Advertisement

Malaria Journal

, 17:357 | Cite as

Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection among pregnant women at first antenatal visit in post-Ebola Monrovia, Liberia

  • Guillermo Martínez-Pérez
  • Dawoh Peter Lansana
  • Senga Omeonga
  • Himanshu Gupta
  • Bondey Breeze-Barry
  • Raquel González
  • Azucena Bardají
  • Adelaida Sarukhan
  • James D. K. Goteh
  • Edith Tody
  • Pau Cisteró
  • Benard Benda
  • Juwe D. Kercula
  • Fanta D. Kibungu
  • Ana Meyer García-Sípido
  • Quique Bassat
  • Christine K. Tarr-Attia
  • Alfredo Mayor
Open Access
Research

Abstract

Background

Disruption of malaria control strategies during the West African 2014–2016 Ebola epidemic led to an increase in malaria-attributable mortality. However, recent data on malaria infection in vulnerable groups, such as pregnant women, are lacking in this post-Ebola scenario. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess the prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection and of molecular markers of drug resistance among pregnant women attending antenatal care in Monrovia, capital of Liberia.

Methods

From October 2016 to June 2017, all pregnant women attending their first antenatal care visit at the Saint Joseph’s Catholic Hospital, Monrovia, were invited to participate in the study. In addition to their routine antenatal care tests, capillary blood spotted onto filter papers were collected from all consenting participants to determine presence of P. falciparum by real-time quantitative PCR. Molecular markers of anti-malarial drug resistance were assessed through Sanger sequencing and quantitative PCR in specimens positive for P. falciparum analysis.

Results

Of the 195 women participants, 24 (12.3%) were P. falciparum-positive by qPCR. Infected women tended to be more commonly primigravidae and younger than uninfected ones. Parasite densities were higher in primigravidae. Fever was more frequently detected among the infected women. No statistically significant association between P. falciparum infection and haemoglobin levels or insecticide-treated net use was found. While high prevalence of genetic polymorphisms associated with chloroquine and amodiaquine resistance were detected, no molecular markers of artemisinin resistance were observed.

Conclusion

Plasmodium falciparum infections are expected to occur in at least one in every eight women attending first ANC at private clinics in Monrovia and outside the peak of the rainy season. Young primigravidae are at increased risk of P. falciparum infection. Molecular analyses did not provide evidence of resistance to artemisinins among the P. falciparum isolates tested. Further epidemiological studies involving pregnant women are necessary to describe the risk of malaria in this highly susceptible group outside Monrovia, as well as to closely monitor the emergence of resistance to anti-malarials, as recommended by the Liberian National Malaria Control Programme.

Keywords

Malaria Pregnancy Prevalence Antenatal Liberia Parasite resistance 

Background

Children and pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to Plasmodium spp. infection and disease, which translates into significant negative consequences for the health of mothers and infants [1, 2, 3]. In Liberia, West Africa, malaria transmission is perennial throughout the year, and infections are mostly caused by Plasmodium falciparum [4]. According to the 2011 and 2016 National Malaria Indicator Surveys (MIS), malaria prevalence remains high, peaking at 45.0% among children 6–59 months of age [5, 6].

The Liberian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare (LMoHSW) recommends the use of artemisinin-based combined therapy (ACT), intermittent preventive treatment during pregnancy (IPTp) with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP), and provision of insecticide-treated nets (ITN) as key strategies for control of malaria in pregnancy [7]. As in other sub-Saharan African countries, uptake of IPTp remains suboptimal and far from global coverage targets [8]. The 2013 national Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) reported that 48% of women who gave birth in the past 2 years had received two or more doses of IPTp-SP and that 37% of pregnant women slept under an ITN the preceding night [9].

Both the scale-up of ITN distribution and IPTp-SP, as strategies to protect pregnant women from malaria, were discontinued during the recent Ebola epidemic that resulted in over 10,000 deaths in Liberia, Sierra Leone and Guinea Conakry [10, 11, 12]. Mathematical modelling estimated that the interruption of malaria control could have caused a 62% increase in mortality by malaria [13]. Pregnant women were particularly affected since many stopped attending antenatal care (ANC) services and preferred to deliver outside the health facilities [14, 15, 16]. Fear of becoming infected with Ebola and the decimation of the healthcare workforce to this disease, in addition with the interruption of regular healthcare services added to the financial, geographical and social challenges that women were already facing to access healthcare in Liberia [11, 17].

Although progress has been made globally in the implementation of vector control tools and other preventive tools to decrease the incidence of malaria [18, 19], development of insecticide resistance from the vectors and of anti-malarial resistance from the parasite might hamper the success of available treatment and preventive tools [20, 21]. The real threat posed by the potential emergence and/or spread of malaria parasites resistant to artemisinin and its derivatives [22], and the need to guide the choice of anti-malarial drugs by National Malaria Control Programmes, all warrant enhanced molecular surveillance to map the prevalence of molecular markers of resistance, particularly in the absence of regional capacities to conduct in vivo clinical trials [23, 24]. Markers k13 [25, 26, 27], pfcrt [28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33], pfmdr1 [31, 34, 35, 36, 37] and pfdhps [38] are of special interest to Liberia as—since the availability of substandard anti-malarials in the Liberian market is documented [39]—they could help monitor resistance to current LMoHSW-endorsed IPTp-SP and artesunate–amodiaquine-based first-line ACT [7].

To date, there is a dearth of studies assessing how interruption of malaria control and care services during the Ebola outbreak might have led to self-treatment with substandard anti-malarial drugs bought in local chemists and, as consequence, fuel the appearance of markers of parasite resistances. In addition, there are no available survey-based data on prevalence of Plasmodium spp. infection among pregnant women [5, 6] before and after the Ebola outbreak. To inform the design and roll out of enhanced malaria prevention and care targeting pregnant women in post-Ebola Liberia, baseline descriptive epidemiological data on prevalence of malaria infection and disease, as well as on the emergence of drug resistance are needed.

Methods

Aim and design

This was an observational cross-sectional study that aimed to assess the burden of malaria among pregnant women attending ANC in Monrovia. Specific objectives of the study included determining the prevalence of P. falciparum infection in this particular vulnerable group through molecular assays, and assessing molecular markers of drug resistance in P. falciparum isolates.

Study site and population

The study was conducted at the Outpatients Department (OPD) of the not-for-profit Saint Joseph’s Catholic Hospital (SJCH) in Congo Town neighbourhood, Monrovia. The SJCH was founded in 1963 by the Hospitaller Order of the Brothers of St John of God. In 2014, the SJCH closed for 4 months after nine of its staff members died to Ebola. Since its reopening in 2015, the SJCH provides general services to the population of Monrovia. Although the SJCH applies a cost recovery system for the general public, the institution has a charity arm to subsidize healthcare-related costs for the most deprived ones. Its official fee for a first ANC is of 5.00 USD. However, as the SJCH is supported by the National HIV and Malaria Programmes, diagnostics and therapeutics for HIV/AIDS and malaria are provided free-of-charge.

Inclusion criteria set for sampling eligible participants at the OPD included: pregnant women of any gestational age attending ANC at the SJCH for the first time in their current pregnancy. Women unwilling to give consent to participate or who reported having received any IPTp dose during their current pregnancy were excluded. Calculations indicated that a sample of 198 women was needed to detect a prevalence of PCR-confirmed parasitaemia of 50% (conservative estimate) with a ± 5% precision and a confidence level of 95%.

Recruitment and specimen collection

After an initial period of training to the SJCH staff, recruitment and specimen collection was done between October 2016 and June 2017. All women arriving at the OPD who met the inclusion criteria were invited to participate and informed of the study objectives and specimen collection procedures.

After providing written informed consent, they were queried regarding basic socio-demographic and malaria prevention-related data (i.e. use of ITN the preceding night, or last time their house was sprayed indoor-residual insecticides). Participants were also asked to volunteer their HIV and tuberculosis status, if known. An infrared thermometer was used to measure forehead temperature. Gestational age was assessed by date of last menstrual period and by measurement of fundal height. All data were manually captured by the recruiting midwife using individual standardized case report forms.

All participants were referred to the SJCH Laboratory for specimen collection. Results of routine tests done at the SJCH laboratory as part of standard ANC care for all pregnant women (i.e. HIV, haemoglobin and syphilis) were also captured in their case report forms. Haemoglobin level was obtained using point-of-care Hemocue Hb 301 (®Radiometer Group, Ängelholm, Sweden). HIV serostatus and syphilis screening were assessed using rapid tests SD Bioline HIV-1/2 3.0 (®Alere Inc., Waltham, MA) and SD Bioline HIV/Syphilis Duo (®Alere Inc., Waltham, MA), respectively.

Laboratory methods

Capillary blood from the women’s fingers was collected on two Whatman 903 filter papers that were shipped to ISGlobal Laboratory (Barcelona, Spain) for molecular testing. The presence of P. falciparum was determined by real-time Quantitative PCR (qPCR). Briefly, DNA extracted by Chelex method from the filter paper was used for detection of 18S rRNA in duplicate [40, 41]. Parasite density was quantified by extrapolation of cycle thresholds (Ct) from a standard curve of P. falciparum ring-infected erythrocytes. A negative control with no template DNA was run in all reactions.

Samples that tested positive for P. falciparum were subjected for the analysis of molecular markers of anti-malarial drug resistance using previously described methods [42, 43, 44]. DNA from samples with less than 5 parasites/μL was subjected to pre-amplification using PicoPLEX WGA Kit (®Rubicon Genomics: Cat. No. —R30050) as per manufacturer’s instructions. DNA templates were then subjected to PCR amplification of molecular markers of k13, pfcrt, pfmdr1 and pfdhps genes using a 2720 thermal cycler (®Applied Biosystems) followed by direct DNA Sanger sequencing bi-directionally [44]. A set of primer pair (Fw: caaattctatagtgtagttc; Rv: aattgtgtgatttgtccacaa) was used to sequence pfdhps 522–646 amino acid positions. For pfpm2 and pfmdr1 genes, copy number (CN) was also determined by SYBR-based qPCR (2× Power SYBR Green PCT Master Mix; ®Thermo Fisher Scientific, Washington, WA, UK) [44, 45]. All samples with estimated CN > 1.5 were repeated for confirmation. Water and human genomic DNA were used as negative controls. A total of six positive controls with known k13 alleles; four parasite lines (3D7, 7G8, Dd2 and V1/S) with known pfcrt and pfmdr1 alleles; four plasmids (DHPS-V1S, DHPS-PERU, DHPS-MALI and DHPS-DD2) with known pfdhps alleles; one positive control (C4) with known copies (3–4) of pfpm2 gene; another positive control (Dd2) with known copies (3–4) of pfmdr1 were also processed, amplified and sequenced. Isolates with mixed alleles were considered as mutated for the purposes of polymorphism frequency estimation.

Data management

A unique identification number was used to link signed consent forms to case report forms. Case report forms did not include personal identifiers and were used to collect socio-demographic, malaria care-related data, and ANC routine laboratory tests data. Data from the case report forms were digitized by a SJCH trained clerk into an online case record form manager built in open source software OpenClinica (®OpenClinica LLL., Waltham, MA) and kept safely in a locked cabinet at the SJCH. ISGlobal Laboratory data were directly captured by the laboratory technician into the OpenClinica-generated dataset. Access to OpenClinica was password protected. OpenClinica server is kept at the Hospital Clínic (Barcelona, Spain) server.

Definitions and statistical analysis

All blood specimens collected were included in the qPCR analysis. A positive P. falciparum infection in peripheral blood by qPCR, irrespective of parasite density, was the primary outcome in the analysis presented in this paper. Fever was defined as temperature ≥ 38 °C, and maternal anaemia as haemoglobin levels < 11 mg/dL (being mild if between 10 and 10.9 mg/dL, moderate if between 7 and 9.9 mg/dL, and severe if < 7 mg/dL). Women were classified as primigravidae (first pregnancy) or multigravidae (at least one previous pregnancy).

Cross tabulations and t-test, Pearson Chi squared test (χ2) or Fisher’s exact test were used, where appropriate, to explore whether socio-demographics and other health-related variables of interest were associated with P. falciparum infection. Data analysis was conducted using STATA v.12.0 (®StataCorp LLD., College Station, Texas, USA). Significance level was set at p < 0.05.

Ethics

The study was conducted in accordance with the ICH E6 Good Clinical Practice [46], and under the provisions of the Declaration of Helsinki [47], and local rules and regulations. Written informed consent was sought for all women if 18 years of age or older. Parental consent in addition to minor assent was sought for all women aged younger than 18 years. Participants did not receive any retribution for their engagement as study subjects. Refusal to participate in this study did not affect service provision as per standard ANC practice. All women invited to enrol in this study, both consenting and non-consenting, received their first dosage of IPTp and treatment for anaemia, if necessary.

This research protocol was approved by the local University of Liberia-Pacific Institute Research and Evaluation Institutional Review Board (UL-PIRE, Monrovia, Liberia) and by the Hospital Clínic Health Research Ethics Committee (CEIC, Barcelona, Spain).

Results

One hundred and ninety-eight women meeting inclusion criteria were invited to participate, and all of them consented. Of the 198 women enrolled, three decided to discontinue their participation before collection of blood specimens. The analysis presented is based on data from the 195 women with peripheral blood samples available and analysed for P. falciparum infection.

Clinical and socio-demographics characteristics of study women

All participants were residents of Monrovia and peri-urban areas. Their mean age was 27.3 years (standard deviation [SD] 6.1; range 14–43) and 7 (3.6%) were younger than 18 years of age. More than half (57.9%) of the participants had concluded secondary studies and 15% had not completed any education (Table 1). One in four women (26.7%) were students with no source of income, whilst one third of the total (34.9%) were self-employed in the sales and services sector.
Table 1

Clinical and socio-demographic profile of study women

Variables

n (%)

Age (in years) range (n  = 191)

 ≤ 17

7 (3.7%)

 18–25

65 (34.0%)

 26–35

92 (48.2%)

 ≥ 36

27 (14.1%)

 Mean (SD)

27.3 (6.10)

Anaemia (n  = 193)

 Normal range (≥ 11 mg/dL)

113 (58.5%)

 Anaemia (< 11 mg/dL)

80 (41.5%)

 Mean haemoglobin levels (SD)

11.2 (1.42)

Gravidity (n = 194)

 Primigravidae

141 (27.3%)

 Multigravidae

53 (72.7%)

Gestational age (n  = 186)

 Mean (SD)

17.7 (7.14)

Fever (n  = 188)

 No

182 (96.8%)

 Yes, ≥ 38 °C at point of enrolment

6 (3.2%)

Anti-malarial use (n  = 195)

 Not in the current pregnancy

140 (71.8%)

 Yes in the current pregnancy

55 (28.2%)

Tuberculosis (n  = 195)

 Not on TB treatment

193 (99.0%)

 Self-reported on TB treatment

2 (1.0%)

HIV (n  = 167)

 Confirmed negative test

162 (97.0%)

 Confirmed positive test

5 (3.0%)

Syphilis (n  = 160)

 Confirmed negative test

159 (99.4%)

 Confirmed positive test

1 (0.6%)

ITN (n  = 195)

 Did not use an ITN the preceding night

139 (71.3%)

 Slept under an ITN the preceding night

56 (28.7%)

Education completed (n  = 186)

 None

25 (14.6%)

 Primary

24 (14.0%)

 Secondary

97 (56.7%)

 Tertiary/college

1 (0.6%)

 University

17 (9.9%)

Current occupation (n  = 194)

 Professional/technological

12 (7.0%)

 Sales/services: self-employed

62 (36.3%)

 Sales/services: salaried

12 (7.0%)

 Skilled/unskilled manual

14 (8.2%)

 Clerical

4 (2.3%)

 Student (no other paid occupation)

43 (25.2%)

 Unemployed

23 (13.5%)

n number of participants

Over a fourth (27.3%) of the participants were primigravidae (Table 1). Multigravidae women (n = 141) reported an average of 3.5 (range 2–10) pregnancies. Mean gestational age at first ANC visit was 17 weeks (SD 7.14).

Of the 193 women with haemoglobin test results, 29 (14.9%) and 51 (26.1%) had moderate and mild anaemia, respectively. No severe anaemia cases were detected. Six women (3.2%) had fever, and 55 (28.2%) self-reported having had taken anti-malarials in their current pregnancy.

Only two participants (1%) reported being on treatment for tuberculosis. No participant reported being HIV-infected. Of the 167 women who received an HIV rapid test, five (3.0%) had a confirmatory positive result. Among the 160 women who agreed to test for syphilis, only one (0.6%) was positive (Table 2).
Table 2

Health-related data and laboratory examinations

Variables

Uninfected (n  = 171, 87.7%)a

P. falciparum infection (n  = 24, 12.3%)a

p

n (%)

n (%)

Age (n  = 191)

 Mean (SD)

27.6 (SD 5.88)

24.9 (7.19)

0.045b

Anaemia (n  = 193)

 Mean haemoglobin levels (SD)

11.26 (1.45)

10.89 (1.13)

0.231b

Gravidity (n  = 194)

 Multigravidae

128 (75.3%)

13 (54.2%)

 

 Primigravidae

42 (24.7%)

11 (45.8%)

0.030c

Gestational age (n  = 195)

 1st trimester (1–14 weeks)

59 (34.5%)

10 (41.7%)

 

 2nd trimester (15–28 weeks)

100 (58.5%)

11 (45.8%)

 

 3rd trimester (≥ 29 weeks)

12 (7.0%)

3 (12.5%)

0.423c

Fever (n  = 188)

 No

164 (98.2%)

18 (85.7%)

 

 Yes, ≥ 38 °C at point of enrolment

3 (1.8%)

3 (14.3%)

0.019d

Anti-malarial use (n  = 195)

 Not in the current pregnancy

123 (71.9%)

17 (70.8%)

 

 Yes in the current pregnancy

48 (28.1%)

7 (29.2%)

0.911c

Tuberculosis (n  = 195)

 Not on TB treatment

170 (99.4%)

23 (95.8%)

 

 Self-reported on TB treatment

1 (0.6%)

1 (4.2%)

0.232d

HIV rapid test (n  = 167)

 Confirmed negative test

143 (97.9%)

19 (90.5%)

 

 Confirmed positive test

3 (2.0%)

2 (9.5%)

0.119d

Syphilis rapid test (n  = 160)

 Confirmed negative test

140 (100.0%)

19 (95.0%)

 

 Confirmed positive test

0 (0.0%)

1 (5.0%)

0.125d

ITN (n  = 195)

 Did not used an ITN the preceding night

123 (71.9%)

16 (66.7%)

 

 Slept under an ITN the preceding night

48 (28.1%)

8 (33.3%)

0.594c

Education completed (n  = 186)

 None

25 (14.6%)

3 (12.5%)

 

 Primary

24 (14.0%)

2 (8.3%)

 

 Secondary

97 (56.7%)

16 (66.7%)

 

 Tertiary

1 (0.6%)

0 (0.0%)

 

 University

17 (9.9%)

1 (4.2%)

0.800c

Current occupation (n  = 194)

 Professional/technological

12 (7.0%)

2 (8.3%)

 

 Sales/services: self-employed

62 (36.3%)

6 (25.0%)

 

 Sales/services: salaried

12 (7.0%)

2 (8.3%)

 

 Skilled/unskilled manual

14 (8.2%)

1 (4.2%)

 

 Clerical

4 (2.3%)

0 (0.0%)

 

 Student (no other paid occupation)

43 (25.2%)

9 (37.5%)

 

 Unemployed

23 (13.5%)

4 (16.7%)

0.420c

n number of participants

aOf the total (n = 195). Frequencies and rates in bivariate analyses below exclude missing values

bt-test

cPearson χ2

dFisher’s exact

All women but two (98.9%) reported that their home was never targeted in an indoor residual spraying program. Two-thirds of the total (71.3%) reported that they had not slept under an ITN the preceding night.

Prevalence of Plasmodium falciparum infection and association with demographic and health-related variables

Twenty-four women (12.3%) were confirmed as P. falciparum positive by qPCR (Table 2). Parasite densities tended to be lower in multigravidae than in primigravidae (Fig. 1). Low density P. falciparum infections (parasite densities below 10 parasites/µL) were more frequent among multigravidae (62% [8/13]) than among primigravidae (18% [2/11]; p = 0.047).
Fig. 1

Plasmodium falciparum densities according to gravidity

Compared to the uninfected women (Table 2), P. falciparum-infected women were significantly younger (24.9 vs. 27.6 years; p = 0.044) and in their first pregnancy (45.83 vs. 24.7%; p = 0.030). No associations between infection and education or occupation were found.

No statistically significant differences in terms of haemoglobin levels were found between the P. falciparum-infected (mean 10.89; range 9.2–13.7) and uninfected women (mean 11.26; range 7–16; Table 2). In total, 50.0% and 40.2% of the P. falciparum-infected and the uninfected women had anaemia, respectively (p = 0.364). Occurrence of fever was significantly more frequent among the infected women (14.3% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.019). No associations were found between P. falciparum infection and self-reported tuberculosis status, positive syphilis test, positive HIV test, and the use of ITNs (Table 2).

Molecular markers of anti-malarial resistance

Of the 24 samples positive for P. falciparum by qPCR, 17 (70.8%) and 11 (45.8%) were successfully analysed for polymorphisms (k13, pfmdr1, pfdhps and pfcrt) and copy number (pfpm2 and pfmdr1), respectively (Table 3). Sequencing analysis of all laboratory positive controls with known alleles revealed the presence of wild and mutant-type alleles of k13, pfmdr1, pfcrt and pfdhps polymorphisms. The estimated pfpm2 and pfmdr1 copy number for the laboratory positive controls (C4 and Dd2) were between 3 and 4 copies using SYBR®-based qPCR. The qPCR assays were specific to P. falciparum gDNA only, as no amplifications were noticed in negative controls (with water and human genomic DNA).
Table 3

Molecular markers of P. falciparum anti-malarial resistance

Genes

SNP

Wild-type

Mutant

Pfmdr1

Multi-drug resistance

N86Y

8 (47.0%)

9 (52.9%)

L155L (Syn)

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

Y184F

7 (41.2%)

10 (58.8%)

S1034C

17 (100.0%)

0 (0%)

N1042D

17 (100.0%)

0 (0%)

D1246Y

15 (88.2%)

2 (11.8%)

Pfdhps

Sulfadoxine

S436A

12 (70.6%)

5 (29.4%)

A437G

14 (82.3%)

3 (17.6%)

K540E

17 (100.0%)

0 (0%)

A581G

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

A613S

15 (88.2%)

2 (11.8%)

Pfcrt

Chloroquine

M74I

2 (11.8%)

15 (88.2%)

N75E

2 (11.8%)

15 (88.2%)

K76T

2 (11.8%)

15 (88.2%)

I77I (Syn)

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

I103I (Syn)

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

K13

Artemisinin

V510V (Syn)

16 (94.1%)

1 (5.9%)

SNP single nucleotide polymorphisms, Syn synonymous mutation (no amino acid change)

The proportion of the pfdhps polymorphisms S436F, A437G, A581G and A613S described as associated with sulfadoxine resistance was 29.4% (5/17), 17.6% (3/17), 5.9% (1/17) and 11.8% (2/17), respectively. All the isolates had wild-type allele at K540E polymorphism of pfdhps gene. In the pfcrt gene, mutant alleles were found at codons M74I, N75E and K76T [88.2% (15/17)]. Two novel synonymous polymorphisms (I77I and I103I [5.9% (1/17)]) were observed in the pfcrt gene. A total of four polymorphisms were identified across the pfmdr1 gene. The prevalence of N86Y, L155L, Y184F and D1246Y mutant alleles was 47.1% (8/17), 5.9% (1/17), 58.8% (10/17) and 11.8% (2/17), respectively. The other most frequent S1034C and N1042D polymorphisms of pfmdr1 gene were not observed. The most frequent polymorphisms in k13 observed previously in Cambodian isolates [25] were absent in the P. falciparum isolates analysed. However, a novel synonymous polymorphism V510V [5.9% (1/17)] was observed. All the isolates carried a single copy of pfpm2 and pfmdr1 genes.

Discussion

This appears to be the first study conducted in Liberia assessing the prevalence of P. falciparum infection among pregnant women after the Ebola epidemic that led to the interruption of malaria control [10, 13]. This study found a 12.3% prevalence of P. falciparum (by qPCR) among pregnant women attending to their first ANC visit at a non-government hospital in Monrovia, and before administration of any IPTp-SP dose. Molecular analysis of genetic markers of anti-malarial resistance showed no compromised therapeutic efficacy of ACT, but suggests suboptimal prevention by SP provided as IPTp.

Young primigravidae had the highest burden of P. falciparum infection at first antenatal visit. Similarly, low density infections were more common in multigravidae than in primigravidae women. This difference was not due to increased use of ITNs among the multigravidae. Rather, this observation is in line with the concept that the lack of immunity to the antigenic variants presented by P. falciparum parasites that accumulate selectively in the placenta increases the risk of P. falciparum infection in primigravidae [48, 49, 50]. However, this prevalence is much lower than the prevalence observed in the national 2016 MIS among children aged 6–59 months (26.9% and 61.9% by RDT in urban and rural areas respectively) [6]. Use of ITN among our participants (28%) was slightly lower than was reported at the 2013 DHS (37%) [9] and at the 2016 MIS (35% in urban areas) [6]. Half of the P. falciparum-infected women (50.0%; see Table 2) had subclinical malaria (i.e. without fever, anaemia) and could sustain malaria transmission [51].

Genetic polymorphisms associated with parasite resistance to chloroquine and pyrimethamine were detected in rural Liberia as early as 1978 [52]. Three decades later, resistance to chloroquine and SP continued to rise [53]. In 2003, national policies endorsed ACT with artesunate–amodiaquine as first treatment option for P. falciparum uncomplicated malaria [5]. In this study, a high prevalence of K76T, N86Y, Y184F and D1246Y (pfcrt and pfmdr1) polymorphisms previously associated with resistance to chloroquine and to artesunate–amodiaquine (88.2, 47.1, 58.8 and 11.8%, respectively) was observed [29, 31, 32, 54, 55]. In contrast, prevalence of molecular markers of resistance to the sulfadoxine component of SP—considering 540 as a surrogate of quintuple mutants in Africa [56]—was relatively low, in accordance with molecular data obtained in the region [57]. The prevalence data of polymorphisms align with previously published data generated from the only recent study that collected pre-treatment isolates from children below 5 years of age, and reported occurrence of polymorphisms associated to current ACT used in Liberia [31]. In the present study, only one synonymous k13 polymorphism was observed among the P. falciparum isolates tested, thus demonstrating the absence of genetic evidences of artemisinin resistance in the parasite population circulating in Monrovia.

To strengthen malaria control in post-Ebola Liberia, enhanced surveillance and community-tailored health promotion is deemed urgent. Given the significant investment in PCR equipment during the Ebola epidemic in Liberia, surveillance could be enhanced by improving capacities at multiple sentinel sites. Indeed, the addition of PCR-based diagnostics to detect P. falciparum was considered feasible and did not pose additional safety risks to staff during the Ebola outbreak [58]. Continuous surveillance of malaria at ANC could be useful to assess temporal trends in the burden of malaria, to promptly detect emergence of anti-malarial resistance, and to provide prevention, treatment and health education to the pregnant women at risk of malaria infection [59].

Accompanying these surveillance efforts with clinic and community-based health promotion could improve the success of control and preventive measures against malaria. As reported in a qualitative study conducted in Monrovia in parallel to this prevalence study, many pregnant women may see their access to malaria care impeded due to low perception of their increased risk to malaria and to avoid unofficial fees requested by health staff at government-run clinics [60]. As a result, many women may resort to traditional herbal medicine or may opt to self-medicate with substandard anti-malarials that are easily available in the local chemists. All these practices and attitudes could lead to the worsening of the symptomatology and prognosis of their malaria disease and to the appearance of resistances to LMoHSW-endorsed anti-malarial regimes, and must be considered in the planning of malaria control activities in Liberia.

Limitations

An important limitation to consider is that the recruitment period took place from October to June. Hence, no participant was recruiting during the peak months of the rainy season, which may justify the relatively low prevalence observed. Another limitation is that this study was conducted in an institution that charges pregnant women for the first ANC, a factor that could have limited recruitment of certain women who may be more prone to exposure to malaria infection. The findings of this study might be extrapolated only to the group of women of low-middle class with access to employment and education.

Additionally, recall bias could have compromised participants’ self-reporting of previous use of malaria prevention and treatment. Potential effect of recall bias was minimized by intensive training on study specific procedures for data collection to the recruiting staff.

Conclusion

In conclusion, P. falciparum infections are expected in at least one in every eight women attending first ANC at a non-Government-run facility in Monrovia and outside the peak of the rainy season. The risk of P. falciparum infection is higher among young primigravidae. No genetic evidence of resistance to artemisinins was found among the P. falciparum isolates tested. More epidemiological studies involving pregnant women in Liberia are needed to describe the risk of malaria in this highly susceptible group in other settings in the country, as well as to closely monitor the emergence of resistance to commonly used anti-malarials in-country.

Notes

Authors’ contributions

AM, GMP, QB and SO designed the study. DPL led the field research in Liberia. SO, BB, CKT, ET, BB, FDK recruited participants and collected and processed the data. PC performed the qPCR tests analyses. HG performed the molecular analysis of anti-malarial resistance. GMP and AM did the statistical analysis. GMP, AS and AM prepared the draft manuscript and DPL, SO, BB, CKT, JDG, ET, PC, HG, BB, JDK, FDK, AMG and QB revised and contributed intellectually to its preparation for submission. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

We are indebted to all the study participants as well as to the community leaders from Congo Town neighbourhood who gave us their time and insights to prepare this publication. We are especially indebted to two of the St Joseph Catholic Hospital’s staff participants who demonstrated much enthusiasm towards this study and who, unfortunately, died before we could share the final findings with them. Authors would like to thank Didier Ménard (Institut Pasteur, Paris, France) for his help with positive controls of k13 gene.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets prepared and analysed during the current study are deposited and are publicly available in the Universitat de Barcelona Digital Repository (Persistent Web Link to Dataset: forthcoming).

Consent for publication

As part of the informed consent process, all participants in this study gave the research team permission for their data to be recorded, transcribed, anonymized, analysed and used in the preparation of any scientific publication.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The University of Liberia-Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation Institutional Review Board (Ref.: 16-08-003; UL-PIRE IRB, Monrovia, Liberia) and the Hospital Clínic Health Research Ethics Committee (Ref.: HCB/2016/0604; CEIC, Barcelona, Spain) gave ethics approval on the study protocol and the consent forms.

Participation in this study was voluntary. Under no circumstances the clinical management of pregnant women was affected by their decision to participate or not in the study. Participants were free to withdraw from the study at any time. Each participant received written information about the study which was also explained by trained study staff. Sufficient time was given to the participant to decide whether or not to participate in the study. Information sheet and consent form documents were available in English language. All participants in this study gave written informed consent.

Funding

This study was conducted thanks to a Grant from the European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP Ebola-CSA-334) and the World Health Organization Special Programme for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases. The EDCTP2 programme is supported under Horizon 2020, the European Union’s Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. ISGlobal is a member of the CERCA Programme, Generalitat de Catalunya. Alfredo Mayor is supported by the Department d’Universitats I Recerca de la Generalitat de Catalunya (AGAUR; 2014SGR263). Himanshu Gupta has a fellowship from the SERB, DST, Government of India (SB/OS/PDF-043/2015-16).

The funding body had no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Ataíde R, Mayor A, Rogerson SJ. Malaria, primigravidae, and antibodies: knowledge gained and future perspectives. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30:85–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    González R, Sevene E, Jagoe G, Slutsker L, Menéndez C. A public health paradox: the women most vulnerable to malaria are the least protected. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schantz-Dunn J, Nour NM. Malaria and pregnancy: a global health perspective. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2009;2:186–92.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    WHO Global Malaria Programme. World Malaria Report 2016. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    National Malaria Control Programme of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services, ICF International. Liberia. Malaria indicator survey. Monrovia; 2012.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    National Malaria Control Programme of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services, DHS Programme. Liberia malaria indicator survey (LMIS); key indicators. 2016. Monrovia; 2017. https://dhsprogram.com/pubs/pdf/PR87/PR87.pdf. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
  7. 7.
    National Malaria Control Programme of the Ministry of Health and Social Welfare. National Malaria Strategic Plan 2010–2015. Monrovia; 2010.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Andrews KG, Lynch M, Eckert E, Gutman J. Missed opportunities to deliver intermittent preventive treatment for malaria to pregnant women 2003–2013: a systematic analysis of 58 household surveys in sub-Saharan Africa. Malar J. 2015;14:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Liberia Institute of Statistics and Geo-Information Services, Liberia Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Liberia National AIDS Control Programme, ICF International. Liberia Demographic and health survey 2013. Monrovia; 2014.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunbar NK, Richards EE, Woldeyohannes D, Van den Bergh R, Wilkinson E, Tamang D, et al. Knockdown and recovery of malaria diagnosis and treatment in Liberia during and after the 2014 Ebola outbreak. Public Health Action. 2017;7(Suppl 1):76–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Evans DK, Goldstein M, Popova A. Health-care mortality and the legacy of the Ebola epidemic. Lancet Global Health. 2015;3:e439–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kirigia JM, Masiye F, Gatwiri Kirigia D, Akweongo P. Indirect costs associated with deaths from the Ebola virus disease in West Africa. Infect Dis Poverty. 2015;4:45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walker GT, White MT, Griffin JT, Reynolds A, Ferguson NM, Ghani AC. Malaria morbidity and mortality in Ebola-affected countries caused by decreased health-care capacity, and the potential effect of mitigation strategies: a modelling analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15:825–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Iyengar P, Kerber K, Howe CJ, Dahn B. Services for mothers and newborns during the Ebola outbreak in Liberia: the need for improvement in emergencies. PLoS Curr. 2015;7:1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.4ba318308719ac86fbef91f8e56cb66f CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lori JR, Rominski SD, Perosky JE, Munro ML, Williams G, Bell SA, et al. A case series study on the effect of Ebola on facility-based deliveries in rural Liberia. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ly J, Sathananthan V, Griffiths T, Kanjee Z, Kenny A, Gordon N, et al. Facility-based delivery during the Ebola Virus disease epidemic in rural Liberia: analysis from a cross-sectional population-based household survey. PLoS Med. 2016;13:e1002096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luginaah IN, Kangmennaang J, Fallah M, Dahn B, Kateh F, Neyswah T. Timing and utilization of antenatal care services in Liberia: understanding the pre-Ebola epidemic context. Soc Sci Med. 2016;160:75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Raghavendra K, Barik TK, Niranjan Reddy BP, Sharma P, Dash AP. Malaria vector control: from past to future. Parasitol Res. 2011;108:757–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Tuju J, Kamuyu G, Murungi LM, Osier FHA. Vaccine candidate discovery for the next generation of malaria vaccines. Immunology. 2017;152:195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thu AM, Phyo AP, Landlier J, Parker DM, Nosten FH. Combating multidrug-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. FEBS J. 2017;284:2569–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhou LJ, Xia J, Wei HX, Liu XJ, Peng HJ. Risk of drug resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria therapy—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitol Res. 2017;116:781–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lu F, Culleton R, Zhang M, Ramaprasad A, von Seidlein L, Zhou H, et al. Emergence of indigenous artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum in Africa. N Engl J Med. 2017;376:991–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schramm B, Valeh P, Baudin E, Mazinda CS, Smith R, Pinoges L, et al. Efficacy of artesunate–amodiaquine and artemether–lumefantrine fixed-dose combinations for the treatment of uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria among children aged six to 59 months in Nimba County, Liberia: an open-label randomized non-inferiority trial. Malar J. 2013;12:251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    WHO. Methods for Surveillance of antimalarial drug efficacy. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ariey F, Witkowski B, Amaratunga C, Beghain J, Langlois AC, Khim N, et al. A molecular marker of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria. Nature. 2014;505:50–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dondorp AM, Nosten F, Yi P, Das D, Phyo AP, Tarning J, et al. Artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:455–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noedl H, Se Y, Schaecher K, Smith BL, Socheat D, Fukuda MM. Artemisinin resistance in Cambodia 1 (ARC1) Study Consortium. Evidence of artemisinin-resistant malaria in western Cambodia. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:2619–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Agrawal S, Moser KA, Morton L, Cummings MP, Parihar A, Dwivedi A, et al. Association of a novel mutation in the Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter with decreased piperaquine sensitivity. J Infect Dis. 2017;216:468–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Folarin OA, Bustamante C, Gbotosho GO, Sowunmi A, Zalis MG, Oduola AM, et al. In vitro amodiaquine resistance and its association with mutations in pfcrt and pfmdr1 genes of Plasmodium falciparum isolates from Nigeria. Acta Trop. 2011;120:224–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Miotto O, Amato R, Ashley EA, MacInnis B, Almagro-García J, Amaratunga C, et al. Genetic architecture of artemisinin-resistant Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Genet. 2015;47:226–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Otienoburu SD, Maïga-Ascofaré O, Schramm B, Jullien V, Jones JJ, Zolia YM, et al. Selection of Plasmodium falciparum pfcrt and pfmdr1 polymorphisms after treatment with Artesunate–amodiaquine fixed dose combination or artemether–lumefantrine in Liberia. Malar J. 2016;15:452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Sá JM, Twu O, Hayton K, Reyes S, Fay MP, Ringwald P, et al. Geographic patterns of Plasmodium falciparum drug resistance distinguished by differential responses to amodiaquine and Chloroquine. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2009;106:18883–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sisowath C, Petersen I, Veiga MI, Martensson A, Prenji Z, Bjorkman A, et al. In vivo selection of Plasmodium falciparum parasites carrying the Chloroquine-susceptible pfcrt K76 allele after treatment with artemether-lumefantrine in Africa. J Infect Dis. 2009;199:750–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Duraisingh MT, Cowman AF. Contribution of the pfmdr1 gene to antimalarial drug-resistance. Acta Trop. 2005;94:181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Gil JP, Krishna S. pfmdr1 (Plasmodium falciparum multidrug drug resistance gene 1): a pivotal factor in malaria resistance to artemisinin combination therapies. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2017;15:527–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kamugisha E, Jing S, Minde M, Kataraihya J, Kongola G, Kironde F, et al. Efficacy of artemether-lumefantrine in treatment of malaria among under-fives and prevalence of drug resistance markers in Igombe-Mwanza, north-western Tanzania. Malar J. 2012;11:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lim P, Alker AP, Khim N, Shah NK, Incardona S, Doung S, et al. Pfmdr1 copy number and artemisinin derivatives combination therapy failure in falciparum malaria in Cambodia. Malar J. 2009;8:11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Checchi F, Durand R, Balkan S, Vonhm BT, Kollie JZ, Biberson P, et al. High Plasmodium falciparum resistance to chloroquine and sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine in Harper, Liberia: results in vivo and analysis of point mutations. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:664–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Newton PN, Green MD, Mildenhall DC, Plançon A, Nettey H, Nyadong L, et al. Poor quality anti-malarials in Africa—an urgent neglected public health priority. Malar J. 2011;10:352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Mayor A, Serra-Casas E, Bardají A, Sanz S, Puyol L, Cisteró P, et al. Sub-microscopic infections and long-term recrudescence of Plasmodium falciparum in Mozambican pregnant women. Malar J. 2009;8:9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor SM, Mayor A, Mombo-Ngoma G, Kenguele HM, Ouedraogo S, Ndam NT, et al. A quality control program within a clinical trial consortium for PCR protocols to detect Plasmodium species. J Clin Microbiol. 2014;2014(52):2144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ménard D, Khim N, Beghain J, Adegnika AA, Shafiul-Alam M, Amodu O, et al. A worldwide map of Plasmodium falciparum K13-propeller polymorphisms. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2453–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Galatas B, Nhamussua L, Candrinho B, Mabote L, Cisteró P, Gupta H, et al. In-vivo efficacy of chloroquine to clear asymptomatic infections in Mozambican adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with implications for elimination strategies. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gupta H, Macete E, Bulo H, Salvador C, Warsame M, Carvalho E, et al. Drug-resistant polymorphisms and copy numbers in Plasmodium falciparum, Mozambique, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24:40–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Witkowski B, Duru V, Khim N, Ross LS, Saintpierre B, Beghain J, et al. A surrogate marker of piperaquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria: a phenotype-genotype association study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017;17:174–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    International Conference of Harmonization (ICH). Tripartite guideline for good clinical practices E6 (R1), 10th June 1996. Geneva: ICH; 1996.Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Ferney-Voltaire: World Medical Association; 2008.Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Brabin BJ, Romagosa C, Abdelgali S, Menéndez C, Verhoeff FH, McGready R, et al. The sick placenta-the role of malaria. Placenta. 2004;25:359–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Steketee RW, Nahlen BL, Parise ME, Menéndez C. The burden of malaria in pregnancy in malaria-endemic areas. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2001;64(Suppl 1–2):28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Mayor A, Kuma U, Bardají A, Gupta P, Jiménez A, Hamad A, et al. Improved pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to malaria with high antibody levels against Plasmodium falciparum. J Infect Dis. 2013;207:1664–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Galatas B, Bassat Q, Mayor A. Malaria parasites in the asymptomatic: looking for the hay in the haystack. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32:296–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jovel IT, Björkman A, Roper C, Mårtensson, Ursing J. Unexpected selections of Plasmodium falciparum polymorphisms in previously treatment-naïve areas after monthly presumptive administration of three different anti-malarial drugs in Liberia 1976–78. Malar J. 2017;16:113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Checchi F, Balkan S, Vonhm BT, Massaquoi M, Biberson P, Eldin de Pecoulas P, et al. Efficacy of amodiaquine for uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria in Harper, Liberia. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2002;96:670–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Holmgren G, Hamrin J, Svard J, Mårtensson A, Gil JP, Björkman A. Selection of pfmdr1 mutations after amodiaquine monotherapy and amodiaquine plus artemisinin combination therapy in East Africa. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7:562–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Venkatesan M, Gadalla NB, Stepniewska K, Dahal P, Nsanzabana C, Moriera C, et al. Polymorphisms in Plasmodium falciparum chloroquine resistance transporter and multidrug resistance 1 genes: parasite risk factors that affect treatment outcomes for P. falciparum malaria after artemether–lumefantrine and artesunate–amodiaquine. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2014;91:833–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    WHO. Policy recommendation on intermittent preventive treatment during infancy with sulfadoxine–pyrimethamine (SP-IPTi) for Plasmodium falciparum malaria control in Africa. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2010. http://www.who.int/malaria/publications/atoz/policy_recommendation_IPTi_032010/en/. Accessed 3 Jan 2018.
  57. 57.
    Naidoo I, Roper C. Mapping ‘partially resistant’, ‘fully resistant’, and ‘super resistant’ malaria. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:505–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    De Wit E, Falzarano D, Onyango C, Rosenke K, Marzi A, Ochieng M, et al. The merits of malaria diagnostics during an Ebola Virus disease outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2016;22:323–6.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Mayor A, Bardají A, Macete E, Nhampossa T, Fonseca AM, González R, et al. Changing trends in P. falciparum burden, immunity, and disease in pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1607–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Martínez Pérez G, Tarr-Attia CK, Breeze-Barry B, Sarukhan A, Lansana DP, Meyer García-Sípido A, et al. ‘Researchers have love for life’: opportunities and barriers to engage pregnant women in malaria research in post-Ebola Liberia. Malaria J. 2018;17:132.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12936-018-2292-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillermo Martínez-Pérez
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dawoh Peter Lansana
    • 2
  • Senga Omeonga
    • 2
  • Himanshu Gupta
    • 1
  • Bondey Breeze-Barry
    • 2
  • Raquel González
    • 1
  • Azucena Bardají
    • 1
  • Adelaida Sarukhan
    • 1
  • James D. K. Goteh
    • 3
  • Edith Tody
    • 2
  • Pau Cisteró
    • 1
  • Benard Benda
    • 2
  • Juwe D. Kercula
    • 3
  • Fanta D. Kibungu
    • 2
  • Ana Meyer García-Sípido
    • 4
  • Quique Bassat
    • 1
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
  • Christine K. Tarr-Attia
    • 2
  • Alfredo Mayor
    • 1
    • 5
  1. 1.ISGlobal, Hospital Clínic-Universitat de BarcelonaBarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Saint Joseph’s Catholic HospitalMonroviaLiberia
  3. 3.Liberia Medicines and Health Products Regulatory AuthorityMonroviaLiberia
  4. 4.NGO Juan Ciudad FoundationMadridSpain
  5. 5.Centro de Investigação em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM)MaputoMozambique
  6. 6.ICREABarcelonaSpain
  7. 7.Pediatrics Infectious Diseases Unit, Pediatrics DepartmentHospital Sant Joan de Déu (University of Barcelona)BarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations