837370.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hurley JH. ESCRT complexes and the biogenesis of multivesicular bodies. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2008;20:4–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pegtel DM, Gould SJ. Exosomes. Annu Rev Biochem. 2019;88:487–514.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Azmi AS, Bao B, Sarkar FH. Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and drug resistance: a comprehensive review. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2013;32:623–42.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Clancy JW, Zhang Y, Sheehan C, D'Souza-Schorey C. An ARF6-Exportin-5 axis delivers pre-miRNA cargo to tumour microvesicles. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21:856–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Peng P, Yan Y, Keng S. Exosomes in the ascites of ovarian cancer patients: origin and effects on anti-tumor immunity. Oncol Rep. 2011;25:749–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Runz S, Keller S, Rupp C, Stoeck A, Issa Y, Koensgen D, Mustea A, Sehouli J, Kristiansen G, Altevogt P. Malignant ascites-derived exosomes of ovarian carcinoma patients contain CD24 and EpCAM. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;107:563–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. MicroRNA signatures of tumor-derived exosomes as diagnostic biomarkers of ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110:13–21.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C, Parker LP. Patient-derived tumor-reactive antibodies as diagnostic markers for ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;115:112–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gong S, Li Q, Jeter CR, Fan Q, Tang DG, Liu B. Regulation of NANOG in cancer cells. Mol Carcinog. 2015;54:679–87.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Yamamoto CM, Oakes ML, Murakami T, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Ng SW. Comparison of benign peritoneal fluid- and ovarian cancer ascites-derived extracellular vesicle RNA biomarkers. J Ovarian Res. 2018;11:20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sherman-Samis M, Onallah H, Holth A, Reich R, Davidson B. SOX2 and SOX9 are markers of clinically aggressive disease in metastatic high-grade serous carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2019.153(3):651–660.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liang B, Peng P, Chen S, Li L, Zhang M, Cao D, Yang J, Li H, Gui T, Li X, Shen K. Characterization and proteomic analysis of ovarian cancer-derived exosomes. J Proteome. 2013;80:171–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yi H, Ye J, Yang X-M, Zhang L-W, Zhang Z-G, Chen Y-P. High-grade ovarian cancer secreting effective exosomes in tumor angiogenesis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(5):5062–5070.Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sharma S, Alharbi M, Kobayashi M, Lai A, Guanzon D, Zuniga F, Ormazabal V, Palma C, Scholz-Romero K, Rice GE, et al. Proteomic analysis of exosomes reveals an association between cell invasiveness and exosomal bioactivity on endothelial and mesenchymal cell migration in vitro. Clin Sci (Lond). 2018;132:2029–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nakamura K, Sawada K, Kinose Y, Yoshimura A, Toda A, Nakatsuka E, Hashimoto K, Mabuchi S, Morishige KI, Kurachi H, et al. Exosomes promote ovarian Cancer cell invasion through transfer of CD44 to peritoneal mesothelial cells. Mol Cancer Res. 2017;15:78–92.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Enriquez VA, Cleys ER, Da Silveira JC, Spillman MA, Winger QA, Bouma GJ. High LIN28A expressing ovarian Cancer cells secrete exosomes that induce invasion and migration in HEK293 cells. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:701390.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Chen X, Ying X, Wang X, Wu X, Zhu Q, Wang X. Exosomes derived from hypoxic epithelial ovarian cancer deliver microRNA-940 to induce macrophage M2 polarization. Oncol Rep. 2017;38:522–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ying X, Wu Q, Wu X, Zhu Q, Wang X, Jiang L, Chen X, Wang X. Epithelial ovarian cancer-secreted exosomal miR-222-3p induces polarization of tumor-associated macrophages. Oncotarget. 2016;7:43076–87.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Chen X, Zhou J, Li X, Wang X, Lin Y, Wang X. Exosomes derived from hypoxic epithelial ovarian cancer cells deliver microRNAs to macrophages and elicit a tumor-promoted phenotype. Cancer Lett. 2018;435:80–91.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vaksman O, Trope C, Davidson B, Reich R. Exosome-derived miRNAs and ovarian carcinoma progression. Carcinogenesis. 2014;35:2113–20.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Yoshimura A, Sawada K, Nakamura K, Kinose Y, Nakatsuka E, Kobayashi M, Miyamoto M, Ishida K, Matsumoto Y, Kodama M, et al. Exosomal miR-99a-5p is elevated in sera of ovarian cancer patients and promotes cancer cell invasion by increasing fibronectin and vitronectin expression in neighboring peritoneal mesothelial cells. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:1065.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Yokoi A, Yoshioka Y, Yamamoto Y, Ishikawa M, Ikeda SI, Kato T, Kiyono T, Takeshita F, Kajiyama H, Kikkawa F, Ochiya T. Malignant extracellular vesicles carrying MMP1 mRNA facilitate peritoneal dissemination in ovarian cancer. Nat Commun. 2017;8:14470.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Kobayashi M, Salomon C, Tapia J, Illanes SE, Mitchell MD, Rice GE. Ovarian cancer cell invasiveness is associated with discordant exosomal sequestration of Let-7 miRNA and miR-200. J Transl Med. 2014;12:4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Shenoy GN, Loyall J, Berenson CS, Kelleher RJ Jr, Iyer V, Balu-Iyer SV, Odunsi K, Bankert RB. Sialic acid-dependent inhibition of T cells by Exosomal ganglioside GD3 in ovarian tumor microenvironments. J Immunol. 2018;201:3750–8.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Bretz NP, Ridinger J, Rupp AK, Rimbach K, Keller S, Rupp C, Marme F, Umansky L, Umansky V, Eigenbrod T, et al. Body fluid exosomes promote secretion of inflammatory cytokines in monocytic cells via toll-like receptor signaling. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:36691–702.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Li Y, Yang Y, Xiong A, Wu X, Xie J, Han S, Zhao S. Comparative gene expression analysis of lymphocytes treated with exosomes derived from ovarian Cancer and ovarian cysts. Front Immunol. 2017;8:607.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Vesely MD, Schreiber RD. Cancer immunoediting: antigens, mechanisms, and implications to cancer immunotherapy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013;1284:1–5.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Aguado BA, Bushnell GG, Rao SS, Jeruss JS, Shea LD. Engineering the pre-metastatic niche. Nat Biomed Eng. 2017;1:0077.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41551-017-0077.
  51. 51.
    Filipazzi P, Burdek M, Villa A, Rivoltini L, Huber V. Recent advances on the role of tumor exosomes in immunosuppression and disease progression. Semin Cancer Biol. 2012;22:342–9.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Liu Y, Cao X. Characteristics and significance of the pre-metastatic niche. Cancer Cell. 2016;30:668–81.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C, Lyons KS, Stanson J, Whiteside TL. T-cell apoptosis and suppression of T-cell receptor/CD3-zeta by Fas ligand-containing membrane vesicles shed from ovarian tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:5113–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Taylor DD, Gercel-Taylor C. Tumour-derived exosomes and their role in cancer-associated T-cell signalling defects. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:305–11.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Meng Y, Kang S, Fishman DA. Lysophosphatidic acid stimulates fas ligand microvesicle release from ovarian cancer cells. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2005;54:807–14.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kelleher RJ Jr, Balu-Iyer S, Loyall J, Sacca AJ, Shenoy GN, Peng P, Iyer V, Fathallah AM, Berenson CS, Wallace PK, et al. Extracellular vesicles present in human ovarian tumor microenvironments induce a phosphatidylserine-dependent arrest in the T-cell signaling Cascade. Cancer Immunol Res. 2015;3:1269–78.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Labani-Motlagh A, Israelsson P, Ottander U, Lundin E, Nagaev I, Nagaeva O, Dehlin E, Baranov V, Mincheva-Nilsson L. Differential expression of ligands for NKG2D and DNAM-1 receptors by epithelial ovarian cancer-derived exosomes and its influence on NK cell cytotoxicity. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:5455–66.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Yi H, Ye J, Yang XM, Zhang LW, Zhang ZG, Chen YP. High-grade ovarian cancer secreting effective exosomes in tumor angiogenesis. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8:5062–70.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Millimaggi D, Mari M, D'Ascenzo S, Carosa E, Jannini EA, Zucker S, Carta G, Pavan A, Dolo V. Tumor vesicle-associated CD147 modulates the angiogenic capability of endothelial cells. Neoplasia. 2007;9:349–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tang MKS, Yue PYK, Ip PP, Huang RL, Lai HC, Cheung ANY, Tse KY, Ngan HYS, Wong AST. Soluble E-cadherin promotes tumor angiogenesis and localizes to exosome surface. Nat Commun. 2018;9:2270.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Ishii G, Ochiai A, Neri S. Phenotypic and functional heterogeneity of cancer-associated fibroblast within the tumor microenvironment. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99:186–96.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Sleeman JP. The metastatic niche and stromal progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2012;31:429–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Schauer IG, Sood AK, Mok S, Liu J. Cancer-associated fibroblasts and their putative role in potentiating the initiation and development of epithelial ovarian cancer. Neoplasia. 2011;13:393–405.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Yamamura Y, Asai N, Enomoto A, Kato T, Mii S, Kondo Y, Ushida K, Niimi K, Tsunoda N, Nagino M, et al. Akt-Girdin signaling in cancer-associated fibroblasts contributes to tumor progression. Cancer Res. 2015;75:813–23.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Mitra AK, Zillhardt M, Hua Y, Tiwari P, Murmann AE, Peter ME, Lengyel E. MicroRNAs reprogram normal fibroblasts into cancer-associated fibroblasts in ovarian cancer. Cancer Discov. 2012;2:1100–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Giusti I, Di Francesco M, D'Ascenzo S, Palmerini MG, Macchiarelli G, Carta G, Dolo V. Ovarian cancer-derived extracellular vesicles affect normal human fibroblast behavior. Cancer Biol Ther. 2018;19:722–34.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Cho JA, Park H, Lim EH, Kim KH, Choi JS, Lee JH, Shin JW, Lee KW. Exosomes from ovarian cancer cells induce adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells to acquire the physical and functional characteristics of tumor-supporting myofibroblasts. Gynecol Oncol. 2011;123:379–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Pollard JW. Trophic macrophages in development and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 2009;9:259–70.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mantovani A, Sozzani S, Locati M, Allavena P, Sica A. Macrophage polarization: tumor-associated macrophages as a paradigm for polarized M2 mononuclear phagocytes. Trends Immunol. 2002;23:549–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Sica A, Larghi P, Mancino A, Rubino L, Porta C, Totaro MG, Rimoldi M, Biswas SK, Allavena P, Mantovani A. Macrophage polarization in tumour progression. Semin Cancer Biol. Elsevier; 2008;(5):349–55.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Chen XW, Yu TJ, Zhang J, Li Y, Chen HL, Yang GF, Yu W, Liu YZ, Liu XX, Duan CF, et al. CYP4A in tumor-associated macrophages promotes pre-metastatic niche formation and metastasis. Oncogene. 2017;36:5045–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Kanlikilicer P, Bayraktar R, Denizli M, Rashed MH, Ivan C, Aslan B, Mitra R, Karagoz K, Bayraktar E, Zhang X, et al. Exosomal miRNA confers chemo resistance via targeting Cav1/p-gp/M2-type macrophage axis in ovarian cancer. EBioMedicine. 2018;38:100–12.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Yin M, Li X, Tan S, Zhou HJ, Ji W, Bellone S, Xu X, Zhang H, Santin AD, Lou G, Min W. Tumor-associated macrophages drive spheroid formation during early transcoelomic metastasis of ovarian cancer. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:4157–73.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Li W, Zhang X, Wang J, Li M, Cao C, Tan J, Ma D, Gao Q. TGFbeta1 in fibroblasts-derived exosomes promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition of ovarian cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8:96035–47.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Glentis A, Oertle P, Mariani P, Chikina A, El Marjou F, Attieh Y, Zaccarini F, Lae M, Loew D, Dingli F, et al. Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce metalloprotease-independent cancer cell invasion of the basement membrane. Nat Commun. 2017;8:924.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Keklikoglou I, Cianciaruso C, Guc E, Squadrito ML, Spring LM, Tazzyman S, Lambein L, Poissonnier A, Ferraro GB, Baer C, et al. Chemotherapy elicits pro-metastatic extracellular vesicles in breast cancer models. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(2):190–202.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Xu S, Yang Z, Jin P, Yang X, Li X, Wei X, Wang Y, Long S, Zhang T, Chen G, et al. Metformin suppresses tumor progression by inactivating stromal fibroblasts in ovarian Cancer. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1291–302.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Duan Z, Feller AJ, Penson RT, Chabner BA, Seiden MV. Discovery of differentially expressed genes associated with paclitaxel resistance using cDNA array technology: analysis of interleukin (IL) 6, IL-8, and monocyte chemotactic protein 1 in the paclitaxel-resistant phenotype. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:3445–53.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Duan Z, Foster R, Bell DA, Mahoney J, Wolak K, Vaidya A, Hampel C, Lee H, Seiden MV. Signal transducers and activators of transcription 3 pathway activation in drug-resistant ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006;12:5055–63.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Penson RT, Kronish K, Duan Z, Feller AJ, Stark P, Cook SE, Duska LR, Fuller AF, Goodman AK, Nikrui N, et al. Cytokines IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, GM-CSF and TNFalpha in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer and their relationship to treatment with paclitaxel. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2000;10:33–41.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Guo Y, Nemeth J, O'Brien C, Susa M, Liu X, Zhang Z, Choy E, Mankin H, Hornicek F, Duan Z. Effects of siltuximab on the IL-6-induced signaling pathway in ovarian cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:5759–69.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Yoshida GJ, Azuma A, Miura Y, Orimo A. Activated fibroblast program orchestrates tumor initiation and progression; molecular mechanisms and the associated therapeutic strategies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20.PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Tan DS, Agarwal R, Kaye SB. Mechanisms of transcoelomic metastasis in ovarian cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:925–34.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Pradeep S, Kim SW, Wu SY, Nishimura M, Chaluvally-Raghavan P, Miyake T, Pecot CV, Kim SJ, Choi HJ, Bischoff FZ, et al. Hematogenous metastasis of ovarian cancer: rethinking mode of spread. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:77–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Brady M, Mahoney E. In: Doherty GM, editor. Peritoneal cavity. In CURRENT Diagnosis & Treatment: Surgery, 14e. McGraw-Hill Education: New York; 2015.Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kenny HA, Nieman KM, Mitra AK, Lengyel E. The first line of intra-abdominal metastatic attack: breaching the mesothelial cell layer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:100–2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Davidowitz RA, Selfors LM, Iwanicki MP, Elias KM, Karst A, Piao H, Ince TA, Drage MG, Dering J, Konecny GE, et al. Mesenchymal gene program-expressing ovarian cancer spheroids exhibit enhanced mesothelial clearance. J Clin Invest. 2014;124:2611–25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Iwanicki MP, Davidowitz RA, Ng MR, Besser A, Muranen T, Merritt M, Danuser G, Ince TA, Brugge JS. Ovarian cancer spheroids use myosin-generated force to clear the mesothelium. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:144–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Shokeen M, Zheleznyak A, Wilson JM, Jiang M, Liu R, Ferdani R, Lam KS, Schwarz JK, Anderson CJ. Molecular imaging of very late antigen-4 (alpha4beta1 integrin) in the premetastatic niche. J Nucl Med. 2012;53:779–86.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Soodgupta D, Hurchla MA, Jiang M, Zheleznyak A, Weilbaecher KN, Anderson CJ, Tomasson MH, Shokeen M. Very late antigen-4 (alpha(4)beta(1) integrin) targeted PET imaging of multiple myeloma. PLoS One. 2013;8:e55841.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hu L, Wickline SA, Hood JL. Magnetic resonance imaging of melanoma exosomes in lymph nodes. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74:266–71.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kalluri R. The biology and function of exosomes in cancer. J Clin Invest. 2016;126:1208–15.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Costa-Silva B, Aiello NM, Ocean AJ, Singh S, Zhang H, Thakur BK, Becker A, Hoshino A, Mark MT, Molina H, et al. Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol. 2015;17:816–26.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Peinado H, Aleckovic M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G, Hergueta-Redondo M, Williams C, Garcia-Santos G, Ghajar C, et al. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18:883–91.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sheridan C. Exosome cancer diagnostic reaches market. Nat Biotechnol. 2016;34:359–60.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Andre F, Schartz NE, Movassagh M, Flament C, Pautier P, Morice P, Pomel C, Lhomme C, Escudier B, Le Chevalier T, et al. Malignant effusions and immunogenic tumour-derived exosomes. Lancet. 2002;360:295–305.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Cheng N, Du D, Wang X, Liu D, Xu W, Luo Y, Lin Y. Recent advances in biosensors for detecting Cancer-derived exosomes. Trends Biotechnol. 2019.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.04.008. [Epub ahead of print]
  98. 98.
    Meng X, Muller V, Milde-Langosch K, Trillsch F, Pantel K, Schwarzenbach H. Diagnostic and prognostic relevance of circulating exosomal miR-373, miR-200a, miR-200b and miR-200c in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:16923–35.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Dorayappan KDP, Gardner ML, Hisey CL, Zingarelli RA, Smith BQ, Lightfoot MDS, Gogna R, Flannery MM, Hays J, Hansford DJ, et al. A microfluidic Chip enables isolation of exosomes and establishment of their protein profiles and associated signaling pathways in ovarian Cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79:3503–13.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Wu M, Wang G, Hu W, Yao Y, Yu XF. Emerging roles and therapeutic value of exosomes in cancer metastasis. Mol Cancer. 2019;18:53.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    de la Fuente A, Alonso-Alconada L, Costa C, Cueva J, Garcia-Caballero T, Lopez-Lopez R, Abal M. M-trap: exosome-based capture of tumor cells as a new technology in peritoneal metastasis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(9).  https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv184.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Wang Y, Hu X, Zhang L, Zhu C, Wang J, Li Y, Wang Y, Wang C, Zhang Y, Yuan Q. Bioinspired extracellular vesicles embedded with black phosphorus for molecular recognition-guided biomineralization. Nat Commun. 2019;10:2829.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Hoshino A, Costa-Silva B, Shen TL, Rodrigues G, Hashimoto A, Tesic Mark M, Molina H, Kohsaka S, Di Giannatale A, Ceder S, et al. Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature. 2015;527:329–35.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Peinado H, Alečković M, Lavotshkin S, Matei I, Costa-Silva B, Moreno-Bueno G, Hergueta-Redondo M, Williams C, García-Santos G, Ghajar CM. Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med. 2012;18:883.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityZhengzhouChina
  2. 2.Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryDavid Geffen School of Medicine at UCLALos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations