Advertisement

BMC Veterinary Research

, 15:152 | Cite as

Systemic tuberculosis by MYCOBACTERIUM BOVIS in a free-ranging MARSICAN brown bear (URSUS ARCTOS MARSICANUS): a Case report

  • Rosario Fico
  • Alessia MariacherEmail author
  • Alessia Franco
  • Claudia Eleni
  • Erika Ciarrocca
  • Maria Lodovica Pacciarini
  • Antonio Battisti
Open Access
Case Report
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Bacteriology

Abstract

Background

Mycobacterium bovis is known to have a wide host range and has been isolated from numerous free-ranging wildlife species, carnivores included. In bears, M. bovis has been previously reported only from a culture of pooled lymph nodes of a black bear (Ursus americanus) in the absence of lesions. The aims of this study were to describe gross and microscopic pathological findings of M. bovis tuberculosis in a deceased Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus).

Case presentation

In March 2014, an adult female Marsican brown bear was found in the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Italy) showing severe non-specific clinical signs. The animal died soon after its discovery and the carcass was submitted to post-mortem examination to identify the cause of death. The bear was diagnosed with a severe Mycobacterium bovis infection, with both pathological and microbiological aspects suggesting ongoing generalization. A presumptive diagnosis of mycobacterial infection was initially made based on gross findings. Histopathology showed the presence of acid-fast bacilli in all sampled tissues along with poorly organized granulomatous lesions. Slow-growing Mycobacterium sp. was isolated from multiple organs (intestine, mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, spleen, lung and kidneys). The PCR and sequencing algorithm identified the Mycobacterium sp. isolate as M. bovis. Spoligotyping demonstrated that the M. bovis isolate belonged to spoligotype SB0120.

Conclusions

This is the first report of lethal M. bovis tuberculosis infection in a free-ranging brown bear. This pathogen could have serious adverse effects in an endangered relic population such as the Marsican brown bear. Stricter application of health regulations in force, surveillance of M. bovis infections in wild ungulates and carnivore scavengers, along with dismissal of supplementary feeding points intended for cattle or wildlife, are warranted to control the presence of bovine tuberculosis in wild and domestic animals in protected areas.

Keywords

Bovine tuberculosis Marsican brown bear Mycobacterium bovis 

Abbreviations

CO2

Carbon dioxide

GC-MS

Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry

HE

Hematoxylin-Eosin

IUCN

International Union for Conservation of Nature

PCR

Polymerase Chain Reaction

Background

Mycobacterium bovis, causative agent of bovine tuberculosis, is known to have a wide host range and is often maintained in complex transmission cycles at the interface where wildlife and livestock meet [1]. M. bovis has been previously isolated from numerous free-ranging non-cervid wildlife species, carnivores included [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]. Nonetheless, in bears, M. bovis was only cultured from pooled lymph nodes of a black bear (Ursus americanus) in the absence of gross or histological lesions [2].

The aims of this study were to describe gross and microscopic pathological findings of M. bovis tuberculosis in a deceased Marsican brown bear (Ursus arctos marsicanus). The report also aims to shed light on possible source of infection, providing identification and molecular characterization of the etiological agent.

Case presentation

In March 2014, an adult female Marsican brown bear died in the Province of L’Aquila, in the territory of the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park (Italy). The animal was found alive and showing severe, non-specific clinical signs (dyspnoea, hyper salivation and disorientation) and died soon after its discovery by park rangers. The carcass was submitted by local authorities for forensic post-mortem examination to ascertain the cause of death and to rule out any illegal activities.

A forensic necroscopic exam was performed including complete skinning of the carcass, skull opening and photographic documentation with metric reference. The bear was in fair body condition. Pale mucous membranes were observed at external examination. After skinning, a fair amount of subcutaneous adipose tissue was observed, adequate to the season. At the opening of abdominal cavity, mild peritonitis and peritoneal serohemorrhagic effusion were observed. Small and large intestines were markedly thickened and on the external surface of rectum wall, coalescing necrotic plaques were seen, extending to an adjacent lymph node (Fig. 1, a). The stomach and intestines were empty. A diffuse mild catarrhal gastritis was observed in the fundic region. All mesenteric lymph nodes were massively enlarged and their normal anatomy at cut surfaces was effaced by extensive necrosis (Fig. 1, b). The liver was enlarged and the spleen was pale and enlarged. Three placental scars were observed in the uterus. Gross findings of the upper airways included greenish rhinopharyngeal catarrhal exudate and laryngeal oedema and congestion. In the thoracic cavity, pulmonary oedema and subpleural petechiae were observed (Fig. 1, c). After skull opening, meningeal hyperaemia was observed (Fig. 1, d). A presumptive diagnosis of systemic tuberculosis was initially made based on gross findings, and later confirmed by histology and microbiology.
Fig. 1

Marsican brown bear, necroscopic examination. a) Necrotic plaques on the external surface of the rectum wall, extending to the adjacent lymph node; b) Cut surfaces of enlarged mesenteric lymph nodes, showing extensive necrosis; c) Pulmonary oedema and multifocal subpleural petechiae; d) Meningeal hyperaemia

Samples were collected from all the major organs and from all the tissues affected by gross lesions. Tissue samples for histopathology were formalin-fixed, embedded in paraffin wax, sectioned at 4 μm and stained with HE and Ziehl-Neelsen. Histologically, massive transmural necrosis was observed in the intestine wall with multifocal extension in the peritoneal serosa (Fig. 2, a). Multiple granulomatous foci suggestive of tuberculosis, showing poor organization and composed of lymphocytes, plasma cells, macrophages and few neutrophils, were found mixed with necrotic debris. Similar lesions were also present in the mesenteric lymph nodes. In liver, kidneys and brain, granulomatous foci were respectively seen in the periportal area, in the interstitium and in the meninges (Fig. 2, b). A mild multifocal perisplenitis was also detected. Acid-fast bacilli were observed within tubercles, both in macrophages and extracellularly (Fig. 2, c) in all the examined organs (skin, lymph nodes, liver, spleen, intestines, peritoneum, kidneys, lung, myocardium and brain).
Fig. 2

Histopathology. a) Rectum - massive necrosis of the intestinal wall, with infiltration (arrow) and multifocal severe extension in the peritoneal serosa (asterisk) (hematoxylin and eosin, magnification 5x, scale bar = 500 μm); b) Meninges - meningeal granuloma (hematoxylin and eosin, magnification 20x, scale bar = 100 μm); c) Lymph nodes - acid-fast bacilli, brilliant pink in color, both in macrophages and extracellularly (Ziehl-Neelsen, magnification 100x, scale bar = 20 μm)

Samples from multiple organs and fluids (liver, spleen, pooled lymph nodes, intestines, kidneys, lung, brain, intracardial blood clot and peritoneal effusion) were submitted to cultures for bacterial pathogens, including Mycobacteria. Cultures for bacterial pathogens were performed on blood agar incubated at 37 °C in aerobic, capnophilic (10% CO2 atmosphere) and anaerobic conditions following standard procedures. Cultures for Mycobacterium spp. were performed on enrichment liquid (Middlebrook 7H9) and solid (Coletsos + ossein) media, both added with pyruvate, following international recommendations [10], with an incubation at 37 °C in aerobic conditions for up to 12 weeks. Identification at species level of Mycobacterium spp. was obtained by an algorithm including a multiplex PCR approach for Mycobacterium genus, M. tuberculosis-complex [11] and sequencing the gyrB gene [12]. Spoligotyping was performed as previously described [13]. Slow-growing Mycobacterium sp. was isolated from multiple organs (intestine, mesenteric lymph nodes, liver, spleen, lung and kidneys). The PCR and sequencing algorithm identified the Mycobacterium sp. isolate at species level as M. bovis. Spoligotyping demonstrated that the M. bovis isolate belonged to spoligotype SB0120. Since this is the dominant profile in the Italian cattle population [14], for further molecular characterization and for purposes of molecular epidemiology, a Variable Tandem Repeat approach with a “core” group 12 loci as previously described [14]. The allelic pattern obtained was the following: ETR-A: 5, ETR-B: 5; ETR-C: 5; ETR-D: 3; ETR-E: 3, MIRU26: 5; QUB11A: 10, QUB11B: 4; QUB15: 3; QUB1895: 4, QUB26: 4; QUB3232: 6.

This pattern was identical to isolates from an outbreak in semi-free-ranging bovine animals, which had been first detected in June 2012 in the same municipality.

Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans was isolated from the intracardial clot and peritoneal fluid.

Liver samples were submitted to toxicological analysis (Gas Chromatography - Mass Spectrometry, GC-MS) for organophosphate, carbamate, and organochlorine pesticides with negative results.

Discussion and conclusions

The Marsican brown bear is classified as a critically endangered species by the International Union for Conservation of Nature IUCN [15]. The estimated size of this isolated population is of 40–50 individuals living in Central Italy, concentrated in the Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park [16]. Conservation issues of Marsican brown bear are mainly due to habitat reduction and fragmentation [17, 18]. Furthermore, despite current protective legislation, illegal killings by poaching and poisoning, along with vehicle collisions, represent the main causes of mortality in this species [19]. In recent years, growing attention is paid to the potential role of various pathogens in the health status of the Marsican bear population. However, mortality attributed to infectious diseases in free-ranging brown bears seems to be an overall rare occurrence [20].

In bears, Mycobacteria have been seldom isolated. M. avium paratuberculosis was reported as cause of fatal disease in two brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Slovakia [21], and an atypical mycobacterium, M. fortuitum, was isolated from a brown bear bite wound in a man in Finland [22]. M. bovis was only cultured from pooled lymph nodes of a black bear (Ursus americanus) but gross or histological lesions were not present [2].

The diagnosis of tuberculosis in free-ranging wildlife relies on post-mortem examination along with histopathology and microbiology [23]. In the case herein presented, the bear was diagnosed with a severe systemic tuberculosis caused by M. bovis infection, with both pathological and microbiological aspects suggesting ongoing generalization. A presumptive diagnosis of tuberculosis was initially made based on gross findings, especially on the enlarged necrotic mesenteric lymph nodes and rectal necrotic plaques. Grossly, fibrotic capsules around necrotic tissue or firm nodules on organs surface were lacking in the examined organs. Histopathology confirmed the tubercular nature of infection, showing in every sampled organ specific granulomatous lesion with poorly organized features, along with the presence of acid-fast bacilli, both in the macrophages and extracellularly. The ultimate cause of death of this bear has to be attributed to M. bovis, with possible concurrent opportunistic infection with S. schleiferi subsp. coagulans, known to be associated with Caniformia (Canoidea) hosts [24, 25].

Gross lesions of M. bovis infection in cattle are typically caseous and mineralised with histology showing central necrosis surrounded by granulomatous reaction and fibrosis, but lesions in wildlife may differ [23]. Since tuberculosis is a slowly progressive disease, M. bovis have been isolated from pooled lymph nodes or other organs in wild carnivores even in the absence of lesions [2, 26, 27]. The case herein described presented with poorly organised lesions, similarly to what have been observed in other carnivores [7, 8, 28, 29, 30]. Considering the presence of lesions in multiple organs with different severity stages (ranging from hyperaemia to extensive caseous necrosis), we hypothesized that the mycobacterial infection had a slow course. Late generalisation of the infection via haematogenous spread and concurrent opportunistic infection with Gram-positive bacteria probably intervened in a short span of time, thus justifying the fair body condition of the bear.

Based on massive necrosis of mesenteric lymph nodes and intestinal walls, tuberculosis was thought to be acquired by ingestion. As for the tracing-back of the source of exposure and infection, it was ascertained that Mycobacterium bovis-infected cattle had been grazing in the home range of this bear since 2012. Some infected bovines died on pastures and were consumed by scavengers. The epidemiological data were in agreement with the molecular data: the M. bovis isolates from the bear and from the cattle herd, when submitted to further molecular characterization, were found indistinguishable both in the spoligotype and in the 12 markers VNTR profile. At present, this genotype does not seem prevalent in Italy. In the database (2008–2018) of the National Reference Laboratory for Bovine Tuberculosis (Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia ed. Emilia-Romagna) with more than 3800 isolates of M. bovis/M. caprae from around 2260 outbreaks/cases of bovine tuberculosis, this genotype was found only in 6 bovine farms (1 in Abruzzo, 1 in Latium, 1 in Campania, 2 in Apulia, 1 in Calabria), in 15 farms of water buffalo (mainly from Campania) and in one pigs farm in Sicily. Spillover from cattle to bears may have serious implications for the conservation of some relic populations or subspecies of the brown bear, especially in Western Europe.

Eradication campaigns have been conducted in Italy in domestic cattle for decades according to EU and national legislation, thus the overall prevalence of bovine tuberculosis is very low. Nevertheless, in some areas of the Country, cattle population is not tuberculosis-free. In the Abruzzo, Lazio and Molise National Park, traditional farming practices are in place that can affect the risk of transmission of pathogens between domestic cattle and wildlife. Firstly, free-roaming cattle coexists on pastures with both wild ungulates and carnivores. Trades and the practice of summer translocation of cattle to mountain pastures should be fully considered among risk factors for the introduction of bovine tuberculosis in protected areas, similarly to what have been assessed for cattle breakdowns in Northern Italy [31]. Moreover, supplementary feeding points for domestic ungulates in the Park, where carrots or apples are fed to the animals, represent food sources shared between domestic ungulates and wildlife species, posing additional risk of pathogens spillover or spillback [32, 33].

The prevalence of tuberculosis in free-ranging animals has been reported to be related to cases of tuberculosis in domestic cattle [23]. Wild species, especially ungulates, are susceptible to M. bovis tuberculosis and could act as reservoirs. Carnivore populations are rather considered spillover hosts that become incidentally infected, therefore they are unlikely to maintain the disease without a continued source of re-exposure, e. g. by preys or scavenged carcasses [34]. Exceptions exist, like some badger populations in England and Ireland, in which the ecology, the social behaviour and densities of this species and its interactions with cattle herds, although still debated, have been deemed to play an important role in the maintenance of infection [35]. In this respect, horizontal (bear-to-bear) transmission of M. bovis seems unlikely because routes of horizontal transmission usually include close contact activities such as den sharing, playing, fighting or mating [8], activities that are infrequent in bears as an elusive and solitary species with a low population density.

The case herein reported is the first case of lethal M. bovis infection and systemic disease in a free-ranging brown bear. Tuberculosis from M. bovis does not pose a serious threat to most wild carnivore populations, but this pathogen could have serious adverse effects in a small and fragmented population such being the case of the Marsican brown bear.

Since M. bovis is a well-known zoonotic pathogen and may not be an infrequent finding in wildlife, personal protection equipment when dealing with such forensic cases should always be used as part of biosafety good practices.

Stricter application of health regulations in force is warranted to control the presence of bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging cattle in protected areas. Surveillance of M. bovis infections in wild ungulates in the Park, along with wildlife monitoring to assess occurrence of infection in carnivore scavengers, needs to be enhanced to allow a more accurate assessment of the problem. Supplementary feeding points intended for domestic or wild animals should be discontinued in National Parks or protected areas where wildlife and domestic animals share the same pastures, to decrease the risk of pathogens transmission between livestock and wildlife.

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors wish to thank Dr. Antonio Carrara, President of Abruzzo Lazio and Molise National Park, and Dr. Leonardo Gentile, Head of the Park Veterinary Service, for their enduring effort in the conservation of Marsican brown bear. We also thank Daniela Loda, Tamara Cerci, Luigi Sorbara for technical assistance and Dr. Giovanni Melini for unceasing motivation.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Availability of data and materials

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Authors’ contributions

RF, AM and EC performed the forensic necroscopic examination. CE performed the histological examinations. AB, AF and MLP performed bacteriological exams. AM and AB were major contributors in writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.
    Nugent G. Maintenance, spillover and spillback transmission of bovine tuberculosis in multi-host wildlife complexes: a New Zealand case study. Vet Microbiol. 2011;151:34–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruning-Fann CS, Schmitt SM, Fitzgerald SD, Fierke JS, Friedrich PD, Kaneene JB, Clarke KA, Butler KL, Payeur JB, Whipple DL, Cooley TM, Miller JM, Muzo DP. Bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging carnivores from Michigan. J Wildl Dis. 2001;37:58–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schmitt SM, O’Brien DJ, Bruning-Fann CS, Fitzgerald SD. Bovine tuberculosis in Michigan wildlife and livestock. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;969:262–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Aranaz A, De Juan L, Montero N, Sánchez C, Galka M, Delso C, Alvarez J, Romero B, Bezos J, Vela AI, Briones V, Mateos A, Domínguez L. Bovine tuberculosis (Mycobacterium bovis) in wildlife in Spain. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42:2602–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Daly M, Diegel KL, Fitzgerald SD, Schooley A, Berry DE, Kaneene JB. Patterns of antimicrobial susceptibility in Michigan wildlife and bovine isolates of Mycobacterium bovis. J Vet Diagn Investig. 2006;18:401–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Michel AL, Bengis RG, Keet DF, Hofmeyr M, Klerk LM, Cross PC, Jolles AE, Cooper D, Whyte IJ, Buss P, Godfroid J. Wildlife tuberculosis in south African conservation areas: implications and challenges. Vet Microbiol. 2006;112:91–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Drewe JA, Foote AK, Sutcliffe RL, Pearce GP. Pathology of Mycobacterium bovis infection in wild Meerkats (Suricata suricatta). J Comp Pathol. 2009;140:12e24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pollock C. Mycobacterial infection in the ferret. Vet Clin Exot Anim. 2012;15:121–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Brien DJ, Fierke JS, Cooley TM, Fitzgerald SD, Cosgrove MK, Schmitt SM. Performance of diagnostic tests for bovine tuberculosis in north American furbearers and implications for surveillance. Transbound Emerg Dis. 2013;60:67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    OIE. Manual of Diagnostic Tests and Vaccines for Terrestrial Animals. Ch. 2.4.7. Bovine tuberculosis. 2009.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kulski JK, Khinsoe C, Pryce T, Christiansen K. Use of a multiplex PCR to detect and identify Mycobacterium avium and M. intracellulare in blood culture fluids of AIDS patients. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33:668–74.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niemann S, Harmsen D, Rüsch-Gerdes S, Richter E. Differentiation of clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex isolates by gyrB DNA sequence polymorphism analysis. J Clin Microbio. 2000;38:3231–4.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kamerbeek J, Schouls L, Kolk A, van Agterveld M, van Soolingen D, Kuijper S, Bunschoten A, Molhuizen H, Shaw R, Goyal M, van Embden J. Simultaneous detection and strain differentiation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for diagnosis and epidemiology. J Clin Microbiol. 1997;35:907–14.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boniotti MB, Goria M, Loda D, Garrone A, Benedetto A, Mondo A, Tisato E, Zanoni M, Zoppi S, Dondo A, Tagliabue S, Bonora S, Zanardi G, Pacciarini ML. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis strains isolated in Italy from 2000 to 2006 and evaluation of variable-number tandem repeats for geographically optimized genotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:636–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McLellan BN, Proctor MF, Huber D, Michel S. Brown bear (Ursus arctos) isolated populations. In: supplementary material to Ursus arctos Redlisting account. The IUCN red list of threatened species. 2016. http://www.iucnredlist.org/species/pdf/121229971/attachment. Accessed 19 Feb 2019.
  16. 16.
    Ciucci P, Gervasi V, Boitani L, Boulanger J, Paetkau D, Prive R, Tosoni E. Estimating abundance of the remnant Apennine brown bear population using multiple non-invasive genetic data sources. J Mammal. 2015;96:206–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lorenzini R, Posillico M, Gentile L, Fico R, Sammarone L. La conservazione dell’orso bruno (Ursus arctos) in Appennino: il supporto della genetica non invasiva. Hystrix It J Mamm. 2004;15:69–85.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Posillico M, Meriggi A, Pagnin E, Lovari S, Russo L. A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biol Conserv. 2004;118:141–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ciucci P, Boitani L. The Apennine brown bear: a critical review of its status and conservation problems. Ursus. 2008;19:130–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Morner T, Eriksson H, Brojer C, Nilsson K, Uhlhorn H, Agren E, Hard af Segerstad C, Jansson DS. Gavier-widen D. diseases and mortality in free-ranging brown bear (Ursus arctos), gray wolf (Canis lupus), and wolverine (Gulo gulo) in Sweden. J Wildl Dis. 2005;41:298–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kopecna M, Ondrus S, Literak I, Klimes J, Horvathova A, Moravkova M, Bartos M, Trcka I, Pavlik I. Detection of Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis in two Brown bears in the central European Carpathians. J Wildl Dis. 2006;42:691–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lehtinen VA, Kaukonen T, Ikäheimo I, Mähönen SM, Koskela M, Ylipalosaari P. Mycobacterium fortuitum infection after a Brown bear bite. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43:1009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    De Lisle GW, Bengis RG, Schmitt SM, O’Brien DJ. Tuberculosis in free-ranging wildlife: detection, diagnosis and management. Rev Sci Tech Off Int Epiz. 2002;21:317–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Igimi S, Takahashi E, Mitsuoka T. Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. coagulans subsp. nov., isolated from the external auditory meatus of dogs with external ear otitis. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1990;40:409–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bannoehr J, Franco A, Iurescia M, Battisti A, Fitzgerald JR. Molecular diagnostic identification of Staphylococcus pseudintermedius. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47:469–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Martín-Atance P, Palomares F, González-Candela M, Revilla E, Cubero MJ, Calzada J, León-Vizcaíno L. Bovine tuberculosis in a free ranging red fox (Vulpes vulpes) from Doñana National Park (Spain). J Wildl Dis. 2005;41:435–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Matos AC, Figueira L, Martins MH, Matos M, Morais M, Dias AP, Coelho AC. Mycobacterium bovis in an Egyptian mongoose. Vet Rec. 2013;173:376–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bruning-Fann CS, Schmitt SM, Fitzgerald SD, Payeur JB, Whipple DL, Cooley TM, Carlson T, Friedrich PD. Mycobacterium bovis in coyotes from Michigan. J Wildl Dis. 1998;34:632–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Helman RG, Russell WC, Jenny A, Miller J, Payeur J. Diagnosis of tuberculosis in two snow leopards using polymerase chain reaction. J Vet Diagn Investig. 1998;10:89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lee J, Hanna R, Hill R, McCormick CM, Skuce A. Bovine tuberculosis in an Eurasian otter. Vet Rec. 2009;164:727–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Marangon S, Martini M, Dalla Pozza M. Neto F. a case-control study on bovine tuberculosis in the Veneto region (Italy). Prev Vet Med. 1998;34:87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Miller RS, Sweeney SJ. Mycobacterium bovis (bovine tuberculosis) infection in north American wildlife: current status and opportunities for mitigation of risks of further infection in wildlife populations. Epidemiol Infect. 2013;141:1357–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Sorensen A, van Beest FM, Brook RK. Impacts of wildlife baiting and supplemental feeding on infectious disease transmission risk: a synthesis of knowledge. Prev Vet Med. 2014;113:356–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Backues KA. Mycobacterial Disease in Carnivores In: Fowley ME, Miller RE, editors. Zoo and wild animal medicine current therapy. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2007. p. 294–8.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Clifton-Hadley RS, Wilesmith JW, Stuart FA. Mycobacterium bovis in the European badger (Meles meles): epidemiological findings in tuberculous badgers from a naturally infected population. Epidemiol Infect. 1993;111:9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s). 2019

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e ToscanaGrossetoItaly
  2. 2.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale delle Regioni Lazio e ToscanaRomeItaly
  3. 3.Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Lombardia e dell’Emilia-RomagnaNational Reference Laboratory for Bovine TuberculosisBresciaItaly

Personalised recommendations