Advertisement

Microbial Cell Factories

, 18:62 | Cite as

Metabolic engineering of Ashbya gossypii for deciphering the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones

  • Rui Silva
  • Tatiana Q. Aguiar
  • Eduardo Coelho
  • Alberto Jiménez
  • José Luis Revuelta
  • Lucília DominguesEmail author
Open Access
RESEARCH
  • 367 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Lactones are highly valuable cyclic esters of hydroxy fatty acids that find application as pure fragrances or as building blocks of speciality chemicals. While chemical synthesis often leads to undesired racemic mixtures, microbial production allows obtaining optically pure lactones. The production of a specific lactone by biotransformation depends on the supply of the corresponding hydroxy fatty acid, which has economic and industrial value similar to γ-lactones. Hence, the identification and exploration of microorganisms with the rare natural ability for de novo biosynthesis of lactones will contribute to the long-term sustainability of microbial production. In this study, the innate ability of Ashbya gossypii for de novo production of γ-lactones from glucose was evaluated and improved.

Results

Characterization of the volatile organic compounds produced by nine strains of this industrial filamentous fungus in glucose-based medium revealed the noteworthy presence of seven chemically different γ-lactones. To decipher and understand the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones from glucose, we developed metabolic engineering strategies focused on the fatty acid biosynthesis and the β-oxidation pathways. Overexpression of AgDES589, encoding a desaturase for the conversion of oleic acid (C18:1) into linoleic acid (C18:2), and deletion of AgELO624, which encodes an elongase that catalyses the formation of C20:0 and C22:0 fatty acids, greatly increased the production of γ-lactones (up to 6.4-fold; (7.6 ± 0.8) × 103 µg/gCell Dry Weight). Further substitution of AgPOX1, encoding the exclusive acyl-CoA oxidase in A. gossypii, by a codon-optimized POX2 gene from Yarrowia lipolytica, which encodes a specific long chain acyl-CoA oxidase, fine-tuned the biosynthesis of γ-decalactone to a relative production of more than 99%.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the potential of A. gossypii as a model and future platform for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones. By means of metabolic engineering, key enzymatic steps involved in their production were elucidated. Moreover, the combinatorial metabolic engineering strategies developed resulted in improved de novo biosynthesis of γ-decalactone. In sum, these proof-of-concept data revealed yet unknown metabolic and genetic determinants important for the future exploration of the de novo production of γ-lactones as an alternative to biotransformation processes.

Keywords

Volatile organic compounds γ-Lactones Ashbya gossypii De novo biosynthesis Metabolic engineering Fatty acid biosynthesis β-Oxidation 

Abbreviations

VOCs

volatile organic compounds

ORF

open reading frames

Background

Lactones are volatile organic compounds (VOCs) derived from the lipid metabolism. They are chemically classified as cyclic esters of hydroxy fatty acids and find application mainly as pure fragrances and flavours or as building blocks of speciality chemicals [1]. These compounds are naturally present in ripe fruits, such as peach and strawberry, and contribute extensively to their complex aroma and flavour [2, 3]. Consequently, lactones can be found in products of the food and cosmetics industries, reaching a world market volume of hundreds of tons per year [4]. The most relevant lactone commercialized is γ-decalactone, characterized by a strong peach-like odour.

Lactones are still mainly obtained by chemical synthesis [4]. However, this type of process often leads to undesired racemic mixtures, has the problem of not being well accepted by the consumers and withstands serious environmental problems linked to fossil fuels [1, 5]. Therefore, microbial production has appeared as a sustainable biotechnological alternative that offers the possibility to obtain pure lactones.

Microbial production of lactones has been accomplished through biotransformation processes, where an immediate precursor of lactones (an hydroxy fatty acid) is added to the production media to be converted into the desired lactone. The majority of the biotransformation processes explored at the industrial scale use the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica to convert ricinoleic acid (e.g., from castor oil) to γ-decalactone. Following the same enzymatic pathway, the change of the precursor leads to the production of a different lactone [1]. For instance, the use of 10-hydroxystearic acid results in the production of γ-dodecalactone [6]. Thus, in these processes, the production of a particular lactone entirely relies on the availability of the corresponding precursor. This is a major drawback, since these precursors often have economic value and industrial applicability equivalent to that of lactones [7]. Moreover, castor oil, the raw substrate most commonly used, is connected to health and safety issues concerning its extraction from the plant Ricinus communis [8].

Given all of the above, the identification and engineering of microbial systems with the unusual natural ability for de novo biosynthesis of lactones from sustainable and highly accessible carbon sources, such as carbohydrates, constitutes a major challenge to this field. To the extent of our knowledge, only three microbial species were previously studied for the de novo biosynthesis of lactones: two filamentous fungi, Fusarium poae [9] and Trichoderma viride [10, 11]; and one yeast, Sporidiobolus salmonicolor [12, 13]. However, a comprehensive overview of this biosynthetic process is lacking and there is very little information regarding the genetic and enzymatic machinery involved.

Ashbya gossypii (syn. Eremothecium gossypii) is a filamentous fungus of the Saccharomycetaceae family that has been used in the industrial production of riboflavin (vitamin B2) for more than 20 years [14, 15] and which presents important industrial advantages [16]. Moreover, the molecular and in silico tools available for its engineering are steadily growing and omics data are becoming increasingly available [17]. Together with these technical advantages, A. gossypii owns a very rich and heterogeneous metabolism mainly modulated by riboflavin overproduction [18], but being able to produce many other metabolites such as aromatic VOCs [19]. In addition, since riboflavin is produced from the lipids that this fungus is able to biosynthesize [20] and to accumulate [21, 22], A. gossypii shows up as a suitable microbial model for studying and modulating the production of the fatty acid-derived VOCs: lactones. Therefore, in this study, the innate potential of several A. gossypii strains to biosynthesize lactones was evaluated and metabolic engineering strategies towards the fatty acid biosynthesis and the β-oxidation pathways were performed (Fig. 1a) with the objective of deciphering and understanding the intricate de novo biosynthesis of lactones in A. gossypii.
Fig. 1

Metabolic engineering of the de novo biosynthesis of lactones in A. gossypii. a Schematic diagram of the interconnection between the metabolic pathways involved in the de novo biosynthesis of lactones. An acyln−2-CoA represents a fatty acid from which two carbons of the initial chain length were removed after 1 cycle of β-oxidation. b Heterologous overexpression cassette constructed using the Golden-Gate rapid assembly. Grey-circled names represent the genes targeted for engineering. Dashed lines represent multi-reactions. M-CoA: malonyl-CoA; trans-2,3-DA-Coa: trans-2,3-dehydroacyl-CoA

Results and discussion

A. gossypii predominantly produced γ-lactones and higher alcohols as VOCs

A complete metabolic profiling of the VOCs produced by A. gossypii was performed to understand its innate potential to biosynthesize lactones. Nine A. gossypii strains obtained from different collections (Table 1) were screened in glucose-based media (MA2). From this screening, it was possible to identify 31 to 50 different VOCs in each strain. Total production of VOCs was quantified (Fig. 2a) after 48 h of culture, when glucose was already depleted from the medium. By grouping these compounds according to their chemical structure into families of commercially valuable aromas, it was possible to notice that A. gossypii strains produced predominantly higher alcohols and γ-lactones (Fig. 2b). Higher alcohols represented 43–87% of the VOCs produced by A. gossypii, while γ-lactones had a relative representation of 6–57%. On the other hand, the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Y. lipolytica demonstrated an almost exclusive production of higher alcohols and absence of γ-lactones production (Fig. 2b). These results confirm the distinctive trait of A. gossypii for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones.
Table 1

A. gossypii strains used and generated in this work

A. gossypii strains

Relevant genotype

Parental strain

References

ATCC 10895

Sequenced strain; non-engineered

Prof. P. Philippsen, (University of Basel)

MUCL 29450

Non-engineered

[23]

IMI 31268

Non-engineered

[23]

CBS 109.26

Non-engineered

[23]

A5

Non-engineered

[24]

A7

Non-engineered

[24]

A8

Non-engineered

[24]

A9

Non-engineered

[24]

A10

Non-engineered

[24]

DES589

PGPD-AgDES589

ATCC 10895

[27]

elo624Δ

Agelo624Δ

ATCC 10895

[27]

DES589/elo624Δ

PGPD-AgDES589, Agelo624Δ

DES589

This work

YlPOX2

Agpox1Δ::loxP-KanMX4-loxP-PGPD-synYlPOX2

ATCC 10895

This work

DES589/elo624Δ/YlPOX2

PGPD-AgDES589, Agelo624Δ, Agpox1Δ::loxP-KanMX4-loxP-PGPD-synYlPOX2

DES589/elo624Δ

This work

Fig. 2

Quantitative and qualitative VOCs profiling by GC–MS of A. gossypii strains. a Total VOCs production. b Distribution of the VOCs produced by families of aromas according to their chemical structure and their relative presence in each strain. The S. cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D (CEN.PK) and Y. lipolytica W29 were used as controls to help evaluate which VOCs were distinctively produced by A. gossypii. Cultures were carried out in MA2 medium for 48 h. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of at least two biological replicates

Seven chemically different γ-lactones were identified during the growth phase of this fungus (from 24 h onward), namely γ-valerolactone (PubChem CID: 7921), γ-caprolactone (PubChem CID: 12756), γ-octalactone (PubChem CID: 7704), γ-nonalactone (PubChem CID: 7710), γ-decalactone (PubChem CID: 12813), γ-undecalactone (PubChem CID: 7714) and γ-dodecalactone (PubChem CID: 16821). All the γ-lactones here detected were identified using pure standards. Their identification was also confirmed by the presence of the molecular ion peak of m/z 85 in the MS spectrum, which is characteristic of γ-lactones as listed in the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In addition, it can be assumed that A. gossypii did not produce δ-lactones since the molecular ion peak of m/z 99, representative of δ-lactones, was not identified in any of the MS spectra (Table 2). When compared with other microorganisms, the chemical diversity of the γ-lactones biosynthesized by A. gossypii and the relative short time needed for their production (2 days) is noteworthy. Only three (T. viride; 12 days) [11], four (S. salmonicolor; 12 days) [12] and five (F. poae; 8 days) [9] γ-lactones were detected in the other reported lactone-producing fungi. Regarding the other predominant family of VOCs, the two major higher alcohols detected were 2-phenylethanol and isoamyl alcohol (Additional file 1: Fig. S1), which is in accordance with data previously reported for the ATCC 10895 strain [19].
Table 2

MS fragmentation pattern for each γ-lactone

Compound

Characteristic ions

γ-Valerolactone

56 (100) + 85 (69) + 41 (64) + 39 (56) + 43 (38)

γ-Caprolactone

85 (100)+ 57 (25) + 39 (17) + 55 (16) + 56 (13)

γ-Octalactone

85 (100) + 57 (22) + 39 (14) + 41 (11) + 55 (9)

γ-Nonalactone

85 (100)+ 57 (20) + 39 (16) + 41 (13) + 55 (11)

γ-Decalactone

85 (100)+ 57 (20) + 39 (16) + 41 (15) + 55 (15)

γ-Undecalactone

85 (100)+ 57 (27) + 41 (19) + 55 (16) + 128 (12)

γ-Dodecalactone

85 (100) + 39 (24) + 57 (24) + 55 (24) + 41 (23)

Numbers between brackets represent percentages of m/z ions

The major lactone produced by A. gossypii was γ-decalactone

The distinctive nature of A. gossypii for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones from glucose was extensive to all strains tested. However, among the seven γ-lactones biosynthesized, one was clearly produced with major prevalence, γ-decalactone. Compared to the other six γ-lactones (Fig. 3a), γ-decalactone was produced in concentrations two orders of magnitude higher, reaching (2.8 ± 0.6) × 103 µg/gCDW (Fig. 3b). Regarding the six minor γ-lactones detected, their concentration in the medium was not uniformly distributed, being γ-dodecalactone the most representative among them (Fig. 3a). On the other hand, the specific production of γ-lactones was heterogeneous among the different strains (Fig. 3). For instance, the best γ-decalactone-producing strain (concerning average specific production) was strain A9, while strain A10 was superior for γ-dodecalactone biosynthesis. Strain heterogeneity in A. gossypii was previously reported regarding growth rates in different carbon sources [23] and also regarding nucleosides production [24]. Therefore, when investigating A. gossypii for the purpose of its development as a cell factory, the exploration of this specie’s biodiversity gives a more comprehensive understanding of its potential.
Fig. 3

Specific productions (μg/gCDW) of the seven chemically different γ-lactones identified in cultures of A. gossypii. a Production levels of the minor γ-lactones identified. b Production levels of the major γ-lactone identified, γ-decalactone. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of at least two biological replicates

Noteworthy, four of the seven γ-lactones produced by A. gossypii were detected in volumetric concentrations above their odour perception threshold (Additional file 1: Table S1) [25, 26]. Therefore, these active fragrances possibly contribute to the characteristic aroma released from the cultures of this fungus. Specifically, γ-decalactone seems to be the major contributor among the fragrances produced from the A. gossypii strains tested.

Since these results revealed a yet unknown potential of A. gossypii for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones from sugar-based media, the native pathways involved in γ-lactone formation merited further elucidation.

Redirection of the metabolic fluxes of the fatty acid biosynthesis modulated the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones in A. gossypii

Lactones are VOCs derived from the fatty acid metabolism. In natural producers, such as peach (Prunus persica L. Batsch) or strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruits, the direct precursors for lactones biosynthesis are unsaturated fatty acids [2, 3]. In A. gossypii, more than 80% of the total fatty acids accumulated during growth in sugar-based media are unsaturated [22]. Of these, oleic acid (C18:1) represents more than 50% of the total fatty acid composition [27]. A first experimental indication that oleic acid could positively contribute for the biosynthesis of lactones in A. gossypii was obtained from fermentations where glucose was substituted by oleic acid as the carbon source. While the production of γ-decalactone remained similar, oleic acid stimulated the biosynthesis of some minor lactones, such as γ-dodecalactone, which in this condition was produced in amounts 100-fold higher than in glucose-based medium (data not shown). These data indicated oleic acid as an important precursor for the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones and is in good agreement with the fact that oleic acid is the starting point for the production of γ-dodecalactone in biotransformation processes [6]. Furthermore, oleic acid was identified as a central intermediate in the biosynthesis of lactones in the yeast S. salmonicolor [13].

Thus, to confirm this hypothesis and to assess whether the biosynthesis of γ-lactones from glucose could be improved through the redirection of the oleic acid metabolic flux in the A. gossypii’s fatty acid biosynthetic pathway, two genetic modifications were designed: (i) the overexpression of the gene AgDES589, encoding a desaturase for the conversion of oleic acid into linoleic acid (EC 1.14.19.6); and (ii) the deletion of the gene AgELO624, encoding an elongase that catalyses the formation of fatty acids of C20:0 and C22:0 (EC 2.3.1.199) (Fig. 1a). It is worth of noting that the fatty acid profile of A. gossypii is characterized by the presence of 4–8% of fatty acids longer than C18 [22, 27]. The background chosen for the genetic modifications was the best characterized and sequenced strain ATCC 10895 (ATCC).

The engineered strains were tested in AFM sugar-based medium. The transition from MA2 to AFM is justified by superior biomass production obtained with this medium that led to a higher volumetric production of γ-lactones (~ tenfold; Fig. 4a). The time point chosen for the comparisons was 72 h, when all the glucose was already depleted from the medium, because a small but increasing trend in the production of γ-lactones by the ATCC strain was observed between 24 and 72 h (data not shown). In comparison with the parental strain, the overexpression of AgDES589 led to the most pronounced improvement, with a 6.4-fold increase in the specific production of γ-lactones (µg/gCDW; Fig. 4b). However, this overexpression did not increase evenly the production of all the γ-lactones, being this strain (DES589) significantly enriched mainly in γ-octalactone and γ-decalactone, and slightly enriched in γ-dodecalactone (Table 3). AgDES589 was previously shown to be transcriptionally inhibited by the product (linoleic acid) [27]. In addition, enzyme feedback regulation by products was reported for other desaturases [27]. Therefore, gene and/or protein engineering of AgDes589p to eliminate potential regulatory mechanisms could further potentiate the positive effect of this enzyme on the biosynthesis of lactones in A. gossypii.
Fig. 4

Improved biosynthesis of γ-lactones by engineered A. gossypii strains. a Volumetric (μg/L) and b specific (μg/gCDW) production of total γ-lactones. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates. Cultures were carried out in AFM for 72 h. Asterisks represent significant differences to the control (ATCC). **(p < 0.01), ***(p < 0.001) and ****(p < 0.0001)

Table 3

Specific production (μg/gCDW) of different γ-lactones by engineered A. gossypii strains

γ-Lactones

ATCC

DES589

elo624Δ

DES589/elo624Δ

YlPOX2

DES589/elo624Δ/YlPOX2

γ-Octalactone

(1.3 ± 0.2)a × 102

(1.1 ± 0.1)a × 102

(3.2 ± 1.0)d × 101

γ-Nonalactone

6 ± 2

3 ± 0

γ-Decalactone

(1.2 ± 0.1)a × 103

(7.4 ± 0.8)e × 103

98.0 ± 0.2 a

(2.9 ± 0.3)c × 103

(4.9 ± 0.5)e × 103

97.7 ± 0.2 a

(8.8 ± 2.9)a × 102

(5.0 ± 0.5)e × 103

99.3 ± 0.1 e

γ-Undecalactone

3 ± 1

2 ± 0

2 ± 1

γ-Dodecalactone

3 ± 1a

(1.4 ± 0.3)b × 101

2 ± 0a

3 ± 0a

3 ± 1a

2 ± 1a

Underlined values represent the percentage (%) of γ-decalactone regarding the total γ-lactones produced by different high-producing engineered strains. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of three biological replicates. Superscript letters represent significant differences to the control (ATCC) between values of the same column. Superscript letters of underlined values represent significant differences between relative productions. a,b(p < 0.05), a,c(p < 0.01), a,d(p < 0.001) and a,e(p < 0.0001)

(–), not detected and considered 0 for the statistical tests

In turn, strain elo624Δ produced 2.5-fold more lactones, specifically γ-decalactone. This result suggests that very long fatty acids (C20 to C26) are not ideally used as precursors for lactones biosynthesis. This may be related with their saturated nature. Even if shortened in the β-oxidation pathway, these fatty acids would not become an appropriate substrate for AgDes589p. Moreover, as the other elongase encoded in the A. gossypii genome (AgElo586p) is able to elongate fatty acids of C18:0 and C20:0 with poor efficiency [27], its deletion would be expected to further improve lactones’ biosynthesis.

Finally, combination of the two genetic modifications in strain DES589/elo624Δ resulted in a 4.2-fold increase in lactone production, reflected exclusively in the two main γ-lactones produced by strain DES589, γ-octalactone and γ-decalactone (Fig. 4b; Table 3).

Together, these results clearly show that the deregulation of the fatty acid biosynthetic pathway at the C18 level significantly modulated the biosynthesis of γ-lactones in A. gossypii. Oleic acid, the main fatty acid accumulated by A. gossypii, is a central metabolite. As shown in Table 3, the biosynthesis of γ-lactones increased upon blockage of its conversion into longer fatty acids (strain elo624Δ). Moreover, before entering the β-oxidation pathway, oleic acid is very likely to undergo additional chemical modifications. In accordance, the overexpression of the gene AgDES589, which promotes the desaturation of oleic acid (C18:1) into linoleic acid (C18:2) (Fig. 1), was shown to strongly enhance the biosynthesis of γ-lactones. In strawberry fruit, the expression of the gene FaFAD1, encoding a Δ12 fatty acid desaturase, was positively correlated with the γ-decalactone content in fruits [3]. A homologue of FaFAD1 in peach fruit was also connected with lactone biosynthesis [2]. A BLAST® (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) retrieved FaFAD1 as an ortholog of AgDES589. AgDes589p shares 39% amino acid identity with FaFad1p (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). In contrast, no orthologs of the AgDES589 gene were found in the closely related yeast S. cerevisiae or in other post-WGD species of the Saccharomycetaceae. Therefore, AgDES589 is one of the underlying genetic differences conferring A. gossypii the ability for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones.

Interestingly, and just as FaFad1p, two amino acid residues important for the catalytic activity [3] are conserved between AgDes589p and hydroxylases (e.g., R. comunis RcFah12p) or bifunctional hydroxylase/desaturases (Lesquerella fendleri bifunctional LfAh12p), rather than with exclusive desaturases (e.g., Arabidopsis thaliana AtFad2p). This suggests that AgDes589p could be an enzyme with both desaturase and hydroxylase activity. Y. lipolytica, the workhorse used for the production of γ-decalactone by biotransformation, also owns a protein similar to AgDes589p (Additional file 1: Fig. S2). However, this enzyme is only conserved in one of the amino acids critical for the hydroxylase activity. Not owning enzyme(s) able to catalyse the formation of hydroxy fatty acids from oleic acid could be the reason why the production of γ-decalactone by this yeast is only reported from hydroxy fatty acids (e.g., ricinoleic acid) [1], despite the major accumulation of oleic acid inside the cells [28]. Thus, studying the activities of these enzymes is of pivotal importance to further understand their role in the de novo biosynthesis of lactones.

In fruits [2, 3], the biosynthesis of γ-lactones has been proposed to start from the hydration or hydroxylation of unsaturated fatty acids. Considering our data, we propose that the cellular pools of oleic acid (18:1), naturally synthesized and accumulated by A. gossypii [22], are directed to linoleic acid formation (18:2) by the introduction of an additional unsaturation (Fig. 1). In turn, linoleic acid should be hydrated to form hydroxy fatty acids by a yet unidentified enzyme, similarly to what was proposed for fruits [2, 3]. As mentioned above, we cannot exclude that AgDes589p may also possess hydroxylase activity and therefore be able to catalyse the conversion of oleic acid into hydroxy fatty acids. These lactones’ precursors are then shortened at the β-oxidation pathway, generating 4-hydroxy acids of different lengths. Finally, it is widely accepted that γ-lactones are formed by spontaneous lactonisation [1, 2, 3] (Fig. 1).

Combinatorial engineering fine-tuned the biosynthesis of γ-decalactone in A. gossypii

Pure lactones obtained by microbial production are preferred instead of racemic mixtures, because the former facilitates downstream processing [1]. The operations used for that end have been liquid–liquid two-phase extraction and distillation, which are designed to purify one lactone [29, 30]. Since the application as pure fragrances is the most relevant route for their commercialization, fine-tuning the biosynthesis of γ-lactones towards a particular one and therefore create tailored engineered strains is envisaged. Hence, the AgPOX1 gene was replaced by a heterologous overexpression cassette containing a POX2 gene from Y. lipolytica (Fig. 1a). AgPOX1 codifies for the exclusive acyl-CoA oxidase (EC 1.3.3.6) encoded in the A. gossypii genome that catalyses the first reaction of the β-oxidation pathway [22], while YlPOX2 codifies for a specific long chain acyl-CoA oxidase (EC 1.3.3.6) with activity for C11–C18 fatty acids [31]. With this modification, the degradation of fatty acids in the β-oxidation pathway should stop at the C10 level and consequently the biosynthesis of lactones shorter than γ-decalactone would be prevented. Furthermore, this strategy would confirm the role of the β-oxidation pathway in the de novo biosynthesis of lactones by A. gossypii.

The overexpression of YlPOX2 did not produce any significant effect on the total production (Fig. 4) nor on the profile of γ-lactones biosynthesized (Table 3) as compared with the parental strain. However, fine-tuning was accomplished by combining the three genetic modifications in strain DES589/elo624Δ/YlPOX2. This strain presents a similar production of γ-decalactone and lower production of γ-octalactone when compared to strains DES589 and DES589/elo624Δ (Table 3). Noteworthy, the percentage of γ-decalactone produced by this strain was significantly higher than that obtained with the other two overproducer strains, DES589 and DES589/elo624Δ (Table 3). This fine-tuning occurred at an extent that γ-decalactone represented 99.3% of the total γ-lactones produced, confirming that the specificity of the acyl-CoA oxidase in the β-oxidation contributes to the qualitative profile of the final product.

Conclusions

An efficient microorganism for the de novo biosynthesis of lactones should: (i) present a superior ability to transform carbohydrates into fatty acids; (ii) possess the genetic machinery for the conversion of the latter into lactones. Here, we show that A. gossypii fulfils these two requisites. Taken together, these results indicate that the fatty acid biosynthesis and the β-oxidation are the central pathways involved in the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones in A. gossypii. Regarding the first, A. gossypii has been successfully engineered to synthesize biolipids not only from hexoses [32], but also from pentoses [33], expanding its potential as a model for studying the biosynthesis of lactones from different sugars.

Moreover, by means of metabolic engineering, this work elucidates key enzymatic steps for de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones in A. gossypii and shows how this can be further improved and fine-tuned. To the extent of our knowledge, this is the first example of improved de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones achieved by an engineered microorganism. The realization of microbial de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones is of upmost importance, paving the way for the sustainable production of these valuable compounds with a broad range of biological or odorant properties.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

The following chemicals with the corresponding purity were used as standards for the gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC–MS) analysis: 3-methyl-1-butanol (≥ 99.8%), 2-phenylethanol (≥ 99%) and γ-octalactone (> 98%) from Fluka; γ-valerolactone (> 98%) from TCI; γ-caprolactone (> 98%), γ-nonalactone (> 98%), γ-decalactone (≥ 98%), γ-dodecalactone (≥ 97%) and γ-undecalactone (≥ 98%) from Sigma-Aldrich.

Strains and media

The A. gossypii strains used and generated during this study are listed in Table 1. These strains were maintained on agar-solidified AFM (10 g/L yeast extract, 10 g/L tryptone, 1 g/L myo-inositol and 20 g/L glucose) or agar-solidified MA2 medium (20 g/L peptone, 2 g/L yeast extract, 0.6 g/L myo-inositol and 20 g/L glucose, pH 6.8). Spores from A. gossypii were isolated and stored as described previously [34]. The S. cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D (MAT α, MAL2-8c, SUC2; INSA, France) and Y. lipolytica W29 (ATCC 20460:CLIB89) used for comparative purposes during the screening of the volatile compounds (VOCs) were maintained on agar-solidified YPD medium (10 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L peptone and 20 g/L glucose). Escherichia coli DH5α strain served as host for the cloning experiments and was grown on agar-solidified LB medium (10 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L NaCl, pH 7.0) containing, when appropriate, 100 µg/mL ampicillin, 50 µg/mL kanamycin or 100 µg/mL spectinomycin for the selection and maintenance of plasmids.

Culture conditions for the analysis of the VOCs produced by A. gossypii non-engineered strains

As not all the A. gossypii strains are able to sporulate under laboratory conditions [23], the inocula for the screening of VOCs were made as follows. Grown mycelium of each strain was scrapped off an agar-solidified AFM plate and digested with 4 mg/mL lysing enzymes from Trichoderma harzianum (Sigma-Aldrich) in order to obtain more homogeneously dispersed mycelium. Subsequently, this was used to prepare a pre-inoculum in MA2 medium that was grown for 48 h in order to obtain a reproducible and normalized amount of mycelium for all strains. Finally, 1 mL of this pre-inoculum was used to inoculate 250 mL shake-flasks with 50 mL of MA2 medium. A. gossypii cultures were carried out at 28 °C and 200 rpm. After 48 h, the total culture broth was separated by vacuum filtration using Advantec Qualitative Filter Paper (grade 2). The filtrates were immediately filtered again through 0.2 μm membrane filters and stored at − 20 °C until GC–MS analysis. The mycelium retained in the filter paper was washed with distilled water and used for cell dry weight (CDW) determination. CDW was then measured by collecting the mycelium into a pre-weighed dried tube and drying at 105 °C until constant weight (~ 24 h).

Construction of integration cassettes and transformation of A. gossypii

DNA manipulations were made using standard molecular biology procedures [35]. Different transformation cassettes were constructed either for the deletion of native genes or for the overexpression of heterologous genes. For the deletion of the AgELO624 gene (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_212307.1), the entire open reading frame (ORF) was replaced by a cassette comprising a loxP-KanMX-loxP marker that was obtained by PCR amplification using specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S2). These primers were used to introduce recombinogenic flanks for the AgELO624 ORF in both sides, corresponding to regions upstream the start codon and downstream the stop codon of the gene. For the overexpression of the heterologous POX2 gene from Y. lipolytica (NCBI Reference Sequence: XM_505264.1), the ORF was codon-optimized for the A. gossypii codon usage. This gene was obtained from Integrated DNA Technologies (IDT®). This synthetic gene was then amplified using specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S2) and subsequently cloned in a pBluescript SK (−) vector. Besides the codon-optimized YlPOX2 gene, the heterologous overexpression cassette contained two recombinogenic flanks, a selection marker loxP-KanMX-loxP, and the regulatory AgGPD promoter and AgPGK1 terminator sequences (Fig. 1b). The recombinogenic flanks of this cassette were targeted to AgPOX1 locus. Thus, the entire ORF of the AgPOX1 gene (NCBI Reference Sequence: NM_210568.2) was completely replaced by the YlPOX2 overexpression cassette. The AgPOX1 recombinogenic flanks were also PCR-amplified using specific primers (Additional file 1: Table S2) and cloned in a pBluescript SK (−) vector. The modules comprising the selection marker and the regulatory sequences were amplified and cloned previously [22]. Finally, all the modules of the overexpression cassette were verified by DNA sequencing and assembled together with the acceptor vector using the BsaI restriction enzyme, accordingly with the Golden-Gate method previously described [36, 37]. Before transformation in A. gossypii, the heterologous overexpression cassette (Fig. 1b) was linearized by enzymatic restriction with SapI.

Spores of A. gossypii ATCC 10895 were transformed with the corresponding cassettes using the Cre-loxP system [38], which enabled the elimination and reuse of the selection marker through the expression of a Cre recombinase in A. gossypii as described previously [39]. The primary heterokaryotic transformants were selected on agar-solidified MA2/AFM containing 250–300 μg/L geneticin (G418). Selection of A. gossypii homokaryotic clones was performed through the germination of uninucleated haploid spores obtained from the primary heterokaryotic transformants on agar-solidified MA2/AFM-G418. The correct genomic integration of each cassette as well as the homokaryotic genotype of each clone were confirmed by analytical PCR and DNA sequencing. For this purpose, a pin-head of mycelium from single colonies was suspended in 30 μL of extraction buffer (0.05 M carbonate buffer pH 6.9, 2% (w/v) PVP 40, 0.2% (w/v) BSA and 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20) and incubated for 10 min at 100 °C. Afterwards, the tubes were centrifuged at maximum speed. The supernatant was used as template in the PCR reactions using the specific primers listed in Additional file 1: Table S2.

Culture conditions for the analysis of the de novo biosynthesis of γ-lactones by A. gossypii engineered strains

The cultures of the engineered strains were initiated with the inoculation of 107 spores in 50 mL of AFM and carried out in 250 mL shake-flasks at 28 °C and 200 rpm. After 72 h, the mycelium and filtrate were collected and treated as described above.

Volatiles extraction and analysis by GC–MS

Volatiles were analysed by GC–MS after extraction from 8 mL samples with 400 µL of dichloromethane, with 4-nonanol as internal standard. A gas chromatograph Varian 3800 with a 1079 injector and an ion-trap mass spectrometer Varian Saturn 2000 was used. 1 µL injections were made in splitless mode (30 s) in a Sapiens-Wax MS column (30 m; 0.15 mm; 0.15 µm film thickness, Teknokroma). Carrier gas was helium 49 (Praxair) at a constant 1.3 mL/min flow. Detector was set to electronic impact mode with an ionization energy of 70 eV, a mass acquisition range from 35 to 260 m/z and 610 ms acquisition interval. Oven temperature was initially set to 60 °C for 2 min and then raised from 60 to 234 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, raised from 234 to 260 °C at 5 °C/min and finally maintained at 260 °C for 10 min. Injector temperature was 250 °C with 30 mL/min split flow. Compounds were identified using MS Workstation version 6.9 (Varian) software, by comparing mass spectra and retention indices with those of pure standards mentioned above. Volatiles were quantified as 4-nonanol equivalents.

Statistical analyses

GraphPad Prism for IOS version 6.0 was used to carry out the statistical analyses. Differences to a control strain were analysed by one-way ANOVA followed by Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. When no control strain is indicated, the analyses were made by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test. Unless indicated otherwise, statistical significance was established at p < 0.05 for the comparisons.

Notes

Author’ contributions

LD supervised the research. RS, TQA and LD conceived the project and planned the experimental design. RS performed most of the experiments. TQA participated in the fermentations. EC performed the volatiles extraction and GC–MS analysis. AJ and JLR co-planned and supervised the strains construction. RS, TQA, and LD analysed the results and wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to scientific discussion. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and the Additional file 1.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Funding

This study was supported by: the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) under the scope of the strategic funding of UID/BIO/04469/2019 unit and COMPETE 2020 (POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006684) (Post-Doc grant to T. Q. Aguiar and Ph.D. grant to E. Coelho), Ph.D. Grant PD/BD/113812/2015 to R. Silva (Doctoral Program in Applied and Environmental Microbiology), and BioTecNorte operation (NORTE-01-0145-FEDER-000004) funded by the European Regional Development Fund under the scope of Norte2020-Programa Operacional Regional do Norte; the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (BIO2014-56930-P and BIO2017-88435-R) and Junta de Castilla y León (SA016P17) to A. Jiménez and J.L. Revuelta.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary material

12934_2019_1113_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1 mb)
Additional file 1: Fig. S1. Specific productions (μg/gCDW) of the two major higher alcohols identified in cultures of non-engineered A. gossypii strains. Production levels of (A) 2-phenylethanol and (B) isoamyl alcohol. Data are presented as mean ± standard deviation of at least two biological replicates. Table S1. Lactones produced by A. gossypii non-engineered strains above their odour perception threshold. Values of the thresholds either in complex (e.g., wine) or simple (e.g., aqueous solutions) samples were retrieved from the literature [25, 26]. Data are presented as mean of at least two biological replicates. (−), not detected or detected at concentrations below the odour perception threshold of the compound. Fig. S2. Comparison of the amino acid sequence of A. gossypii AgDes589p with other fatty acid desaturases, hydroxylases and bifunctional desaturase/hydroxylases. Asterisks (*) represent conserved residues, colons (:) represent residues with strong similar properties and periods (.) represent residues with weak similar properties. The amino acid residues that differ between oleate desaturases and hydroxylases are indicated in boxes. Red boxes represent the two important amino acids residues for the catalytic activity that are conserved between AgDes589p and hydroxylases or bifunctional enzymes. Accession numbers for the sequences are: F. x ananassa desaturase FaFAD1p (KF887973), Y. lipolytica YlYALI0B10153p (XP_500707.1), A. thaliana AtFAD2p (AAA32782), R. comunis hydroxylase RcFAH12 (AAC49010), (MDP0000288297) and L. fendleri bifunctional desaturase/hydroxylase LFAH12 (AAC32755). Table S2. Primers used in this work. Lower case sequences correspond to homologous recombination sites. Recognition sequences for restriction enzymes are underlined.

References

  1. 1.
    Kourist R, Hilterhaus L. Microbial lactone synthesis based on renewable resources. In: Kamm B, editor. Microorganisms in biorefineries. Microbiology monographs. Berlin: Springer; 2015.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sánchez G, Venegas-Calerón M, Salas JJ, Monforte A, Badenes ML, Granell A. An integrative “omics” approach identifies new candidate genes to impact aroma volatiles in peach fruit. BMC Genomics. 2013;23:343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sánchez-Sevilla JF, Cruz-Rus E, Valpuesta V, Botella MA, Amaya I. Deciphering gamma-decalactone biosynthesis in strawberry fruit using a combination of genetic mapping, RNA-Seq and eQTL analyses. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Braga A, Guerreiro C, Belo I. Generation of flavors and fragrances through biotransformation and de novo synthesis. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2018;11:2217–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hanko EKR, Denby CM, Sànchez I, Nogué V, Lin W, Ramirez KJ, et al. Engineering β-oxidation in Yarrowia lipolytica for methyl ketone production. Metab Eng. 2018;48:52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    An J, Joo Y, Oh D. New biotransformation process for production of the fragrant compound γ-dodecalactone from 10-hydroxystearate by permeabilized Waltomyces lipofer cells. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2013;79:2636–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Patel VR, Dumancas GG, Viswanath LKK, Maples R, Subong BJJ. Castor oil: properties, uses, and optimization of processing parameters in commercial production. Lipid Insights. 2016;9:1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Audi J, Belson M, Patel M, Schier J, Osterloh J. Ricin poisoning: a comprehensive review. JAMA. 2005;294:2342–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Latrasse A, Guichard E, Piffaut C, Fournier N, Dufossé L. Chirality of the γ-lactones formed by Fusarium poae INRA 45. Chirality. 1993;5:79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins RP, Halim AF. Characterization of the major aroma constituent of the fungus Trichoderma viride. J Agric Food Chem. 1972;20:437–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fadel HHM, Mahmoud MG, Asker MMS, Lotfy SN. Characterization and evaluation of coconut aroma produced by Trichoderma viride EMCC-107 in solid state fermentation on sugarcane bagasse. Electron J Biotechnol. 2015;18:5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dufossé L, Féron G, Latrasse A, Guichard E, Spinnler HE. Chirality of the gamma-lactones produced by Sporidiobolus salmonicolor grown in two different media. Chirality. 1997;9:667–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Haffner T, Tressl R. Biosynthesis of (R)-γ-decanolactone in the yeast Sporobolomyces odorus. J Agric Food Chem. 1996;44:1218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Revuelta JL, Ledesma-Amaro R, Lozano-Martinez P, Díaz-Fernández D, Buey RM, Jiménez A. Bioproduction of riboflavin: a bright yellow history. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;44:659–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schwechheimer SK, Park EY, Revuelta JL, Becker J, Wittmann C. Biotechnology of riboflavin. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;100:2107–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aguiar TQ, Silva R, Domingues L. Ashbya gossypii beyond industrial riboflavin production: a historical perspective and emerging biotechnological applications. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1774–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Aguiar TQ, Silva R, Domingues L. New biotechnological applications for Ashbya gossypii: challenges and perspectives. Bioengineered. 2017;8:309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Silva R, Aguiar TQ, Oliveira C, Domingues L. Physiological characterization of a pyrimidine auxotroph exposes link between uracil phosphoribosyltransferase regulation and riboflavin production in Ashbya gossypii. New Biotechnol. 2019;50:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ravasio D, Wendland J, Walther A. Major contribution of the Ehrlich pathway for 2-phenylethanol/rose flavor production in Ashbya gossypii. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:833–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Schwechheimer SK, Becker J, Peyriga L, Portais JC, Sauer D, Müller R, et al. Improved riboflavin production with Ashbya gossypii from vegetable oil based on 13C metabolic network analysis with combined labeling analysis by GC/MS, LC/MS, 1D, and 2D NMR. Metab Eng. 2018;47:357–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Stahmann KP, Kupp C, Feldmann SD, Sahm H. Formation and degradation of lipid bodies found in the riboflavin-producing fungus Ashbya gossypii. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1994;42:121–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Ledesma-Amaro R, Santos MA, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL. Strain design of Ashbya gossypii for single-cell oil production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:1237–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ribeiro O, Domingues L, Penttilä M, Wiebe MG. Nutritional requirements and strain heterogeneity in Ashbya gossypii. J Basic Microbiol. 2012;52:582–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ledesma-Amaro R, Buey RM, Revuelta JL. Increased production of inosine and guanosine by means of metabolic engineering of the purine pathway in Ashbya gossypii. Microb Cell Fact. 2015;14:58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Coelho E, Vilanova M, Genisheva Z, Oliveira JM, Teixeira JA, Domingues L. Systematic approach for the development of fruit wines from industrially processed fruit concentrates, including optimization of fermentation parameters, chemical characterization and sensory evaluation. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2015;62:1043–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jackson RS. Olfactory sensations. In: Wine tasting: a professional handbook, 2nd ed. Academic Press: Burlington; 2009.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ledesma-Amaro R, Santos MA, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL. Tuning single-cell oil production in Ashbya gossypii by engineering the elongation and desaturation systems. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2014;111:1782–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blazeck J, Hill A, Liu L, Knight R, Miller J, Pan A, et al. Harnessing Yarrowia lipolytica lipogenesis to create a platform for lipid and biofuel production. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Thomas WD. Purification of butyrolactone. United States Patent No. 4,851,085. 2013.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Blaser HU, Federsel H. Asymmetric catalysis on industrial scale: challenges, approaches and solutions. 2nd ed. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH; 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wang HJ, Le Dall MT, Wach Y, Laroche C, Belin JM, Gaillardin C, et al. Evaluation of acyl coenzyme A oxidase (Aox) isozyme function in the n-alkane-assimilating yeast Yarrowia lipolytica. J Bacteriol. 1999;181:5140–8.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lozano-Martínez P, Buey RM, Ledesma-Amaro R, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL. Engineering Ashbya gossypii strains for de novo lipid production using industrial by-products. Microb Biotechnol. 2016;10:425–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Díaz-Fernández D, Lozano-Martínez P, Buey RM, Revuelta JL, Jiménez A. Utilization of xylose by engineered strains of Ashbya gossypii for the production of microbial oils. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2017;10:3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Silva R, Aguiar TQ, Oliveira R, Domingues L. Light exposure during growth increases riboflavin production, reactive oxygen species accumulation and DNA damage in Ashbya gossypii riboflavin-overproducing strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 2019;19:foy114.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Domingues L. PCR: methods and protocols. 1st ed. New York: Springer; 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Engler C, Gruetzner R, Kandzia R, Marillonnet S. Golden gate shuffling: a one pot DNA shuffling method based on type IIs restriction enzymes. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e5553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ledesma-Amaro R, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL. Pathway grafting for polyunsaturated fatty acids production in Ashbya gossypii through Golden-Gate rapid assembly. ACS Synth Biol. 2018;7:2340–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Aguiar TQ, Dinis C, Domingues L. Cre-loxP-based system for removal and reuse of selection markers in Ashbya gossypii targeted engineering. Fungal Genet Biol. 2014;68:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Serrano-Amatriain C, Ledesma-Amaro R, López-Nicolás R, Ros G, Jiménez A, Revuelta JL. Folic acid production by engineered Ashbya gossypii. Metab Eng. 2016;38:473–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CEB-Centre of Biological EngineeringUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Metabolic Engineering Group, Department of Microbiology and GeneticsUniversity of SalamancaSalamancaSpain

Personalised recommendations